Pythonic way of checking for dict keys











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












When checking a python dict for a key, which is the better way here:
(I can't figure how to use dict.get() to make this cleaner)



if 'y' in self.axes:
ax = self.axes['y'].ax
coord1[ax] = x0
coord2[ax] = (y1) - height[ax]
coord3[ax] = x0 + width[ax]
coord4[ax] = y1


or:



try:
ax = self.axes['y'].ax
except KeyError:
pass
else:
coord1[ax] = x0
coord2[ax] = (y1) - height[ax]
coord3[ax] = x0 + width[ax]
coord4[ax] = y1


The latter way is closer to EAFP but former seems clearer, especially for new code contributors who are scientists first & coders second.










share|improve this question


























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite












    When checking a python dict for a key, which is the better way here:
    (I can't figure how to use dict.get() to make this cleaner)



    if 'y' in self.axes:
    ax = self.axes['y'].ax
    coord1[ax] = x0
    coord2[ax] = (y1) - height[ax]
    coord3[ax] = x0 + width[ax]
    coord4[ax] = y1


    or:



    try:
    ax = self.axes['y'].ax
    except KeyError:
    pass
    else:
    coord1[ax] = x0
    coord2[ax] = (y1) - height[ax]
    coord3[ax] = x0 + width[ax]
    coord4[ax] = y1


    The latter way is closer to EAFP but former seems clearer, especially for new code contributors who are scientists first & coders second.










    share|improve this question
























      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite











      When checking a python dict for a key, which is the better way here:
      (I can't figure how to use dict.get() to make this cleaner)



      if 'y' in self.axes:
      ax = self.axes['y'].ax
      coord1[ax] = x0
      coord2[ax] = (y1) - height[ax]
      coord3[ax] = x0 + width[ax]
      coord4[ax] = y1


      or:



      try:
      ax = self.axes['y'].ax
      except KeyError:
      pass
      else:
      coord1[ax] = x0
      coord2[ax] = (y1) - height[ax]
      coord3[ax] = x0 + width[ax]
      coord4[ax] = y1


      The latter way is closer to EAFP but former seems clearer, especially for new code contributors who are scientists first & coders second.










      share|improve this question













      When checking a python dict for a key, which is the better way here:
      (I can't figure how to use dict.get() to make this cleaner)



      if 'y' in self.axes:
      ax = self.axes['y'].ax
      coord1[ax] = x0
      coord2[ax] = (y1) - height[ax]
      coord3[ax] = x0 + width[ax]
      coord4[ax] = y1


      or:



      try:
      ax = self.axes['y'].ax
      except KeyError:
      pass
      else:
      coord1[ax] = x0
      coord2[ax] = (y1) - height[ax]
      coord3[ax] = x0 + width[ax]
      coord4[ax] = y1


      The latter way is closer to EAFP but former seems clearer, especially for new code contributors who are scientists first & coders second.







      python dictionary






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Dec 11 at 19:48









      kchawla-pi

      1111




      1111






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          3
          down vote













          Both ways are valid and have their own advantages. Checking upfront using an if statement involve a bit of overheard for each usage, using EAFP involve greater overheads but only for the "wrong" case.



          So if you mostly have cases where 'y' is in self.axes then EAFP is better, otherwise LBYL is fine.



          But if you only are calling this pattern a handful of times, then either will do; or no, use the third approach contextlib.suppress because this except: pass is ugly:



          from contextlib import suppress


          with suppress(KeyError):
          ax = self.axes['y'].ax
          coord1[ax] = x0
          coord2[ax] = (y1) - height[ax]
          coord3[ax] = x0 + width[ax]
          coord4[ax] = y1





          share|improve this answer























          • I know that it's considered Pythonic to do "logic by exception", but in every other language it's discouraged, and it creeps me out.
            – Reinderien
            Dec 12 at 16:28


















          up vote
          3
          down vote













          Sort of neither, but closer to the first.



          y = self.axes.get('y')
          if y is not None:
          ax = y.ax
          coord1[ax] = x0
          coord2[ax] = y1 - height[ax]
          coord3[ax] = x0 + width[ax]
          coord4[ax] = y1


          get is a best-effort function that will (by default) return None if the key doesn't exist. This approach means you only ever need to do one key lookup.



          One of the reasons to prefer this method is that it can be faster than exceptions, depending on your data. To demonstrate,



          #!/usr/bin/env python3

          from contextlib import suppress
          from sys import version
          from timeit import timeit


          def exception_method(axes, coord):
          try:
          ax = axes['y']
          except KeyError:
          pass
          else:
          coord[ax] = 0


          def suppress_method(axes, coord):
          with suppress(KeyError):
          ax = axes['y']
          coord[ax] = 0


          def get_method(axes, coord):
          ax = axes.get('y')
          if ax is not None:
          coord[ax] = 0


          methods = ((suppress_method, 'contextlib.suppress'),
          (exception_method, 'exception swallowing'),
          (get_method, 'dict.get'))


          def trial(method_index, is_present):
          coord = {}
          axes = {'y': 0} if is_present else {}
          method, desc = methods[method_index]

          def run():
          method(axes, coord)

          REPS = 200000
          t = timeit(run, number=REPS)/REPS * 1e6

          print(f'Method: {desc:20}, '
          f'Key pre-exists: {str(is_present):5}, '
          f'Avg time (us): {t:.2f}')


          def main():
          print(version)

          for method in range(3):
          for present in (False, True):
          trial(method, present)


          if __name__ == '__main__':
          main()


          The output is:



          3.6.3 (v3.6.3:2c5fed8, Oct  3 2017, 18:11:49) [MSC v.1900 64 bit (AMD64)]
          Method: contextlib.suppress , Key pre-exists: False, Avg time (us): 8.86
          Method: contextlib.suppress , Key pre-exists: True , Avg time (us): 7.71
          Method: exception swallowing, Key pre-exists: False, Avg time (us): 3.70
          Method: exception swallowing, Key pre-exists: True , Avg time (us): 2.93
          Method: dict.get , Key pre-exists: False, Avg time (us): 2.90
          Method: dict.get , Key pre-exists: True , Avg time (us): 3.00


          If you can guarantee that in most cases the key will pre-exist, then the exception-swallowing method is marginally fastest. Otherwise, get is fastest.






          share|improve this answer



















          • 2




            I wonder if the upcoming syntax if ax := axis.get('y') is not None: coord[ax] = 0 will bring improvements.
            – Mathias Ettinger
            Dec 12 at 17:36











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "196"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f209468%2fpythonic-way-of-checking-for-dict-keys%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          3
          down vote













          Both ways are valid and have their own advantages. Checking upfront using an if statement involve a bit of overheard for each usage, using EAFP involve greater overheads but only for the "wrong" case.



          So if you mostly have cases where 'y' is in self.axes then EAFP is better, otherwise LBYL is fine.



          But if you only are calling this pattern a handful of times, then either will do; or no, use the third approach contextlib.suppress because this except: pass is ugly:



          from contextlib import suppress


          with suppress(KeyError):
          ax = self.axes['y'].ax
          coord1[ax] = x0
          coord2[ax] = (y1) - height[ax]
          coord3[ax] = x0 + width[ax]
          coord4[ax] = y1





          share|improve this answer























          • I know that it's considered Pythonic to do "logic by exception", but in every other language it's discouraged, and it creeps me out.
            – Reinderien
            Dec 12 at 16:28















          up vote
          3
          down vote













          Both ways are valid and have their own advantages. Checking upfront using an if statement involve a bit of overheard for each usage, using EAFP involve greater overheads but only for the "wrong" case.



          So if you mostly have cases where 'y' is in self.axes then EAFP is better, otherwise LBYL is fine.



          But if you only are calling this pattern a handful of times, then either will do; or no, use the third approach contextlib.suppress because this except: pass is ugly:



          from contextlib import suppress


          with suppress(KeyError):
          ax = self.axes['y'].ax
          coord1[ax] = x0
          coord2[ax] = (y1) - height[ax]
          coord3[ax] = x0 + width[ax]
          coord4[ax] = y1





          share|improve this answer























          • I know that it's considered Pythonic to do "logic by exception", but in every other language it's discouraged, and it creeps me out.
            – Reinderien
            Dec 12 at 16:28













          up vote
          3
          down vote










          up vote
          3
          down vote









          Both ways are valid and have their own advantages. Checking upfront using an if statement involve a bit of overheard for each usage, using EAFP involve greater overheads but only for the "wrong" case.



          So if you mostly have cases where 'y' is in self.axes then EAFP is better, otherwise LBYL is fine.



          But if you only are calling this pattern a handful of times, then either will do; or no, use the third approach contextlib.suppress because this except: pass is ugly:



          from contextlib import suppress


          with suppress(KeyError):
          ax = self.axes['y'].ax
          coord1[ax] = x0
          coord2[ax] = (y1) - height[ax]
          coord3[ax] = x0 + width[ax]
          coord4[ax] = y1





          share|improve this answer














          Both ways are valid and have their own advantages. Checking upfront using an if statement involve a bit of overheard for each usage, using EAFP involve greater overheads but only for the "wrong" case.



          So if you mostly have cases where 'y' is in self.axes then EAFP is better, otherwise LBYL is fine.



          But if you only are calling this pattern a handful of times, then either will do; or no, use the third approach contextlib.suppress because this except: pass is ugly:



          from contextlib import suppress


          with suppress(KeyError):
          ax = self.axes['y'].ax
          coord1[ax] = x0
          coord2[ax] = (y1) - height[ax]
          coord3[ax] = x0 + width[ax]
          coord4[ax] = y1






          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Dec 11 at 23:01









          IEatBagels

          8,85323178




          8,85323178










          answered Dec 11 at 22:33









          Mathias Ettinger

          23.3k33181




          23.3k33181












          • I know that it's considered Pythonic to do "logic by exception", but in every other language it's discouraged, and it creeps me out.
            – Reinderien
            Dec 12 at 16:28


















          • I know that it's considered Pythonic to do "logic by exception", but in every other language it's discouraged, and it creeps me out.
            – Reinderien
            Dec 12 at 16:28
















          I know that it's considered Pythonic to do "logic by exception", but in every other language it's discouraged, and it creeps me out.
          – Reinderien
          Dec 12 at 16:28




          I know that it's considered Pythonic to do "logic by exception", but in every other language it's discouraged, and it creeps me out.
          – Reinderien
          Dec 12 at 16:28












          up vote
          3
          down vote













          Sort of neither, but closer to the first.



          y = self.axes.get('y')
          if y is not None:
          ax = y.ax
          coord1[ax] = x0
          coord2[ax] = y1 - height[ax]
          coord3[ax] = x0 + width[ax]
          coord4[ax] = y1


          get is a best-effort function that will (by default) return None if the key doesn't exist. This approach means you only ever need to do one key lookup.



          One of the reasons to prefer this method is that it can be faster than exceptions, depending on your data. To demonstrate,



          #!/usr/bin/env python3

          from contextlib import suppress
          from sys import version
          from timeit import timeit


          def exception_method(axes, coord):
          try:
          ax = axes['y']
          except KeyError:
          pass
          else:
          coord[ax] = 0


          def suppress_method(axes, coord):
          with suppress(KeyError):
          ax = axes['y']
          coord[ax] = 0


          def get_method(axes, coord):
          ax = axes.get('y')
          if ax is not None:
          coord[ax] = 0


          methods = ((suppress_method, 'contextlib.suppress'),
          (exception_method, 'exception swallowing'),
          (get_method, 'dict.get'))


          def trial(method_index, is_present):
          coord = {}
          axes = {'y': 0} if is_present else {}
          method, desc = methods[method_index]

          def run():
          method(axes, coord)

          REPS = 200000
          t = timeit(run, number=REPS)/REPS * 1e6

          print(f'Method: {desc:20}, '
          f'Key pre-exists: {str(is_present):5}, '
          f'Avg time (us): {t:.2f}')


          def main():
          print(version)

          for method in range(3):
          for present in (False, True):
          trial(method, present)


          if __name__ == '__main__':
          main()


          The output is:



          3.6.3 (v3.6.3:2c5fed8, Oct  3 2017, 18:11:49) [MSC v.1900 64 bit (AMD64)]
          Method: contextlib.suppress , Key pre-exists: False, Avg time (us): 8.86
          Method: contextlib.suppress , Key pre-exists: True , Avg time (us): 7.71
          Method: exception swallowing, Key pre-exists: False, Avg time (us): 3.70
          Method: exception swallowing, Key pre-exists: True , Avg time (us): 2.93
          Method: dict.get , Key pre-exists: False, Avg time (us): 2.90
          Method: dict.get , Key pre-exists: True , Avg time (us): 3.00


          If you can guarantee that in most cases the key will pre-exist, then the exception-swallowing method is marginally fastest. Otherwise, get is fastest.






          share|improve this answer



















          • 2




            I wonder if the upcoming syntax if ax := axis.get('y') is not None: coord[ax] = 0 will bring improvements.
            – Mathias Ettinger
            Dec 12 at 17:36















          up vote
          3
          down vote













          Sort of neither, but closer to the first.



          y = self.axes.get('y')
          if y is not None:
          ax = y.ax
          coord1[ax] = x0
          coord2[ax] = y1 - height[ax]
          coord3[ax] = x0 + width[ax]
          coord4[ax] = y1


          get is a best-effort function that will (by default) return None if the key doesn't exist. This approach means you only ever need to do one key lookup.



          One of the reasons to prefer this method is that it can be faster than exceptions, depending on your data. To demonstrate,



          #!/usr/bin/env python3

          from contextlib import suppress
          from sys import version
          from timeit import timeit


          def exception_method(axes, coord):
          try:
          ax = axes['y']
          except KeyError:
          pass
          else:
          coord[ax] = 0


          def suppress_method(axes, coord):
          with suppress(KeyError):
          ax = axes['y']
          coord[ax] = 0


          def get_method(axes, coord):
          ax = axes.get('y')
          if ax is not None:
          coord[ax] = 0


          methods = ((suppress_method, 'contextlib.suppress'),
          (exception_method, 'exception swallowing'),
          (get_method, 'dict.get'))


          def trial(method_index, is_present):
          coord = {}
          axes = {'y': 0} if is_present else {}
          method, desc = methods[method_index]

          def run():
          method(axes, coord)

          REPS = 200000
          t = timeit(run, number=REPS)/REPS * 1e6

          print(f'Method: {desc:20}, '
          f'Key pre-exists: {str(is_present):5}, '
          f'Avg time (us): {t:.2f}')


          def main():
          print(version)

          for method in range(3):
          for present in (False, True):
          trial(method, present)


          if __name__ == '__main__':
          main()


          The output is:



          3.6.3 (v3.6.3:2c5fed8, Oct  3 2017, 18:11:49) [MSC v.1900 64 bit (AMD64)]
          Method: contextlib.suppress , Key pre-exists: False, Avg time (us): 8.86
          Method: contextlib.suppress , Key pre-exists: True , Avg time (us): 7.71
          Method: exception swallowing, Key pre-exists: False, Avg time (us): 3.70
          Method: exception swallowing, Key pre-exists: True , Avg time (us): 2.93
          Method: dict.get , Key pre-exists: False, Avg time (us): 2.90
          Method: dict.get , Key pre-exists: True , Avg time (us): 3.00


          If you can guarantee that in most cases the key will pre-exist, then the exception-swallowing method is marginally fastest. Otherwise, get is fastest.






          share|improve this answer



















          • 2




            I wonder if the upcoming syntax if ax := axis.get('y') is not None: coord[ax] = 0 will bring improvements.
            – Mathias Ettinger
            Dec 12 at 17:36













          up vote
          3
          down vote










          up vote
          3
          down vote









          Sort of neither, but closer to the first.



          y = self.axes.get('y')
          if y is not None:
          ax = y.ax
          coord1[ax] = x0
          coord2[ax] = y1 - height[ax]
          coord3[ax] = x0 + width[ax]
          coord4[ax] = y1


          get is a best-effort function that will (by default) return None if the key doesn't exist. This approach means you only ever need to do one key lookup.



          One of the reasons to prefer this method is that it can be faster than exceptions, depending on your data. To demonstrate,



          #!/usr/bin/env python3

          from contextlib import suppress
          from sys import version
          from timeit import timeit


          def exception_method(axes, coord):
          try:
          ax = axes['y']
          except KeyError:
          pass
          else:
          coord[ax] = 0


          def suppress_method(axes, coord):
          with suppress(KeyError):
          ax = axes['y']
          coord[ax] = 0


          def get_method(axes, coord):
          ax = axes.get('y')
          if ax is not None:
          coord[ax] = 0


          methods = ((suppress_method, 'contextlib.suppress'),
          (exception_method, 'exception swallowing'),
          (get_method, 'dict.get'))


          def trial(method_index, is_present):
          coord = {}
          axes = {'y': 0} if is_present else {}
          method, desc = methods[method_index]

          def run():
          method(axes, coord)

          REPS = 200000
          t = timeit(run, number=REPS)/REPS * 1e6

          print(f'Method: {desc:20}, '
          f'Key pre-exists: {str(is_present):5}, '
          f'Avg time (us): {t:.2f}')


          def main():
          print(version)

          for method in range(3):
          for present in (False, True):
          trial(method, present)


          if __name__ == '__main__':
          main()


          The output is:



          3.6.3 (v3.6.3:2c5fed8, Oct  3 2017, 18:11:49) [MSC v.1900 64 bit (AMD64)]
          Method: contextlib.suppress , Key pre-exists: False, Avg time (us): 8.86
          Method: contextlib.suppress , Key pre-exists: True , Avg time (us): 7.71
          Method: exception swallowing, Key pre-exists: False, Avg time (us): 3.70
          Method: exception swallowing, Key pre-exists: True , Avg time (us): 2.93
          Method: dict.get , Key pre-exists: False, Avg time (us): 2.90
          Method: dict.get , Key pre-exists: True , Avg time (us): 3.00


          If you can guarantee that in most cases the key will pre-exist, then the exception-swallowing method is marginally fastest. Otherwise, get is fastest.






          share|improve this answer














          Sort of neither, but closer to the first.



          y = self.axes.get('y')
          if y is not None:
          ax = y.ax
          coord1[ax] = x0
          coord2[ax] = y1 - height[ax]
          coord3[ax] = x0 + width[ax]
          coord4[ax] = y1


          get is a best-effort function that will (by default) return None if the key doesn't exist. This approach means you only ever need to do one key lookup.



          One of the reasons to prefer this method is that it can be faster than exceptions, depending on your data. To demonstrate,



          #!/usr/bin/env python3

          from contextlib import suppress
          from sys import version
          from timeit import timeit


          def exception_method(axes, coord):
          try:
          ax = axes['y']
          except KeyError:
          pass
          else:
          coord[ax] = 0


          def suppress_method(axes, coord):
          with suppress(KeyError):
          ax = axes['y']
          coord[ax] = 0


          def get_method(axes, coord):
          ax = axes.get('y')
          if ax is not None:
          coord[ax] = 0


          methods = ((suppress_method, 'contextlib.suppress'),
          (exception_method, 'exception swallowing'),
          (get_method, 'dict.get'))


          def trial(method_index, is_present):
          coord = {}
          axes = {'y': 0} if is_present else {}
          method, desc = methods[method_index]

          def run():
          method(axes, coord)

          REPS = 200000
          t = timeit(run, number=REPS)/REPS * 1e6

          print(f'Method: {desc:20}, '
          f'Key pre-exists: {str(is_present):5}, '
          f'Avg time (us): {t:.2f}')


          def main():
          print(version)

          for method in range(3):
          for present in (False, True):
          trial(method, present)


          if __name__ == '__main__':
          main()


          The output is:



          3.6.3 (v3.6.3:2c5fed8, Oct  3 2017, 18:11:49) [MSC v.1900 64 bit (AMD64)]
          Method: contextlib.suppress , Key pre-exists: False, Avg time (us): 8.86
          Method: contextlib.suppress , Key pre-exists: True , Avg time (us): 7.71
          Method: exception swallowing, Key pre-exists: False, Avg time (us): 3.70
          Method: exception swallowing, Key pre-exists: True , Avg time (us): 2.93
          Method: dict.get , Key pre-exists: False, Avg time (us): 2.90
          Method: dict.get , Key pre-exists: True , Avg time (us): 3.00


          If you can guarantee that in most cases the key will pre-exist, then the exception-swallowing method is marginally fastest. Otherwise, get is fastest.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Dec 12 at 17:12

























          answered Dec 11 at 20:55









          Reinderien

          2,047616




          2,047616








          • 2




            I wonder if the upcoming syntax if ax := axis.get('y') is not None: coord[ax] = 0 will bring improvements.
            – Mathias Ettinger
            Dec 12 at 17:36














          • 2




            I wonder if the upcoming syntax if ax := axis.get('y') is not None: coord[ax] = 0 will bring improvements.
            – Mathias Ettinger
            Dec 12 at 17:36








          2




          2




          I wonder if the upcoming syntax if ax := axis.get('y') is not None: coord[ax] = 0 will bring improvements.
          – Mathias Ettinger
          Dec 12 at 17:36




          I wonder if the upcoming syntax if ax := axis.get('y') is not None: coord[ax] = 0 will bring improvements.
          – Mathias Ettinger
          Dec 12 at 17:36


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f209468%2fpythonic-way-of-checking-for-dict-keys%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Сан-Квентин

          Алькесар

          Josef Freinademetz