What is the purpose of Boarding Points on Indian railways tickets?












33















In most of the world, if you want to travel from A to B, you buy a ticket from A to B and that's it.



However, in India, it's possible to buy a ticket from X to B, designate a Boarding Point in A somewhere along the way, and board the train at A. Makemytrip explains how this works:




What is a boarding point?



You can choose a boarding point, from where you will board the train.
This can be any station between the Reservation From station and
Reservation Upto station. By default, you Reservation From station is
also your boarding point.



While you may choose a boarding point as any station on the route of
the train, you would have to pay the fare as applicable for
Reservation From – Reservation To stations. For example, if you are
booking a ticket from Mumbai Central to New Delhi and choose the
boarding point as Kota Jn, then you can board the train only at Kota
Jn and not between Mumbai Central and Kota Jn. You would however have
to pay the fare for Mumbai Central to New Delhi




The question left unanswered is why would you want to do this? It would seem much more logical and cheaper to just buy a ticket from Kota Jn to New Delhi.






trains tickets india irctc







share|improve this question


















  • 1





    If I travel from just outside of town A to town B, it is likely my seat can not be sold for the short distance I am not in the train. Hence charging me the same as someone going from town A to town B makes sence. (then think how a seat booking system could work before computers)

    – Ian Ringrose
    yesterday






  • 3





    @IanRingrose The railway can organize itself internally however it wants. If they want to reserve my seat from A to B, instead of just-outside-A to B, they're welcome to do that. And they're within their rights to set their pricing structure so that it charges me for the probably-unusable seat. But all of that is internal to the railway and it doesn't answer the question. The question is why they let the customer do these things, when doing them seems to be to the customer's disadvantage.

    – David Richerby
    yesterday


















33















In most of the world, if you want to travel from A to B, you buy a ticket from A to B and that's it.



However, in India, it's possible to buy a ticket from X to B, designate a Boarding Point in A somewhere along the way, and board the train at A. Makemytrip explains how this works:




What is a boarding point?



You can choose a boarding point, from where you will board the train.
This can be any station between the Reservation From station and
Reservation Upto station. By default, you Reservation From station is
also your boarding point.



While you may choose a boarding point as any station on the route of
the train, you would have to pay the fare as applicable for
Reservation From – Reservation To stations. For example, if you are
booking a ticket from Mumbai Central to New Delhi and choose the
boarding point as Kota Jn, then you can board the train only at Kota
Jn and not between Mumbai Central and Kota Jn. You would however have
to pay the fare for Mumbai Central to New Delhi




The question left unanswered is why would you want to do this? It would seem much more logical and cheaper to just buy a ticket from Kota Jn to New Delhi.






trains tickets india irctc







share|improve this question


















  • 1





    If I travel from just outside of town A to town B, it is likely my seat can not be sold for the short distance I am not in the train. Hence charging me the same as someone going from town A to town B makes sence. (then think how a seat booking system could work before computers)

    – Ian Ringrose
    yesterday






  • 3





    @IanRingrose The railway can organize itself internally however it wants. If they want to reserve my seat from A to B, instead of just-outside-A to B, they're welcome to do that. And they're within their rights to set their pricing structure so that it charges me for the probably-unusable seat. But all of that is internal to the railway and it doesn't answer the question. The question is why they let the customer do these things, when doing them seems to be to the customer's disadvantage.

    – David Richerby
    yesterday
















33












33








33


1






In most of the world, if you want to travel from A to B, you buy a ticket from A to B and that's it.



However, in India, it's possible to buy a ticket from X to B, designate a Boarding Point in A somewhere along the way, and board the train at A. Makemytrip explains how this works:




What is a boarding point?



You can choose a boarding point, from where you will board the train.
This can be any station between the Reservation From station and
Reservation Upto station. By default, you Reservation From station is
also your boarding point.



While you may choose a boarding point as any station on the route of
the train, you would have to pay the fare as applicable for
Reservation From – Reservation To stations. For example, if you are
booking a ticket from Mumbai Central to New Delhi and choose the
boarding point as Kota Jn, then you can board the train only at Kota
Jn and not between Mumbai Central and Kota Jn. You would however have
to pay the fare for Mumbai Central to New Delhi




The question left unanswered is why would you want to do this? It would seem much more logical and cheaper to just buy a ticket from Kota Jn to New Delhi.






trains tickets india irctc







share|improve this question














In most of the world, if you want to travel from A to B, you buy a ticket from A to B and that's it.



However, in India, it's possible to buy a ticket from X to B, designate a Boarding Point in A somewhere along the way, and board the train at A. Makemytrip explains how this works:




What is a boarding point?



You can choose a boarding point, from where you will board the train.
This can be any station between the Reservation From station and
Reservation Upto station. By default, you Reservation From station is
also your boarding point.



While you may choose a boarding point as any station on the route of
the train, you would have to pay the fare as applicable for
Reservation From – Reservation To stations. For example, if you are
booking a ticket from Mumbai Central to New Delhi and choose the
boarding point as Kota Jn, then you can board the train only at Kota
Jn and not between Mumbai Central and Kota Jn. You would however have
to pay the fare for Mumbai Central to New Delhi




The question left unanswered is why would you want to do this? It would seem much more logical and cheaper to just buy a ticket from Kota Jn to New Delhi.






trains tickets india irctc




trains tickets india irctc






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 2 days ago









jpatokaljpatokal

114k17350511




114k17350511








  • 1





    If I travel from just outside of town A to town B, it is likely my seat can not be sold for the short distance I am not in the train. Hence charging me the same as someone going from town A to town B makes sence. (then think how a seat booking system could work before computers)

    – Ian Ringrose
    yesterday






  • 3





    @IanRingrose The railway can organize itself internally however it wants. If they want to reserve my seat from A to B, instead of just-outside-A to B, they're welcome to do that. And they're within their rights to set their pricing structure so that it charges me for the probably-unusable seat. But all of that is internal to the railway and it doesn't answer the question. The question is why they let the customer do these things, when doing them seems to be to the customer's disadvantage.

    – David Richerby
    yesterday
















  • 1





    If I travel from just outside of town A to town B, it is likely my seat can not be sold for the short distance I am not in the train. Hence charging me the same as someone going from town A to town B makes sence. (then think how a seat booking system could work before computers)

    – Ian Ringrose
    yesterday






  • 3





    @IanRingrose The railway can organize itself internally however it wants. If they want to reserve my seat from A to B, instead of just-outside-A to B, they're welcome to do that. And they're within their rights to set their pricing structure so that it charges me for the probably-unusable seat. But all of that is internal to the railway and it doesn't answer the question. The question is why they let the customer do these things, when doing them seems to be to the customer's disadvantage.

    – David Richerby
    yesterday










1




1





If I travel from just outside of town A to town B, it is likely my seat can not be sold for the short distance I am not in the train. Hence charging me the same as someone going from town A to town B makes sence. (then think how a seat booking system could work before computers)

– Ian Ringrose
yesterday





If I travel from just outside of town A to town B, it is likely my seat can not be sold for the short distance I am not in the train. Hence charging me the same as someone going from town A to town B makes sence. (then think how a seat booking system could work before computers)

– Ian Ringrose
yesterday




3




3





@IanRingrose The railway can organize itself internally however it wants. If they want to reserve my seat from A to B, instead of just-outside-A to B, they're welcome to do that. And they're within their rights to set their pricing structure so that it charges me for the probably-unusable seat. But all of that is internal to the railway and it doesn't answer the question. The question is why they let the customer do these things, when doing them seems to be to the customer's disadvantage.

– David Richerby
yesterday







@IanRingrose The railway can organize itself internally however it wants. If they want to reserve my seat from A to B, instead of just-outside-A to B, they're welcome to do that. And they're within their rights to set their pricing structure so that it charges me for the probably-unusable seat. But all of that is internal to the railway and it doesn't answer the question. The question is why they let the customer do these things, when doing them seems to be to the customer's disadvantage.

– David Richerby
yesterday












5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















22














You can change boarding point any time you like after booking the ticket, so that you don't have to cancel the ticket and buy another.



Railway will cancel your ticket if they can't find you in a fixed number of stops and will assign your reserved seat to a person who boarded the train with waiting list ticket.



