Is there any way to make the execution faster in the below Java code?
$begingroup$
My Java code is as below.
boolean almostIncreasingSequence(int sequence) {
Integer arr = new Integer[sequence.length];
for(int ctr = 0; ctr < sequence.length; ctr++) {
arr[ctr] = Integer.valueOf(sequence[ctr]); // returns Integer value
}
System.out.println("Integer :: " + arr);
List<Integer> al = new ArrayList<Integer>();
// adding elements of array to arrayList.
Collections.addAll(al, arr);
System.out.println("list :: " + al);
int save, flag = 0;
for(int i=0; i<al.size(); i++) {
save = al.get(i);
al.remove(i);
if(al.size()==1) return true;
for(int j=0; j<al.size()-1; j++) {
if(al.get(j+1) > al.get(j)) {
flag = 0;
continue;
}
else {
flag = 1;
break;
}
}
if(flag == 0) {
return true;
}
al.add(i,save);
}
if(flag == 1)
return false;
return true;
}
The code is for a Problem "Given a sequence of integers as an array, determine whether it is possible to obtain a strictly increasing sequence by removing no more than one element from the array."
For some of the test cases, it shows that it takes more than 3 seconds to execute this. But, I'm not sure where can I make a change to execute it faster. I don't have access to the test case.
Here, I have created 2 for loops because in the first loop I'm generating the list where each index will be removed and in the second loop I'm iterating over the new list which has removed the element.
like sample array is {1,2,4,3} then in the first loop I'm creating an array which will be {2,4,3},{1,4,3},{1,2,3} and {1,2,4}. In the second loop I'm iterating over all these 4 arrays to compare each element.
java performance
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
My Java code is as below.
boolean almostIncreasingSequence(int sequence) {
Integer arr = new Integer[sequence.length];
for(int ctr = 0; ctr < sequence.length; ctr++) {
arr[ctr] = Integer.valueOf(sequence[ctr]); // returns Integer value
}
System.out.println("Integer :: " + arr);
List<Integer> al = new ArrayList<Integer>();
// adding elements of array to arrayList.
Collections.addAll(al, arr);
System.out.println("list :: " + al);
int save, flag = 0;
for(int i=0; i<al.size(); i++) {
save = al.get(i);
al.remove(i);
if(al.size()==1) return true;
for(int j=0; j<al.size()-1; j++) {
if(al.get(j+1) > al.get(j)) {
flag = 0;
continue;
}
else {
flag = 1;
break;
}
}
if(flag == 0) {
return true;
}
al.add(i,save);
}
if(flag == 1)
return false;
return true;
}
The code is for a Problem "Given a sequence of integers as an array, determine whether it is possible to obtain a strictly increasing sequence by removing no more than one element from the array."
For some of the test cases, it shows that it takes more than 3 seconds to execute this. But, I'm not sure where can I make a change to execute it faster. I don't have access to the test case.
Here, I have created 2 for loops because in the first loop I'm generating the list where each index will be removed and in the second loop I'm iterating over the new list which has removed the element.
like sample array is {1,2,4,3} then in the first loop I'm creating an array which will be {2,4,3},{1,4,3},{1,2,3} and {1,2,4}. In the second loop I'm iterating over all these 4 arrays to compare each element.
java performance
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
My Java code is as below.
boolean almostIncreasingSequence(int sequence) {
Integer arr = new Integer[sequence.length];
for(int ctr = 0; ctr < sequence.length; ctr++) {
arr[ctr] = Integer.valueOf(sequence[ctr]); // returns Integer value
}
System.out.println("Integer :: " + arr);
List<Integer> al = new ArrayList<Integer>();
// adding elements of array to arrayList.
Collections.addAll(al, arr);
System.out.println("list :: " + al);
int save, flag = 0;
for(int i=0; i<al.size(); i++) {
save = al.get(i);
al.remove(i);
if(al.size()==1) return true;
for(int j=0; j<al.size()-1; j++) {
if(al.get(j+1) > al.get(j)) {
flag = 0;
continue;
}
else {
flag = 1;
break;
}
}
if(flag == 0) {
return true;
}
al.add(i,save);
}
if(flag == 1)
return false;
return true;
}
The code is for a Problem "Given a sequence of integers as an array, determine whether it is possible to obtain a strictly increasing sequence by removing no more than one element from the array."
For some of the test cases, it shows that it takes more than 3 seconds to execute this. But, I'm not sure where can I make a change to execute it faster. I don't have access to the test case.
Here, I have created 2 for loops because in the first loop I'm generating the list where each index will be removed and in the second loop I'm iterating over the new list which has removed the element.
like sample array is {1,2,4,3} then in the first loop I'm creating an array which will be {2,4,3},{1,4,3},{1,2,3} and {1,2,4}. In the second loop I'm iterating over all these 4 arrays to compare each element.
java performance
New contributor
$endgroup$
My Java code is as below.
boolean almostIncreasingSequence(int sequence) {
Integer arr = new Integer[sequence.length];
for(int ctr = 0; ctr < sequence.length; ctr++) {
arr[ctr] = Integer.valueOf(sequence[ctr]); // returns Integer value
}
System.out.println("Integer :: " + arr);
List<Integer> al = new ArrayList<Integer>();
// adding elements of array to arrayList.
Collections.addAll(al, arr);
System.out.println("list :: " + al);
int save, flag = 0;
for(int i=0; i<al.size(); i++) {
save = al.get(i);
al.remove(i);
if(al.size()==1) return true;
for(int j=0; j<al.size()-1; j++) {
if(al.get(j+1) > al.get(j)) {
flag = 0;
continue;
}
else {
flag = 1;
break;
}
}
if(flag == 0) {
return true;
}
al.add(i,save);
}
if(flag == 1)
return false;
return true;
}
The code is for a Problem "Given a sequence of integers as an array, determine whether it is possible to obtain a strictly increasing sequence by removing no more than one element from the array."
For some of the test cases, it shows that it takes more than 3 seconds to execute this. But, I'm not sure where can I make a change to execute it faster. I don't have access to the test case.
Here, I have created 2 for loops because in the first loop I'm generating the list where each index will be removed and in the second loop I'm iterating over the new list which has removed the element.
like sample array is {1,2,4,3} then in the first loop I'm creating an array which will be {2,4,3},{1,4,3},{1,2,3} and {1,2,4}. In the second loop I'm iterating over all these 4 arrays to compare each element.
java performance
java performance
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 4 mins ago
VirusVirus
1
1
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "196"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Virus is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f212046%2fis-there-any-way-to-make-the-execution-faster-in-the-below-java-code%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Virus is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Virus is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Virus is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Virus is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f212046%2fis-there-any-way-to-make-the-execution-faster-in-the-below-java-code%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown