Why is adding a loopback rule needed for internet to work when your iptables policy on INPUT is set to DROP?
I don't quite get why it's needed. Say you have the following iptables policies:
INPUT (DROP)
-m conntrack --ctstate ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
FORWARD (DROP)
None
OUTPUT (DROP)
Rules to allow 443, 80, 53
Trying to access any site with the web browser results in no success with this ruleset but if you add the rule
-i lo -j ACCEPT
to INPUT it starts working.
Basically, I want to know the architectural/design reason as to why this has to be a thing.
linux networking firewall iptables
asked Dec 3 at 7:35
Resonce
11
add a comment |
I don't quite get why it's needed. Say you have the following iptables policies:
INPUT (DROP)
-m conntrack --ctstate ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
FORWARD (DROP)
None
OUTPUT (DROP)
Rules to allow 443, 80, 53
Trying to access any site with the web browser results in no success with this ruleset but if you add the rule
-i lo -j ACCEPT
to INPUT it starts working.
Basically, I want to know the architectural/design reason as to why this has to be a thing.
linux networking firewall iptables
asked Dec 3 at 7:35
Resonce
11
1
The loopback device is for network connections between local applications (HTTP proxy, DNS proxy). If you disallow any of those with a default policy of DROP, but if your browser needs any of these, it won't work. To see what actually goes over the loopback device, run Wireshark etc. on it and have a look, then you'll know what it is that the browser requires.
– dirkt
Dec 3 at 7:49
Thank you very much for that answer. Guess I'll start digging next week XD I'll get back to you and hopefully come back with conclusive results and by then, I hope you put your comment as an answer so I can mark it as the solution.
– Resonce
Dec 5 at 3:53
It would be nice to have an answer which explains which traffic was actually going over the loopback interface in your case, which is why I just did a comment. BTW, you can also answer your own question. If you want to cut&paste snooped traffic into the question/answer, usetcpdumpinstead ofwireshark(if there's a good textual export from wireshark, I somehow missed it).
– dirkt
Dec 5 at 6:58
add a comment |
I don't quite get why it's needed. Say you have the following iptables policies:
INPUT (DROP)
-m conntrack --ctstate ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
FORWARD (DROP)
None
OUTPUT (DROP)
Rules to allow 443, 80, 53
Trying to access any site with the web browser results in no success with this ruleset but if you add the rule
-i lo -j ACCEPT
to INPUT it starts working.
Basically, I want to know the architectural/design reason as to why this has to be a thing.
linux networking firewall iptables
asked Dec 3 at 7:35
Resonce
11
I don't quite get why it's needed. Say you have the following iptables policies:
INPUT (DROP)
-m conntrack --ctstate ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
FORWARD (DROP)
None
OUTPUT (DROP)
Rules to allow 443, 80, 53
Trying to access any site with the web browser results in no success with this ruleset but if you add the rule
-i lo -j ACCEPT
to INPUT it starts working.
Basically, I want to know the architectural/design reason as to why this has to be a thing.
linux networking firewall iptables
linux networking firewall iptables
asked Dec 3 at 7:35
Resonce
11
asked Dec 3 at 7:35
Resonce
11
asked Dec 3 at 7:35
Resonce
11
asked Dec 3 at 7:35
Resonce
11
asked Dec 3 at 7:35
Resonce
11
11
1
The loopback device is for network connections between local applications (HTTP proxy, DNS proxy). If you disallow any of those with a default policy of DROP, but if your browser needs any of these, it won't work. To see what actually goes over the loopback device, run Wireshark etc. on it and have a look, then you'll know what it is that the browser requires.
– dirkt
Dec 3 at 7:49
Thank you very much for that answer. Guess I'll start digging next week XD I'll get back to you and hopefully come back with conclusive results and by then, I hope you put your comment as an answer so I can mark it as the solution.
– Resonce
Dec 5 at 3:53
It would be nice to have an answer which explains which traffic was actually going over the loopback interface in your case, which is why I just did a comment. BTW, you can also answer your own question. If you want to cut&paste snooped traffic into the question/answer, usetcpdumpinstead ofwireshark(if there's a good textual export from wireshark, I somehow missed it).