Also, some stations will have a fixed quota of tatkal tickets. If train runs from X-A-B, where A is a popular station where people are more likely to take the ticket and run out of quota, it makes sensible to take ticket from X-B and change boarding station to A, afterwards. (Source: My friend who is expert at ticketing)






share|improve this answer
























  • What happens if I don't assign the boarding point but still board? Will I just lose the seat, or will my ticket be invalidated completely?

    – Dmitry Grigoryev
    yesterday






  • 5





    +1 Another use case is trying to beat the quota system of Indian Railways. X-A-B ticket is under General Quota so more tickets are available but A-B ticket is under Pooled Quota so less tickets are available. It is sensible to buy X-B and set boarding point as A even though it is costlier because you have more chances of getting a confirmed ticket.

    – RedBaron
    yesterday






  • 2





    @DmitryGrigoryev You will just loose the seat.

    – Anish Sheela
    yesterday






  • 9





    This is completely insane. If I want to go from A to B, I would buy a ticket from A to B and not from X to B just because the damn railway company can't manage the seats properly!

    – ElmoVanKielmo
    yesterday



















8














Recently I found this Boarding point feature very useful.



I was booking ticket in Rajdhani from A to B but it was giving me error "BOOKING NOT ALLOWED FOR GIVEN PAIR OF STATIONS". The reason for this error is "If you're trying to book a ticket for a short journey on a train that travels a long distance, you might encounter this error message."



So I booked ticket from X(Source station which is just two station before A) to B and changed my boarding to A.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




Vivart is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 5





    But a better solution would be to just let you book what you wanted! Presumably, they don't want people booking short journeys on long-distance trains because that would deny a seat to somebody who books later but wants to travel long-distance. But forcing you to take up a seat for more distance than you're using it makes that problem worse, not better!

    – David Richerby
    yesterday






  • 1





    This train is premium fast train with food on-board, Covering 2k km with 26 stoppage. So I think it will not be profitable or a good experience if they allow reservation between every station. If you really want ticket for A->B there are many other trains also.

    – Vivart
    yesterday













  • Sure, but there are better ways of discouraging reservations for short journeys on long-distance trains. They could just ban reservations for short journeys, for example. They could say "Tickets from A to B are not valid on the long-distance express."

    – David Richerby
    yesterday











  • yeah sure but in my case other trains timing were not matching with my schedule but this train timing was matching perfectly and as a plus point it's fastest in all other trains so I didn't mind to book for extra stations and changed boarding point.

    – Vivart
    yesterday



















4














In Indian Railways there is a system called Reservation Against Cancellation or RAC. This is, let us say there are 700 seats in a train, then 750 people can book the ticket and board that particular train. A few seats (one per compartment) will be given to two people instead of one. So basically two people are alotted to the same seat. Now let us say someone did not board the train. Then the conductor will allocate that seat to one of the person who is under RAC.



Now let us say, you booked a ticket from Mumbai, and decided to boared from Kota; the problem now is, when the conductor comes, you have not boarded from Mumbai and your seat will be allocated to the guy under RAC. To prevent this from happening you have to change your boarding point to Kota, so that the conductor knows that you didn't miss the train but will instead board from Kota, and your seat won't be allocated to someone else.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




illiteratewriter is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 5





    This wouldn't have happen if you've just bought a ticket from Kota Jn to New Delhi, as jpatokal suggested.

    – Dmitry Grigoryev
    yesterday











  • @DmitryGrigoryev that happens when you want to change your boarding point only. By default if you book a ticket from Mumbai to Delhi, your boarding point will be Mumbai, and if you don't board from there, your ticket will be cancelled.

    – illiteratewriter
    yesterday








  • 3





    This is completely insane. If I want to go from A to B, I would buy a ticket from A to B and not from X to B just because the damn railway company can't manage the seats properly!

    – ElmoVanKielmo
    yesterday






  • 2





    First I thought - insane, but then I realized it is exactly what happens all over the world with plane tickets. In the train, at least you can stand in the corridor if there are no seats left...

    – Artur Biesiadowski
    yesterday






  • 1





    @ElmoVanKielmo, this is a combination of the "overbooking" and "standby travel" procedures that nearly every airline in the world uses. And from the viewpoint of the railroad, it makes perfect sense: if rail travel is anything like airline travel, about 15% of ticketed passengers won't show up, so selling more tickets than you have seats gives you a substantial increase in profit.

    – Mark
    yesterday



















4














Indian trains cover very large distances over multiple days and have various stoppages along the way. The reservations are usually done at least 2-3 months in advance and for this reason, having a little bit of flexibility in case of change of plans is very useful and convenient for the people.



Instead of canceling the entire ticket and trying to re-book it from a new station along the way, it becomes handy to just change the boarding point while still having a confirmed ticket in hand.



It might surprise some but the volume of people that travel in Indian trains every day is so huge that some people do not get confirmed seats even if they book well in advance. The ticketing system is very advanced and is designed based on the traffic which means that if X-B is a more popular travel route, more percent of seats will be allotted for this route on a particular train than A-B. It is referred to as quota but it is just based on traffic. Any tickets being booked from X-B will have more probability of a confirmed reservation than A-B.



For this reason, people sometimes knowingly book tickets from a different station even if it costs more. Also, the entire reservation system is transparent so at the time of booking, you can very well see if there are seats left on A-B route or not and then book from X-B in case the seats are taken. You can still get a wait-list ticket for A-B but that will be a risk because then your confirmation will depend on somebody else canceling their A-B tickets for more seats to open up.






share|improve this answer

































    3














    Consider a train with 150 seats. Consider the route has 3 stations A-X-B. A is the starting point and the larger and popular station, so it is assigned more seats for reservation. Consider it to be



    A: 125 seats

    X: 25 seats



    Logically, there are more chances of getting a confirmed ticket for the route A-B than X-B.



    Indian Railways sells a lot more tickets than the number of seats on the train, so the ticket you buy can be in Confirmed,RAC or Waiting status.





    • Confirmed - You have a seat number and a bed assigned


    • RAC - Your ticket would be in RAC if all the seats have been sold off. This mean you can get into the train and sit in some
      seat assigned by the TC, but you would only get a bed if someone
      with a confirmed seat cancels their ticket or fails to turn up
      in the train at their boarding point      .


    • Waiting List - This means all the Confirmed and RAC tickets have been completed and you are on a wait-list. You are not allowed to board the train with a ticket in this status. Your status might change
      daily until the day of departure depending on the number of
      Confimred/RAC passengers cancelling their tickets.


    So, I can buy a ticket for A-B and put the boarding point as X, in the following scenarios:




    1. I want to have a better probability of getting a Confirmed ticket
      rather than a RAC/Wait-listed ticket and I don't mind the extra
      charge I pay for my lesser distance.
      If I just buy a ticket from A-B without specifying any boarding point
      and try to board at X, I would be marked as a no-show and my seat
      would've already be given to some RAC passenger.
      So the proper
      procedure of booking would be to buy a ticket for A-B with boarding
      point as X. This makes sure I have my seat and bed free when I board in station X.


    2. I had originally intended to travel from A-B, but later changed my
      plans and want to board the train at X. If I cancel the whole ticket
      and try to buy a new ticket for X-B, I might get a Wait-listed
      ticket. Hence, I keep my existing Confirmed ticket and just change
      the Boarding point to X.







    share|improve this answer










    New contributor




    CoralReef is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.





















    • Not shooting the messenger, of course, but if people who live in X have a higher chance of getting a seat from A's quota than their own, that says that the quotas are set at the wrong level! This isn't helping people from X: it's screwing them over by making them buy tickets from A. Indeed, why have quotas at all? If there are 150 seats on the train and five times as many people want to travel from A as from X then, with no quota system at all (just reserved seats and standbys), you will naturally end up with about 125 people from A and 25 people from X on each train.

      – David Richerby
      5 hours ago











    • @DavidRicherby This is my interpretation, so a pinch of salt disclaimer. The purpose of a quota is to guarantee some seats for X (which is usually a smaller intermediate town along the way). If there is a waiting list for both the quotas, it is your call whether to add yourself to the list for the smaller or the bigger quota. I presume that at the time of charting (couple of hours before the journey when these things are settled), they will automatically clear waiting lists across quotas if one is full and the other is not. Presumably this also allows them to optimize on seat occupancy.

      – Ankush Jain
      4 hours ago











    • Another example, if on a long distance train (A-X-Y-B) a particular intermediate section (X-Y) is very popular, those travellers are competing against longer distance travellers (A-B). The cap for X-Y can be set to roughly match the demand of A-X and Y-B, so that all cities have some shot at a reservation, and coach occupancy is not affected. If you want to travel on X-Y but are willing to pay for A-B, well that's a special case. With hundreds of trains having 50-odd stops, these things do add up.

      – Ankush Jain
      4 hours ago













    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "273"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftravel.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f129950%2fwhat-is-the-purpose-of-boarding-points-on-indian-railways-tickets%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    5 Answers
    5






    active

    oldest

    votes








    5 Answers
    5






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    22














    You can change boarding point any time you like after booking the ticket, so that you don't have to cancel the ticket and buy another.



    Railway will cancel your ticket if they can't find you in a fixed number of stops and will assign your reserved seat to a person who boarded the train with waiting list ticket.



    Also, some stations will have a fixed quota of tatkal tickets. If train runs from X-A-B, where A is a popular station where people are more likely to take the ticket and run out of quota, it makes sensible to take ticket from X-B and change boarding station to A, afterwards. (Source: My friend who is expert at ticketing)






    share|improve this answer
























    • What happens if I don't assign the boarding point but still board? Will I just lose the seat, or will my ticket be invalidated completely?

      – Dmitry Grigoryev
      yesterday






    • 5





      +1 Another use case is trying to beat the quota system of Indian Railways. X-A-B ticket is under General Quota so more tickets are available but A-B ticket is under Pooled Quota so less tickets are available. It is sensible to buy X-B and set boarding point as A even though it is costlier because you have more chances of getting a confirmed ticket.

      – RedBaron
      yesterday






    • 2





      @DmitryGrigoryev You will just loose the seat.

      – Anish Sheela
      yesterday






    • 9





      This is completely insane. If I want to go from A to B, I would buy a ticket from A to B and not from X to B just because the damn railway company can't manage the seats properly!

      – ElmoVanKielmo
      yesterday
















    22














    You can change boarding point any time you like after booking the ticket, so that you don't have to cancel the ticket and buy another.



    Railway will cancel your ticket if they can't find you in a fixed number of stops and will assign your reserved seat to a person who boarded the train with waiting list ticket.



    Also, some stations will have a fixed quota of tatkal tickets. If train runs from X-A-B, where A is a popular station where people are more likely to take the ticket and run out of quota, it makes sensible to take ticket from X-B and change boarding station to A, afterwards. (Source: My friend who is expert at ticketing)






    share|improve this answer
























    • What happens if I don't assign the boarding point but still board? Will I just lose the seat, or will my ticket be invalidated completely?

      – Dmitry Grigoryev
      yesterday






    • 5





      +1 Another use case is trying to beat the quota system of Indian Railways. X-A-B ticket is under General Quota so more tickets are available but A-B ticket is under Pooled Quota so less tickets are available. It is sensible to buy X-B and set boarding point as A even though it is costlier because you have more chances of getting a confirmed ticket.

      – RedBaron
      yesterday






    • 2





      @DmitryGrigoryev You will just loose the seat.

      – Anish Sheela
      yesterday






    • 9





      This is completely insane. If I want to go from A to B, I would buy a ticket from A to B and not from X to B just because the damn railway company can't manage the seats properly!

      – ElmoVanKielmo
      yesterday














    22












    22








    22







    You can change boarding point any time you like after booking the ticket, so that you don't have to cancel the ticket and buy another.



    Railway will cancel your ticket if they can't find you in a fixed number of stops and will assign your reserved seat to a person who boarded the train with waiting list ticket.



    Also, some stations will have a fixed quota of tatkal tickets. If train runs from X-A-B, where A is a popular station where people are more likely to take the ticket and run out of quota, it makes sensible to take ticket from X-B and change boarding station to A, afterwards. (Source: My friend who is expert at ticketing)






    share|improve this answer













    You can change boarding point any time you like after booking the ticket, so that you don't have to cancel the ticket and buy another.



    Railway will cancel your ticket if they can't find you in a fixed number of stops and will assign your reserved seat to a person who boarded the train with waiting list ticket.



    Also, some stations will have a fixed quota of tatkal tickets. If train runs from X-A-B, where A is a popular station where people are more likely to take the ticket and run out of quota, it makes sensible to take ticket from X-B and change boarding station to A, afterwards. (Source: My friend who is expert at ticketing)







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered yesterday









    Anish SheelaAnish Sheela

    56728




    56728













    • What happens if I don't assign the boarding point but still board? Will I just lose the seat, or will my ticket be invalidated completely?

      – Dmitry Grigoryev
      yesterday






    • 5





      +1 Another use case is trying to beat the quota system of Indian Railways. X-A-B ticket is under General Quota so more tickets are available but A-B ticket is under Pooled Quota so less tickets are available. It is sensible to buy X-B and set boarding point as A even though it is costlier because you have more chances of getting a confirmed ticket.

      – RedBaron
      yesterday






    • 2





      @DmitryGrigoryev You will just loose the seat.

      – Anish Sheela
      yesterday






    • 9





      This is completely insane. If I want to go from A to B, I would buy a ticket from A to B and not from X to B just because the damn railway company can't manage the seats properly!

      – ElmoVanKielmo
      yesterday



















    • What happens if I don't assign the boarding point but still board? Will I just lose the seat, or will my ticket be invalidated completely?

      – Dmitry Grigoryev
      yesterday






    • 5





      +1 Another use case is trying to beat the quota system of Indian Railways. X-A-B ticket is under General Quota so more tickets are available but A-B ticket is under Pooled Quota so less tickets are available. It is sensible to buy X-B and set boarding point as A even though it is costlier because you have more chances of getting a confirmed ticket.

      – RedBaron
      yesterday






    • 2





      @DmitryGrigoryev You will just loose the seat.

      – Anish Sheela
      yesterday






    • 9





      This is completely insane. If I want to go from A to B, I would buy a ticket from A to B and not from X to B just because the damn railway company can't manage the seats properly!

      – ElmoVanKielmo
      yesterday

















    What happens if I don't assign the boarding point but still board? Will I just lose the seat, or will my ticket be invalidated completely?

    – Dmitry Grigoryev
    yesterday





    What happens if I don't assign the boarding point but still board? Will I just lose the seat, or will my ticket be invalidated completely?

    – Dmitry Grigoryev
    yesterday




    5




    5





    +1 Another use case is trying to beat the quota system of Indian Railways. X-A-B ticket is under General Quota so more tickets are available but A-B ticket is under Pooled Quota so less tickets are available. It is sensible to buy X-B and set boarding point as A even though it is costlier because you have more chances of getting a confirmed ticket.

    – RedBaron
    yesterday





    +1 Another use case is trying to beat the quota system of Indian Railways. X-A-B ticket is under General Quota so more tickets are available but A-B ticket is under Pooled Quota so less tickets are available. It is sensible to buy X-B and set boarding point as A even though it is costlier because you have more chances of getting a confirmed ticket.

    – RedBaron
    yesterday




    2




    2





    @DmitryGrigoryev You will just loose the seat.

    – Anish Sheela
    yesterday





    @DmitryGrigoryev You will just loose the seat.

    – Anish Sheela
    yesterday




    9




    9





    This is completely insane. If I want to go from A to B, I would buy a ticket from A to B and not from X to B just because the damn railway company can't manage the seats properly!

    – ElmoVanKielmo
    yesterday





    This is completely insane. If I want to go from A to B, I would buy a ticket from A to B and not from X to B just because the damn railway company can't manage the seats properly!

    – ElmoVanKielmo
    yesterday













    8














    Recently I found this Boarding point feature very useful.



    I was booking ticket in Rajdhani from A to B but it was giving me error "BOOKING NOT ALLOWED FOR GIVEN PAIR OF STATIONS". The reason for this error is "If you're trying to book a ticket for a short journey on a train that travels a long distance, you might encounter this error message."



    So I booked ticket from X(Source station which is just two station before A) to B and changed my boarding to A.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Vivart is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.
















    • 5





      But a better solution would be to just let you book what you wanted! Presumably, they don't want people booking short journeys on long-distance trains because that would deny a seat to somebody who books later but wants to travel long-distance. But forcing you to take up a seat for more distance than you're using it makes that problem worse, not better!

