Compute $lim_{xtoinfty} x lfloor frac{1}{x} rfloor$












1














I'm working out a limit and I'm not sure if my assumption is considered rigorous
$$lim_{xtoinfty} xleftlfloorfrac1xrightrfloor$$
I supposed that $0leq xleftlfloorfrac1xrightrfloor leq leftlfloorfrac1xrightrfloor$ since $x$ is approaching $infty$ $($thus $x > 1$$)$ and to get the answer $0$.



Any mistakes here?






calculus limits floor-function







share|cite|improve this question





























    1














    I'm working out a limit and I'm not sure if my assumption is considered rigorous
    $$lim_{xtoinfty} xleftlfloorfrac1xrightrfloor$$
    I supposed that $0leq xleftlfloorfrac1xrightrfloor leq leftlfloorfrac1xrightrfloor$ since $x$ is approaching $infty$ $($thus $x > 1$$)$ and to get the answer $0$.



    Any mistakes here?






    calculus limits floor-function







    share|cite|improve this question



























      1












      1








      1


      1





      I'm working out a limit and I'm not sure if my assumption is considered rigorous
      $$lim_{xtoinfty} xleftlfloorfrac1xrightrfloor$$
      I supposed that $0leq xleftlfloorfrac1xrightrfloor leq leftlfloorfrac1xrightrfloor$ since $x$ is approaching $infty$ $($thus $x > 1$$)$ and to get the answer $0$.



      Any mistakes here?






      calculus limits floor-function







      share|cite|improve this question















      I'm working out a limit and I'm not sure if my assumption is considered rigorous
      $$lim_{xtoinfty} xleftlfloorfrac1xrightrfloor$$
      I supposed that $0leq xleftlfloorfrac1xrightrfloor leq leftlfloorfrac1xrightrfloor$ since $x$ is approaching $infty$ $($thus $x > 1$$)$ and to get the answer $0$.



      Any mistakes here?






      calculus limits floor-function




      calculus limits floor-function






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 24 at 23:17









      Xander Henderson

      14.1k103554




      14.1k103554










      asked Dec 24 at 12:53







      user531476





























          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2














          No mistakes. But, can you see it in terms of sequences instead? That will be much easier. $limlimits_{x rightarrow infty}$ can be viewed as a sequence $leftlbrace x_n rightrbrace$, where $forall M > 0, exists N in mathbb{N}$ such that $x_n > M$. This tells us something special for the choice of $M geq 1$. Once we choose $M geq 1$, we will get a stage after which $x_n > 1$ and hence $leftlfloor{dfrac{1}{x_n}}rightrfloor = 0$. Hence, the image sequence is evetually zero and $limlimits_{x rightarrow infty} x leftlfloor{dfrac{1}{x}}rightrfloor = 0$.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Thank you, I see what you did there. (right click the equation and under "Show Math As" select Tex or MathML ;)
            – user531476
            Dec 24 at 13:34





















          6














          You make it sound like the reason that $xlfloorfrac{1}{x}rfloorleqlfloorfrac{1}{x}rfloor$ is true for positive $x$ is because $xyleq y$ for positive $x$ and $y$, but this is not so. Instead, the reason it is true is because if $xleq 1$ then $xyleq y$ for positive $y$ and if $x>1$ then $lfloorfrac{1}{x}rfloor=0$ so that $xlfloorfrac{1}{x}rfloor=0$ too.



          It is far simpler just to note that if $x>1$ then $lfloorfrac{1}{x}rfloor=0$ and hence $xlfloorfrac{1}{x}rfloor=0$, giving us $lim_{xtoinfty}xlfloorfrac{1}{x}rfloor=0$.






          share|cite|improve this answer





























            2














            The function is $0$ for $x>1$. Alternatively, substitute $m=1/x$. This limit is the same as $displaystylelim_{mto0^+}frac{lfloor mrfloor}m$, which easily evaluates to $0$.






            share|cite|improve this answer





















            • How does it easily evaluate to 0?
              – user531476
              Dec 24 at 13:39












            • $displaystylelim_{mto0^+}frac{lfloor mrfloor}m=displaystylelim_{mto0^+}frac{0}m=0$. This is due to the fact that $lfloor mrfloor$ is exactly $0$, but $m$ only tends to $0$
              – Shubham Johri
              Dec 24 at 13:41












            • Oh, I thought we take that as $frac{0}{0}$. Thank you!
              – user531476
              Dec 24 at 14:28











            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3051229%2fcompute-lim-x-to-infty-x-lfloor-frac1x-rfloor%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown
























            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes








            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2














            No mistakes. But, can you see it in terms of sequences instead? That will be much easier. $limlimits_{x rightarrow infty}$ can be viewed as a sequence $leftlbrace x_n rightrbrace$, where $forall M > 0, exists N in mathbb{N}$ such that $x_n > M$. This tells us something special for the choice of $M geq 1$. Once we choose $M geq 1$, we will get a stage after which $x_n > 1$ and hence $leftlfloor{dfrac{1}{x_n}}rightrfloor = 0$. Hence, the image sequence is evetually zero and $limlimits_{x rightarrow infty} x leftlfloor{dfrac{1}{x}}rightrfloor = 0$.






            share|cite|improve this answer























            • Thank you, I see what you did there. (right click the equation and under "Show Math As" select Tex or MathML ;)
              – user531476
              Dec 24 at 13:34


















            2














            No mistakes. But, can you see it in terms of sequences instead? That will be much easier. $limlimits_{x rightarrow infty}$ can be viewed as a sequence $leftlbrace x_n rightrbrace$, where $forall M > 0, exists N in mathbb{N}$ such that $x_n > M$. This tells us something special for the choice of $M geq 1$. Once we choose $M geq 1$, we will get a stage after which $x_n > 1$ and hence $leftlfloor{dfrac{1}{x_n}}rightrfloor = 0$. Hence, the image sequence is evetually zero and $limlimits_{x rightarrow infty} x leftlfloor{dfrac{1}{x}}rightrfloor = 0$.






            share|cite|improve this answer























            • Thank you, I see what you did there. (right click the equation and under "Show Math As" select Tex or MathML ;)
              – user531476
              Dec 24 at 13:34
















            2












            2








            2






            No mistakes. But, can you see it in terms of sequences instead? That will be much easier. $limlimits_{x rightarrow infty}$ can be viewed as a sequence $leftlbrace x_n rightrbrace$, where $forall M > 0, exists N in mathbb{N}$ such that $x_n > M$. This tells us something special for the choice of $M geq 1$. Once we choose $M geq 1$, we will get a stage after which $x_n > 1$ and hence $leftlfloor{dfrac{1}{x_n}}rightrfloor = 0$. Hence, the image sequence is evetually zero and $limlimits_{x rightarrow infty} x leftlfloor{dfrac{1}{x}}rightrfloor = 0$.






            share|cite|improve this answer














            No mistakes. But, can you see it in terms of sequences instead? That will be much easier. $limlimits_{x rightarrow infty}$ can be viewed as a sequence $leftlbrace x_n rightrbrace$, where $forall M > 0, exists N in mathbb{N}$ such that $x_n > M$. This tells us something special for the choice of $M geq 1$. Once we choose $M geq 1$, we will get a stage after which $x_n > 1$ and hence $leftlfloor{dfrac{1}{x_n}}rightrfloor = 0$. Hence, the image sequence is evetually zero and $limlimits_{x rightarrow infty} x leftlfloor{dfrac{1}{x}}rightrfloor = 0$.







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Dec 24 at 15:41









            BPP

            2,170927




            2,170927










            answered Dec 24 at 13:00









            Aniruddha Deshmukh

            899418




            899418












            • Thank you, I see what you did there. (right click the equation and under "Show Math As" select Tex or MathML ;)
              – user531476
              Dec 24 at 13:34




















            • Thank you, I see what you did there. (right click the equation and under "Show Math As" select Tex or MathML ;)
              – user531476
              Dec 24 at 13:34


















            Thank you, I see what you did there. (right click the equation and under "Show Math As" select Tex or MathML ;)
            – user531476
            Dec 24 at 13:34






            Thank you, I see what you did there. (right click the equation and under "Show Math As" select Tex or MathML ;)
            – user531476
            Dec 24 at 13:34













            6














            You make it sound like the reason that $xlfloorfrac{1}{x}rfloorleqlfloorfrac{1}{x}rfloor$ is true for positive $x$ is because $xyleq y$ for positive $x$ and $y$, but this is not so. Instead, the reason it is true is because if $xleq 1$ then $xyleq y$ for positive $y$ and if $x>1$ then $lfloorfrac{1}{x}rfloor=0$ so that $xlfloorfrac{1}{x}rfloor=0$ too.



            It is far simpler just to note that if $x>1$ then $lfloorfrac{1}{x}rfloor=0$ and hence $xlfloorfrac{1}{x}rfloor=0$, giving us $lim_{xtoinfty}xlfloorfrac{1}{x}rfloor=0$.






            share|cite|improve this answer


























              6














              You make it sound like the reason that $xlfloorfrac{1}{x}rfloorleqlfloorfrac{1}{x}rfloor$ is true for positive $x$ is because $xyleq y$ for positive $x$ and $y$, but this is not so. Instead, the reason it is true is because if $xleq 1$ then $xyleq y$ for positive $y$ and if $x>1$ then $lfloorfrac{1}{x}rfloor=0$ so that $xlfloorfrac{1}{x}rfloor=0$ too.



              It is far simpler just to note that if $x>1$ then $lfloorfrac{1}{x}rfloor=0$ and hence $xlfloorfrac{1}{x}rfloor=0$, giving us $lim_{xtoinfty}xlfloorfrac{1}{x}rfloor=0$.






              share|cite|improve this answer
























                6












                6








                6






                You make it sound like the reason that $xlfloorfrac{1}{x}rfloorleqlfloorfrac{1}{x}rfloor$ is true for positive $x$ is because $xyleq y$ for positive $x$ and $y$, but this is not so. Instead, the reason it is true is because if $xleq 1$ then $xyleq y$ for positive $y$ and if $x>1$ then $lfloorfrac{1}{x}rfloor=0$ so that $xlfloorfrac{1}{x}rfloor=0$ too.



                It is far simpler just to note that if $x>1$ then $lfloorfrac{1}{x}rfloor=0$ and hence $xlfloorfrac{1}{x}rfloor=0$, giving us $lim_{xtoinfty}xlfloorfrac{1}{x}rfloor=0$.






                share|cite|improve this answer












                You make it sound like the reason that $xlfloorfrac{1}{x}rfloorleqlfloorfrac{1}{x}rfloor$ is true for positive $x$ is because $xyleq y$ for positive $x$ and $y$, but this is not so. Instead, the reason it is true is because if $xleq 1$ then $xyleq y$ for positive $y$ and if $x>1$ then $lfloorfrac{1}{x}rfloor=0$ so that $xlfloorfrac{1}{x}rfloor=0$ too.



                It is far simpler just to note that if $x>1$ then $lfloorfrac{1}{x}rfloor=0$ and hence $xlfloorfrac{1}{x}rfloor=0$, giving us $lim_{xtoinfty}xlfloorfrac{1}{x}rfloor=0$.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Dec 24 at 13:03









                Ben W

                1,363513




                1,363513























                    2














                    The function is $0$ for $x>1$. Alternatively, substitute $m=1/x$. This limit is the same as $displaystylelim_{mto0^+}frac{lfloor mrfloor}m$, which easily evaluates to $0$.






                    share|cite|improve this answer





















                    • How does it easily evaluate to 0?
                      – user531476
                      Dec 24 at 13:39












                    • $displaystylelim_{mto0^+}frac{lfloor mrfloor}m=displaystylelim_{mto0^+}frac{0}m=0$. This is due to the fact that $lfloor mrfloor$ is exactly $0$, but $m$ only tends to $0$
                      – Shubham Johri
                      Dec 24 at 13:41












                    • Oh, I thought we take that as $frac{0}{0}$. Thank you!
                      – user531476
                      Dec 24 at 14:28
















                    2














                    The function is $0$ for $x>1$. Alternatively, substitute $m=1/x$. This limit is the same as $displaystylelim_{mto0^+}frac{lfloor mrfloor}m$, which easily evaluates to $0$.






                    share|cite|improve this answer





















                    • How does it easily evaluate to 0?
                      – user531476
                      Dec 24 at 13:39












                    • $displaystylelim_{mto0^+}frac{lfloor mrfloor}m=displaystylelim_{mto0^+}frac{0}m=0$. This is due to the fact that $lfloor mrfloor$ is exactly $0$, but $m$ only tends to $0$
                      – Shubham Johri
                      Dec 24 at 13:41












                    • Oh, I thought we take that as $frac{0}{0}$. Thank you!
                      – user531476
                      Dec 24 at 14:28














                    2












                    2








                    2






                    The function is $0$ for $x>1$. Alternatively, substitute $m=1/x$. This limit is the same as $displaystylelim_{mto0^+}frac{lfloor mrfloor}m$, which easily evaluates to $0$.






                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    The function is $0$ for $x>1$. Alternatively, substitute $m=1/x$. This limit is the same as $displaystylelim_{mto0^+}frac{lfloor mrfloor}m$, which easily evaluates to $0$.







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered Dec 24 at 13:33









                    Shubham Johri

                    3,826716




                    3,826716












                    • How does it easily evaluate to 0?
                      – user531476
                      Dec 24 at 13:39












                    • $displaystylelim_{mto0^+}frac{lfloor mrfloor}m=displaystylelim_{mto0^+}frac{0}m=0$. This is due to the fact that $lfloor mrfloor$ is exactly $0$, but $m$ only tends to $0$
                      – Shubham Johri
                      Dec 24 at 13:41












                    • Oh, I thought we take that as $frac{0}{0}$. Thank you!
                      – user531476
                      Dec 24 at 14:28


















                    • How does it easily evaluate to 0?
                      – user531476
                      Dec 24 at 13:39












                    • $displaystylelim_{mto0^+}frac{lfloor mrfloor}m=displaystylelim_{mto0^+}frac{0}m=0$. This is due to the fact that $lfloor mrfloor$ is exactly $0$, but $m$ only tends to $0$
                      – Shubham Johri
                      Dec 24 at 13:41












                    • Oh, I thought we take that as $frac{0}{0}$. Thank you!
                      – user531476
                      Dec 24 at 14:28
















                    How does it easily evaluate to 0?
                    – user531476
                    Dec 24 at 13:39






                    How does it easily evaluate to 0?
                    – user531476
                    Dec 24 at 13:39














                    $displaystylelim_{mto0^+}frac{lfloor mrfloor}m=displaystylelim_{mto0^+}frac{0}m=0$. This is due to the fact that $lfloor mrfloor$ is exactly $0$, but $m$ only tends to $0$
                    – Shubham Johri
                    Dec 24 at 13:41






                    $displaystylelim_{mto0^+}frac{lfloor mrfloor}m=displaystylelim_{mto0^+}frac{0}m=0$. This is due to the fact that $lfloor mrfloor$ is exactly $0$, but $m$ only tends to $0$
                    – Shubham Johri
                    Dec 24 at 13:41














                    Oh, I thought we take that as $frac{0}{0}$. Thank you!
                    – user531476
                    Dec 24 at 14:28




                    Oh, I thought we take that as $frac{0}{0}$. Thank you!
                    – user531476
                    Dec 24 at 14:28


















                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid …



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid …



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3051229%2fcompute-lim-x-to-infty-x-lfloor-frac1x-rfloor%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    -

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Сан-Квентин

                    Image
                    Сан-Квентин Местоположение Сан-Квентин, Калифорния Координаты 37°56′13″ с. ш. 122°29′20″ з. д. H G Я O L Текущий статус Действует Режим безопасности минимальный и максимальный Количество мест 3 302 Открытие Июнь 1852 Находится в ведомстве California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Начальник Mike Martel, начальник  Сан-Квентин на Викискладе Сан-Квентин (англ.  San Quentin ) — тюрьма, располагающаяся на 432 акрах (около 1,7 км²), на мысе Сан-Квентин, в округе Марин, штат Калифорния, США. Тюрьма штата Калифорния Сан-Квентин была открыта в июле 1852 года и является старейшей в штате. Она была построена заключёнными, которые проживали в течение строительства на тюремном судне Вабан. В Сан-Квентине отбывали наказание и мужчины, и женщины до 1934 года, когда построили женскую тюрьму в Техачапи и туда перевели всех заключённых женщин. В Сан-Квентине приводятся в исполнение смертные казни, для этого имеется газовая камера, но...
                    Read more

                    8-я гвардейская общевойсковая армия

                    Image
                    8-я гвардейская общевойсковая ордена Ленина армия Награды: Войска: РККА → Советская армия → СВ России Род войск: Формирование: 1943 Расформирование (преобразование): 1992 Предшественник: 62-я армия (1942—43) → 8-я гвардейская общевойсковая армия (1943—92) → 8-й гвардейский армейский корпус (1992—98) Боевой путь Изюм-Барвенковская операция Донбасская операция Запорожская операция Битва за Днепр Днепропетровская операция Березнеговато-Снигирёвская операция Одесская операция Люблин-Брестская операция Варшавско-Познанская операция Восточно-Померанская операция Берлинская наступательная операция У этого термина существуют и другие значения, см. 8-я армия. Фотография Гвардейского Красного Знамени (лицевая сторона) 8-й гвардейской армии , образца 1943 года. Фотография Гвардейского Красного Знамени (оборотная сторона) 8-й гвардейской армии , образца 1943 года. 8-я гвардейская общевойсковая ордена Ленина армия  — гвардейское фор...
                    Read more

                    Алькесар

                    Image
                    Муниципалитет Алькесар Alquézar Герб 42°10′16″ с. ш. 0°01′27″ в. д. H G Я O L Страна Испания   Испания Автономное сообщество Арагон Провинция Уэска Комарка Сомонтано-де-Барбастро Алькальд Хосе Марияно Альтемир Ласкорс (ИСРП) История и география Площадь 32,36 км² Высота НУМ 660 м Часовой пояс UTC+1, летом UTC+2 Население Население 313 человек ( 2010 ) Плотность 9,92 чел./км² Этнохороним alquezarano/-a Цифровые идентификаторы Телефонный код +34 974 Почтовые индексы 22112 Автомобильный код HU alquezar.org   (исп.) Показать/скрыть карты Алькесар Алькесар Алькесар  Аудио, фото и видео на Викискладе Алькесар (исп.  Alquézar ) — муниципалитет в Испании, входит в провинцию Уэска, в составе автономного сообщества Арагон. Муниципалитет находится в составе района (комарки) Сомонтано-де-Барбастро. Занимает площадь 32,36 км². Население — 321 челове...
                    Read more