Python - username and password authentication
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
How can I reduce the amount of if statements in this program to make it more robust and any other tips for improvement would be grateful.
# importing pickle
import pickle
# defining variables
create_username = 0
create_password = 0
password = 0
username = 0
# this variable allows the user or denies the user to the rest of the program (will only run if access is 1)
access = 0
# creates a users dictionary
with open('users.pickle', 'rb') as f:
users = pickle.load(f)
print(users)
# sign up (creating new account)
while username not in users and username != 'signup':
username = input("enter username(type signup to create an account): ")
# add new user to dictionary
if username == "signup" or username == "Signup":
create_username = input("enter a new username: ")
create_password = input("enter a new password (Your password cannot be the same as your username !!!!!!!): ")
if create_password in users:
create_password = input("password taken re-enter: ")
# then adds the new username to the users dictionary
if username == 'signup':
users[create_username] = create_password
if username in users:
password = input("enter password: ")
if password in users:
print("access granted")
access = 1
if username not in users and username != 'signup':
username = input("enter username: ")
if username in users:
password = input("enter password")
if password in users:
print("access granted")
access = 1
if password not in users:
print("access denied")
with open('users.pickle', 'wb') as f:
# Pickle the 'data' dictionary using the highest protocol available.
pickle.dump(users, f, pickle.HIGHEST_PROTOCOL)
print(users)
python
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
How can I reduce the amount of if statements in this program to make it more robust and any other tips for improvement would be grateful.
# importing pickle
import pickle
# defining variables
create_username = 0
create_password = 0
password = 0
username = 0
# this variable allows the user or denies the user to the rest of the program (will only run if access is 1)
access = 0
# creates a users dictionary
with open('users.pickle', 'rb') as f:
users = pickle.load(f)
print(users)
# sign up (creating new account)
while username not in users and username != 'signup':
username = input("enter username(type signup to create an account): ")
# add new user to dictionary
if username == "signup" or username == "Signup":
create_username = input("enter a new username: ")
create_password = input("enter a new password (Your password cannot be the same as your username !!!!!!!): ")
if create_password in users:
create_password = input("password taken re-enter: ")
# then adds the new username to the users dictionary
if username == 'signup':
users[create_username] = create_password
if username in users:
password = input("enter password: ")
if password in users:
print("access granted")
access = 1
if username not in users and username != 'signup':
username = input("enter username: ")
if username in users:
password = input("enter password")
if password in users:
print("access granted")
access = 1
if password not in users:
print("access denied")
with open('users.pickle', 'wb') as f:
# Pickle the 'data' dictionary using the highest protocol available.
pickle.dump(users, f, pickle.HIGHEST_PROTOCOL)
print(users)
python
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
How can I reduce the amount of if statements in this program to make it more robust and any other tips for improvement would be grateful.
# importing pickle
import pickle
# defining variables
create_username = 0
create_password = 0
password = 0
username = 0
# this variable allows the user or denies the user to the rest of the program (will only run if access is 1)
access = 0
# creates a users dictionary
with open('users.pickle', 'rb') as f:
users = pickle.load(f)
print(users)
# sign up (creating new account)
while username not in users and username != 'signup':
username = input("enter username(type signup to create an account): ")
# add new user to dictionary
if username == "signup" or username == "Signup":
create_username = input("enter a new username: ")
create_password = input("enter a new password (Your password cannot be the same as your username !!!!!!!): ")
if create_password in users:
create_password = input("password taken re-enter: ")
# then adds the new username to the users dictionary
if username == 'signup':
users[create_username] = create_password
if username in users:
password = input("enter password: ")
if password in users:
print("access granted")
access = 1
if username not in users and username != 'signup':
username = input("enter username: ")
if username in users:
password = input("enter password")
if password in users:
print("access granted")
access = 1
if password not in users:
print("access denied")
with open('users.pickle', 'wb') as f:
# Pickle the 'data' dictionary using the highest protocol available.
pickle.dump(users, f, pickle.HIGHEST_PROTOCOL)
print(users)
python
How can I reduce the amount of if statements in this program to make it more robust and any other tips for improvement would be grateful.
