How do I get a tilted equal sign for an equation?











up vote
7
down vote

favorite












For example, this is what I am looking for:



enter image description here



Usually for limits where the value is 0 or 1 of a particular expression (e^x) in this case, you might see something like a tilted 45 degrees equal sign, and the value of that expression.



Not sure how to do it here.



Maybe something like a overbrace without the actual overbrace visible?










share|improve this question


















  • 1




    Why not this?
    – Werner
    Nov 23 at 22:24






  • 5




    e^x is not equal to 1.
    – egreg
    Nov 23 at 22:32






  • 1




    @marmot I find it wrong: it is not an equality and will confuse the students, rather than help them.
    – egreg
    Nov 23 at 22:35










  • @marmot: Sure, there are conditions imposed on A and B - they both need to have their own respective limits, but that is besides the point here. Do you find the product of the limits is the limit of the products confusing? I find the =1 coloured, slanted superscript confusing.
    – Werner
    Nov 23 at 22:36






  • 2




    Please ignore whether the math is correct or not correct. This is simply what I have seen around in class, where if we are evaluating the limit at x=0, then clearly e^0 = 1, this is why I have the = 1
    – K Split X
    Nov 24 at 1:09















up vote
7
down vote

favorite












For example, this is what I am looking for:



enter image description here



Usually for limits where the value is 0 or 1 of a particular expression (e^x) in this case, you might see something like a tilted 45 degrees equal sign, and the value of that expression.



Not sure how to do it here.



Maybe something like a overbrace without the actual overbrace visible?










share|improve this question


















  • 1




    Why not this?
    – Werner
    Nov 23 at 22:24






  • 5




    e^x is not equal to 1.
    – egreg
    Nov 23 at 22:32






  • 1




    @marmot I find it wrong: it is not an equality and will confuse the students, rather than help them.
    – egreg
    Nov 23 at 22:35










  • @marmot: Sure, there are conditions imposed on A and B - they both need to have their own respective limits, but that is besides the point here. Do you find the product of the limits is the limit of the products confusing? I find the =1 coloured, slanted superscript confusing.
    – Werner
    Nov 23 at 22:36






  • 2




    Please ignore whether the math is correct or not correct. This is simply what I have seen around in class, where if we are evaluating the limit at x=0, then clearly e^0 = 1, this is why I have the = 1
    – K Split X
    Nov 24 at 1:09













up vote
7
down vote

favorite









up vote
7
down vote

favorite











For example, this is what I am looking for:



enter image description here



Usually for limits where the value is 0 or 1 of a particular expression (e^x) in this case, you might see something like a tilted 45 degrees equal sign, and the value of that expression.



Not sure how to do it here.



Maybe something like a overbrace without the actual overbrace visible?










share|improve this question













For example, this is what I am looking for:



enter image description here



Usually for limits where the value is 0 or 1 of a particular expression (e^x) in this case, you might see something like a tilted 45 degrees equal sign, and the value of that expression.



Not sure how to do it here.



Maybe something like a overbrace without the actual overbrace visible?







math-mode stacking-symbols






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 23 at 21:59









K Split X

17724




17724








  • 1




    Why not this?
    – Werner
    Nov 23 at 22:24






  • 5




    e^x is not equal to 1.
    – egreg
    Nov 23 at 22:32






  • 1




    @marmot I find it wrong: it is not an equality and will confuse the students, rather than help them.
    – egreg
    Nov 23 at 22:35










  • @marmot: Sure, there are conditions imposed on A and B - they both need to have their own respective limits, but that is besides the point here. Do you find the product of the limits is the limit of the products confusing? I find the =1 coloured, slanted superscript confusing.
    – Werner
    Nov 23 at 22:36






  • 2




    Please ignore whether the math is correct or not correct. This is simply what I have seen around in class, where if we are evaluating the limit at x=0, then clearly e^0 = 1, this is why I have the = 1
    – K Split X
    Nov 24 at 1:09














  • 1




    Why not this?
    – Werner
    Nov 23 at 22:24






  • 5




    e^x is not equal to 1.
    – egreg
    Nov 23 at 22:32






  • 1




    @marmot I find it wrong: it is not an equality and will confuse the students, rather than help them.
    – egreg
    Nov 23 at 22:35










  • @marmot: Sure, there are conditions imposed on A and B - they both need to have their own respective limits, but that is besides the point here. Do you find the product of the limits is the limit of the products confusing? I find the =1 coloured, slanted superscript confusing.
    – Werner
    Nov 23 at 22:36






  • 2




    Please ignore whether the math is correct or not correct. This is simply what I have seen around in class, where if we are evaluating the limit at x=0, then clearly e^0 = 1, this is why I have the = 1
    – K Split X
    Nov 24 at 1:09








1




1




Why not this?
– Werner
Nov 23 at 22:24




Why not this?
– Werner
Nov 23 at 22:24




5




5




e^x is not equal to 1.
– egreg
Nov 23 at 22:32




e^x is not equal to 1.
– egreg
Nov 23 at 22:32




1




1




@marmot I find it wrong: it is not an equality and will confuse the students, rather than help them.
– egreg
Nov 23 at 22:35




@marmot I find it wrong: it is not an equality and will confuse the students, rather than help them.
– egreg
Nov 23 at 22:35












@marmot: Sure, there are conditions imposed on A and B - they both need to have their own respective limits, but that is besides the point here. Do you find the product of the limits is the limit of the products confusing? I find the =1 coloured, slanted superscript confusing.
– Werner
Nov 23 at 22:36




@marmot: Sure, there are conditions imposed on A and B - they both need to have their own respective limits, but that is besides the point here. Do you find the product of the limits is the limit of the products confusing? I find the =1 coloured, slanted superscript confusing.
– Werner
Nov 23 at 22:36




2




2




Please ignore whether the math is correct or not correct. This is simply what I have seen around in class, where if we are evaluating the limit at x=0, then clearly e^0 = 1, this is why I have the = 1
– K Split X
Nov 24 at 1:09




Please ignore whether the math is correct or not correct. This is simply what I have seen around in class, where if we are evaluating the limit at x=0, then clearly e^0 = 1, this is why I have the = 1
– K Split X
Nov 24 at 1:09










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
12
down vote



accepted










If you only want to draw one of those, this might be a bit of an overkill, but if you plan to do several annotations of that kind and wish to have access to more fancy features, this might be a reasonable way to go.



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{tikzmark}
begin{document}
[lim_{xto0}tikzmarknode{ex}{mathrm{e}^x}left(2+4xright)~=~2]
begin{tikzpicture}[overlay,remember picture]
path[red] ([xshift=1pt,yshift=1pt]ex.north east) -- ++(45:{width("=")*1pt-1pt})
node[midway,sloped]{$=$} node[above right=-2pt]{$1$};
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}


enter image description here



Arguably somewhat clearer alternatives include



documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{tikzmark}
begin{document}
[lim_{xto0}tikzmarknode{ex}{mathrm{e}^x}left(2+4xright)~=~2]
begin{tikzpicture}[overlay,remember picture]
draw[red,->] ([xshift=1pt,yshift=1pt]ex.north east) --
++(45:{width("$scriptstyle xto0$")*1pt})
node[midway,sloped,above]{$scriptstyle xto0$} node[above right=-1pt]{$1$};
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}


enter image description here



which illustrates what I mean by "more fancy options".






share|improve this answer























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "85"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f461487%2fhow-do-i-get-a-tilted-equal-sign-for-an-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    12
    down vote



    accepted










    If you only want to draw one of those, this might be a bit of an overkill, but if you plan to do several annotations of that kind and wish to have access to more fancy features, this might be a reasonable way to go.



    documentclass{article}
    usepackage{amsmath}
    usepackage{tikz}
    usetikzlibrary{tikzmark}
    begin{document}
    [lim_{xto0}tikzmarknode{ex}{mathrm{e}^x}left(2+4xright)~=~2]
    begin{tikzpicture}[overlay,remember picture]
    path[red] ([xshift=1pt,yshift=1pt]ex.north east) -- ++(45:{width("=")*1pt-1pt})
    node[midway,sloped]{$=$} node[above right=-2pt]{$1$};
    end{tikzpicture}
    end{document}


    enter image description here



    Arguably somewhat clearer alternatives include



    documentclass{article}
    usepackage{mathtools}
    usepackage{tikz}
    usetikzlibrary{tikzmark}
    begin{document}
    [lim_{xto0}tikzmarknode{ex}{mathrm{e}^x}left(2+4xright)~=~2]
    begin{tikzpicture}[overlay,remember picture]
    draw[red,->] ([xshift=1pt,yshift=1pt]ex.north east) --
    ++(45:{width("$scriptstyle xto0$")*1pt})
    node[midway,sloped,above]{$scriptstyle xto0$} node[above right=-1pt]{$1$};
    end{tikzpicture}
    end{document}


    enter image description here



    which illustrates what I mean by "more fancy options".






    share|improve this answer



























      up vote
      12
      down vote



      accepted










      If you only want to draw one of those, this might be a bit of an overkill, but if you plan to do several annotations of that kind and wish to have access to more fancy features, this might be a reasonable way to go.



