Removing space between sum and its correspondent value with only one number representing all the equations
In fact, I want to know how can I remove space in the second sum of the first expression and also to have a good equations design represented with only one number. Here is the code:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools}
begin{document}
begin{align}
U_{c}(1) &= sum_{n=1}^{4}( U_{e}(n)timessum_{k=n+10}^{14}U_{Delta e}(k)) ; U_{c}(2)&= sum_{n=1}^{4}U_{e}(n)times U_{Delta e}(n+9)\ U_{c}(3)&= sum_{n=1}^{6}U_{e}(n)times U_{Delta e}(n+8); U_{c}(4)&= sum_{n=1}^{7}U_{e}(n)times U_{Delta e}(n+7)\
U_{c}(5)&= sum_{n=2}^{8}U_{e}(n)times U_{Delta e}(n+5); U_{c}(6)&= sum_{n=3}^{7}U_{e}(n)times U_{Delta e}(n+5)\
U_{c}(7)&= sum_{n=8}^{11}( U_{e}(n)timessum_{k=n-4}^{7}U_{Delta e}(k))
end{align}
end{document}
To have like:
numbering
add a comment |
In fact, I want to know how can I remove space in the second sum of the first expression and also to have a good equations design represented with only one number. Here is the code:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools}
begin{document}
begin{align}
U_{c}(1) &= sum_{n=1}^{4}( U_{e}(n)timessum_{k=n+10}^{14}U_{Delta e}(k)) ; U_{c}(2)&= sum_{n=1}^{4}U_{e}(n)times U_{Delta e}(n+9)\ U_{c}(3)&= sum_{n=1}^{6}U_{e}(n)times U_{Delta e}(n+8); U_{c}(4)&= sum_{n=1}^{7}U_{e}(n)times U_{Delta e}(n+7)\
U_{c}(5)&= sum_{n=2}^{8}U_{e}(n)times U_{Delta e}(n+5); U_{c}(6)&= sum_{n=3}^{7}U_{e}(n)times U_{Delta e}(n+5)\
U_{c}(7)&= sum_{n=8}^{11}( U_{e}(n)timessum_{k=n-4}^{7}U_{Delta e}(k))
end{align}
end{document}
To have like:
numbering
Don't accept my answer if it doesn't really solve your problem.
– Skillmon
9 hours ago
1
I wouldn't do this. It worsens legibility a lot, since one expects the equation numbers to be at the right margin and not somewhere inside the paragraph. I wouldn't find this equation if it was referenced.
– Skillmon
9 hours ago
This question is not clear. The added image doesn't make it any more clear.
– Werner
4 hours ago
add a comment |
In fact, I want to know how can I remove space in the second sum of the first expression and also to have a good equations design represented with only one number. Here is the code:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools}
begin{document}
begin{align}
U_{c}(1) &= sum_{n=1}^{4}( U_{e}(n)timessum_{k=n+10}^{14}U_{Delta e}(k)) ; U_{c}(2)&= sum_{n=1}^{4}U_{e}(n)times U_{Delta e}(n+9)\ U_{c}(3)&= sum_{n=1}^{6}U_{e}(n)times U_{Delta e}(n+8); U_{c}(4)&= sum_{n=1}^{7}U_{e}(n)times U_{Delta e}(n+7)\
U_{c}(5)&= sum_{n=2}^{8}U_{e}(n)times U_{Delta e}(n+5); U_{c}(6)&= sum_{n=3}^{7}U_{e}(n)times U_{Delta e}(n+5)\
U_{c}(7)&= sum_{n=8}^{11}( U_{e}(n)timessum_{k=n-4}^{7}U_{Delta e}(k))
end{align}
end{document}
To have like:
numbering
In fact, I want to know how can I remove space in the second sum of the first expression and also to have a good equations design represented with only one number. Here is the code:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools}
begin{document}
begin{align}
U_{c}(1) &= sum_{n=1}^{4}( U_{e}(n)timessum_{k=n+10}^{14}U_{Delta e}(k)) ; U_{c}(2)&= sum_{n=1}^{4}U_{e}(n)times U_{Delta e}(n+9)\ U_{c}(3)&= sum_{n=1}^{6}U_{e}(n)times U_{Delta e}(n+8); U_{c}(4)&= sum_{n=1}^{7}U_{e}(n)times U_{Delta e}(n+7)\
U_{c}(5)&= sum_{n=2}^{8}U_{e}(n)times U_{Delta e}(n+5); U_{c}(6)&= sum_{n=3}^{7}U_{e}(n)times U_{Delta e}(n+5)\
U_{c}(7)&= sum_{n=8}^{11}( U_{e}(n)timessum_{k=n-4}^{7}U_{Delta e}(k))
end{align}
end{document}
To have like:
numbering
numbering
edited 10 hours ago
kerdouj kardouj
asked 10 hours ago
kerdouj kardoujkerdouj kardouj
1095
1095
Don't accept my answer if it doesn't really solve your problem.
– Skillmon
9 hours ago
1
I wouldn't do this. It worsens legibility a lot, since one expects the equation numbers to be at the right margin and not somewhere inside the paragraph. I wouldn't find this equation if it was referenced.
– Skillmon
9 hours ago
This question is not clear. The added image doesn't make it any more clear.
– Werner
4 hours ago
add a comment |
Don't accept my answer if it doesn't really solve your problem.
– Skillmon
9 hours ago
1
I wouldn't do this. It worsens legibility a lot, since one expects the equation numbers to be at the right margin and not somewhere inside the paragraph. I wouldn't find this equation if it was referenced.
– Skillmon
9 hours ago
This question is not clear. The added image doesn't make it any more clear.
– Werner
4 hours ago
Don't accept my answer if it doesn't really solve your problem.
– Skillmon
9 hours ago
Don't accept my answer if it doesn't really solve your problem.
– Skillmon
9 hours ago
1
1
I wouldn't do this. It worsens legibility a lot, since one expects the equation numbers to be at the right margin and not somewhere inside the paragraph. I wouldn't find this equation if it was referenced.
– Skillmon
9 hours ago
I wouldn't do this. It worsens legibility a lot, since one expects the equation numbers to be at the right margin and not somewhere inside the paragraph. I wouldn't find this equation if it was referenced.
– Skillmon
9 hours ago
This question is not clear. The added image doesn't make it any more clear.
– Werner
4 hours ago
This question is not clear. The added image doesn't make it any more clear.
– Werner
4 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
The space is caused by the sum's subscript. If you remove the subscript's width, you get tight spacing. Also you miss an additional &
in places where you put a ;
, to start a new column with the alignment at the =
.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools}
begin{document}
begin{equation}
left[begin{aligned}
U_{c}(1) &= sum_{n=1}^{4}( U_{e}(n)timessum_{mathclap{k=n+10}}^{14}U_{Delta e}(k)) ;& U_{c}(2)&= sum_{n=1}^{4}U_{e}(n)times U_{Delta e}(n+9)\
U_{c}(3)&= sum_{n=1}^{6}U_{e}(n)times U_{Delta e}(n+8) ;& U_{c}(4)&= sum_{n=1}^{7}U_{e}(n)times U_{Delta e}(n+7)\
U_{c}(5)&= sum_{n=2}^{8}U_{e}(n)times U_{Delta e}(n+5) ;& U_{c}(6)&= sum_{n=3}^{7}U_{e}(n)times U_{Delta e}(n+5)\
U_{c}(7)&= sum_{n=8}^{11}( U_{e}(n)timessum_{k=n-4}^{7}U_{Delta e}(k))
end{aligned}right]
end{equation}
end{document}
But why is U_c(2) far from its expression and also I want these equations to be reprsented by one number instead of 4 with one bracket
– kerdouj kardouj
10 hours ago
@kerdoujkardouj that is because you miss an additional&
. See my edit. Not sure whether I got your second half right this time, though.
– Skillmon
10 hours ago
Ah okay thank you very much @Skillmon, if I want to represent the pair expressions inside a bracket how can I do it
– kerdouj kardouj
10 hours ago
@kerdoujkardouj adding a bit of kerning next to the brackets might enhance the look.
– Skillmon
10 hours ago
can you please look at the edit so you can see what I want to do
– kerdouj kardouj
9 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
Some suggestions:
Use side-by-side
minipage
environments, for the groups of 4 and 3 equations, respectivelyInside the
minipage
environments, useequation
andsplit
environments to achieve the required style of equation numberingReplace all
times
directives with thinspaceEnlarge the "outer" parentheses in the first and last equations on the right-hand side
Use
mathclap
to "snug up" the spacing around thesum
symbols in two casesOptional: replace all instances of
U_{Delta
withU_{!Delta
, to tighten up the spacing betweenU
and the subscript-Delta
symbol
Still another suggestion/observation, echoing the remark by @Skillmon: If the large curly braces are placed on the left, as indicated by the screenshot you posted, it's not going to be easy for your readers to notice the equation numbers on the right. Assuming you want to go with the proposed layout, it may be (a lot) better if the large curly braces are placed on the right, so that they direct the reader's eye to the associated equation number.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools} % for 'mathclap' macro
begin{document}
%% First solution: Curly braces placed on left-hand side
noindent
begin{minipage}[t]{0.5linewidth}
begin{equation}
left{begin{split}
U_{c}(1)&= sum_{n=1}^{4}Bigl( U_{e}(n)
sum_{mathclap{k=n+10}}^{14}U_{!Delta e}(k) Bigr) \
U_{c}(3)&= sum_{n=1}^{6}U_{e}(n), U_{!Delta e}(n+8) \
U_{c}(5)&= sum_{n=2}^{8}U_{e}(n), U_{!Delta e}(n+5) \
U_{c}(7)&= sum_{n=8}^{11}Bigl( U_{e}(n)
sum_{mathclap{k=n-4}}^{7}U_{!Delta e}(k) Bigr)
end{split}right.
end{equation}
end{minipage}%
hfill % maximize horizontal distance between the minipage environments
begin{minipage}[t]{0.47linewidth}
begin{equation}
left{begin{split}
U_{c}(2)&= sum_{n=1}^{4}U_{e}(n), U_{!Delta e}(n+9)\
U_{c}(4)&= sum_{n=1}^{7}U_{e}(n), U_{!Delta e}(n+7)\
U_{c}(6)&= sum_{n=3}^{7}U_{e}(n), U_{!Delta e}(n+5)
end{split}right.
end{equation}
end{minipage}
%% Second solution: Curly braces placed on right-hand side
noindent
begin{minipage}{0.5linewidth}
begin{equation}
left.begin{split}
U_{c}(1)&= sum_{n=1}^{4}Bigl( U_{e}(n)
sum_{mathclap{k=n+10}}^{14}U_{!Delta e}(k) Bigr) \
U_{c}(3)&= sum_{n=1}^{6}U_{e}(n), U_{!Delta e}(n+8) \
U_{c}(5)&= sum_{n=2}^{8}U_{e}(n), U_{!Delta e}(n+5) \
U_{c}(7)&= sum_{n=8}^{11}Bigl( U_{e}(n)
sum_{mathclap{k=n-4}}^{7}U_{!Delta e}(k) Bigr)
end{split}right}
end{equation}
end{minipage}%
hfill % maximize horizontal distance between the minipage environments
begin{minipage}{0.47linewidth}
begin{equation}
left.begin{split}
U_{c}(2)&= sum_{n=1}^{4}U_{e}(n), U_{!Delta e}(n+9)\
U_{c}(4)&= sum_{n=1}^{7}U_{e}(n), U_{!Delta e}(n+7)\
U_{c}(6)&= sum_{n=3}^{7}U_{e}(n), U_{!Delta e}(n+5)
end{split}right}
end{equation}
end{minipage}
end{document}
Very useful tips indeed. Still wouldn't do the second tag inside of the text block. This is bound to annoy readers.
– Skillmon
6 hours ago
@Skillmon - I fully agree with your comment. I've augmented my answer to post a second solution, with the curly braces placed on the right, pointing towards the associated equation numbers.
– Mico
5 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f471186%2fremoving-space-between-sum-and-its-correspondent-value-with-only-one-number-repr%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The space is caused by the sum's subscript. If you remove the subscript's width, you get tight spacing. Also you miss an additional &
in places where you put a ;
, to start a new column with the alignment at the =
.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools}
begin{document}
begin{equation}
left[begin{aligned}
U_{c}(1) &= sum_{n=1}^{4}( U_{e}(n)timessum_{mathclap{k=n+10}}^{14}U_{Delta e}(k)) ;& U_{c}(2)&= sum_{n=1}^{4}U_{e}(n)times U_{Delta e}(n+9)\
U_{c}(3)&= sum_{n=1}^{6}U_{e}(n)times U_{Delta e}(n+8) ;& U_{c}(4)&= sum_{n=1}^{7}U_{e}(n)times U_{Delta e}(n+7)\
U_{c}(5)&= sum_{n=2}^{8}U_{e}(n)times U_{Delta e}(n+5) ;& U_{c}(6)&= sum_{n=3}^{7}U_{e}(n)times U_{Delta e}(n+5)\
U_{c}(7)&= sum_{n=8}^{11}( U_{e}(n)timessum_{k=n-4}^{7}U_{Delta e}(k))
end{aligned}right]
end{equation}
end{document}
But why is U_c(2) far from its expression and also I want these equations to be reprsented by one number instead of 4 with one bracket
– kerdouj kardouj
10 hours ago
@kerdoujkardouj that is because you miss an additional&
. See my edit. Not sure whether I got your second half right this time, though.
– Skillmon
10 hours ago
Ah okay thank you very much @Skillmon, if I want to represent the pair expressions inside a bracket how can I do it
– kerdouj kardouj
10 hours ago
@kerdoujkardouj adding a bit of kerning next to the brackets might enhance the look.
