Is it correct to say “I was mistaking it with something”?
I was wondering if it is grammatically correct to say, "I was mistaking it with something"?
For example: some animal is coming from far away towards you and you think it is a cat. When it is near, you realize it is a dog; so you say to a friend "I was mistaking it with a cat!".
expressions grammaticality-in-context
edited Dec 19 '18 at 16:38
Michael Harvey
13.5k11330
asked Dec 19 '18 at 12:06
todaytoday
1384
add a comment |
I was wondering if it is grammatically correct to say, "I was mistaking it with something"?
For example: some animal is coming from far away towards you and you think it is a cat. When it is near, you realize it is a dog; so you say to a friend "I was mistaking it with a cat!".
expressions grammaticality-in-context
edited Dec 19 '18 at 16:38
Michael Harvey
13.5k11330
asked Dec 19 '18 at 12:06
todaytoday
1384
add a comment |
I was wondering if it is grammatically correct to say, "I was mistaking it with something"?
For example: some animal is coming from far away towards you and you think it is a cat. When it is near, you realize it is a dog; so you say to a friend "I was mistaking it with a cat!".
expressions grammaticality-in-context
edited Dec 19 '18 at 16:38
Michael Harvey
13.5k11330
asked Dec 19 '18 at 12:06
todaytoday
1384
I was wondering if it is grammatically correct to say, "I was mistaking it with something"?
For example: some animal is coming from far away towards you and you think it is a cat. When it is near, you realize it is a dog; so you say to a friend "I was mistaking it with a cat!".
expressions grammaticality-in-context
expressions grammaticality-in-context
edited Dec 19 '18 at 16:38
Michael Harvey
13.5k11330
asked Dec 19 '18 at 12:06
todaytoday
1384
edited Dec 19 '18 at 16:38
Michael Harvey
13.5k11330
asked Dec 19 '18 at 12:06
todaytoday
1384
edited Dec 19 '18 at 16:38
Michael Harvey
13.5k11330
edited Dec 19 '18 at 16:38
Michael Harvey
13.5k11330
edited Dec 19 '18 at 16:38
Michael Harvey
13.5k11330
13.5k11330
asked Dec 19 '18 at 12:06
todaytoday
1384
asked Dec 19 '18 at 12:06
todaytoday
1384
asked Dec 19 '18 at 12:06
todaytoday
1384
1384
add a comment |
add a comment |
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
The expression is to mistake somebody/something for, NOT to mistake somebody/something with. The use of with gets a zero return on Google Books Ngram viewer.
There is a similar expression to take somebody/something for that means much the same thing.
It's possible to use with after take in a different context, as in I took his advice with a pinch of salt, which means something quite different.
answered Dec 19 '18 at 12:15
Ronald SoleRonald Sole
10.7k11121
3
Or you'd get the usage of "with" if instead of mistaking it you were confusing it.
– Shufflepants
Dec 19 '18 at 16:00
Although, ironically, most uses of "confused with" should actually have been "conflated with" ;o)
– Will Crawford
Dec 20 '18 at 12:58
add a comment |
You can say that, and it might pass as grammatically correct (I agree with @Ronald's answer about using for rather than with); however, I think the simple past would sound more natural:
I mistook it for a cat!
Your sentence uses the past progressive (or past continuous) tense, which is used to talk about actions that continue for a period of time. You might use that tense in a sentence like this one:
I was thinking it was a cat, when all of a sudden it barked!
answered Dec 19 '18 at 12:17
J.R.♦J.R.
98.5k8126244
add a comment |
First, the approriate preposition is "for" as was pointed out R Sole.
Second, it would be much more frequent to hear from a native speaker "I mistook" rather than "I was mistaking." The latter would not sound idiomatic to a native speaker except in cases where the continuing nature of the mistake was being emphasized:
"I was mistaking it for a cat all the while, up until it barked, that is."
In most cases, the simple past should be used rather than the past progressive.
answered Dec 19 '18 at 15:00
Jeff MorrowJeff Morrow
10k1125
It depends a little on the context (what doesn't? :o)) but I find I most often find myself referring to a misunderstanding in the past tense with either I misunderstood… (in a sense synonymous with I mistook you ... i.e. I got the wrong end of the stick) or I was confusing ... (possibly had confused) because this usually comes after some time of conversation before it dawns on me that I erred! tl;dr I find the progressive usually more appropriate to what has just occurred ;o)
– Will Crawford
Dec 20 '18 at 12:56
1
I do not disagree that it depends on context. In fact, I pointed out that the past progressive could be appropriate. And it is a nice point about "confuse." Because "confusion" implies duration whereas "mistake" implies a singular event, the choice of tense may well be affected by the slight difference in meanings. I will not try to dispute what is a valid and interesting point, but, given the apparent knowledge of English by the OP, I doubt it helpful to take it into account in my answer.
– Jeff Morrow
Dec 20 '18 at 13:56
Touché. Yes, I think your explanation is correct - the choice of verb tends to suggest the tense.
– Will Crawford
Dec 20 '18 at 14:01
add a comment |
It's "mistake for" or "confuse with". I don't know if any grammatical rules control this. I'm a native speaker, and that's just the way it is.
"I was mistaking it for a cat"
"I was confusing it with a cat"
The difference in meaning is small. You might say either when you realize that your eyes are tricking you.
answered Dec 20 '18 at 12:41
nigel222nigel222
28514
add a comment |
Maybe it's better to use word confused:
I was confused cat with dog.
Right version (credits to @TannerSwett) :
I confused the dog for a cat
or
I was confused between a cat and a dog
And one more:
I totally was confused by cats and dogs.
Cats and dogs confused me.
There is a lot of confusion in cats and dogs.
Cats and dogs are so confusing.
answered Dec 19 '18 at 14:11
AlexanAlexan
994
3
No, you can't say "I was confused cat with dog", at least not where I live. But you can say "I confused the dog for a cat" or "I was confused between a cat and a dog".
– Tanner Swett
Dec 19 '18 at 14:35
Where I live, "I confused the dog FOR a cat" could only mean something like "I made the dog confused, for some reason which involved a cat" (and obviously, that sentence needs more context before it makes much sense!).
– alephzero
Dec 19 '18 at 16:12
Every single option you gave is inferior and has problems. The first is not even grammatically correct. In the second, "confused" is transitive so you are confusing the dog (what did you do, spin it around?). In the last one, it's extremely unclear what you were confused about. It could even mean that you were you confused while standing between a cat and a dog.
– T Nguyen
Dec 19 '18 at 18:07
@TNguyen, so what is right phrase with confusion word? I'm completely confused.
– Alexan
Dec 19 '18 at 18:33
@TannerSwett version is the best, most idiomatic use of "confuse" in this context.
– T Nguyen
Dec 19 '18 at 19:20
|
show 4 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "481"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f190072%2fis-it-correct-to-say-i-was-mistaking-it-with-something%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The expression is to mistake somebody/something for, NOT to mistake somebody/something with. The use of with gets a zero return on Google Books Ngram viewer.
There is a similar expression to take somebody/something for that means much the same thing.
It's possible to use with after take in a different context, as in I took his advice with a pinch of salt, which means something quite different.
answered Dec 19 '18 at 12:15
Ronald SoleRonald Sole
10.7k11121
3
Or you'd get the usage of "with" if instead of mistaking it you were confusing it.
– Shufflepants
Dec 19 '18 at 16:00
Although, ironically, most uses of "confused with" should actually have been "conflated with" ;o)
– Will Crawford
Dec 20 '18 at 12:58
add a comment |
The expression is to mistake somebody/something for, NOT to mistake somebody/something with. The use of with gets a zero return on Google Books Ngram viewer.
There is a similar expression to take somebody/something for that means much the same thing.
It's possible to use with after take in a different context, as in I took his advice with a pinch of salt, which means something quite different.
answered Dec 19 '18 at 12:15
Ronald SoleRonald Sole
10.7k11121
3
Or you'd get the usage of "with" if instead of mistaking it you were confusing it.
– Shufflepants
Dec 19 '18 at 16:00
Although, ironically, most uses of "confused with" should actually have been "conflated with" ;o)
– Will Crawford
Dec 20 '18 at 12:58
add a comment |
The expression is to mistake somebody/something for, NOT to mistake somebody/something with. The use of with gets a zero return on Google Books Ngram viewer.
There is a similar expression to take somebody/something for that means much the same thing.
It's possible to use with after take in a different context, as in I took his advice with a pinch of salt, which means something quite different.
answered Dec 19 '18 at 12:15
Ronald SoleRonald Sole
10.7k11121
The expression is to mistake somebody/something for, NOT to mistake somebody/something with. The use of with gets a zero return on Google Books Ngram viewer.
There is a similar expression to take somebody/something for that means much the same thing.
It's possible to use with after take in a different context, as in I took his advice with a pinch of salt, which means something quite different.
answered Dec 19 '18 at 12:15
Ronald SoleRonald Sole
10.7k11121
answered Dec 19 '18 at 12:15
Ronald SoleRonald Sole
10.7k11121
answered Dec 19 '18 at 12:15
Ronald SoleRonald Sole
10.7k11121
answered Dec 19 '18 at 12:15
Ronald SoleRonald Sole
10.7k11121
10.7k11121
3
Or you'd get the usage of "with" if instead of mistaking it you were confusing it.
– Shufflepants
Dec 19 '18 at 16:00
Although, ironically, most uses of "confused with" should actually have been "conflated with" ;o)
– Will Crawford
Dec 20 '18 at 12:58
add a comment |
3
Or you'd get the usage of "with" if instead of mistaking it you were confusing it.
– Shufflepants
Dec 19 '18 at 16:00
Although, ironically, most uses of "confused with" should actually have been "conflated with" ;o)
– Will Crawford
Dec 20 '18 at 12:58
3
3
Or you'd get the usage of "with" if instead of mistaking it you were confusing it.
– Shufflepants
Dec 19 '18 at 16:00
Or you'd get the usage of "with" if instead of mistaking it you were confusing it.
– Shufflepants
Dec 19 '18 at 16:00
Although, ironically, most uses of "confused with" should actually have been "conflated with" ;o)
– Will Crawford
Dec 20 '18 at 12:58
Although, ironically, most uses of "confused with" should actually have been "conflated with" ;o)
– Will Crawford
Dec 20 '18 at 12:58
add a comment |
You can say that, and it might pass as grammatically correct (I agree with @Ronald's answer about using for rather than with); however, I think the simple past would sound more natural:
I mistook it for a cat!
Your sentence uses the past progressive (or past continuous) tense, which is used to talk about actions that continue for a period of time. You might use that tense in a sentence like this one:
I was thinking it was a cat, when all of a sudden it barked!
answered Dec 19 '18 at 12:17
J.R.♦J.R.
98.5k8126244
add a comment |
You can say that, and it might pass as grammatically correct (I agree with @Ronald's answer about using for rather than with); however, I think the simple past would sound more natural:
I mistook it for a cat!
Your sentence uses the past progressive (or past continuous) tense, which is used to talk about actions that continue for a period of time. You might use that tense in a sentence like this one:
I was thinking it was a cat, when all of a sudden it barked!
answered Dec 19 '18 at 12:17
J.R.♦J.R.
98.5k8126244
add a comment |
You can say that, and it might pass as grammatically correct (I agree with @Ronald's answer about using for rather than with); however, I think the simple past would sound more natural:
I mistook it for a cat!
Your sentence uses the past progressive (or past continuous) tense, which is used to talk about actions that continue for a period of time. You might use that tense in a sentence like this one:
I was thinking it was a cat, when all of a sudden it barked!
answered Dec 19 '18 at 12:17
J.R.♦J.R.
98.5k8126244
You can say that, and it might pass as grammatically correct (I agree with @Ronald's answer about using for rather than with); however, I think the simple past would sound more natural:
I mistook it for a cat!
Your sentence uses the past progressive (or past continuous) tense, which is used to talk about actions that continue for a period of time. You might use that tense in a sentence like this one:
I was thinking it was a cat, when all of a sudden it barked!
answered Dec 19 '18 at 12:17
J.R.♦J.R.
98.5k8126244
answered Dec 19 '18 at 12:17
J.R.♦J.R.
98.5k8126244
answered Dec 19 '18 at 12:17
J.R.♦J.R.
98.5k8126244
answered Dec 19 '18 at 12:17
J.R.♦J.R.
98.5k8126244
98.5k8126244
add a comment |
add a comment |
First, the approriate preposition is "for" as was pointed out R Sole.
Second, it would be much more frequent to hear from a native speaker "I mistook" rather than "I was mistaking." The latter would not sound idiomatic to a native speaker except in cases where the continuing nature of the mistake was being emphasized:
"I was mistaking it for a cat all the while, up until it barked, that is."
In most cases, the simple past should be used rather than the past progressive.
answered Dec 19 '18 at 15:00
Jeff MorrowJeff Morrow
10k1125
It depends a little on the context (what doesn't? :o)) but I find I most often find myself referring to a misunderstanding in the past tense with either I misunderstood… (in a sense synonymous with I mistook you ... i.e. I got the wrong end of the stick) or I was confusing ... (possibly had confused) because this usually comes after some time of conversation before it dawns on me that I erred! tl;dr I find the progressive usually more appropriate to what has just occurred ;o)
– Will Crawford
Dec 20 '18 at 12:56
1
I do not disagree that it depends on context. In fact, I pointed out that the past progressive could be appropriate. And it is a nice point about "confuse." Because "confusion" implies duration whereas "mistake" implies a singular event, the choice of tense may well be affected by the slight difference in meanings. I will not try to dispute what is a valid and interesting point, but, given the apparent knowledge of English by the OP, I doubt it helpful to take it into account in my answer.
– Jeff Morrow
Dec 20 '18 at 13:56
Touché. Yes, I think your explanation is correct - the choice of verb tends to suggest the tense.
– Will Crawford
Dec 20 '18 at 14:01
add a comment |
First, the approriate preposition is "for" as was pointed out R Sole.
Second, it would be much more frequent to hear from a native speaker "I mistook" rather than "I was mistaking." The latter would not sound idiomatic to a native speaker except in cases where the continuing nature of the mistake was being emphasized:
"I was mistaking it for a cat all the while, up until it barked, that is."
In most cases, the simple past should be used rather than the past progressive.
answered Dec 19 '18 at 15:00
Jeff MorrowJeff Morrow
10k1125
It depends a little on the context (what doesn't? :o)) but I find I most often find myself referring to a misunderstanding in the past tense with either I misunderstood… (in a sense synonymous with I mistook you ... i.e. I got the wrong end of the stick) or I was confusing ... (possibly had confused) because this usually comes after some time of conversation before it dawns on me that I erred! tl;dr I find the progressive usually more appropriate to what has just occurred ;o)
– Will Crawford
Dec 20 '18 at 12:56
1
I do not disagree that it depends on context. In fact, I pointed out that the past progressive could be appropriate. And it is a nice point about "confuse." Because "confusion" implies duration whereas "mistake" implies a singular event, the choice of tense may well be affected by the slight difference in meanings. I will not try to dispute what is a valid and interesting point, but, given the apparent knowledge of English by the OP, I doubt it helpful to take it into account in my answer.
