Route so that AWS instance appears on internal network and vice-versa
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}
I have an AWS Lightsail instance
- to which I'd like route all traffic from my network directed to a specific (i.e.: 192.168.1.225) IP address
- and from which I'd like to route all traffic directed to 192.168.1.0/24 via my public IP
I've been trying via iptables NAT but this doesn't seem to work either way:
# on my router
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -d 192.168.1.225 -j DNAT --to-destination $AWS_ADDRESS
iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s $AWS_ADDRESS -j SNAT --to-source 192.168.1.225
and
# on lightsail
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -d 192.168.1.144 -j DNAT --to-destination $PUBLIC_IP
iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s $PUBLIC_IP -j SNAT --to-source 192.168.1.144
What am I doing wrong here?
iptables amazon-web-services
add a comment |
I have an AWS Lightsail instance
- to which I'd like route all traffic from my network directed to a specific (i.e.: 192.168.1.225) IP address
- and from which I'd like to route all traffic directed to 192.168.1.0/24 via my public IP
I've been trying via iptables NAT but this doesn't seem to work either way:
# on my router
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -d 192.168.1.225 -j DNAT --to-destination $AWS_ADDRESS
iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s $AWS_ADDRESS -j SNAT --to-source 192.168.1.225
and
# on lightsail
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -d 192.168.1.144 -j DNAT --to-destination $PUBLIC_IP
iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s $PUBLIC_IP -j SNAT --to-source 192.168.1.144
What am I doing wrong here?
iptables amazon-web-services
add a comment |
I have an AWS Lightsail instance
- to which I'd like route all traffic from my network directed to a specific (i.e.: 192.168.1.225) IP address
- and from which I'd like to route all traffic directed to 192.168.1.0/24 via my public IP
I've been trying via iptables NAT but this doesn't seem to work either way:
# on my router
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -d 192.168.1.225 -j DNAT --to-destination $AWS_ADDRESS
iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s $AWS_ADDRESS -j SNAT --to-source 192.168.1.225
and
# on lightsail
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -d 192.168.1.144 -j DNAT --to-destination $PUBLIC_IP
iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s $PUBLIC_IP -j SNAT --to-source 192.168.1.144
What am I doing wrong here?
iptables amazon-web-services
I have an AWS Lightsail instance
- to which I'd like route all traffic from my network directed to a specific (i.e.: 192.168.1.225) IP address
- and from which I'd like to route all traffic directed to 192.168.1.0/24 via my public IP
I've been trying via iptables NAT but this doesn't seem to work either way:
# on my router
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -d 192.168.1.225 -j DNAT --to-destination $AWS_ADDRESS
iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s $AWS_ADDRESS -j SNAT --to-source 192.168.1.225
and
# on lightsail
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -d 192.168.1.144 -j DNAT --to-destination $PUBLIC_IP
iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s $PUBLIC_IP -j SNAT --to-source 192.168.1.144
What am I doing wrong here?
iptables amazon-web-services
iptables amazon-web-services
asked Feb 10 at 16:17
simonesimone
1215
1215
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Have you considered/tried using ssh with port forwarding? I think you can only expect to forward a few ports, but this seems like exactly what it would do for you.
add a comment |
First problem: You are trying to use an address which is local to your subnet. Same-subnet traffic does not go through the router and is not affected by the router's firewall rules. When other computers in your LAN want to reach 192.168.1.225
, they instead immediately send local ARP queries to learn its MAC address.
This can be avoided by using a different subnet for the AWS host, or by configuring Proxy-ARP on the router, making it spoof the ARP responses for that address.
Second problem: IP packets can only carry one destination, so DNAT loses information – the recipient (your local router) no longer knows what the original destination was supposed to be. (Only the same host which performed the translation has this information.) So the AWS host can DNAT a single destination to your local public address, but cannot DNAT a whole /24.
To avoid this, you need to tunnel the packets – instead of translating them, encapsulate the original packet within a second IP header. (Also called a VPN.) There are many options for configuring a tunnel on Linux, from plain IPIP or GRE to IPsec to WireGuard or Tinc or OpenVPN.
Most tunnel/VPN types are L3 (they carry IP packets inside), so you will still need to use a different subnet number from the regular LAN subnet, and have the router actually route between LAN interface and VPN/tunnel interface.
Some tunnels support L2 mode (carry Ethernet frames inside), e.g. EoIP, gretap, OpenVPN --dev-type tap, ZeroTier. These L2 tunnel interfaces can be bridged with your LAN, allowing the same subnet to be used on both sides (with fully working ARP), which is what you originally asked for.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "3"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1404175%2froute-so-that-aws-instance-appears-on-internal-network-and-vice-versa%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Have you considered/tried using ssh with port forwarding? I think you can only expect to forward a few ports, but this seems like exactly what it would do for you.
add a comment |
Have you considered/tried using ssh with port forwarding? I think you can only expect to forward a few ports, but this seems like exactly what it would do for you.
add a comment |
Have you considered/tried using ssh with port forwarding? I think you can only expect to forward a few ports, but this seems like exactly what it would do for you.
Have you considered/tried using ssh with port forwarding? I think you can only expect to forward a few ports, but this seems like exactly what it would do for you.
answered Feb 10 at 16:43
Toby EggittToby Eggitt
1074
1074
add a comment |
add a comment |
First problem: You are trying to use an address which is local to your subnet. Same-subnet traffic does not go through the router and is not affected by the router's firewall rules. When other computers in your LAN want to reach 192.168.1.225
, they instead immediately send local ARP queries to learn its MAC address.
