Map function onto nested list?












3














Q: how can I map a function onto elements of nested lists?



For flat lists, we can use mapcar to apply a function to each
element of the list:



(setq flat '("kittens" "puppies" "otters" "bunnies"))
(mapcar #'upcase flat) ; => ("KITTENS" "PUPPIES" "OTTERS" "BUNNIES")


But mapcar doesn't work on nested lists:



(setq nested '(("kittens" "puppies")
("otters" "bunnies")))
(mapcar #'upcase nested) ; => ERROR


How can I map a function onto each element of a nested list, and
get back a new list with the same structure as the old one?










share|improve this question




















  • 2




    One thing to note about recursive solutions using e.g. cl-labels or -tree-map is that Emacs doesn't handle recursion very efficiently and can easily blow the max-specpdl-size stack. So, they may be fine for personal use, but Elisp libraries should generally strive for iterative solutions with an explicit stack.
    – Basil
    Dec 19 at 13:24










  • @Basil: interesting point. Do you know of an iterative solution to avoid recursion?
    – Dan
    Dec 19 at 13:42
















3














Q: how can I map a function onto elements of nested lists?



For flat lists, we can use mapcar to apply a function to each
element of the list:



(setq flat '("kittens" "puppies" "otters" "bunnies"))
(mapcar #'upcase flat) ; => ("KITTENS" "PUPPIES" "OTTERS" "BUNNIES")


But mapcar doesn't work on nested lists:



(setq nested '(("kittens" "puppies")
("otters" "bunnies")))
(mapcar #'upcase nested) ; => ERROR


How can I map a function onto each element of a nested list, and
get back a new list with the same structure as the old one?










share|improve this question




















  • 2




    One thing to note about recursive solutions using e.g. cl-labels or -tree-map is that Emacs doesn't handle recursion very efficiently and can easily blow the max-specpdl-size stack. So, they may be fine for personal use, but Elisp libraries should generally strive for iterative solutions with an explicit stack.
    – Basil
    Dec 19 at 13:24










  • @Basil: interesting point. Do you know of an iterative solution to avoid recursion?
    – Dan
    Dec 19 at 13:42














3












3








3







Q: how can I map a function onto elements of nested lists?



For flat lists, we can use mapcar to apply a function to each
element of the list:



(setq flat '("kittens" "puppies" "otters" "bunnies"))
(mapcar #'upcase flat) ; => ("KITTENS" "PUPPIES" "OTTERS" "BUNNIES")


But mapcar doesn't work on nested lists:



(setq nested '(("kittens" "puppies")
("otters" "bunnies")))
(mapcar #'upcase nested) ; => ERROR


How can I map a function onto each element of a nested list, and
get back a new list with the same structure as the old one?










share|improve this question















Q: how can I map a function onto elements of nested lists?



For flat lists, we can use mapcar to apply a function to each
element of the list:



(setq flat '("kittens" "puppies" "otters" "bunnies"))
(mapcar #'upcase flat) ; => ("KITTENS" "PUPPIES" "OTTERS" "BUNNIES")


But mapcar doesn't work on nested lists:



(setq nested '(("kittens" "puppies")
("otters" "bunnies")))
(mapcar #'upcase nested) ; => ERROR


How can I map a function onto each element of a nested list, and
get back a new list with the same structure as the old one?







list mapping






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Dec 19 at 18:51









Drew

46.9k462104




46.9k462104










asked Dec 19 at 12:13









Dan

20.6k547107




20.6k547107








  • 2




    One thing to note about recursive solutions using e.g. cl-labels or -tree-map is that Emacs doesn't handle recursion very efficiently and can easily blow the max-specpdl-size stack. So, they may be fine for personal use, but Elisp libraries should generally strive for iterative solutions with an explicit stack.
    – Basil
    Dec 19 at 13:24










  • @Basil: interesting point. Do you know of an iterative solution to avoid recursion?
    – Dan
    Dec 19 at 13:42














  • 2




    One thing to note about recursive solutions using e.g. cl-labels or -tree-map is that Emacs doesn't handle recursion very efficiently and can easily blow the max-specpdl-size stack. So, they may be fine for personal use, but Elisp libraries should generally strive for iterative solutions with an explicit stack.
    – Basil
    Dec 19 at 13:24










  • @Basil: interesting point. Do you know of an iterative solution to avoid recursion?
    – Dan
    Dec 19 at 13:42








2




2




One thing to note about recursive solutions using e.g. cl-labels or -tree-map is that Emacs doesn't handle recursion very efficiently and can easily blow the max-specpdl-size stack. So, they may be fine for personal use, but Elisp libraries should generally strive for iterative solutions with an explicit stack.
– Basil
Dec 19 at 13:24




One thing to note about recursive solutions using e.g. cl-labels or -tree-map is that Emacs doesn't handle recursion very efficiently and can easily blow the max-specpdl-size stack. So, they may be fine for personal use, but Elisp libraries should generally strive for iterative solutions with an explicit stack.
– Basil
Dec 19 at 13:24












@Basil: interesting point. Do you know of an iterative solution to avoid recursion?
– Dan
Dec 19 at 13:42




@Basil: interesting point. Do you know of an iterative solution to avoid recursion?
– Dan
Dec 19 at 13:42










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















4














You want to apply the solution recursively. For example:



(cl-labels ((upcase-nested
(x)
(cond ((consp x) (mapcar #'upcase-nested x))
((stringp x) (upcase x))
(t x))))
(mapcar #'upcase-nested
'(("kittens" ("spam") "puppies")
("otters" "bunnies" ("spam" ("spam" ("spam" ("spam" "and" "spam")))) "gnu"))))

=> (("KITTENS" ("SPAM") "PUPPIES")
("OTTERS" "BUNNIES" ("SPAM" ("SPAM" ("SPAM" ("SPAM" "AND" "SPAM")))) "GNU"))





share|improve this answer





















  • Thank you! I benchmarked this solution and the -tree-map answer that @Tobias posted. It turns out this solution runs about twice as quickly as -tree-map.
    – Dan
    Dec 19 at 13:40



















3














The function -tree-map from the dash package does that:



(-tree-map #'upcase '(("kittens" "puppies")
("otters" "bunnies")))

(("KITTENS" "PUPPIES") ("OTTERS" "BUNNIES"))





share|improve this answer





















  • Great! Thank you. The advantage of this option is that it's a simple function call. The (minor) disadvantage is that it requires the use of a non-built in package. The bigger disadvantage is that it turns out that it's about twice as slow as the answer @phils posted, which is why I accepted that one over this one.
    – Dan
    Dec 19 at 13:40



















1














Following up Basils comment on the problems with recursive solutions I give here an iterative solution.



It exploits a breadth first search and therefore needs a queue. My first attempt with a depths-first search caused me some trouble with creating the structure and setting the values of the return tree.



The queue impl comes with the answer but you can also use other libraries like elib for that purpose.



The tree argument of map-tree-iter must be a list. Atoms and dotted lists are not allowed.



Note that I did not care about execution speed for this proof of concept implementation.



(defun make-queue (&rest elements)
"Return queue structure.
A queue is a cons.
Its `cdr' is the actual data list and its `car' contains the last link
of the data list for fast tail update.
If (cdr QUEUE) is nil so is (car QUEUE)."
(cons (last elements) elements))

(defun queue-push-back (queue &rest new-elements)
"Append NEW-ELEMENT to QUEUE."
(if (car queue)
(setcar queue
(last (setcdr (car queue) new-elements)))
(setcar queue (last (setcdr queue new-elements)))))

(defmacro queue-front (queue)
"Return first element of QUEUE.
The returned value is a place setable with setf."
`(cadr ,queue))

(defmacro queue-pop-front (queue)
"Pop the first element of QUEUE.
The return value is nil if there is no first element."
`(prog1
(pop (cdr ,queue))
(unless (cdr ,queue)
(setcar ,queue nil))))

(define-inline queue-not-empty-p (queue)
"Return non-nil if QUEUE is not empty."
(inline-letevals
(queue)
(inline-quote (car ,queue))))

(define-inline queue-to-list (queue)
"Convert QUEUE to a list.
Note that QUEUE and the returned list
share content and structure.
If you want to modify the structure of the returned list
you should consider (copy-list (queue-to-list QUEUE))."
(inline-letevals (queue)
(inline-quote (cdr ,queue))))

(defun queue-empty-p (queue)
"Return non-nil if QUEUE is empty."
(null (queue-not-empty-p queue)))

(defun map-tree-iter (fun tree)
"Map FUN over TREE."
(let* ((queue (make-queue tree))
(ret (list nil))
(queue-ret (make-queue ret)))
(while (queue-not-empty-p queue)
(let ((front (queue-pop-front queue))
(front-ret (queue-pop-front queue-ret)))
(while front
(cond
((consp (car front))
(queue-push-back queue (car front))
(let ((list-ret (list nil)))
(queue-push-back queue-ret list-ret)
(setcar front-ret list-ret)))
((car front)
(setcar front-ret (funcall fun (car front))))
)
(setq front (cdr front))
(when front
(setcdr front-ret (list nil))
(setq front-ret (cdr front-ret))))))
ret))





share|improve this answer























  • "Note that I did not care about execution speed" and yet you are using define-inline and defmacro. :)
    – Basil
    2 days ago





















0














Since you have a list of lists, you have to mapcar over mapcar:



(defun mapmap (f lol)
(mapcar (lambda (l) (mapcar f l)) lol))

(mapmap #'upcase nested)
;; => (("KITTENS" "PUPPIES") ("OTTERS" "BUNNIES"))





share|improve this answer

















  • 2




    That only works for the rigid structure of a list of lists. The expression nested list actually stands for a tree structure. Your approach does not work for a more complicated tree.
    – Tobias
    Dec 19 at 21:02













Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "583"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2femacs.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f46680%2fmap-function-onto-nested-list%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes








4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









4














You want to apply the solution recursively. For example:



(cl-labels ((upcase-nested
(x)
(cond ((consp x) (mapcar #'upcase-nested x))
((stringp x) (upcase x))
(t x))))
(mapcar #'upcase-nested
'(("kittens" ("spam") "puppies")
("otters" "bunnies" ("spam" ("spam" ("spam" ("spam" "and" "spam")))) "gnu"))))

=> (("KITTENS" ("SPAM") "PUPPIES")
("OTTERS" "BUNNIES" ("SPAM" ("SPAM" ("SPAM" ("SPAM" "AND" "SPAM")))) "GNU"))





share|improve this answer





















  • Thank you! I benchmarked this solution and the -tree-map answer that @Tobias posted. It turns out this solution runs about twice as quickly as -tree-map.
    – Dan
    Dec 19 at 13:40
















4














You want to apply the solution recursively. For example:



(cl-labels ((upcase-nested
(x)
(cond ((consp x) (mapcar #'upcase-nested x))
((stringp x) (upcase x))
(t x))))
(mapcar #'upcase-nested
'(("kittens" ("spam") "puppies")
("otters" "bunnies" ("spam" ("spam" ("spam" ("spam" "and" "spam")))) "gnu"))))

=> (("KITTENS" ("SPAM") "PUPPIES")
("OTTERS" "BUNNIES" ("SPAM" ("SPAM" ("SPAM" ("SPAM" "AND" "SPAM")))) "GNU"))





share|improve this answer





















  • Thank you! I benchmarked this solution and the -tree-map answer that @Tobias posted. It turns out this solution runs about twice as quickly as -tree-map.
    – Dan
    Dec 19 at 13:40














4












4








4






You want to apply the solution recursively. For example:



(cl-labels ((upcase-nested
(x)
(cond ((consp x) (mapcar #'upcase-nested x))
((stringp x) (upcase x))
(t x))))
(mapcar #'upcase-nested
'(("kittens" ("spam") "puppies")
("otters" "bunnies" ("spam" ("spam" ("spam" ("spam" "and" "spam")))) "gnu"))))

=> (("KITTENS" ("SPAM") "PUPPIES")
("OTTERS" "BUNNIES" ("SPAM" ("SPAM" ("SPAM" ("SPAM" "AND" "SPAM")))) "GNU"))





share|improve this answer












You want to apply the solution recursively. For example:



(cl-labels ((upcase-nested
(x)
(cond ((consp x) (mapcar #'upcase-nested x))
((stringp x) (upcase x))
(t x))))
(mapcar #'upcase-nested
'(("kittens" ("spam") "puppies")
("otters" "bunnies" ("spam" ("spam" ("spam" ("spam" "and" "spam")))) "gnu"))))

=> (("KITTENS" ("SPAM") "PUPPIES")
("OTTERS" "BUNNIES" ("SPAM" ("SPAM" ("SPAM" ("SPAM" "AND" "SPAM")))) "GNU"))






share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Dec 19 at 12:40









phils

25.8k23565




25.8k23565












  • Thank you! I benchmarked this solution and the -tree-map answer that @Tobias posted. It turns out this solution runs about twice as quickly as -tree-map.
    – Dan
    Dec 19 at 13:40


















  • Thank you! I benchmarked this solution and the -tree-map answer that @Tobias posted. It turns out this solution runs about twice as quickly as -tree-map.
    – Dan
    Dec 19 at 13:40
















Thank you! I benchmarked this solution and the -tree-map answer that @Tobias posted. It turns out this solution runs about twice as quickly as -tree-map.
– Dan
Dec 19 at 13:40




Thank you! I benchmarked this solution and the -tree-map answer that @Tobias posted. It turns out this solution runs about twice as quickly as -tree-map.
– Dan
Dec 19 at 13:40











3














The function -tree-map from the dash package does that:



(-tree-map #'upcase '(("kittens" "puppies")
("otters" "bunnies")))

(("KITTENS" "PUPPIES") ("OTTERS" "BUNNIES"))





share|improve this answer





















  • Great! Thank you. The advantage of this option is that it's a simple function call. The (minor) disadvantage is that it requires the use of a non-built in package. The bigger disadvantage is that it turns out that it's about twice as slow as the answer @phils posted, which is why I accepted that one over this one.
    – Dan
    Dec 19 at 13:40
















3














The function -tree-map from the dash package does that:



(-tree-map #'upcase '(("kittens" "puppies")
("otters" "bunnies")))

(("KITTENS" "PUPPIES") ("OTTERS" "BUNNIES"))





share|improve this answer





















  • Great! Thank you. The advantage of this option is that it's a simple function call. The (minor) disadvantage is that it requires the use of a non-built in package. The bigger disadvantage is that it turns out that it's about twice as slow as the answer @phils posted, which is why I accepted that one over this one.
    – Dan
    Dec 19 at 13:40














3












3








3






The function -tree-map from the dash package does that:



(-tree-map #'upcase '(("kittens" "puppies")
("otters" "bunnies")))

(("KITTENS" "PUPPIES") ("OTTERS" "BUNNIES"))





share|improve this answer












The function -tree-map from the dash package does that:



(-tree-map #'upcase '(("kittens" "puppies")
("otters" "bunnies")))

(("KITTENS" "PUPPIES") ("OTTERS" "BUNNIES"))






share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Dec 19 at 12:42









Tobias

12.6k1833




12.6k1833












  • Great! Thank you. The advantage of this option is that it's a simple function call. The (minor) disadvantage is that it requires the use of a non-built in package. The bigger disadvantage is that it turns out that it's about twice as slow as the answer @phils posted, which is why I accepted that one over this one.
    – Dan
    Dec 19 at 13:40


















  • Great! Thank you. The advantage of this option is that it's a simple function call. The (minor) disadvantage is that it requires the use of a non-built in package. The bigger disadvantage is that it turns out that it's about twice as slow as the answer @phils posted, which is why I accepted that one over this one.
    – Dan
    Dec 19 at 13:40
















Great! Thank you. The advantage of this option is that it's a simple function call. The (minor) disadvantage is that it requires the use of a non-built in package. The bigger disadvantage is that it turns out that it's about twice as slow as the answer @phils posted, which is why I accepted that one over this one.
– Dan
Dec 19 at 13:40




Great! Thank you. The advantage of this option is that it's a simple function call. The (minor) disadvantage is that it requires the use of a non-built in package. The bigger disadvantage is that it turns out that it's about twice as slow as the answer @phils posted, which is why I accepted that one over this one.
– Dan
Dec 19 at 13:40











1














Following up Basils comment on the problems with recursive solutions I give here an iterative solution.



It exploits a breadth first search and therefore needs a queue. My first attempt with a depths-first search caused me some trouble with creating the structure and setting the values of the return tree.



The queue impl comes with the answer but you can also use other libraries like elib for that purpose.



The tree argument of map-tree-iter must be a list. Atoms and dotted lists are not allowed.



Note that I did not care about execution speed for this proof of concept implementation.



(defun make-queue (&rest elements)
"Return queue structure.
A queue is a cons.
Its `cdr' is the actual data list and its `car' contains the last link
of the data list for fast tail update.
If (cdr QUEUE) is nil so is (car QUEUE)."
(cons (last elements) elements))

(defun queue-push-back (queue &rest new-elements)
"Append NEW-ELEMENT to QUEUE."
(if (car queue)
(setcar queue
(last (setcdr (car queue) new-elements)))
(setcar queue (last (setcdr queue new-elements)))))

(defmacro queue-front (queue)
"Return first element of QUEUE.
The returned value is a place setable with setf."
`(cadr ,queue))

(defmacro queue-pop-front (queue)
"Pop the first element of QUEUE.
The return value is nil if there is no first element."
`(prog1
(pop (cdr ,queue))
(unless (cdr ,queue)
(setcar ,queue nil))))

(define-inline queue-not-empty-p (queue)
"Return non-nil if QUEUE is not empty."
(inline-letevals
(queue)
(inline-quote (car ,queue))))

(define-inline queue-to-list (queue)
"Convert QUEUE to a list.
Note that QUEUE and the returned list
share content and structure.
If you want to modify the structure of the returned list
you should consider (copy-list (queue-to-list QUEUE))."
(inline-letevals (queue)
(inline-quote (cdr ,queue))))

(defun queue-empty-p (queue)
"Return non-nil if QUEUE is empty."
(null (queue-not-empty-p queue)))

(defun map-tree-iter (fun tree)
"Map FUN over TREE."
(let* ((queue (make-queue tree))
(ret (list nil))
(queue-ret (make-queue ret)))
(while (queue-not-empty-p queue)
(let ((front (queue-pop-front queue))
(front-ret (queue-pop-front queue-ret)))
(while front
(cond
((consp (car front))
(queue-push-back queue (car front))
(let ((list-ret (list nil)))
(queue-push-back queue-ret list-ret)
(setcar front-ret list-ret)))
((car front)
(setcar front-ret (funcall fun (car front))))
)
(setq front (cdr front))
(when front
(setcdr front-ret (list nil))
(setq front-ret (cdr front-ret))))))
ret))





share|improve this answer























  • "Note that I did not care about execution speed" and yet you are using define-inline and defmacro. :)
    – Basil
    2 days ago


















1














Following up Basils comment on the problems with recursive solutions I give here an iterative solution.



It exploits a breadth first search and therefore needs a queue. My first attempt with a depths-first search caused me some trouble with creating the structure and setting the values of the return tree.



The queue impl comes with the answer but you can also use other libraries like elib for that purpose.



The tree argument of map-tree-iter must be a list. Atoms and dotted lists are not allowed.



Note that I did not care about execution speed for this proof of concept implementation.



(defun make-queue (&rest elements)
"Return queue structure.
A queue is a cons.
Its `cdr' is the actual data list and its `car' contains the last link
of the data list for fast tail update.
If (cdr QUEUE) is nil so is (car QUEUE)."
(cons (last elements) elements))

(defun queue-push-back (queue &rest new-elements)
"Append NEW-ELEMENT to QUEUE."
(if (car queue)
(setcar queue
(last (setcdr (car queue) new-elements)))
(setcar queue (last (setcdr queue new-elements)))))

(defmacro queue-front (queue)
"Return first element of QUEUE.
The returned value is a place setable with setf."
`(cadr ,queue))

(defmacro queue-pop-front (queue)
"Pop the first element of QUEUE.
The return value is nil if there is no first element."
`(prog1
(pop (cdr ,queue))
(unless (cdr ,queue)
(setcar ,queue nil))))

(define-inline queue-not-empty-p (queue)
"Return non-nil if QUEUE is not empty."
(inline-letevals
(queue)
(inline-quote (car ,queue))))

(define-inline queue-to-list (queue)
"Convert QUEUE to a list.
Note that QUEUE and the returned list
share content and structure.
If you want to modify the structure of the returned list
you should consider (copy-list (queue-to-list QUEUE))."
(inline-letevals (queue)
(inline-quote (cdr ,queue))))

(defun queue-empty-p (queue)
"Return non-nil if QUEUE is empty."
(null (queue-not-empty-p queue)))

(defun map-tree-iter (fun tree)
"Map FUN over TREE."
(let* ((queue (make-queue tree))
(ret (list nil))
(queue-ret (make-queue ret)))
(while (queue-not-empty-p queue)
(let ((front (queue-pop-front queue))
(front-ret (queue-pop-front queue-ret)))
(while front
(cond
((consp (car front))
(queue-push-back queue (car front))
(let ((list-ret (list nil)))
(queue-push-back queue-ret list-ret)
(setcar front-ret list-ret)))
((car front)
(setcar front-ret (funcall fun (car front))))
)
(setq front (cdr front))
(when front
(setcdr front-ret (list nil))
(setq front-ret (cdr front-ret))))))
ret))





share|improve this answer























  • "Note that I did not care about execution speed" and yet you are using define-inline and defmacro. :)
    – Basil
    2 days ago
















1












1








1






Following up Basils comment on the problems with recursive solutions I give here an iterative solution.



It exploits a breadth first search and therefore needs a queue. My first attempt with a depths-first search caused me some trouble with creating the structure and setting the values of the return tree.



The queue impl comes with the answer but you can also use other libraries like elib for that purpose.



The tree argument of map-tree-iter must be a list. Atoms and dotted lists are not allowed.



Note that I did not care about execution speed for this proof of concept implementation.



(defun make-queue (&rest elements)
"Return queue structure.
A queue is a cons.
Its `cdr' is the actual data list and its `car' contains the last link
of the data list for fast tail update.
If (cdr QUEUE) is nil so is (car QUEUE)."
(cons (last elements) elements))

(defun queue-push-back (queue &rest new-elements)
"Append NEW-ELEMENT to QUEUE."
(if (car queue)
(setcar queue
(last (setcdr (car queue) new-elements)))
(setcar queue (last (setcdr queue new-elements)))))

(defmacro queue-front (queue)
"Return first element of QUEUE.
The returned value is a place setable with setf."
`(cadr ,queue))

(defmacro queue-pop-front (queue)
"Pop the first element of QUEUE.
The return value is nil if there is no first element."
`(prog1
(pop (cdr ,queue))
(unless (cdr ,queue)
(setcar ,queue nil))))

(define-inline queue-not-empty-p (queue)
"Return non-nil if QUEUE is not empty."
(inline-letevals
(queue)
(inline-quote (car ,queue))))

(define-inline queue-to-list (queue)
"Convert QUEUE to a list.
Note that QUEUE and the returned list
share content and structure.
If you want to modify the structure of the returned list
you should consider (copy-list (queue-to-list QUEUE))."
(inline-letevals (queue)
(inline-quote (cdr ,queue))))

(defun queue-empty-p (queue)
"Return non-nil if QUEUE is empty."
(null (queue-not-empty-p queue)))

(defun map-tree-iter (fun tree)
"Map FUN over TREE."
(let* ((queue (make-queue tree))
(ret (list nil))
(queue-ret (make-queue ret)))
(while (queue-not-empty-p queue)
(let ((front (queue-pop-front queue))
(front-ret (queue-pop-front queue-ret)))
(while front
(cond
((consp (car front))
(queue-push-back queue (car front))
(let ((list-ret (list nil)))
(queue-push-back queue-ret list-ret)
(setcar front-ret list-ret)))
((car front)
(setcar front-ret (funcall fun (car front))))
)
(setq front (cdr front))
(when front
(setcdr front-ret (list nil))
(setq front-ret (cdr front-ret))))))
ret))





share|improve this answer














Following up Basils comment on the problems with recursive solutions I give here an iterative solution.



It exploits a breadth first search and therefore needs a queue. My first attempt with a depths-first search caused me some trouble with creating the structure and setting the values of the return tree.



The queue impl comes with the answer but you can also use other libraries like elib for that purpose.



The tree argument of map-tree-iter must be a list. Atoms and dotted lists are not allowed.



Note that I did not care about execution speed for this proof of concept implementation.



(defun make-queue (&rest elements)
"Return queue structure.
A queue is a cons.
Its `cdr' is the actual data list and its `car' contains the last link
of the data list for fast tail update.
If (cdr QUEUE) is nil so is (car QUEUE)."
(cons (last elements) elements))

(defun queue-push-back (queue &rest new-elements)
"Append NEW-ELEMENT to QUEUE."
(if (car queue)
(setcar queue
(last (setcdr (car queue) new-elements)))
(setcar queue (last (setcdr queue new-elements)))))

(defmacro queue-front (queue)
"Return first element of QUEUE.
The returned value is a place setable with setf."
`(cadr ,queue))

(defmacro queue-pop-front (queue)
"Pop the first element of QUEUE.
The return value is nil if there is no first element."
`(prog1
(pop (cdr ,queue))
(unless (cdr ,queue)
(setcar ,queue nil))))

(define-inline queue-not-empty-p (queue)
"Return non-nil if QUEUE is not empty."
(inline-letevals
(queue)
(inline-quote (car ,queue))))

