How do all of these “Save video from YouTube” services work?












59















I mean, how do they work, generally? How do they receive the link to a video stream itself (not just the page containing a Flash player)?



I did a search on the web but couldn't find anything useful (all links point to such services, but none of them tell how they are actually implemented).










share|improve this question





























    59















    I mean, how do they work, generally? How do they receive the link to a video stream itself (not just the page containing a Flash player)?



    I did a search on the web but couldn't find anything useful (all links point to such services, but none of them tell how they are actually implemented).










    share|improve this question



























      59












      59








      59


      37






      I mean, how do they work, generally? How do they receive the link to a video stream itself (not just the page containing a Flash player)?



      I did a search on the web but couldn't find anything useful (all links point to such services, but none of them tell how they are actually implemented).










      share|improve this question
















      I mean, how do they work, generally? How do they receive the link to a video stream itself (not just the page containing a Flash player)?



      I did a search on the web but couldn't find anything useful (all links point to such services, but none of them tell how they are actually implemented).







      youtube






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Jul 2 '14 at 10:00









      Der Hochstapler

      67.7k49230284




      67.7k49230284










      asked Jun 26 '14 at 12:44









      PaulDPaulD

      416156




      416156






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          49














          There is a very popular open source command-line downloader called youtube-dl, which does exactly that. It grabs the actual video and audio file links from a given YouTube link – or any other popular web video site like Vimeo, Yahoo! Video, uStream, etc.



          To see how that's done, look into the YouTube extractor. That's just too much to show here. Other extractors exist for simpler sites. Steven Penny has a simple JavaScript downloader for YouTube too, which is a little more straightforward.



          But basically, for a Flash video player, it must be initialized and configured through some JavaScript. Simply speaking, the Flash object's player will receive a URL of a video stream to load.



          In order to find the video stream, you'd have to parse the HTML and JS code of the video page to find the relevant initialization code, and then from there try to find the link to the actual MP4 file. It might be there in plaintext, but it could also be generated on the fly with some specific download tokens. Often, the JavaScript is obfuscated to make it harder to re-engineer it. Or the video information might be contained in an XML file that's loaded asynchronously by JS.



          For HTML5 progressive download video, the actual source file is usually mentioned directly in the source child of the video tag, so if you'd search the page for mp4 or similar. For example on German news show Tagesschau 100, you'll find:



          <source src="http://media.tagesschau.de/video/2014/0626/TV-20140626-1649-5801.webl.h264.mp4" type="video/mp4">


          For more advanced playback technologies like MPEG DASH or Apple's HTTP Live Streaming (HLS), you have to parse a meta-information file to get the actual video stream. The meta file (.mpd for example in DASH, and .m3u8 for HLS) will contain links to segments of video and audio, which you'd later have to combine to get a playable file.



          There's no general solution for this. It requires careful inspection and debugging of the target site.






          share|improve this answer





















          • 3





            One question, what is Youtube/Google's policy on this? Are they ok with this, or not so much?

            – JMK
            Jun 26 '14 at 15:53






          • 31





            The YouTube Terms of Service in §5.1.L disallow consumption of their content through any other means than streaming, so theoretically it's not allowed. In practice, they won't be able to enforce that though. Any downloader can more or less simulate that it's just streaming.

            – slhck
            Jun 26 '14 at 16:23








          • 2





            @StevenPenny do you have any non minified version of that?

            – TankorSmash
            Jun 26 '14 at 18:08






          • 5





            @slhck Flash could also make HTTP requests by itself. Instead, it uses the browser’s HTTP engine. If Flash itself made the requests, they wouldn’t be “visible” to the browser. Sure would be great for advertisers. ;)

            – Daniel B
            Jun 26 '14 at 19:49






          • 3





            @slhck they can't enforce it programmatically, but if they got their lawyer team out could they enforce it legally?

            – Cruncher
            Jun 27 '14 at 15:45



















          32














          YouTube Bookmarklet



          This is how I did it with JavaScript



          Start with ytplayer.config.args object. This contains all URLs for the video.
          It is broken up into



          url_encoded_fmt_stream_map // traditional: contains video and audio stream
          adaptive_fmts // DASH: contains video or audio stream


          Each of these is a comma separated array of what I would call "stream objects".
          Each "stream object" will contain values like this



          url  // direct HTTP link to a video
          itag // code specifying the quality
          s // signature, security measure to counter downloading


          Each URL
          will be encoded so you will need
          to decode them. Now the tricky part.



          YouTube has at least 3 security levels for their videos



          unsecured // as expected, you can download these with just the unencoded URL
          s // see below
          RTMPE // uses "rtmpe://" protocol, no known method for these


          The RTMPE videos are typically used on official full length movies, and are
          protected with SWF Verification Type 2. This has been around
          since 2011
          and has yet to be reverse engineered.



