Find existence of limit
Show that $left(frac{1}{|x|} +frac{1}{|y |}right)$ tends to infinity as $(x,y)$ tends to $(0,0)$.
I have used $x=rcos alpha$ and $y=rsin alpha$, $r>0$.But I got stuck as $left(frac{1}{|cos alpha|} +frac{1}{ |rsin alpha|}right) left(frac{1}{r}right)$ lies between $frac{1}{r}$ and infinity.
calculus limits
add a comment |
Show that $left(frac{1}{|x|} +frac{1}{|y |}right)$ tends to infinity as $(x,y)$ tends to $(0,0)$.
I have used $x=rcos alpha$ and $y=rsin alpha$, $r>0$.But I got stuck as $left(frac{1}{|cos alpha|} +frac{1}{ |rsin alpha|}right) left(frac{1}{r}right)$ lies between $frac{1}{r}$ and infinity.
calculus limits
3
"I got stuck as" has a mistake with the $r$ in the denominator.
– Teepeemm
Dec 13 at 20:31
add a comment |
Show that $left(frac{1}{|x|} +frac{1}{|y |}right)$ tends to infinity as $(x,y)$ tends to $(0,0)$.
I have used $x=rcos alpha$ and $y=rsin alpha$, $r>0$.But I got stuck as $left(frac{1}{|cos alpha|} +frac{1}{ |rsin alpha|}right) left(frac{1}{r}right)$ lies between $frac{1}{r}$ and infinity.
calculus limits
Show that $left(frac{1}{|x|} +frac{1}{|y |}right)$ tends to infinity as $(x,y)$ tends to $(0,0)$.
I have used $x=rcos alpha$ and $y=rsin alpha$, $r>0$.But I got stuck as $left(frac{1}{|cos alpha|} +frac{1}{ |rsin alpha|}right) left(frac{1}{r}right)$ lies between $frac{1}{r}$ and infinity.
calculus limits
calculus limits
edited Dec 16 at 11:54
Jam
4,94711431
4,94711431
asked Dec 13 at 14:32
Kashmira
463
463
3
"I got stuck as" has a mistake with the $r$ in the denominator.
– Teepeemm
Dec 13 at 20:31
add a comment |
3
"I got stuck as" has a mistake with the $r$ in the denominator.
– Teepeemm
Dec 13 at 20:31
3
3
"I got stuck as" has a mistake with the $r$ in the denominator.
– Teepeemm
Dec 13 at 20:31
"I got stuck as" has a mistake with the $r$ in the denominator.
– Teepeemm
Dec 13 at 20:31
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
Note that
$$frac1{|x|}+frac1{|y|}ge frac1{|x|}to infty$$
add a comment |
Take the individual limits of each component. x and y are tending towards zero (the direction doesn't matter due to the magnitudes) so $frac{1}{|x|}$ and $frac{1}{|y|}$ both tend to infinity, and as a result so does their sum.
EDIT:
As suggested in the comments, this is an expansion as to why you can seperate the limits.
$$lim_{(x,y)to(0,0)}{bigg(frac{1}{|x|}+frac{1}{|y|}bigg)}=lim_{(x,y)to(0,0)}{bigg(frac{1}{|x|}bigg)}+lim_{(x,y)to(0,0)}{bigg(frac{1}{|y|}bigg)}$$
Examining the LHS we see that the first limit is independent of y, and the second independent of x. As a result we can rewrite the equation as follows:
$$=lim_{xto0}{bigg(frac{1}{|x|}bigg)}+lim_{yto0}{bigg(frac{1}{|y|}bigg)}$$
As stated above, the magnitudes mean that both limits tend to infinity as x and y tend to zero from either direction, so their sum is necessarily also infinity.
2
You are right, but a few more words about why taking "individual limits of each component" can replace $(x,y)to (0,0)$ would be helpful in the present circumstance.
– hardmath
Dec 13 at 14:44
Thank you for the advice, I'll add an edit expanding on that.
– M.M.
Dec 14 at 10:06
add a comment |
Hint:
Use the fact that if $|(x,y)| < epsilon$, then $|x|<epsilon$ and $|y|<epsilon$
add a comment |
We have:
$(x,y) rightarrow 0.$
Let $epsilon_n =1/n$, $n$ positive integer, be given.
Then $|(x^2+y^2)^{1/2}| < delta_n$ $(=epsilon_n)$ implies
$|(x^2+y^2)^{1/2}| < epsilon_n =1/n$, or
$n=1/epsilon_n lt dfrac{1}{(x^2+y^2)^{1/2}}.$
Note:
$(x^2+y^2)^{1/2} ge |x|$, and
$(x^2+y^2)^{1/2} ge |y|.$
Then
$dfrac{2}{(x^2+y^2)^{1/2}} le dfrac{1}{|x|}+dfrac{1}{|y|}.$
And finally :
$|(x^2+y^2)^{1/2}| lt delta_n$ implies
$2n =2/epsilon_n lt dfrac{2}{(x^2+y^2)^{1/2}} le $
$dfrac{1}{|x|} +dfrac{1}{|y|}.$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3038078%2ffind-existence-of-limit%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Note that
$$frac1{|x|}+frac1{|y|}ge frac1{|x|}to infty$$
add a comment |
Note that
$$frac1{|x|}+frac1{|y|}ge frac1{|x|}to infty$$
add a comment |
Note that
$$frac1{|x|}+frac1{|y|}ge frac1{|x|}to infty$$
Note that
$$frac1{|x|}+frac1{|y|}ge frac1{|x|}to infty$$
answered Dec 13 at 14:37
gimusi
1
1
add a comment |
add a comment |
Take the individual limits of each component. x and y are tending towards zero (the direction doesn't matter due to the magnitudes) so $frac{1}{|x|}$ and $frac{1}{|y|}$ both tend to infinity, and as a result so does their sum.
EDIT:
As suggested in the comments, this is an expansion as to why you can seperate the limits.
$$lim_{(x,y)to(0,0)}{bigg(frac{1}{|x|}+frac{1}{|y|}bigg)}=lim_{(x,y)to(0,0)}{bigg(frac{1}{|x|}bigg)}+lim_{(x,y)to(0,0)}{bigg(frac{1}{|y|}bigg)}$$
Examining the LHS we see that the first limit is independent of y, and the second independent of x. As a result we can rewrite the equation as follows:
$$=lim_{xto0}{bigg(frac{1}{|x|}bigg)}+lim_{yto0}{bigg(frac{1}{|y|}bigg)}$$
As stated above, the magnitudes mean that both limits tend to infinity as x and y tend to zero from either direction, so their sum is necessarily also infinity.
2
You are right, but a few more words about why taking "individual limits of each component" can replace $(x,y)to (0,0)$ would be helpful in the present circumstance.
– hardmath
Dec 13 at 14:44
Thank you for the advice, I'll add an edit expanding on that.
– M.M.
Dec 14 at 10:06
add a comment |
Take the individual limits of each component. x and y are tending towards zero (the direction doesn't matter due to the magnitudes) so $frac{1}{|x|}$ and $frac{1}{|y|}$ both tend to infinity, and as a result so does their sum.
EDIT:
As suggested in the comments, this is an expansion as to why you can seperate the limits.
$$lim_{(x,y)to(0,0)}{bigg(frac{1}{|x|}+frac{1}{|y|}bigg)}=lim_{(x,y)to(0,0)}{bigg(frac{1}{|x|}bigg)}+lim_{(x,y)to(0,0)}{bigg(frac{1}{|y|}bigg)}$$
Examining the LHS we see that the first limit is independent of y, and the second independent of x. As a result we can rewrite the equation as follows:
$$=lim_{xto0}{bigg(frac{1}{|x|}bigg)}+lim_{yto0}{bigg(frac{1}{|y|}bigg)}$$
As stated above, the magnitudes mean that both limits tend to infinity as x and y tend to zero from either direction, so their sum is necessarily also infinity.
2
You are right, but a few more words about why taking "individual limits of each component" can replace $(x,y)to (0,0)$ would be helpful in the present circumstance.
– hardmath
Dec 13 at 14:44
Thank you for the advice, I'll add an edit expanding on that.
– M.M.
Dec 14 at 10:06
add a comment |
Take the individual limits of each component. x and y are tending towards zero (the direction doesn't matter due to the magnitudes) so $frac{1}{|x|}$ and $frac{1}{|y|}$ both tend to infinity, and as a result so does their sum.
EDIT:
As suggested in the comments, this is an expansion as to why you can seperate the limits.
$$lim_{(x,y)to(0,0)}{bigg(frac{1}{|x|}+frac{1}{|y|}bigg)}=lim_{(x,y)to(0,0)}{bigg(frac{1}{|x|}bigg)}+lim_{(x,y)to(0,0)}{bigg(frac{1}{|y|}bigg)}$$
Examining the LHS we see that the first limit is independent of y, and the second independent of x. As a result we can rewrite the equation as follows:
$$=lim_{xto0}{bigg(frac{1}{|x|}bigg)}+lim_{yto0}{bigg(frac{1}{|y|}bigg)}$$
As stated above, the magnitudes mean that both limits tend to infinity as x and y tend to zero from either direction, so their sum is necessarily also infinity.
Take the individual limits of each component. x and y are tending towards zero (the direction doesn't matter due to the magnitudes) so $frac{1}{|x|}$ and $frac{1}{|y|}$ both tend to infinity, and as a result so does their sum.
EDIT:
As suggested in the comments, this is an expansion as to why you can seperate the limits.
$$lim_{(x,y)to(0,0)}{bigg(frac{1}{|x|}+frac{1}{|y|}bigg)}=lim_{(x,y)to(0,0)}{bigg(frac{1}{|x|}bigg)}+lim_{(x,y)to(0,0)}{bigg(frac{1}{|y|}bigg)}$$
Examining the LHS we see that the first limit is independent of y, and the second independent of x. As a result we can rewrite the equation as follows:
$$=lim_{xto0}{bigg(frac{1}{|x|}bigg)}+lim_{yto0}{bigg(frac{1}{|y|}bigg)}$$
As stated above, the magnitudes mean that both limits tend to infinity as x and y tend to zero from either direction, so their sum is necessarily also infinity.
edited Dec 14 at 10:12
answered Dec 13 at 14:35
M.M.
637
637
2
You are right, but a few more words about why taking "individual limits of each component" can replace $(x,y)to (0,0)$ would be helpful in the present circumstance.
– hardmath
Dec 13 at 14:44
Thank you for the advice, I'll add an edit expanding on that.
– M.M.
Dec 14 at 10:06
add a comment |
2
You are right, but a few more words about why taking "individual limits of each component" can replace $(x,y)to (0,0)$ would be helpful in the present circumstance.
– hardmath
Dec 13 at 14:44
Thank you for the advice, I'll add an edit expanding on that.
– M.M.
Dec 14 at 10:06
2
2
You are right, but a few more words about why taking "individual limits of each component" can replace $(x,y)to (0,0)$ would be helpful in the present circumstance.
– hardmath
Dec 13 at 14:44
You are right, but a few more words about why taking "individual limits of each component" can replace $(x,y)to (0,0)$ would be helpful in the present circumstance.
– hardmath
Dec 13 at 14:44
Thank you for the advice, I'll add an edit expanding on that.
– M.M.
Dec 14 at 10:06
Thank you for the advice, I'll add an edit expanding on that.
– M.M.
Dec 14 at 10:06
add a comment |
Hint:
Use the fact that if $|(x,y)| < epsilon$, then $|x|<epsilon$ and $|y|<epsilon$
add a comment |
Hint:
Use the fact that if $|(x,y)| < epsilon$, then $|x|<epsilon$ and $|y|<epsilon$
add a comment |
Hint:
Use the fact that if $|(x,y)| < epsilon$, then $|x|<epsilon$ and $|y|<epsilon$
Hint:
Use the fact that if $|(x,y)| < epsilon$, then $|x|<epsilon$ and $|y|<epsilon$
answered Dec 13 at 14:34
5xum
89.5k393161
89.5k393161
add a comment |
add a comment |
We have:
$(x,y) rightarrow 0.$
Let $epsilon_n =1/n$, $n$ positive integer, be given.
Then $|(x^2+y^2)^{1/2}| < delta_n$ $(=epsilon_n)$ implies
$|(x^2+y^2)^{1/2}| < epsilon_n =1/n$, or
$n=1/epsilon_n lt dfrac{1}{(x^2+y^2)^{1/2}}.$
Note:
$(x^2+y^2)^{1/2} ge |x|$, and
$(x^2+y^2)^{1/2} ge |y|.$
Then
$dfrac{2}{(x^2+y^2)^{1/2}} le dfrac{1}{|x|}+dfrac{1}{|y|}.$
And finally :
$|(x^2+y^2)^{1/2}| lt delta_n$ implies
$2n =2/epsilon_n lt dfrac{2}{(x^2+y^2)^{1/2}} le $
$dfrac{1}{|x|} +dfrac{1}{|y|}.$
add a comment |
We have:
$(x,y) rightarrow 0.$
Let $epsilon_n =1/n$, $n$ positive integer, be given.
Then $|(x^2+y^2)^{1/2}| < delta_n$ $(=epsilon_n)$ implies
$|(x^2+y^2)^{1/2}| < epsilon_n =1/n$, or
$n=1/epsilon_n lt dfrac{1}{(x^2+y^2)^{1/2}}.$
Note:
$(x^2+y^2)^{1/2} ge |x|$, and
$(x^2+y^2)^{1/2} ge |y|.$
Then
$dfrac{2}{(x^2+y^2)^{1/2}} le dfrac{1}{|x|}+dfrac{1}{|y|}.$
And finally :
$|(x^2+y^2)^{1/2}| lt delta_n$ implies
$2n =2/epsilon_n lt dfrac{2}{(x^2+y^2)^{1/2}} le $
$dfrac{1}{|x|} +dfrac{1}{|y|}.$
add a comment |
We have:
$(x,y) rightarrow 0.$
Let $epsilon_n =1/n$, $n$ positive integer, be given.
Then $|(x^2+y^2)^{1/2}| < delta_n$ $(=epsilon_n)$ implies
$|(x^2+y^2)^{1/2}| < epsilon_n =1/n$, or
$n=1/epsilon_n lt dfrac{1}{(x^2+y^2)^{1/2}}.$
Note:
$(x^2+y^2)^{1/2} ge |x|$, and
$(x^2+y^2)^{1/2} ge |y|.$
Then
$dfrac{2}{(x^2+y^2)^{1/2}} le dfrac{1}{|x|}+dfrac{1}{|y|}.$
And finally :
$|(x^2+y^2)^{1/2}| lt delta_n$ implies
$2n =2/epsilon_n lt dfrac{2}{(x^2+y^2)^{1/2}} le $
$dfrac{1}{|x|} +dfrac{1}{|y|}.$
We have:
$(x,y) rightarrow 0.$
Let $epsilon_n =1/n$, $n$ positive integer, be given.
Then $|(x^2+y^2)^{1/2}| < delta_n$ $(=epsilon_n)$ implies
$|(x^2+y^2)^{1/2}| < epsilon_n =1/n$, or
$n=1/epsilon_n lt dfrac{1}{(x^2+y^2)^{1/2}}.$
Note:
$(x^2+y^2)^{1/2} ge |x|$, and
$(x^2+y^2)^{1/2} ge |y|.$
Then
$dfrac{2}{(x^2+y^2)^{1/2}} le dfrac{1}{|x|}+dfrac{1}{|y|}.$
And finally :
$|(x^2+y^2)^{1/2}| lt delta_n$ implies
$2n =2/epsilon_n lt dfrac{2}{(x^2+y^2)^{1/2}} le $
$dfrac{1}{|x|} +dfrac{1}{|y|}.$
edited Dec 13 at 17:05
answered Dec 13 at 16:57
Peter Szilas
10.6k2720
10.6k2720
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3038078%2ffind-existence-of-limit%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
"I got stuck as" has a mistake with the $r$ in the denominator.
– Teepeemm
Dec 13 at 20:31