      documentclass{article}
      usepackage{amsmath}
      usepackage{tikz}
      usetikzlibrary{tikzmark}
      begin{document}
      [lim_{xto0}tikzmarknode{ex}{mathrm{e}^x}left(2+4xright)~=~2]
      begin{tikzpicture}[overlay,remember picture]
      path[red] ([xshift=1pt,yshift=1pt]ex.north east) -- ++(45:{width("=")*1pt-1pt})
      node[midway,sloped]{$=$} node[above right=-2pt]{$1$};
      end{tikzpicture}
      end{document}


      enter image description here



      Arguably somewhat clearer alternatives include



      documentclass{article}
      usepackage{mathtools}
      usepackage{tikz}
      usetikzlibrary{tikzmark}
      begin{document}
      [lim_{xto0}tikzmarknode{ex}{mathrm{e}^x}left(2+4xright)~=~2]
      begin{tikzpicture}[overlay,remember picture]
      draw[red,->] ([xshift=1pt,yshift=1pt]ex.north east) --
      ++(45:{width("$scriptstyle xto0$")*1pt})
      node[midway,sloped,above]{$scriptstyle xto0$} node[above right=-1pt]{$1$};
      end{tikzpicture}
      end{document}


      enter image description here



      which illustrates what I mean by "more fancy options".






      share|improve this answer

























        up vote
        12
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        12
        down vote



        accepted






        If you only want to draw one of those, this might be a bit of an overkill, but if you plan to do several annotations of that kind and wish to have access to more fancy features, this might be a reasonable way to go.



        documentclass{article}
        usepackage{amsmath}
        usepackage{tikz}
        usetikzlibrary{tikzmark}
        begin{document}
        [lim_{xto0}tikzmarknode{ex}{mathrm{e}^x}left(2+4xright)~=~2]
        begin{tikzpicture}[overlay,remember picture]
        path[red] ([xshift=1pt,yshift=1pt]ex.north east) -- ++(45:{width("=")*1pt-1pt})
        node[midway,sloped]{$=$} node[above right=-2pt]{$1$};
        end{tikzpicture}
        end{document}


        enter image description here



        Arguably somewhat clearer alternatives include



        documentclass{article}
        usepackage{mathtools}
        usepackage{tikz}
        usetikzlibrary{tikzmark}
        begin{document}
        [lim_{xto0}tikzmarknode{ex}{mathrm{e}^x}left(2+4xright)~=~2]
        begin{tikzpicture}[overlay,remember picture]
        draw[red,->] ([xshift=1pt,yshift=1pt]ex.north east) --
        ++(45:{width("$scriptstyle xto0$")*1pt})
        node[midway,sloped,above]{$scriptstyle xto0$} node[above right=-1pt]{$1$};
        end{tikzpicture}
        end{document}


        enter image description here



        which illustrates what I mean by "more fancy options".






        share|improve this answer














        If you only want to draw one of those, this might be a bit of an overkill, but if you plan to do several annotations of that kind and wish to have access to more fancy features, this might be a reasonable way to go.



        documentclass{article}
        usepackage{amsmath}
        usepackage{tikz}
        usetikzlibrary{tikzmark}
        begin{document}
        [lim_{xto0}tikzmarknode{ex}{mathrm{e}^x}left(2+4xright)~=~2]
        begin{tikzpicture}[overlay,remember picture]
        path[red] ([xshift=1pt,yshift=1pt]ex.north east) -- ++(45:{width("=")*1pt-1pt})
        node[midway,sloped]{$=$} node[above right=-2pt]{$1$};
        end{tikzpicture}
        end{document}


        enter image description here



        Arguably somewhat clearer alternatives include



        documentclass{article}
        usepackage{mathtools}
        usepackage{tikz}
        usetikzlibrary{tikzmark}
        begin{document}
        [lim_{xto0}tikzmarknode{ex}{mathrm{e}^x}left(2+4xright)~=~2]
        begin{tikzpicture}[overlay,remember picture]
        draw[red,->] ([xshift=1pt,yshift=1pt]ex.north east) --
        ++(45:{width("$scriptstyle xto0$")*1pt})
        node[midway,sloped,above]{$scriptstyle xto0$} node[above right=-1pt]{$1$};
        end{tikzpicture}
        end{document}


        enter image description here



        which illustrates what I mean by "more fancy options".







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Nov 23 at 22:47

























        answered Nov 23 at 22:12









        marmot

        79.9k491171




        79.9k491171






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f461487%2fhow-do-i-get-a-tilted-equal-sign-for-an-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Сан-Квентин

            8-я гвардейская общевойсковая армия

            Алькесар