          The type "s" videos are the most difficult that can actually be downloaded. You
          will typcially see these on VEVO videos and the like. They start with a
          signature such as



          AA5D05FA7771AD4868BA4C977C3DEAAC620DE020E.0F421820F42978A1F8EAFCDAC4EF507DB5


          Then the signature is scrambled with a function like this



          function mo(a) {
          a = a.split("");
          a = lo.rw(a, 1);
          a = lo.rw(a, 32);
          a = lo.IC(a, 1);
          a = lo.wS(a, 77);
          a = lo.IC(a, 3);
          a = lo.wS(a, 77);
          a = lo.IC(a, 3);
          a = lo.wS(a, 44);
          return a.join("")
          }


          This function is dynamic, it typically changes every day. To make it more
          difficult the function is hosted at a URL such as



          http://s.ytimg.com/yts/jsbin/html5player-en_US-vflycBCEX.js


          this introduces the problem of
          Same-origin policy. Essentially,
          you cannot download this file from www.youtube.com because they are
          different domains. A workaround of this problem is
          CORS. With CORS,
          s.ytimg.com could add this header



          Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://www.youtube.com


          and it would allow the JavaScript to download from www.youtube.com. Of course
          they do not do this. A workaround for this workaround is to use a CORS proxy.
          This is a proxy that responds with the following header to all requests



          Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *


          So, now that you have proxied your JS file, and used the function to scramble
          the signature, you can use that in the querystring to download a video.






          share|improve this answer





















          • 1





            Do you happen to know (for DASH playback) how the YouTube player determines the byte ranges to be requested from the media representation? The MPD file only lists segments.

            – slhck
            Jul 9 '14 at 12:51






          • 2





            Not exactly.. There is a single file for video and audio, but YouTube requests them by byte ranges, in several chunks. If you switch to another quality, it'll change the byte range too. Just wondering how the player knows which second corresponds to which byte offset.

            – slhck
            Jul 9 '14 at 16:25






          • 1





            Can you give an example of an s type video and RTMPE type video?

            – Chloe
            May 3 '16 at 5:10











          • @SurajJain here is new page - I will be rewriting this answer as I use a different method now github.com/svnpenn/umber/blob/master/bmklet/youtube/download.js

            – Steven Penny
            Feb 19 '18 at 12:39



















          0














          My answer:
          from 22 January 2019, using these methods can get caught if you try to bypass without linking your user information as well.



          Why?
          since I'm a new user to this platform, I cannot comment for rule specified by @Daniel-B. According to new ToS (in German as I am in Germany; please translate) for YouTube under $6.1 G$:




          You agree any automated system (including – but not limited to – any robot, spider or offline reader) to use that on the website accesses in such a way that more requests to the server within a specified time YouTube directed being able to reasonably produce as a human within the same time period using a publicly available, unmodified standard web browser;




          Now they can find out the time duration for each request and can track if you are violating. How is it possible now, given this scenario and your external IP address will be known even if you use a VPN to protect yourself without linking details of user to any service.






          share|improve this answer





















          • 1





            Welcome traveler from the future...It isn’t clear how this answers the author’s question

            – Ramhound
            Dec 27 '18 at 22:31











          • If you wanted to warn the author, with regards to a specific answer, you should have submitted a comment and downvoted any answer you didn't think was helpful due to the possible legal issues that could follow. This answer reads more like what you would find on a discussion forum post, and Super User, isn't a discussion forum

            – Ramhound
            Jan 13 at 0:34












          protected by Ramhound Dec 27 '18 at 22:31



          Thank you for your interest in this question.
          Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



          Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?














          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes








          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          49














          There is a very popular open source command-line downloader called youtube-dl, which does exactly that. It grabs the actual video and audio file links from a given YouTube link – or any other popular web video site like Vimeo, Yahoo! Video, uStream, etc.



          To see how that's done, look into the YouTube extractor. That's just too much to show here. Other extractors exist for simpler sites. Steven Penny has a simple JavaScript downloader for YouTube too, which is a little more straightforward.



          But basically, for a Flash video player, it must be initialized and configured through some JavaScript. Simply speaking, the Flash object's player will receive a URL of a video stream to load.



          In order to find the video stream, you'd have to parse the HTML and JS code of the video page to find the relevant initialization code, and then from there try to find the link to the actual MP4 file. It might be there in plaintext, but it could also be generated on the fly with some specific download tokens. Often, the JavaScript is obfuscated to make it harder to re-engineer it. Or the video information might be contained in an XML file that's loaded asynchronously by JS.



          For HTML5 progressive download video, the actual source file is usually mentioned directly in the source child of the video tag, so if you'd search the page for mp4 or similar. For example on German news show Tagesschau 100, you'll find:



          <source src="http://media.tagesschau.de/video/2014/0626/TV-20140626-1649-5801.webl.h264.mp4" type="video/mp4">


          For more advanced playback technologies like MPEG DASH or Apple's HTTP Live Streaming (HLS), you have to parse a meta-information file to get the actual video stream. The meta file (.mpd for example in DASH, and .m3u8 for HLS) will contain links to segments of video and audio, which you'd later have to combine to get a playable file.



          There's no general solution for this. It requires careful inspection and debugging of the target site.






          share|improve this answer





















          • 3





            One question, what is Youtube/Google's policy on this? Are they ok with this, or not so much?

            – JMK
            Jun 26 '14 at 15:53






          • 31





            The YouTube Terms of Service in §5.1.L disallow consumption of their content through any other means than streaming, so theoretically it's not allowed. In practice, they won't be able to enforce that though. Any downloader can more or less simulate that it's just streaming.

