How much faster is Dual Channel than Intel's Flex Memory Mode?












1














How much faster is a RAM configuration of sticks 8+8+4+4 than one of 8+8+8? I'm interested in delay and speed in MB/s.










share|improve this question





























    1














    How much faster is a RAM configuration of sticks 8+8+4+4 than one of 8+8+8? I'm interested in delay and speed in MB/s.










    share|improve this question



























      1












      1








      1







      How much faster is a RAM configuration of sticks 8+8+4+4 than one of 8+8+8? I'm interested in delay and speed in MB/s.










      share|improve this question















      How much faster is a RAM configuration of sticks 8+8+4+4 than one of 8+8+8? I'm interested in delay and speed in MB/s.







      ddr dual-channel






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Dec 7 '18 at 23:51









      K7AAY

      3,62321438




      3,62321438










      asked Dec 7 '18 at 23:18









      Alex78191

      1187




      1187






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0














          Assuming a processor that supports Triple-Channel, the second version (8+8+8) would be faster.



          The first version (8+8+4+4) would only support Dual-Channel.



          About the Triple-Channel memory architecture:




          The architecture can only be used when all three, or a multiple of three, memory modules are identical in capacity and speed, and are placed in three-channel slots. When two memory modules are installed, the architecture will operate in dual-channel architecture mode.




          The delay and the speed of this difference are hard to tell.

          I do not know of any measuring in this regard.

          He who has any reliable information in this regard should stand up and tell.






          share|improve this answer





















          • What about sual-channel processors?
            – Alex78191
            Dec 7 '18 at 23:52










          • Your processor/mainboard combo has to support Triple-Channel, of course. If this combo only supports Dual-Channel, you are limited to this. You can check if your processor supports Triple-Channel by visiting the link I provided.
            – zx485
            Dec 7 '18 at 23:55












          • I'd expect software that is "hardware agnostic" (in the relevant sense) to show any differences in speed, if there is any detectable difference - e.g. google "memtest86"
            – Hannu
            Dec 8 '18 at 16:14











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "3"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1381787%2fhow-much-faster-is-dual-channel-than-intels-flex-memory-mode%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0














          Assuming a processor that supports Triple-Channel, the second version (8+8+8) would be faster.



          The first version (8+8+4+4) would only support Dual-Channel.



          About the Triple-Channel memory architecture:




          The architecture can only be used when all three, or a multiple of three, memory modules are identical in capacity and speed, and are placed in three-channel slots. When two memory modules are installed, the architecture will operate in dual-channel architecture mode.




          The delay and the speed of this difference are hard to tell.

          I do not know of any measuring in this regard.

          He who has any reliable information in this regard should stand up and tell.






          share|improve this answer





















          • What about sual-channel processors?
            – Alex78191
            Dec 7 '18 at 23:52










          • Your processor/mainboard combo has to support Triple-Channel, of course. If this combo only supports Dual-Channel, you are limited to this. You can check if your processor supports Triple-Channel by visiting the link I provided.
            – zx485
            Dec 7 '18 at 23:55












          • I'd expect software that is "hardware agnostic" (in the relevant sense) to show any differences in speed, if there is any detectable difference - e.g. google "memtest86"
            – Hannu
            Dec 8 '18 at 16:14
















          0














          Assuming a processor that supports Triple-Channel, the second version (8+8+8) would be faster.



          The first version (8+8+4+4) would only support Dual-Channel.



          About the Triple-Channel memory architecture:




          The architecture can only be used when all three, or a multiple of three, memory modules are identical in capacity and speed, and are placed in three-channel slots. When two memory modules are installed, the architecture will operate in dual-channel architecture mode.




          The delay and the speed of this difference are hard to tell.

          I do not know of any measuring in this regard.

          He who has any reliable information in this regard should stand up and tell.






          share|improve this answer





















          • What about sual-channel processors?
            – Alex78191
            Dec 7 '18 at 23:52










          • Your processor/mainboard combo has to support Triple-Channel, of course. If this combo only supports Dual-Channel, you are limited to this. You can check if your processor supports Triple-Channel by visiting the link I provided.
            – zx485
            Dec 7 '18 at 23:55












          • I'd expect software that is "hardware agnostic" (in the relevant sense) to show any differences in speed, if there is any detectable difference - e.g. google "memtest86"
            – Hannu
            Dec 8 '18 at 16:14














          0












          0








          0






          Assuming a processor that supports Triple-Channel, the second version (8+8+8) would be faster.



          The first version (8+8+4+4) would only support Dual-Channel.



          About the Triple-Channel memory architecture:




          The architecture can only be used when all three, or a multiple of three, memory modules are identical in capacity and speed, and are placed in three-channel slots. When two memory modules are installed, the architecture will operate in dual-channel architecture mode.




          The delay and the speed of this difference are hard to tell.

          I do not know of any measuring in this regard.

          He who has any reliable information in this regard should stand up and tell.






          share|improve this answer












          Assuming a processor that supports Triple-Channel, the second version (8+8+8) would be faster.



          The first version (8+8+4+4) would only support Dual-Channel.



          About the Triple-Channel memory architecture:




          The architecture can only be used when all three, or a multiple of three, memory modules are identical in capacity and speed, and are placed in three-channel slots. When two memory modules are installed, the architecture will operate in dual-channel architecture mode.




          The delay and the speed of this difference are hard to tell.

          I do not know of any measuring in this regard.

          He who has any reliable information in this regard should stand up and tell.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Dec 7 '18 at 23:42









          zx485

          759613




          759613












          • What about sual-channel processors?
            – Alex78191
            Dec 7 '18 at 23:52










          • Your processor/mainboard combo has to support Triple-Channel, of course. If this combo only supports Dual-Channel, you are limited to this. You can check if your processor supports Triple-Channel by visiting the link I provided.
            – zx485
            Dec 7 '18 at 23:55












          • I'd expect software that is "hardware agnostic" (in the relevant sense) to show any differences in speed, if there is any detectable difference - e.g. google "memtest86"
            – Hannu
            Dec 8 '18 at 16:14


















          • What about sual-channel processors?
            – Alex78191
            Dec 7 '18 at 23:52










          • Your processor/mainboard combo has to support Triple-Channel, of course. If this combo only supports Dual-Channel, you are limited to this. You can check if your processor supports Triple-Channel by visiting the link I provided.
            – zx485
            Dec 7 '18 at 23:55












          • I'd expect software that is "hardware agnostic" (in the relevant sense) to show any differences in speed, if there is any detectable difference - e.g. google "memtest86"
            – Hannu
            Dec 8 '18 at 16:14
















          What about sual-channel processors?
          – Alex78191
          Dec 7 '18 at 23:52




          What about sual-channel processors?
          – Alex78191
          Dec 7 '18 at 23:52












          Your processor/mainboard combo has to support Triple-Channel, of course. If this combo only supports Dual-Channel, you are limited to this. You can check if your processor supports Triple-Channel by visiting the link I provided.
          – zx485
          Dec 7 '18 at 23:55






          Your processor/mainboard combo has to support Triple-Channel, of course. If this combo only supports Dual-Channel, you are limited to this. You can check if your processor supports Triple-Channel by visiting the link I provided.
          – zx485
          Dec 7 '18 at 23:55














          I'd expect software that is "hardware agnostic" (in the relevant sense) to show any differences in speed, if there is any detectable difference - e.g. google "memtest86"
          – Hannu
          Dec 8 '18 at 16:14




          I'd expect software that is "hardware agnostic" (in the relevant sense) to show any differences in speed, if there is any detectable difference - e.g. google "memtest86"
          – Hannu
          Dec 8 '18 at 16:14


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1381787%2fhow-much-faster-is-dual-channel-than-intels-flex-memory-mode%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Сан-Квентин

          Алькесар

          Josef Freinademetz