This can be avoided by using a different subnet for the AWS host, or by configuring Proxy-ARP on the router, making it spoof the ARP responses for that address.
Second problem: IP packets can only carry one destination, so DNAT loses information – the recipient (your local router) no longer knows what the original destination was supposed to be. (Only the same host which performed the translation has this information.) So the AWS host can DNAT a single destination to your local public address, but cannot DNAT a whole /24.
To avoid this, you need to tunnel the packets – instead of translating them, encapsulate the original packet within a second IP header. (Also called a VPN.) There are many options for configuring a tunnel on Linux, from plain IPIP or GRE to IPsec to WireGuard or Tinc or OpenVPN.
Most tunnel/VPN types are L3 (they carry IP packets inside), so you will still need to use a different subnet number from the regular LAN subnet, and have the router actually route between LAN interface and VPN/tunnel interface.
Some tunnels support L2 mode (carry Ethernet frames inside), e.g. EoIP, gretap, OpenVPN --dev-type tap, ZeroTier. These L2 tunnel interfaces can be bridged with your LAN, allowing the same subnet to be used on both sides (with fully working ARP), which is what you originally asked for.
add a comment |
First problem: You are trying to use an address which is local to your subnet. Same-subnet traffic does not go through the router and is not affected by the router's firewall rules. When other computers in your LAN want to reach 192.168.1.225
, they instead immediately send local ARP queries to learn its MAC address.
This can be avoided by using a different subnet for the AWS host, or by configuring Proxy-ARP on the router, making it spoof the ARP responses for that address.
Second problem: IP packets can only carry one destination, so DNAT loses information – the recipient (your local router) no longer knows what the original destination was supposed to be. (Only the same host which performed the translation has this information.) So the AWS host can DNAT a single destination to your local public address, but cannot DNAT a whole /24.
To avoid this, you need to tunnel the packets – instead of translating them, encapsulate the original packet within a second IP header. (Also called a VPN.) There are many options for configuring a tunnel on Linux, from plain IPIP or GRE to IPsec to WireGuard or Tinc or OpenVPN.
Most tunnel/VPN types are L3 (they carry IP packets inside), so you will still need to use a different subnet number from the regular LAN subnet, and have the router actually route between LAN interface and VPN/tunnel interface.
Some tunnels support L2 mode (carry Ethernet frames inside), e.g. EoIP, gretap, OpenVPN --dev-type tap, ZeroTier. These L2 tunnel interfaces can be bridged with your LAN, allowing the same subnet to be used on both sides (with fully working ARP), which is what you originally asked for.
add a comment |
First problem: You are trying to use an address which is local to your subnet. Same-subnet traffic does not go through the router and is not affected by the router's firewall rules. When other computers in your LAN want to reach 192.168.1.225
, they instead immediately send local ARP queries to learn its MAC address.
This can be avoided by using a different subnet for the AWS host, or by configuring Proxy-ARP on the router, making it spoof the ARP responses for that address.
Second problem: IP packets can only carry one destination, so DNAT loses information – the recipient (your local router) no longer knows what the original destination was supposed to be. (Only the same host which performed the translation has this information.) So the AWS host can DNAT a single destination to your local public address, but cannot DNAT a whole /24.
To avoid this, you need to tunnel the packets – instead of translating them, encapsulate the original packet within a second IP header. (Also called a VPN.) There are many options for configuring a tunnel on Linux, from plain IPIP or GRE to IPsec to WireGuard or Tinc or OpenVPN.
Most tunnel/VPN types are L3 (they carry IP packets inside), so you will still need to use a different subnet number from the regular LAN subnet, and have the router actually route between LAN interface and VPN/tunnel interface.
Some tunnels support L2 mode (carry Ethernet frames inside), e.g. EoIP, gretap, OpenVPN --dev-type tap, ZeroTier. These L2 tunnel interfaces can be bridged with your LAN, allowing the same subnet to be used on both sides (with fully working ARP), which is what you originally asked for.
First problem: You are trying to use an address which is local to your subnet. Same-subnet traffic does not go through the router and is not affected by the router's firewall rules. When other computers in your LAN want to reach 192.168.1.225
, they instead immediately send local ARP queries to learn its MAC address.
This can be avoided by using a different subnet for the AWS host, or by configuring Proxy-ARP on the router, making it spoof the ARP responses for that address.
Second problem: IP packets can only carry one destination, so DNAT loses information – the recipient (your local router) no longer knows what the original destination was supposed to be. (Only the same host which performed the translation has this information.) So the AWS host can DNAT a single destination to your local public address, but cannot DNAT a whole /24.
To avoid this, you need to tunnel the packets – instead of translating them, encapsulate the original packet within a second IP header. (Also called a VPN.) There are many options for configuring a tunnel on Linux, from plain IPIP or GRE to IPsec to WireGuard or Tinc or OpenVPN.
Most tunnel/VPN types are L3 (they carry IP packets inside), so you will still need to use a different subnet number from the regular LAN subnet, and have the router actually route between LAN interface and VPN/tunnel interface.
Some tunnels support L2 mode (carry Ethernet frames inside), e.g. EoIP, gretap, OpenVPN --dev-type tap, ZeroTier. These L2 tunnel interfaces can be bridged with your LAN, allowing the same subnet to be used on both sides (with fully working ARP), which is what you originally asked for.
edited Feb 10 at 18:08
answered Feb 10 at 17:27
grawitygrawity
244k37515575
244k37515575
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1404175%2froute-so-that-aws-instance-appears-on-internal-network-and-vice-versa%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown