Was there a “secret” recording of the American founding fathers' deliberations?












18















I remember that there was someone who wrote down the stuff the founding fathers talked about behind closed doors. Can't remember his name. Who was he again?










share|improve this question




















  • 21





    You remember? Goodness, you must be old.

    – RedSonja
    Dec 18 '18 at 11:36






  • 2





    I think it was Rittenhouse, from Timeless. When it comes to keeping minutes, who better than a clockmaker?

    – Walter Mitty
    Dec 18 '18 at 15:51











  • @WalterMitty - I'll second that.

    – Don Branson
    Dec 18 '18 at 23:37











  • I could tell you but I'd have to kill you as it's that secret.

    – jwenting
    2 days ago
















18















I remember that there was someone who wrote down the stuff the founding fathers talked about behind closed doors. Can't remember his name. Who was he again?










share|improve this question




















  • 21





    You remember? Goodness, you must be old.

    – RedSonja
    Dec 18 '18 at 11:36






  • 2





    I think it was Rittenhouse, from Timeless. When it comes to keeping minutes, who better than a clockmaker?

    – Walter Mitty
    Dec 18 '18 at 15:51











  • @WalterMitty - I'll second that.

    – Don Branson
    Dec 18 '18 at 23:37











  • I could tell you but I'd have to kill you as it's that secret.

    – jwenting
    2 days ago














18












18








18


6






I remember that there was someone who wrote down the stuff the founding fathers talked about behind closed doors. Can't remember his name. Who was he again?










share|improve this question
















I remember that there was someone who wrote down the stuff the founding fathers talked about behind closed doors. Can't remember his name. Who was he again?







united-states founding-fathers






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Dec 18 '18 at 10:17









Mark C. Wallace

23.4k972111




23.4k972111










asked Dec 18 '18 at 5:19









user1050755user1050755

19615




19615








  • 21





    You remember? Goodness, you must be old.

    – RedSonja
    Dec 18 '18 at 11:36






  • 2





    I think it was Rittenhouse, from Timeless. When it comes to keeping minutes, who better than a clockmaker?

    – Walter Mitty
    Dec 18 '18 at 15:51











  • @WalterMitty - I'll second that.

    – Don Branson
    Dec 18 '18 at 23:37











  • I could tell you but I'd have to kill you as it's that secret.

    – jwenting
    2 days ago














  • 21





    You remember? Goodness, you must be old.

    – RedSonja
    Dec 18 '18 at 11:36






  • 2





    I think it was Rittenhouse, from Timeless. When it comes to keeping minutes, who better than a clockmaker?

    – Walter Mitty
    Dec 18 '18 at 15:51











  • @WalterMitty - I'll second that.

    – Don Branson
    Dec 18 '18 at 23:37











  • I could tell you but I'd have to kill you as it's that secret.

    – jwenting
    2 days ago








21




21





You remember? Goodness, you must be old.

– RedSonja
Dec 18 '18 at 11:36





You remember? Goodness, you must be old.

– RedSonja
Dec 18 '18 at 11:36




2




2





I think it was Rittenhouse, from Timeless. When it comes to keeping minutes, who better than a clockmaker?

– Walter Mitty
Dec 18 '18 at 15:51





I think it was Rittenhouse, from Timeless. When it comes to keeping minutes, who better than a clockmaker?

– Walter Mitty
Dec 18 '18 at 15:51













@WalterMitty - I'll second that.

– Don Branson
Dec 18 '18 at 23:37





@WalterMitty - I'll second that.

– Don Branson
Dec 18 '18 at 23:37













I could tell you but I'd have to kill you as it's that secret.

– jwenting
2 days ago





I could tell you but I'd have to kill you as it's that secret.

– jwenting
2 days ago










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















27














Assuming you are talking about the Constitutional Convention...



It wasn't a "secret", but I suppose it is conveniently ignored by a lot of people that there were extensive records kept of the deliberations. They were delivered by the convention secretary to the convention "president" (George Washington, of course). Congress ordered them all printed in 1819.



Max Farrand in 1911 compiled them all and reprinted them together (in multiple volumes) as The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787.



I haven't read them myself directly, but they were from multiple sources, not just official proceedings notes. According to the link above, aside from the official notes the largest amount of material in there was written by James Madison. From the secondary sources I've read, it seems like rather a lot of the material in there was originally written by Alexander Hamilton as well.






share|improve this answer


























  • I think that's what I remembered. I first heard about it on Thom Hartmann's program over at youtube - he sometimes reads interesting history related stuff.