      – David Richerby
      yesterday






    • 1





      This train is premium fast train with food on-board, Covering 2k km with 26 stoppage. So I think it will not be profitable or a good experience if they allow reservation between every station. If you really want ticket for A->B there are many other trains also.

      – Vivart
      yesterday













    • Sure, but there are better ways of discouraging reservations for short journeys on long-distance trains. They could just ban reservations for short journeys, for example. They could say "Tickets from A to B are not valid on the long-distance express."

      – David Richerby
      yesterday











    • yeah sure but in my case other trains timing were not matching with my schedule but this train timing was matching perfectly and as a plus point it's fastest in all other trains so I didn't mind to book for extra stations and changed boarding point.

      – Vivart
      yesterday
















    8














    Recently I found this Boarding point feature very useful.



    I was booking ticket in Rajdhani from A to B but it was giving me error "BOOKING NOT ALLOWED FOR GIVEN PAIR OF STATIONS". The reason for this error is "If you're trying to book a ticket for a short journey on a train that travels a long distance, you might encounter this error message."



    So I booked ticket from X(Source station which is just two station before A) to B and changed my boarding to A.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Vivart is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.
















    • 5





      But a better solution would be to just let you book what you wanted! Presumably, they don't want people booking short journeys on long-distance trains because that would deny a seat to somebody who books later but wants to travel long-distance. But forcing you to take up a seat for more distance than you're using it makes that problem worse, not better!

      – David Richerby
      yesterday






    • 1





      This train is premium fast train with food on-board, Covering 2k km with 26 stoppage. So I think it will not be profitable or a good experience if they allow reservation between every station. If you really want ticket for A->B there are many other trains also.

      – Vivart
      yesterday













    • Sure, but there are better ways of discouraging reservations for short journeys on long-distance trains. They could just ban reservations for short journeys, for example. They could say "Tickets from A to B are not valid on the long-distance express."

      – David Richerby
      yesterday











    • yeah sure but in my case other trains timing were not matching with my schedule but this train timing was matching perfectly and as a plus point it's fastest in all other trains so I didn't mind to book for extra stations and changed boarding point.

      – Vivart
      yesterday














    8












    8








    8







    Recently I found this Boarding point feature very useful.



    I was booking ticket in Rajdhani from A to B but it was giving me error "BOOKING NOT ALLOWED FOR GIVEN PAIR OF STATIONS". The reason for this error is "If you're trying to book a ticket for a short journey on a train that travels a long distance, you might encounter this error message."



    So I booked ticket from X(Source station which is just two station before A) to B and changed my boarding to A.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Vivart is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.










    Recently I found this Boarding point feature very useful.



    I was booking ticket in Rajdhani from A to B but it was giving me error "BOOKING NOT ALLOWED FOR GIVEN PAIR OF STATIONS". The reason for this error is "If you're trying to book a ticket for a short journey on a train that travels a long distance, you might encounter this error message."



    So I booked ticket from X(Source station which is just two station before A) to B and changed my boarding to A.







    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Vivart is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.









    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer






    New contributor




    Vivart is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.









    answered yesterday









    VivartVivart

    1813




    1813




    New contributor




    Vivart is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.





    New contributor





    Vivart is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    Vivart is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.








    • 5





      But a better solution would be to just let you book what you wanted! Presumably, they don't want people booking short journeys on long-distance trains because that would deny a seat to somebody who books later but wants to travel long-distance. But forcing you to take up a seat for more distance than you're using it makes that problem worse, not better!

      – David Richerby
      yesterday






    • 1





      This train is premium fast train with food on-board, Covering 2k km with 26 stoppage. So I think it will not be profitable or a good experience if they allow reservation between every station. If you really want ticket for A->B there are many other trains also.

      – Vivart
      yesterday













    • Sure, but there are better ways of discouraging reservations for short journeys on long-distance trains. They could just ban reservations for short journeys, for example. They could say "Tickets from A to B are not valid on the long-distance express."

      – David Richerby
      yesterday











    • yeah sure but in my case other trains timing were not matching with my schedule but this train timing was matching perfectly and as a plus point it's fastest in all other trains so I didn't mind to book for extra stations and changed boarding point.

      – Vivart
      yesterday














    • 5





      But a better solution would be to just let you book what you wanted! Presumably, they don't want people booking short journeys on long-distance trains because that would deny a seat to somebody who books later but wants to travel long-distance. But forcing you to take up a seat for more distance than you're using it makes that problem worse, not better!

      – David Richerby
      yesterday






    • 1





      This train is premium fast train with food on-board, Covering 2k km with 26 stoppage. So I think it will not be profitable or a good experience if they allow reservation between every station. If you really want ticket for A->B there are many other trains also.

      – Vivart
      yesterday













    • Sure, but there are better ways of discouraging reservations for short journeys on long-distance trains. They could just ban reservations for short journeys, for example. They could say "Tickets from A to B are not valid on the long-distance express."

      – David Richerby
      yesterday











    • yeah sure but in my case other trains timing were not matching with my schedule but this train timing was matching perfectly and as a plus point it's fastest in all other trains so I didn't mind to book for extra stations and changed boarding point.

      – Vivart
      yesterday








    5




    5





    But a better solution would be to just let you book what you wanted! Presumably, they don't want people booking short journeys on long-distance trains because that would deny a seat to somebody who books later but wants to travel long-distance. But forcing you to take up a seat for more distance than you're using it makes that problem worse, not better!

    – David Richerby
    yesterday





    But a better solution would be to just let you book what you wanted! Presumably, they don't want people booking short journeys on long-distance trains because that would deny a seat to somebody who books later but wants to travel long-distance. But forcing you to take up a seat for more distance than you're using it makes that problem worse, not better!

    – David Richerby
    yesterday




    1




    1





    This train is premium fast train with food on-board, Covering 2k km with 26 stoppage. So I think it will not be profitable or a good experience if they allow reservation between every station. If you really want ticket for A->B there are many other trains also.

    – Vivart
    yesterday







    This train is premium fast train with food on-board, Covering 2k km with 26 stoppage. So I think it will not be profitable or a good experience if they allow reservation between every station. If you really want ticket for A->B there are many other trains also.

    – Vivart
    yesterday















    Sure, but there are better ways of discouraging reservations for short journeys on long-distance trains. They could just ban reservations for short journeys, for example. They could say "Tickets from A to B are not valid on the long-distance express."

    – David Richerby
    yesterday





    Sure, but there are better ways of discouraging reservations for short journeys on long-distance trains. They could just ban reservations for short journeys, for example. They could say "Tickets from A to B are not valid on the long-distance express."

    – David Richerby
    yesterday













    yeah sure but in my case other trains timing were not matching with my schedule but this train timing was matching perfectly and as a plus point it's fastest in all other trains so I didn't mind to book for extra stations and changed boarding point.

    – Vivart
    yesterday





    yeah sure but in my case other trains timing were not matching with my schedule but this train timing was matching perfectly and as a plus point it's fastest in all other trains so I didn't mind to book for extra stations and changed boarding point.

    – Vivart
    yesterday











    4














    In Indian Railways there is a system called Reservation Against Cancellation or RAC. This is, let us say there are 700 seats in a train, then 750 people can book the ticket and board that particular train. A few seats (one per compartment) will be given to two people instead of one. So basically two people are alotted to the same seat. Now let us say someone did not board the train. Then the conductor will allocate that seat to one of the person who is under RAC.



    Now let us say, you booked a ticket from Mumbai, and decided to boared from Kota; the problem now is, when the conductor comes, you have not boarded from Mumbai and your seat will be allocated to the guy under RAC. To prevent this from happening you have to change your boarding point to Kota, so that the conductor knows that you didn't miss the train but will instead board from Kota, and your seat won't be allocated to someone else.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    illiteratewriter is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.
















    • 5





      This wouldn't have happen if you've just bought a ticket from Kota Jn to New Delhi, as jpatokal suggested.

      – Dmitry Grigoryev
      yesterday











    • @DmitryGrigoryev that happens when you want to change your boarding point only. By default if you book a ticket from Mumbai to Delhi, your boarding point will be Mumbai, and if you don't board from there, your ticket will be cancelled.

      – illiteratewriter
      yesterday








    • 3





      This is completely insane. If I want to go from A to B, I would buy a ticket from A to B and not from X to B just because the damn railway company can't manage the seats properly!

