Was there a “secret” recording of the American founding fathers' deliberations?
I remember that there was someone who wrote down the stuff the founding fathers talked about behind closed doors. Can't remember his name. Who was he again?
united-states founding-fathers
add a comment |
I remember that there was someone who wrote down the stuff the founding fathers talked about behind closed doors. Can't remember his name. Who was he again?
united-states founding-fathers
21
You remember? Goodness, you must be old.
– RedSonja
Dec 18 '18 at 11:36
2
I think it was Rittenhouse, from Timeless. When it comes to keeping minutes, who better than a clockmaker?
– Walter Mitty
Dec 18 '18 at 15:51
@WalterMitty - I'll second that.
– Don Branson
Dec 18 '18 at 23:37
I could tell you but I'd have to kill you as it's that secret.
– jwenting
2 days ago
add a comment |
I remember that there was someone who wrote down the stuff the founding fathers talked about behind closed doors. Can't remember his name. Who was he again?
united-states founding-fathers
I remember that there was someone who wrote down the stuff the founding fathers talked about behind closed doors. Can't remember his name. Who was he again?
united-states founding-fathers
united-states founding-fathers
edited Dec 18 '18 at 10:17
Mark C. Wallace♦
23.4k972111
23.4k972111
asked Dec 18 '18 at 5:19
user1050755user1050755
19615
19615
21
You remember? Goodness, you must be old.
– RedSonja
Dec 18 '18 at 11:36
2
I think it was Rittenhouse, from Timeless. When it comes to keeping minutes, who better than a clockmaker?
– Walter Mitty
Dec 18 '18 at 15:51
@WalterMitty - I'll second that.
– Don Branson
Dec 18 '18 at 23:37
I could tell you but I'd have to kill you as it's that secret.
– jwenting
2 days ago
add a comment |
21
You remember? Goodness, you must be old.
– RedSonja
Dec 18 '18 at 11:36
2
I think it was Rittenhouse, from Timeless. When it comes to keeping minutes, who better than a clockmaker?
– Walter Mitty
Dec 18 '18 at 15:51
@WalterMitty - I'll second that.
– Don Branson
Dec 18 '18 at 23:37
I could tell you but I'd have to kill you as it's that secret.
– jwenting
2 days ago
21
21
You remember? Goodness, you must be old.
– RedSonja
Dec 18 '18 at 11:36
You remember? Goodness, you must be old.
– RedSonja
Dec 18 '18 at 11:36
2
2
I think it was Rittenhouse, from Timeless. When it comes to keeping minutes, who better than a clockmaker?
– Walter Mitty
Dec 18 '18 at 15:51
I think it was Rittenhouse, from Timeless. When it comes to keeping minutes, who better than a clockmaker?
– Walter Mitty
Dec 18 '18 at 15:51
@WalterMitty - I'll second that.
– Don Branson
Dec 18 '18 at 23:37
@WalterMitty - I'll second that.
– Don Branson
Dec 18 '18 at 23:37
I could tell you but I'd have to kill you as it's that secret.
– jwenting
2 days ago
I could tell you but I'd have to kill you as it's that secret.
– jwenting
2 days ago
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
Assuming you are talking about the Constitutional Convention...
It wasn't a "secret", but I suppose it is conveniently ignored by a lot of people that there were extensive records kept of the deliberations. They were delivered by the convention secretary to the convention "president" (George Washington, of course). Congress ordered them all printed in 1819.
Max Farrand in 1911 compiled them all and reprinted them together (in multiple volumes) as The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787.
I haven't read them myself directly, but they were from multiple sources, not just official proceedings notes. According to the link above, aside from the official notes the largest amount of material in there was written by James Madison. From the secondary sources I've read, it seems like rather a lot of the material in there was originally written by Alexander Hamilton as well.
I think that's what I remembered. I first heard about it on Thom Hartmann's program over at youtube - he sometimes reads interesting history related stuff.