            – slhck
            Jun 26 '14 at 16:23








          • 2





            @StevenPenny do you have any non minified version of that?

            – TankorSmash
            Jun 26 '14 at 18:08






          • 5





            @slhck Flash could also make HTTP requests by itself. Instead, it uses the browser’s HTTP engine. If Flash itself made the requests, they wouldn’t be “visible” to the browser. Sure would be great for advertisers. ;)

            – Daniel B
            Jun 26 '14 at 19:49






          • 3





            @slhck they can't enforce it programmatically, but if they got their lawyer team out could they enforce it legally?

            – Cruncher
            Jun 27 '14 at 15:45
















          49














          There is a very popular open source command-line downloader called youtube-dl, which does exactly that. It grabs the actual video and audio file links from a given YouTube link – or any other popular web video site like Vimeo, Yahoo! Video, uStream, etc.



          To see how that's done, look into the YouTube extractor. That's just too much to show here. Other extractors exist for simpler sites. Steven Penny has a simple JavaScript downloader for YouTube too, which is a little more straightforward.



          But basically, for a Flash video player, it must be initialized and configured through some JavaScript. Simply speaking, the Flash object's player will receive a URL of a video stream to load.



          In order to find the video stream, you'd have to parse the HTML and JS code of the video page to find the relevant initialization code, and then from there try to find the link to the actual MP4 file. It might be there in plaintext, but it could also be generated on the fly with some specific download tokens. Often, the JavaScript is obfuscated to make it harder to re-engineer it. Or the video information might be contained in an XML file that's loaded asynchronously by JS.



          For HTML5 progressive download video, the actual source file is usually mentioned directly in the source child of the video tag, so if you'd search the page for mp4 or similar. For example on German news show Tagesschau 100, you'll find:



          <source src="http://media.tagesschau.de/video/2014/0626/TV-20140626-1649-5801.webl.h264.mp4" type="video/mp4">


          For more advanced playback technologies like MPEG DASH or Apple's HTTP Live Streaming (HLS), you have to parse a meta-information file to get the actual video stream. The meta file (.mpd for example in DASH, and .m3u8 for HLS) will contain links to segments of video and audio, which you'd later have to combine to get a playable file.



          There's no general solution for this. It requires careful inspection and debugging of the target site.






          share|improve this answer





















          • 3





            One question, what is Youtube/Google's policy on this? Are they ok with this, or not so much?

            – JMK
            Jun 26 '14 at 15:53






          • 31





            The YouTube Terms of Service in §5.1.L disallow consumption of their content through any other means than streaming, so theoretically it's not allowed. In practice, they won't be able to enforce that though. Any downloader can more or less simulate that it's just streaming.

            – slhck
            Jun 26 '14 at 16:23








          • 2





            @StevenPenny do you have any non minified version of that?

            – TankorSmash
            Jun 26 '14 at 18:08






          • 5





            @slhck Flash could also make HTTP requests by itself. Instead, it uses the browser’s HTTP engine. If Flash itself made the requests, they wouldn’t be “visible” to the browser. Sure would be great for advertisers. ;)

            – Daniel B
            Jun 26 '14 at 19:49






          • 3





            @slhck they can't enforce it programmatically, but if they got their lawyer team out could they enforce it legally?

            – Cruncher
            Jun 27 '14 at 15:45














          49












          49








          49







          There is a very popular open source command-line downloader called youtube-dl, which does exactly that. It grabs the actual video and audio file links from a given YouTube link – or any other popular web video site like Vimeo, Yahoo! Video, uStream, etc.



          To see how that's done, look into the YouTube extractor. That's just too much to show here. Other extractors exist for simpler sites. Steven Penny has a simple JavaScript downloader for YouTube too, which is a little more straightforward.



          But basically, for a Flash video player, it must be initialized and configured through some JavaScript. Simply speaking, the Flash object's player will receive a URL of a video stream to load.



          In order to find the video stream, you'd have to parse the HTML and JS code of the video page to find the relevant initialization code, and then from there try to find the link to the actual MP4 file. It might be there in plaintext, but it could also be generated on the fly with some specific download tokens. Often, the JavaScript is obfuscated to make it harder to re-engineer it. Or the video information might be contained in an XML file that's loaded asynchronously by JS.



          For HTML5 progressive download video, the actual source file is usually mentioned directly in the source child of the video tag, so if you'd search the page for mp4 or similar. For example on German news show Tagesschau 100, you'll find:



          <source src="http://media.tagesschau.de/video/2014/0626/TV-20140626-1649-5801.webl.h264.mp4" type="video/mp4">


          For more advanced playback technologies like MPEG DASH or Apple's HTTP Live Streaming (HLS), you have to parse a meta-information file to get the actual video stream. The meta file (.mpd for example in DASH, and .m3u8 for HLS) will contain links to segments of video and audio, which you'd later have to combine to get a playable file.



          There's no general solution for this. It requires careful inspection and debugging of the target site.






          share|improve this answer















          There is a very popular open source command-line downloader called youtube-dl, which does exactly that. It grabs the actual video and audio file links from a given YouTube link – or any other popular web video site like Vimeo, Yahoo! Video, uStream, etc.



          To see how that's done, look into the YouTube extractor. That's just too much to show here. Other extractors exist for simpler sites. Steven Penny has a simple JavaScript downloader for YouTube too, which is a little more straightforward.



          But basically, for a Flash video player, it must be initialized and configured through some JavaScript. Simply speaking, the Flash object's player will receive a URL of a video stream to load.



          In order to find the video stream, you'd have to parse the HTML and JS code of the video page to find the relevant initialization code, and then from there try to find the link to the actual MP4 file. It might be there in plaintext, but it could also be generated on the fly with some specific download tokens. Often, the JavaScript is obfuscated to make it harder to re-engineer it. Or the video information might be contained in an XML file that's loaded asynchronously by JS.



          For HTML5 progressive download video, the actual source file is usually mentioned directly in the source child of the video tag, so if you'd search the page for mp4 or similar. For example on German news show Tagesschau 100, you'll find:



          <source src="http://media.tagesschau.de/video/2014/0626/TV-20140626-1649-5801.webl.h264.mp4" type="video/mp4">


          For more advanced playback technologies like MPEG DASH or Apple's HTTP Live Streaming (HLS), you have to parse a meta-information file to get the actual video stream. The meta file (.mpd for example in DASH, and .m3u8 for HLS) will contain links to segments of video and audio, which you'd later have to combine to get a playable file.



          There's no general solution for this. It requires careful inspection and debugging of the target site.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Jun 26 '14 at 16:47

























          answered Jun 26 '14 at 12:57









          slhckslhck

          160k47445467




          160k47445467








          • 3





            One question, what is Youtube/Google's policy on this? Are they ok with this, or not so much?

            – JMK
            Jun 26 '14 at 15:53






          • 31





            The YouTube Terms of Service in §5.1.L disallow consumption of their content through any other means than streaming, so theoretically it's not allowed. In practice, they won't be able to enforce that though. Any downloader can more or less simulate that it's just streaming.

            – slhck
            Jun 26 '14 at 16:23








          • 2





            @StevenPenny do you have any non minified version of that?

            – TankorSmash
            Jun 26 '14 at 18:08






          • 5





            @slhck Flash could also make HTTP requests by itself. Instead, it uses the browser’s HTTP engine. If Flash itself made the requests, they wouldn’t be “visible” to the browser. Sure would be great for advertisers. ;)

            – Daniel B
            Jun 26 '14 at 19:49






          • 3





            @slhck they can't enforce it programmatically, but if they got their lawyer team out could they enforce it legally?

            – Cruncher
            Jun 27 '14 at 15:45














          • 3





            One question, what is Youtube/Google's policy on this? Are they ok with this, or not so much?

            – JMK
            Jun 26 '14 at 15:53






          • 31





            The YouTube Terms of Service in §5.1.L disallow consumption of their content through any other means than streaming, so theoretically it's not allowed. In practice, they won't be able to enforce that though. Any downloader can more or less simulate that it's just streaming.

            – slhck
            Jun 26 '14 at 16:23








          • 2





            @StevenPenny do you have any non minified version of that?

            – TankorSmash
            Jun 26 '14 at 18:08






          • 5





            @slhck Flash could also make HTTP requests by itself. Instead, it uses the browser’s HTTP engine. If Flash itself made the requests, they wouldn’t be “visible” to the browser. Sure would be great for advertisers. ;)

            – Daniel B
            Jun 26 '14 at 19:49






          • 3





            @slhck they can't enforce it programmatically, but if they got their lawyer team out could they enforce it legally?

            – Cruncher
            Jun 27 '14 at 15:45








          3




          3





          One question, what is Youtube/Google's policy on this? Are they ok with this, or not so much?

          – JMK
          Jun 26 '14 at 15:53





          One question, what is Youtube/Google's policy on this? Are they ok with this, or not so much?

          – JMK
          Jun 26 '14 at 15:53




          31




          31





          The YouTube Terms of Service in §5.1.L disallow consumption of their content through any other means than streaming, so theoretically it's not allowed. In practice, they won't be able to enforce that though. Any downloader can more or less simulate that it's just streaming.

          – slhck
          Jun 26 '14 at 16:23







          The YouTube Terms of Service in §5.1.L disallow consumption of their content through any other means than streaming, so theoretically it's not allowed. In practice, they won't be able to enforce that though. Any downloader can more or less simulate that it's just streaming.

          – slhck
          Jun 26 '14 at 16:23






          2




          2





          @StevenPenny do you have any non minified version of that?

          – TankorSmash
          Jun 26 '14 at 18:08





          @StevenPenny do you have any non minified version of that?

          – TankorSmash
          Jun 26 '14 at 18:08




          5




          5





          @slhck Flash could also make HTTP requests by itself. Instead, it uses the browser’s HTTP engine. If Flash itself made the requests, they wouldn’t be “visible” to the browser. Sure would be great for advertisers. ;)

          – Daniel B
          Jun 26 '14 at 19:49





          @slhck Flash could also make HTTP requests by itself. Instead, it uses the browser’s HTTP engine. If Flash itself made the requests, they wouldn’t be “visible” to the browser. Sure would be great for advertisers. ;)

          – Daniel B
          Jun 26 '14 at 19:49




          3




          3





          @slhck they can't enforce it programmatically, but if they got their lawyer team out could they enforce it legally?