– Jeff Morrow
Dec 20 '18 at 13:56
Touché. Yes, I think your explanation is correct - the choice of verb tends to suggest the tense.
– Will Crawford
Dec 20 '18 at 14:01
add a comment |
First, the approriate preposition is "for" as was pointed out R Sole.
Second, it would be much more frequent to hear from a native speaker "I mistook" rather than "I was mistaking." The latter would not sound idiomatic to a native speaker except in cases where the continuing nature of the mistake was being emphasized:
"I was mistaking it for a cat all the while, up until it barked, that is."
In most cases, the simple past should be used rather than the past progressive.
answered Dec 19 '18 at 15:00
Jeff MorrowJeff Morrow
10k1125
First, the approriate preposition is "for" as was pointed out R Sole.
Second, it would be much more frequent to hear from a native speaker "I mistook" rather than "I was mistaking." The latter would not sound idiomatic to a native speaker except in cases where the continuing nature of the mistake was being emphasized:
"I was mistaking it for a cat all the while, up until it barked, that is."
In most cases, the simple past should be used rather than the past progressive.
answered Dec 19 '18 at 15:00
Jeff MorrowJeff Morrow
10k1125
answered Dec 19 '18 at 15:00
Jeff MorrowJeff Morrow
10k1125
answered Dec 19 '18 at 15:00
Jeff MorrowJeff Morrow
10k1125
answered Dec 19 '18 at 15:00
Jeff MorrowJeff Morrow
10k1125
10k1125
It depends a little on the context (what doesn't? :o)) but I find I most often find myself referring to a misunderstanding in the past tense with either I misunderstood… (in a sense synonymous with I mistook you ... i.e. I got the wrong end of the stick) or I was confusing ... (possibly had confused) because this usually comes after some time of conversation before it dawns on me that I erred! tl;dr I find the progressive usually more appropriate to what has just occurred ;o)
– Will Crawford
Dec 20 '18 at 12:56
1
I do not disagree that it depends on context. In fact, I pointed out that the past progressive could be appropriate. And it is a nice point about "confuse." Because "confusion" implies duration whereas "mistake" implies a singular event, the choice of tense may well be affected by the slight difference in meanings. I will not try to dispute what is a valid and interesting point, but, given the apparent knowledge of English by the OP, I doubt it helpful to take it into account in my answer.
– Jeff Morrow
Dec 20 '18 at 13:56
Touché. Yes, I think your explanation is correct - the choice of verb tends to suggest the tense.
– Will Crawford
Dec 20 '18 at 14:01
add a comment |
It depends a little on the context (what doesn't? :o)) but I find I most often find myself referring to a misunderstanding in the past tense with either I misunderstood… (in a sense synonymous with I mistook you ... i.e. I got the wrong end of the stick) or I was confusing ... (possibly had confused) because this usually comes after some time of conversation before it dawns on me that I erred! tl;dr I find the progressive usually more appropriate to what has just occurred ;o)
– Will Crawford
Dec 20 '18 at 12:56
1
I do not disagree that it depends on context. In fact, I pointed out that the past progressive could be appropriate. And it is a nice point about "confuse." Because "confusion" implies duration whereas "mistake" implies a singular event, the choice of tense may well be affected by the slight difference in meanings. I will not try to dispute what is a valid and interesting point, but, given the apparent knowledge of English by the OP, I doubt it helpful to take it into account in my answer.
– Jeff Morrow
Dec 20 '18 at 13:56
Touché. Yes, I think your explanation is correct - the choice of verb tends to suggest the tense.
– Will Crawford
Dec 20 '18 at 14:01
It depends a little on the context (what doesn't? :o)) but I find I most often find myself referring to a misunderstanding in the past tense with either I misunderstood… (in a sense synonymous with I mistook you ... i.e. I got the wrong end of the stick) or I was confusing ... (possibly had confused) because this usually comes after some time of conversation before it dawns on me that I erred! tl;dr I find the progressive usually more appropriate to what has just occurred ;o)
– Will Crawford
Dec 20 '18 at 12:56
It depends a little on the context (what doesn't? :o)) but I find I most often find myself referring to a misunderstanding in the past tense with either I misunderstood… (in a sense synonymous with I mistook you ... i.e. I got the wrong end of the stick) or I was confusing ... (possibly had confused) because this usually comes after some time of conversation before it dawns on me that I erred! tl;dr I find the progressive usually more appropriate to what has just occurred ;o)
– Will Crawford
Dec 20 '18 at 12:56
1
1
I do not disagree that it depends on context. In fact, I pointed out that the past progressive could be appropriate. And it is a nice point about "confuse." Because "confusion" implies duration whereas "mistake" implies a singular event, the choice of tense may well be affected by the slight difference in meanings. I will not try to dispute what is a valid and interesting point, but, given the apparent knowledge of English by the OP, I doubt it helpful to take it into account in my answer.
– Jeff Morrow
Dec 20 '18 at 13:56
I do not disagree that it depends on context. In fact, I pointed out that the past progressive could be appropriate. And it is a nice point about "confuse." Because "confusion" implies duration whereas "mistake" implies a singular event, the choice of tense may well be affected by the slight difference in meanings. I will not try to dispute what is a valid and interesting point, but, given the apparent knowledge of English by the OP, I doubt it helpful to take it into account in my answer.
– Jeff Morrow
Dec 20 '18 at 13:56
Touché. Yes, I think your explanation is correct - the choice of verb tends to suggest the tense.
– Will Crawford
Dec 20 '18 at 14:01
Touché. Yes, I think your explanation is correct - the choice of verb tends to suggest the tense.
– Will Crawford
Dec 20 '18 at 14:01
add a comment |
It's "mistake for" or "confuse with". I don't know if any grammatical rules control this. I'm a native speaker, and that's just the way it is.
"I was mistaking it for a cat"
"I was confusing it with a cat"
The difference in meaning is small. You might say either when you realize that your eyes are tricking you.
answered Dec 20 '18 at 12:41
nigel222nigel222
28514
add a comment |
It's "mistake for" or "confuse with". I don't know if any grammatical rules control this. I'm a native speaker, and that's just the way it is.
"I was mistaking it for a cat"
"I was confusing it with a cat"
The difference in meaning is small. You might say either when you realize that your eyes are tricking you.
answered Dec 20 '18 at 12:41
nigel222nigel222
28514
add a comment |
It's "mistake for" or "confuse with". I don't know if any grammatical rules control this. I'm a native speaker, and that's just the way it is.
"I was mistaking it for a cat"
"I was confusing it with a cat"
The difference in meaning is small. You might say either when you realize that your eyes are tricking you.
answered Dec 20 '18 at 12:41
nigel222nigel222
28514
It's "mistake for" or "confuse with". I don't know if any grammatical rules control this. I'm a native speaker, and that's just the way it is.
"I was mistaking it for a cat"
"I was confusing it with a cat"
The difference in meaning is small. You might say either when you realize that your eyes are tricking you.
answered Dec 20 '18 at 12:41
nigel222nigel222
28514
answered Dec 20 '18 at 12:41
nigel222nigel222
28514
answered Dec 20 '18 at 12:41
nigel222nigel222
28514
answered Dec 20 '18 at 12:41
nigel222nigel222
28514
28514
add a comment |
add a comment |
Maybe it's better to use word confused:
I was confused cat with dog.
Right version (credits to @TannerSwett) :
I confused the dog for a cat
or
I was confused between a cat and a dog
And one more:
I totally was confused by cats and dogs.
Cats and dogs confused me.
There is a lot of confusion in cats and dogs.
Cats and dogs are so confusing.
answered Dec 19 '18 at 14:11
AlexanAlexan
994
3
No, you can't say "I was confused cat with dog", at least not where I live. But you can say "I confused the dog for a cat" or "I was confused between a cat and a dog".
– Tanner Swett
Dec 19 '18 at 14:35
Where I live, "I confused the dog FOR a cat" could only mean something like "I made the dog confused, for some reason which involved a cat" (and obviously, that sentence needs more context before it makes much sense!).
– alephzero
Dec 19 '18 at 16:12
Every single option you gave is inferior and has problems. The first is not even grammatically correct. In the second, "confused" is transitive so you are confusing the dog (what did you do, spin it around?). In the last one, it's extremely unclear what you were confused about. It could even mean that you were you confused while standing between a cat and a dog.
– T Nguyen
Dec 19 '18 at 18:07
@TNguyen, so what is right phrase with confusion word? I'm completely confused.
– Alexan
Dec 19 '18 at 18:33
@TannerSwett version is the best, most idiomatic use of "confuse" in this context.
– T Nguyen
Dec 19 '18 at 19:20
|
show 4 more comments
Maybe it's better to use word confused:
I was confused cat with dog.
Right version (credits to @TannerSwett) :
I confused the dog for a cat
or
I was confused between a cat and a dog
And one more:
I totally was confused by cats and dogs.
Cats and dogs confused me.
There is a lot of confusion in cats and dogs.
Cats and dogs are so confusing.
answered Dec 19 '18 at 14:11
AlexanAlexan
994
3
No, you can't say "I was confused cat with dog", at least not where I live. But you can say "I confused the dog for a cat" or "I was confused between a cat and a dog".
– Tanner Swett
Dec 19 '18 at 14:35
Where I live, "I confused the dog FOR a cat" could only mean something like "I made the dog confused, for some reason which involved a cat" (and obviously, that sentence needs more context before it makes much sense!).
– alephzero
Dec 19 '18 at 16:12
Every single option you gave is inferior and has problems. The first is not even grammatically correct. In the second, "confused" is transitive so you are confusing the dog (what did you do, spin it around?). In the last one, it's extremely unclear what you were confused about. It could even mean that you were you confused while standing between a cat and a dog.
– T Nguyen
Dec 19 '18 at 18:07
@TNguyen, so what is right phrase with confusion word? I'm completely confused.
– Alexan
Dec 19 '18 at 18:33
@TannerSwett version is the best, most idiomatic use of "confuse" in this context.
– T Nguyen
Dec 19 '18 at 19:20
|
show 4 more comments
Maybe it's better to use word confused:
I was confused cat with dog.
Right version (credits to @TannerSwett) :
I confused the dog for a cat
or
I was confused between a cat and a dog
And one more:
I totally was confused by cats and dogs.
Cats and dogs confused me.
There is a lot of confusion in cats and dogs.
Cats and dogs are so confusing.
answered Dec 19 '18 at 14:11
AlexanAlexan
994
Maybe it's better to use word confused:
I was confused cat with dog.
Right version (credits to @TannerSwett) :
I confused the dog for a cat
or
I was confused between a cat and a dog
And one more:
I totally was confused by cats and dogs.
Cats and dogs confused me.
There is a lot of confusion in cats and dogs.
Cats and dogs are so confusing.
answered Dec 19 '18 at 14:11
AlexanAlexan
994
edited Dec 19 '18 at 21:16
answered Dec 19 '18 at 14:11
AlexanAlexan
994
answered Dec 19 '18 at 14:11
AlexanAlexan
994
answered Dec 19 '18 at 14:11
AlexanAlexan
994
994
3
No, you can't say "I was confused cat with dog", at least not where I live. But you can say "I confused the dog for a cat" or "I was confused between a cat and a dog".
– Tanner Swett
Dec 19 '18 at 14:35
Where I live, "I confused the dog FOR a cat" could only mean something like "I made the dog confused, for some reason which involved a cat" (and obviously, that sentence needs more context before it makes much sense!).
– alephzero
Dec 19 '18 at 16:12
Every single option you gave is inferior and has problems. The first is not even grammatically correct. In the second, "confused" is transitive so you are confusing the dog (what did you do, spin it around?). In the last one, it's extremely unclear what you were confused about. It could even mean that you were you confused while standing between a cat and a dog.
– T Nguyen
Dec 19 '18 at 18:07
@TNguyen, so what is right phrase with confusion word? I'm completely confused.
– Alexan
Dec 19 '18 at 18:33
@TannerSwett version is the best, most idiomatic use of "confuse" in this context.
– T Nguyen
Dec 19 '18 at 19:20
|
show 4 more comments
3
No, you can't say "I was confused cat with dog", at least not where I live. But you can say "I confused the dog for a cat" or "I was confused between a cat and a dog".
– Tanner Swett
Dec 19 '18 at 14:35
Where I live, "I confused the dog FOR a cat" could only mean something like "I made the dog confused, for some reason which involved a cat" (and obviously, that sentence needs more context before it makes much sense!).
– alephzero
Dec 19 '18 at 16:12
Every single option you gave is inferior and has problems. The first is not even grammatically correct. In the second, "confused" is transitive so you are confusing the dog (what did you do, spin it around?). In the last one, it's extremely unclear what you were confused about. It could even mean that you were you confused while standing between a cat and a dog.
– T Nguyen
Dec 19 '18 at 18:07
@TNguyen, so what is right phrase with confusion word? I'm completely confused.
– Alexan
Dec 19 '18 at 18:33
@TannerSwett version is the best, most idiomatic use of "confuse" in this context.
– T Nguyen
Dec 19 '18 at 19:20
3
3
No, you can't say "I was confused cat with dog", at least not where I live. But you can say "I confused the dog for a cat" or "I was confused between a cat and a dog".
– Tanner Swett
Dec 19 '18 at 14:35
No, you can't say "I was confused cat with dog", at least not where I live. But you can say "I confused the dog for a cat" or "I was confused between a cat and a dog".
– Tanner Swett
Dec 19 '18 at 14:35
Where I live, "I confused the dog FOR a cat" could only mean something like "I made the dog confused, for some reason which involved a cat" (and obviously, that sentence needs more context before it makes much sense!).
– alephzero
Dec 19 '18 at 16:12
Where I live, "I confused the dog FOR a cat" could only mean something like "I made the dog confused, for some reason which involved a cat" (and obviously, that sentence needs more context before it makes much sense!).
– alephzero
Dec 19 '18 at 16:12
Every single option you gave is inferior and has problems. The first is not even grammatically correct. In the second, "confused" is transitive so you are confusing the dog (what did you do, spin it around?). In the last one, it's extremely unclear what you were confused about. It could even mean that you were you confused while standing between a cat and a dog.
– T Nguyen
Dec 19 '18 at 18:07
Every single option you gave is inferior and has problems. The first is not even grammatically correct. In the second, "confused" is transitive so you are confusing the dog (what did you do, spin it around?). In the last one, it's extremely unclear what you were confused about. It could even mean that you were you confused while standing between a cat and a dog.
– T Nguyen
Dec 19 '18 at 18:07
@TNguyen, so what is right phrase with confusion word? I'm completely confused.
– Alexan
Dec 19 '18 at 18:33
@TNguyen, so what is right phrase with confusion word? I'm completely confused.
– Alexan
Dec 19 '18 at 18:33
@TannerSwett version is the best, most idiomatic use of "confuse" in this context.
– T Nguyen
Dec 19 '18 at 19:20
@TannerSwett version is the best, most idiomatic use of "confuse" in this context.
– T Nguyen
Dec 19 '18 at 19:20
|
show 4 more comments
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f190072%2fis-it-correct-to-say-i-was-mistaking-it-with-something%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