– dirkt
Dec 5 at 6:58
add a comment |
1
The loopback device is for network connections between local applications (HTTP proxy, DNS proxy). If you disallow any of those with a default policy of DROP, but if your browser needs any of these, it won't work. To see what actually goes over the loopback device, run Wireshark etc. on it and have a look, then you'll know what it is that the browser requires.
– dirkt
Dec 3 at 7:49
Thank you very much for that answer. Guess I'll start digging next week XD I'll get back to you and hopefully come back with conclusive results and by then, I hope you put your comment as an answer so I can mark it as the solution.
– Resonce
Dec 5 at 3:53
It would be nice to have an answer which explains which traffic was actually going over the loopback interface in your case, which is why I just did a comment. BTW, you can also answer your own question. If you want to cut&paste snooped traffic into the question/answer, usetcpdumpinstead ofwireshark(if there's a good textual export from wireshark, I somehow missed it).
– dirkt
Dec 5 at 6:58
1
1
The loopback device is for network connections between local applications (HTTP proxy, DNS proxy). If you disallow any of those with a default policy of DROP, but if your browser needs any of these, it won't work. To see what actually goes over the loopback device, run Wireshark etc. on it and have a look, then you'll know what it is that the browser requires.
– dirkt
Dec 3 at 7:49
The loopback device is for network connections between local applications (HTTP proxy, DNS proxy). If you disallow any of those with a default policy of DROP, but if your browser needs any of these, it won't work. To see what actually goes over the loopback device, run Wireshark etc. on it and have a look, then you'll know what it is that the browser requires.
– dirkt
Dec 3 at 7:49
Thank you very much for that answer. Guess I'll start digging next week XD I'll get back to you and hopefully come back with conclusive results and by then, I hope you put your comment as an answer so I can mark it as the solution.
– Resonce
Dec 5 at 3:53
Thank you very much for that answer. Guess I'll start digging next week XD I'll get back to you and hopefully come back with conclusive results and by then, I hope you put your comment as an answer so I can mark it as the solution.
– Resonce
Dec 5 at 3:53
It would be nice to have an answer which explains which traffic was actually going over the loopback interface in your case, which is why I just did a comment. BTW, you can also answer your own question. If you want to cut&paste snooped traffic into the question/answer, use
tcpdump instead of wireshark (if there's a good textual export from wireshark, I somehow missed it).– dirkt
Dec 5 at 6:58
It would be nice to have an answer which explains which traffic was actually going over the loopback interface in your case, which is why I just did a comment. BTW, you can also answer your own question. If you want to cut&paste snooped traffic into the question/answer, use
tcpdump instead of wireshark (if there's a good textual export from wireshark, I somehow missed it).– dirkt
Dec 5 at 6:58
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "3"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1380337%2fwhy-is-adding-a-loopback-rule-needed-for-internet-to-work-when-your-iptables-pol%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1380337%2fwhy-is-adding-a-loopback-rule-needed-for-internet-to-work-when-your-iptables-pol%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
The loopback device is for network connections between local applications (HTTP proxy, DNS proxy). If you disallow any of those with a default policy of DROP, but if your browser needs any of these, it won't work. To see what actually goes over the loopback device, run Wireshark etc. on it and have a look, then you'll know what it is that the browser requires.
– dirkt
Dec 3 at 7:49
Thank you very much for that answer. Guess I'll start digging next week XD I'll get back to you and hopefully come back with conclusive results and by then, I hope you put your comment as an answer so I can mark it as the solution.
– Resonce
Dec 5 at 3:53
It would be nice to have an answer which explains which traffic was actually going over the loopback interface in your case, which is why I just did a comment. BTW, you can also answer your own question. If you want to cut&paste snooped traffic into the question/answer, use
tcpdumpinstead ofwireshark(if there's a good textual export from wireshark, I somehow missed it).– dirkt
Dec 5 at 6:58