– user1050755
Dec 18 '18 at 7:07
add a comment |
In 2011, the New York Historical Society acquired the Constitutional Convention notebooks of John Lansing, Jr., a New York delegate to the 1787 Philadelphia Convention. According to this announcement:
The delegates’ vow of secrecy, which banned the taking of notes for publication, limited the amount of material created documenting the Convention proceedings. Although notes by a number of other delegates, including James Madison, survive, Lansing’s are among the purest and most detailed, providing a unique and unedited first-hand account of the period of Lansing’s attendance at the Convention.
The society also holds the notes of Massachusetts delegate Rufus King, and has on deposit those of South Carolinian Pierce Butler.
add a comment |
You are likely thinking of The Federalist Papers (Wikipedia here),
Beginning on October 27, 1787 the Federalist Papers were first published in the New York press under the signature of "Publius". These papers are generally considered to be one of the most important contributions to political thought made in America.
The papers were actually written by James Madison, Alexander Hamilton and John Jay, all under the single pseudonym Publius as noted above. They were never secret, and were published as they were written as part of the campaign to achieve ratification of the Constitution.
1
I remember there were some meetings behind closed windows etc., pretty secretive. Maybe deliberations about the declaration of independence?
– user1050755
Dec 18 '18 at 5:46
2
@user1050755: Nope - worst kept secret in history: "In the campaign to revise Congressional instructions [to enable a declaration of independence], many Americans formally expressed their support for separation from Great Britain in what were effectively state and local declarations of independence. Historian Pauline Maier identifies more than ninety such declarations that were issued throughout the Thirteen Colonies from April to July 1776."
– Pieter Geerkens
Dec 18 '18 at 6:00
1
@user1050755 might be thinking of the constitution itself which seems to have been written in camera. (Revolutions podcast)
– Samuel Russell
Dec 18 '18 at 8:29
1
@SamuelRussell: Yep. I missed that possibility but T.E.D. picked it up.
– Pieter Geerkens
Dec 18 '18 at 8:51
The Federalist Papers were not recordings of deliberation. They were essentially pro-Constitution propaganda, and in most respects reflected the general arguments for a given provision, and did that very well, which is why they're a treasure of political thought.
– David Thornley
Dec 21 '18 at 18:45
add a comment |
Charles Thomson was the secretary of the Continental Congress from 1774 to 1789. In addition to keeping the official journals of the Congress, Thomson kept a number of private notes, which in later years he attempted to compile into a manuscript. This work, tentatively titled "Notes of the Intrigues and Severe Altercations or Quarrels in the Congress", reportedly reached over a thousand pages in length. Unfortunately for historians, Thomson eventually decided against publishing the manuscript, and instead destroyed it.
Nathaniel Philbrick wrote about Thomson and his manuscript in the preface to his book Valiant Ambition, which is how I learned about it.
New contributor
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "324"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fhistory.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f50204%2fwas-there-a-secret-recording-of-the-american-founding-fathers-deliberations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Assuming you are talking about the Constitutional Convention...
It wasn't a "secret", but I suppose it is conveniently ignored by a lot of people that there were extensive records kept of the deliberations. They were delivered by the convention secretary to the convention "president" (George Washington, of course). Congress ordered them all printed in 1819.
Max Farrand in 1911 compiled them all and reprinted them together (in multiple volumes) as The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787.
I haven't read them myself directly, but they were from multiple sources, not just official proceedings notes. According to the link above, aside from the official notes the largest amount of material in there was written by James Madison. From the secondary sources I've read, it seems like rather a lot of the material in there was originally written by Alexander Hamilton as well.
I think that's what I remembered. I first heard about it on Thom Hartmann's program over at youtube - he sometimes reads interesting history related stuff.
– user1050755
Dec 18 '18 at 7:07
add a comment |
Assuming you are talking about the Constitutional Convention...
It wasn't a "secret", but I suppose it is conveniently ignored by a lot of people that there were extensive records kept of the deliberations. They were delivered by the convention secretary to the convention "president" (George Washington, of course). Congress ordered them all printed in 1819.
Max Farrand in 1911 compiled them all and reprinted them together (in multiple volumes) as The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787.
I haven't read them myself directly, but they were from multiple sources, not just official proceedings notes. According to the link above, aside from the official notes the largest amount of material in there was written by James Madison. From the secondary sources I've read, it seems like rather a lot of the material in there was originally written by Alexander Hamilton as well.
I think that's what I remembered. I first heard about it on Thom Hartmann's program over at youtube - he sometimes reads interesting history related stuff.
– user1050755
Dec 18 '18 at 7:07
add a comment |
Assuming you are talking about the Constitutional Convention...
It wasn't a "secret", but I suppose it is conveniently ignored by a lot of people that there were extensive records kept of the deliberations. They were delivered by the convention secretary to the convention "president" (George Washington, of course). Congress ordered them all printed in 1819.
Max Farrand in 1911 compiled them all and reprinted them together (in multiple volumes) as The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787.
I haven't read them myself directly, but they were from multiple sources, not just official proceedings notes. According to the link above, aside from the official notes the largest amount of material in there was written by James Madison. From the secondary sources I've read, it seems like rather a lot of the material in there was originally written by Alexander Hamilton as well.
Assuming you are talking about the Constitutional Convention...
It wasn't a "secret", but I suppose it is conveniently ignored by a lot of people that there were extensive records kept of the deliberations. They were delivered by the convention secretary to the convention "president" (George Washington, of course). Congress ordered them all printed in 1819.
Max Farrand in 1911 compiled them all and reprinted them together (in multiple volumes) as The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787.
I haven't read them myself directly, but they were from multiple sources, not just official proceedings notes. According to the link above, aside from the official notes the largest amount of material in there was written by James Madison. From the secondary sources I've read, it seems like rather a lot of the material in there was originally written by Alexander Hamilton as well.
edited Dec 18 '18 at 6:33
answered Dec 18 '18 at 6:30
T.E.D.♦T.E.D.
74.3k10163302
74.3k10163302
I think that's what I remembered. I first heard about it on Thom Hartmann's program over at youtube - he sometimes reads interesting history related stuff.
– user1050755
Dec 18 '18 at 7:07
add a comment |
I think that's what I remembered. I first heard about it on Thom Hartmann's program over at youtube - he sometimes reads interesting history related stuff.
– user1050755
Dec 18 '18 at 7:07
I think that's what I remembered. I first heard about it on Thom Hartmann's program over at youtube - he sometimes reads interesting history related stuff.
– user1050755
Dec 18 '18 at 7:07
I think that's what I remembered. I first heard about it on Thom Hartmann's program over at youtube - he sometimes reads interesting history related stuff.
– user1050755
Dec 18 '18 at 7:07
add a comment |
In 2011, the New York Historical Society acquired the Constitutional Convention notebooks of John Lansing, Jr., a New York delegate to the 1787 Philadelphia Convention. According to this announcement:
The delegates’ vow of secrecy, which banned the taking of notes for publication, limited the amount of material created documenting the Convention proceedings. Although notes by a number of other delegates, including James Madison, survive, Lansing’s are among the purest and most detailed, providing a unique and unedited first-hand account of the period of Lansing’s attendance at the Convention.
The society also holds the notes of Massachusetts delegate Rufus King, and has on deposit those of South Carolinian Pierce Butler.
add a comment |
In 2011, the New York Historical Society acquired the Constitutional Convention notebooks of John Lansing, Jr., a New York delegate to the 1787 Philadelphia Convention. According to this announcement:
The delegates’ vow of secrecy, which banned the taking of notes for publication, limited the amount of material created documenting the Convention proceedings. Although notes by a number of other delegates, including James Madison, survive, Lansing’s are among the purest and most detailed, providing a unique and unedited first-hand account of the period of Lansing’s attendance at the Convention.
The society also holds the notes of Massachusetts delegate Rufus King, and has on deposit those of South Carolinian Pierce Butler.
add a comment |
In 2011, the New York Historical Society acquired the Constitutional Convention notebooks of John Lansing, Jr., a New York delegate to the 1787 Philadelphia Convention. According to this announcement:
The delegates’ vow of secrecy, which banned the taking of notes for publication, limited the amount of material created documenting the Convention proceedings. Although notes by a number of other delegates, including James Madison, survive, Lansing’s are among the purest and most detailed, providing a unique and unedited first-hand account of the period of Lansing’s attendance at the Convention.
The society also holds the notes of Massachusetts delegate Rufus King, and has on deposit those of South Carolinian Pierce Butler.
In 2011, the New York Historical Society acquired the Constitutional Convention notebooks of John Lansing, Jr., a New York delegate to the 1787 Philadelphia Convention. According to this announcement:
The delegates’ vow of secrecy, which banned the taking of notes for publication, limited the amount of material created documenting the Convention proceedings. Although notes by a number of other delegates, including James Madison, survive, Lansing’s are among the purest and most detailed, providing a unique and unedited first-hand account of the period of Lansing’s attendance at the Convention.
The society also holds the notes of Massachusetts delegate Rufus King, and has on deposit those of South Carolinian Pierce Butler.
answered Dec 18 '18 at 15:09
sdenhamsdenham
25316
25316
add a comment |
add a comment |
You are likely thinking of The Federalist Papers (Wikipedia here),
Beginning on October 27, 1787 the Federalist Papers were first published in the New York press under the signature of "Publius". These papers are generally considered to be one of the most important contributions to political thought made in America.
The papers were actually written by James Madison, Alexander Hamilton and John Jay, all under the single pseudonym Publius as noted above. They were never secret, and were published as they were written as part of the campaign to achieve ratification of the Constitution.
1
I remember there were some meetings behind closed windows etc., pretty secretive. Maybe deliberations about the declaration of independence?
– user1050755
Dec 18 '18 at 5:46
2
@user1050755: Nope - worst kept secret in history: "In the campaign to revise Congressional instructions [to enable a declaration of independence], many Americans formally expressed their support for separation from Great Britain in what were effectively state and local declarations of independence. Historian Pauline Maier identifies more than ninety such declarations that were issued throughout the Thirteen Colonies from April to July 1776."
– Pieter Geerkens
Dec 18 '18 at 6:00
1
@user1050755 might be thinking of the constitution itself which seems to have been written in camera. (Revolutions podcast)
– Samuel Russell
Dec 18 '18 at 8:29
1
@SamuelRussell: Yep. I missed that possibility but T.E.D. picked it up.
– Pieter Geerkens
Dec 18 '18 at 8:51
The Federalist Papers were not recordings of deliberation. They were essentially pro-Constitution propaganda, and in most respects reflected the general arguments for a given provision, and did that very well, which is why they're a treasure of political thought.
– David Thornley
Dec 21 '18 at 18:45
add a comment |
You are likely thinking of The Federalist Papers (Wikipedia here),
Beginning on October 27, 1787 the Federalist Papers were first published in the New York press under the signature of "Publius". These papers are generally considered to be one of the most important contributions to political thought made in America.
The papers were actually written by James Madison, Alexander Hamilton and John Jay, all under the single pseudonym Publius as noted above. They were never secret, and were published as they were written as part of the campaign to achieve ratification of the Constitution.
1
I remember there were some meetings behind closed windows etc., pretty secretive. Maybe deliberations about the declaration of independence?
– user1050755
Dec 18 '18 at 5:46
2
@user1050755: Nope - worst kept secret in history: "In the campaign to revise Congressional instructions [to enable a declaration of independence], many Americans formally expressed their support for separation from Great Britain in what were effectively state and local declarations of independence. Historian Pauline Maier identifies more than ninety such declarations that were issued throughout the Thirteen Colonies from April to July 1776."
– Pieter Geerkens
Dec 18 '18 at 6:00
1
@user1050755 might be thinking of the constitution itself which seems to have been written in camera. (Revolutions podcast)
– Samuel Russell
Dec 18 '18 at 8:29
1
@SamuelRussell: Yep. I missed that possibility but T.E.D. picked it up.
– Pieter Geerkens
Dec 18 '18 at 8:51
The Federalist Papers were not recordings of deliberation. They were essentially pro-Constitution propaganda, and in most respects reflected the general arguments for a given provision, and did that very well, which is why they're a treasure of political thought.
– David Thornley
Dec 21 '18 at 18:45
add a comment |
You are likely thinking of The Federalist Papers (Wikipedia here),
Beginning on October 27, 1787 the Federalist Papers were first published in the New York press under the signature of "Publius". These papers are generally considered to be one of the most important contributions to political thought made in America.
The papers were actually written by James Madison, Alexander Hamilton and John Jay, all under the single pseudonym Publius as noted above. They were never secret, and were published as they were written as part of the campaign to achieve ratification of the Constitution.
You are likely thinking of The Federalist Papers (Wikipedia here),
Beginning on October 27, 1787 the Federalist Papers were first published in the New York press under the signature of "Publius". These papers are generally considered to be one of the most important contributions to political thought made in America.
The papers were actually written by James Madison, Alexander Hamilton and John Jay, all under the single pseudonym Publius as noted above. They were never secret, and were published as they were written as part of the campaign to achieve ratification of the Constitution.
answered Dec 18 '18 at 5:28
Pieter GeerkensPieter Geerkens
39.5k6116189
39.5k6116189
1
I remember there were some meetings behind closed windows etc., pretty secretive. Maybe deliberations about the declaration of independence?
– user1050755
Dec 18 '18 at 5:46
2
@user1050755: Nope - worst kept secret in history: "In the campaign to revise Congressional instructions [to enable a declaration of independence], many Americans formally expressed their support for separation from Great Britain in what were effectively state and local declarations of independence. Historian Pauline Maier identifies more than ninety such declarations that were issued throughout the Thirteen Colonies from April to July 1776."
– Pieter Geerkens
Dec 18 '18 at 6:00
1
@user1050755 might be thinking of the constitution itself which seems to have been written in camera. (Revolutions podcast)
– Samuel Russell
Dec 18 '18 at 8:29
1
@SamuelRussell: Yep. I missed that possibility but T.E.D. picked it up.
– Pieter Geerkens
Dec 18 '18 at 8:51
The Federalist Papers were not recordings of deliberation. They were essentially pro-Constitution propaganda, and in most respects reflected the general arguments for a given provision, and did that very well, which is why they're a treasure of political thought.
– David Thornley
Dec 21 '18 at 18:45
add a comment |
1
I remember there were some meetings behind closed windows etc., pretty secretive. Maybe deliberations about the declaration of independence?
– user1050755
Dec 18 '18 at 5:46
2
@user1050755: Nope - worst kept secret in history: "In the campaign to revise Congressional instructions [to enable a declaration of independence], many Americans formally expressed their support for separation from Great Britain in what were effectively state and local declarations of independence. Historian Pauline Maier identifies more than ninety such declarations that were issued throughout the Thirteen Colonies from April to July 1776."
– Pieter Geerkens
Dec 18 '18 at 6:00
1
@user1050755 might be thinking of the constitution itself which seems to have been written in camera. (Revolutions podcast)
– Samuel Russell
Dec 18 '18 at 8:29
1
@SamuelRussell: Yep. I missed that possibility but T.E.D. picked it up.
– Pieter Geerkens
Dec 18 '18 at 8:51
The Federalist Papers were not recordings of deliberation. They were essentially pro-Constitution propaganda, and in most respects reflected the general arguments for a given provision, and did that very well, which is why they're a treasure of political thought.
– David Thornley
Dec 21 '18 at 18:45
1
1
I remember there were some meetings behind closed windows etc., pretty secretive. Maybe deliberations about the declaration of independence?
– user1050755
Dec 18 '18 at 5:46
I remember there were some meetings behind closed windows etc., pretty secretive. Maybe deliberations about the declaration of independence?
– user1050755
Dec 18 '18 at 5:46
2
2
@user1050755: Nope - worst kept secret in history: "In the campaign to revise Congressional instructions [to enable a declaration of independence], many Americans formally expressed their support for separation from Great Britain in what were effectively state and local declarations of independence. Historian Pauline Maier identifies more than ninety such declarations that were issued throughout the Thirteen Colonies from April to July 1776."
– Pieter Geerkens
Dec 18 '18 at 6:00
@user1050755: Nope - worst kept secret in history: "In the campaign to revise Congressional instructions [to enable a declaration of independence], many Americans formally expressed their support for separation from Great Britain in what were effectively state and local declarations of independence. Historian Pauline Maier identifies more than ninety such declarations that were issued throughout the Thirteen Colonies from April to July 1776."
– Pieter Geerkens
Dec 18 '18 at 6:00
1
1
@user1050755 might be thinking of the constitution itself which seems to have been written in camera. (Revolutions podcast)
– Samuel Russell
Dec 18 '18 at 8:29
@user1050755 might be thinking of the constitution itself which seems to have been written in camera. (Revolutions podcast)
– Samuel Russell
Dec 18 '18 at 8:29
1
1
@SamuelRussell: Yep. I missed that possibility but T.E.D. picked it up.
– Pieter Geerkens
Dec 18 '18 at 8:51
@SamuelRussell: Yep. I missed that possibility but T.E.D. picked it up.
– Pieter Geerkens
Dec 18 '18 at 8:51
The Federalist Papers were not recordings of deliberation. They were essentially pro-Constitution propaganda, and in most respects reflected the general arguments for a given provision, and did that very well, which is why they're a treasure of political thought.
– David Thornley
Dec 21 '18 at 18:45
The Federalist Papers were not recordings of deliberation. They were essentially pro-Constitution propaganda, and in most respects reflected the general arguments for a given provision, and did that very well, which is why they're a treasure of political thought.
– David Thornley
Dec 21 '18 at 18:45
add a comment |
Charles Thomson was the secretary of the Continental Congress from 1774 to 1789. In addition to keeping the official journals of the Congress, Thomson kept a number of private notes, which in later years he attempted to compile into a manuscript. This work, tentatively titled "Notes of the Intrigues and Severe Altercations or Quarrels in the Congress", reportedly reached over a thousand pages in length. Unfortunately for historians, Thomson eventually decided against publishing the manuscript, and instead destroyed it.
Nathaniel Philbrick wrote about Thomson and his manuscript in the preface to his book Valiant Ambition, which is how I learned about it.
New contributor
add a comment |
Charles Thomson was the secretary of the Continental Congress from 1774 to 1789. In addition to keeping the official journals of the Congress, Thomson kept a number of private notes, which in later years he attempted to compile into a manuscript. This work, tentatively titled "Notes of the Intrigues and Severe Altercations or Quarrels in the Congress", reportedly reached over a thousand pages in length. Unfortunately for historians, Thomson eventually decided against publishing the manuscript, and instead destroyed it.
Nathaniel Philbrick wrote about Thomson and his manuscript in the preface to his book Valiant Ambition, which is how I learned about it.
New contributor
add a comment |
Charles Thomson was the secretary of the Continental Congress from 1774 to 1789. In addition to keeping the official journals of the Congress, Thomson kept a number of private notes, which in later years he attempted to compile into a manuscript. This work, tentatively titled "Notes of the Intrigues and Severe Altercations or Quarrels in the Congress", reportedly reached over a thousand pages in length. Unfortunately for historians, Thomson eventually decided against publishing the manuscript, and instead destroyed it.
Nathaniel Philbrick wrote about Thomson and his manuscript in the preface to his book Valiant Ambition, which is how I learned about it.
New contributor
Charles Thomson was the secretary of the Continental Congress from 1774 to 1789. In addition to keeping the official journals of the Congress, Thomson kept a number of private notes, which in later years he attempted to compile into a manuscript. This work, tentatively titled "Notes of the Intrigues and Severe Altercations or Quarrels in the Congress", reportedly reached over a thousand pages in length. Unfortunately for historians, Thomson eventually decided against publishing the manuscript, and instead destroyed it.
Nathaniel Philbrick wrote about Thomson and his manuscript in the preface to his book Valiant Ambition, which is how I learned about it.
New contributor
New contributor
answered Jan 15 at 22:00
MJ713MJ713
1011
1011
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to History Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fhistory.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f50204%2fwas-there-a-secret-recording-of-the-american-founding-fathers-deliberations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
21
You remember? Goodness, you must be old.
– RedSonja
Dec 18 '18 at 11:36
2
I think it was Rittenhouse, from Timeless. When it comes to keeping minutes, who better than a clockmaker?
– Walter Mitty
Dec 18 '18 at 15:51
@WalterMitty - I'll second that.
– Don Branson
Dec 18 '18 at 23:37
I could tell you but I'd have to kill you as it's that secret.
– jwenting
2 days ago