          – Cruncher
          Jun 27 '14 at 15:45





          @slhck they can't enforce it programmatically, but if they got their lawyer team out could they enforce it legally?

          – Cruncher
          Jun 27 '14 at 15:45













          32














          YouTube Bookmarklet



          This is how I did it with JavaScript



          Start with ytplayer.config.args object. This contains all URLs for the video.
          It is broken up into



          url_encoded_fmt_stream_map // traditional: contains video and audio stream
          adaptive_fmts // DASH: contains video or audio stream


          Each of these is a comma separated array of what I would call "stream objects".
          Each "stream object" will contain values like this



          url  // direct HTTP link to a video
          itag // code specifying the quality
          s // signature, security measure to counter downloading


          Each URL
          will be encoded so you will need
          to decode them. Now the tricky part.



          YouTube has at least 3 security levels for their videos



          unsecured // as expected, you can download these with just the unencoded URL
          s // see below
          RTMPE // uses "rtmpe://" protocol, no known method for these


          The RTMPE videos are typically used on official full length movies, and are
          protected with SWF Verification Type 2. This has been around
          since 2011
          and has yet to be reverse engineered.



          The type "s" videos are the most difficult that can actually be downloaded. You
          will typcially see these on VEVO videos and the like. They start with a
          signature such as



          AA5D05FA7771AD4868BA4C977C3DEAAC620DE020E.0F421820F42978A1F8EAFCDAC4EF507DB5


          Then the signature is scrambled with a function like this



          function mo(a) {
          a = a.split("");
          a = lo.rw(a, 1);
          a = lo.rw(a, 32);
          a = lo.IC(a, 1);
          a = lo.wS(a, 77);
          a = lo.IC(a, 3);
          a = lo.wS(a, 77);
          a = lo.IC(a, 3);
          a = lo.wS(a, 44);
          return a.join("")
          }


          This function is dynamic, it typically changes every day. To make it more
          difficult the function is hosted at a URL such as



          http://s.ytimg.com/yts/jsbin/html5player-en_US-vflycBCEX.js


          this introduces the problem of
          Same-origin policy. Essentially,
          you cannot download this file from www.youtube.com because they are
          different domains. A workaround of this problem is
          CORS. With CORS,
          s.ytimg.com could add this header



          Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://www.youtube.com


          and it would allow the JavaScript to download from www.youtube.com. Of course
          they do not do this. A workaround for this workaround is to use a CORS proxy.
          This is a proxy that responds with the following header to all requests



          Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *


          So, now that you have proxied your JS file, and used the function to scramble
          the signature, you can use that in the querystring to download a video.






          share|improve this answer





















          • 1





            Do you happen to know (for DASH playback) how the YouTube player determines the byte ranges to be requested from the media representation? The MPD file only lists segments.

            – slhck
            Jul 9 '14 at 12:51






          • 2





            Not exactly.. There is a single file for video and audio, but YouTube requests them by byte ranges, in several chunks. If you switch to another quality, it'll change the byte range too. Just wondering how the player knows which second corresponds to which byte offset.

            – slhck
            Jul 9 '14 at 16:25






          • 1





            Can you give an example of an s type video and RTMPE type video?

            – Chloe
            May 3 '16 at 5:10











          • @SurajJain here is new page - I will be rewriting this answer as I use a different method now github.com/svnpenn/umber/blob/master/bmklet/youtube/download.js

            – Steven Penny
            Feb 19 '18 at 12:39
















          32














          YouTube Bookmarklet



          This is how I did it with JavaScript



          Start with ytplayer.config.args object. This contains all URLs for the video.
          It is broken up into



          url_encoded_fmt_stream_map // traditional: contains video and audio stream
          adaptive_fmts // DASH: contains video or audio stream


          Each of these is a comma separated array of what I would call "stream objects".
          Each "stream object" will contain values like this



          url  // direct HTTP link to a video
          itag // code specifying the quality
          s // signature, security measure to counter downloading


          Each URL
          will be encoded so you will need
          to decode them. Now the tricky part.



          YouTube has at least 3 security levels for their videos



          unsecured // as expected, you can download these with just the unencoded URL
          s // see below
          RTMPE // uses "rtmpe://" protocol, no known method for these


          The RTMPE videos are typically used on official full length movies, and are
          protected with SWF Verification Type 2. This has been around
          since 2011
          and has yet to be reverse engineered.



          The type "s" videos are the most difficult that can actually be downloaded. You
          will typcially see these on VEVO videos and the like. They start with a
          signature such as



          AA5D05FA7771AD4868BA4C977C3DEAAC620DE020E.0F421820F42978A1F8EAFCDAC4EF507DB5


          Then the signature is scrambled with a function like this



          function mo(a) {
          a = a.split("");
          a = lo.rw(a, 1);
          a = lo.rw(a, 32);
          a = lo.IC(a, 1);
          a = lo.wS(a, 77);
          a = lo.IC(a, 3);
          a = lo.wS(a, 77);
          a = lo.IC(a, 3);
          a = lo.wS(a, 44);
          return a.join("")
          }


          This function is dynamic, it typically changes every day. To make it more
          difficult the function is hosted at a URL such as



          http://s.ytimg.com/yts/jsbin/html5player-en_US-vflycBCEX.js


          this introduces the problem of
          Same-origin policy. Essentially,
          you cannot download this file from www.youtube.com because they are
          different domains. A workaround of this problem is
          CORS. With CORS,
          s.ytimg.com could add this header



          Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://www.youtube.com


          and it would allow the JavaScript to download from www.youtube.com. Of course
          they do not do this. A workaround for this workaround is to use a CORS proxy.
          This is a proxy that responds with the following header to all requests



          Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *


          So, now that you have proxied your JS file, and used the function to scramble
          the signature, you can use that in the querystring to download a video.






          share|improve this answer





















          • 1





            Do you happen to know (for DASH playback) how the YouTube player determines the byte ranges to be requested from the media representation? The MPD file only lists segments.

            – slhck
            Jul 9 '14 at 12:51






          • 2





            Not exactly.. There is a single file for video and audio, but YouTube requests them by byte ranges, in several chunks. If you switch to another quality, it'll change the byte range too. Just wondering how the player knows which second corresponds to which byte offset.

            – slhck
            Jul 9 '14 at 16:25






          • 1





            Can you give an example of an s type video and RTMPE type video?

            – Chloe
            May 3 '16 at 5:10











          • @SurajJain here is new page - I will be rewriting this answer as I use a different method now github.com/svnpenn/umber/blob/master/bmklet/youtube/download.js

            – Steven Penny
            Feb 19 '18 at 12:39














          32












          32








          32







          YouTube Bookmarklet



          This is how I did it with JavaScript



          Start with ytplayer.config.args object. This contains all URLs for the video.
          It is broken up into



          url_encoded_fmt_stream_map // traditional: contains video and audio stream
          adaptive_fmts // DASH: contains video or audio stream


          Each of these is a comma separated array of what I would call "stream objects".
          Each "stream object" will contain values like this



          url  // direct HTTP link to a video
          itag // code specifying the quality
          s // signature, security measure to counter downloading


          Each URL
          will be encoded so you will need
          to decode them. Now the tricky part.



          YouTube has at least 3 security levels for their videos



          unsecured // as expected, you can download these with just the unencoded URL
          s // see below
          RTMPE // uses "rtmpe://" protocol, no known method for these


          The RTMPE videos are typically used on official full length movies, and are
          protected with SWF Verification Type 2. This has been around
          since 2011
          and has yet to be reverse engineered.



          The type "s" videos are the most difficult that can actually be downloaded. You
          will typcially see these on VEVO videos and the like. They start with a
          signature such as



          AA5D05FA7771AD4868BA4C977C3DEAAC620DE020E.0F421820F42978A1F8EAFCDAC4EF507DB5


          Then the signature is scrambled with a function like this



          function mo(a) {
          a = a.split("");
          a = lo.rw(a, 1);
          a = lo.rw(a, 32);
          a = lo.IC(a, 1);
          a = lo.wS(a, 77);
          a = lo.IC(a, 3);
          a = lo.wS(a, 77);
          a = lo.IC(a, 3);
          a = lo.wS(a, 44);
          return a.join("")
          }


          This function is dynamic, it typically changes every day. To make it more
          difficult the function is hosted at a URL such as



          http://s.ytimg.com/yts/jsbin/html5player-en_US-vflycBCEX.js


          this introduces the problem of
          Same-origin policy. Essentially,
          you cannot download this file from www.youtube.com because they are
          different domains. A workaround of this problem is
          CORS. With CORS,
          s.ytimg.com could add this header



          Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://www.youtube.com


          and it would allow the JavaScript to download from www.youtube.com. Of course
          they do not do this. A workaround for this workaround is to use a CORS proxy.
          This is a proxy that responds with the following header to all requests



          Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *


          So, now that you have proxied your JS file, and used the function to scramble
          the signature, you can use that in the querystring to download a video.






          share|improve this answer















          YouTube Bookmarklet



          This is how I did it with JavaScript



          Start with ytplayer.config.args object. This contains all URLs for the video.
          It is broken up into



          url_encoded_fmt_stream_map // traditional: contains video and audio stream
          adaptive_fmts // DASH: contains video or audio stream


          Each of these is a comma separated array of what I would call "stream objects".
          Each "stream object" will contain values like this



          url  // direct HTTP link to a video
          itag // code specifying the quality
          s // signature, security measure to counter downloading


          Each URL
          will be encoded so you will need
          to decode them. Now the tricky part.



          YouTube has at least 3 security levels for their videos



          unsecured // as expected, you can download these with just the unencoded URL
          s // see below
          RTMPE // uses "rtmpe://" protocol, no known method for these


          The RTMPE videos are typically used on official full length movies, and are
          protected with SWF Verification Type 2. This has been around
          since 2011
          and has yet to be reverse engineered.



          The type "s" videos are the most difficult that can actually be downloaded. You
          will typcially see these on VEVO videos and the like. They start with a
          signature such as



          AA5D05FA7771AD4868BA4C977C3DEAAC620DE020E.0F421820F42978A1F8EAFCDAC4EF507DB5


          Then the signature is scrambled with a function like this



          function mo(a) {
          a = a.split("");
          a = lo.rw(a, 1);
          a = lo.rw(a, 32);
          a = lo.IC(a, 1);
          a = lo.wS(a, 77);
          a = lo.IC(a, 3);
          a = lo.wS(a, 77);
          a = lo.IC(a, 3);
          a = lo.wS(a, 44);
          return a.join("")
          }


          This function is dynamic, it typically changes every day. To make it more
          difficult the function is hosted at a URL such as



          http://s.ytimg.com/yts/jsbin/html5player-en_US-vflycBCEX.js


          this introduces the problem of
          Same-origin policy. Essentially,
          you cannot download this file from www.youtube.com because they are
          different domains. A workaround of this problem is
          CORS. With CORS,
          s.ytimg.com could add this header



          Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://www.youtube.com


          and it would allow the JavaScript to download from www.youtube.com. Of course
          they do not do this. A workaround for this workaround is to use a CORS proxy.
          This is a proxy that responds with the following header to all requests



          Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *


          So, now that you have proxied your JS file, and used the function to scramble
          the signature, you can use that in the querystring to download a video.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Jul 19 '18 at 15:55

























          answered Jun 27 '14 at 5:09









          Steven PennySteven Penny

          1




          1








          • 1





            Do you happen to know (for DASH playback) how the YouTube player determines the byte ranges to be requested from the media representation? The MPD file only lists segments.

            – slhck
            Jul 9 '14 at 12:51






          • 2





            Not exactly.. There is a single file for video and audio, but YouTube requests them by byte ranges, in several chunks. If you switch to another quality, it'll change the byte range too. Just wondering how the player knows which second corresponds to which byte offset.

            – slhck
            Jul 9 '14 at 16:25






          • 1





            Can you give an example of an s type video and RTMPE type video?

            – Chloe
            May 3 '16 at 5:10











          • @SurajJain here is new page - I will be rewriting this answer as I use a different method now github.com/svnpenn/umber/blob/master/bmklet/youtube/download.js

            – Steven Penny
            Feb 19 '18 at 12:39














          • 1





            Do you happen to know (for DASH playback) how the YouTube player determines the byte ranges to be requested from the media representation? The MPD file only lists segments.

            – slhck
            Jul 9 '14 at 12:51






          • 2





            Not exactly.. There is a single file for video and audio, but YouTube requests them by byte ranges, in several chunks. If you switch to another quality, it'll change the byte range too. Just wondering how the player knows which second corresponds to which byte offset.

            – slhck
            Jul 9 '14 at 16:25






          • 1





            Can you give an example of an s type video and RTMPE type video?

            – Chloe
            May 3 '16 at 5:10











          • @SurajJain here is new page - I will be rewriting this answer as I use a different method now github.com/svnpenn/umber/blob/master/bmklet/youtube/download.js

            – Steven Penny
            Feb 19 '18 at 12:39








          1




          1





          Do you happen to know (for DASH playback) how the YouTube player determines the byte ranges to be requested from the media representation? The MPD file only lists segments.

          – slhck
          Jul 9 '14 at 12:51





          Do you happen to know (for DASH playback) how the YouTube player determines the byte ranges to be requested from the media representation? The MPD file only lists segments.

          – slhck
          Jul 9 '14 at 12:51




          2




          2





          Not exactly.. There is a single file for video and audio, but YouTube requests them by byte ranges, in several chunks. If you switch to another quality, it'll change the byte range too. Just wondering how the player knows which second corresponds to which byte offset.

          – slhck
          Jul 9 '14 at 16:25





          Not exactly.. There is a single file for video and audio, but YouTube requests them by byte ranges, in several chunks. If you switch to another quality, it'll change the byte range too. Just wondering how the player knows which second corresponds to which byte offset.

          – slhck
          Jul 9 '14 at 16:25




          1




          1





          Can you give an example of an s type video and RTMPE type video?

          – Chloe
          May 3 '16 at 5:10





          Can you give an example of an s type video and RTMPE type video?

          – Chloe
          May 3 '16 at 5:10













          @SurajJain here is new page - I will be rewriting this answer as I use a different method now github.com/svnpenn/umber/blob/master/bmklet/youtube/download.js

          – Steven Penny
          Feb 19 '18 at 12:39





          @SurajJain here is new page - I will be rewriting this answer as I use a different method now github.com/svnpenn/umber/blob/master/bmklet/youtube/download.js

          – Steven Penny
          Feb 19 '18 at 12:39











          0














          My answer:
          from 22 January 2019, using these methods can get caught if you try to bypass without linking your user information as well.



          Why?
          since I'm a new user to this platform, I cannot comment for rule specified by @Daniel-B. According to new ToS (in German as I am in Germany; please translate) for YouTube under $6.1 G$:




          You agree any automated system (including – but not limited to – any robot, spider or offline reader) to use that on the website accesses in such a way that more requests to the server within a specified time YouTube directed being able to reasonably produce as a human within the same time period using a publicly available, unmodified standard web browser;




          Now they can find out the time duration for each request and can track if you are violating. How is it possible now, given this scenario and your external IP address will be known even if you use a VPN to protect yourself without linking details of user to any service.






          share|improve this answer





















          • 1





            Welcome traveler from the future...It isn’t clear how this answers the author’s question

            – Ramhound
            Dec 27 '18 at 22:31











          • If you wanted to warn the author, with regards to a specific answer, you should have submitted a comment and downvoted any answer you didn't think was helpful due to the possible legal issues that could follow. This answer reads more like what you would find on a discussion forum post, and Super User, isn't a discussion forum

            – Ramhound
            Jan 13 at 0:34


















          0














          My answer:
          from 22 January 2019, using these methods can get caught if you try to bypass without linking your user information as well.



          Why?
          since I'm a new user to this platform, I cannot comment for rule specified by @Daniel-B. According to new ToS (in German as I am in Germany; please translate) for YouTube under $6.1 G$:




          You agree any automated system (including – but not limited to – any robot, spider or offline reader) to use that on the website accesses in such a way that more requests to the server within a specified time YouTube directed being able to reasonably produce as a human within the same time period using a publicly available, unmodified standard web browser;




          Now they can find out the time duration for each request and can track if you are violating. How is it possible now, given this scenario and your external IP address will be known even if you use a VPN to protect yourself without linking details of user to any service.






          share|improve this answer





















          • 1





            Welcome traveler from the future...It isn’t clear how this answers the author’s question

            – Ramhound
            Dec 27 '18 at 22:31











          • If you wanted to warn the author, with regards to a specific answer, you should have submitted a comment and downvoted any answer you didn't think was helpful due to the possible legal issues that could follow. This answer reads more like what you would find on a discussion forum post, and Super User, isn't a discussion forum

            – Ramhound
            Jan 13 at 0:34
















          0












          0








          0







          My answer:
          from 22 January 2019, using these methods can get caught if you try to bypass without linking your user information as well.



          Why?
          since I'm a new user to this platform, I cannot comment for rule specified by @Daniel-B. According to new ToS (in German as I am in Germany; please translate) for YouTube under $6.1 G$:




          You agree any automated system (including – but not limited to – any robot, spider or offline reader) to use that on the website accesses in such a way that more requests to the server within a specified time YouTube directed being able to reasonably produce as a human within the same time period using a publicly available, unmodified standard web browser;




          Now they can find out the time duration for each request and can track if you are violating. How is it possible now, given this scenario and your external IP address will be known even if you use a VPN to protect yourself without linking details of user to any service.






          share|improve this answer















          My answer:
          from 22 January 2019, using these methods can get caught if you try to bypass without linking your user information as well.



          Why?
          since I'm a new user to this platform, I cannot comment for rule specified by @Daniel-B. According to new ToS (in German as I am in Germany; please translate) for YouTube under $6.1 G$:




          You agree any automated system (including – but not limited to – any robot, spider or offline reader) to use that on the website accesses in such a way that more requests to the server within a specified time YouTube directed being able to reasonably produce as a human within the same time period using a publicly available, unmodified standard web browser;




          Now they can find out the time duration for each request and can track if you are violating. How is it possible now, given this scenario and your external IP address will be known even if you use a VPN to protect yourself without linking details of user to any service.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Dec 27 '18 at 22:52









          Scott

          15.7k113990




          15.7k113990










          answered Dec 27 '18 at 22:06









          user103720user103720

          91




          91








          • 1





            Welcome traveler from the future...It isn’t clear how this answers the author’s question

            – Ramhound
            Dec 27 '18 at 22:31











          • If you wanted to warn the author, with regards to a specific answer, you should have submitted a comment and downvoted any answer you didn't think was helpful due to the possible legal issues that could follow. This answer reads more like what you would find on a discussion forum post, and Super User, isn't a discussion forum

            – Ramhound
            Jan 13 at 0:34
















          • 1





            Welcome traveler from the future...It isn’t clear how this answers the author’s question

            – Ramhound
            Dec 27 '18 at 22:31











          • If you wanted to warn the author, with regards to a specific answer, you should have submitted a comment and downvoted any answer you didn't think was helpful due to the possible legal issues that could follow. This answer reads more like what you would find on a discussion forum post, and Super User, isn't a discussion forum

            – Ramhound
            Jan 13 at 0:34










          1




          1





          Welcome traveler from the future...It isn’t clear how this answers the author’s question

          – Ramhound
          Dec 27 '18 at 22:31





          Welcome traveler from the future...It isn’t clear how this answers the author’s question

          – Ramhound
          Dec 27 '18 at 22:31













          If you wanted to warn the author, with regards to a specific answer, you should have submitted a comment and downvoted any answer you didn't think was helpful due to the possible legal issues that could follow. This answer reads more like what you would find on a discussion forum post, and Super User, isn't a discussion forum

          – Ramhound
          Jan 13 at 0:34







          If you wanted to warn the author, with regards to a specific answer, you should have submitted a comment and downvoted any answer you didn't think was helpful due to the possible legal issues that could follow. This answer reads more like what you would find on a discussion forum post, and Super User, isn't a discussion forum

          – Ramhound
          Jan 13 at 0:34







          protected by Ramhound Dec 27 '18 at 22:31



          Thank you for your interest in this question.
          Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



          Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?



          Popular posts from this blog

          Сан-Квентин

          Алькесар

          Josef Freinademetz