Split Data equally to Thread in java












0












$begingroup$



Is this efficient way to split the record which is comes from database
? So that thread will process the record based on the start and end
point .




Step 1: Get the total No of Record from Database. ie (Select count(*) from employee)  ie (example:  totalRecordsFromDB=121);
Step 2 :Equally share the data to thread ie (example :totalThreadSize=3)
Step 3 : calculate the start/end point and trigger the thread.
Step 4 : Based on the start/end i will trigger the thread.ie
(select * from employee where empid >=start and empid<=end)

import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Map;

/**
* @author dhava
*
*/
public class CoreLogic {

/**
* @param args
*/
public static void main(String args) {
// TODO Auto-generated method stub

int totalRecordsFromDB=121;
int totalThreadSize=3;
int spanStart=1;
int spanLimit=totalRecordsFromDB/totalThreadSize;
int counter=1;
Map<String,List<Integer>> result=new HashMap<String,List<Integer>>();
List<Integer> sublist=new ArrayList<Integer>();
int totalRecordForSpan=1;
int startNode=0;
int endNode=0;
int spliter=1;

for(int i=1;i<=totalRecordsFromDB;i++) {

if(spanStart==totalRecordForSpan) {
startNode=i;
sublist=new ArrayList<Integer>();
sublist.add(startNode);
}
else if(spanLimit==totalRecordForSpan && spliter!=totalThreadSize) {
endNode=i;

totalRecordForSpan=0;
sublist.add(endNode);
result.put("Split_"+spliter,sublist);
spliter++;
// <<start the thread >>
}
else if(totalRecordsFromDB==counter) {
endNode=i;
sublist.add(endNode);
result.put("Split_"+spliter,sublist);
//<< start the thread >>


}
totalRecordForSpan++;
counter++;
}
System.out.println(result);
}

}


The given below is output.(start/end point in arraylist)



{Split_3=[81, 121], Split_2=[41, 80], Split_1=[1, 40]}

Please refer the given below queries.
1. Is this design/code is good ? - I have thread Limit.
2. Is any other approach or design for better performance ?
3. Is there any way in spring-batch to configure the thread?


Note : i am going to handle the huge volume of data with limited number of thread.









share











$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$



    Is this efficient way to split the record which is comes from database
    ? So that thread will process the record based on the start and end
    point .




    Step 1: Get the total No of Record from Database. ie (Select count(*) from employee)  ie (example:  totalRecordsFromDB=121);
    Step 2 :Equally share the data to thread ie (example :totalThreadSize=3)
    Step 3 : calculate the start/end point and trigger the thread.
    Step 4 : Based on the start/end i will trigger the thread.ie
    (select * from employee where empid >=start and empid<=end)

    import java.util.ArrayList;
    import java.util.HashMap;
    import java.util.List;
    import java.util.Map;

    /**
    * @author dhava
    *
    */
    public class CoreLogic {

    /**
    * @param args
    */
    public static void main(String args) {
    // TODO Auto-generated method stub

    int totalRecordsFromDB=121;
    int totalThreadSize=3;
    int spanStart=1;
    int spanLimit=totalRecordsFromDB/totalThreadSize;
    int counter=1;
    Map<String,List<Integer>> result=new HashMap<String,List<Integer>>();
    List<Integer> sublist=new ArrayList<Integer>();
    int totalRecordForSpan=1;
    int startNode=0;
    int endNode=0;
    int spliter=1;

    for(int i=1;i<=totalRecordsFromDB;i++) {

    if(spanStart==totalRecordForSpan) {
    startNode=i;
    sublist=new ArrayList<Integer>();
    sublist.add(startNode);
    }
    else if(spanLimit==totalRecordForSpan && spliter!=totalThreadSize) {
    endNode=i;

    totalRecordForSpan=0;
    sublist.add(endNode);
    result.put("Split_"+spliter,sublist);
    spliter++;
    // <<start the thread >>
    }
    else if(totalRecordsFromDB==counter) {
    endNode=i;
    sublist.add(endNode);
    result.put("Split_"+spliter,sublist);
    //<< start the thread >>


    }
    totalRecordForSpan++;
    counter++;
    }
    System.out.println(result);
    }

    }


    The given below is output.(start/end point in arraylist)



    {Split_3=[81, 121], Split_2=[41, 80], Split_1=[1, 40]}

    Please refer the given below queries.
    1. Is this design/code is good ? - I have thread Limit.
    2. Is any other approach or design for better performance ?
    3. Is there any way in spring-batch to configure the thread?


    Note : i am going to handle the huge volume of data with limited number of thread.









    share











    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$



      Is this efficient way to split the record which is comes from database
      ? So that thread will process the record based on the start and end
      point .




      Step 1: Get the total No of Record from Database. ie (Select count(*) from employee)  ie (example:  totalRecordsFromDB=121);
      Step 2 :Equally share the data to thread ie (example :totalThreadSize=3)
      Step 3 : calculate the start/end point and trigger the thread.
      Step 4 : Based on the start/end i will trigger the thread.ie
      (select * from employee where empid >=start and empid<=end)

      import java.util.ArrayList;
      import java.util.HashMap;
      import java.util.List;
      import java.util.Map;

      /**
      * @author dhava
      *
      */
      public class CoreLogic {

      /**
      * @param args
      */
      public static void main(String args) {
      // TODO Auto-generated method stub

      int totalRecordsFromDB=121;
      int totalThreadSize=3;
      int spanStart=1;
      int spanLimit=totalRecordsFromDB/totalThreadSize;
      int counter=1;
      Map<String,List<Integer>> result=new HashMap<String,List<Integer>>();
      List<Integer> sublist=new ArrayList<Integer>();
      int totalRecordForSpan=1;
      int startNode=0;
      int endNode=0;
      int spliter=1;

      for(int i=1;i<=totalRecordsFromDB;i++) {

      if(spanStart==totalRecordForSpan) {
      startNode=i;
      sublist=new ArrayList<Integer>();
      sublist.add(startNode);
      }
      else if(spanLimit==totalRecordForSpan && spliter!=totalThreadSize) {
      endNode=i;

      totalRecordForSpan=0;
      sublist.add(endNode);
      result.put("Split_"+spliter,sublist);
      spliter++;
      // <<start the thread >>
      }
      else if(totalRecordsFromDB==counter) {
      endNode=i;
      sublist.add(endNode);
      result.put("Split_"+spliter,sublist);
      //<< start the thread >>


      }
      totalRecordForSpan++;
      counter++;
      }
      System.out.println(result);
      }

      }


      The given below is output.(start/end point in arraylist)



      {Split_3=[81, 121], Split_2=[41, 80], Split_1=[1, 40]}

      Please refer the given below queries.
      1. Is this design/code is good ? - I have thread Limit.
      2. Is any other approach or design for better performance ?
      3. Is there any way in spring-batch to configure the thread?


      Note : i am going to handle the huge volume of data with limited number of thread.









      share











      $endgroup$





      Is this efficient way to split the record which is comes from database
      ? So that thread will process the record based on the start and end
      point .




      Step 1: Get the total No of Record from Database. ie (Select count(*) from employee)  ie (example:  totalRecordsFromDB=121);
      Step 2 :Equally share the data to thread ie (example :totalThreadSize=3)
      Step 3 : calculate the start/end point and trigger the thread.
      Step 4 : Based on the start/end i will trigger the thread.ie
      (select * from employee where empid >=start and empid<=end)

      import java.util.ArrayList;
      import java.util.HashMap;
      import java.util.List;
      import java.util.Map;

      /**
      * @author dhava
      *
      */
      public class CoreLogic {

      /**
      * @param args
      */
      public static void main(String args) {
      // TODO Auto-generated method stub

      int totalRecordsFromDB=121;
      int totalThreadSize=3;
      int spanStart=1;
      int spanLimit=totalRecordsFromDB/totalThreadSize;
      int counter=1;
      Map<String,List<Integer>> result=new HashMap<String,List<Integer>>();
      List<Integer> sublist=new ArrayList<Integer>();
      int totalRecordForSpan=1;
      int startNode=0;
      int endNode=0;
      int spliter=1;

      for(int i=1;i<=totalRecordsFromDB;i++) {

      if(spanStart==totalRecordForSpan) {
      startNode=i;
      sublist=new ArrayList<Integer>();
      sublist.add(startNode);
      }
      else if(spanLimit==totalRecordForSpan && spliter!=totalThreadSize) {
      endNode=i;

      totalRecordForSpan=0;
      sublist.add(endNode);
      result.put("Split_"+spliter,sublist);
      spliter++;
      // <<start the thread >>
      }
      else if(totalRecordsFromDB==counter) {
      endNode=i;
      sublist.add(endNode);
      result.put("Split_"+spliter,sublist);
      //<< start the thread >>


      }
      totalRecordForSpan++;
      counter++;
      }
      System.out.println(result);
      }

      }


      The given below is output.(start/end point in arraylist)



      {Split_3=[81, 121], Split_2=[41, 80], Split_1=[1, 40]}

      Please refer the given below queries.
      1. Is this design/code is good ? - I have thread Limit.
      2. Is any other approach or design for better performance ?
      3. Is there any way in spring-batch to configure the thread?


      Note : i am going to handle the huge volume of data with limited number of thread.







      java multithreading spring batch





      share














      share












      share



      share








      edited 4 mins ago







      Vasanth

















      asked 9 mins ago









      VasanthVasanth

      184




      184






















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "196"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f213164%2fsplit-data-equally-to-thread-in-java%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f213164%2fsplit-data-equally-to-thread-in-java%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Terni

          A new problem with tex4ht and tikz

          Sun Ra