Pros and Cons using Mapping an FTP Drive VS FTP Client (Filezilla)











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












I want to know why would you use the other method to the other. Why use FTP Client if there is Mapping of Drive or vise versa.










share|improve this question
























  • ...What? Do you mean using something like SMB versus FTP? they're for completely different things.
    – Fake Name
    Jun 17 '10 at 5:03










  • what i mean is what benefit can you get from the other process to make your workflow faster or efficient. My concern is If you can also access your server using Mapping of Drive to manage your web files/folders why bother downloading ftp clients? I like the points of Daisetsu.
    – Pennf0lio
    Jun 17 '10 at 14:52















up vote
2
down vote

favorite












I want to know why would you use the other method to the other. Why use FTP Client if there is Mapping of Drive or vise versa.










share|improve this question
























  • ...What? Do you mean using something like SMB versus FTP? they're for completely different things.
    – Fake Name
    Jun 17 '10 at 5:03










  • what i mean is what benefit can you get from the other process to make your workflow faster or efficient. My concern is If you can also access your server using Mapping of Drive to manage your web files/folders why bother downloading ftp clients? I like the points of Daisetsu.
    – Pennf0lio
    Jun 17 '10 at 14:52













up vote
2
down vote

favorite









up vote
2
down vote

favorite











I want to know why would you use the other method to the other. Why use FTP Client if there is Mapping of Drive or vise versa.










share|improve this question















I want to know why would you use the other method to the other. Why use FTP Client if there is Mapping of Drive or vise versa.







website ftp web development upload






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Aug 19 '11 at 10:18









studiohack

11.3k1880113




11.3k1880113










asked Jun 17 '10 at 4:26









Pennf0lio

79582345




79582345












  • ...What? Do you mean using something like SMB versus FTP? they're for completely different things.
    – Fake Name
    Jun 17 '10 at 5:03










  • what i mean is what benefit can you get from the other process to make your workflow faster or efficient. My concern is If you can also access your server using Mapping of Drive to manage your web files/folders why bother downloading ftp clients? I like the points of Daisetsu.
    – Pennf0lio
    Jun 17 '10 at 14:52


















  • ...What? Do you mean using something like SMB versus FTP? they're for completely different things.
    – Fake Name
    Jun 17 '10 at 5:03










  • what i mean is what benefit can you get from the other process to make your workflow faster or efficient. My concern is If you can also access your server using Mapping of Drive to manage your web files/folders why bother downloading ftp clients? I like the points of Daisetsu.
    – Pennf0lio
    Jun 17 '10 at 14:52
















...What? Do you mean using something like SMB versus FTP? they're for completely different things.
– Fake Name
Jun 17 '10 at 5:03




...What? Do you mean using something like SMB versus FTP? they're for completely different things.
– Fake Name
Jun 17 '10 at 5:03












what i mean is what benefit can you get from the other process to make your workflow faster or efficient. My concern is If you can also access your server using Mapping of Drive to manage your web files/folders why bother downloading ftp clients? I like the points of Daisetsu.
– Pennf0lio
Jun 17 '10 at 14:52




what i mean is what benefit can you get from the other process to make your workflow faster or efficient. My concern is If you can also access your server using Mapping of Drive to manage your web files/folders why bother downloading ftp clients? I like the points of Daisetsu.
– Pennf0lio
Jun 17 '10 at 14:52










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










With a mapped drive you don't have certain extendability such as SFTP. You can also better control access such as being able to log out. You can also pause, cancel, and queue uploads/downloads along with loads of other features.



Update: There are commercial programs that map a drive and give you this level of control. Netdrive, FTPdrive and WebDrive all do this. WebDrive also lets you manage cache so the you can speed up the transfers.






share|improve this answer























  • There are commercial programs that map a drive and give you this level of control. Netdrive, FTPdrive and WebDrive all do this. WebDrive also lets you manage cache so the you can speed up the transfers.
    – user334875
    Nov 12 at 14:27






  • 1




    I'm guessing those solutions were created after 2010 when I answered this question. You can always edit my answer to include new info by clicking the "improve this answer" link next to the answer and submitting an edit, or by adding your own answer. Not everyone reads the comments unfortunately.
    – Daisetsu
    Nov 12 at 15:50











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "3"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f153504%2fpros-and-cons-using-mapping-an-ftp-drive-vs-ftp-client-filezilla%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
1
down vote



accepted










With a mapped drive you don't have certain extendability such as SFTP. You can also better control access such as being able to log out. You can also pause, cancel, and queue uploads/downloads along with loads of other features.



Update: There are commercial programs that map a drive and give you this level of control. Netdrive, FTPdrive and WebDrive all do this. WebDrive also lets you manage cache so the you can speed up the transfers.






share|improve this answer























  • There are commercial programs that map a drive and give you this level of control. Netdrive, FTPdrive and WebDrive all do this. WebDrive also lets you manage cache so the you can speed up the transfers.
    – user334875
    Nov 12 at 14:27






  • 1




    I'm guessing those solutions were created after 2010 when I answered this question. You can always edit my answer to include new info by clicking the "improve this answer" link next to the answer and submitting an edit, or by adding your own answer. Not everyone reads the comments unfortunately.
    – Daisetsu
    Nov 12 at 15:50















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










With a mapped drive you don't have certain extendability such as SFTP. You can also better control access such as being able to log out. You can also pause, cancel, and queue uploads/downloads along with loads of other features.



Update: There are commercial programs that map a drive and give you this level of control. Netdrive, FTPdrive and WebDrive all do this. WebDrive also lets you manage cache so the you can speed up the transfers.






share|improve this answer























  • There are commercial programs that map a drive and give you this level of control. Netdrive, FTPdrive and WebDrive all do this. WebDrive also lets you manage cache so the you can speed up the transfers.
    – user334875
    Nov 12 at 14:27






  • 1




    I'm guessing those solutions were created after 2010 when I answered this question. You can always edit my answer to include new info by clicking the "improve this answer" link next to the answer and submitting an edit, or by adding your own answer. Not everyone reads the comments unfortunately.
    – Daisetsu
    Nov 12 at 15:50













up vote
1
down vote



accepted







up vote
1
down vote



accepted






With a mapped drive you don't have certain extendability such as SFTP. You can also better control access such as being able to log out. You can also pause, cancel, and queue uploads/downloads along with loads of other features.



Update: There are commercial programs that map a drive and give you this level of control. Netdrive, FTPdrive and WebDrive all do this. WebDrive also lets you manage cache so the you can speed up the transfers.






share|improve this answer














With a mapped drive you don't have certain extendability such as SFTP. You can also better control access such as being able to log out. You can also pause, cancel, and queue uploads/downloads along with loads of other features.



Update: There are commercial programs that map a drive and give you this level of control. Netdrive, FTPdrive and WebDrive all do this. WebDrive also lets you manage cache so the you can speed up the transfers.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Nov 17 at 3:53









user334875

353136




353136










answered Jun 17 '10 at 5:05









Daisetsu

4,74942842




4,74942842












  • There are commercial programs that map a drive and give you this level of control. Netdrive, FTPdrive and WebDrive all do this. WebDrive also lets you manage cache so the you can speed up the transfers.
    – user334875
    Nov 12 at 14:27






  • 1




    I'm guessing those solutions were created after 2010 when I answered this question. You can always edit my answer to include new info by clicking the "improve this answer" link next to the answer and submitting an edit, or by adding your own answer. Not everyone reads the comments unfortunately.
    – Daisetsu
    Nov 12 at 15:50


















  • There are commercial programs that map a drive and give you this level of control. Netdrive, FTPdrive and WebDrive all do this. WebDrive also lets you manage cache so the you can speed up the transfers.
    – user334875
    Nov 12 at 14:27






  • 1




    I'm guessing those solutions were created after 2010 when I answered this question. You can always edit my answer to include new info by clicking the "improve this answer" link next to the answer and submitting an edit, or by adding your own answer. Not everyone reads the comments unfortunately.
    – Daisetsu
    Nov 12 at 15:50
















There are commercial programs that map a drive and give you this level of control. Netdrive, FTPdrive and WebDrive all do this. WebDrive also lets you manage cache so the you can speed up the transfers.
– user334875
Nov 12 at 14:27




There are commercial programs that map a drive and give you this level of control. Netdrive, FTPdrive and WebDrive all do this. WebDrive also lets you manage cache so the you can speed up the transfers.
– user334875
Nov 12 at 14:27




1




1




I'm guessing those solutions were created after 2010 when I answered this question. You can always edit my answer to include new info by clicking the "improve this answer" link next to the answer and submitting an edit, or by adding your own answer. Not everyone reads the comments unfortunately.
– Daisetsu
Nov 12 at 15:50




I'm guessing those solutions were created after 2010 when I answered this question. You can always edit my answer to include new info by clicking the "improve this answer" link next to the answer and submitting an edit, or by adding your own answer. Not everyone reads the comments unfortunately.
– Daisetsu
Nov 12 at 15:50


















 

draft saved


draft discarded



















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f153504%2fpros-and-cons-using-mapping-an-ftp-drive-vs-ftp-client-filezilla%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Terni

A new problem with tex4ht and tikz

Sun Ra