A question concerning the developing map of (G,X) manifolds












2












$begingroup$


Let $M$ be a $(G,X)$ manifold, that is we have local charts $(U,varphi_U)$ on $M$ with $varphi_U$ a diffeomorphism onto an open subset of $X$ and the transition maps are locally-$G$.



Let $mathfrak{p}:widetilde{M}rightarrow M$ be the universal covering of $M$.



The developing map theorem introduces a local diffeomorphism $dev:widetilde{M}rightarrow X$.



Does the developing map locally commute with the (restricted) covering and local charts, i.e. for $widetilde{U}$ (small enough) $dev|_widetilde{U}=varphi_{U}circmathfrak{p}|_widetilde{U}$ for some $varphi_U$?






dg.differential-geometry







share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




user135350 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It's hard to make sense of the question (the last sentence). What's "small enough $tilde{U}$"? what's "for some $varphi_U$" when $varphi_U$ is already introduced?
    $endgroup$
    – YCor
    4 hours ago
















2












$begingroup$


Let $M$ be a $(G,X)$ manifold, that is we have local charts $(U,varphi_U)$ on $M$ with $varphi_U$ a diffeomorphism onto an open subset of $X$ and the transition maps are locally-$G$.



Let $mathfrak{p}:widetilde{M}rightarrow M$ be the universal covering of $M$.



The developing map theorem introduces a local diffeomorphism $dev:widetilde{M}rightarrow X$.



Does the developing map locally commute with the (restricted) covering and local charts, i.e. for $widetilde{U}$ (small enough) $dev|_widetilde{U}=varphi_{U}circmathfrak{p}|_widetilde{U}$ for some $varphi_U$?






dg.differential-geometry







share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




user135350 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It's hard to make sense of the question (the last sentence). What's "small enough $tilde{U}$"? what's "for some $varphi_U$" when $varphi_U$ is already introduced?
    $endgroup$
    – YCor
    4 hours ago














2












2








2





$begingroup$


Let $M$ be a $(G,X)$ manifold, that is we have local charts $(U,varphi_U)$ on $M$ with $varphi_U$ a diffeomorphism onto an open subset of $X$ and the transition maps are locally-$G$.



Let $mathfrak{p}:widetilde{M}rightarrow M$ be the universal covering of $M$.



The developing map theorem introduces a local diffeomorphism $dev:widetilde{M}rightarrow X$.



Does the developing map locally commute with the (restricted) covering and local charts, i.e. for $widetilde{U}$ (small enough) $dev|_widetilde{U}=varphi_{U}circmathfrak{p}|_widetilde{U}$ for some $varphi_U$?






dg.differential-geometry







share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




user135350 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




Let $M$ be a $(G,X)$ manifold, that is we have local charts $(U,varphi_U)$ on $M$ with $varphi_U$ a diffeomorphism onto an open subset of $X$ and the transition maps are locally-$G$.



Let $mathfrak{p}:widetilde{M}rightarrow M$ be the universal covering of $M$.



The developing map theorem introduces a local diffeomorphism $dev:widetilde{M}rightarrow X$.



Does the developing map locally commute with the (restricted) covering and local charts, i.e. for $widetilde{U}$ (small enough) $dev|_widetilde{U}=varphi_{U}circmathfrak{p}|_widetilde{U}$ for some $varphi_U$?






dg.differential-geometry




dg.differential-geometry






share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




user135350 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




user135350 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question






New contributor




user135350 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 4 hours ago









user135350user135350

111




111




New contributor




user135350 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





user135350 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






user135350 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It's hard to make sense of the question (the last sentence). What's "small enough $tilde{U}$"? what's "for some $varphi_U$" when $varphi_U$ is already introduced?
    $endgroup$
    – YCor
    4 hours ago














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It's hard to make sense of the question (the last sentence). What's "small enough $tilde{U}$"? what's "for some $varphi_U$" when $varphi_U$ is already introduced?
    $endgroup$
    – YCor
    4 hours ago








1




1




$begingroup$
It's hard to make sense of the question (the last sentence). What's "small enough $tilde{U}$"? what's "for some $varphi_U$" when $varphi_U$ is already introduced?
$endgroup$
– YCor
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
It's hard to make sense of the question (the last sentence). What's "small enough $tilde{U}$"? what's "for some $varphi_U$" when $varphi_U$ is already introduced?
$endgroup$
– YCor
4 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

The best way to see this is to read the proof of the existence of the developing map.
The $(X,G)$ structure on $M$ induces an $(X,G)$-structure on $tilde M$ its universal cover such that for any $tilde xin tilde M$, write $x=p(tilde x)$ where $p$ is the covering map. Consider a chart $xin U$ such that there exists $tilde U$ which contains $tilde x$ such that the restriction of $p$ to $tilde U$, $p_{tilde U}:tilde Urightarrow U$ is an homeomorphism $phi_{tilde U}=phi_Ucirc p_{tilde U}$.



To construct the developing map, one fixes $tilde x_0in tilde M$ for every $tilde xin hat M$, one considers a path $c:[0,1]rightarrow hat M$ such that $c(0)=tilde x_0$ and $c(1)=tilde x$, then one consider chart $(tilde U_0,tilde phi_0),...(tilde U_n,tildephi_n)$ such that there exists a subdivision $[0=t_0,t_1,...,t_n=1]$ such that $c[t_i,t_{i+1}]subset tilde U_i$ and one sets:



$D(tilde x)=tilde g_0...g_{n-1}tildephi_n(tilde x)$ where $g_iin G$ such that $tilde phi_icirc{tildephi_{i+1}}^{-1}$ is the restriction of $g_i$ to $tildephi_{i+1}(tilde U_{i+1})$.



This shows that if we set $U_n=p(tilde U_n)$, we can define the chart $(U_n,g_0...g_{n-1}phi_n)$ of $x$ and the chart $(tilde U_n,g_0...g_{n-1}tilde phi_n)$ which answer your question.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "504"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });






    user135350 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f322330%2fa-question-concerning-the-developing-map-of-g-x-manifolds%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2












    $begingroup$

    The best way to see this is to read the proof of the existence of the developing map.
    The $(X,G)$ structure on $M$ induces an $(X,G)$-structure on $tilde M$ its universal cover such that for any $tilde xin tilde M$, write $x=p(tilde x)$ where $p$ is the covering map. Consider a chart $xin U$ such that there exists $tilde U$ which contains $tilde x$ such that the restriction of $p$ to $tilde U$, $p_{tilde U}:tilde Urightarrow U$ is an homeomorphism $phi_{tilde U}=phi_Ucirc p_{tilde U}$.



    To construct the developing map, one fixes $tilde x_0in tilde M$ for every $tilde xin hat M$, one considers a path $c:[0,1]rightarrow hat M$ such that $c(0)=tilde x_0$ and $c(1)=tilde x$, then one consider chart $(tilde U_0,tilde phi_0),...(tilde U_n,tildephi_n)$ such that there exists a subdivision $[0=t_0,t_1,...,t_n=1]$ such that $c[t_i,t_{i+1}]subset tilde U_i$ and one sets:



    $D(tilde x)=tilde g_0...g_{n-1}tildephi_n(tilde x)$ where $g_iin G$ such that $tilde phi_icirc{tildephi_{i+1}}^{-1}$ is the restriction of $g_i$ to $tildephi_{i+1}(tilde U_{i+1})$.



    This shows that if we set $U_n=p(tilde U_n)$, we can define the chart $(U_n,g_0...g_{n-1}phi_n)$ of $x$ and the chart $(tilde U_n,g_0...g_{n-1}tilde phi_n)$ which answer your question.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      2












      $begingroup$

      The best way to see this is to read the proof of the existence of the developing map.
      The $(X,G)$ structure on $M$ induces an $(X,G)$-structure on $tilde M$ its universal cover such that for any $tilde xin tilde M$, write $x=p(tilde x)$ where $p$ is the covering map. Consider a chart $xin U$ such that there exists $tilde U$ which contains $tilde x$ such that the restriction of $p$ to $tilde U$, $p_{tilde U}:tilde Urightarrow U$ is an homeomorphism $phi_{tilde U}=phi_Ucirc p_{tilde U}$.



      To construct the developing map, one fixes $tilde x_0in tilde M$ for every $tilde xin hat M$, one considers a path $c:[0,1]rightarrow hat M$ such that $c(0)=tilde x_0$ and $c(1)=tilde x$, then one consider chart $(tilde U_0,tilde phi_0),...(tilde U_n,tildephi_n)$ such that there exists a subdivision $[0=t_0,t_1,...,t_n=1]$ such that $c[t_i,t_{i+1}]subset tilde U_i$ and one sets:



      $D(tilde x)=tilde g_0...g_{n-1}tildephi_n(tilde x)$ where $g_iin G$ such that $tilde phi_icirc{tildephi_{i+1}}^{-1}$ is the restriction of $g_i$ to $tildephi_{i+1}(tilde U_{i+1})$.



      This shows that if we set $U_n=p(tilde U_n)$, we can define the chart $(U_n,g_0...g_{n-1}phi_n)$ of $x$ and the chart $(tilde U_n,g_0...g_{n-1}tilde phi_n)$ which answer your question.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        2












        2








        2





        $begingroup$

        The best way to see this is to read the proof of the existence of the developing map.
        The $(X,G)$ structure on $M$ induces an $(X,G)$-structure on $tilde M$ its universal cover such that for any $tilde xin tilde M$, write $x=p(tilde x)$ where $p$ is the covering map. Consider a chart $xin U$ such that there exists $tilde U$ which contains $tilde x$ such that the restriction of $p$ to $tilde U$, $p_{tilde U}:tilde Urightarrow U$ is an homeomorphism $phi_{tilde U}=phi_Ucirc p_{tilde U}$.



        To construct the developing map, one fixes $tilde x_0in tilde M$ for every $tilde xin hat M$, one considers a path $c:[0,1]rightarrow hat M$ such that $c(0)=tilde x_0$ and $c(1)=tilde x$, then one consider chart $(tilde U_0,tilde phi_0),...(tilde U_n,tildephi_n)$ such that there exists a subdivision $[0=t_0,t_1,...,t_n=1]$ such that $c[t_i,t_{i+1}]subset tilde U_i$ and one sets:



        $D(tilde x)=tilde g_0...g_{n-1}tildephi_n(tilde x)$ where $g_iin G$ such that $tilde phi_icirc{tildephi_{i+1}}^{-1}$ is the restriction of $g_i$ to $tildephi_{i+1}(tilde U_{i+1})$.



        This shows that if we set $U_n=p(tilde U_n)$, we can define the chart $(U_n,g_0...g_{n-1}phi_n)$ of $x$ and the chart $(tilde U_n,g_0...g_{n-1}tilde phi_n)$ which answer your question.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        The best way to see this is to read the proof of the existence of the developing map.
        The $(X,G)$ structure on $M$ induces an $(X,G)$-structure on $tilde M$ its universal cover such that for any $tilde xin tilde M$, write $x=p(tilde x)$ where $p$ is the covering map. Consider a chart $xin U$ such that there exists $tilde U$ which contains $tilde x$ such that the restriction of $p$ to $tilde U$, $p_{tilde U}:tilde Urightarrow U$ is an homeomorphism $phi_{tilde U}=phi_Ucirc p_{tilde U}$.



        To construct the developing map, one fixes $tilde x_0in tilde M$ for every $tilde xin hat M$, one considers a path $c:[0,1]rightarrow hat M$ such that $c(0)=tilde x_0$ and $c(1)=tilde x$, then one consider chart $(tilde U_0,tilde phi_0),...(tilde U_n,tildephi_n)$ such that there exists a subdivision $[0=t_0,t_1,...,t_n=1]$ such that $c[t_i,t_{i+1}]subset tilde U_i$ and one sets:



        $D(tilde x)=tilde g_0...g_{n-1}tildephi_n(tilde x)$ where $g_iin G$ such that $tilde phi_icirc{tildephi_{i+1}}^{-1}$ is the restriction of $g_i$ to $tildephi_{i+1}(tilde U_{i+1})$.