# importing pickle
import pickle
# defining variables
create_username = 0
create_password = 0
password = 0
username = 0
# this variable allows the user or denies the user to the rest of the program (will only run if access is 1)
access = 0
# creates a users dictionary
with open('users.pickle', 'rb') as f:
users = pickle.load(f)
print(users)
# sign up (creating new account)
while username not in users and username != 'signup':
username = input("enter username(type signup to create an account): ")
# add new user to dictionary
if username == "signup" or username == "Signup":
create_username = input("enter a new username: ")
create_password = input("enter a new password (Your password cannot be the same as your username !!!!!!!): ")
if create_password in users:
create_password = input("password taken re-enter: ")
# then adds the new username to the users dictionary
if username == 'signup':
users[create_username] = create_password
if username in users:
password = input("enter password: ")
if password in users:
print("access granted")
access = 1
if username not in users and username != 'signup':
username = input("enter username: ")
if username in users:
password = input("enter password")
if password in users:
print("access granted")
access = 1
if password not in users:
print("access denied")
with open('users.pickle', 'wb') as f:
# Pickle the 'data' dictionary using the highest protocol available.
pickle.dump(users, f, pickle.HIGHEST_PROTOCOL)
print(users)
python
python
asked Dec 11 at 18:13
Krishna
312
312
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
# importing pickle
Obviously. Don't clutter your code with comments unless they add something we don't already know.
# defining variables
create_username = 0
create_password = 0
password = 0
username = 0
This is generally a bad idea, and you aren't in mid-1990s C. Don't predeclare your variables. Initialize them where they're actually used.
print(users)
If users
is a plain-old dictionary, I recommend the use of pprint
instead of print
.
"enter username(type signup to create an account): "
This is called in-band control, and is a bad idea. What if someone's username is called "signup"? You want out-of-band control. Ask explicitly whether the user wants to sign up or log in.
if username == "signup" or username == "Signup":
Don't do two comparisons. Convert username
to lowercase and compare with 'signup'
.
Can you please explain why predeclaring variables is a bad idea, and something to avoid?
– van der Zon Stef
Dec 12 at 6:52
1
@vanderZonStef It's a habit from pre-99 C. It's not necessary in nearly all languages, now. Programs read easier if the variables aren't introduced until they're actually used. Plus, Python doesn't really have the concept of variable declaration at all; only variable assignment with implicit declaration.
– Reinderien
Dec 12 at 15:31
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Bugs
Both your check for an existing user and checking if the user entered the correct password are not working correctly:
if create_password in users:
create_password = input("password taken re-enter: ")
This just checks if the just entered password is also a username already in use. in
for dictionaries checks only if a value is present in the keys of the dictionary, not the values.
But even if this would be working like you intended (checking if this is the password of another user), checking if another user has the same password is very dangerous. First of all it gives away the fact that you are saving your passwords in clear text, which you shouldn't, anyway. In the best case the user will not want to use your system for that reason alone, in the worst case they will want to crack it.
And for this second case there is even more information now, because now they know the password of one other user! They just don't know which one, but if they keep on trying passwords and save them whenever they are already taken, they get a nice dictionary of passwords, where they know that each one is some users password. If they want to crack some specific users account, they just try all of them.
if username in users:
password = input("enter password")
if password in users:
print("access granted")
access = 1
This checks if the user exists (good) and if another user with the username of the just entered password also exists, but not if the password is the password of the user who wants to login (bad).
This means that you can login to your system by knowing a single username! Just enter the username as both the username and the password and you are guaranteed access.
Instead, you want to check if the password is that users password:
if username in users:
password = input("enter password: ")
if password == users[username]:
print("access granted")
access = 1
This also makes sure that the check for the password is only performed if the user actually entered a password. Otherwise it will check if the user 0
exists in users (in your current version) or it will raise a KeyError
, since user[username]
does not exist (in this version where the if
is not nested).
Style
Using 1
and 0
for logged-in and not logged-in, respectively, sounds like you will mess this up at least once. Instead used logged_in = False
in the beginning and then later set it to logged_in = True
if the login is successful.
Indeed, you should probably move all of your code to separate functions, one of which, the login
function, returns True
or False
depending on whether or not the login was successful.
1
Thanks didn't know about the bug with the user just needing to enter the username twice! quite a big bug actually come to think of it.
– Krishna
Dec 12 at 19:41
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "196"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f209464%2fpython-username-and-password-authentication%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
# importing pickle
Obviously. Don't clutter your code with comments unless they add something we don't already know.
# defining variables
create_username = 0
create_password = 0
password = 0
username = 0
This is generally a bad idea, and you aren't in mid-1990s C. Don't predeclare your variables. Initialize them where they're actually used.
print(users)
If users
is a plain-old dictionary, I recommend the use of pprint
instead of print
.
