Given a list of coordinates, find the rectangle with minimal area





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







0












$begingroup$


A problem on leetcode asks the coder to write an algorithm to take a bunch of coordinates in the xy-plane and return the minimum area of a rectangle made from four of these coordinates (or return 0 if no four of these coordinates describe a rectangle). Admissible rectangles must have sides parallel to the coordinate axes.



I'd appreciate any comments and improvements on my code whatsoever. Of course some of them may not make sense in the context of Leetcode, and I mention such an example below. But they may still be good for me to be aware of. My code scores well among submissions on Leetcode, so I may have the right idea for the algorithm. I'm posting this code because I think it's decent, and I want to get a reality check if it's actually decent or not -- this is my first post on code review.



Leetcode asks the code to be a class called Solution with a method int minAreaRect(std::vector<std::vector<int>>& points), and they will test this code using this method. One effect of this is that it does no good (as far as I know) to make a constructor Solution::Solution(std::vector<std::vector<int>> &points), which would be the most natural. Therefore, for instance, I have to store points in my class as a pointer, not a reference, because I can't know what points is at construction time.



This problem seems to call for something like a multimap from x-coordinates to the set of y-coordinates for which (x,y) is in points. I chose to implement my own "flat multimap" -- since I am doing all my insertion at once, it seems better to just make a sorted vector, and so I just sorted the input vector. (The problem does not address whether I am allowed to modify the input vector -- if I were not allowed to, I would copy it and sort the copy.)



My code examines all possible pairs of distinct x-coordinates, and then looks for the overlap of the y-coordinates associated with them. If the intersection of their y-coordinates has less than two elements, there is no possible rectangle to be made from this pair of x-coordinates. Therefore the code bypasses x-coordinates that have fewer than two y-coordinates associated with them.



An example test case would look like this



int main ()
{
std::vector<std::vector<int>> v {{0,1}, {3,2}, {5, 5}, {4, 5}, {4,4}, {2,0}, {2, 3}, {2, 2}, {1, 0}, {5, 1}, {2, 5}, {5, 2}, {2, 4}, {4, 0}};
Solution sol;
std::cout << sol.minAreaRect(v);
return 0;
}


Outputs: 2, because (2,4), (2,5), (4,4), and (4,5) describe a rectangle of area two, and that is the best we can do.



My code uses two different comparators -- one which puts coordinates in lexicographic order, and one called comp_coords_fc_only which simply compares the first coordinate. The reason I made the second is so that I could call std::upper_bound(current_coord, points.end(), (*current_coord)[0], comp_coords_fc_only), which will take me to the next entry of points that has a different x-coordinate. I put this in a method called next_fc.



#include <vector>
#include <algorithm>
#include <iterator>
#include <iostream>

using coord_it = std::vector<std::vector<int>>::iterator;

bool comp_coords_lexic(const std::vector<int> &lhs, const std::vector<int> &rhs) {
if (lhs[0] != rhs[0])
return lhs[0] < rhs[0];
return lhs[1] < rhs[1];
}

bool comp_coords_fc_only(const std::vector<int> &lhs, const std::vector<int> &rhs) {
return (lhs[0] < rhs[0]);
}

class Solution {
//"fc" = "first coordinate" and "sc" = "second coordinate"
public:
int minAreaRect(std::vector<std::vector<int>>& _points) {

if (_points.size() < 4)
return 0;

std::sort(_points.begin(), _points.end(), comp_coords_lexic);

points = &_points;
int record_min_area = INT_MAX;

for (coord_it current_left_fc = _points.begin(); current_left_fc != _points.end(); current_left_fc = next_fc(current_left_fc)) {
if (has_less_than_two(current_left_fc))
continue;

for (coord_it current_right_fc = next_fc(current_left_fc); current_right_fc != _points.end(); current_right_fc = next_fc(current_right_fc)) {
if (has_less_than_two(current_right_fc))
continue;

int distance_fc = (*current_right_fc)[0] - (*current_left_fc)[0];

if (distance_fc > record_min_area)
continue; // need not explore first coords that are so far apart the area would necessarily be too big.

int min_distance_sc = min_distance_shared_scs(current_left_fc, current_right_fc);

if (min_distance_sc == 0)
continue; // if they don't have two scs in common

record_min_area = std::min(record_min_area, distance_fc * min_distance_sc);
} // for loop, right fc
} // for loop, left fc

if (record_min_area == INT_MAX)
return 0;
return record_min_area;
}

private:
int min_distance_shared_scs(coord_it beg_left_fc_range, coord_it beg_right_fc_range) {
// given two first coordinates (in the form of iterators pointing at the first entry
// with that first coordinate) x1 and x2, find min d(y1, y2) subject to (x1,y1), (x1, y2)
// (x2, y1), and (x2, y2) all being in the coordinate vector.

