GFortran with Visual Studio 2010 as IDE
My machine is WIN7 64 bit.
Could I use GFortran with Visual Studio 2010?
i.e. can I use the visual studio as an IDE for gfortran?
visual-studio-2010 ide
add a comment |
My machine is WIN7 64 bit.
Could I use GFortran with Visual Studio 2010?
i.e. can I use the visual studio as an IDE for gfortran?
visual-studio-2010 ide
add a comment |
My machine is WIN7 64 bit.
Could I use GFortran with Visual Studio 2010?
i.e. can I use the visual studio as an IDE for gfortran?
visual-studio-2010 ide
My machine is WIN7 64 bit.
Could I use GFortran with Visual Studio 2010?
i.e. can I use the visual studio as an IDE for gfortran?
visual-studio-2010 ide
visual-studio-2010 ide
edited Mar 30 '11 at 22:23
ChrisF
38.4k1388139
38.4k1388139
asked Oct 23 '10 at 15:32
johnjohn
612
612
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
No, not that I am aware of.
You can of course edit the source code in Visual Studio as regular text files, but what would be the point of that?
If you want to use Visual Studio as an IDE, then you should buy Intel Visual Fortran Composer XE.
If you want to use gfortran as a compiler, then you should download Photran.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "3"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f202653%2fgfortran-with-visual-studio-2010-as-ide%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
No, not that I am aware of.
You can of course edit the source code in Visual Studio as regular text files, but what would be the point of that?
If you want to use Visual Studio as an IDE, then you should buy Intel Visual Fortran Composer XE.
If you want to use gfortran as a compiler, then you should download Photran.
add a comment |
No, not that I am aware of.
You can of course edit the source code in Visual Studio as regular text files, but what would be the point of that?
If you want to use Visual Studio as an IDE, then you should buy Intel Visual Fortran Composer XE.
If you want to use gfortran as a compiler, then you should download Photran.
add a comment |
No, not that I am aware of.
You can of course edit the source code in Visual Studio as regular text files, but what would be the point of that?
If you want to use Visual Studio as an IDE, then you should buy Intel Visual Fortran Composer XE.
If you want to use gfortran as a compiler, then you should download Photran.
No, not that I am aware of.
You can of course edit the source code in Visual Studio as regular text files, but what would be the point of that?
If you want to use Visual Studio as an IDE, then you should buy Intel Visual Fortran Composer XE.
If you want to use gfortran as a compiler, then you should download Photran.
answered Mar 4 '11 at 20:19
RolKauRolKau
791513
791513
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f202653%2fgfortran-with-visual-studio-2010-as-ide%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown