Does a neutral dimercury molecule exist?
$begingroup$
Is a neutral $ce{Hg2}$ molecule possible, as a gas under extremely low (partial) pressures? What is the enthalpy of formation or similar?
It is my impression that usual mercury vapors are monatomic? I think it is well-known that a dimer ion $ce{Hg2^{2+}}$ exists under some conditions.
Somewhat related threads: Is it possible to have a diatomic molecule of sodium in gaseous state? and Which elements can be diatomic?
bond molecular-orbital-theory allotropes
New contributor
Jeppe Stig Nielsen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is a neutral $ce{Hg2}$ molecule possible, as a gas under extremely low (partial) pressures? What is the enthalpy of formation or similar?
It is my impression that usual mercury vapors are monatomic? I think it is well-known that a dimer ion $ce{Hg2^{2+}}$ exists under some conditions.
Somewhat related threads: Is it possible to have a diatomic molecule of sodium in gaseous state? and Which elements can be diatomic?
bond molecular-orbital-theory allotropes
New contributor
Jeppe Stig Nielsen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is a neutral $ce{Hg2}$ molecule possible, as a gas under extremely low (partial) pressures? What is the enthalpy of formation or similar?
It is my impression that usual mercury vapors are monatomic? I think it is well-known that a dimer ion $ce{Hg2^{2+}}$ exists under some conditions.
Somewhat related threads: Is it possible to have a diatomic molecule of sodium in gaseous state? and Which elements can be diatomic?
bond molecular-orbital-theory allotropes
New contributor
Jeppe Stig Nielsen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
Is a neutral $ce{Hg2}$ molecule possible, as a gas under extremely low (partial) pressures? What is the enthalpy of formation or similar?
It is my impression that usual mercury vapors are monatomic? I think it is well-known that a dimer ion $ce{Hg2^{2+}}$ exists under some conditions.
Somewhat related threads: Is it possible to have a diatomic molecule of sodium in gaseous state? and Which elements can be diatomic?
bond molecular-orbital-theory allotropes
bond molecular-orbital-theory allotropes
New contributor
Jeppe Stig Nielsen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Jeppe Stig Nielsen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Jeppe Stig Nielsen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 6 hours ago
Jeppe Stig NielsenJeppe Stig Nielsen
1513
1513
New contributor
Jeppe Stig Nielsen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Jeppe Stig Nielsen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Jeppe Stig Nielsen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
There has been recent research on mercury dimers in its ground state. Bond energies, transition energies, band spectrum and other parameters has been calculated spectroscopically. Here are the abstracts of two papers on mercury dimer:
The potential energy curve of the ground electronic state of the Hg dimer has been calculated using the CCSD(T) procedure and relativistic effective core potentials. The calculated binding energy (0.047 eV) and equilibrium separation (3.72 Å) are in excellent agreement with experiment. A variety of properties, including the second virial coefficient, rotational and vibrational spectroscopic constants, and vibrational energy levels, have been calculated using this interatomic potential and agreement with experiment is good overall.(Source)
The mercury dimer is among the most weakly bound metal dimers and has been extensively studied. The ground state $ce{O^+_g}$ dissociation energy has been considered to lie between 0.55 eV (440 cm−1) and 0.091 eV (730 cm−1). We report here a spectroscopic study of $ce{Hg2}$ in a supersonic jet. The first optical transition, $ce{1_u←O^+_g}$, was characterized by its fluorescence excitation spectrum and the binding energy of the ground state has been measured precisely through the threshold of collision induced dissociation of $ce{Hg2 1_u}$ to $ce{Hg(^1S_0)+Hg(^3P_0)}$.(Source)
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
What does "has been calculated spectroscopically" mean? Do you mean "... and other spectroscopic parameters have been calculated"?
$endgroup$
– orthocresol♦
5 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, $ce{Hg2}$ has a bond length of $pu{0.334nm}$ and a dissociation energy of $pu{7.5 kJ/mol}$.
See Mercury Handbook: Chemistry, Applications and Environmental Impact at page 10.
and
Mass spectrometric equilibrium study of the molecule $ce{Hg2}$ J. Chem. Phys. 1982, 77(3), 1425-1427 (https://doi.org/10.1063/1.443968).
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Respectfully, this isn't a molecule.
$endgroup$
– permeakra
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
@permeakra is the potential well enough to have at least one vibrational state?
$endgroup$
– DavePhD
6 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
Doesn't matter. Water dimer is not considered a molecule, even though the bonding it fairly strong.
$endgroup$
– permeakra
6 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@permeakra it matters to IUPAC goldbook.iupac.org/html/M/M04002.html
$endgroup$
– DavePhD
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The nature of mercury associates was studied. Quick googling gave paper with words "$ce{Hg_x}$ cluster transition from VdW to metallic bahavior between 20 and 70 atoms", suggesting that $ce{Hg_2}$ associate, if exists, have VdW bonding (i.e. not a chemical, but physical bond) only.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
According to IUPAC, the type of binding isn't relevant, as long as there is "a depression on the potential energy surface that is deep enough to confine at least one vibrational state" goldbook.iupac.org/html/M/M04002.html
$endgroup$
– DavePhD
6 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@DavePhD What IUPAC says and what is accepted in the community are two entirely different things.
$endgroup$
– permeakra
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
permeakra, I agree, and I cited a J. Chem. Phys. article that says "molecule Hg2" in the title. aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/1.443968 Here's one that says "Hg2 molecule". aip.scitation.org/doi/pdf/10.1063/1.449261
$endgroup$
– DavePhD
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@DavePhD Again, what is accepted in physics community (J. of Chemical Physics) and chemical community (like chemistry stackexchange) also are two entirely different things. $ce{He_2}$ associate is a thing and from physical perspective might be a molecule. But from chemical perspective He is not capable to form chemical bonds (except in conditions that are domain of physics) and thus $ce{He_2}$ is not a molecule. Same for $ce{Hg_2}$
$endgroup$
– permeakra
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
The Journal of Physical Chemistry, published by the American Chemical Society, says "the Hg2 molecule". pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jp952808p?journalCode=jpchax The Canadian Journal of Chemistry says "Hg2 molecule". nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/v68-031 It's just a word. It doesn't change the science.
$endgroup$
– DavePhD
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "431"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Jeppe Stig Nielsen is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f108186%2fdoes-a-neutral-dimercury-molecule-exist%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
There has been recent research on mercury dimers in its ground state. Bond energies, transition energies, band spectrum and other parameters has been calculated spectroscopically. Here are the abstracts of two papers on mercury dimer:
The potential energy curve of the ground electronic state of the Hg dimer has been calculated using the CCSD(T) procedure and relativistic effective core potentials. The calculated binding energy (0.047 eV) and equilibrium separation (3.72 Å) are in excellent agreement with experiment. A variety of properties, including the second virial coefficient, rotational and vibrational spectroscopic constants, and vibrational energy levels, have been calculated using this interatomic potential and agreement with experiment is good overall.(Source)
The mercury dimer is among the most weakly bound metal dimers and has been extensively studied. The ground state $ce{O^+_g}$ dissociation energy has been considered to lie between 0.55 eV (440 cm−1) and 0.091 eV (730 cm−1). We report here a spectroscopic study of $ce{Hg2}$ in a supersonic jet. The first optical transition, $ce{1_u←O^+_g}$, was characterized by its fluorescence excitation spectrum and the binding energy of the ground state has been measured precisely through the threshold of collision induced dissociation of $ce{Hg2 1_u}$ to $ce{Hg(^1S_0)+Hg(^3P_0)}$.(Source)
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
What does "has been calculated spectroscopically" mean? Do you mean "... and other spectroscopic parameters have been calculated"?
$endgroup$
– orthocresol♦
5 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There has been recent research on mercury dimers in its ground state. Bond energies, transition energies, band spectrum and other parameters has been calculated spectroscopically. Here are the abstracts of two papers on mercury dimer:
The potential energy curve of the ground electronic state of the Hg dimer has been calculated using the CCSD(T) procedure and relativistic effective core potentials. The calculated binding energy (0.047 eV) and equilibrium separation (3.72 Å) are in excellent agreement with experiment. A variety of properties, including the second virial coefficient, rotational and vibrational spectroscopic constants, and vibrational energy levels, have been calculated using this interatomic potential and agreement with experiment is good overall.(Source)
The mercury dimer is among the most weakly bound metal dimers and has been extensively studied. The ground state $ce{O^+_g}$ dissociation energy has been considered to lie between 0.55 eV (440 cm−1) and 0.091 eV (730 cm−1). We report here a spectroscopic study of $ce{Hg2}$ in a supersonic jet. The first optical transition, $ce{1_u←O^+_g}$, was characterized by its fluorescence excitation spectrum and the binding energy of the ground state has been measured precisely through the threshold of collision induced dissociation of $ce{Hg2 1_u}$ to $ce{Hg(^1S_0)+Hg(^3P_0)}$.(Source)
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
What does "has been calculated spectroscopically" mean? Do you mean "... and other spectroscopic parameters have been calculated"?
$endgroup$
– orthocresol♦
5 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There has been recent research on mercury dimers in its ground state. Bond energies, transition energies, band spectrum and other parameters has been calculated spectroscopically. Here are the abstracts of two papers on mercury dimer:
The potential energy curve of the ground electronic state of the Hg dimer has been calculated using the CCSD(T) procedure and relativistic effective core potentials. The calculated binding energy (0.047 eV) and equilibrium separation (3.72 Å) are in excellent agreement with experiment. A variety of properties, including the second virial coefficient, rotational and vibrational spectroscopic constants, and vibrational energy levels, have been calculated using this interatomic potential and agreement with experiment is good overall.(Source)
The mercury dimer is among the most weakly bound metal dimers and has been extensively studied. The ground state $ce{O^+_g}$ dissociation energy has been considered to lie between 0.55 eV (440 cm−1) and 0.091 eV (730 cm−1). We report here a spectroscopic study of $ce{Hg2}$ in a supersonic jet. The first optical transition, $ce{1_u←O^+_g}$, was characterized by its fluorescence excitation spectrum and the binding energy of the ground state has been measured precisely through the threshold of collision induced dissociation of $ce{Hg2 1_u}$ to $ce{Hg(^1S_0)+Hg(^3P_0)}$.(Source)
$endgroup$
There has been recent research on mercury dimers in its ground state. Bond energies, transition energies, band spectrum and other parameters has been calculated spectroscopically. Here are the abstracts of two papers on mercury dimer:
The potential energy curve of the ground electronic state of the Hg dimer has been calculated using the CCSD(T) procedure and relativistic effective core potentials. The calculated binding energy (0.047 eV) and equilibrium separation (3.72 Å) are in excellent agreement with experiment. A variety of properties, including the second virial coefficient, rotational and vibrational spectroscopic constants, and vibrational energy levels, have been calculated using this interatomic potential and agreement with experiment is good overall.(Source)
The mercury dimer is among the most weakly bound metal dimers and has been extensively studied. The ground state $ce{O^+_g}$ dissociation energy has been considered to lie between 0.55 eV (440 cm−1) and 0.091 eV (730 cm−1). We report here a spectroscopic study of $ce{Hg2}$ in a supersonic jet. The first optical transition, $ce{1_u←O^+_g}$, was characterized by its fluorescence excitation spectrum and the binding energy of the ground state has been measured precisely through the threshold of collision induced dissociation of $ce{Hg2 1_u}$ to $ce{Hg(^1S_0)+Hg(^3P_0)}$.(Source)
answered 6 hours ago
Nilay GhoshNilay Ghosh
9,230839101
9,230839101
$begingroup$
What does "has been calculated spectroscopically" mean? Do you mean "... and other spectroscopic parameters have been calculated"?
$endgroup$
– orthocresol♦
5 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What does "has been calculated spectroscopically" mean? Do you mean "... and other spectroscopic parameters have been calculated"?
$endgroup$
– orthocresol♦
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
What does "has been calculated spectroscopically" mean? Do you mean "... and other spectroscopic parameters have been calculated"?
$endgroup$
– orthocresol♦
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
What does "has been calculated spectroscopically" mean? Do you mean "... and other spectroscopic parameters have been calculated"?
$endgroup$
– orthocresol♦
5 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, $ce{Hg2}$ has a bond length of $pu{0.334nm}$ and a dissociation energy of $pu{7.5 kJ/mol}$.
See Mercury Handbook: Chemistry, Applications and Environmental Impact at page 10.
and
Mass spectrometric equilibrium study of the molecule $ce{Hg2}$ J. Chem. Phys. 1982, 77(3), 1425-1427 (https://doi.org/10.1063/1.443968).
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Respectfully, this isn't a molecule.
$endgroup$
– permeakra
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
@permeakra is the potential well enough to have at least one vibrational state?
$endgroup$
– DavePhD
6 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
Doesn't matter. Water dimer is not considered a molecule, even though the bonding it fairly strong.
$endgroup$
– permeakra
6 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@permeakra it matters to IUPAC goldbook.iupac.org/html/M/M04002.html
$endgroup$
– DavePhD
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, $ce{Hg2}$ has a bond length of $pu{0.334nm}$ and a dissociation energy of $pu{7.5 kJ/mol}$.
See Mercury Handbook: Chemistry, Applications and Environmental Impact at page 10.
and
Mass spectrometric equilibrium study of the molecule $ce{Hg2}$ J. Chem. Phys. 1982, 77(3), 1425-1427 (https://doi.org/10.1063/1.443968).
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Respectfully, this isn't a molecule.
$endgroup$
– permeakra
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
@permeakra is the potential well enough to have at least one vibrational state?
$endgroup$
– DavePhD
6 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
Doesn't matter. Water dimer is not considered a molecule, even though the bonding it fairly strong.
$endgroup$
– permeakra
6 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@permeakra it matters to IUPAC goldbook.iupac.org/html/M/M04002.html
$endgroup$
– DavePhD
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, $ce{Hg2}$ has a bond length of $pu{0.334nm}$ and a dissociation energy of $pu{7.5 kJ/mol}$.
See Mercury Handbook: Chemistry, Applications and Environmental Impact at page 10.
and
Mass spectrometric equilibrium study of the molecule $ce{Hg2}$ J. Chem. Phys. 1982, 77(3), 1425-1427 (https://doi.org/10.1063/1.443968).
$endgroup$
Yes, $ce{Hg2}$ has a bond length of $pu{0.334nm}$ and a dissociation energy of $pu{7.5 kJ/mol}$.
See Mercury Handbook: Chemistry, Applications and Environmental Impact at page 10.
and
Mass spectrometric equilibrium study of the molecule $ce{Hg2}$ J. Chem. Phys. 1982, 77(3), 1425-1427 (https://doi.org/10.1063/1.443968).
edited 5 hours ago
Mathew Mahindaratne
2328
2328
answered 6 hours ago
DavePhDDavePhD
35.3k259141
35.3k259141
1
$begingroup$
Respectfully, this isn't a molecule.
$endgroup$
– permeakra
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
@permeakra is the potential well enough to have at least one vibrational state?
$endgroup$
– DavePhD
6 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
Doesn't matter. Water dimer is not considered a molecule, even though the bonding it fairly strong.
$endgroup$
– permeakra
6 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@permeakra it matters to IUPAC goldbook.iupac.org/html/M/M04002.html
$endgroup$
– DavePhD
6 hours ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Respectfully, this isn't a molecule.
$endgroup$
– permeakra
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
@permeakra is the potential well enough to have at least one vibrational state?
$endgroup$
– DavePhD
6 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
Doesn't matter. Water dimer is not considered a molecule, even though the bonding it fairly strong.
$endgroup$
– permeakra
6 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@permeakra it matters to IUPAC goldbook.iupac.org/html/M/M04002.html
$endgroup$
– DavePhD
6 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Respectfully, this isn't a molecule.
$endgroup$
– permeakra
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
Respectfully, this isn't a molecule.
$endgroup$
– permeakra
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
@permeakra is the potential well enough to have at least one vibrational state?
$endgroup$
– DavePhD
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
@permeakra is the potential well enough to have at least one vibrational state?
$endgroup$
– DavePhD
6 hours ago
3
3
$begingroup$
Doesn't matter. Water dimer is not considered a molecule, even though the bonding it fairly strong.
$endgroup$
– permeakra
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
Doesn't matter. Water dimer is not considered a molecule, even though the bonding it fairly strong.
$endgroup$
– permeakra
6 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
@permeakra it matters to IUPAC goldbook.iupac.org/html/M/M04002.html
$endgroup$
– DavePhD
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
@permeakra it matters to IUPAC goldbook.iupac.org/html/M/M04002.html
$endgroup$
– DavePhD
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The nature of mercury associates was studied. Quick googling gave paper with words "$ce{Hg_x}$ cluster transition from VdW to metallic bahavior between 20 and 70 atoms", suggesting that $ce{Hg_2}$ associate, if exists, have VdW bonding (i.e. not a chemical, but physical bond) only.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
According to IUPAC, the type of binding isn't relevant, as long as there is "a depression on the potential energy surface that is deep enough to confine at least one vibrational state" goldbook.iupac.org/html/M/M04002.html
$endgroup$
– DavePhD
6 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@DavePhD What IUPAC says and what is accepted in the community are two entirely different things.
$endgroup$
– permeakra
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
permeakra, I agree, and I cited a J. Chem. Phys. article that says "molecule Hg2" in the title. aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/1.443968 Here's one that says "Hg2 molecule". aip.scitation.org/doi/pdf/10.1063/1.449261
$endgroup$
– DavePhD
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@DavePhD Again, what is accepted in physics community (J. of Chemical Physics) and chemical community (like chemistry stackexchange) also are two entirely different things. $ce{He_2}$ associate is a thing and from physical perspective might be a molecule. But from chemical perspective He is not capable to form chemical bonds (except in conditions that are domain of physics) and thus $ce{He_2}$ is not a molecule. Same for $ce{Hg_2}$
$endgroup$
– permeakra
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
The Journal of Physical Chemistry, published by the American Chemical Society, says "the Hg2 molecule". pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jp952808p?journalCode=jpchax The Canadian Journal of Chemistry says "Hg2 molecule". nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/v68-031 It's just a word. It doesn't change the science.
$endgroup$
– DavePhD
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The nature of mercury associates was studied. Quick googling gave paper with words "$ce{Hg_x}$ cluster transition from VdW to metallic bahavior between 20 and 70 atoms", suggesting that $ce{Hg_2}$ associate, if exists, have VdW bonding (i.e. not a chemical, but physical bond) only.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
According to IUPAC, the type of binding isn't relevant, as long as there is "a depression on the potential energy surface that is deep enough to confine at least one vibrational state" goldbook.iupac.org/html/M/M04002.html
$endgroup$
– DavePhD
6 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@DavePhD What IUPAC says and what is accepted in the community are two entirely different things.
$endgroup$
– permeakra
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
permeakra, I agree, and I cited a J. Chem. Phys. article that says "molecule Hg2" in the title. aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/1.443968 Here's one that says "Hg2 molecule". aip.scitation.org/doi/pdf/10.1063/1.449261
$endgroup$
– DavePhD
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@DavePhD Again, what is accepted in physics community (J. of Chemical Physics) and chemical community (like chemistry stackexchange) also are two entirely different things. $ce{He_2}$ associate is a thing and from physical perspective might be a molecule. But from chemical perspective He is not capable to form chemical bonds (except in conditions that are domain of physics) and thus $ce{He_2}$ is not a molecule. Same for $ce{Hg_2}$
$endgroup$
– permeakra
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
The Journal of Physical Chemistry, published by the American Chemical Society, says "the Hg2 molecule". pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jp952808p?journalCode=jpchax The Canadian Journal of Chemistry says "Hg2 molecule". nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/v68-031 It's just a word. It doesn't change the science.
$endgroup$
– DavePhD
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The nature of mercury associates was studied. Quick googling gave paper with words "$ce{Hg_x}$ cluster transition from VdW to metallic bahavior between 20 and 70 atoms", suggesting that $ce{Hg_2}$ associate, if exists, have VdW bonding (i.e. not a chemical, but physical bond) only.
$endgroup$
The nature of mercury associates was studied. Quick googling gave paper with words "$ce{Hg_x}$ cluster transition from VdW to metallic bahavior between 20 and 70 atoms", suggesting that $ce{Hg_2}$ associate, if exists, have VdW bonding (i.e. not a chemical, but physical bond) only.
answered 6 hours ago
permeakrapermeakra
17.9k13681
17.9k13681
1
$begingroup$
According to IUPAC, the type of binding isn't relevant, as long as there is "a depression on the potential energy surface that is deep enough to confine at least one vibrational state" goldbook.iupac.org/html/M/M04002.html
$endgroup$
– DavePhD
6 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@DavePhD What IUPAC says and what is accepted in the community are two entirely different things.
$endgroup$
– permeakra
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
permeakra, I agree, and I cited a J. Chem. Phys. article that says "molecule Hg2" in the title. aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/1.443968 Here's one that says "Hg2 molecule". aip.scitation.org/doi/pdf/10.1063/1.449261
$endgroup$
– DavePhD
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@DavePhD Again, what is accepted in physics community (J. of Chemical Physics) and chemical community (like chemistry stackexchange) also are two entirely different things. $ce{He_2}$ associate is a thing and from physical perspective might be a molecule. But from chemical perspective He is not capable to form chemical bonds (except in conditions that are domain of physics) and thus $ce{He_2}$ is not a molecule. Same for $ce{Hg_2}$
$endgroup$
– permeakra
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
The Journal of Physical Chemistry, published by the American Chemical Society, says "the Hg2 molecule". pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jp952808p?journalCode=jpchax The Canadian Journal of Chemistry says "Hg2 molecule". nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/v68-031 It's just a word. It doesn't change the science.
$endgroup$
– DavePhD
2 hours ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
According to IUPAC, the type of binding isn't relevant, as long as there is "a depression on the potential energy surface that is deep enough to confine at least one vibrational state" goldbook.iupac.org/html/M/M04002.html
$endgroup$
– DavePhD
6 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@DavePhD What IUPAC says and what is accepted in the community are two entirely different things.
$endgroup$
– permeakra
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
permeakra, I agree, and I cited a J. Chem. Phys. article that says "molecule Hg2" in the title. aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/1.443968 Here's one that says "Hg2 molecule". aip.scitation.org/doi/pdf/10.1063/1.449261
$endgroup$
– DavePhD
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@DavePhD Again, what is accepted in physics community (J. of Chemical Physics) and chemical community (like chemistry stackexchange) also are two entirely different things. $ce{He_2}$ associate is a thing and from physical perspective might be a molecule. But from chemical perspective He is not capable to form chemical bonds (except in conditions that are domain of physics) and thus $ce{He_2}$ is not a molecule. Same for $ce{Hg_2}$
$endgroup$
– permeakra
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
The Journal of Physical Chemistry, published by the American Chemical Society, says "the Hg2 molecule". pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jp952808p?journalCode=jpchax The Canadian Journal of Chemistry says "Hg2 molecule". nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/v68-031 It's just a word. It doesn't change the science.
$endgroup$
– DavePhD
2 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
According to IUPAC, the type of binding isn't relevant, as long as there is "a depression on the potential energy surface that is deep enough to confine at least one vibrational state" goldbook.iupac.org/html/M/M04002.html
$endgroup$
– DavePhD
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
According to IUPAC, the type of binding isn't relevant, as long as there is "a depression on the potential energy surface that is deep enough to confine at least one vibrational state" goldbook.iupac.org/html/M/M04002.html
$endgroup$
– DavePhD
6 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@DavePhD What IUPAC says and what is accepted in the community are two entirely different things.
$endgroup$
– permeakra
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
@DavePhD What IUPAC says and what is accepted in the community are two entirely different things.
$endgroup$
– permeakra
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
permeakra, I agree, and I cited a J. Chem. Phys. article that says "molecule Hg2" in the title. aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/1.443968 Here's one that says "Hg2 molecule". aip.scitation.org/doi/pdf/10.1063/1.449261
$endgroup$
– DavePhD
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
permeakra, I agree, and I cited a J. Chem. Phys. article that says "molecule Hg2" in the title. aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/1.443968 Here's one that says "Hg2 molecule". aip.scitation.org/doi/pdf/10.1063/1.449261
$endgroup$
– DavePhD
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@DavePhD Again, what is accepted in physics community (J. of Chemical Physics) and chemical community (like chemistry stackexchange) also are two entirely different things. $ce{He_2}$ associate is a thing and from physical perspective might be a molecule. But from chemical perspective He is not capable to form chemical bonds (except in conditions that are domain of physics) and thus $ce{He_2}$ is not a molecule. Same for $ce{Hg_2}$
$endgroup$
– permeakra
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@DavePhD Again, what is accepted in physics community (J. of Chemical Physics) and chemical community (like chemistry stackexchange) also are two entirely different things. $ce{He_2}$ associate is a thing and from physical perspective might be a molecule. But from chemical perspective He is not capable to form chemical bonds (except in conditions that are domain of physics) and thus $ce{He_2}$ is not a molecule. Same for $ce{Hg_2}$
$endgroup$
– permeakra
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
The Journal of Physical Chemistry, published by the American Chemical Society, says "the Hg2 molecule". pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jp952808p?journalCode=jpchax The Canadian Journal of Chemistry says "Hg2 molecule". nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/v68-031 It's just a word. It doesn't change the science.
$endgroup$
– DavePhD
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
The Journal of Physical Chemistry, published by the American Chemical Society, says "the Hg2 molecule". pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jp952808p?journalCode=jpchax The Canadian Journal of Chemistry says "Hg2 molecule". nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/v68-031 It's just a word. It doesn't change the science.
$endgroup$
– DavePhD
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Jeppe Stig Nielsen is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Jeppe Stig Nielsen is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Jeppe Stig Nielsen is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Jeppe Stig Nielsen is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Chemistry Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f108186%2fdoes-a-neutral-dimercury-molecule-exist%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown