A question concerning the developing map of (G,X) manifolds
$begingroup$
Let $M$ be a $(G,X)$ manifold, that is we have local charts $(U,varphi_U)$ on $M$ with $varphi_U$ a diffeomorphism onto an open subset of $X$ and the transition maps are locally-$G$.
Let $mathfrak{p}:widetilde{M}rightarrow M$ be the universal covering of $M$.
The developing map theorem introduces a local diffeomorphism $dev:widetilde{M}rightarrow X$.
Does the developing map locally commute with the (restricted) covering and local charts, i.e. for $widetilde{U}$ (small enough) $dev|_widetilde{U}=varphi_{U}circmathfrak{p}|_widetilde{U}$ for some $varphi_U$?
dg.differential-geometry
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $M$ be a $(G,X)$ manifold, that is we have local charts $(U,varphi_U)$ on $M$ with $varphi_U$ a diffeomorphism onto an open subset of $X$ and the transition maps are locally-$G$.
Let $mathfrak{p}:widetilde{M}rightarrow M$ be the universal covering of $M$.
The developing map theorem introduces a local diffeomorphism $dev:widetilde{M}rightarrow X$.
Does the developing map locally commute with the (restricted) covering and local charts, i.e. for $widetilde{U}$ (small enough) $dev|_widetilde{U}=varphi_{U}circmathfrak{p}|_widetilde{U}$ for some $varphi_U$?
dg.differential-geometry
New contributor
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
It's hard to make sense of the question (the last sentence). What's "small enough $tilde{U}$"? what's "for some $varphi_U$" when $varphi_U$ is already introduced?
$endgroup$
– YCor
4 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $M$ be a $(G,X)$ manifold, that is we have local charts $(U,varphi_U)$ on $M$ with $varphi_U$ a diffeomorphism onto an open subset of $X$ and the transition maps are locally-$G$.
Let $mathfrak{p}:widetilde{M}rightarrow M$ be the universal covering of $M$.
The developing map theorem introduces a local diffeomorphism $dev:widetilde{M}rightarrow X$.
Does the developing map locally commute with the (restricted) covering and local charts, i.e. for $widetilde{U}$ (small enough) $dev|_widetilde{U}=varphi_{U}circmathfrak{p}|_widetilde{U}$ for some $varphi_U$?
dg.differential-geometry
New contributor
$endgroup$
Let $M$ be a $(G,X)$ manifold, that is we have local charts $(U,varphi_U)$ on $M$ with $varphi_U$ a diffeomorphism onto an open subset of $X$ and the transition maps are locally-$G$.
Let $mathfrak{p}:widetilde{M}rightarrow M$ be the universal covering of $M$.
The developing map theorem introduces a local diffeomorphism $dev:widetilde{M}rightarrow X$.
Does the developing map locally commute with the (restricted) covering and local charts, i.e. for $widetilde{U}$ (small enough) $dev|_widetilde{U}=varphi_{U}circmathfrak{p}|_widetilde{U}$ for some $varphi_U$?
dg.differential-geometry
dg.differential-geometry
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 4 hours ago
user135350user135350
111
111
New contributor
New contributor
1
$begingroup$
It's hard to make sense of the question (the last sentence). What's "small enough $tilde{U}$"? what's "for some $varphi_U$" when $varphi_U$ is already introduced?
$endgroup$
– YCor
4 hours ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
It's hard to make sense of the question (the last sentence). What's "small enough $tilde{U}$"? what's "for some $varphi_U$" when $varphi_U$ is already introduced?
$endgroup$
– YCor
4 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
It's hard to make sense of the question (the last sentence). What's "small enough $tilde{U}$"? what's "for some $varphi_U$" when $varphi_U$ is already introduced?
$endgroup$
– YCor
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
It's hard to make sense of the question (the last sentence). What's "small enough $tilde{U}$"? what's "for some $varphi_U$" when $varphi_U$ is already introduced?
$endgroup$
– YCor
4 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The best way to see this is to read the proof of the existence of the developing map.
The $(X,G)$ structure on $M$ induces an $(X,G)$-structure on $tilde M$ its universal cover such that for any $tilde xin tilde M$, write $x=p(tilde x)$ where $p$ is the covering map. Consider a chart $xin U$ such that there exists $tilde U$ which contains $tilde x$ such that the restriction of $p$ to $tilde U$, $p_{tilde U}:tilde Urightarrow U$ is an homeomorphism $phi_{tilde U}=phi_Ucirc p_{tilde U}$.
To construct the developing map, one fixes $tilde x_0in tilde M$ for every $tilde xin hat M$, one considers a path $c:[0,1]rightarrow hat M$ such that $c(0)=tilde x_0$ and $c(1)=tilde x$, then one consider chart $(tilde U_0,tilde phi_0),...(tilde U_n,tildephi_n)$ such that there exists a subdivision $[0=t_0,t_1,...,t_n=1]$ such that $c[t_i,t_{i+1}]subset tilde U_i$ and one sets:
$D(tilde x)=tilde g_0...g_{n-1}tildephi_n(tilde x)$ where $g_iin G$ such that $tilde phi_icirc{tildephi_{i+1}}^{-1}$ is the restriction of $g_i$ to $tildephi_{i+1}(tilde U_{i+1})$.
This shows that if we set $U_n=p(tilde U_n)$, we can define the chart $(U_n,g_0...g_{n-1}phi_n)$ of $x$ and the chart $(tilde U_n,g_0...g_{n-1}tilde phi_n)$ which answer your question.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "504"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
user135350 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f322330%2fa-question-concerning-the-developing-map-of-g-x-manifolds%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The best way to see this is to read the proof of the existence of the developing map.
The $(X,G)$ structure on $M$ induces an $(X,G)$-structure on $tilde M$ its universal cover such that for any $tilde xin tilde M$, write $x=p(tilde x)$ where $p$ is the covering map. Consider a chart $xin U$ such that there exists $tilde U$ which contains $tilde x$ such that the restriction of $p$ to $tilde U$, $p_{tilde U}:tilde Urightarrow U$ is an homeomorphism $phi_{tilde U}=phi_Ucirc p_{tilde U}$.
To construct the developing map, one fixes $tilde x_0in tilde M$ for every $tilde xin hat M$, one considers a path $c:[0,1]rightarrow hat M$ such that $c(0)=tilde x_0$ and $c(1)=tilde x$, then one consider chart $(tilde U_0,tilde phi_0),...(tilde U_n,tildephi_n)$ such that there exists a subdivision $[0=t_0,t_1,...,t_n=1]$ such that $c[t_i,t_{i+1}]subset tilde U_i$ and one sets:
$D(tilde x)=tilde g_0...g_{n-1}tildephi_n(tilde x)$ where $g_iin G$ such that $tilde phi_icirc{tildephi_{i+1}}^{-1}$ is the restriction of $g_i$ to $tildephi_{i+1}(tilde U_{i+1})$.
This shows that if we set $U_n=p(tilde U_n)$, we can define the chart $(U_n,g_0...g_{n-1}phi_n)$ of $x$ and the chart $(tilde U_n,g_0...g_{n-1}tilde phi_n)$ which answer your question.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The best way to see this is to read the proof of the existence of the developing map.
The $(X,G)$ structure on $M$ induces an $(X,G)$-structure on $tilde M$ its universal cover such that for any $tilde xin tilde M$, write $x=p(tilde x)$ where $p$ is the covering map. Consider a chart $xin U$ such that there exists $tilde U$ which contains $tilde x$ such that the restriction of $p$ to $tilde U$, $p_{tilde U}:tilde Urightarrow U$ is an homeomorphism $phi_{tilde U}=phi_Ucirc p_{tilde U}$.
To construct the developing map, one fixes $tilde x_0in tilde M$ for every $tilde xin hat M$, one considers a path $c:[0,1]rightarrow hat M$ such that $c(0)=tilde x_0$ and $c(1)=tilde x$, then one consider chart $(tilde U_0,tilde phi_0),...(tilde U_n,tildephi_n)$ such that there exists a subdivision $[0=t_0,t_1,...,t_n=1]$ such that $c[t_i,t_{i+1}]subset tilde U_i$ and one sets:
$D(tilde x)=tilde g_0...g_{n-1}tildephi_n(tilde x)$ where $g_iin G$ such that $tilde phi_icirc{tildephi_{i+1}}^{-1}$ is the restriction of $g_i$ to $tildephi_{i+1}(tilde U_{i+1})$.
This shows that if we set $U_n=p(tilde U_n)$, we can define the chart $(U_n,g_0...g_{n-1}phi_n)$ of $x$ and the chart $(tilde U_n,g_0...g_{n-1}tilde phi_n)$ which answer your question.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The best way to see this is to read the proof of the existence of the developing map.
The $(X,G)$ structure on $M$ induces an $(X,G)$-structure on $tilde M$ its universal cover such that for any $tilde xin tilde M$, write $x=p(tilde x)$ where $p$ is the covering map. Consider a chart $xin U$ such that there exists $tilde U$ which contains $tilde x$ such that the restriction of $p$ to $tilde U$, $p_{tilde U}:tilde Urightarrow U$ is an homeomorphism $phi_{tilde U}=phi_Ucirc p_{tilde U}$.
To construct the developing map, one fixes $tilde x_0in tilde M$ for every $tilde xin hat M$, one considers a path $c:[0,1]rightarrow hat M$ such that $c(0)=tilde x_0$ and $c(1)=tilde x$, then one consider chart $(tilde U_0,tilde phi_0),...(tilde U_n,tildephi_n)$ such that there exists a subdivision $[0=t_0,t_1,...,t_n=1]$ such that $c[t_i,t_{i+1}]subset tilde U_i$ and one sets:
$D(tilde x)=tilde g_0...g_{n-1}tildephi_n(tilde x)$ where $g_iin G$ such that $tilde phi_icirc{tildephi_{i+1}}^{-1}$ is the restriction of $g_i$ to $tildephi_{i+1}(tilde U_{i+1})$.
This shows that if we set $U_n=p(tilde U_n)$, we can define the chart $(U_n,g_0...g_{n-1}phi_n)$ of $x$ and the chart $(tilde U_n,g_0...g_{n-1}tilde phi_n)$ which answer your question.
$endgroup$
The best way to see this is to read the proof of the existence of the developing map.
The $(X,G)$ structure on $M$ induces an $(X,G)$-structure on $tilde M$ its universal cover such that for any $tilde xin tilde M$, write $x=p(tilde x)$ where $p$ is the covering map. Consider a chart $xin U$ such that there exists $tilde U$ which contains $tilde x$ such that the restriction of $p$ to $tilde U$, $p_{tilde U}:tilde Urightarrow U$ is an homeomorphism $phi_{tilde U}=phi_Ucirc p_{tilde U}$.
To construct the developing map, one fixes $tilde x_0in tilde M$ for every $tilde xin hat M$, one considers a path $c:[0,1]rightarrow hat M$ such that $c(0)=tilde x_0$ and $c(1)=tilde x$, then one consider chart $(tilde U_0,tilde phi_0),...(tilde U_n,tildephi_n)$ such that there exists a subdivision $[0=t_0,t_1,...,t_n=1]$ such that $c[t_i,t_{i+1}]subset tilde U_i$ and one sets:
$D(tilde x)=tilde g_0...g_{n-1}tildephi_n(tilde x)$ where $g_iin G$ such that $tilde phi_icirc{tildephi_{i+1}}^{-1}$ is the restriction of $g_i$ to $tildephi_{i+1}(tilde U_{i+1})$.
This shows that if we set $U_n=p(tilde U_n)$, we can define the chart $(U_n,g_0...g_{n-1}phi_n)$ of $x$ and the chart $(tilde U_n,g_0...g_{n-1}tilde phi_n)$ which answer your question.
edited 4 hours ago
answered 4 hours ago
Tsemo AristideTsemo Aristide
2,6621616
2,6621616
add a comment |
add a comment |
user135350 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
user135350 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
user135350 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
user135350 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f322330%2fa-question-concerning-the-developing-map-of-g-x-manifolds%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
It's hard to make sense of the question (the last sentence). What's "small enough $tilde{U}$"? what's "for some $varphi_U$" when $varphi_U$ is already introduced?
$endgroup$
– YCor
4 hours ago