"enter username(type signup to create an account): "
This is called in-band control, and is a bad idea. What if someone's username is called "signup"? You want out-of-band control. Ask explicitly whether the user wants to sign up or log in.
if username == "signup" or username == "Signup":
Don't do two comparisons. Convert username
to lowercase and compare with 'signup'
.
Can you please explain why predeclaring variables is a bad idea, and something to avoid?
– van der Zon Stef
Dec 12 at 6:52
1
@vanderZonStef It's a habit from pre-99 C. It's not necessary in nearly all languages, now. Programs read easier if the variables aren't introduced until they're actually used. Plus, Python doesn't really have the concept of variable declaration at all; only variable assignment with implicit declaration.
– Reinderien
Dec 12 at 15:31
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
# importing pickle
Obviously. Don't clutter your code with comments unless they add something we don't already know.
# defining variables
create_username = 0
create_password = 0
password = 0
username = 0
This is generally a bad idea, and you aren't in mid-1990s C. Don't predeclare your variables. Initialize them where they're actually used.
print(users)
If users
is a plain-old dictionary, I recommend the use of pprint
instead of print
.
"enter username(type signup to create an account): "
This is called in-band control, and is a bad idea. What if someone's username is called "signup"? You want out-of-band control. Ask explicitly whether the user wants to sign up or log in.
if username == "signup" or username == "Signup":
Don't do two comparisons. Convert username
to lowercase and compare with 'signup'
.
Can you please explain why predeclaring variables is a bad idea, and something to avoid?
– van der Zon Stef
Dec 12 at 6:52
1
@vanderZonStef It's a habit from pre-99 C. It's not necessary in nearly all languages, now. Programs read easier if the variables aren't introduced until they're actually used. Plus, Python doesn't really have the concept of variable declaration at all; only variable assignment with implicit declaration.
– Reinderien
Dec 12 at 15:31
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
# importing pickle
Obviously. Don't clutter your code with comments unless they add something we don't already know.
# defining variables
create_username = 0
create_password = 0
password = 0
username = 0
This is generally a bad idea, and you aren't in mid-1990s C. Don't predeclare your variables. Initialize them where they're actually used.
print(users)
If users
is a plain-old dictionary, I recommend the use of pprint
instead of print
.
"enter username(type signup to create an account): "
This is called in-band control, and is a bad idea. What if someone's username is called "signup"? You want out-of-band control. Ask explicitly whether the user wants to sign up or log in.
if username == "signup" or username == "Signup":
Don't do two comparisons. Convert username
to lowercase and compare with 'signup'
.
# importing pickle
Obviously. Don't clutter your code with comments unless they add something we don't already know.
# defining variables
create_username = 0
create_password = 0
password = 0
username = 0
This is generally a bad idea, and you aren't in mid-1990s C. Don't predeclare your variables. Initialize them where they're actually used.
print(users)
If users
is a plain-old dictionary, I recommend the use of pprint
instead of print
.
"enter username(type signup to create an account): "
This is called in-band control, and is a bad idea. What if someone's username is called "signup"? You want out-of-band control. Ask explicitly whether the user wants to sign up or log in.
if username == "signup" or username == "Signup":
Don't do two comparisons. Convert username
to lowercase and compare with 'signup'
.
answered Dec 11 at 21:01
Reinderien
2,047616
2,047616
Can you please explain why predeclaring variables is a bad idea, and something to avoid?
– van der Zon Stef
Dec 12 at 6:52
1
@vanderZonStef It's a habit from pre-99 C. It's not necessary in nearly all languages, now. Programs read easier if the variables aren't introduced until they're actually used. Plus, Python doesn't really have the concept of variable declaration at all; only variable assignment with implicit declaration.
– Reinderien
Dec 12 at 15:31
add a comment |
Can you please explain why predeclaring variables is a bad idea, and something to avoid?
– van der Zon Stef
Dec 12 at 6:52
1
@vanderZonStef It's a habit from pre-99 C. It's not necessary in nearly all languages, now. Programs read easier if the variables aren't introduced until they're actually used. Plus, Python doesn't really have the concept of variable declaration at all; only variable assignment with implicit declaration.
– Reinderien
Dec 12 at 15:31
Can you please explain why predeclaring variables is a bad idea, and something to avoid?
– van der Zon Stef
Dec 12 at 6:52
Can you please explain why predeclaring variables is a bad idea, and something to avoid?
– van der Zon Stef
Dec 12 at 6:52
1
1
@vanderZonStef It's a habit from pre-99 C. It's not necessary in nearly all languages, now. Programs read easier if the variables aren't introduced until they're actually used. Plus, Python doesn't really have the concept of variable declaration at all; only variable assignment with implicit declaration.
– Reinderien
Dec 12 at 15:31
@vanderZonStef It's a habit from pre-99 C. It's not necessary in nearly all languages, now. Programs read easier if the variables aren't introduced until they're actually used. Plus, Python doesn't really have the concept of variable declaration at all; only variable assignment with implicit declaration.
– Reinderien
Dec 12 at 15:31
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Bugs
Both your check for an existing user and checking if the user entered the correct password are not working correctly:
if create_password in users:
create_password = input("password taken re-enter: ")
This just checks if the just entered password is also a username already in use. in
for dictionaries checks only if a value is present in the keys of the dictionary, not the values.
But even if this would be working like you intended (checking if this is the password of another user), checking if another user has the same password is very dangerous. First of all it gives away the fact that you are saving your passwords in clear text, which you shouldn't, anyway. In the best case the user will not want to use your system for that reason alone, in the worst case they will want to crack it.
And for this second case there is even more information now, because now they know the password of one other user! They just don't know which one, but if they keep on trying passwords and save them whenever they are already taken, they get a nice dictionary of passwords, where they know that each one is some users password. If they want to crack some specific users account, they just try all of them.
if username in users:
password = input("enter password")
if password in users:
print("access granted")
access = 1
This checks if the user exists (good) and if another user with the username of the just entered password also exists, but not if the password is the password of the user who wants to login (bad).
This means that you can login to your system by knowing a single username! Just enter the username as both the username and the password and you are guaranteed access.
Instead, you want to check if the password is that users password:
if username in users:
password = input("enter password: ")
if password == users[username]:
print("access granted")
access = 1
This also makes sure that the check for the password is only performed if the user actually entered a password. Otherwise it will check if the user 0
exists in users (in your current version) or it will raise a KeyError
, since user[username]
does not exist (in this version where the if
is not nested).
Style
Using 1
and 0
for logged-in and not logged-in, respectively, sounds like you will mess this up at least once. Instead used logged_in = False
in the beginning and then later set it to logged_in = True
if the login is successful.
Indeed, you should probably move all of your code to separate functions, one of which, the login
function, returns True
or False
depending on whether or not the login was successful.
1
Thanks didn't know about the bug with the user just needing to enter the username twice! quite a big bug actually come to think of it.
– Krishna
Dec 12 at 19:41
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Bugs
Both your check for an existing user and checking if the user entered the correct password are not working correctly:
if create_password in users:
create_password = input("password taken re-enter: ")
This just checks if the just entered password is also a username already in use. in
for dictionaries checks only if a value is present in the keys of the dictionary, not the values.
But even if this would be working like you intended (checking if this is the password of another user), checking if another user has the same password is very dangerous. First of all it gives away the fact that you are saving your passwords in clear text, which you shouldn't, anyway. In the best case the user will not want to use your system for that reason alone, in the worst case they will want to crack it.
And for this second case there is even more information now, because now they know the password of one other user! They just don't know which one, but if they keep on trying passwords and save them whenever they are already taken, they get a nice dictionary of passwords, where they know that each one is some users password. If they want to crack some specific users account, they just try all of them.
if username in users:
password = input("enter password")
if password in users:
print("access granted")
access = 1
This checks if the user exists (good) and if another user with the username of the just entered password also exists, but not if the password is the password of the user who wants to login (bad).
This means that you can login to your system by knowing a single username! Just enter the username as both the username and the password and you are guaranteed access.
Instead, you want to check if the password is that users password:
if username in users:
password = input("enter password: ")
if password == users[username]:
print("access granted")
access = 1
This also makes sure that the check for the password is only performed if the user actually entered a password. Otherwise it will check if the user 0
exists in users (in your current version) or it will raise a KeyError
, since user[username]
does not exist (in this version where the if
is not nested).
Style
Using 1
and 0
for logged-in and not logged-in, respectively, sounds like you will mess this up at least once. Instead used logged_in = False
in the beginning and then later set it to logged_in = True
if the login is successful.
Indeed, you should probably move all of your code to separate functions, one of which, the login
function, returns True
or False
depending on whether or not the login was successful.
1
Thanks didn't know about the bug with the user just needing to enter the username twice! quite a big bug actually come to think of it.