int last_match = INT_MIN; // sentinel value
int record_min_distance = INT_MAX;

auto upper_bound_left = next_fc(beg_left_fc_range), upper_bound_right = next_fc(beg_right_fc_range);
auto current_left_sc = beg_left_fc_range, current_right_sc = beg_right_fc_range;
while (current_left_sc != upper_bound_left && current_right_sc != upper_bound_right) {

if (equal_second_coord(current_left_sc, current_right_sc)) {

if (last_match == INT_MIN) {
last_match = (*current_left_sc)[1];
++current_left_sc; ++current_right_sc;
continue;
}

int distance_from_last = (*current_left_sc)[1] - last_match;
record_min_distance = std::min(record_min_distance, distance_from_last);
last_match = (*current_left_sc)[1];
++current_left_sc; ++current_right_sc;
continue;
}

if ((*current_left_sc)[1] < (*current_right_sc)[1])
++current_left_sc;
else
++current_right_sc;
} // while loop going through two ranges

if (record_min_distance == INT_MAX)
return 0;
return record_min_distance;
}

static bool equal_second_coord(coord_it it1, coord_it it2) {
return ((*it1)[1] == (*it2)[1]);
}

bool has_less_than_two(coord_it input_it) {
auto upper_bound = next_fc(input_it);
return (std::distance(input_it, upper_bound) < 2);
}

coord_it next_fc(coord_it it) {
return std::upper_bound(it, (*points).end(), *it, comp_coords_fc_only);
}

std::vector<std::vector<int>>* points;
};








share









New contributor




Eric Auld is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$



















    0












    $begingroup$


    A problem on leetcode asks the coder to write an algorithm to take a bunch of coordinates in the xy-plane and return the minimum area of a rectangle made from four of these coordinates (or return 0 if no four of these coordinates describe a rectangle). Admissible rectangles must have sides parallel to the coordinate axes.



    I'd appreciate any comments and improvements on my code whatsoever. Of course some of them may not make sense in the context of Leetcode, and I mention such an example below. But they may still be good for me to be aware of. My code scores well among submissions on Leetcode, so I may have the right idea for the algorithm. I'm posting this code because I think it's decent, and I want to get a reality check if it's actually decent or not -- this is my first post on code review.



    Leetcode asks the code to be a class called Solution with a method int minAreaRect(std::vector<std::vector<int>>& points), and they will test this code using this method. One effect of this is that it does no good (as far as I know) to make a constructor Solution::Solution(std::vector<std::vector<int>> &points), which would be the most natural. Therefore, for instance, I have to store points in my class as a pointer, not a reference, because I can't know what points is at construction time.



    This problem seems to call for something like a multimap from x-coordinates to the set of y-coordinates for which (x,y) is in points. I chose to implement my own "flat multimap" -- since I am doing all my insertion at once, it seems better to just make a sorted vector, and so I just sorted the input vector. (The problem does not address whether I am allowed to modify the input vector -- if I were not allowed to, I would copy it and sort the copy.)



    My code examines all possible pairs of distinct x-coordinates, and then looks for the overlap of the y-coordinates associated with them. If the intersection of their y-coordinates has less than two elements, there is no possible rectangle to be made from this pair of x-coordinates. Therefore the code bypasses x-coordinates that have fewer than two y-coordinates associated with them.



    An example test case would look like this



    int main ()
    {
    std::vector<std::vector<int>> v {{0,1}, {3,2}, {5, 5}, {4, 5}, {4,4}, {2,0}, {2, 3}, {2, 2}, {1, 0}, {5, 1}, {2, 5}, {5, 2}, {2, 4}, {4, 0}};
    Solution sol;
    std::cout << sol.minAreaRect(v);
    return 0;
    }


    Outputs: 2, because (2,4), (2,5), (4,4), and (4,5) describe a rectangle of area two, and that is the best we can do.



    My code uses two different comparators -- one which puts coordinates in lexicographic order, and one called comp_coords_fc_only which simply compares the first coordinate. The reason I made the second is so that I could call std::upper_bound(current_coord, points.end(), (*current_coord)[0], comp_coords_fc_only), which will take me to the next entry of points that has a different x-coordinate. I put this in a method called next_fc.



    #include <vector>
    #include <algorithm>
    #include <iterator>
    #include <iostream>

    using coord_it = std::vector<std::vector<int>>::iterator;

    bool comp_coords_lexic(const std::vector<int> &lhs, const std::vector<int> &rhs) {
    if (lhs[0] != rhs[0])
    return lhs[0] < rhs[0];
    return lhs[1] < rhs[1];
    }

    bool comp_coords_fc_only(const std::vector<int> &lhs, const std::vector<int> &rhs) {
    return (lhs[0] < rhs[0]);
    }

    class Solution {
    //"fc" = "first coordinate" and "sc" = "second coordinate"
    public:
    int minAreaRect(std::vector<std::vector<int>>& _points) {

    if (_points.size() < 4)
    return 0;

    std::sort(_points.begin(), _points.end(), comp_coords_lexic);

    points = &_points;
    int record_min_area = INT_MAX;

    for (coord_it current_left_fc = _points.begin(); current_left_fc != _points.end(); current_left_fc = next_fc(current_left_fc)) {
    if (has_less_than_two(current_left_fc))
    continue;

    for (coord_it current_right_fc = next_fc(current_left_fc); current_right_fc != _points.end(); current_right_fc = next_fc(current_right_fc)) {
    if (has_less_than_two(current_right_fc))
    continue;

    int distance_fc = (*current_right_fc)[0] - (*current_left_fc)[0];

    if (distance_fc > record_min_area)
    continue; // need not explore first coords that are so far apart the area would necessarily be too big.

    int min_distance_sc = min_distance_shared_scs(current_left_fc, current_right_fc);

    if (min_distance_sc == 0)
    continue; // if they don't have two scs in common

    record_min_area = std::min(record_min_area, distance_fc * min_distance_sc);
    } // for loop, right fc
    } // for loop, left fc

    if (record_min_area == INT_MAX)
    return 0;
    return record_min_area;
    }

    private:
    int min_distance_shared_scs(coord_it beg_left_fc_range, coord_it beg_right_fc_range) {
    // given two first coordinates (in the form of iterators pointing at the first entry
    // with that first coordinate) x1 and x2, find min d(y1, y2) subject to (x1,y1), (x1, y2)
    // (x2, y1), and (x2, y2) all being in the coordinate vector.

    int last_match = INT_MIN; // sentinel value
    int record_min_distance = INT_MAX;

    auto upper_bound_left = next_fc(beg_left_fc_range), upper_bound_right = next_fc(beg_right_fc_range);
    auto current_left_sc = beg_left_fc_range, current_right_sc = beg_right_fc_range;
    while (current_left_sc != upper_bound_left && current_right_sc != upper_bound_right) {

    if (equal_second_coord(current_left_sc, current_right_sc)) {

    if (last_match == INT_MIN) {
    last_match = (*current_left_sc)[1];
    ++current_left_sc; ++current_right_sc;
    continue;
    }

    int distance_from_last = (*current_left_sc)[1] - last_match;
    record_min_distance = std::min(record_min_distance, distance_from_last);
    last_match = (*current_left_sc)[1];
    ++current_left_sc; ++current_right_sc;
    continue;
    }

    if ((*current_left_sc)[1] < (*current_right_sc)[1])
    ++current_left_sc;
    else
    ++current_right_sc;
    } // while loop going through two ranges

    if (record_min_distance == INT_MAX)
    return 0;
    return record_min_distance;
    }

    static bool equal_second_coord(coord_it it1, coord_it it2) {
    return ((*it1)[1] == (*it2)[1]);
    }

    bool has_less_than_two(coord_it input_it) {
    auto upper_bound = next_fc(input_it);
    return (std::distance(input_it, upper_bound) < 2);
    }

    coord_it next_fc(coord_it it) {
    return std::upper_bound(it, (*points).end(), *it, comp_coords_fc_only);
    }

    std::vector<std::vector<int>>* points;
    };








    share









    New contributor




    Eric Auld is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.







    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      A problem on leetcode asks the coder to write an algorithm to take a bunch of coordinates in the xy-plane and return the minimum area of a rectangle made from four of these coordinates (or return 0 if no four of these coordinates describe a rectangle). Admissible rectangles must have sides parallel to the coordinate axes.



      I'd appreciate any comments and improvements on my code whatsoever. Of course some of them may not make sense in the context of Leetcode, and I mention such an example below. But they may still be good for me to be aware of. My code scores well among submissions on Leetcode, so I may have the right idea for the algorithm. I'm posting this code because I think it's decent, and I want to get a reality check if it's actually decent or not -- this is my first post on code review.



      Leetcode asks the code to be a class called Solution with a method int minAreaRect(std::vector<std::vector<int>>& points), and they will test this code using this method. One effect of this is that it does no good (as far as I know) to make a constructor Solution::Solution(std::vector<std::vector<int>> &points), which would be the most natural. Therefore, for instance, I have to store points in my class as a pointer, not a reference, because I can't know what points is at construction time.



      This problem seems to call for something like a multimap from x-coordinates to the set of y-coordinates for which (x,y) is in points. I chose to implement my own "flat multimap" -- since I am doing all my insertion at once, it seems better to just make a sorted vector, and so I just sorted the input vector. (The problem does not address whether I am allowed to modify the input vector -- if I were not allowed to, I would copy it and sort the copy.)



      My code examines all possible pairs of distinct x-coordinates, and then looks for the overlap of the y-coordinates associated with them. If the intersection of their y-coordinates has less than two elements, there is no possible rectangle to be made from this pair of x-coordinates. Therefore the code bypasses x-coordinates that have fewer than two y-coordinates associated with them.



      An example test case would look like this



      int main ()
      {
      std::vector<std::vector<int>> v {{0,1}, {3,2}, {5, 5}, {4, 5}, {4,4}, {2,0}, {2, 3}, {2, 2}, {1, 0}, {5, 1}, {2, 5}, {5, 2}, {2, 4}, {4, 0}};
      Solution sol;
      std::cout << sol.minAreaRect(v);
      return 0;
      }


      Outputs: 2, because (2,4), (2,5), (4,4), and (4,5) describe a rectangle of area two, and that is the best we can do.



      My code uses two different comparators -- one which puts coordinates in lexicographic order, and one called comp_coords_fc_only which simply compares the first coordinate. The reason I made the second is so that I could call std::upper_bound(current_coord, points.end(), (*current_coord)[0], comp_coords_fc_only), which will take me to the next entry of points that has a different x-coordinate. I put this in a method called next_fc.



      #include <vector>
      #include <algorithm>
      #include <iterator>
      #include <iostream>

      using coord_it = std::vector<std::vector<int>>::iterator;

      bool comp_coords_lexic(const std::vector<int> &lhs, const std::vector<int> &rhs) {
      if (lhs[0] != rhs[0])
      return lhs[0] < rhs[0];
      return lhs[1] < rhs[1];
      }

      bool comp_coords_fc_only(const std::vector<int> &lhs, const std::vector<int> &rhs) {
      return (lhs[0] < rhs[0]);
      }

      class Solution {
      //"fc" = "first coordinate" and "sc" = "second coordinate"
      public:
      int minAreaRect(std::vector<std::vector<int>>& _points) {

      if (_points.size() < 4)
      return 0;

      std::sort(_points.begin(), _points.end(), comp_coords_lexic);

      points = &_points;
      int record_min_area = INT_MAX;

      for (coord_it current_left_fc = _points.begin(); current_left_fc != _points.end(); current_left_fc = next_fc(current_left_fc)) {
      if (has_less_than_two(current_left_fc))
      continue;

      for (coord_it current_right_fc = next_fc(current_left_fc); current_right_fc != _points.end(); current_right_fc = next_fc(current_right_fc)) {
      if (has_less_than_two(current_right_fc))
      continue;

      int distance_fc = (*current_right_fc)[0] - (*current_left_fc)[0];

      if (distance_fc > record_min_area)
      continue; // need not explore first coords that are so far apart the area would necessarily be too big.

      int min_distance_sc = min_distance_shared_scs(current_left_fc, current_right_fc);

      if (min_distance_sc == 0)
      continue; // if they don't have two scs in common

      record_min_area = std::min(record_min_area, distance_fc * min_distance_sc);
      } // for loop, right fc
      } // for loop, left fc

      if (record_min_area == INT_MAX)
      return 0;
      return record_min_area;
      }

      private:
      int min_distance_shared_scs(coord_it beg_left_fc_range, coord_it beg_right_fc_range) {
      // given two first coordinates (in the form of iterators pointing at the first entry
      // with that first coordinate) x1 and x2, find min d(y1, y2) subject to (x1,y1), (x1, y2)
      // (x2, y1), and (x2, y2) all being in the coordinate vector.

      int last_match = INT_MIN; // sentinel value
      int record_min_distance = INT_MAX;

      auto upper_bound_left = next_fc(beg_left_fc_range), upper_bound_right = next_fc(beg_right_fc_range);
      auto current_left_sc = beg_left_fc_range, current_right_sc = beg_right_fc_range;
      while (current_left_sc != upper_bound_left && current_right_sc != upper_bound_right) {

      if (equal_second_coord(current_left_sc, current_right_sc)) {

      if (last_match == INT_MIN) {
      last_match = (*current_left_sc)[1];
      ++current_left_sc; ++current_right_sc;
      continue;
      }

      int distance_from_last = (*current_left_sc)[1] - last_match;
      record_min_distance = std::min(record_min_distance, distance_from_last);
      last_match = (*current_left_sc)[1];
      ++current_left_sc; ++current_right_sc;
      continue;
      }

      if ((*current_left_sc)[1] < (*current_right_sc)[1])
      ++current_left_sc;
      else
      ++current_right_sc;
      } // while loop going through two ranges

      if (record_min_distance == INT_MAX)
      return 0;
      return record_min_distance;
      }

      static bool equal_second_coord(coord_it it1, coord_it it2) {
      return ((*it1)[1] == (*it2)[1]);
      }

      bool has_less_than_two(coord_it input_it) {
      auto upper_bound = next_fc(input_it);
      return (std::distance(input_it, upper_bound) < 2);
      }

      coord_it next_fc(coord_it it) {
      return std::upper_bound(it, (*points).end(), *it, comp_coords_fc_only);
      }

      std::vector<std::vector<int>>* points;
      };








      share









      New contributor




      Eric Auld is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.







      $endgroup$




      A problem on leetcode asks the coder to write an algorithm to take a bunch of coordinates in the xy-plane and return the minimum area of a rectangle made from four of these coordinates (or return 0 if no four of these coordinates describe a rectangle). Admissible rectangles must have sides parallel to the coordinate axes.



      I'd appreciate any comments and improvements on my code whatsoever. Of course some of them may not make sense in the context of Leetcode, and I mention such an example below. But they may still be good for me to be aware of. My code scores well among submissions on Leetcode, so I may have the right idea for the algorithm. I'm posting this code because I think it's decent, and I want to get a reality check if it's actually decent or not -- this is my first post on code review.



      Leetcode asks the code to be a class called Solution with a method int minAreaRect(std::vector<std::vector<int>>& points), and they will test this code using this method. One effect of this is that it does no good (as far as I know) to make a constructor Solution::Solution(std::vector<std::vector<int>> &points), which would be the most natural. Therefore, for instance, I have to store points in my class as a pointer, not a reference, because I can't know what points is at construction time.



      This problem seems to call for something like a multimap from x-coordinates to the set of y-coordinates for which (x,y) is in points. I chose to implement my own "flat multimap" -- since I am doing all my insertion at once, it seems better to just make a sorted vector, and so I just sorted the input vector. (The problem does not address whether I am allowed to modify the input vector -- if I were not allowed to, I would copy it and sort the copy.)



      My code examines all possible pairs of distinct x-coordinates, and then looks for the overlap of the y-coordinates associated with them. If the intersection of their y-coordinates has less than two elements, there is no possible rectangle to be made from this pair of x-coordinates. Therefore the code bypasses x-coordinates that have fewer than two y-coordinates associated with them.



      An example test case would look like this



      int main ()
      {
      std::vector<std::vector<int>> v {{0,1}, {3,2}, {5, 5}, {4, 5}, {4,4}, {2,0}, {2, 3}, {2, 2}, {1, 0}, {5, 1}, {2, 5}, {5, 2}, {2, 4}, {4, 0}};
      Solution sol;
      std::cout << sol.minAreaRect(v);
      return 0;
      }


      Outputs: 2, because (2,4), (2,5), (4,4), and (4,5) describe a rectangle of area two, and that is the best we can do.



      My code uses two different comparators -- one which puts coordinates in lexicographic order, and one called comp_coords_fc_only which simply compares the first coordinate. The reason I made the second is so that I could call std::upper_bound(current_coord, points.end(), (*current_coord)[0], comp_coords_fc_only), which will take me to the next entry of points that has a different x-coordinate. I put this in a method called next_fc.



      #include <vector>
      #include <algorithm>
      #include <iterator>
      #include <iostream>

      using coord_it = std::vector<std::vector<int>>::iterator;

      bool comp_coords_lexic(const std::vector<int> &lhs, const std::vector<int> &rhs) {
      if (lhs[0] != rhs[0])
      return lhs[0] < rhs[0];
      return lhs[1] < rhs[1];
      }

      bool comp_coords_fc_only(const std::vector<int> &lhs, const std::vector<int> &rhs) {
      return (lhs[0] < rhs[0]);
      }

      class Solution {
      //"fc" = "first coordinate" and "sc" = "second coordinate"
      public:
      int minAreaRect(std::vector<std::vector<int>>& _points) {

      if (_points.size() < 4)
      return 0;

      std::sort(_points.begin(), _points.end(), comp_coords_lexic);

      points = &_points;
      int record_min_area = INT_MAX;

      for (coord_it current_left_fc = _points.begin(); current_left_fc != _points.end(); current_left_fc = next_fc(current_left_fc)) {
      if (has_less_than_two(current_left_fc))
      continue;

      for (coord_it current_right_fc = next_fc(current_left_fc); current_right_fc != _points.end(); current_right_fc = next_fc(current_right_fc)) {
      if (has_less_than_two(current_right_fc))
      continue;

      int distance_fc = (*current_right_fc)[0] - (*current_left_fc)[0];

      if (distance_fc > record_min_area)
      continue; // need not explore first coords that are so far apart the area would necessarily be too big.

      int min_distance_sc = min_distance_shared_scs(current_left_fc, current_right_fc);

      if (min_distance_sc == 0)
      continue; // if they don't have two scs in common

      record_min_area = std::min(record_min_area, distance_fc * min_distance_sc);
      } // for loop, right fc
      } // for loop, left fc

      if (record_min_area == INT_MAX)
      return 0;
      return record_min_area;
      }

      private:
      int min_distance_shared_scs(coord_it beg_left_fc_range, coord_it beg_right_fc_range) {
      // given two first coordinates (in the form of iterators pointing at the first entry
      // with that first coordinate) x1 and x2, find min d(y1, y2) subject to (x1,y1), (x1, y2)
      // (x2, y1), and (x2, y2) all being in the coordinate vector.

      int last_match = INT_MIN; // sentinel value
      int record_min_distance = INT_MAX;

      auto upper_bound_left = next_fc(beg_left_fc_range), upper_bound_right = next_fc(beg_right_fc_range);
      auto current_left_sc = beg_left_fc_range, current_right_sc = beg_right_fc_range;
      while (current_left_sc != upper_bound_left && current_right_sc != upper_bound_right) {

      if (equal_second_coord(current_left_sc, current_right_sc)) {

      if (last_match == INT_MIN) {
      last_match = (*current_left_sc)[1];
      ++current_left_sc; ++current_right_sc;
      continue;
      }

      int distance_from_last = (*current_left_sc)[1] - last_match;
      record_min_distance = std::min(record_min_distance, distance_from_last);
      last_match = (*current_left_sc)[1];
      ++current_left_sc; ++current_right_sc;
      continue;
      }

      if ((*current_left_sc)[1] < (*current_right_sc)[1])
      ++current_left_sc;
      else
      ++current_right_sc;
      } // while loop going through two ranges

      if (record_min_distance == INT_MAX)
      return 0;
      return record_min_distance;
      }

      static bool equal_second_coord(coord_it it1, coord_it it2) {
      return ((*it1)[1] == (*it2)[1]);
      }

      bool has_less_than_two(coord_it input_it) {
      auto upper_bound = next_fc(input_it);
      return (std::distance(input_it, upper_bound) < 2);
      }

      coord_it next_fc(coord_it it) {
      return std::upper_bound(it, (*points).end(), *it, comp_coords_fc_only);
      }

      std::vector<std::vector<int>>* points;
      };






      c++





      share









      New contributor




      Eric Auld is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.










      share









      New contributor




      Eric Auld is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.








      share



      share








      edited 1 min ago







      Eric Auld













      New contributor




      Eric Auld is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 8 mins ago









      Eric AuldEric Auld

      1011




      1011




      New contributor




      Eric Auld is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Eric Auld is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Eric Auld is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes












          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "196"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });






          Eric Auld is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f217465%2fgiven-a-list-of-coordinates-find-the-rectangle-with-minimal-area%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          Eric Auld is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          Eric Auld is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













          Eric Auld is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












          Eric Auld is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















          Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f217465%2fgiven-a-list-of-coordinates-find-the-rectangle-with-minimal-area%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Terni

          A new problem with tex4ht and tikz

          Sun Ra