Why Bash does not scan all of its own history file
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}
I use a common history for all sessions. It happens to me frequently, that a part of the history is lost, however. Therefore, I just swap different "common session" scripts in a hope that one will fix it, no way so far. It works mostly, but not always.
I just decided to look more closely into this, when Ctrl+R valgrind
showed nothing. Yes, it is in the history file - opening .bash_history
in an editor and searching shows multiple commands that begin with valgrind
.
Still, history |grep valgrind
shows just itself, and in fact, that very command is put into the said .bash_history
, at the very end of it, long after the other commands containing valgrind
. And it is not a typo - the history file contains many iptables
commands, these are invisible by history
and by Ctrl+R. The more recent history in the same file is visible and accessing it works fine.
I would doubt, that Bash history is broken so much. Any explanation?
EDIT: There is a similar question, with no real answer: Is there a limit on how many entries the 'Control R' bash shortcut searches?
command-line bash command-history
add a comment |
I use a common history for all sessions. It happens to me frequently, that a part of the history is lost, however. Therefore, I just swap different "common session" scripts in a hope that one will fix it, no way so far. It works mostly, but not always.
I just decided to look more closely into this, when Ctrl+R valgrind
showed nothing. Yes, it is in the history file - opening .bash_history
in an editor and searching shows multiple commands that begin with valgrind
.
Still, history |grep valgrind
shows just itself, and in fact, that very command is put into the said .bash_history
, at the very end of it, long after the other commands containing valgrind
. And it is not a typo - the history file contains many iptables
commands, these are invisible by history
and by Ctrl+R. The more recent history in the same file is visible and accessing it works fine.
I would doubt, that Bash history is broken so much. Any explanation?
EDIT: There is a similar question, with no real answer: Is there a limit on how many entries the 'Control R' bash shortcut searches?
command-line bash command-history
1
Does this help? superuser.com/questions/211966/…
– Jimbo
Feb 6 at 13:14
No. As I said, I already use a common Bash history.
– scriptfoo
Feb 6 at 13:27
So you did, sorry.
– Jimbo
Feb 6 at 13:30
add a comment |
I use a common history for all sessions. It happens to me frequently, that a part of the history is lost, however. Therefore, I just swap different "common session" scripts in a hope that one will fix it, no way so far. It works mostly, but not always.
I just decided to look more closely into this, when Ctrl+R valgrind
showed nothing. Yes, it is in the history file - opening .bash_history
in an editor and searching shows multiple commands that begin with valgrind
.
Still, history |grep valgrind
shows just itself, and in fact, that very command is put into the said .bash_history
, at the very end of it, long after the other commands containing valgrind
. And it is not a typo - the history file contains many iptables
commands, these are invisible by history
and by Ctrl+R. The more recent history in the same file is visible and accessing it works fine.
I would doubt, that Bash history is broken so much. Any explanation?
EDIT: There is a similar question, with no real answer: Is there a limit on how many entries the 'Control R' bash shortcut searches?
command-line bash command-history
I use a common history for all sessions. It happens to me frequently, that a part of the history is lost, however. Therefore, I just swap different "common session" scripts in a hope that one will fix it, no way so far. It works mostly, but not always.
I just decided to look more closely into this, when Ctrl+R valgrind
showed nothing. Yes, it is in the history file - opening .bash_history
in an editor and searching shows multiple commands that begin with valgrind
.
Still, history |grep valgrind
shows just itself, and in fact, that very command is put into the said .bash_history
, at the very end of it, long after the other commands containing valgrind
. And it is not a typo - the history file contains many iptables
commands, these are invisible by history
and by Ctrl+R. The more recent history in the same file is visible and accessing it works fine.
I would doubt, that Bash history is broken so much. Any explanation?
EDIT: There is a similar question, with no real answer: Is there a limit on how many entries the 'Control R' bash shortcut searches?
command-line bash command-history
command-line bash command-history
edited Feb 6 at 14:38
scriptfoo
asked Feb 6 at 13:04
scriptfooscriptfoo
93
93
1
Does this help? superuser.com/questions/211966/…
– Jimbo
Feb 6 at 13:14
No. As I said, I already use a common Bash history.
– scriptfoo
Feb 6 at 13:27
So you did, sorry.
– Jimbo
Feb 6 at 13:30
add a comment |
1
Does this help? superuser.com/questions/211966/…
– Jimbo
Feb 6 at 13:14
No. As I said, I already use a common Bash history.
– scriptfoo
Feb 6 at 13:27
So you did, sorry.
– Jimbo
Feb 6 at 13:30
1
1
Does this help? superuser.com/questions/211966/…
– Jimbo
Feb 6 at 13:14
Does this help? superuser.com/questions/211966/…
– Jimbo
Feb 6 at 13:14
No. As I said, I already use a common Bash history.
– scriptfoo
Feb 6 at 13:27
No. As I said, I already use a common Bash history.
– scriptfoo
Feb 6 at 13:27
So you did, sorry.
– Jimbo
Feb 6 at 13:30
So you did, sorry.
– Jimbo
Feb 6 at 13:30
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "3"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1402661%2fwhy-bash-does-not-scan-all-of-its-own-history-file%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1402661%2fwhy-bash-does-not-scan-all-of-its-own-history-file%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Does this help? superuser.com/questions/211966/…
– Jimbo
Feb 6 at 13:14
No. As I said, I already use a common Bash history.
– scriptfoo
Feb 6 at 13:27
So you did, sorry.
– Jimbo
Feb 6 at 13:30