A problem when integrate Cos[n*x]*Cos[k*x]












3












$begingroup$


When integrate the indefinite integral Cos[nx]Cos[kx] about x, where both k and n are positive integer, the result is Pi when n equals to k and 0 when n is unequal to k. However, the code 



sol = Integrate[Cos[n*x]*Cos[k*x], {x, -Pi, Pi}, 

  Assumptions -> n ∈ Integers && k ∈ Integers && n > 0 && k > 0]


gives the result (k Sin[π k + π n] - n Sin[π k + π n] +
k Sin[π k - π n] + n Sin[π k - π n])/(k^2 - n^2).
enter image description here



And then use the Simplify function, 



Simplify[sol, Assumptions -> n ∈ Integers && k ∈ Integers && n > 0 && k > 0]


gives the result 0. Shouldn't that Integrate returns a Piecewise function like Piecewise[{{Pi, n == k}, {0, n != k}}] instead?






calculus-and-analysis







share|improve this question









New contributor




shelure21 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$

















    3












    $begingroup$


    When integrate the indefinite integral Cos[nx]Cos[kx] about x, where both k and n are positive integer, the result is Pi when n equals to k and 0 when n is unequal to k. However, the code 



    sol = Integrate[Cos[n*x]*Cos[k*x], {x, -Pi, Pi}, 
    
  Assumptions -> n ∈ Integers && k ∈ Integers && n > 0 && k > 0]


    gives the result (k Sin[π k + π n] - n Sin[π k + π n] +
    k Sin[π k - π n] + n Sin[π k - π n])/(k^2 - n^2)    .
    enter image description here



    And then use the Simplify function, 



    Simplify[sol, Assumptions -> n ∈ Integers && k ∈ Integers && n > 0 && k > 0]


    gives the result 0. Shouldn't that Integrate returns a Piecewise function like Piecewise[{{Pi, n == k}, {0, n != k}}] instead?






    calculus-and-analysis







    share|improve this question









    New contributor




    shelure21 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.







    $endgroup$















      3












      3








      3


      1



      $begingroup$


      When integrate the indefinite integral Cos[nx]Cos[kx] about x, where both k and n are positive integer, the result is Pi when n equals to k and 0 when n is unequal to k. However, the code 



      sol = Integrate[Cos[n*x]*Cos[k*x], {x, -Pi, Pi}, 
      
  Assumptions -> n ∈ Integers && k ∈ Integers && n > 0 && k > 0]


      gives the result (k Sin[π k + π n] - n Sin[π k + π n] +
      k Sin[π k - π n] + n Sin[π k - π n])/(k^2 - n^2)      .
      enter image description here



      And then use the Simplify function, 



      Simplify[sol, Assumptions -> n ∈ Integers && k ∈ Integers && n > 0 && k > 0]


      gives the result 0. Shouldn't that Integrate returns a Piecewise function like Piecewise[{{Pi, n == k}, {0, n != k}}] instead?






      calculus-and-analysis







      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      shelure21 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.







      $endgroup$




      When integrate the indefinite integral Cos[nx]Cos[kx] about x, where both k and n are positive integer, the result is Pi when n equals to k and 0 when n is unequal to k. However, the code 



      sol = Integrate[Cos[n*x]*Cos[k*x], {x, -Pi, Pi}, 
      
  Assumptions -> n ∈ Integers && k ∈ Integers && n > 0 && k > 0]


      gives the result (k Sin[π k + π n] - n Sin[π k + π n] +
      k Sin[π k - π n] + n Sin[π k - π n])/(k^2 - n^2)      .
      enter image description here



      And then use the Simplify function, 



      Simplify[sol, Assumptions -> n ∈ Integers && k ∈ Integers && n > 0 && k > 0]


      gives the result 0. Shouldn't that Integrate returns a Piecewise function like Piecewise[{{Pi, n == k}, {0, n != k}}] instead?






      calculus-and-analysis




      calculus-and-analysis






      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      shelure21 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      shelure21 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 2 hours ago









      Mr.Wizard♦

      231k294751042




      231k294751042






      New contributor




      shelure21 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 4 hours ago









      shelure21shelure21

      184




      184




      New contributor




      shelure21 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      shelure21 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      shelure21 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4












          $begingroup$

          This is well know issue. One way to handle it is 



          Simplify[ sol, 
          
 Assumptions -> Element[n, Integers] && Element[k, Integers] && n > 0 && k > 0 && k != n]
          

          
(* 0 *)


          And



          Simplify[ Limit[sol, k -> n], 
          
 Assumptions -> Element[n, Integers] && Element[k, Integers] && n > 0 && k > 0 && k == n ]
          

          
(* Pi *)


          See



          should-integrate-detect-orthogonality-of-functions-in-the-integrand



          And



          What assumptions to use to check for orthogonality



          And



          should-integrate-have-given-zero-for-this-integral



          And



          proper-way-to-simplify-integral-result-in-mathematica-given-integer-constraints



          And



          usage-of-assuming-for-integration






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            You can shorten the Limit to Limit[sol, k -> n, Assumptions -> Element[n, Integers]]
            $endgroup$
            – Bob Hanlon
            36 mins ago










          • $begingroup$
            @BobHanlon thanks. I am sure you are right. I was only copying what the OP had in there. But good point.
            $endgroup$
            – Nasser
            21 mins ago











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "387"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });






          shelure21 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f190139%2fa-problem-when-integrate-cosnxcoskx%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          4












          $begingroup$

          This is well know issue. One way to handle it is 



          Simplify[ sol, 
          
 Assumptions -> Element[n, Integers] && Element[k, Integers] && n > 0 && k > 0 && k != n]
          

          
(* 0 *)


          And



          Simplify[ Limit[sol, k -> n], 
          
 Assumptions -> Element[n, Integers] && Element[k, Integers] && n > 0 && k > 0 && k == n ]
          

          
(* Pi *)


          See



          should-integrate-detect-orthogonality-of-functions-in-the-integrand



          And



          What assumptions to use to check for orthogonality



          And



          should-integrate-have-given-zero-for-this-integral



          And



          proper-way-to-simplify-integral-result-in-mathematica-given-integer-constraints



          And



          usage-of-assuming-for-integration






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            You can shorten the Limit to Limit[sol, k -> n, Assumptions -> Element[n, Integers]]
            $endgroup$
            – Bob Hanlon
            36 mins ago










          • $begingroup$
            @BobHanlon thanks. I am sure you are right. I was only copying what the OP had in there. But good point.
            $endgroup$
            – Nasser
            21 mins ago
















          4












          $begingroup$

          This is well know issue. One way to handle it is 



          Simplify[ sol, 
          
 Assumptions -> Element[n, Integers] && Element[k, Integers] && n > 0 && k > 0 && k != n]
          

          
(* 0 *)


          And



          Simplify[ Limit[sol, k -> n], 
          
 Assumptions -> Element[n, Integers] && Element[k, Integers] && n > 0 && k > 0 && k == n ]
          

          
(* Pi *)


          See



          should-integrate-detect-orthogonality-of-functions-in-the-integrand



          And



          What assumptions to use to check for orthogonality



          And



          should-integrate-have-given-zero-for-this-integral



          And



          proper-way-to-simplify-integral-result-in-mathematica-given-integer-constraints



          And



          usage-of-assuming-for-integration






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            You can shorten the Limit to Limit[sol, k -> n, Assumptions -> Element[n, Integers]]
            $endgroup$
            – Bob Hanlon
            36 mins ago










          • $begingroup$
            @BobHanlon thanks. I am sure you are right. I was only copying what the OP had in there. But good point.
            $endgroup$
            – Nasser
            21 mins ago














          4












          4








          4





          $begingroup$

          This is well know issue. One way to handle it is 



          Simplify[ sol, 
          
 Assumptions -> Element[n, Integers] && Element[k, Integers] && n > 0 && k > 0 && k != n]
          

          
(* 0 *)


          And



          Simplify[ Limit[sol, k -> n], 
          
 Assumptions -> Element[n, Integers] && Element[k, Integers] && n > 0 && k > 0 && k == n ]
          

          
(* Pi *)


          See



          should-integrate-detect-orthogonality-of-functions-in-the-integrand



          And



          What assumptions to use to check for orthogonality



          And



          should-integrate-have-given-zero-for-this-integral



          And



          proper-way-to-simplify-integral-result-in-mathematica-given-integer-constraints



          And



          usage-of-assuming-for-integration






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          This is well know issue. One way to handle it is 



          Simplify[ sol, 
          
 Assumptions -> Element[n, Integers] && Element[k, Integers] && n > 0 && k > 0 && k != n]
          

          
(* 0 *)


          And



          Simplify[ Limit[sol, k -> n], 
          
 Assumptions -> Element[n, Integers] && Element[k, Integers] && n > 0 && k > 0 && k == n ]
          

          
(* Pi *)


          See



          should-integrate-detect-orthogonality-of-functions-in-the-integrand



          And



          What assumptions to use to check for orthogonality



          And



          should-integrate-have-given-zero-for-this-integral



          And



          proper-way-to-simplify-integral-result-in-mathematica-given-integer-constraints



          And



          usage-of-assuming-for-integration







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 3 hours ago









          NasserNasser

          57.7k488205




          57.7k488205












          • $begingroup$
            You can shorten the Limit to Limit[sol, k -> n, Assumptions -> Element[n, Integers]]
            $endgroup$
            – Bob Hanlon
            36 mins ago










          • $begingroup$
            @BobHanlon thanks. I am sure you are right. I was only copying what the OP had in there. But good point.
            $endgroup$
            – Nasser
            21 mins ago


















          • $begingroup$
            You can shorten the Limit to Limit[sol, k -> n, Assumptions -> Element[n, Integers]]
            $endgroup$
            – Bob Hanlon
            36 mins ago










          • $begingroup$
            @BobHanlon thanks. I am sure you are right. I was only copying what the OP had in there. But good point.
            $endgroup$
            – Nasser
            21 mins ago
















          $begingroup$
          You can shorten the Limit to Limit[sol, k -> n, Assumptions -> Element[n, Integers]]
          $endgroup$
          – Bob Hanlon
          36 mins ago




          $begingroup$
          You can shorten the Limit to Limit[sol, k -> n, Assumptions -> Element[n, Integers]]
          $endgroup$
          – Bob Hanlon
          36 mins ago












          $begingroup$
          @BobHanlon thanks. I am sure you are right. I was only copying what the OP had in there. But good point.
          $endgroup$
          – Nasser
          21 mins ago




          $begingroup$
          @BobHanlon thanks. I am sure you are right. I was only copying what the OP had in there. But good point.
          $endgroup$
          – Nasser
          21 mins ago










          shelure21 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          shelure21 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













          shelure21 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












          shelure21 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid …



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f190139%2fa-problem-when-integrate-cosnxcoskx%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          -

          Popular posts from this blog

          Сан-Квентин

          Image
          Сан-Квентин Местоположение Сан-Квентин, Калифорния Координаты 37°56′13″ с. ш. 122°29′20″ з. д. H G Я O L Текущий статус Действует Режим безопасности минимальный и максимальный Количество мест 3 302 Открытие Июнь 1852 Находится в ведомстве California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Начальник Mike Martel, начальник  Сан-Квентин на Викискладе Сан-Квентин (англ.  San Quentin ) — тюрьма, располагающаяся на 432 акрах (около 1,7 км²), на мысе Сан-Квентин, в округе Марин, штат Калифорния, США. Тюрьма штата Калифорния Сан-Квентин была открыта в июле 1852 года и является старейшей в штате. Она была построена заключёнными, которые проживали в течение строительства на тюремном судне Вабан. В Сан-Квентине отбывали наказание и мужчины, и женщины до 1934 года, когда построили женскую тюрьму в Техачапи и туда перевели всех заключённых женщин. В Сан-Квентине приводятся в исполнение смертные казни, для этого имеется газовая камера, но...
          Read more

          8-я гвардейская общевойсковая армия

          Image
          8-я гвардейская общевойсковая ордена Ленина армия Награды: Войска: РККА → Советская армия → СВ России Род войск: Формирование: 1943 Расформирование (преобразование): 1992 Предшественник: 62-я армия (1942—43) → 8-я гвардейская общевойсковая армия (1943—92) → 8-й гвардейский армейский корпус (1992—98) Боевой путь Изюм-Барвенковская операция Донбасская операция Запорожская операция Битва за Днепр Днепропетровская операция Березнеговато-Снигирёвская операция Одесская операция Люблин-Брестская операция Варшавско-Познанская операция Восточно-Померанская операция Берлинская наступательная операция У этого термина существуют и другие значения, см. 8-я армия. Фотография Гвардейского Красного Знамени (лицевая сторона) 8-й гвардейской армии , образца 1943 года. Фотография Гвардейского Красного Знамени (оборотная сторона) 8-й гвардейской армии , образца 1943 года. 8-я гвардейская общевойсковая ордена Ленина армия  — гвардейское фор...
          Read more

          Алькесар

          Image
          Муниципалитет Алькесар Alquézar Герб 42°10′16″ с. ш. 0°01′27″ в. д. H G Я O L Страна Испания   Испания Автономное сообщество Арагон Провинция Уэска Комарка Сомонтано-де-Барбастро Алькальд Хосе Марияно Альтемир Ласкорс (ИСРП) История и география Площадь 32,36 км² Высота НУМ 660 м Часовой пояс UTC+1, летом UTC+2 Население Население 313 человек ( 2010 ) Плотность 9,92 чел./км² Этнохороним alquezarano/-a Цифровые идентификаторы Телефонный код +34 974 Почтовые индексы 22112 Автомобильный код HU alquezar.org   (исп.) Показать/скрыть карты Алькесар Алькесар Алькесар  Аудио, фото и видео на Викискладе Алькесар (исп.  Alquézar ) — муниципалитет в Испании, входит в провинцию Уэска, в составе автономного сообщества Арагон. Муниципалитет находится в составе района (комарки) Сомонтано-де-Барбастро. Занимает площадь 32,36 км². Население — 321 челове...
          Read more