(define-inline queue-to-list (queue)
"Convert QUEUE to a list.
Note that QUEUE and the returned list
share content and structure.
If you want to modify the structure of the returned list
you should consider (copy-list (queue-to-list QUEUE))."
(inline-letevals (queue)
(inline-quote (cdr ,queue))))

(defun queue-empty-p (queue)
"Return non-nil if QUEUE is empty."
(null (queue-not-empty-p queue)))

(defun map-tree-iter (fun tree)
"Map FUN over TREE."
(let* ((queue (make-queue tree))
(ret (list nil))
(queue-ret (make-queue ret)))
(while (queue-not-empty-p queue)
(let ((front (queue-pop-front queue))
(front-ret (queue-pop-front queue-ret)))
(while front
(cond
((consp (car front))
(queue-push-back queue (car front))
(let ((list-ret (list nil)))
(queue-push-back queue-ret list-ret)
(setcar front-ret list-ret)))
((car front)
(setcar front-ret (funcall fun (car front))))
)
(setq front (cdr front))
(when front
(setcdr front-ret (list nil))
(setq front-ret (cdr front-ret))))))
ret))






share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 2 days ago

























answered Dec 23 at 4:32









Tobias

12.6k1833




12.6k1833












  • "Note that I did not care about execution speed" and yet you are using define-inline and defmacro. :)
    – Basil
    2 days ago




















  • "Note that I did not care about execution speed" and yet you are using define-inline and defmacro. :)
    – Basil
    2 days ago


















"Note that I did not care about execution speed" and yet you are using define-inline and defmacro. :)
– Basil
2 days ago






"Note that I did not care about execution speed" and yet you are using define-inline and defmacro. :)
– Basil
2 days ago













0














Since you have a list of lists, you have to mapcar over mapcar:



(defun mapmap (f lol)
(mapcar (lambda (l) (mapcar f l)) lol))

(mapmap #'upcase nested)
;; => (("KITTENS" "PUPPIES") ("OTTERS" "BUNNIES"))





share|improve this answer

















  • 2




    That only works for the rigid structure of a list of lists. The expression nested list actually stands for a tree structure. Your approach does not work for a more complicated tree.
    – Tobias
    Dec 19 at 21:02


















0














Since you have a list of lists, you have to mapcar over mapcar:



(defun mapmap (f lol)
(mapcar (lambda (l) (mapcar f l)) lol))

(mapmap #'upcase nested)
;; => (("KITTENS" "PUPPIES") ("OTTERS" "BUNNIES"))





share|improve this answer

















  • 2




    That only works for the rigid structure of a list of lists. The expression nested list actually stands for a tree structure. Your approach does not work for a more complicated tree.
    – Tobias
    Dec 19 at 21:02
















0












0








0






Since you have a list of lists, you have to mapcar over mapcar:



(defun mapmap (f lol)
(mapcar (lambda (l) (mapcar f l)) lol))

(mapmap #'upcase nested)
;; => (("KITTENS" "PUPPIES") ("OTTERS" "BUNNIES"))





share|improve this answer












Since you have a list of lists, you have to mapcar over mapcar:



(defun mapmap (f lol)
(mapcar (lambda (l) (mapcar f l)) lol))

(mapmap #'upcase nested)
;; => (("KITTENS" "PUPPIES") ("OTTERS" "BUNNIES"))






share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Dec 19 at 20:45









user3414663

285




285








  • 2




    That only works for the rigid structure of a list of lists. The expression nested list actually stands for a tree structure. Your approach does not work for a more complicated tree.
    – Tobias
    Dec 19 at 21:02
















  • 2




    That only works for the rigid structure of a list of lists. The expression nested list actually stands for a tree structure. Your approach does not work for a more complicated tree.
    – Tobias
    Dec 19 at 21:02










2




2




That only works for the rigid structure of a list of lists. The expression nested list actually stands for a tree structure. Your approach does not work for a more complicated tree.
– Tobias
Dec 19 at 21:02






That only works for the rigid structure of a list of lists. The expression nested list actually stands for a tree structure. Your approach does not work for a more complicated tree.
– Tobias
Dec 19 at 21:02




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Emacs Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2femacs.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f46680%2fmap-function-onto-nested-list%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Сан-Квентин

8-я гвардейская общевойсковая армия

Алькесар