      – ElmoVanKielmo
      yesterday






    • 2





      First I thought - insane, but then I realized it is exactly what happens all over the world with plane tickets. In the train, at least you can stand in the corridor if there are no seats left...

      – Artur Biesiadowski
      yesterday






    • 1





      @ElmoVanKielmo, this is a combination of the "overbooking" and "standby travel" procedures that nearly every airline in the world uses. And from the viewpoint of the railroad, it makes perfect sense: if rail travel is anything like airline travel, about 15% of ticketed passengers won't show up, so selling more tickets than you have seats gives you a substantial increase in profit.

      – Mark
      yesterday
















    4














    In Indian Railways there is a system called Reservation Against Cancellation or RAC. This is, let us say there are 700 seats in a train, then 750 people can book the ticket and board that particular train. A few seats (one per compartment) will be given to two people instead of one. So basically two people are alotted to the same seat. Now let us say someone did not board the train. Then the conductor will allocate that seat to one of the person who is under RAC.



    Now let us say, you booked a ticket from Mumbai, and decided to boared from Kota; the problem now is, when the conductor comes, you have not boarded from Mumbai and your seat will be allocated to the guy under RAC. To prevent this from happening you have to change your boarding point to Kota, so that the conductor knows that you didn't miss the train but will instead board from Kota, and your seat won't be allocated to someone else.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    illiteratewriter is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.
















    • 5





      This wouldn't have happen if you've just bought a ticket from Kota Jn to New Delhi, as jpatokal suggested.

      – Dmitry Grigoryev
      yesterday











    • @DmitryGrigoryev that happens when you want to change your boarding point only. By default if you book a ticket from Mumbai to Delhi, your boarding point will be Mumbai, and if you don't board from there, your ticket will be cancelled.

      – illiteratewriter
      yesterday








    • 3





      This is completely insane. If I want to go from A to B, I would buy a ticket from A to B and not from X to B just because the damn railway company can't manage the seats properly!

      – ElmoVanKielmo
      yesterday






    • 2





      First I thought - insane, but then I realized it is exactly what happens all over the world with plane tickets. In the train, at least you can stand in the corridor if there are no seats left...

      – Artur Biesiadowski
      yesterday






    • 1





      @ElmoVanKielmo, this is a combination of the "overbooking" and "standby travel" procedures that nearly every airline in the world uses. And from the viewpoint of the railroad, it makes perfect sense: if rail travel is anything like airline travel, about 15% of ticketed passengers won't show up, so selling more tickets than you have seats gives you a substantial increase in profit.

      – Mark
      yesterday














    4












    4








    4







    In Indian Railways there is a system called Reservation Against Cancellation or RAC. This is, let us say there are 700 seats in a train, then 750 people can book the ticket and board that particular train. A few seats (one per compartment) will be given to two people instead of one. So basically two people are alotted to the same seat. Now let us say someone did not board the train. Then the conductor will allocate that seat to one of the person who is under RAC.



    Now let us say, you booked a ticket from Mumbai, and decided to boared from Kota; the problem now is, when the conductor comes, you have not boarded from Mumbai and your seat will be allocated to the guy under RAC. To prevent this from happening you have to change your boarding point to Kota, so that the conductor knows that you didn't miss the train but will instead board from Kota, and your seat won't be allocated to someone else.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    illiteratewriter is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.










    In Indian Railways there is a system called Reservation Against Cancellation or RAC. This is, let us say there are 700 seats in a train, then 750 people can book the ticket and board that particular train. A few seats (one per compartment) will be given to two people instead of one. So basically two people are alotted to the same seat. Now let us say someone did not board the train. Then the conductor will allocate that seat to one of the person who is under RAC.



    Now let us say, you booked a ticket from Mumbai, and decided to boared from Kota; the problem now is, when the conductor comes, you have not boarded from Mumbai and your seat will be allocated to the guy under RAC. To prevent this from happening you have to change your boarding point to Kota, so that the conductor knows that you didn't miss the train but will instead board from Kota, and your seat won't be allocated to someone else.







    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    illiteratewriter is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.









    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer






    New contributor




    illiteratewriter is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.









    answered yesterday









    illiteratewriterilliteratewriter

    1572




    1572




    New contributor




    illiteratewriter is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.





    New contributor





    illiteratewriter is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    illiteratewriter is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.








    • 5





      This wouldn't have happen if you've just bought a ticket from Kota Jn to New Delhi, as jpatokal suggested.

      – Dmitry Grigoryev
      yesterday











    • @DmitryGrigoryev that happens when you want to change your boarding point only. By default if you book a ticket from Mumbai to Delhi, your boarding point will be Mumbai, and if you don't board from there, your ticket will be cancelled.

      – illiteratewriter
      yesterday








    • 3





      This is completely insane. If I want to go from A to B, I would buy a ticket from A to B and not from X to B just because the damn railway company can't manage the seats properly!

      – ElmoVanKielmo
      yesterday






    • 2





      First I thought - insane, but then I realized it is exactly what happens all over the world with plane tickets. In the train, at least you can stand in the corridor if there are no seats left...

      – Artur Biesiadowski
      yesterday






    • 1





      @ElmoVanKielmo, this is a combination of the "overbooking" and "standby travel" procedures that nearly every airline in the world uses. And from the viewpoint of the railroad, it makes perfect sense: if rail travel is anything like airline travel, about 15% of ticketed passengers won't show up, so selling more tickets than you have seats gives you a substantial increase in profit.

      – Mark
      yesterday














    • 5





      This wouldn't have happen if you've just bought a ticket from Kota Jn to New Delhi, as jpatokal suggested.

      – Dmitry Grigoryev
      yesterday











    • @DmitryGrigoryev that happens when you want to change your boarding point only. By default if you book a ticket from Mumbai to Delhi, your boarding point will be Mumbai, and if you don't board from there, your ticket will be cancelled.

      – illiteratewriter
      yesterday








    • 3





      This is completely insane. If I want to go from A to B, I would buy a ticket from A to B and not from X to B just because the damn railway company can't manage the seats properly!

      – ElmoVanKielmo
      yesterday






    • 2





      First I thought - insane, but then I realized it is exactly what happens all over the world with plane tickets. In the train, at least you can stand in the corridor if there are no seats left...

      – Artur Biesiadowski
      yesterday






    • 1





      @ElmoVanKielmo, this is a combination of the "overbooking" and "standby travel" procedures that nearly every airline in the world uses. And from the viewpoint of the railroad, it makes perfect sense: if rail travel is anything like airline travel, about 15% of ticketed passengers won't show up, so selling more tickets than you have seats gives you a substantial increase in profit.

      – Mark
      yesterday








    5




    5





    This wouldn't have happen if you've just bought a ticket from Kota Jn to New Delhi, as jpatokal suggested.

    – Dmitry Grigoryev
    yesterday





    This wouldn't have happen if you've just bought a ticket from Kota Jn to New Delhi, as jpatokal suggested.

    – Dmitry Grigoryev
    yesterday













    @DmitryGrigoryev that happens when you want to change your boarding point only. By default if you book a ticket from Mumbai to Delhi, your boarding point will be Mumbai, and if you don't board from there, your ticket will be cancelled.

    – illiteratewriter
    yesterday







    @DmitryGrigoryev that happens when you want to change your boarding point only. By default if you book a ticket from Mumbai to Delhi, your boarding point will be Mumbai, and if you don't board from there, your ticket will be cancelled.

    – illiteratewriter
    yesterday






    3




    3





    This is completely insane. If I want to go from A to B, I would buy a ticket from A to B and not from X to B just because the damn railway company can't manage the seats properly!

    – ElmoVanKielmo
    yesterday





    This is completely insane. If I want to go from A to B, I would buy a ticket from A to B and not from X to B just because the damn railway company can't manage the seats properly!

    – ElmoVanKielmo
    yesterday




    2




    2





    First I thought - insane, but then I realized it is exactly what happens all over the world with plane tickets. In the train, at least you can stand in the corridor if there are no seats left...

    – Artur Biesiadowski
    yesterday





    First I thought - insane, but then I realized it is exactly what happens all over the world with plane tickets. In the train, at least you can stand in the corridor if there are no seats left...

    – Artur Biesiadowski
    yesterday




    1




    1





    @ElmoVanKielmo, this is a combination of the "overbooking" and "standby travel" procedures that nearly every airline in the world uses. And from the viewpoint of the railroad, it makes perfect sense: if rail travel is anything like airline travel, about 15% of ticketed passengers won't show up, so selling more tickets than you have seats gives you a substantial increase in profit.

    – Mark
    yesterday





    @ElmoVanKielmo, this is a combination of the "overbooking" and "standby travel" procedures that nearly every airline in the world uses. And from the viewpoint of the railroad, it makes perfect sense: if rail travel is anything like airline travel, about 15% of ticketed passengers won't show up, so selling more tickets than you have seats gives you a substantial increase in profit.

    – Mark
    yesterday











    4














    Indian trains cover very large distances over multiple days and have various stoppages along the way. The reservations are usually done at least 2-3 months in advance and for this reason, having a little bit of flexibility in case of change of plans is very useful and convenient for the people.



    Instead of canceling the entire ticket and trying to re-book it from a new station along the way, it becomes handy to just change the boarding point while still having a confirmed ticket in hand.



    It might surprise some but the volume of people that travel in Indian trains every day is so huge that some people do not get confirmed seats even if they book well in advance. The ticketing system is very advanced and is designed based on the traffic which means that if X-B is a more popular travel route, more percent of seats will be allotted for this route on a particular train than A-B. It is referred to as quota but it is just based on traffic. Any tickets being booked from X-B will have more probability of a confirmed reservation than A-B.



    For this reason, people sometimes knowingly book tickets from a different station even if it costs more. Also, the entire reservation system is transparent so at the time of booking, you can very well see if there are seats left on A-B route or not and then book from X-B in case the seats are taken. You can still get a wait-list ticket for A-B but that will be a risk because then your confirmation will depend on somebody else canceling their A-B tickets for more seats to open up.






    share|improve this answer






























      4














      Indian trains cover very large distances over multiple days and have various stoppages along the way. The reservations are usually done at least 2-3 months in advance and for this reason, having a little bit of flexibility in case of change of plans is very useful and convenient for the people.



      Instead of canceling the entire ticket and trying to re-book it from a new station along the way, it becomes handy to just change the boarding point while still having a confirmed ticket in hand.



      It might surprise some but the volume of people that travel in Indian trains every day is so huge that some people do not get confirmed seats even if they book well in advance. The ticketing system is very advanced and is designed based on the traffic which means that if X-B is a more popular travel route, more percent of seats will be allotted for this route on a particular train than A-B. It is referred to as quota but it is just based on traffic. Any tickets being booked from X-B will have more probability of a confirmed reservation than A-B.



      For this reason, people sometimes knowingly book tickets from a different station even if it costs more. Also, the entire reservation system is transparent so at the time of booking, you can very well see if there are seats left on A-B route or not and then book from X-B in case the seats are taken. You can still get a wait-list ticket for A-B but that will be a risk because then your confirmation will depend on somebody else canceling their A-B tickets for more seats to open up.






      share|improve this answer




























        4












        4








        4







        Indian trains cover very large distances over multiple days and have various stoppages along the way. The reservations are usually done at least 2-3 months in advance and for this reason, having a little bit of flexibility in case of change of plans is very useful and convenient for the people.



        Instead of canceling the entire ticket and trying to re-book it from a new station along the way, it becomes handy to just change the boarding point while still having a confirmed ticket in hand.



        It might surprise some but the volume of people that travel in Indian trains every day is so huge that some people do not get confirmed seats even if they book well in advance. The ticketing system is very advanced and is designed based on the traffic which means that if X-B is a more popular travel route, more percent of seats will be allotted for this route on a particular train than A-B. It is referred to as quota but it is just based on traffic. Any tickets being booked from X-B will have more probability of a confirmed reservation than A-B.



        For this reason, people sometimes knowingly book tickets from a different station even if it costs more. Also, the entire reservation system is transparent so at the time of booking, you can very well see if there are seats left on A-B route or not and then book from X-B in case the seats are taken. You can still get a wait-list ticket for A-B but that will be a risk because then your confirmation will depend on somebody else canceling their A-B tickets for more seats to open up.






        share|improve this answer















        Indian trains cover very large distances over multiple days and have various stoppages along the way. The reservations are usually done at least 2-3 months in advance and for this reason, having a little bit of flexibility in case of change of plans is very useful and convenient for the people.



        Instead of canceling the entire ticket and trying to re-book it from a new station along the way, it becomes handy to just change the boarding point while still having a confirmed ticket in hand.



        It might surprise some but the volume of people that travel in Indian trains every day is so huge that some people do not get confirmed seats even if they book well in advance. The ticketing system is very advanced and is designed based on the traffic which means that if X-B is a more popular travel route, more percent of seats will be allotted for this route on a particular train than A-B. It is referred to as quota but it is just based on traffic. Any tickets being booked from X-B will have more probability of a confirmed reservation than A-B.



        For this reason, people sometimes knowingly book tickets from a different station even if it costs more. Also, the entire reservation system is transparent so at the time of booking, you can very well see if there are seats left on A-B route or not and then book from X-B in case the seats are taken. You can still get a wait-list ticket for A-B but that will be a risk because then your confirmation will depend on somebody else canceling their A-B tickets for more seats to open up.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited yesterday

























        answered yesterday









        NeelsNeels

        988915




        988915























            3














            Consider a train with 150 seats. Consider the route has 3 stations A-X-B. A is the starting point and the larger and popular station, so it is assigned more seats for reservation. Consider it to be



            A: 125 seats

            X: 25 seats



            Logically, there are more chances of getting a confirmed ticket for the route A-B than X-B.



            Indian Railways sells a lot more tickets than the number of seats on the train, so the ticket you buy can be in Confirmed,RAC or Waiting status.





            • Confirmed - You have a seat number and a bed assigned


            • RAC - Your ticket would be in RAC if all the seats have been sold off. This mean you can get into the train and sit in some
              seat assigned by the TC, but you would only get a bed if someone
              with a confirmed seat cancels their ticket or fails to turn up
              in the train at their boarding point              .


            • Waiting List - This means all the Confirmed and RAC tickets have been completed and you are on a wait-list. You are not allowed to board the train with a ticket in this status. Your status might change
              daily until the day of departure depending on the number of
              Confimred/RAC passengers cancelling their tickets.


            So, I can buy a ticket for A-B and put the boarding point as X, in the following scenarios:




            1. I want to have a better probability of getting a Confirmed ticket
              rather than a RAC/Wait-listed ticket and I don't mind the extra
              charge I pay for my lesser distance.
              If I just buy a ticket from A-B without specifying any boarding point
              and try to board at X, I would be marked as a no-show and my seat
              would've already be given to some RAC passenger.
              So the proper
              procedure of booking would be to buy a ticket for A-B with boarding
              point as X. This makes sure I have my seat and bed free when I board in station X.


            2. I had originally intended to travel from A-B, but later changed my
              plans and want to board the train at X. If I cancel the whole ticket
              and try to buy a new ticket for X-B, I might get a Wait-listed
              ticket. Hence, I keep my existing Confirmed ticket and just change
              the Boarding point to X.







            share|improve this answer










            New contributor




            CoralReef is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.





















            • Not shooting the messenger, of course, but if people who live in X have a higher chance of getting a seat from A's quota than their own, that says that the quotas are set at the wrong level! This isn't helping people from X: it's screwing them over by making them buy tickets from A. Indeed, why have quotas at all? If there are 150 seats on the train and five times as many people want to travel from A as from X then, with no quota system at all (just reserved seats and standbys), you will naturally end up with about 125 people from A and 25 people from X on each train.

              – David Richerby
              5 hours ago











            • @DavidRicherby This is my interpretation, so a pinch of salt disclaimer. The purpose of a quota is to guarantee some seats for X (which is usually a smaller intermediate town along the way). If there is a waiting list for both the quotas, it is your call whether to add yourself to the list for the smaller or the bigger quota. I presume that at the time of charting (couple of hours before the journey when these things are settled), they will automatically clear waiting lists across quotas if one is full and the other is not. Presumably this also allows them to optimize on seat occupancy.

              – Ankush Jain
              4 hours ago











            • Another example, if on a long distance train (A-X-Y-B) a particular intermediate section (X-Y) is very popular, those travellers are competing against longer distance travellers (A-B). The cap for X-Y can be set to roughly match the demand of A-X and Y-B, so that all cities have some shot at a reservation, and coach occupancy is not affected. If you want to travel on X-Y but are willing to pay for A-B, well that's a special case. With hundreds of trains having 50-odd stops, these things do add up.

              – Ankush Jain
              4 hours ago


















            3














            Consider a train with 150 seats. Consider the route has 3 stations A-X-B. A is the starting point and the larger and popular station, so it is assigned more seats for reservation. Consider it to be



            A: 125 seats

            X: 25 seats



            Logically, there are more chances of getting a confirmed ticket for the route A-B than X-B.



            Indian Railways sells a lot more tickets than the number of seats on the train, so the ticket you buy can be in Confirmed,RAC or Waiting status.





            • Confirmed - You have a seat number and a bed assigned


            • RAC - Your ticket would be in RAC if all the seats have been sold off. This mean you can get into the train and sit in some
              seat assigned by the TC, but you would only get a bed if someone
              with a confirmed seat cancels their ticket or fails to turn up
              in the train at their boarding point              .


            • Waiting List - This means all the Confirmed and RAC tickets have been completed and you are on a wait-list. You are not allowed to board the train with a ticket in this status. Your status might change
              daily until the day of departure depending on the number of
              Confimred/RAC passengers cancelling their tickets.


            So, I can buy a ticket for A-B and put the boarding point as X, in the following scenarios:




            1. I want to have a better probability of getting a Confirmed ticket
              rather than a RAC/Wait-listed ticket and I don't mind the extra
              charge I pay for my lesser distance.
              If I just buy a ticket from A-B without specifying any boarding point
              and try to board at X, I would be marked as a no-show and my seat
              would've already be given to some RAC passenger.
              So the proper
              procedure of booking would be to buy a ticket for A-B with boarding
              point as X. This makes sure I have my seat and bed free when I board in station X.


            2. I had originally intended to travel from A-B, but later changed my
              plans and want to board the train at X. If I cancel the whole ticket
              and try to buy a new ticket for X-B, I might get a Wait-listed
              ticket. Hence, I keep my existing Confirmed ticket and just change
              the Boarding point to X.







            share|improve this answer










            New contributor




            CoralReef is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.





















            • Not shooting the messenger, of course, but if people who live in X have a higher chance of getting a seat from A's quota than their own, that says that the quotas are set at the wrong level! This isn't helping people from X: it's screwing them over by making them buy tickets from A. Indeed, why have quotas at all? If there are 150 seats on the train and five times as many people want to travel from A as from X then, with no quota system at all (just reserved seats and standbys), you will naturally end up with about 125 people from A and 25 people from X on each train.

              – David Richerby
              5 hours ago











            • @DavidRicherby This is my interpretation, so a pinch of salt disclaimer. The purpose of a quota is to guarantee some seats for X (which is usually a smaller intermediate town along the way). If there is a waiting list for both the quotas, it is your call whether to add yourself to the list for the smaller or the bigger quota. I presume that at the time of charting (couple of hours before the journey when these things are settled), they will automatically clear waiting lists across quotas if one is full and the other is not. Presumably this also allows them to optimize on seat occupancy.

              – Ankush Jain
              4 hours ago











            • Another example, if on a long distance train (A-X-Y-B) a particular intermediate section (X-Y) is very popular, those travellers are competing against longer distance travellers (A-B). The cap for X-Y can be set to roughly match the demand of A-X and Y-B, so that all cities have some shot at a reservation, and coach occupancy is not affected. If you want to travel on X-Y but are willing to pay for A-B, well that's a special case. With hundreds of trains having 50-odd stops, these things do add up.

              – Ankush Jain
              4 hours ago
















            3












            3








            3







            Consider a train with 150 seats. Consider the route has 3 stations A-X-B. A is the starting point and the larger and popular station, so it is assigned more seats for reservation. Consider it to be



            A: 125 seats

            X: 25 seats



            Logically, there are more chances of getting a confirmed ticket for the route A-B than X-B.



            Indian Railways sells a lot more tickets than the number of seats on the train, so the ticket you buy can be in Confirmed,RAC or Waiting status.





            • Confirmed - You have a seat number and a bed assigned


            • RAC - Your ticket would be in RAC if all the seats have been sold off. This mean you can get into the train and sit in some
              seat assigned by the TC, but you would only get a bed if someone
              with a confirmed seat cancels their ticket or fails to turn up
              in the train at their boarding point              .


            • Waiting List - This means all the Confirmed and RAC tickets have been completed and you are on a wait-list. You are not allowed to board the train with a ticket in this status. Your status might change
              daily until the day of departure depending on the number of
              Confimred/RAC passengers cancelling their tickets.


            So, I can buy a ticket for A-B and put the boarding point as X, in the following scenarios:




            1. I want to have a better probability of getting a Confirmed ticket
              rather than a RAC/Wait-listed ticket and I don't mind the extra
              charge I pay for my lesser distance.
              If I just buy a ticket from A-B without specifying any boarding point
              and try to board at X, I would be marked as a no-show and my seat
              would've already be given to some RAC passenger.
              So the proper
              procedure of booking would be to buy a ticket for A-B with boarding
              point as X. This makes sure I have my seat and bed free when I board in station X.


            2. I had originally intended to travel from A-B, but later changed my
              plans and want to board the train at X. If I cancel the whole ticket
              and try to buy a new ticket for X-B, I might get a Wait-listed
              ticket. Hence, I keep my existing Confirmed ticket and just change
              the Boarding point to X.







            share|improve this answer










            New contributor




            CoralReef is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.










            Consider a train with 150 seats. Consider the route has 3 stations A-X-B. A is the starting point and the larger and popular station, so it is assigned more seats for reservation. Consider it to be



            A: 125 seats

            X: 25 seats



            Logically, there are more chances of getting a confirmed ticket for the route A-B than X-B.



            Indian Railways sells a lot more tickets than the number of seats on the train, so the ticket you buy can be in Confirmed,RAC or Waiting status.





            • Confirmed - You have a seat number and a bed assigned


            • RAC - Your ticket would be in RAC if all the seats have been sold off. This mean you can get into the train and sit in some
              seat assigned by the TC, but you would only get a bed if someone
              with a confirmed seat cancels their ticket or fails to turn up
              in the train at their boarding point              .


            • Waiting List - This means all the Confirmed and RAC tickets have been completed and you are on a wait-list. You are not allowed to board the train with a ticket in this status. Your status might change
              daily until the day of departure depending on the number of
              Confimred/RAC passengers cancelling their tickets.


            So, I can buy a ticket for A-B and put the boarding point as X, in the following scenarios:




            1. I want to have a better probability of getting a Confirmed ticket
              rather than a RAC/Wait-listed ticket and I don't mind the extra
              charge I pay for my lesser distance.
              If I just buy a ticket from A-B without specifying any boarding point
              and try to board at X, I would be marked as a no-show and my seat
              would've already be given to some RAC passenger.
              So the proper
              procedure of booking would be to buy a ticket for A-B with boarding
              point as X. This makes sure I have my seat and bed free when I board in station X.


            2. I had originally intended to travel from A-B, but later changed my
              plans and want to board the train at X. If I cancel the whole ticket
              and try to buy a new ticket for X-B, I might get a Wait-listed
              ticket. Hence, I keep my existing Confirmed ticket and just change
              the Boarding point to X.








            share|improve this answer










            New contributor




            CoralReef is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.









            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 5 hours ago





















            New contributor




            CoralReef is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.









            answered 6 hours ago









            CoralReefCoralReef

            312




            312




            New contributor




            CoralReef is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.





            New contributor





            CoralReef is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.






            CoralReef is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.













            • Not shooting the messenger, of course, but if people who live in X have a higher chance of getting a seat from A's quota than their own, that says that the quotas are set at the wrong level! This isn't helping people from X: it's screwing them over by making them buy tickets from A. Indeed, why have quotas at all? If there are 150 seats on the train and five times as many people want to travel from A as from X then, with no quota system at all (just reserved seats and standbys), you will naturally end up with about 125 people from A and 25 people from X on each train.

              – David Richerby
              5 hours ago











            • @DavidRicherby This is my interpretation, so a pinch of salt disclaimer. The purpose of a quota is to guarantee some seats for X (which is usually a smaller intermediate town along the way). If there is a waiting list for both the quotas, it is your call whether to add yourself to the list for the smaller or the bigger quota. I presume that at the time of charting (couple of hours before the journey when these things are settled), they will automatically clear waiting lists across quotas if one is full and the other is not. Presumably this also allows them to optimize on seat occupancy.

              – Ankush Jain
              4 hours ago











            • Another example, if on a long distance train (A-X-Y-B) a particular intermediate section (X-Y) is very popular, those travellers are competing against longer distance travellers (A-B). The cap for X-Y can be set to roughly match the demand of A-X and Y-B, so that all cities have some shot at a reservation, and coach occupancy is not affected. If you want to travel on X-Y but are willing to pay for A-B, well that's a special case. With hundreds of trains having 50-odd stops, these things do add up.

              – Ankush Jain
              4 hours ago





















            • Not shooting the messenger, of course, but if people who live in X have a higher chance of getting a seat from A's quota than their own, that says that the quotas are set at the wrong level! This isn't helping people from X: it's screwing them over by making them buy tickets from A. Indeed, why have quotas at all? If there are 150 seats on the train and five times as many people want to travel from A as from X then, with no quota system at all (just reserved seats and standbys), you will naturally end up with about 125 people from A and 25 people from X on each train.

              – David Richerby
              5 hours ago











            • @DavidRicherby This is my interpretation, so a pinch of salt disclaimer. The purpose of a quota is to guarantee some seats for X (which is usually a smaller intermediate town along the way). If there is a waiting list for both the quotas, it is your call whether to add yourself to the list for the smaller or the bigger quota. I presume that at the time of charting (couple of hours before the journey when these things are settled), they will automatically clear waiting lists across quotas if one is full and the other is not. Presumably this also allows them to optimize on seat occupancy.

              – Ankush Jain
              4 hours ago











            • Another example, if on a long distance train (A-X-Y-B) a particular intermediate section (X-Y) is very popular, those travellers are competing against longer distance travellers (A-B). The cap for X-Y can be set to roughly match the demand of A-X and Y-B, so that all cities have some shot at a reservation, and coach occupancy is not affected. If you want to travel on X-Y but are willing to pay for A-B, well that's a special case. With hundreds of trains having 50-odd stops, these things do add up.

              – Ankush Jain
              4 hours ago



















            Not shooting the messenger, of course, but if people who live in X have a higher chance of getting a seat from A's quota than their own, that says that the quotas are set at the wrong level! This isn't helping people from X: it's screwing them over by making them buy tickets from A. Indeed, why have quotas at all? If there are 150 seats on the train and five times as many people want to travel from A as from X then, with no quota system at all (just reserved seats and standbys), you will naturally end up with about 125 people from A and 25 people from X on each train.

            – David Richerby
            5 hours ago





            Not shooting the messenger, of course, but if people who live in X have a higher chance of getting a seat from A's quota than their own, that says that the quotas are set at the wrong level! This isn't helping people from X: it's screwing them over by making them buy tickets from A. Indeed, why have quotas at all? If there are 150 seats on the train and five times as many people want to travel from A as from X then, with no quota system at all (just reserved seats and standbys), you will naturally end up with about 125 people from A and 25 people from X on each train.

            – David Richerby
            5 hours ago













            @DavidRicherby This is my interpretation, so a pinch of salt disclaimer. The purpose of a quota is to guarantee some seats for X (which is usually a smaller intermediate town along the way). If there is a waiting list for both the quotas, it is your call whether to add yourself to the list for the smaller or the bigger quota. I presume that at the time of charting (couple of hours before the journey when these things are settled), they will automatically clear waiting lists across quotas if one is full and the other is not. Presumably this also allows them to optimize on seat occupancy.

            – Ankush Jain
            4 hours ago





            @DavidRicherby This is my interpretation, so a pinch of salt disclaimer. The purpose of a quota is to guarantee some seats for X (which is usually a smaller intermediate town along the way). If there is a waiting list for both the quotas, it is your call whether to add yourself to the list for the smaller or the bigger quota. I presume that at the time of charting (couple of hours before the journey when these things are settled), they will automatically clear waiting lists across quotas if one is full and the other is not. Presumably this also allows them to optimize on seat occupancy.

            – Ankush Jain
            4 hours ago













            Another example, if on a long distance train (A-X-Y-B) a particular intermediate section (X-Y) is very popular, those travellers are competing against longer distance travellers (A-B). The cap for X-Y can be set to roughly match the demand of A-X and Y-B, so that all cities have some shot at a reservation, and coach occupancy is not affected. If you want to travel on X-Y but are willing to pay for A-B, well that's a special case. With hundreds of trains having 50-odd stops, these things do add up.

            – Ankush Jain
            4 hours ago







            Another example, if on a long distance train (A-X-Y-B) a particular intermediate section (X-Y) is very popular, those travellers are competing against longer distance travellers (A-B). The cap for X-Y can be set to roughly match the demand of A-X and Y-B, so that all cities have some shot at a reservation, and coach occupancy is not affected. If you want to travel on X-Y but are willing to pay for A-B, well that's a special case. With hundreds of trains having 50-odd stops, these things do add up.

            – Ankush Jain
            4 hours ago




















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Travel Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftravel.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f129950%2fwhat-is-the-purpose-of-boarding-points-on-indian-railways-tickets%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            Terni

            Image
            Questa voce o sezione sull'argomento Umbria non è ancora formattata secondo gli standard . Contribuisci a migliorarla secondo le convenzioni di Wikipedia. Segui i suggerimenti del progetto di riferimento. Terni comune Localizzazione Stato   Italia Regione Umbria Provincia Terni Amministrazione Sindaco Leonardo Latini (Lega Nord) dal 25-06-2018 Territorio Coordinate 42°34′N 12°39′E  /  42.566667°N 12.65°E 42.566667; 12.65  ( Terni ) Coordinate: 42°34′N 12°39′E  /  42.566667°N 12.65°E 42.566667; 12.65  ( Terni ) Altitudine 130 m s.l.m. Superficie 211,90 km² Abitanti 111 189 [1] (31-12-2017) Densità 524,72 ab./km² Frazioni Vedi elenco Comuni confinanti Acquasparta, Arrone, Colli sul Velino (RI), Labro (RI), Montecastrilli, Montefranco, Narni, Rieti (RI), San Gemini, Spoleto (PG), Stroncone Altre informazioni Cod. postale 05100 Prefisso 0744 Fuso orario UTC+1 Codice ISTAT...
            Read more

            A new problem with tex4ht and tikz

            Image
            3 When run through pdflatex the code snippet below produces: but when I run it through make4ht the following web page, without the numbers, is generated: (The difference in scale is an artifact of my skills in taking screenshots.) Here is the code: documentclass{article} usepackage{tikz} begin{document} begin{tikzpicture} foreach x in {-3,...,3} { draw(x,0.25) --(x,0)node[below]{x}; } foreach x in {-2.5,...,2.5} { draw(x,0.18) --(x,0); } draw[thick,<->](-3.5,0)--(3.5,0); filldraw[blue!50!white](1.5,0) circle (1mm); draw[red] (-3.5,-1) rectangle (3.5,1); % make bounding box higher end{tikzpicture} end{document} Only the first line of the tikzpicture environment is necessary. The rest is just to show that everything else is OK. I am...
            Read more

            Sun Ra

            Image
            .mw-parser-output .avviso .mbox-text-div>div,.mw-parser-output .avviso .mbox-text-full-div>div{font-size:90%}.mw-parser-output .avviso .mbox-image div{width:52px}.mw-parser-output .avviso .mbox-text-full-div .hide-when-compact{display:block} Questa voce o sezione sull'argomento compositori statunitensi non cita le fonti necessarie o quelle presenti sono insufficienti . Puoi migliorare questa voce aggiungendo citazioni da fonti attendibili secondo le linee guida sull'uso delle fonti. Sun Ra Sun Ra nel 1992 al conservatorio del New England Nazionalità   Stati Uniti Genere Fusion Free jazz Hard bop Space music Jazz d'avanguardia Musica sperimentale Big band Periodo di attività musicale 1934 – 1993 Strumento pianoforte, sintetizzatore Modifica dati su Wikidata  · Manuale .mw-parser-output .citazione-table{margin-bottom:.5em;font-size:95%}.mw-parser-output .citazione-table td{padding:0 1.2em 0 2.4em}.mw-parser-output...
            Read more