Pros and Cons using Mapping an FTP Drive VS FTP Client (Filezilla)
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I want to know why would you use the other method to the other. Why use FTP Client if there is Mapping of Drive or vise versa.
website ftp web development upload
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I want to know why would you use the other method to the other. Why use FTP Client if there is Mapping of Drive or vise versa.
website ftp web development upload
...What? Do you mean using something like SMB versus FTP? they're for completely different things.
– Fake Name
Jun 17 '10 at 5:03
what i mean is what benefit can you get from the other process to make your workflow faster or efficient. My concern is If you can also access your server using Mapping of Drive to manage your web files/folders why bother downloading ftp clients? I like the points of Daisetsu.
– Pennf0lio
Jun 17 '10 at 14:52
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I want to know why would you use the other method to the other. Why use FTP Client if there is Mapping of Drive or vise versa.
website ftp web development upload
I want to know why would you use the other method to the other. Why use FTP Client if there is Mapping of Drive or vise versa.
website ftp web development upload
website ftp web development upload
edited Aug 19 '11 at 10:18
studiohack♦
11.3k1880113
11.3k1880113
asked Jun 17 '10 at 4:26
Pennf0lio
79582345
79582345
...What? Do you mean using something like SMB versus FTP? they're for completely different things.
– Fake Name
Jun 17 '10 at 5:03
what i mean is what benefit can you get from the other process to make your workflow faster or efficient. My concern is If you can also access your server using Mapping of Drive to manage your web files/folders why bother downloading ftp clients? I like the points of Daisetsu.
– Pennf0lio
Jun 17 '10 at 14:52
add a comment |
...What? Do you mean using something like SMB versus FTP? they're for completely different things.
– Fake Name
Jun 17 '10 at 5:03
what i mean is what benefit can you get from the other process to make your workflow faster or efficient. My concern is If you can also access your server using Mapping of Drive to manage your web files/folders why bother downloading ftp clients? I like the points of Daisetsu.
– Pennf0lio
Jun 17 '10 at 14:52
...What? Do you mean using something like SMB versus FTP? they're for completely different things.
– Fake Name
Jun 17 '10 at 5:03
...What? Do you mean using something like SMB versus FTP? they're for completely different things.
– Fake Name
Jun 17 '10 at 5:03
what i mean is what benefit can you get from the other process to make your workflow faster or efficient. My concern is If you can also access your server using Mapping of Drive to manage your web files/folders why bother downloading ftp clients? I like the points of Daisetsu.
– Pennf0lio
Jun 17 '10 at 14:52
what i mean is what benefit can you get from the other process to make your workflow faster or efficient. My concern is If you can also access your server using Mapping of Drive to manage your web files/folders why bother downloading ftp clients? I like the points of Daisetsu.
– Pennf0lio
Jun 17 '10 at 14:52
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
With a mapped drive you don't have certain extendability such as SFTP. You can also better control access such as being able to log out. You can also pause, cancel, and queue uploads/downloads along with loads of other features.
Update: There are commercial programs that map a drive and give you this level of control. Netdrive, FTPdrive and WebDrive all do this. WebDrive also lets you manage cache so the you can speed up the transfers.
There are commercial programs that map a drive and give you this level of control. Netdrive, FTPdrive and WebDrive all do this. WebDrive also lets you manage cache so the you can speed up the transfers.
– user334875
Nov 12 at 14:27
1
I'm guessing those solutions were created after 2010 when I answered this question. You can always edit my answer to include new info by clicking the "improve this answer" link next to the answer and submitting an edit, or by adding your own answer. Not everyone reads the comments unfortunately.
– Daisetsu
Nov 12 at 15:50
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
With a mapped drive you don't have certain extendability such as SFTP. You can also better control access such as being able to log out. You can also pause, cancel, and queue uploads/downloads along with loads of other features.
Update: There are commercial programs that map a drive and give you this level of control. Netdrive, FTPdrive and WebDrive all do this. WebDrive also lets you manage cache so the you can speed up the transfers.
There are commercial programs that map a drive and give you this level of control. Netdrive, FTPdrive and WebDrive all do this. WebDrive also lets you manage cache so the you can speed up the transfers.
– user334875
Nov 12 at 14:27
1
I'm guessing those solutions were created after 2010 when I answered this question. You can always edit my answer to include new info by clicking the "improve this answer" link next to the answer and submitting an edit, or by adding your own answer. Not everyone reads the comments unfortunately.
– Daisetsu
Nov 12 at 15:50
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
With a mapped drive you don't have certain extendability such as SFTP. You can also better control access such as being able to log out. You can also pause, cancel, and queue uploads/downloads along with loads of other features.
Update: There are commercial programs that map a drive and give you this level of control. Netdrive, FTPdrive and WebDrive all do this. WebDrive also lets you manage cache so the you can speed up the transfers.
There are commercial programs that map a drive and give you this level of control. Netdrive, FTPdrive and WebDrive all do this. WebDrive also lets you manage cache so the you can speed up the transfers.
– user334875
Nov 12 at 14:27
1
I'm guessing those solutions were created after 2010 when I answered this question. You can always edit my answer to include new info by clicking the "improve this answer" link next to the answer and submitting an edit, or by adding your own answer. Not everyone reads the comments unfortunately.
– Daisetsu
Nov 12 at 15:50
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
With a mapped drive you don't have certain extendability such as SFTP. You can also better control access such as being able to log out. You can also pause, cancel, and queue uploads/downloads along with loads of other features.
Update: There are commercial programs that map a drive and give you this level of control. Netdrive, FTPdrive and WebDrive all do this. WebDrive also lets you manage cache so the you can speed up the transfers.
With a mapped drive you don't have certain extendability such as SFTP. You can also better control access such as being able to log out. You can also pause, cancel, and queue uploads/downloads along with loads of other features.
Update: There are commercial programs that map a drive and give you this level of control. Netdrive, FTPdrive and WebDrive all do this. WebDrive also lets you manage cache so the you can speed up the transfers.
edited Nov 17 at 3:53
user334875
353136
353136
answered Jun 17 '10 at 5:05
Daisetsu
4,74942842
4,74942842
There are commercial programs that map a drive and give you this level of control. Netdrive, FTPdrive and WebDrive all do this. WebDrive also lets you manage cache so the you can speed up the transfers.
– user334875
Nov 12 at 14:27
1
I'm guessing those solutions were created after 2010 when I answered this question. You can always edit my answer to include new info by clicking the "improve this answer" link next to the answer and submitting an edit, or by adding your own answer. Not everyone reads the comments unfortunately.
– Daisetsu
Nov 12 at 15:50
add a comment |
There are commercial programs that map a drive and give you this level of control. Netdrive, FTPdrive and WebDrive all do this. WebDrive also lets you manage cache so the you can speed up the transfers.
– user334875
Nov 12 at 14:27
1
I'm guessing those solutions were created after 2010 when I answered this question. You can always edit my answer to include new info by clicking the "improve this answer" link next to the answer and submitting an edit, or by adding your own answer. Not everyone reads the comments unfortunately.
– Daisetsu
Nov 12 at 15:50
There are commercial programs that map a drive and give you this level of control. Netdrive, FTPdrive and WebDrive all do this. WebDrive also lets you manage cache so the you can speed up the transfers.
– user334875
Nov 12 at 14:27
There are commercial programs that map a drive and give you this level of control. Netdrive, FTPdrive and WebDrive all do this. WebDrive also lets you manage cache so the you can speed up the transfers.
– user334875
Nov 12 at 14:27
1
1
I'm guessing those solutions were created after 2010 when I answered this question. You can always edit my answer to include new info by clicking the "improve this answer" link next to the answer and submitting an edit, or by adding your own answer. Not everyone reads the comments unfortunately.
– Daisetsu
Nov 12 at 15:50
I'm guessing those solutions were created after 2010 when I answered this question. You can always edit my answer to include new info by clicking the "improve this answer" link next to the answer and submitting an edit, or by adding your own answer. Not everyone reads the comments unfortunately.
– Daisetsu
Nov 12 at 15:50
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f153504%2fpros-and-cons-using-mapping-an-ftp-drive-vs-ftp-client-filezilla%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
...What? Do you mean using something like SMB versus FTP? they're for completely different things.
– Fake Name
Jun 17 '10 at 5:03
what i mean is what benefit can you get from the other process to make your workflow faster or efficient. My concern is If you can also access your server using Mapping of Drive to manage your web files/folders why bother downloading ftp clients? I like the points of Daisetsu.
– Pennf0lio
Jun 17 '10 at 14:52