Return the Closest Prime Number
$begingroup$
Challenge
This is a simple one: Given a positive integer up to 1,000,000, return the closest prime number.
If the number itself is prime, then you should return that number; if there are two primes of equal length away from the provided number, return the lower of the two.
Input is in the form of a single integer, and output should be in the form of an integer as well.
I don't care how you take in the input (function, STDIN, etc.) or display the output (function, STDOUT, etc.), as long as it works.
This is code golf, so standard rules apply—the program with the least bytes wins!
Test Cases
Input => Output
------ -------
80 => 79
100 => 101
5 => 5
9 => 7
532 => 523
1 => 2
code-golf primes
$endgroup$
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
Challenge
This is a simple one: Given a positive integer up to 1,000,000, return the closest prime number.
If the number itself is prime, then you should return that number; if there are two primes of equal length away from the provided number, return the lower of the two.
Input is in the form of a single integer, and output should be in the form of an integer as well.
I don't care how you take in the input (function, STDIN, etc.) or display the output (function, STDOUT, etc.), as long as it works.
This is code golf, so standard rules apply—the program with the least bytes wins!
Test Cases
Input => Output
------ -------
80 => 79
100 => 101
5 => 5
9 => 7
532 => 523
1 => 2
code-golf primes
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
Hi and welcome to PPCG!. To avoid down voting due to lack of quality I suggest you to post it to the sandbox first and after a couple of days post it here
$endgroup$
– Luis felipe De jesus Munoz
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
This is one of the outputs requested in this challenge.
$endgroup$
– Arnauld
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
Very closely related but not quite identical.
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Arnauld I saw that one, but I thought that they were different enough to warrant a new question.
$endgroup$
– Bobawob
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Giuseppe Yeah, I found out about that one after already posting...
$endgroup$
– Bobawob
12 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
Challenge
This is a simple one: Given a positive integer up to 1,000,000, return the closest prime number.
If the number itself is prime, then you should return that number; if there are two primes of equal length away from the provided number, return the lower of the two.
Input is in the form of a single integer, and output should be in the form of an integer as well.
I don't care how you take in the input (function, STDIN, etc.) or display the output (function, STDOUT, etc.), as long as it works.
This is code golf, so standard rules apply—the program with the least bytes wins!
Test Cases
Input => Output
------ -------
80 => 79
100 => 101
5 => 5
9 => 7
532 => 523
1 => 2
code-golf primes
$endgroup$
Challenge
This is a simple one: Given a positive integer up to 1,000,000, return the closest prime number.
If the number itself is prime, then you should return that number; if there are two primes of equal length away from the provided number, return the lower of the two.
Input is in the form of a single integer, and output should be in the form of an integer as well.
I don't care how you take in the input (function, STDIN, etc.) or display the output (function, STDOUT, etc.), as long as it works.
This is code golf, so standard rules apply—the program with the least bytes wins!
Test Cases
Input => Output
------ -------
80 => 79
100 => 101
5 => 5
9 => 7
532 => 523
1 => 2
code-golf primes
code-golf primes
edited 1 hour ago
Cody Gray
2,029416
2,029416
asked 13 hours ago
BobawobBobawob
16611
16611
3
$begingroup$
Hi and welcome to PPCG!. To avoid down voting due to lack of quality I suggest you to post it to the sandbox first and after a couple of days post it here
$endgroup$
– Luis felipe De jesus Munoz
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
This is one of the outputs requested in this challenge.
$endgroup$
– Arnauld
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
Very closely related but not quite identical.
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Arnauld I saw that one, but I thought that they were different enough to warrant a new question.
$endgroup$
– Bobawob
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Giuseppe Yeah, I found out about that one after already posting...
$endgroup$
– Bobawob
12 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
3
$begingroup$
Hi and welcome to PPCG!. To avoid down voting due to lack of quality I suggest you to post it to the sandbox first and after a couple of days post it here
$endgroup$
– Luis felipe De jesus Munoz
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
This is one of the outputs requested in this challenge.
$endgroup$
– Arnauld
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
Very closely related but not quite identical.
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Arnauld I saw that one, but I thought that they were different enough to warrant a new question.
$endgroup$
– Bobawob
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Giuseppe Yeah, I found out about that one after already posting...
$endgroup$
– Bobawob
12 hours ago
3
3
$begingroup$
Hi and welcome to PPCG!. To avoid down voting due to lack of quality I suggest you to post it to the sandbox first and after a couple of days post it here
$endgroup$
– Luis felipe De jesus Munoz
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
Hi and welcome to PPCG!. To avoid down voting due to lack of quality I suggest you to post it to the sandbox first and after a couple of days post it here
$endgroup$
– Luis felipe De jesus Munoz
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
This is one of the outputs requested in this challenge.
$endgroup$
– Arnauld
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
This is one of the outputs requested in this challenge.
$endgroup$
– Arnauld
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
Very closely related but not quite identical.
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
Very closely related but not quite identical.
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Arnauld I saw that one, but I thought that they were different enough to warrant a new question.
$endgroup$
– Bobawob
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Arnauld I saw that one, but I thought that they were different enough to warrant a new question.
$endgroup$
– Bobawob
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Giuseppe Yeah, I found out about that one after already posting...
$endgroup$
– Bobawob
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Giuseppe Yeah, I found out about that one after already posting...
$endgroup$
– Bobawob
12 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
22 Answers
22
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
05AB1E, 5 bytes
Åps.x
Try it online!
or as a Test Suite
Inefficient for big numbers
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
JavaScript (ES6), 53 bytes
n=>(g=(o,d=N=n+o)=>N%--d?g(o,d):d-1?g(o<0?-o:~o):N)``
Try it online!
Commented
n => ( // n = input
g = ( // g = recursive function taking:
o, // o = offset
d = // d = current divisor, initialized to N
N = n + o // N = input + offset
) => //
N % --d ? // decrement d; if d is not a divisor of N:
g(o, d) // do recursive calls until it is
: // else:
d - 1 ? // if d is not equal to 1 (either N is composite or N = 1):
g( // do a recursive call with the next offset:
o < 0 ? // if o is negative:
-o // make it positive (e.g. -1 -> +1)
: // else:
~o // use -(o + 1) (e.g. +1 -> -2)
) // end of recursive call
: // else (N is prime):
N // stop recursion and return N
)`` // initial call to g with o = [''] (zero-ish)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Octave, 40 bytes
@(n)p([~,k]=min(abs(n-(p=primes(2*n)))))
Try it online!
This uses the fact that there is always a prime between n
and 2*n
(Bertrand–Chebyshev theorem).
How it works
@(n)p([~,k]=min(abs(n-(p=primes(2*n)))))
@(n) % Define anonymous function with input n
p=primes(2*n) % Vector of primes up to 2*n. Assign to p
abs(n-( )) % Absolute difference between n and each prime
[~,k]=min( ) % Index of first minimum (assign to k; not used)
p( ) % Apply that index to p
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Pyth, 10 bytes
haDQfP_TSy
Try it online here, or verify all the test cases at once here.
haDQfP_TSyQ Implicit: Q=eval(input())
Trailing Q inferred
yQ 2 * Q
S Range from 1 to the above
f Filter keep the elements of the above, as T, where:
P_T Is T prime?
D Order the above by...
a Q ... absolute difference between each element and Q
This is a stable sort, so smaller primes will be sorted before larger ones if difference is the same
h Take the first element of the above, implicit print
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Japt, 5 bytes
_j}cU
Try it or run all test cases
_j}cU :Implicit input of integer U
_ :Function taking an integer as an argument
j : Test if integer is prime
} :End function
cU :Return the first integer in [U,U-1,U+1,U-2,...] that returns true
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Gaia, 3 bytes
ṅD⌡
Try it online!
Rather slow for large inputs, but works given enough memory/time.
I'm not sure why D⌡
implicitly pushes z
again, but it makes this a remarkably short answer!
ṅ | implicit input z: push first z prime numbers, call it P
D⌡ | take the absolute difference between P and (implicit) z,
| returning the smallest value in P with the minimum absolute difference
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Wolfram Language (Mathematica), 53 bytes
If[PrimeQ[s=#],s,#&@@Nearest[s~NextPrime~{-1, 1},s]]&
Try it online!
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Python 2, 96 bytes
l=lambda p:min(filter(lambda p:all(p%n for n in range(2,p)),range(2,p*2)),key=lambda x:abs(x-p))
Try it online!
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
This seems to fail for $n=1$.
$endgroup$
– Arnauld
11 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
VDM-SL, 161 bytes
f(i)==(lambda p:set of nat1&let z in set p be st forall m in set p&abs(m-i)>=abs(z-i)in z)({x|x in set{1,...,9**7}&forall y in set{2,...,1003}&y<>x=>x mod y<>0})
A full program to run might look like this - it's worth noting that the bounds of the set of primes used should probably be changed if you actually want to run this, since it will take a long time to run for 1 million:
functions
f:nat1+>nat1
f(i)==(lambda p:set of nat1&let z in set p be st forall m in set p&abs(m-i)>=abs(z-i)in z)({x|x in set{1,...,9**7}&forall y in set{2,...,1003}&y<>x=>x mod y<>0})
Explanation:
f(i)== /* f is a function which takes a nat1 (natural number not including 0)*/
(lambda p:set of nat1 /* define a lambda which takes a set of nat1*/
&let z in set p be st /* which has an element z in the set such that */
forall m in set p /* for every element in the set*/
&abs(m-i) /* the difference between the element m and the input*/
>=abs(z-i) /* is greater than or equal to the difference between the element z and the input */
in z) /* and return z from the lambda */
( /* apply this lambda to... */
{ /* a set defined by comprehension as.. */
x| /* all elements x such that.. */
x in set{1,...,9**7} /* x is between 1 and 9^7 */
&forall y in set{2,...,1003} /* and for all values between 2 and 1003*/
&y<>x=>x mod y<>0 /* y is not x implies x is not divisible by y*/
}
)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
APL(NARS), 38 chars, 76 bytes
{⍵≤1:2⋄0π⍵:⍵⋄d←1π⍵⋄(d-⍵)≥⍵-s←¯1π⍵:s⋄d}
0π is the test for prime, ¯1π the prev prime, 1π is the next prime; test:
f←{⍵≤1:2⋄0π⍵:⍵⋄d←1π⍵⋄(d-⍵)≥⍵-s←¯1π⍵:s⋄d}
f¨80 100 5 9 532 1
79 101 5 7 523 2
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Jelly, 9 7 bytes
ḤÆRạÞµḢ
Try it online!
Slow for larger input, but works ok for the requested range. Thanks to @EriktheOutgolfer for saving 2 bytes!
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Hey, that's clever! Save two by substituting_A¥
withạ
(absolute difference). Oh, andḤ
can really be‘
.
$endgroup$
– Erik the Outgolfer
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@EriktheOutgolfer thanks. Surely using‘
won’t always work? It means that only primes up to n+1 will be found, while the closest might be n+2.
$endgroup$
– Nick Kennedy
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Hm, that's a concern.
$endgroup$
– Erik the Outgolfer
5 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Tidy, 43 bytes
{x:(prime↦splice(]x,-1,-∞],[x,∞]))@0}
Try it online!
Explanation
This is a lambda with parameter x
. This works by creating the following sequence:
[x - 1, x, x - 2, x + 1, x - 3, x + 2, x - 4, x + 3, ...]
This is splicing together the two sequences ]x, -1, -∞]
(left-closed, right-open) and [x, ∞]
(both open).
For x = 80
, this looks like:
[79, 80, 78, 81, 77, 82, 76, 83, 75, 84, 74, 85, ...]
Then, we use f↦s
to select all elements from s
satisfying f
. In this case, we filter out all composite numbers, leaving only the prime ones. For the same x
, this becomes:
[79, 83, 73, 71, 89, 67, 97, 61, 59, 101, 103, 53, ...]
Then, we use (...)@0
to select the first member of this sequence. Since the lower of the two needs to be selected, the sequence which starts with x - 1
is spliced in first.
Note: Only one of x
and x - 1
can be prime, so it is okay that the spliced sequence starts with x - 1
. Though the sequence could be open on both sides ([x,-1,-∞]
), this would needlessly include x
twice in the sequence. So, for sake of "efficiency", I chose the left-closed version (also because I like to show off Tidy).
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Python 2, 71 bytes
f=lambda n,k=1,p=1:k<n*3and min(k+n-p%k*2*n,f(n,k+1,p*k*k)-n,key=abs)+n
Try it online!
A recursive function that uses the Wilson's Theorem prime generator. The product p
tracks $(k-1)!^2$, and p%k
is 1 for primes and 0 for non-primes. To make it easy to compare abs(k-n)
for different primes k
, we store k-n
and compare via abs
, adding back n
to get the result k
.
The expression k+n-p%k*2*n
is designed to give k-n
on primes (where p%k=1
), and otherwise a "bad" value of k+n
that's always bigger in absolute value and so doesn't affect the minimum, so that non-primes are passed over.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
C# (Visual C# Interactive Compiler), 112 bytes
g=>Enumerable.Range(2,2<<20).Where(x=>Enumerable.Range(1,x).Count(y=>x%y<1)<3).OrderBy(x=>Math.Abs(x-g)).First()
Try it online!
Left shifts by 20 in submission but 10 in TIO so that TIO terminates for test cases.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
APL (Dyalog Extended), 20 bytesSBCS
⊢(⊃>/⍤|⍤-⌽⊢)¯4 4⍭3⌈⊢
Try it online!
⊢
the argument
3⌈
max of 3 and that
¯4 4⍭
the previous and next primes`
⊢(
…)
apply the following infix tacit function to that, with the original argument as left argument:
⊢
the primes
…⌽
cyclically rotate them the following number of steps:
-
the original argument minus the primes
⍤
then
|
absolute value of that
⍤
then
>/
Boolean (0/1) whether the left is greater than the right (i.e. 1 if next is closer)
⊃
pick the first one (i.e. previous if previous is closer and next if next is closer)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Swift, 186 bytes
func p(a:Int){let b=q(a:a,b:-1),c=q(a:a,b:1);print(a-b<=c-a ? b:c)}
func q(a:Int,b:Int)->Int{var k=max(a,2),c=2;while k>c && c != a/2{if k%c==0{k+=b;c=2}else{c=c==2 ? c+1:c+2}};return k}
Try it online!
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Jelly, 14 bytes
ÆpæRÆnạÞƲ2>?2Ḣ
Try it online!
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
C# (Visual C# Interactive Compiler), 96 bytes
n=>{for(int i=0,j;;)if((j=n+i/2*(i++%2*2-1))>1&&Enumerable.Range(2,j-2).All(d=>j%d>0))return j;}
Try it online!
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Zsh, 101 92 91 bytes
-9 by collapsing the body into the head of p
's loop, -1 from using i=j
instead of i=$1
in main loop.
p(){for ((n=2;n<$1&&$1%n++;)):
(($1==n))&&<<<$1}
j=$1
for ((i=j;;++j&&--i))p $i||p $j&&exit
Try it online!
Try it online!
57 48 bytes to the prime testing function, 43 42 bytes to the main loop (1 byte to the newline between them):
p(){ # prime function: takes one input, outputs via return code
for (( n = 2; n < $1 && $1 % n++; )) # divisibility check in loop header
: # no-op loop body
(( $1 == n )) && # if we looped up to $1:
<<< $1 # echo out $1. Otherwise, this will return false
}
For the last condition, we can't use the shorter (($1-n))||
, because we need to return false to the main loop if we didn't find a prime. We print in the function to avoid complexity in the main loop.
j=$1 # set i = j = $1. Doing one in and one out is smallest
for (( i = j; ; ++j && --i )) # loop indefinitely, increment and decrement
p $i || p $j && exit # if either $i or $j was a prime, exit
Conditionals are left-associative, which we take advantage of here. We do test the starting number twice to make the decrement logic simpler.
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
C, 122 bytes
#define r return
p(a,i){if(a<2)r 0;i=1;while(++i<a)if(a%i<1)r 0;r 1;}c(a,b){b=a;while(1){if(p(b))r b;if(p(--a))r a;b++;}}
Use it calling function c() and passing as argument the number, it should return the closest prime.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Python 2, 93 bytes
lambda n:sorted(range(1,3*n),key=lambda x:abs(x-n)if all(x%k for k in range(2,x))else 2*n)[0]
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
You don't need thef=
in the start
$endgroup$
– Embodiment of Ignorance
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@EmbodimentofIgnorance Thanks, fixed that along with the range and non-prime penalty criteria that was causing n=1 to fail
$endgroup$
– deustice
7 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
The primality check doesn't work for Fermat pseudoprimes such as 341=31*11 which it calls prime.
$endgroup$
– xnor
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@xnor Fixed, thanks
$endgroup$
– deustice
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
J, 19 15 bytes
(0{]/:|@-)p:@i.
Try it online!
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "200"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodegolf.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f182305%2freturn-the-closest-prime-number%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
22 Answers
22
active
oldest
votes
22 Answers
22
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
05AB1E, 5 bytes
Åps.x
Try it online!
or as a Test Suite
Inefficient for big numbers
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
05AB1E, 5 bytes
Åps.x
Try it online!
or as a Test Suite
Inefficient for big numbers
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
05AB1E, 5 bytes
Åps.x
Try it online!
or as a Test Suite
Inefficient for big numbers
$endgroup$
05AB1E, 5 bytes
Åps.x
Try it online!
or as a Test Suite
Inefficient for big numbers
answered 13 hours ago
EmignaEmigna
47.2k433143
47.2k433143
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
JavaScript (ES6), 53 bytes
n=>(g=(o,d=N=n+o)=>N%--d?g(o,d):d-1?g(o<0?-o:~o):N)``
Try it online!
Commented
n => ( // n = input
g = ( // g = recursive function taking:
o, // o = offset
d = // d = current divisor, initialized to N
N = n + o // N = input + offset
) => //
N % --d ? // decrement d; if d is not a divisor of N:
g(o, d) // do recursive calls until it is
: // else:
d - 1 ? // if d is not equal to 1 (either N is composite or N = 1):
g( // do a recursive call with the next offset:
o < 0 ? // if o is negative:
-o // make it positive (e.g. -1 -> +1)
: // else:
~o // use -(o + 1) (e.g. +1 -> -2)
) // end of recursive call
: // else (N is prime):
N // stop recursion and return N
)`` // initial call to g with o = [''] (zero-ish)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
JavaScript (ES6), 53 bytes
n=>(g=(o,d=N=n+o)=>N%--d?g(o,d):d-1?g(o<0?-o:~o):N)``
Try it online!
Commented
n => ( // n = input
g = ( // g = recursive function taking:
o, // o = offset
d = // d = current divisor, initialized to N
N = n + o // N = input + offset
) => //
N % --d ? // decrement d; if d is not a divisor of N:
g(o, d) // do recursive calls until it is
: // else:
d - 1 ? // if d is not equal to 1 (either N is composite or N = 1):
g( // do a recursive call with the next offset:
o < 0 ? // if o is negative:
-o // make it positive (e.g. -1 -> +1)
: // else:
~o // use -(o + 1) (e.g. +1 -> -2)
) // end of recursive call
: // else (N is prime):
N // stop recursion and return N
)`` // initial call to g with o = [''] (zero-ish)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
JavaScript (ES6), 53 bytes
n=>(g=(o,d=N=n+o)=>N%--d?g(o,d):d-1?g(o<0?-o:~o):N)``
Try it online!
Commented
n => ( // n = input
g = ( // g = recursive function taking:
o, // o = offset
d = // d = current divisor, initialized to N
N = n + o // N = input + offset
) => //
N % --d ? // decrement d; if d is not a divisor of N:
g(o, d) // do recursive calls until it is
: // else:
d - 1 ? // if d is not equal to 1 (either N is composite or N = 1):
g( // do a recursive call with the next offset:
o < 0 ? // if o is negative:
-o // make it positive (e.g. -1 -> +1)
: // else:
~o // use -(o + 1) (e.g. +1 -> -2)
) // end of recursive call
: // else (N is prime):
N // stop recursion and return N
)`` // initial call to g with o = [''] (zero-ish)
$endgroup$
JavaScript (ES6), 53 bytes
n=>(g=(o,d=N=n+o)=>N%--d?g(o,d):d-1?g(o<0?-o:~o):N)``
Try it online!
Commented
n => ( // n = input
g = ( // g = recursive function taking:
o, // o = offset
d = // d = current divisor, initialized to N
N = n + o // N = input + offset
) => //
N % --d ? // decrement d; if d is not a divisor of N:
g(o, d) // do recursive calls until it is
: // else:
d - 1 ? // if d is not equal to 1 (either N is composite or N = 1):
g( // do a recursive call with the next offset:
o < 0 ? // if o is negative:
-o // make it positive (e.g. -1 -> +1)
: // else:
~o // use -(o + 1) (e.g. +1 -> -2)
) // end of recursive call
: // else (N is prime):
N // stop recursion and return N
)`` // initial call to g with o = [''] (zero-ish)
edited 11 hours ago
answered 12 hours ago
ArnauldArnauld
79.9k797330
79.9k797330
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Octave, 40 bytes
@(n)p([~,k]=min(abs(n-(p=primes(2*n)))))
Try it online!
This uses the fact that there is always a prime between n
and 2*n
(Bertrand–Chebyshev theorem).
How it works
@(n)p([~,k]=min(abs(n-(p=primes(2*n)))))
@(n) % Define anonymous function with input n
p=primes(2*n) % Vector of primes up to 2*n. Assign to p
abs(n-( )) % Absolute difference between n and each prime
[~,k]=min( ) % Index of first minimum (assign to k; not used)
p( ) % Apply that index to p
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Octave, 40 bytes
@(n)p([~,k]=min(abs(n-(p=primes(2*n)))))
Try it online!
This uses the fact that there is always a prime between n
and 2*n
(Bertrand–Chebyshev theorem).
How it works
@(n)p([~,k]=min(abs(n-(p=primes(2*n)))))
@(n) % Define anonymous function with input n
p=primes(2*n) % Vector of primes up to 2*n. Assign to p
abs(n-( )) % Absolute difference between n and each prime
[~,k]=min( ) % Index of first minimum (assign to k; not used)
p( ) % Apply that index to p
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Octave, 40 bytes
@(n)p([~,k]=min(abs(n-(p=primes(2*n)))))
Try it online!
This uses the fact that there is always a prime between n
and 2*n
(Bertrand–Chebyshev theorem).
How it works
@(n)p([~,k]=min(abs(n-(p=primes(2*n)))))
@(n) % Define anonymous function with input n
p=primes(2*n) % Vector of primes up to 2*n. Assign to p
abs(n-( )) % Absolute difference between n and each prime
[~,k]=min( ) % Index of first minimum (assign to k; not used)
p( ) % Apply that index to p
$endgroup$
Octave, 40 bytes
@(n)p([~,k]=min(abs(n-(p=primes(2*n)))))
Try it online!
This uses the fact that there is always a prime between n
and 2*n
(Bertrand–Chebyshev theorem).
How it works
@(n)p([~,k]=min(abs(n-(p=primes(2*n)))))
@(n) % Define anonymous function with input n
p=primes(2*n) % Vector of primes up to 2*n. Assign to p
abs(n-( )) % Absolute difference between n and each prime
[~,k]=min( ) % Index of first minimum (assign to k; not used)
p( ) % Apply that index to p
edited 5 hours ago
answered 9 hours ago
Luis MendoLuis Mendo
75.1k888291
75.1k888291
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Pyth, 10 bytes
haDQfP_TSy
Try it online here, or verify all the test cases at once here.
haDQfP_TSyQ Implicit: Q=eval(input())
Trailing Q inferred
yQ 2 * Q
S Range from 1 to the above
f Filter keep the elements of the above, as T, where:
P_T Is T prime?
D Order the above by...
a Q ... absolute difference between each element and Q
This is a stable sort, so smaller primes will be sorted before larger ones if difference is the same
h Take the first element of the above, implicit print
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Pyth, 10 bytes
haDQfP_TSy
Try it online here, or verify all the test cases at once here.
haDQfP_TSyQ Implicit: Q=eval(input())
Trailing Q inferred
yQ 2 * Q
S Range from 1 to the above
f Filter keep the elements of the above, as T, where:
P_T Is T prime?
D Order the above by...
a Q ... absolute difference between each element and Q
This is a stable sort, so smaller primes will be sorted before larger ones if difference is the same
h Take the first element of the above, implicit print
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Pyth, 10 bytes
haDQfP_TSy
Try it online here, or verify all the test cases at once here.
haDQfP_TSyQ Implicit: Q=eval(input())
Trailing Q inferred
yQ 2 * Q
S Range from 1 to the above
f Filter keep the elements of the above, as T, where:
P_T Is T prime?
D Order the above by...
a Q ... absolute difference between each element and Q
This is a stable sort, so smaller primes will be sorted before larger ones if difference is the same
h Take the first element of the above, implicit print
$endgroup$
Pyth, 10 bytes
haDQfP_TSy
Try it online here, or verify all the test cases at once here.
haDQfP_TSyQ Implicit: Q=eval(input())
Trailing Q inferred
yQ 2 * Q
S Range from 1 to the above
f Filter keep the elements of the above, as T, where:
P_T Is T prime?
D Order the above by...
a Q ... absolute difference between each element and Q
This is a stable sort, so smaller primes will be sorted before larger ones if difference is the same
h Take the first element of the above, implicit print
answered 12 hours ago
SokSok
4,127925
4,127925
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Japt, 5 bytes
_j}cU
Try it or run all test cases
_j}cU :Implicit input of integer U
_ :Function taking an integer as an argument
j : Test if integer is prime
} :End function
cU :Return the first integer in [U,U-1,U+1,U-2,...] that returns true
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Japt, 5 bytes
_j}cU
Try it or run all test cases
_j}cU :Implicit input of integer U
_ :Function taking an integer as an argument
j : Test if integer is prime
} :End function
cU :Return the first integer in [U,U-1,U+1,U-2,...] that returns true
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Japt, 5 bytes
_j}cU
Try it or run all test cases
_j}cU :Implicit input of integer U
_ :Function taking an integer as an argument
j : Test if integer is prime
} :End function
cU :Return the first integer in [U,U-1,U+1,U-2,...] that returns true
$endgroup$
Japt, 5 bytes
_j}cU
Try it or run all test cases
_j}cU :Implicit input of integer U
_ :Function taking an integer as an argument
j : Test if integer is prime
} :End function
cU :Return the first integer in [U,U-1,U+1,U-2,...] that returns true
edited 12 hours ago
answered 12 hours ago
ShaggyShaggy
19k21667
19k21667
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Gaia, 3 bytes
ṅD⌡
Try it online!
Rather slow for large inputs, but works given enough memory/time.
I'm not sure why D⌡
implicitly pushes z
again, but it makes this a remarkably short answer!
ṅ | implicit input z: push first z prime numbers, call it P
D⌡ | take the absolute difference between P and (implicit) z,
| returning the smallest value in P with the minimum absolute difference
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Gaia, 3 bytes
ṅD⌡
Try it online!
Rather slow for large inputs, but works given enough memory/time.
I'm not sure why D⌡
implicitly pushes z
again, but it makes this a remarkably short answer!
ṅ | implicit input z: push first z prime numbers, call it P
D⌡ | take the absolute difference between P and (implicit) z,
| returning the smallest value in P with the minimum absolute difference
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Gaia, 3 bytes
ṅD⌡
Try it online!
Rather slow for large inputs, but works given enough memory/time.
I'm not sure why D⌡
implicitly pushes z
again, but it makes this a remarkably short answer!
ṅ | implicit input z: push first z prime numbers, call it P
D⌡ | take the absolute difference between P and (implicit) z,
| returning the smallest value in P with the minimum absolute difference
$endgroup$
Gaia, 3 bytes
ṅD⌡
Try it online!
Rather slow for large inputs, but works given enough memory/time.
I'm not sure why D⌡
implicitly pushes z
again, but it makes this a remarkably short answer!
ṅ | implicit input z: push first z prime numbers, call it P
D⌡ | take the absolute difference between P and (implicit) z,
| returning the smallest value in P with the minimum absolute difference
edited 8 hours ago
answered 8 hours ago
GiuseppeGiuseppe
17.2k31152
17.2k31152
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Wolfram Language (Mathematica), 53 bytes
If[PrimeQ[s=#],s,#&@@Nearest[s~NextPrime~{-1, 1},s]]&
Try it online!
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Wolfram Language (Mathematica), 53 bytes
If[PrimeQ[s=#],s,#&@@Nearest[s~NextPrime~{-1, 1},s]]&
Try it online!
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Wolfram Language (Mathematica), 53 bytes
If[PrimeQ[s=#],s,#&@@Nearest[s~NextPrime~{-1, 1},s]]&
Try it online!
$endgroup$
Wolfram Language (Mathematica), 53 bytes
If[PrimeQ[s=#],s,#&@@Nearest[s~NextPrime~{-1, 1},s]]&
Try it online!
answered 12 hours ago
J42161217J42161217
13.6k21252
13.6k21252
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Python 2, 96 bytes
l=lambda p:min(filter(lambda p:all(p%n for n in range(2,p)),range(2,p*2)),key=lambda x:abs(x-p))
Try it online!
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
This seems to fail for $n=1$.
$endgroup$
– Arnauld
11 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Python 2, 96 bytes
l=lambda p:min(filter(lambda p:all(p%n for n in range(2,p)),range(2,p*2)),key=lambda x:abs(x-p))
Try it online!
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
This seems to fail for $n=1$.
$endgroup$
– Arnauld
11 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Python 2, 96 bytes
l=lambda p:min(filter(lambda p:all(p%n for n in range(2,p)),range(2,p*2)),key=lambda x:abs(x-p))
Try it online!
$endgroup$
Python 2, 96 bytes
l=lambda p:min(filter(lambda p:all(p%n for n in range(2,p)),range(2,p*2)),key=lambda x:abs(x-p))
Try it online!
answered 12 hours ago
Snaddyvitch DispenserSnaddyvitch Dispenser
1015
1015
2
$begingroup$
This seems to fail for $n=1$.
$endgroup$
– Arnauld
11 hours ago
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
This seems to fail for $n=1$.
$endgroup$
– Arnauld
11 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
This seems to fail for $n=1$.
$endgroup$
– Arnauld
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
This seems to fail for $n=1$.
$endgroup$
– Arnauld
11 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
VDM-SL, 161 bytes
f(i)==(lambda p:set of nat1&let z in set p be st forall m in set p&abs(m-i)>=abs(z-i)in z)({x|x in set{1,...,9**7}&forall y in set{2,...,1003}&y<>x=>x mod y<>0})
A full program to run might look like this - it's worth noting that the bounds of the set of primes used should probably be changed if you actually want to run this, since it will take a long time to run for 1 million:
functions
f:nat1+>nat1
f(i)==(lambda p:set of nat1&let z in set p be st forall m in set p&abs(m-i)>=abs(z-i)in z)({x|x in set{1,...,9**7}&forall y in set{2,...,1003}&y<>x=>x mod y<>0})
Explanation:
f(i)== /* f is a function which takes a nat1 (natural number not including 0)*/
(lambda p:set of nat1 /* define a lambda which takes a set of nat1*/
&let z in set p be st /* which has an element z in the set such that */
forall m in set p /* for every element in the set*/
&abs(m-i) /* the difference between the element m and the input*/
>=abs(z-i) /* is greater than or equal to the difference between the element z and the input */
in z) /* and return z from the lambda */
( /* apply this lambda to... */
{ /* a set defined by comprehension as.. */
x| /* all elements x such that.. */
x in set{1,...,9**7} /* x is between 1 and 9^7 */
&forall y in set{2,...,1003} /* and for all values between 2 and 1003*/
&y<>x=>x mod y<>0 /* y is not x implies x is not divisible by y*/
}
)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
VDM-SL, 161 bytes
f(i)==(lambda p:set of nat1&let z in set p be st forall m in set p&abs(m-i)>=abs(z-i)in z)({x|x in set{1,...,9**7}&forall y in set{2,...,1003}&y<>x=>x mod y<>0})
A full program to run might look like this - it's worth noting that the bounds of the set of primes used should probably be changed if you actually want to run this, since it will take a long time to run for 1 million:
functions
f:nat1+>nat1
f(i)==(lambda p:set of nat1&let z in set p be st forall m in set p&abs(m-i)>=abs(z-i)in z)({x|x in set{1,...,9**7}&forall y in set{2,...,1003}&y<>x=>x mod y<>0})
Explanation:
f(i)== /* f is a function which takes a nat1 (natural number not including 0)*/
(lambda p:set of nat1 /* define a lambda which takes a set of nat1*/
&let z in set p be st /* which has an element z in the set such that */
forall m in set p /* for every element in the set*/
&abs(m-i) /* the difference between the element m and the input*/
>=abs(z-i) /* is greater than or equal to the difference between the element z and the input */
in z) /* and return z from the lambda */
( /* apply this lambda to... */
{ /* a set defined by comprehension as.. */
x| /* all elements x such that.. */
x in set{1,...,9**7} /* x is between 1 and 9^7 */
&forall y in set{2,...,1003} /* and for all values between 2 and 1003*/
&y<>x=>x mod y<>0 /* y is not x implies x is not divisible by y*/
}
)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
VDM-SL, 161 bytes
f(i)==(lambda p:set of nat1&let z in set p be st forall m in set p&abs(m-i)>=abs(z-i)in z)({x|x in set{1,...,9**7}&forall y in set{2,...,1003}&y<>x=>x mod y<>0})
A full program to run might look like this - it's worth noting that the bounds of the set of primes used should probably be changed if you actually want to run this, since it will take a long time to run for 1 million:
functions
f:nat1+>nat1
f(i)==(lambda p:set of nat1&let z in set p be st forall m in set p&abs(m-i)>=abs(z-i)in z)({x|x in set{1,...,9**7}&forall y in set{2,...,1003}&y<>x=>x mod y<>0})
Explanation:
f(i)== /* f is a function which takes a nat1 (natural number not including 0)*/
(lambda p:set of nat1 /* define a lambda which takes a set of nat1*/
&let z in set p be st /* which has an element z in the set such that */
forall m in set p /* for every element in the set*/
&abs(m-i) /* the difference between the element m and the input*/
>=abs(z-i) /* is greater than or equal to the difference between the element z and the input */
in z) /* and return z from the lambda */
( /* apply this lambda to... */
{ /* a set defined by comprehension as.. */
x| /* all elements x such that.. */
x in set{1,...,9**7} /* x is between 1 and 9^7 */
&forall y in set{2,...,1003} /* and for all values between 2 and 1003*/
&y<>x=>x mod y<>0 /* y is not x implies x is not divisible by y*/
}
)
$endgroup$
VDM-SL, 161 bytes
f(i)==(lambda p:set of nat1&let z in set p be st forall m in set p&abs(m-i)>=abs(z-i)in z)({x|x in set{1,...,9**7}&forall y in set{2,...,1003}&y<>x=>x mod y<>0})
A full program to run might look like this - it's worth noting that the bounds of the set of primes used should probably be changed if you actually want to run this, since it will take a long time to run for 1 million:
functions
f:nat1+>nat1
f(i)==(lambda p:set of nat1&let z in set p be st forall m in set p&abs(m-i)>=abs(z-i)in z)({x|x in set{1,...,9**7}&forall y in set{2,...,1003}&y<>x=>x mod y<>0})
Explanation:
f(i)== /* f is a function which takes a nat1 (natural number not including 0)*/
(lambda p:set of nat1 /* define a lambda which takes a set of nat1*/
&let z in set p be st /* which has an element z in the set such that */
forall m in set p /* for every element in the set*/
&abs(m-i) /* the difference between the element m and the input*/
>=abs(z-i) /* is greater than or equal to the difference between the element z and the input */
in z) /* and return z from the lambda */
( /* apply this lambda to... */
{ /* a set defined by comprehension as.. */
x| /* all elements x such that.. */
x in set{1,...,9**7} /* x is between 1 and 9^7 */
&forall y in set{2,...,1003} /* and for all values between 2 and 1003*/
&y<>x=>x mod y<>0 /* y is not x implies x is not divisible by y*/
}
)
answered 12 hours ago
Expired DataExpired Data
3686
3686
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
APL(NARS), 38 chars, 76 bytes
{⍵≤1:2⋄0π⍵:⍵⋄d←1π⍵⋄(d-⍵)≥⍵-s←¯1π⍵:s⋄d}
0π is the test for prime, ¯1π the prev prime, 1π is the next prime; test:
f←{⍵≤1:2⋄0π⍵:⍵⋄d←1π⍵⋄(d-⍵)≥⍵-s←¯1π⍵:s⋄d}
f¨80 100 5 9 532 1
79 101 5 7 523 2
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
APL(NARS), 38 chars, 76 bytes
{⍵≤1:2⋄0π⍵:⍵⋄d←1π⍵⋄(d-⍵)≥⍵-s←¯1π⍵:s⋄d}
0π is the test for prime, ¯1π the prev prime, 1π is the next prime; test:
f←{⍵≤1:2⋄0π⍵:⍵⋄d←1π⍵⋄(d-⍵)≥⍵-s←¯1π⍵:s⋄d}
f¨80 100 5 9 532 1
79 101 5 7 523 2
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
APL(NARS), 38 chars, 76 bytes
{⍵≤1:2⋄0π⍵:⍵⋄d←1π⍵⋄(d-⍵)≥⍵-s←¯1π⍵:s⋄d}
0π is the test for prime, ¯1π the prev prime, 1π is the next prime; test:
f←{⍵≤1:2⋄0π⍵:⍵⋄d←1π⍵⋄(d-⍵)≥⍵-s←¯1π⍵:s⋄d}
f¨80 100 5 9 532 1
79 101 5 7 523 2
$endgroup$
APL(NARS), 38 chars, 76 bytes
{⍵≤1:2⋄0π⍵:⍵⋄d←1π⍵⋄(d-⍵)≥⍵-s←¯1π⍵:s⋄d}
0π is the test for prime, ¯1π the prev prime, 1π is the next prime; test:
f←{⍵≤1:2⋄0π⍵:⍵⋄d←1π⍵⋄(d-⍵)≥⍵-s←¯1π⍵:s⋄d}
f¨80 100 5 9 532 1
79 101 5 7 523 2
answered 10 hours ago
RosLuPRosLuP
2,296514
2,296514
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Jelly, 9 7 bytes
ḤÆRạÞµḢ
Try it online!
Slow for larger input, but works ok for the requested range. Thanks to @EriktheOutgolfer for saving 2 bytes!
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Hey, that's clever! Save two by substituting_A¥
withạ
(absolute difference). Oh, andḤ
can really be‘
.
$endgroup$
– Erik the Outgolfer
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@EriktheOutgolfer thanks. Surely using‘
won’t always work? It means that only primes up to n+1 will be found, while the closest might be n+2.
$endgroup$
– Nick Kennedy
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Hm, that's a concern.
$endgroup$
– Erik the Outgolfer
5 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Jelly, 9 7 bytes
ḤÆRạÞµḢ
Try it online!
Slow for larger input, but works ok for the requested range. Thanks to @EriktheOutgolfer for saving 2 bytes!
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Hey, that's clever! Save two by substituting_A¥
withạ
(absolute difference). Oh, andḤ
can really be‘
.
$endgroup$
– Erik the Outgolfer
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@EriktheOutgolfer thanks. Surely using‘
won’t always work? It means that only primes up to n+1 will be found, while the closest might be n+2.
$endgroup$
– Nick Kennedy
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Hm, that's a concern.
$endgroup$
– Erik the Outgolfer
5 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Jelly, 9 7 bytes
ḤÆRạÞµḢ
Try it online!
Slow for larger input, but works ok for the requested range. Thanks to @EriktheOutgolfer for saving 2 bytes!
$endgroup$
Jelly, 9 7 bytes
ḤÆRạÞµḢ
Try it online!
Slow for larger input, but works ok for the requested range. Thanks to @EriktheOutgolfer for saving 2 bytes!
edited 9 hours ago
answered 9 hours ago
Nick KennedyNick Kennedy
1,04648
1,04648
$begingroup$
Hey, that's clever! Save two by substituting_A¥
withạ
(absolute difference). Oh, andḤ
can really be‘
.
$endgroup$
– Erik the Outgolfer
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@EriktheOutgolfer thanks. Surely using‘
won’t always work? It means that only primes up to n+1 will be found, while the closest might be n+2.
$endgroup$
– Nick Kennedy
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Hm, that's a concern.
$endgroup$
– Erik the Outgolfer
5 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hey, that's clever! Save two by substituting_A¥
withạ
(absolute difference). Oh, andḤ
can really be‘
.
$endgroup$
– Erik the Outgolfer
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@EriktheOutgolfer thanks. Surely using‘
won’t always work? It means that only primes up to n+1 will be found, while the closest might be n+2.
$endgroup$
– Nick Kennedy
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Hm, that's a concern.
$endgroup$
– Erik the Outgolfer
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Hey, that's clever! Save two by substituting
_A¥
with ạ
(absolute difference). Oh, and Ḥ
can really be ‘
.$endgroup$
– Erik the Outgolfer
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Hey, that's clever! Save two by substituting
_A¥
with ạ
(absolute difference). Oh, and Ḥ
can really be ‘
.$endgroup$
– Erik the Outgolfer
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@EriktheOutgolfer thanks. Surely using
‘
won’t always work? It means that only primes up to n+1 will be found, while the closest might be n+2.$endgroup$
– Nick Kennedy
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@EriktheOutgolfer thanks. Surely using
‘
won’t always work? It means that only primes up to n+1 will be found, while the closest might be n+2.$endgroup$
– Nick Kennedy
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Hm, that's a concern.
$endgroup$
– Erik the Outgolfer
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Hm, that's a concern.
$endgroup$
– Erik the Outgolfer
5 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Tidy, 43 bytes
{x:(prime↦splice(]x,-1,-∞],[x,∞]))@0}
Try it online!
Explanation
This is a lambda with parameter x
. This works by creating the following sequence:
[x - 1, x, x - 2, x + 1, x - 3, x + 2, x - 4, x + 3, ...]
This is splicing together the two sequences ]x, -1, -∞]
(left-closed, right-open) and [x, ∞]
(both open).
For x = 80
, this looks like:
[79, 80, 78, 81, 77, 82, 76, 83, 75, 84, 74, 85, ...]
Then, we use f↦s
to select all elements from s
satisfying f
. In this case, we filter out all composite numbers, leaving only the prime ones. For the same x
, this becomes:
[79, 83, 73, 71, 89, 67, 97, 61, 59, 101, 103, 53, ...]
Then, we use (...)@0
to select the first member of this sequence. Since the lower of the two needs to be selected, the sequence which starts with x - 1
is spliced in first.
Note: Only one of x
and x - 1
can be prime, so it is okay that the spliced sequence starts with x - 1
. Though the sequence could be open on both sides ([x,-1,-∞]
), this would needlessly include x
twice in the sequence. So, for sake of "efficiency", I chose the left-closed version (also because I like to show off Tidy).
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Tidy, 43 bytes
{x:(prime↦splice(]x,-1,-∞],[x,∞]))@0}
Try it online!
Explanation
This is a lambda with parameter x
. This works by creating the following sequence:
[x - 1, x, x - 2, x + 1, x - 3, x + 2, x - 4, x + 3, ...]
This is splicing together the two sequences ]x, -1, -∞]
(left-closed, right-open) and [x, ∞]
(both open).
For x = 80
, this looks like:
[79, 80, 78, 81, 77, 82, 76, 83, 75, 84, 74, 85, ...]
Then, we use f↦s
to select all elements from s
satisfying f
. In this case, we filter out all composite numbers, leaving only the prime ones. For the same x
, this becomes:
[79, 83, 73, 71, 89, 67, 97, 61, 59, 101, 103, 53, ...]
Then, we use (...)@0
to select the first member of this sequence. Since the lower of the two needs to be selected, the sequence which starts with x - 1
is spliced in first.
Note: Only one of x
and x - 1
can be prime, so it is okay that the spliced sequence starts with x - 1
. Though the sequence could be open on both sides ([x,-1,-∞]
), this would needlessly include x
twice in the sequence. So, for sake of "efficiency", I chose the left-closed version (also because I like to show off Tidy).
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Tidy, 43 bytes
{x:(prime↦splice(]x,-1,-∞],[x,∞]))@0}
Try it online!
Explanation
This is a lambda with parameter x
. This works by creating the following sequence:
[x - 1, x, x - 2, x + 1, x - 3, x + 2, x - 4, x + 3, ...]
This is splicing together the two sequences ]x, -1, -∞]
(left-closed, right-open) and [x, ∞]
(both open).
For x = 80
, this looks like:
[79, 80, 78, 81, 77, 82, 76, 83, 75, 84, 74, 85, ...]
Then, we use f↦s
to select all elements from s
satisfying f
. In this case, we filter out all composite numbers, leaving only the prime ones. For the same x
, this becomes:
[79, 83, 73, 71, 89, 67, 97, 61, 59, 101, 103, 53, ...]
Then, we use (...)@0
to select the first member of this sequence. Since the lower of the two needs to be selected, the sequence which starts with x - 1
is spliced in first.
Note: Only one of x
and x - 1
can be prime, so it is okay that the spliced sequence starts with x - 1
. Though the sequence could be open on both sides ([x,-1,-∞]
), this would needlessly include x
twice in the sequence. So, for sake of "efficiency", I chose the left-closed version (also because I like to show off Tidy).
$endgroup$
Tidy, 43 bytes
{x:(prime↦splice(]x,-1,-∞],[x,∞]))@0}
Try it online!
Explanation
This is a lambda with parameter x
. This works by creating the following sequence:
[x - 1, x, x - 2, x + 1, x - 3, x + 2, x - 4, x + 3, ...]
This is splicing together the two sequences ]x, -1, -∞]
(left-closed, right-open) and [x, ∞]
(both open).
For x = 80
, this looks like:
[79, 80, 78, 81, 77, 82, 76, 83, 75, 84, 74, 85, ...]
Then, we use f↦s
to select all elements from s
satisfying f
. In this case, we filter out all composite numbers, leaving only the prime ones. For the same x
, this becomes:
[79, 83, 73, 71, 89, 67, 97, 61, 59, 101, 103, 53, ...]
Then, we use (...)@0
to select the first member of this sequence. Since the lower of the two needs to be selected, the sequence which starts with x - 1
is spliced in first.
Note: Only one of x
and x - 1
can be prime, so it is okay that the spliced sequence starts with x - 1
. Though the sequence could be open on both sides ([x,-1,-∞]
), this would needlessly include x
twice in the sequence. So, for sake of "efficiency", I chose the left-closed version (also because I like to show off Tidy).
answered 6 hours ago
Conor O'BrienConor O'Brien
30.5k264162
30.5k264162
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Python 2, 71 bytes
f=lambda n,k=1,p=1:k<n*3and min(k+n-p%k*2*n,f(n,k+1,p*k*k)-n,key=abs)+n
Try it online!
A recursive function that uses the Wilson's Theorem prime generator. The product p
tracks $(k-1)!^2$, and p%k
is 1 for primes and 0 for non-primes. To make it easy to compare abs(k-n)
for different primes k
, we store k-n
and compare via abs
, adding back n
to get the result k
.
The expression k+n-p%k*2*n
is designed to give k-n
on primes (where p%k=1
), and otherwise a "bad" value of k+n
that's always bigger in absolute value and so doesn't affect the minimum, so that non-primes are passed over.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Python 2, 71 bytes
f=lambda n,k=1,p=1:k<n*3and min(k+n-p%k*2*n,f(n,k+1,p*k*k)-n,key=abs)+n
Try it online!
A recursive function that uses the Wilson's Theorem prime generator. The product p
tracks $(k-1)!^2$, and p%k
is 1 for primes and 0 for non-primes. To make it easy to compare abs(k-n)
for different primes k
, we store k-n
and compare via abs
, adding back n
to get the result k
.
The expression k+n-p%k*2*n
is designed to give k-n
on primes (where p%k=1
), and otherwise a "bad" value of k+n
that's always bigger in absolute value and so doesn't affect the minimum, so that non-primes are passed over.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Python 2, 71 bytes
f=lambda n,k=1,p=1:k<n*3and min(k+n-p%k*2*n,f(n,k+1,p*k*k)-n,key=abs)+n
Try it online!
A recursive function that uses the Wilson's Theorem prime generator. The product p
tracks $(k-1)!^2$, and p%k
is 1 for primes and 0 for non-primes. To make it easy to compare abs(k-n)
for different primes k
, we store k-n
and compare via abs
, adding back n
to get the result k
.
The expression k+n-p%k*2*n
is designed to give k-n
on primes (where p%k=1
), and otherwise a "bad" value of k+n
that's always bigger in absolute value and so doesn't affect the minimum, so that non-primes are passed over.
$endgroup$
Python 2, 71 bytes
f=lambda n,k=1,p=1:k<n*3and min(k+n-p%k*2*n,f(n,k+1,p*k*k)-n,key=abs)+n
Try it online!
A recursive function that uses the Wilson's Theorem prime generator. The product p
tracks $(k-1)!^2$, and p%k
is 1 for primes and 0 for non-primes. To make it easy to compare abs(k-n)
for different primes k
, we store k-n
and compare via abs
, adding back n
to get the result k
.
The expression k+n-p%k*2*n
is designed to give k-n
on primes (where p%k=1
), and otherwise a "bad" value of k+n
that's always bigger in absolute value and so doesn't affect the minimum, so that non-primes are passed over.
answered 4 hours ago
xnorxnor
93.1k18190448
93.1k18190448
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
C# (Visual C# Interactive Compiler), 112 bytes
g=>Enumerable.Range(2,2<<20).Where(x=>Enumerable.Range(1,x).Count(y=>x%y<1)<3).OrderBy(x=>Math.Abs(x-g)).First()
Try it online!
Left shifts by 20 in submission but 10 in TIO so that TIO terminates for test cases.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
C# (Visual C# Interactive Compiler), 112 bytes
g=>Enumerable.Range(2,2<<20).Where(x=>Enumerable.Range(1,x).Count(y=>x%y<1)<3).OrderBy(x=>Math.Abs(x-g)).First()
Try it online!
Left shifts by 20 in submission but 10 in TIO so that TIO terminates for test cases.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
C# (Visual C# Interactive Compiler), 112 bytes
g=>Enumerable.Range(2,2<<20).Where(x=>Enumerable.Range(1,x).Count(y=>x%y<1)<3).OrderBy(x=>Math.Abs(x-g)).First()
Try it online!
Left shifts by 20 in submission but 10 in TIO so that TIO terminates for test cases.
$endgroup$
C# (Visual C# Interactive Compiler), 112 bytes
g=>Enumerable.Range(2,2<<20).Where(x=>Enumerable.Range(1,x).Count(y=>x%y<1)<3).OrderBy(x=>Math.Abs(x-g)).First()
Try it online!
Left shifts by 20 in submission but 10 in TIO so that TIO terminates for test cases.
answered 11 hours ago
Expired DataExpired Data
3686
3686
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
APL (Dyalog Extended), 20 bytesSBCS
⊢(⊃>/⍤|⍤-⌽⊢)¯4 4⍭3⌈⊢
Try it online!
⊢
the argument
3⌈
max of 3 and that
¯4 4⍭
the previous and next primes`
⊢(
…)
apply the following infix tacit function to that, with the original argument as left argument:
⊢
the primes
…⌽
cyclically rotate them the following number of steps:
-
the original argument minus the primes
⍤
then
|
absolute value of that
⍤
then
>/
Boolean (0/1) whether the left is greater than the right (i.e. 1 if next is closer)
⊃
pick the first one (i.e. previous if previous is closer and next if next is closer)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
APL (Dyalog Extended), 20 bytesSBCS
⊢(⊃>/⍤|⍤-⌽⊢)¯4 4⍭3⌈⊢
Try it online!
⊢
the argument
3⌈
max of 3 and that
¯4 4⍭
the previous and next primes`
⊢(
…)
apply the following infix tacit function to that, with the original argument as left argument:
⊢
the primes
…⌽
cyclically rotate them the following number of steps:
-
the original argument minus the primes
⍤
then
|
absolute value of that
⍤
then
>/
Boolean (0/1) whether the left is greater than the right (i.e. 1 if next is closer)
⊃
pick the first one (i.e. previous if previous is closer and next if next is closer)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
APL (Dyalog Extended), 20 bytesSBCS
⊢(⊃>/⍤|⍤-⌽⊢)¯4 4⍭3⌈⊢
Try it online!
⊢
the argument
3⌈
max of 3 and that
¯4 4⍭
the previous and next primes`
⊢(
…)
apply the following infix tacit function to that, with the original argument as left argument:
⊢
the primes
…⌽
cyclically rotate them the following number of steps:
-
the original argument minus the primes
⍤
then
|
absolute value of that
⍤
then
>/
Boolean (0/1) whether the left is greater than the right (i.e. 1 if next is closer)
⊃
pick the first one (i.e. previous if previous is closer and next if next is closer)
$endgroup$
APL (Dyalog Extended), 20 bytesSBCS
⊢(⊃>/⍤|⍤-⌽⊢)¯4 4⍭3⌈⊢
Try it online!
⊢
the argument
3⌈
max of 3 and that
¯4 4⍭
the previous and next primes`
⊢(
…)
apply the following infix tacit function to that, with the original argument as left argument:
⊢
the primes
…⌽
cyclically rotate them the following number of steps:
-
the original argument minus the primes
⍤
then
|
absolute value of that
⍤
then
>/
Boolean (0/1) whether the left is greater than the right (i.e. 1 if next is closer)
⊃
pick the first one (i.e. previous if previous is closer and next if next is closer)
answered 11 hours ago
AdámAdám
28.6k276207
28.6k276207
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Swift, 186 bytes
func p(a:Int){let b=q(a:a,b:-1),c=q(a:a,b:1);print(a-b<=c-a ? b:c)}
func q(a:Int,b:Int)->Int{var k=max(a,2),c=2;while k>c && c != a/2{if k%c==0{k+=b;c=2}else{c=c==2 ? c+1:c+2}};return k}
Try it online!
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Swift, 186 bytes
func p(a:Int){let b=q(a:a,b:-1),c=q(a:a,b:1);print(a-b<=c-a ? b:c)}
func q(a:Int,b:Int)->Int{var k=max(a,2),c=2;while k>c && c != a/2{if k%c==0{k+=b;c=2}else{c=c==2 ? c+1:c+2}};return k}
Try it online!
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Swift, 186 bytes
func p(a:Int){let b=q(a:a,b:-1),c=q(a:a,b:1);print(a-b<=c-a ? b:c)}
func q(a:Int,b:Int)->Int{var k=max(a,2),c=2;while k>c && c != a/2{if k%c==0{k+=b;c=2}else{c=c==2 ? c+1:c+2}};return k}
Try it online!
$endgroup$
Swift, 186 bytes
func p(a:Int){let b=q(a:a,b:-1),c=q(a:a,b:1);print(a-b<=c-a ? b:c)}
func q(a:Int,b:Int)->Int{var k=max(a,2),c=2;while k>c && c != a/2{if k%c==0{k+=b;c=2}else{c=c==2 ? c+1:c+2}};return k}
Try it online!
answered 10 hours ago
onnowebonnoweb
1613
1613
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Jelly, 14 bytes
ÆpæRÆnạÞƲ2>?2Ḣ
Try it online!
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Jelly, 14 bytes
ÆpæRÆnạÞƲ2>?2Ḣ
Try it online!
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Jelly, 14 bytes
ÆpæRÆnạÞƲ2>?2Ḣ
Try it online!
$endgroup$
Jelly, 14 bytes
ÆpæRÆnạÞƲ2>?2Ḣ
Try it online!
answered 9 hours ago
Erik the OutgolferErik the Outgolfer
32.9k429106
32.9k429106
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
C# (Visual C# Interactive Compiler), 96 bytes
n=>{for(int i=0,j;;)if((j=n+i/2*(i++%2*2-1))>1&&Enumerable.Range(2,j-2).All(d=>j%d>0))return j;}
Try it online!
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
C# (Visual C# Interactive Compiler), 96 bytes
n=>{for(int i=0,j;;)if((j=n+i/2*(i++%2*2-1))>1&&Enumerable.Range(2,j-2).All(d=>j%d>0))return j;}
Try it online!
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
C# (Visual C# Interactive Compiler), 96 bytes
n=>{for(int i=0,j;;)if((j=n+i/2*(i++%2*2-1))>1&&Enumerable.Range(2,j-2).All(d=>j%d>0))return j;}
Try it online!
$endgroup$
C# (Visual C# Interactive Compiler), 96 bytes
n=>{for(int i=0,j;;)if((j=n+i/2*(i++%2*2-1))>1&&Enumerable.Range(2,j-2).All(d=>j%d>0))return j;}
Try it online!
answered 9 hours ago
Embodiment of IgnoranceEmbodiment of Ignorance
2,218126
2,218126
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Zsh, 101 92 91 bytes
-9 by collapsing the body into the head of p
's loop, -1 from using i=j
instead of i=$1
in main loop.
p(){for ((n=2;n<$1&&$1%n++;)):
(($1==n))&&<<<$1}
j=$1
for ((i=j;;++j&&--i))p $i||p $j&&exit
Try it online!
Try it online!
57 48 bytes to the prime testing function, 43 42 bytes to the main loop (1 byte to the newline between them):
p(){ # prime function: takes one input, outputs via return code
for (( n = 2; n < $1 && $1 % n++; )) # divisibility check in loop header
: # no-op loop body
(( $1 == n )) && # if we looped up to $1:
<<< $1 # echo out $1. Otherwise, this will return false
}
For the last condition, we can't use the shorter (($1-n))||
, because we need to return false to the main loop if we didn't find a prime. We print in the function to avoid complexity in the main loop.
j=$1 # set i = j = $1. Doing one in and one out is smallest
for (( i = j; ; ++j && --i )) # loop indefinitely, increment and decrement
p $i || p $j && exit # if either $i or $j was a prime, exit
Conditionals are left-associative, which we take advantage of here. We do test the starting number twice to make the decrement logic simpler.
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Zsh, 101 92 91 bytes
-9 by collapsing the body into the head of p
's loop, -1 from using i=j
instead of i=$1
in main loop.
p(){for ((n=2;n<$1&&$1%n++;)):
(($1==n))&&<<<$1}
j=$1
for ((i=j;;++j&&--i))p $i||p $j&&exit
Try it online!
Try it online!
57 48 bytes to the prime testing function, 43 42 bytes to the main loop (1 byte to the newline between them):
p(){ # prime function: takes one input, outputs via return code
for (( n = 2; n < $1 && $1 % n++; )) # divisibility check in loop header
: # no-op loop body
(( $1 == n )) && # if we looped up to $1:
<<< $1 # echo out $1. Otherwise, this will return false
}
For the last condition, we can't use the shorter (($1-n))||
, because we need to return false to the main loop if we didn't find a prime. We print in the function to avoid complexity in the main loop.
j=$1 # set i = j = $1. Doing one in and one out is smallest
for (( i = j; ; ++j && --i )) # loop indefinitely, increment and decrement
p $i || p $j && exit # if either $i or $j was a prime, exit
Conditionals are left-associative, which we take advantage of here. We do test the starting number twice to make the decrement logic simpler.
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Zsh, 101 92 91 bytes
-9 by collapsing the body into the head of p
's loop, -1 from using i=j
instead of i=$1
in main loop.
p(){for ((n=2;n<$1&&$1%n++;)):
(($1==n))&&<<<$1}
j=$1
for ((i=j;;++j&&--i))p $i||p $j&&exit
Try it online!
Try it online!
57 48 bytes to the prime testing function, 43 42 bytes to the main loop (1 byte to the newline between them):
p(){ # prime function: takes one input, outputs via return code
for (( n = 2; n < $1 && $1 % n++; )) # divisibility check in loop header
: # no-op loop body
(( $1 == n )) && # if we looped up to $1:
<<< $1 # echo out $1. Otherwise, this will return false
}
For the last condition, we can't use the shorter (($1-n))||
, because we need to return false to the main loop if we didn't find a prime. We print in the function to avoid complexity in the main loop.
j=$1 # set i = j = $1. Doing one in and one out is smallest
for (( i = j; ; ++j && --i )) # loop indefinitely, increment and decrement
p $i || p $j && exit # if either $i or $j was a prime, exit
Conditionals are left-associative, which we take advantage of here. We do test the starting number twice to make the decrement logic simpler.
New contributor
$endgroup$
Zsh, 101 92 91 bytes
-9 by collapsing the body into the head of p
's loop, -1 from using i=j
instead of i=$1
in main loop.
p(){for ((n=2;n<$1&&$1%n++;)):
(($1==n))&&<<<$1}
j=$1
for ((i=j;;++j&&--i))p $i||p $j&&exit
Try it online!
Try it online!
57 48 bytes to the prime testing function, 43 42 bytes to the main loop (1 byte to the newline between them):
p(){ # prime function: takes one input, outputs via return code
for (( n = 2; n < $1 && $1 % n++; )) # divisibility check in loop header
: # no-op loop body
(( $1 == n )) && # if we looped up to $1:
<<< $1 # echo out $1. Otherwise, this will return false
}
For the last condition, we can't use the shorter (($1-n))||
, because we need to return false to the main loop if we didn't find a prime. We print in the function to avoid complexity in the main loop.
j=$1 # set i = j = $1. Doing one in and one out is smallest
for (( i = j; ; ++j && --i )) # loop indefinitely, increment and decrement
p $i || p $j && exit # if either $i or $j was a prime, exit
Conditionals are left-associative, which we take advantage of here. We do test the starting number twice to make the decrement logic simpler.
New contributor
edited 8 hours ago
New contributor
answered 9 hours ago
GammaFunctionGammaFunction
1716
1716
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
C, 122 bytes
#define r return
p(a,i){if(a<2)r 0;i=1;while(++i<a)if(a%i<1)r 0;r 1;}c(a,b){b=a;while(1){if(p(b))r b;if(p(--a))r a;b++;}}
Use it calling function c() and passing as argument the number, it should return the closest prime.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
C, 122 bytes
#define r return
p(a,i){if(a<2)r 0;i=1;while(++i<a)if(a%i<1)r 0;r 1;}c(a,b){b=a;while(1){if(p(b))r b;if(p(--a))r a;b++;}}
Use it calling function c() and passing as argument the number, it should return the closest prime.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
C, 122 bytes
#define r return
p(a,i){if(a<2)r 0;i=1;while(++i<a)if(a%i<1)r 0;r 1;}c(a,b){b=a;while(1){if(p(b))r b;if(p(--a))r a;b++;}}
Use it calling function c() and passing as argument the number, it should return the closest prime.
$endgroup$
C, 122 bytes
#define r return
p(a,i){if(a<2)r 0;i=1;while(++i<a)if(a%i<1)r 0;r 1;}c(a,b){b=a;while(1){if(p(b))r b;if(p(--a))r a;b++;}}
Use it calling function c() and passing as argument the number, it should return the closest prime.
answered 8 hours ago
Lince AssassinoLince Assassino
914
914
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Python 2, 93 bytes
lambda n:sorted(range(1,3*n),key=lambda x:abs(x-n)if all(x%k for k in range(2,x))else 2*n)[0]
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
You don't need thef=
in the start
$endgroup$
– Embodiment of Ignorance
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@EmbodimentofIgnorance Thanks, fixed that along with the range and non-prime penalty criteria that was causing n=1 to fail
$endgroup$
– deustice
7 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
The primality check doesn't work for Fermat pseudoprimes such as 341=31*11 which it calls prime.
$endgroup$
– xnor
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@xnor Fixed, thanks
$endgroup$
– deustice
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Python 2, 93 bytes
lambda n:sorted(range(1,3*n),key=lambda x:abs(x-n)if all(x%k for k in range(2,x))else 2*n)[0]
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
You don't need thef=
in the start
$endgroup$
– Embodiment of Ignorance
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@EmbodimentofIgnorance Thanks, fixed that along with the range and non-prime penalty criteria that was causing n=1 to fail
$endgroup$
– deustice
7 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
The primality check doesn't work for Fermat pseudoprimes such as 341=31*11 which it calls prime.
$endgroup$
– xnor
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@xnor Fixed, thanks
$endgroup$
– deustice
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Python 2, 93 bytes
lambda n:sorted(range(1,3*n),key=lambda x:abs(x-n)if all(x%k for k in range(2,x))else 2*n)[0]
$endgroup$
Python 2, 93 bytes
lambda n:sorted(range(1,3*n),key=lambda x:abs(x-n)if all(x%k for k in range(2,x))else 2*n)[0]
edited 6 hours ago
answered 9 hours ago
deusticedeustice
614
614
1
$begingroup$
You don't need thef=
in the start
$endgroup$
– Embodiment of Ignorance
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@EmbodimentofIgnorance Thanks, fixed that along with the range and non-prime penalty criteria that was causing n=1 to fail
$endgroup$
– deustice
7 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
The primality check doesn't work for Fermat pseudoprimes such as 341=31*11 which it calls prime.
$endgroup$
– xnor
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@xnor Fixed, thanks
$endgroup$
– deustice
6 hours ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
You don't need thef=
in the start
$endgroup$
– Embodiment of Ignorance
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@EmbodimentofIgnorance Thanks, fixed that along with the range and non-prime penalty criteria that was causing n=1 to fail
$endgroup$
– deustice
7 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
The primality check doesn't work for Fermat pseudoprimes such as 341=31*11 which it calls prime.
$endgroup$
– xnor
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@xnor Fixed, thanks
$endgroup$
– deustice
6 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
You don't need the
f=
in the start$endgroup$
– Embodiment of Ignorance
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
You don't need the
f=
in the start$endgroup$
– Embodiment of Ignorance
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@EmbodimentofIgnorance Thanks, fixed that along with the range and non-prime penalty criteria that was causing n=1 to fail
$endgroup$
– deustice
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@EmbodimentofIgnorance Thanks, fixed that along with the range and non-prime penalty criteria that was causing n=1 to fail
$endgroup$
– deustice
7 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
The primality check doesn't work for Fermat pseudoprimes such as 341=31*11 which it calls prime.
$endgroup$
– xnor
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
The primality check doesn't work for Fermat pseudoprimes such as 341=31*11 which it calls prime.
$endgroup$
– xnor
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@xnor Fixed, thanks
$endgroup$
– deustice
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
@xnor Fixed, thanks
$endgroup$
– deustice
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
J, 19 15 bytes
(0{]/:|@-)p:@i.
Try it online!
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
J, 19 15 bytes
(0{]/:|@-)p:@i.
Try it online!
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
J, 19 15 bytes
(0{]/:|@-)p:@i.
Try it online!
$endgroup$
J, 19 15 bytes
(0{]/:|@-)p:@i.
Try it online!
edited 5 hours ago
answered 8 hours ago
Galen IvanovGalen Ivanov
7,30211034
7,30211034
add a comment |
add a comment |
If this is an answer to a challenge…
…Be sure to follow the challenge specification. However, please refrain from exploiting obvious loopholes. Answers abusing any of the standard loopholes are considered invalid. If you think a specification is unclear or underspecified, comment on the question instead.
…Try to optimize your score. For instance, answers to code-golf challenges should attempt to be as short as possible. You can always include a readable version of the code in addition to the competitive one.
Explanations of your answer make it more interesting to read and are very much encouraged.…Include a short header which indicates the language(s) of your code and its score, as defined by the challenge.
More generally…
…Please make sure to answer the question and provide sufficient detail.
…Avoid asking for help, clarification or responding to other answers (use comments instead).
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodegolf.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f182305%2freturn-the-closest-prime-number%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
$begingroup$
Hi and welcome to PPCG!. To avoid down voting due to lack of quality I suggest you to post it to the sandbox first and after a couple of days post it here
$endgroup$
– Luis felipe De jesus Munoz
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
This is one of the outputs requested in this challenge.
$endgroup$
– Arnauld
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
Very closely related but not quite identical.
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Arnauld I saw that one, but I thought that they were different enough to warrant a new question.
$endgroup$
– Bobawob
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Giuseppe Yeah, I found out about that one after already posting...
$endgroup$
– Bobawob
12 hours ago