    – user1050755
    Dec 18 '18 at 7:07



















12














In 2011, the New York Historical Society acquired the Constitutional Convention notebooks of John Lansing, Jr., a New York delegate to the 1787 Philadelphia Convention. According to this announcement:




The delegates’ vow of secrecy, which banned the taking of notes for publication, limited the amount of material created documenting the Convention proceedings. Although notes by a number of other delegates, including James Madison, survive, Lansing’s are among the purest and most detailed, providing a unique and unedited first-hand account of the period of Lansing’s attendance at the Convention.




The society also holds the notes of Massachusetts delegate Rufus King, and has on deposit those of South Carolinian Pierce Butler.






share|improve this answer































    2














    You are likely thinking of The Federalist Papers (Wikipedia here),




    Beginning on October 27, 1787 the Federalist Papers were first published in the New York press under the signature of "Publius". These papers are generally considered to be one of the most important contributions to political thought made in America.




    The papers were actually written by James Madison, Alexander Hamilton and John Jay, all under the single pseudonym Publius as noted above. They were never secret, and were published as they were written as part of the campaign to achieve ratification of the Constitution.






    share|improve this answer



















    • 1





      I remember there were some meetings behind closed windows etc., pretty secretive. Maybe deliberations about the declaration of independence?

      – user1050755
      Dec 18 '18 at 5:46






    • 2





      @user1050755: Nope - worst kept secret in history: "In the campaign to revise Congressional instructions [to enable a declaration of independence], many Americans formally expressed their support for separation from Great Britain in what were effectively state and local declarations of independence. Historian Pauline Maier identifies more than ninety such declarations that were issued throughout the Thirteen Colonies from April to July 1776."

      – Pieter Geerkens
      Dec 18 '18 at 6:00








    • 1





      @user1050755 might be thinking of the constitution itself which seems to have been written in camera. (Revolutions podcast)

      – Samuel Russell
      Dec 18 '18 at 8:29






    • 1





      @SamuelRussell: Yep. I missed that possibility but T.E.D. picked it up.

      – Pieter Geerkens
      Dec 18 '18 at 8:51











    • The Federalist Papers were not recordings of deliberation. They were essentially pro-Constitution propaganda, and in most respects reflected the general arguments for a given provision, and did that very well, which is why they're a treasure of political thought.

      – David Thornley
      Dec 21 '18 at 18:45



















    0














    Charles Thomson was the secretary of the Continental Congress from 1774 to 1789. In addition to keeping the official journals of the Congress, Thomson kept a number of private notes, which in later years he attempted to compile into a manuscript. This work, tentatively titled "Notes of the Intrigues and Severe Altercations or Quarrels in the Congress", reportedly reached over a thousand pages in length. Unfortunately for historians, Thomson eventually decided against publishing the manuscript, and instead destroyed it.



    Nathaniel Philbrick wrote about Thomson and his manuscript in the preface to his book Valiant Ambition, which is how I learned about it.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    MJ713 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.




















      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "324"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fhistory.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f50204%2fwas-there-a-secret-recording-of-the-american-founding-fathers-deliberations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes








      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      27














      Assuming you are talking about the Constitutional Convention...



      It wasn't a "secret", but I suppose it is conveniently ignored by a lot of people that there were extensive records kept of the deliberations. They were delivered by the convention secretary to the convention "president" (George Washington, of course). Congress ordered them all printed in 1819.



      Max Farrand in 1911 compiled them all and reprinted them together (in multiple volumes) as The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787.



      I haven't read them myself directly, but they were from multiple sources, not just official proceedings notes. According to the link above, aside from the official notes the largest amount of material in there was written by James Madison. From the secondary sources I've read, it seems like rather a lot of the material in there was originally written by Alexander Hamilton as well.






      share|improve this answer


























      • I think that's what I remembered. I first heard about it on Thom Hartmann's program over at youtube - he sometimes reads interesting history related stuff.

        – user1050755
        Dec 18 '18 at 7:07
















      27














      Assuming you are talking about the Constitutional Convention...



      It wasn't a "secret", but I suppose it is conveniently ignored by a lot of people that there were extensive records kept of the deliberations. They were delivered by the convention secretary to the convention "president" (George Washington, of course). Congress ordered them all printed in 1819.



      Max Farrand in 1911 compiled them all and reprinted them together (in multiple volumes) as The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787.



      I haven't read them myself directly, but they were from multiple sources, not just official proceedings notes. According to the link above, aside from the official notes the largest amount of material in there was written by James Madison. From the secondary sources I've read, it seems like rather a lot of the material in there was originally written by Alexander Hamilton as well.






      share|improve this answer


























      • I think that's what I remembered. I first heard about it on Thom Hartmann's program over at youtube - he sometimes reads interesting history related stuff.

        – user1050755
        Dec 18 '18 at 7:07














      27












      27








      27







      Assuming you are talking about the Constitutional Convention...



      It wasn't a "secret", but I suppose it is conveniently ignored by a lot of people that there were extensive records kept of the deliberations. They were delivered by the convention secretary to the convention "president" (George Washington, of course). Congress ordered them all printed in 1819.



      Max Farrand in 1911 compiled them all and reprinted them together (in multiple volumes) as The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787.



      I haven't read them myself directly, but they were from multiple sources, not just official proceedings notes. According to the link above, aside from the official notes the largest amount of material in there was written by James Madison. From the secondary sources I've read, it seems like rather a lot of the material in there was originally written by Alexander Hamilton as well.






      share|improve this answer















      Assuming you are talking about the Constitutional Convention...



      It wasn't a "secret", but I suppose it is conveniently ignored by a lot of people that there were extensive records kept of the deliberations. They were delivered by the convention secretary to the convention "president" (George Washington, of course). Congress ordered them all printed in 1819.



      Max Farrand in 1911 compiled them all and reprinted them together (in multiple volumes) as The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787.



      I haven't read them myself directly, but they were from multiple sources, not just official proceedings notes. According to the link above, aside from the official notes the largest amount of material in there was written by James Madison. From the secondary sources I've read, it seems like rather a lot of the material in there was originally written by Alexander Hamilton as well.







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited Dec 18 '18 at 6:33

























      answered Dec 18 '18 at 6:30









      T.E.D.T.E.D.

      74.3k10163302




      74.3k10163302













      • I think that's what I remembered. I first heard about it on Thom Hartmann's program over at youtube - he sometimes reads interesting history related stuff.

        – user1050755
        Dec 18 '18 at 7:07



















      • I think that's what I remembered. I first heard about it on Thom Hartmann's program over at youtube - he sometimes reads interesting history related stuff.

        – user1050755
        Dec 18 '18 at 7:07

















      I think that's what I remembered. I first heard about it on Thom Hartmann's program over at youtube - he sometimes reads interesting history related stuff.

      – user1050755
      Dec 18 '18 at 7:07





      I think that's what I remembered. I first heard about it on Thom Hartmann's program over at youtube - he sometimes reads interesting history related stuff.

      – user1050755
      Dec 18 '18 at 7:07











      12














      In 2011, the New York Historical Society acquired the Constitutional Convention notebooks of John Lansing, Jr., a New York delegate to the 1787 Philadelphia Convention. According to this announcement:




      The delegates’ vow of secrecy, which banned the taking of notes for publication, limited the amount of material created documenting the Convention proceedings. Although notes by a number of other delegates, including James Madison, survive, Lansing’s are among the purest and most detailed, providing a unique and unedited first-hand account of the period of Lansing’s attendance at the Convention.




      The society also holds the notes of Massachusetts delegate Rufus King, and has on deposit those of South Carolinian Pierce Butler.






      share|improve this answer




























        12














        In 2011, the New York Historical Society acquired the Constitutional Convention notebooks of John Lansing, Jr., a New York delegate to the 1787 Philadelphia Convention. According to this announcement:




        The delegates’ vow of secrecy, which banned the taking of notes for publication, limited the amount of material created documenting the Convention proceedings. Although notes by a number of other delegates, including James Madison, survive, Lansing’s are among the purest and most detailed, providing a unique and unedited first-hand account of the period of Lansing’s attendance at the Convention.




        The society also holds the notes of Massachusetts delegate Rufus King, and has on deposit those of South Carolinian Pierce Butler.






        share|improve this answer


























          12












          12








          12







          In 2011, the New York Historical Society acquired the Constitutional Convention notebooks of John Lansing, Jr., a New York delegate to the 1787 Philadelphia Convention. According to this announcement:




          The delegates’ vow of secrecy, which banned the taking of notes for publication, limited the amount of material created documenting the Convention proceedings. Although notes by a number of other delegates, including James Madison, survive, Lansing’s are among the purest and most detailed, providing a unique and unedited first-hand account of the period of Lansing’s attendance at the Convention.




          The society also holds the notes of Massachusetts delegate Rufus King, and has on deposit those of South Carolinian Pierce Butler.






          share|improve this answer













          In 2011, the New York Historical Society acquired the Constitutional Convention notebooks of John Lansing, Jr., a New York delegate to the 1787 Philadelphia Convention. According to this announcement:




          The delegates’ vow of secrecy, which banned the taking of notes for publication, limited the amount of material created documenting the Convention proceedings. Although notes by a number of other delegates, including James Madison, survive, Lansing’s are among the purest and most detailed, providing a unique and unedited first-hand account of the period of Lansing’s attendance at the Convention.




          The society also holds the notes of Massachusetts delegate Rufus King, and has on deposit those of South Carolinian Pierce Butler.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Dec 18 '18 at 15:09









          sdenhamsdenham

          25316




          25316























              2














              You are likely thinking of The Federalist Papers (Wikipedia here),




              Beginning on October 27, 1787 the Federalist Papers were first published in the New York press under the signature of "Publius". These papers are generally considered to be one of the most important contributions to political thought made in America.




              The papers were actually written by James Madison, Alexander Hamilton and John Jay, all under the single pseudonym Publius as noted above. They were never secret, and were published as they were written as part of the campaign to achieve ratification of the Constitution.






              share|improve this answer



















              • 1





                I remember there were some meetings behind closed windows etc., pretty secretive. Maybe deliberations about the declaration of independence?

                – user1050755
                Dec 18 '18 at 5:46






              • 2





                @user1050755: Nope - worst kept secret in history: "In the campaign to revise Congressional instructions [to enable a declaration of independence], many Americans formally expressed their support for separation from Great Britain in what were effectively state and local declarations of independence. Historian Pauline Maier identifies more than ninety such declarations that were issued throughout the Thirteen Colonies from April to July 1776."

                – Pieter Geerkens
                Dec 18 '18 at 6:00








              • 1





                @user1050755 might be thinking of the constitution itself which seems to have been written in camera. (Revolutions podcast)

                – Samuel Russell
                Dec 18 '18 at 8:29






              • 1





                @SamuelRussell: Yep. I missed that possibility but T.E.D. picked it up.

                – Pieter Geerkens
                Dec 18 '18 at 8:51











              • The Federalist Papers were not recordings of deliberation. They were essentially pro-Constitution propaganda, and in most respects reflected the general arguments for a given provision, and did that very well, which is why they're a treasure of political thought.

                – David Thornley
                Dec 21 '18 at 18:45
















              2














              You are likely thinking of The Federalist Papers (Wikipedia here),




              Beginning on October 27, 1787 the Federalist Papers were first published in the New York press under the signature of "Publius". These papers are generally considered to be one of the most important contributions to political thought made in America.




              The papers were actually written by James Madison, Alexander Hamilton and John Jay, all under the single pseudonym Publius as noted above. They were never secret, and were published as they were written as part of the campaign to achieve ratification of the Constitution.






              share|improve this answer



















              • 1





                I remember there were some meetings behind closed windows etc., pretty secretive. Maybe deliberations about the declaration of independence?

                – user1050755
                Dec 18 '18 at 5:46






              • 2





                @user1050755: Nope - worst kept secret in history: "In the campaign to revise Congressional instructions [to enable a declaration of independence], many Americans formally expressed their support for separation from Great Britain in what were effectively state and local declarations of independence. Historian Pauline Maier identifies more than ninety such declarations that were issued throughout the Thirteen Colonies from April to July 1776."

                – Pieter Geerkens
                Dec 18 '18 at 6:00








              • 1





                @user1050755 might be thinking of the constitution itself which seems to have been written in camera. (Revolutions podcast)

                – Samuel Russell
                Dec 18 '18 at 8:29






              • 1





                @SamuelRussell: Yep. I missed that possibility but T.E.D. picked it up.

                – Pieter Geerkens
                Dec 18 '18 at 8:51











              • The Federalist Papers were not recordings of deliberation. They were essentially pro-Constitution propaganda, and in most respects reflected the general arguments for a given provision, and did that very well, which is why they're a treasure of political thought.

                – David Thornley
                Dec 21 '18 at 18:45














              2












              2








              2







              You are likely thinking of The Federalist Papers (Wikipedia here),




              Beginning on October 27, 1787 the Federalist Papers were first published in the New York press under the signature of "Publius". These papers are generally considered to be one of the most important contributions to political thought made in America.




              The papers were actually written by James Madison, Alexander Hamilton and John Jay, all under the single pseudonym Publius as noted above. They were never secret, and were published as they were written as part of the campaign to achieve ratification of the Constitution.






              share|improve this answer













              You are likely thinking of The Federalist Papers (Wikipedia here),




              Beginning on October 27, 1787 the Federalist Papers were first published in the New York press under the signature of "Publius". These papers are generally considered to be one of the most important contributions to political thought made in America.




              The papers were actually written by James Madison, Alexander Hamilton and John Jay, all under the single pseudonym Publius as noted above. They were never secret, and were published as they were written as part of the campaign to achieve ratification of the Constitution.







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered Dec 18 '18 at 5:28









              Pieter GeerkensPieter Geerkens

              39.5k6116189




              39.5k6116189








              • 1





                I remember there were some meetings behind closed windows etc., pretty secretive. Maybe deliberations about the declaration of independence?

                – user1050755
                Dec 18 '18 at 5:46






              • 2





                @user1050755: Nope - worst kept secret in history: "In the campaign to revise Congressional instructions [to enable a declaration of independence], many Americans formally expressed their support for separation from Great Britain in what were effectively state and local declarations of independence. Historian Pauline Maier identifies more than ninety such declarations that were issued throughout the Thirteen Colonies from April to July 1776."

                – Pieter Geerkens
                Dec 18 '18 at 6:00








              • 1





                @user1050755 might be thinking of the constitution itself which seems to have been written in camera. (Revolutions podcast)

                – Samuel Russell
                Dec 18 '18 at 8:29






              • 1





                @SamuelRussell: Yep. I missed that possibility but T.E.D. picked it up.

                – Pieter Geerkens
                Dec 18 '18 at 8:51











              • The Federalist Papers were not recordings of deliberation. They were essentially pro-Constitution propaganda, and in most respects reflected the general arguments for a given provision, and did that very well, which is why they're a treasure of political thought.

                – David Thornley
                Dec 21 '18 at 18:45














              • 1





                I remember there were some meetings behind closed windows etc., pretty secretive. Maybe deliberations about the declaration of independence?

                – user1050755
                Dec 18 '18 at 5:46






              • 2





                @user1050755: Nope - worst kept secret in history: "In the campaign to revise Congressional instructions [to enable a declaration of independence], many Americans formally expressed their support for separation from Great Britain in what were effectively state and local declarations of independence. Historian Pauline Maier identifies more than ninety such declarations that were issued throughout the Thirteen Colonies from April to July 1776."

                – Pieter Geerkens
                Dec 18 '18 at 6:00








              • 1





                @user1050755 might be thinking of the constitution itself which seems to have been written in camera. (Revolutions podcast)

                – Samuel Russell
                Dec 18 '18 at 8:29






              • 1





                @SamuelRussell: Yep. I missed that possibility but T.E.D. picked it up.

                – Pieter Geerkens
                Dec 18 '18 at 8:51











              • The Federalist Papers were not recordings of deliberation. They were essentially pro-Constitution propaganda, and in most respects reflected the general arguments for a given provision, and did that very well, which is why they're a treasure of political thought.

                – David Thornley
                Dec 21 '18 at 18:45








              1




              1





              I remember there were some meetings behind closed windows etc., pretty secretive. Maybe deliberations about the declaration of independence?

              – user1050755
              Dec 18 '18 at 5:46





              I remember there were some meetings behind closed windows etc., pretty secretive. Maybe deliberations about the declaration of independence?

              – user1050755
              Dec 18 '18 at 5:46




              2




              2





              @user1050755: Nope - worst kept secret in history: "In the campaign to revise Congressional instructions [to enable a declaration of independence], many Americans formally expressed their support for separation from Great Britain in what were effectively state and local declarations of independence. Historian Pauline Maier identifies more than ninety such declarations that were issued throughout the Thirteen Colonies from April to July 1776."

              – Pieter Geerkens
              Dec 18 '18 at 6:00







              @user1050755: Nope - worst kept secret in history: "In the campaign to revise Congressional instructions [to enable a declaration of independence], many Americans formally expressed their support for separation from Great Britain in what were effectively state and local declarations of independence. Historian Pauline Maier identifies more than ninety such declarations that were issued throughout the Thirteen Colonies from April to July 1776."

              – Pieter Geerkens
              Dec 18 '18 at 6:00






              1




              1





              @user1050755 might be thinking of the constitution itself which seems to have been written in camera. (Revolutions podcast)

              – Samuel Russell
              Dec 18 '18 at 8:29





              @user1050755 might be thinking of the constitution itself which seems to have been written in camera. (Revolutions podcast)

              – Samuel Russell
              Dec 18 '18 at 8:29




              1




              1





              @SamuelRussell: Yep. I missed that possibility but T.E.D. picked it up.

              – Pieter Geerkens
              Dec 18 '18 at 8:51





              @SamuelRussell: Yep. I missed that possibility but T.E.D. picked it up.

              – Pieter Geerkens
              Dec 18 '18 at 8:51













              The Federalist Papers were not recordings of deliberation. They were essentially pro-Constitution propaganda, and in most respects reflected the general arguments for a given provision, and did that very well, which is why they're a treasure of political thought.

              – David Thornley
              Dec 21 '18 at 18:45





              The Federalist Papers were not recordings of deliberation. They were essentially pro-Constitution propaganda, and in most respects reflected the general arguments for a given provision, and did that very well, which is why they're a treasure of political thought.

              – David Thornley
              Dec 21 '18 at 18:45











              0














              Charles Thomson was the secretary of the Continental Congress from 1774 to 1789. In addition to keeping the official journals of the Congress, Thomson kept a number of private notes, which in later years he attempted to compile into a manuscript. This work, tentatively titled "Notes of the Intrigues and Severe Altercations or Quarrels in the Congress", reportedly reached over a thousand pages in length. Unfortunately for historians, Thomson eventually decided against publishing the manuscript, and instead destroyed it.



              Nathaniel Philbrick wrote about Thomson and his manuscript in the preface to his book Valiant Ambition, which is how I learned about it.






              share|improve this answer








              New contributor




              MJ713 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.

























                0














                Charles Thomson was the secretary of the Continental Congress from 1774 to 1789. In addition to keeping the official journals of the Congress, Thomson kept a number of private notes, which in later years he attempted to compile into a manuscript. This work, tentatively titled "Notes of the Intrigues and Severe Altercations or Quarrels in the Congress", reportedly reached over a thousand pages in length. Unfortunately for historians, Thomson eventually decided against publishing the manuscript, and instead destroyed it.



                Nathaniel Philbrick wrote about Thomson and his manuscript in the preface to his book Valiant Ambition, which is how I learned about it.






                share|improve this answer








                New contributor




                MJ713 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.























                  0












                  0








                  0







                  Charles Thomson was the secretary of the Continental Congress from 1774 to 1789. In addition to keeping the official journals of the Congress, Thomson kept a number of private notes, which in later years he attempted to compile into a manuscript. This work, tentatively titled "Notes of the Intrigues and Severe Altercations or Quarrels in the Congress", reportedly reached over a thousand pages in length. Unfortunately for historians, Thomson eventually decided against publishing the manuscript, and instead destroyed it.



                  Nathaniel Philbrick wrote about Thomson and his manuscript in the preface to his book Valiant Ambition, which is how I learned about it.






                  share|improve this answer








                  New contributor




                  MJ713 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.










                  Charles Thomson was the secretary of the Continental Congress from 1774 to 1789. In addition to keeping the official journals of the Congress, Thomson kept a number of private notes, which in later years he attempted to compile into a manuscript. This work, tentatively titled "Notes of the Intrigues and Severe Altercations or Quarrels in the Congress", reportedly reached over a thousand pages in length. Unfortunately for historians, Thomson eventually decided against publishing the manuscript, and instead destroyed it.



                  Nathaniel Philbrick wrote about Thomson and his manuscript in the preface to his book Valiant Ambition, which is how I learned about it.







                  share|improve this answer








                  New contributor




                  MJ713 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer






                  New contributor




                  MJ713 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  answered Jan 15 at 22:00









                  MJ713MJ713

                  1011




                  1011




                  New contributor




                  MJ713 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.





                  New contributor





                  MJ713 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






                  MJ713 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to History Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fhistory.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f50204%2fwas-there-a-secret-recording-of-the-american-founding-fathers-deliberations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Сан-Квентин

                      Алькесар

                      Josef Freinademetz