– Skillmon
10 hours ago
can you please look at the edit so you can see what I want to do
– kerdouj kardouj
9 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
The space is caused by the sum's subscript. If you remove the subscript's width, you get tight spacing. Also you miss an additional &
in places where you put a ;
, to start a new column with the alignment at the =
.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools}
begin{document}
begin{equation}
left[begin{aligned}
U_{c}(1) &= sum_{n=1}^{4}( U_{e}(n)timessum_{mathclap{k=n+10}}^{14}U_{Delta e}(k)) ;& U_{c}(2)&= sum_{n=1}^{4}U_{e}(n)times U_{Delta e}(n+9)\
U_{c}(3)&= sum_{n=1}^{6}U_{e}(n)times U_{Delta e}(n+8) ;& U_{c}(4)&= sum_{n=1}^{7}U_{e}(n)times U_{Delta e}(n+7)\
U_{c}(5)&= sum_{n=2}^{8}U_{e}(n)times U_{Delta e}(n+5) ;& U_{c}(6)&= sum_{n=3}^{7}U_{e}(n)times U_{Delta e}(n+5)\
U_{c}(7)&= sum_{n=8}^{11}( U_{e}(n)timessum_{k=n-4}^{7}U_{Delta e}(k))
end{aligned}right]
end{equation}
end{document}
But why is U_c(2) far from its expression and also I want these equations to be reprsented by one number instead of 4 with one bracket
– kerdouj kardouj
10 hours ago
@kerdoujkardouj that is because you miss an additional&
. See my edit. Not sure whether I got your second half right this time, though.
– Skillmon
10 hours ago
Ah okay thank you very much @Skillmon, if I want to represent the pair expressions inside a bracket how can I do it
– kerdouj kardouj
10 hours ago
@kerdoujkardouj adding a bit of kerning next to the brackets might enhance the look.
– Skillmon
10 hours ago
can you please look at the edit so you can see what I want to do
– kerdouj kardouj
9 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
The space is caused by the sum's subscript. If you remove the subscript's width, you get tight spacing. Also you miss an additional &
in places where you put a ;
, to start a new column with the alignment at the =
.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools}
begin{document}
begin{equation}
left[begin{aligned}
U_{c}(1) &= sum_{n=1}^{4}( U_{e}(n)timessum_{mathclap{k=n+10}}^{14}U_{Delta e}(k)) ;& U_{c}(2)&= sum_{n=1}^{4}U_{e}(n)times U_{Delta e}(n+9)\
U_{c}(3)&= sum_{n=1}^{6}U_{e}(n)times U_{Delta e}(n+8) ;& U_{c}(4)&= sum_{n=1}^{7}U_{e}(n)times U_{Delta e}(n+7)\
U_{c}(5)&= sum_{n=2}^{8}U_{e}(n)times U_{Delta e}(n+5) ;& U_{c}(6)&= sum_{n=3}^{7}U_{e}(n)times U_{Delta e}(n+5)\
U_{c}(7)&= sum_{n=8}^{11}( U_{e}(n)timessum_{k=n-4}^{7}U_{Delta e}(k))
end{aligned}right]
end{equation}
end{document}
The space is caused by the sum's subscript. If you remove the subscript's width, you get tight spacing. Also you miss an additional &
in places where you put a ;
, to start a new column with the alignment at the =
.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools}
begin{document}
begin{equation}
left[begin{aligned}
U_{c}(1) &= sum_{n=1}^{4}( U_{e}(n)timessum_{mathclap{k=n+10}}^{14}U_{Delta e}(k)) ;& U_{c}(2)&= sum_{n=1}^{4}U_{e}(n)times U_{Delta e}(n+9)\
U_{c}(3)&= sum_{n=1}^{6}U_{e}(n)times U_{Delta e}(n+8) ;& U_{c}(4)&= sum_{n=1}^{7}U_{e}(n)times U_{Delta e}(n+7)\
U_{c}(5)&= sum_{n=2}^{8}U_{e}(n)times U_{Delta e}(n+5) ;& U_{c}(6)&= sum_{n=3}^{7}U_{e}(n)times U_{Delta e}(n+5)\
U_{c}(7)&= sum_{n=8}^{11}( U_{e}(n)timessum_{k=n-4}^{7}U_{Delta e}(k))
end{aligned}right]
end{equation}
end{document}
edited 10 hours ago
answered 10 hours ago
SkillmonSkillmon
21.5k11941
21.5k11941
But why is U_c(2) far from its expression and also I want these equations to be reprsented by one number instead of 4 with one bracket
– kerdouj kardouj
10 hours ago
@kerdoujkardouj that is because you miss an additional&
. See my edit. Not sure whether I got your second half right this time, though.
– Skillmon
10 hours ago
Ah okay thank you very much @Skillmon, if I want to represent the pair expressions inside a bracket how can I do it
– kerdouj kardouj
10 hours ago
@kerdoujkardouj adding a bit of kerning next to the brackets might enhance the look.
– Skillmon
10 hours ago
can you please look at the edit so you can see what I want to do
– kerdouj kardouj
9 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
But why is U_c(2) far from its expression and also I want these equations to be reprsented by one number instead of 4 with one bracket
– kerdouj kardouj
10 hours ago
@kerdoujkardouj that is because you miss an additional&
. See my edit. Not sure whether I got your second half right this time, though.
– Skillmon
10 hours ago
Ah okay thank you very much @Skillmon, if I want to represent the pair expressions inside a bracket how can I do it
– kerdouj kardouj
10 hours ago
@kerdoujkardouj adding a bit of kerning next to the brackets might enhance the look.
– Skillmon
10 hours ago
can you please look at the edit so you can see what I want to do
– kerdouj kardouj
9 hours ago
But why is U_c(2) far from its expression and also I want these equations to be reprsented by one number instead of 4 with one bracket
– kerdouj kardouj
10 hours ago
But why is U_c(2) far from its expression and also I want these equations to be reprsented by one number instead of 4 with one bracket
– kerdouj kardouj
10 hours ago
@kerdoujkardouj that is because you miss an additional
&
. See my edit. Not sure whether I got your second half right this time, though.– Skillmon
10 hours ago
@kerdoujkardouj that is because you miss an additional
&
. See my edit. Not sure whether I got your second half right this time, though.– Skillmon
10 hours ago
Ah okay thank you very much @Skillmon, if I want to represent the pair expressions inside a bracket how can I do it
– kerdouj kardouj
10 hours ago
Ah okay thank you very much @Skillmon, if I want to represent the pair expressions inside a bracket how can I do it
– kerdouj kardouj
10 hours ago
@kerdoujkardouj adding a bit of kerning next to the brackets might enhance the look.
– Skillmon
10 hours ago
@kerdoujkardouj adding a bit of kerning next to the brackets might enhance the look.
– Skillmon
10 hours ago
can you please look at the edit so you can see what I want to do
– kerdouj kardouj
9 hours ago
can you please look at the edit so you can see what I want to do
– kerdouj kardouj
9 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
Some suggestions:
Use side-by-side
minipage
environments, for the groups of 4 and 3 equations, respectivelyInside the
minipage
environments, useequation
andsplit
environments to achieve the required style of equation numberingReplace all
times
directives with thinspaceEnlarge the "outer" parentheses in the first and last equations on the right-hand side
Use
mathclap
to "snug up" the spacing around thesum
symbols in two casesOptional: replace all instances of
U_{Delta
withU_{!Delta
, to tighten up the spacing betweenU
and the subscript-Delta
symbol
Still another suggestion/observation, echoing the remark by @Skillmon: If the large curly braces are placed on the left, as indicated by the screenshot you posted, it's not going to be easy for your readers to notice the equation numbers on the right. Assuming you want to go with the proposed layout, it may be (a lot) better if the large curly braces are placed on the right, so that they direct the reader's eye to the associated equation number.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools} % for 'mathclap' macro
begin{document}
%% First solution: Curly braces placed on left-hand side
noindent
begin{minipage}[t]{0.5linewidth}
begin{equation}
left{begin{split}
U_{c}(1)&= sum_{n=1}^{4}Bigl( U_{e}(n)
sum_{mathclap{k=n+10}}^{14}U_{!Delta e}(k) Bigr) \
U_{c}(3)&= sum_{n=1}^{6}U_{e}(n), U_{!Delta e}(n+8) \
U_{c}(5)&= sum_{n=2}^{8}U_{e}(n), U_{!Delta e}(n+5) \
U_{c}(7)&= sum_{n=8}^{11}Bigl( U_{e}(n)
sum_{mathclap{k=n-4}}^{7}U_{!Delta e}(k) Bigr)
end{split}right.
end{equation}
end{minipage}%
hfill % maximize horizontal distance between the minipage environments
begin{minipage}[t]{0.47linewidth}
begin{equation}
left{begin{split}
U_{c}(2)&= sum_{n=1}^{4}U_{e}(n), U_{!Delta e}(n+9)\
U_{c}(4)&= sum_{n=1}^{7}U_{e}(n), U_{!Delta e}(n+7)\
U_{c}(6)&= sum_{n=3}^{7}U_{e}(n), U_{!Delta e}(n+5)
end{split}right.
end{equation}
end{minipage}
%% Second solution: Curly braces placed on right-hand side
noindent
begin{minipage}{0.5linewidth}
begin{equation}
left.begin{split}
U_{c}(1)&= sum_{n=1}^{4}Bigl( U_{e}(n)
sum_{mathclap{k=n+10}}^{14}U_{!Delta e}(k) Bigr) \
U_{c}(3)&= sum_{n=1}^{6}U_{e}(n), U_{!Delta e}(n+8) \
U_{c}(5)&= sum_{n=2}^{8}U_{e}(n), U_{!Delta e}(n+5) \
U_{c}(7)&= sum_{n=8}^{11}Bigl( U_{e}(n)
sum_{mathclap{k=n-4}}^{7}U_{!Delta e}(k) Bigr)
end{split}right}
end{equation}
end{minipage}%
hfill % maximize horizontal distance between the minipage environments
begin{minipage}{0.47linewidth}
begin{equation}
left.begin{split}
U_{c}(2)&= sum_{n=1}^{4}U_{e}(n), U_{!Delta e}(n+9)\
U_{c}(4)&= sum_{n=1}^{7}U_{e}(n), U_{!Delta e}(n+7)\
U_{c}(6)&= sum_{n=3}^{7}U_{e}(n), U_{!Delta e}(n+5)
end{split}right}
end{equation}
end{minipage}
end{document}
Very useful tips indeed. Still wouldn't do the second tag inside of the text block. This is bound to annoy readers.
– Skillmon
6 hours ago
@Skillmon - I fully agree with your comment. I've augmented my answer to post a second solution, with the curly braces placed on the right, pointing towards the associated equation numbers.
– Mico
5 hours ago
add a comment |
Some suggestions:
Use side-by-side
minipage
environments, for the groups of 4 and 3 equations, respectivelyInside the
minipage
environments, useequation
andsplit
environments to achieve the required style of equation numberingReplace all
times
directives with thinspaceEnlarge the "outer" parentheses in the first and last equations on the right-hand side
Use
mathclap
to "snug up" the spacing around thesum
symbols in two casesOptional: replace all instances of
U_{Delta
withU_{!Delta
, to tighten up the spacing betweenU
and the subscript-Delta
symbol
Still another suggestion/observation, echoing the remark by @Skillmon: If the large curly braces are placed on the left, as indicated by the screenshot you posted, it's not going to be easy for your readers to notice the equation numbers on the right. Assuming you want to go with the proposed layout, it may be (a lot) better if the large curly braces are placed on the right, so that they direct the reader's eye to the associated equation number.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools} % for 'mathclap' macro
begin{document}
%% First solution: Curly braces placed on left-hand side
noindent
begin{minipage}[t]{0.5linewidth}
begin{equation}
left{begin{split}
U_{c}(1)&= sum_{n=1}^{4}Bigl( U_{e}(n)
sum_{mathclap{k=n+10}}^{14}U_{!Delta e}(k) Bigr) \
U_{c}(3)&= sum_{n=1}^{6}U_{e}(n), U_{!Delta e}(n+8) \
U_{c}(5)&= sum_{n=2}^{8}U_{e}(n), U_{!Delta e}(n+5) \
U_{c}(7)&= sum_{n=8}^{11}Bigl( U_{e}(n)
sum_{mathclap{k=n-4}}^{7}U_{!Delta e}(k) Bigr)
end{split}right.
end{equation}
end{minipage}%
hfill % maximize horizontal distance between the minipage environments
begin{minipage}[t]{0.47linewidth}
begin{equation}
left{begin{split}
U_{c}(2)&= sum_{n=1}^{4}U_{e}(n), U_{!Delta e}(n+9)\
U_{c}(4)&= sum_{n=1}^{7}U_{e}(n), U_{!Delta e}(n+7)\
U_{c}(6)&= sum_{n=3}^{7}U_{e}(n), U_{!Delta e}(n+5)
end{split}right.
end{equation}
end{minipage}
%% Second solution: Curly braces placed on right-hand side
noindent
begin{minipage}{0.5linewidth}
begin{equation}
left.begin{split}
U_{c}(1)&= sum_{n=1}^{4}Bigl( U_{e}(n)
sum_{mathclap{k=n+10}}^{14}U_{!Delta e}(k) Bigr) \
U_{c}(3)&= sum_{n=1}^{6}U_{e}(n), U_{!Delta e}(n+8) \
U_{c}(5)&= sum_{n=2}^{8}U_{e}(n), U_{!Delta e}(n+5) \
U_{c}(7)&= sum_{n=8}^{11}Bigl( U_{e}(n)
sum_{mathclap{k=n-4}}^{7}U_{!Delta e}(k) Bigr)
end{split}right}
end{equation}
end{minipage}%
hfill % maximize horizontal distance between the minipage environments
begin{minipage}{0.47linewidth}
begin{equation}
left.begin{split}
U_{c}(2)&= sum_{n=1}^{4}U_{e}(n), U_{!Delta e}(n+9)\
U_{c}(4)&= sum_{n=1}^{7}U_{e}(n), U_{!Delta e}(n+7)\
U_{c}(6)&= sum_{n=3}^{7}U_{e}(n), U_{!Delta e}(n+5)
end{split}right}
end{equation}
end{minipage}
end{document}
Very useful tips indeed. Still wouldn't do the second tag inside of the text block. This is bound to annoy readers.
– Skillmon
6 hours ago
@Skillmon - I fully agree with your comment. I've augmented my answer to post a second solution, with the curly braces placed on the right, pointing towards the associated equation numbers.
– Mico
5 hours ago
add a comment |
Some suggestions:
Use side-by-side
minipage
environments, for the groups of 4 and 3 equations, respectivelyInside the
minipage
environments, useequation
andsplit
environments to achieve the required style of equation numberingReplace all
times
directives with thinspaceEnlarge the "outer" parentheses in the first and last equations on the right-hand side
Use
mathclap
to "snug up" the spacing around thesum
symbols in two casesOptional: replace all instances of
U_{Delta
withU_{!Delta
, to tighten up the spacing betweenU
and the subscript-Delta
symbol
Still another suggestion/observation, echoing the remark by @Skillmon: If the large curly braces are placed on the left, as indicated by the screenshot you posted, it's not going to be easy for your readers to notice the equation numbers on the right. Assuming you want to go with the proposed layout, it may be (a lot) better if the large curly braces are placed on the right, so that they direct the reader's eye to the associated equation number.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools} % for 'mathclap' macro
begin{document}
%% First solution: Curly braces placed on left-hand side
noindent
begin{minipage}[t]{0.5linewidth}
begin{equation}
left{begin{split}
U_{c}(1)&= sum_{n=1}^{4}Bigl( U_{e}(n)
sum_{mathclap{k=n+10}}^{14}U_{!Delta e}(k) Bigr) \
U_{c}(3)&= sum_{n=1}^{6}U_{e}(n), U_{!Delta e}(n+8) \
U_{c}(5)&= sum_{n=2}^{8}U_{e}(n), U_{!Delta e}(n+5) \
U_{c}(7)&= sum_{n=8}^{11}Bigl( U_{e}(n)
sum_{mathclap{k=n-4}}^{7}U_{!Delta e}(k) Bigr)
end{split}right.
end{equation}
end{minipage}%
hfill % maximize horizontal distance between the minipage environments
begin{minipage}[t]{0.47linewidth}
begin{equation}
left{begin{split}
U_{c}(2)&= sum_{n=1}^{4}U_{e}(n), U_{!Delta e}(n+9)\
U_{c}(4)&= sum_{n=1}^{7}U_{e}(n), U_{!Delta e}(n+7)\
U_{c}(6)&= sum_{n=3}^{7}U_{e}(n), U_{!Delta e}(n+5)
end{split}right.
end{equation}
end{minipage}
%% Second solution: Curly braces placed on right-hand side
noindent
begin{minipage}{0.5linewidth}
begin{equation}
left.begin{split}
U_{c}(1)&= sum_{n=1}^{4}Bigl( U_{e}(n)
sum_{mathclap{k=n+10}}^{14}U_{!Delta e}(k) Bigr) \
U_{c}(3)&= sum_{n=1}^{6}U_{e}(n), U_{!Delta e}(n+8) \
U_{c}(5)&= sum_{n=2}^{8}U_{e}(n), U_{!Delta e}(n+5) \
U_{c}(7)&= sum_{n=8}^{11}Bigl( U_{e}(n)
sum_{mathclap{k=n-4}}^{7}U_{!Delta e}(k) Bigr)
end{split}right}
end{equation}
end{minipage}%
hfill % maximize horizontal distance between the minipage environments
begin{minipage}{0.47linewidth}
begin{equation}
left.begin{split}
U_{c}(2)&= sum_{n=1}^{4}U_{e}(n), U_{!Delta e}(n+9)\
U_{c}(4)&= sum_{n=1}^{7}U_{e}(n), U_{!Delta e}(n+7)\
U_{c}(6)&= sum_{n=3}^{7}U_{e}(n), U_{!Delta e}(n+5)
end{split}right}
end{equation}
end{minipage}
end{document}
Some suggestions:
Use side-by-side
minipage
environments, for the groups of 4 and 3 equations, respectivelyInside the
minipage
environments, useequation
andsplit
environments to achieve the required style of equation numberingReplace all
times
directives with thinspaceEnlarge the "outer" parentheses in the first and last equations on the right-hand side
Use
mathclap
to "snug up" the spacing around thesum
symbols in two casesOptional: replace all instances of
U_{Delta
withU_{!Delta
, to tighten up the spacing betweenU
and the subscript-Delta
symbol
Still another suggestion/observation, echoing the remark by @Skillmon: If the large curly braces are placed on the left, as indicated by the screenshot you posted, it's not going to be easy for your readers to notice the equation numbers on the right. Assuming you want to go with the proposed layout, it may be (a lot) better if the large curly braces are placed on the right, so that they direct the reader's eye to the associated equation number.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools} % for 'mathclap' macro
begin{document}
%% First solution: Curly braces placed on left-hand side
noindent
begin{minipage}[t]{0.5linewidth}
begin{equation}
left{begin{split}
U_{c}(1)&= sum_{n=1}^{4}Bigl( U_{e}(n)
sum_{mathclap{k=n+10}}^{14}U_{!Delta e}(k) Bigr) \
U_{c}(3)&= sum_{n=1}^{6}U_{e}(n), U_{!Delta e}(n+8) \
U_{c}(5)&= sum_{n=2}^{8}U_{e}(n), U_{!Delta e}(n+5) \
U_{c}(7)&= sum_{n=8}^{11}Bigl( U_{e}(n)
sum_{mathclap{k=n-4}}^{7}U_{!Delta e}(k) Bigr)
end{split}right.
end{equation}
end{minipage}%
hfill % maximize horizontal distance between the minipage environments
begin{minipage}[t]{0.47linewidth}
begin{equation}
left{begin{split}
U_{c}(2)&= sum_{n=1}^{4}U_{e}(n), U_{!Delta e}(n+9)\
U_{c}(4)&= sum_{n=1}^{7}U_{e}(n), U_{!Delta e}(n+7)\
U_{c}(6)&= sum_{n=3}^{7}U_{e}(n), U_{!Delta e}(n+5)
end{split}right.
end{equation}
end{minipage}
%% Second solution: Curly braces placed on right-hand side
noindent
begin{minipage}{0.5linewidth}
begin{equation}
left.begin{split}
U_{c}(1)&= sum_{n=1}^{4}Bigl( U_{e}(n)
sum_{mathclap{k=n+10}}^{14}U_{!Delta e}(k) Bigr) \
U_{c}(3)&= sum_{n=1}^{6}U_{e}(n), U_{!Delta e}(n+8) \
U_{c}(5)&= sum_{n=2}^{8}U_{e}(n), U_{!Delta e}(n+5) \
U_{c}(7)&= sum_{n=8}^{11}Bigl( U_{e}(n)
sum_{mathclap{k=n-4}}^{7}U_{!Delta e}(k) Bigr)
end{split}right}
end{equation}
end{minipage}%
hfill % maximize horizontal distance between the minipage environments
begin{minipage}{0.47linewidth}
begin{equation}
left.begin{split}
U_{c}(2)&= sum_{n=1}^{4}U_{e}(n), U_{!Delta e}(n+9)\
U_{c}(4)&= sum_{n=1}^{7}U_{e}(n), U_{!Delta e}(n+7)\
U_{c}(6)&= sum_{n=3}^{7}U_{e}(n), U_{!Delta e}(n+5)
end{split}right}
end{equation}
end{minipage}
end{document}
edited 5 hours ago
answered 6 hours ago
MicoMico
275k30374763
275k30374763
Very useful tips indeed. Still wouldn't do the second tag inside of the text block. This is bound to annoy readers.
– Skillmon
6 hours ago
@Skillmon - I fully agree with your comment. I've augmented my answer to post a second solution, with the curly braces placed on the right, pointing towards the associated equation numbers.
– Mico
5 hours ago
add a comment |
Very useful tips indeed. Still wouldn't do the second tag inside of the text block. This is bound to annoy readers.
– Skillmon
6 hours ago
@Skillmon - I fully agree with your comment. I've augmented my answer to post a second solution, with the curly braces placed on the right, pointing towards the associated equation numbers.
– Mico
5 hours ago
Very useful tips indeed. Still wouldn't do the second tag inside of the text block. This is bound to annoy readers.
– Skillmon
6 hours ago
Very useful tips indeed. Still wouldn't do the second tag inside of the text block. This is bound to annoy readers.
– Skillmon
6 hours ago
@Skillmon - I fully agree with your comment. I've augmented my answer to post a second solution, with the curly braces placed on the right, pointing towards the associated equation numbers.
– Mico
5 hours ago
@Skillmon - I fully agree with your comment. I've augmented my answer to post a second solution, with the curly braces placed on the right, pointing towards the associated equation numbers.
– Mico
5 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f471186%2fremoving-space-between-sum-and-its-correspondent-value-with-only-one-number-repr%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Don't accept my answer if it doesn't really solve your problem.
– Skillmon
9 hours ago
1
I wouldn't do this. It worsens legibility a lot, since one expects the equation numbers to be at the right margin and not somewhere inside the paragraph. I wouldn't find this equation if it was referenced.
– Skillmon
9 hours ago
This question is not clear. The added image doesn't make it any more clear.
– Werner
4 hours ago