        This shows that if we set $U_n=p(tilde U_n)$, we can define the chart $(U_n,g_0...g_{n-1}phi_n)$ of $x$ and the chart $(tilde U_n,g_0...g_{n-1}tilde phi_n)$ which answer your question.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited 4 hours ago

























        answered 4 hours ago









        Tsemo AristideTsemo Aristide

        2,6621616




        2,6621616






















            user135350 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            user135350 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













            user135350 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            user135350 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















            Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f322330%2fa-question-concerning-the-developing-map-of-g-x-manifolds%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            Сан-Квентин

            Image
            Сан-Квентин Местоположение Сан-Квентин, Калифорния Координаты 37°56′13″ с. ш. 122°29′20″ з. д. H G Я O L Текущий статус Действует Режим безопасности минимальный и максимальный Количество мест 3 302 Открытие Июнь 1852 Находится в ведомстве California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Начальник Mike Martel, начальник  Сан-Квентин на Викискладе Сан-Квентин (англ.  San Quentin ) — тюрьма, располагающаяся на 432 акрах (около 1,7 км²), на мысе Сан-Квентин, в округе Марин, штат Калифорния, США. Тюрьма штата Калифорния Сан-Квентин была открыта в июле 1852 года и является старейшей в штате. Она была построена заключёнными, которые проживали в течение строительства на тюремном судне Вабан. В Сан-Квентине отбывали наказание и мужчины, и женщины до 1934 года, когда построили женскую тюрьму в Техачапи и туда перевели всех заключённых женщин. В Сан-Квентине приводятся в исполнение смертные казни, для этого имеется газовая камера, но...
            Read more

            8-я гвардейская общевойсковая армия

            Image
            8-я гвардейская общевойсковая ордена Ленина армия Награды: Войска: РККА → Советская армия → СВ России Род войск: Формирование: 1943 Расформирование (преобразование): 1992 Предшественник: 62-я армия (1942—43) → 8-я гвардейская общевойсковая армия (1943—92) → 8-й гвардейский армейский корпус (1992—98) Боевой путь Изюм-Барвенковская операция Донбасская операция Запорожская операция Битва за Днепр Днепропетровская операция Березнеговато-Снигирёвская операция Одесская операция Люблин-Брестская операция Варшавско-Познанская операция Восточно-Померанская операция Берлинская наступательная операция У этого термина существуют и другие значения, см. 8-я армия. Фотография Гвардейского Красного Знамени (лицевая сторона) 8-й гвардейской армии , образца 1943 года. Фотография Гвардейского Красного Знамени (оборотная сторона) 8-й гвардейской армии , образца 1943 года. 8-я гвардейская общевойсковая ордена Ленина армия  — гвардейское фор...
            Read more

            Алькесар

            Image
            Муниципалитет Алькесар Alquézar Герб 42°10′16″ с. ш. 0°01′27″ в. д. H G Я O L Страна Испания   Испания Автономное сообщество Арагон Провинция Уэска Комарка Сомонтано-де-Барбастро Алькальд Хосе Марияно Альтемир Ласкорс (ИСРП) История и география Площадь 32,36 км² Высота НУМ 660 м Часовой пояс UTC+1, летом UTC+2 Население Население 313 человек ( 2010 ) Плотность 9,92 чел./км² Этнохороним alquezarano/-a Цифровые идентификаторы Телефонный код +34 974 Почтовые индексы 22112 Автомобильный код HU alquezar.org   (исп.) Показать/скрыть карты Алькесар Алькесар Алькесар  Аудио, фото и видео на Викискладе Алькесар (исп.  Alquézar ) — муниципалитет в Испании, входит в провинцию Уэска, в составе автономного сообщества Арагон. Муниципалитет находится в составе района (комарки) Сомонтано-де-Барбастро. Занимает площадь 32,36 км². Население — 321 челове...
            Read more