– Krishna
Dec 12 at 19:41
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
Bugs
Both your check for an existing user and checking if the user entered the correct password are not working correctly:
if create_password in users:
create_password = input("password taken re-enter: ")
This just checks if the just entered password is also a username already in use. in
for dictionaries checks only if a value is present in the keys of the dictionary, not the values.
But even if this would be working like you intended (checking if this is the password of another user), checking if another user has the same password is very dangerous. First of all it gives away the fact that you are saving your passwords in clear text, which you shouldn't, anyway. In the best case the user will not want to use your system for that reason alone, in the worst case they will want to crack it.
And for this second case there is even more information now, because now they know the password of one other user! They just don't know which one, but if they keep on trying passwords and save them whenever they are already taken, they get a nice dictionary of passwords, where they know that each one is some users password. If they want to crack some specific users account, they just try all of them.
if username in users:
password = input("enter password")
if password in users:
print("access granted")
access = 1
This checks if the user exists (good) and if another user with the username of the just entered password also exists, but not if the password is the password of the user who wants to login (bad).
This means that you can login to your system by knowing a single username! Just enter the username as both the username and the password and you are guaranteed access.
Instead, you want to check if the password is that users password:
if username in users:
password = input("enter password: ")
if password == users[username]:
print("access granted")
access = 1
This also makes sure that the check for the password is only performed if the user actually entered a password. Otherwise it will check if the user 0
exists in users (in your current version) or it will raise a KeyError
, since user[username]
does not exist (in this version where the if
is not nested).
Style
Using 1
and 0
for logged-in and not logged-in, respectively, sounds like you will mess this up at least once. Instead used logged_in = False
in the beginning and then later set it to logged_in = True
if the login is successful.
Indeed, you should probably move all of your code to separate functions, one of which, the login
function, returns True
or False
depending on whether or not the login was successful.
Bugs
Both your check for an existing user and checking if the user entered the correct password are not working correctly:
if create_password in users:
create_password = input("password taken re-enter: ")
This just checks if the just entered password is also a username already in use. in
for dictionaries checks only if a value is present in the keys of the dictionary, not the values.
But even if this would be working like you intended (checking if this is the password of another user), checking if another user has the same password is very dangerous. First of all it gives away the fact that you are saving your passwords in clear text, which you shouldn't, anyway. In the best case the user will not want to use your system for that reason alone, in the worst case they will want to crack it.
And for this second case there is even more information now, because now they know the password of one other user! They just don't know which one, but if they keep on trying passwords and save them whenever they are already taken, they get a nice dictionary of passwords, where they know that each one is some users password. If they want to crack some specific users account, they just try all of them.
if username in users:
password = input("enter password")
if password in users:
print("access granted")
access = 1
This checks if the user exists (good) and if another user with the username of the just entered password also exists, but not if the password is the password of the user who wants to login (bad).
This means that you can login to your system by knowing a single username! Just enter the username as both the username and the password and you are guaranteed access.
Instead, you want to check if the password is that users password:
if username in users:
password = input("enter password: ")
if password == users[username]:
print("access granted")
access = 1
This also makes sure that the check for the password is only performed if the user actually entered a password. Otherwise it will check if the user 0
exists in users (in your current version) or it will raise a KeyError
, since user[username]
does not exist (in this version where the if
is not nested).
Style
Using 1
and 0
for logged-in and not logged-in, respectively, sounds like you will mess this up at least once. Instead used logged_in = False
in the beginning and then later set it to logged_in = True
if the login is successful.
Indeed, you should probably move all of your code to separate functions, one of which, the login
function, returns True
or False
depending on whether or not the login was successful.
answered Dec 12 at 11:00
Graipher
23.3k53485
23.3k53485
1
Thanks didn't know about the bug with the user just needing to enter the username twice! quite a big bug actually come to think of it.
– Krishna
Dec 12 at 19:41
add a comment |
1
Thanks didn't know about the bug with the user just needing to enter the username twice! quite a big bug actually come to think of it.
– Krishna
Dec 12 at 19:41
1
1
Thanks didn't know about the bug with the user just needing to enter the username twice! quite a big bug actually come to think of it.
– Krishna
Dec 12 at 19:41
Thanks didn't know about the bug with the user just needing to enter the username twice! quite a big bug actually come to think of it.
– Krishna
Dec 12 at 19:41
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f209464%2fpython-username-and-password-authentication%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown