Is this co-worker relationship salvageable?





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}






up vote
46
down vote

favorite
5












Ok, I'll try to summarise the last several months of my experience in a few paragraphs.



I've been at my company for a little over 18 months. At first I entered as a junior developer, since I only had 2 years experience. After around 6 months, my line-manager (call him Steve), offered me a senior position, as they had interviewed many people for it and had not filled it. I told him I would accept as long as he promised to train me up, as I felt I was not suitably qualified at the time. Until this point, myself, Steve and a couple of the others were all friends, having a good time at work and doing social things outside the office.



Then everything changed. I don't know why, but I think Steve regretted giving me the position. He began speaking to me in unacceptable ways, i.e. swearing, barking orders at me and criticising everything I did, often verging on basically calling me stupid. The training he provided was basically writing code in front of me really fast. I didn't pick much up this way, but could tell he was trying to teach, so felt bad to say anything.



I kept a log of all of this and eventually, after 6 months of it, went to HR. I made a formal complaint about him and submitted details of exactly what he had said to me with times and dates and even a couple of witness' within the team.



HR investigated the case for several weeks, (during which time I had no work, as they said I could not work with Steve during the investigation, so I had nothing to do for 10 weeks, but still getting paid).



The outcome is that HR are doing nothing and that none of my claims can be upheld. Basically, he lied about everything, saying he didn't speak to me like that and shockingly, my colleagues lied for him as well, saying they never heard anything.



So now I'm in a position where I have no work, and he is refusing to accept meeting invites from me now the investigation is over to try and get some work and basically just move forward.



How can I salvage/repair this situation and co-worker relationship?



Before anyone suggests it, yes my line-manager has a manager of his own, unfortunately they are very good friends outside of work, so I've tried that route with no success.










share|improve this question




















  • 9




    @Cloud well, in your question you don't mention any attempts of "sorting it out". In fact, your words "I didn't pick much up this way, but could tell he was trying to teach, so felt bad to say anything" explicitly contradict it.
    – IMil
    Nov 23 at 2:17






  • 12




    What country? Employment laws may be relevant.
    – user
    Nov 23 at 9:21






  • 1




    @user OP has indicated on Aviation (specifically in LAPL vs PPL - Which is more suitable?) on Oct 5 '18 that they were in the UK. So this seems very likely to be UK.
    – a CVn
    Nov 23 at 18:14








  • 2




    I think question would benefit from more information on the HR-related thread. On the face value, it seems that the employed HR procedures are very weak. Did HR folk try to find any evidence corroborating your statemnts? It almost reads as: - He said this to me. No, I didn't. OK, that's fine. Not very professional.
    – Konrad
    Nov 26 at 10:59

















up vote
46
down vote

favorite
5












Ok, I'll try to summarise the last several months of my experience in a few paragraphs.



I've been at my company for a little over 18 months. At first I entered as a junior developer, since I only had 2 years experience. After around 6 months, my line-manager (call him Steve), offered me a senior position, as they had interviewed many people for it and had not filled it. I told him I would accept as long as he promised to train me up, as I felt I was not suitably qualified at the time. Until this point, myself, Steve and a couple of the others were all friends, having a good time at work and doing social things outside the office.



Then everything changed. I don't know why, but I think Steve regretted giving me the position. He began speaking to me in unacceptable ways, i.e. swearing, barking orders at me and criticising everything I did, often verging on basically calling me stupid. The training he provided was basically writing code in front of me really fast. I didn't pick much up this way, but could tell he was trying to teach, so felt bad to say anything.



I kept a log of all of this and eventually, after 6 months of it, went to HR. I made a formal complaint about him and submitted details of exactly what he had said to me with times and dates and even a couple of witness' within the team.



HR investigated the case for several weeks, (during which time I had no work, as they said I could not work with Steve during the investigation, so I had nothing to do for 10 weeks, but still getting paid).



The outcome is that HR are doing nothing and that none of my claims can be upheld. Basically, he lied about everything, saying he didn't speak to me like that and shockingly, my colleagues lied for him as well, saying they never heard anything.



So now I'm in a position where I have no work, and he is refusing to accept meeting invites from me now the investigation is over to try and get some work and basically just move forward.



How can I salvage/repair this situation and co-worker relationship?



Before anyone suggests it, yes my line-manager has a manager of his own, unfortunately they are very good friends outside of work, so I've tried that route with no success.










share|improve this question




















  • 9




    @Cloud well, in your question you don't mention any attempts of "sorting it out". In fact, your words "I didn't pick much up this way, but could tell he was trying to teach, so felt bad to say anything" explicitly contradict it.
    – IMil
    Nov 23 at 2:17






  • 12




    What country? Employment laws may be relevant.
    – user
    Nov 23 at 9:21






  • 1




    @user OP has indicated on Aviation (specifically in LAPL vs PPL - Which is more suitable?) on Oct 5 '18 that they were in the UK. So this seems very likely to be UK.
    – a CVn
    Nov 23 at 18:14








  • 2




    I think question would benefit from more information on the HR-related thread. On the face value, it seems that the employed HR procedures are very weak. Did HR folk try to find any evidence corroborating your statemnts? It almost reads as: - He said this to me. No, I didn't. OK, that's fine. Not very professional.
    – Konrad
    Nov 26 at 10:59













up vote
46
down vote

favorite
5









up vote
46
down vote

favorite
5






5





Ok, I'll try to summarise the last several months of my experience in a few paragraphs.



I've been at my company for a little over 18 months. At first I entered as a junior developer, since I only had 2 years experience. After around 6 months, my line-manager (call him Steve), offered me a senior position, as they had interviewed many people for it and had not filled it. I told him I would accept as long as he promised to train me up, as I felt I was not suitably qualified at the time. Until this point, myself, Steve and a couple of the others were all friends, having a good time at work and doing social things outside the office.



Then everything changed. I don't know why, but I think Steve regretted giving me the position. He began speaking to me in unacceptable ways, i.e. swearing, barking orders at me and criticising everything I did, often verging on basically calling me stupid. The training he provided was basically writing code in front of me really fast. I didn't pick much up this way, but could tell he was trying to teach, so felt bad to say anything.



I kept a log of all of this and eventually, after 6 months of it, went to HR. I made a formal complaint about him and submitted details of exactly what he had said to me with times and dates and even a couple of witness' within the team.



HR investigated the case for several weeks, (during which time I had no work, as they said I could not work with Steve during the investigation, so I had nothing to do for 10 weeks, but still getting paid).



The outcome is that HR are doing nothing and that none of my claims can be upheld. Basically, he lied about everything, saying he didn't speak to me like that and shockingly, my colleagues lied for him as well, saying they never heard anything.



So now I'm in a position where I have no work, and he is refusing to accept meeting invites from me now the investigation is over to try and get some work and basically just move forward.



How can I salvage/repair this situation and co-worker relationship?



Before anyone suggests it, yes my line-manager has a manager of his own, unfortunately they are very good friends outside of work, so I've tried that route with no success.










share|improve this question















Ok, I'll try to summarise the last several months of my experience in a few paragraphs.



I've been at my company for a little over 18 months. At first I entered as a junior developer, since I only had 2 years experience. After around 6 months, my line-manager (call him Steve), offered me a senior position, as they had interviewed many people for it and had not filled it. I told him I would accept as long as he promised to train me up, as I felt I was not suitably qualified at the time. Until this point, myself, Steve and a couple of the others were all friends, having a good time at work and doing social things outside the office.



Then everything changed. I don't know why, but I think Steve regretted giving me the position. He began speaking to me in unacceptable ways, i.e. swearing, barking orders at me and criticising everything I did, often verging on basically calling me stupid. The training he provided was basically writing code in front of me really fast. I didn't pick much up this way, but could tell he was trying to teach, so felt bad to say anything.



I kept a log of all of this and eventually, after 6 months of it, went to HR. I made a formal complaint about him and submitted details of exactly what he had said to me with times and dates and even a couple of witness' within the team.



HR investigated the case for several weeks, (during which time I had no work, as they said I could not work with Steve during the investigation, so I had nothing to do for 10 weeks, but still getting paid).



The outcome is that HR are doing nothing and that none of my claims can be upheld. Basically, he lied about everything, saying he didn't speak to me like that and shockingly, my colleagues lied for him as well, saying they never heard anything.



So now I'm in a position where I have no work, and he is refusing to accept meeting invites from me now the investigation is over to try and get some work and basically just move forward.



How can I salvage/repair this situation and co-worker relationship?



Before anyone suggests it, yes my line-manager has a manager of his own, unfortunately they are very good friends outside of work, so I've tried that route with no success.







united-kingdom manager software-development






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 23 at 23:54









a CVn

658717




658717










asked Nov 22 at 10:47









Cloud

348127




348127








  • 9




    @Cloud well, in your question you don't mention any attempts of "sorting it out". In fact, your words "I didn't pick much up this way, but could tell he was trying to teach, so felt bad to say anything" explicitly contradict it.
    – IMil
    Nov 23 at 2:17






  • 12




    What country? Employment laws may be relevant.
    – user
    Nov 23 at 9:21






  • 1




    @user OP has indicated on Aviation (specifically in LAPL vs PPL - Which is more suitable?) on Oct 5 '18 that they were in the UK. So this seems very likely to be UK.
    – a CVn
    Nov 23 at 18:14








  • 2




    I think question would benefit from more information on the HR-related thread. On the face value, it seems that the employed HR procedures are very weak. Did HR folk try to find any evidence corroborating your statemnts? It almost reads as: - He said this to me. No, I didn't. OK, that's fine. Not very professional.
    – Konrad
    Nov 26 at 10:59














  • 9




    @Cloud well, in your question you don't mention any attempts of "sorting it out". In fact, your words "I didn't pick much up this way, but could tell he was trying to teach, so felt bad to say anything" explicitly contradict it.
    – IMil
    Nov 23 at 2:17






  • 12




    What country? Employment laws may be relevant.
    – user
    Nov 23 at 9:21






  • 1




    @user OP has indicated on Aviation (specifically in LAPL vs PPL - Which is more suitable?) on Oct 5 '18 that they were in the UK. So this seems very likely to be UK.
    – a CVn
    Nov 23 at 18:14








  • 2




    I think question would benefit from more information on the HR-related thread. On the face value, it seems that the employed HR procedures are very weak. Did HR folk try to find any evidence corroborating your statemnts? It almost reads as: - He said this to me. No, I didn't. OK, that's fine. Not very professional.
    – Konrad
    Nov 26 at 10:59








9




9




@Cloud well, in your question you don't mention any attempts of "sorting it out". In fact, your words "I didn't pick much up this way, but could tell he was trying to teach, so felt bad to say anything" explicitly contradict it.
– IMil
Nov 23 at 2:17




@Cloud well, in your question you don't mention any attempts of "sorting it out". In fact, your words "I didn't pick much up this way, but could tell he was trying to teach, so felt bad to say anything" explicitly contradict it.
– IMil
Nov 23 at 2:17




12




12




What country? Employment laws may be relevant.
– user
Nov 23 at 9:21




What country? Employment laws may be relevant.
– user
Nov 23 at 9:21




1




1




@user OP has indicated on Aviation (specifically in LAPL vs PPL - Which is more suitable?) on Oct 5 '18 that they were in the UK. So this seems very likely to be UK.
– a CVn
Nov 23 at 18:14






@user OP has indicated on Aviation (specifically in LAPL vs PPL - Which is more suitable?) on Oct 5 '18 that they were in the UK. So this seems very likely to be UK.
– a CVn
Nov 23 at 18:14






2




2




I think question would benefit from more information on the HR-related thread. On the face value, it seems that the employed HR procedures are very weak. Did HR folk try to find any evidence corroborating your statemnts? It almost reads as: - He said this to me. No, I didn't. OK, that's fine. Not very professional.
– Konrad
Nov 26 at 10:59




I think question would benefit from more information on the HR-related thread. On the face value, it seems that the employed HR procedures are very weak. Did HR folk try to find any evidence corroborating your statemnts? It almost reads as: - He said this to me. No, I didn't. OK, that's fine. Not very professional.
– Konrad
Nov 26 at 10:59










10 Answers
10






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
64
down vote



accepted










Given the limited information here, my conclusion is that you drew the short stick on an internal power play.



Steve definitely set you up to fail as a senior dev. He promoted you to the position knowing you lack the hard skills necessary to do the job, he did not properly train you, and then he used your lack of skills to motivate his decision to not work with you. I don't know what his motives are, but the way you tell the story, it's pretty clear to me he was harassing you so he would get rid of you.



Your failing lays in not realising you were being set up and not taking action in a timely manner. The second Steve started "training" you and you couldn't understand what he was doing is when you should have told (in writing) your manager or Steve's manager that you are not receiving proper training and you cannot be expected to complete your tasks.
Furthermore, Steve's frustration with you grew as he probably saw you are thick skinned and his insults/harassment aren't working.



Your next mistake is taking things up with HR. HR is not there to protect you from Steve's bullying, but to protect the company's interest. It was HR's conclusion that Steve's work is more important than yours, so their internal investigation came out blank. Not that it matters anyway, you are now flagged as a problem employee. Next time someone has to leave, guess whose turn it will be.



A common way to convince an employee to leave is to take away all his usual tasks and replace them with what basically amounts to worthless junk. We had a case in my country where an employee got relegated to shredding paper so she would leave the company. To me it looks like your employer is trying to get rid of you by not giving you tasks and waiting for you to get bored and leave. Or fire you whenever it suits them because you're not being productive or some made-up reason so you won't sue them for unlawful termination.



So in conclusion, Steve won his little game, you are working in a dysfunctional company which is an unfair employer that only cares about Steve and Steve's gang's happiness and is willing to sideline anyone Steve doesn't like. And Steve HATES you.



Your choices are rather limited.



1: You make it up to Steve. Apparently his happiness matters in the company more than facts. Make Steve happy and you'll be back to your old tasks in no time.



2: Realise you are wasting your time in this company and start looking for a new job.



3: Continue in the current situation and wait to become the equivalent of a human paper shredder. Until they find a good reason to fire you.






share|improve this answer



















  • 64




    I think that the behaviour of manager Steve has definitely contributed to OP's problems. But a lot of the conclusions that assign motivations and beliefs here seem a little hasty without additional information e.g. "Steve definitely set you up to fail as a senior dev." Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity etc . . . perhaps Steve really fancied himself as a wise old teacher, and coped badly when he realised it wasn't working
    – Neil Slater
    Nov 22 at 16:03








  • 9




    "It was HR's conclusion that Steve's work is more important than yours, so their internal investigation came out blank." I think it may be a bit much to claim that without proof. It could be as simple as they did not have evidence to take action against him. Honestly, I can't see HR directly basing a decision off that, especially if OP had it documented well; because then they would be leaving a potentially huge liability. HR probably didn't want to take action against Steve; but I would say that would have been equally influenced by how much evidence OP had.
    – JMac
    Nov 22 at 19:18






  • 22




    Somehow I'm not surprised that OP accepted the answer that basically says OP's only fault was not seeing through evil Management's and hateful Steve's nefarious scheme.
    – kapex
    Nov 23 at 14:41






  • 19




    The whole "HR is not your friend" mantra is way too overused on this website. This answer says "You made the mistake of trying to solve workplace harassment, you should just suck it up or leave". Going to Steve's manager and HR was the right choice. In many companies, it's in their best interest to remove a harasser or at least separate two people who can't get along. This company obviously has problems in that area, and it's better to try and fail so you can make a more informed choice when it comes to "suck it up or leave".
    – Clay07g
    Nov 23 at 23:09








  • 10




    To put it bluntly, this answer encourages workplace harassment. If I was a bully, it would be in my best interest for my victims to suck up to me, leave, or put up with my abuse and make sure the company isn't aware of it.
    – Clay07g
    Nov 23 at 23:12




















up vote
169
down vote













You launched a formal complaint complete with witnesses and documentation which was investigated for 10 weeks while you were paid for doing nothing, and then your complaints were found to be groundless, even your witnesses did not back you up.




Is this co-worker relationship salvageable?




No. You put multiple people into a difficult position. Things will never return to how they were. More constructive to worry about being forced out altogether. You should have spent the 10 weeks job searching, suggest you get onto that asap.






share|improve this answer

















  • 44




    +1. The details of who did what are irrelevant at this point. Chances are Steve could now be refusing meeting invites to set you up for a PIP and then dismissal, and having already gone to HR with one complaint that didn't work out, you're unlikely to be able to fight that internally. Much better to leave on your own accord than be fired.
    – berry120
    Nov 22 at 15:35






  • 5




    Brief advice is the best kind. No point trying to do the impossible, well you can but you still need to search for a new job.
    – goamn
    Nov 22 at 22:25










  • You might try to have a chat with Steve, after you find a new job. make it very clear that you are not trying to blame him for anything, but asking him only about the time before you went to HR and how you could have acted differently, in order that you can do better in future. Put correctly, he might be helpful.
    – Mawg
    Nov 23 at 7:34






  • 4




    @Mawg I am not sure who are you addressing with the comment though "make it very clear that you are not trying to blame him [Steve] for anything" seems false. Submitting a documented case to HR dept is blaming someone for something... with proofs, I don't see how you can say otherwise.
    – luk32
    Nov 23 at 9:52








  • 2




    @Mawg Steve is an enemy now, best for the OP to realise that. Approaching Steve outside the safe work environment could result in a kicking.
    – Kilisi
    Nov 23 at 21:39


















up vote
56
down vote














Then everything changed. I don't know why, but I think Steve regretted
giving me the position.




I'm guessing there's more to this than just a sudden change of attitude. It's unfortunate you didn't talk to Steve to find out why.




How can I salvage/repair this situation and co-worker relationship?



Before anyone suggests it, yes my line-manager has a manager of his
own, unfortunately they are very good friends outside of work, so I've
tried that route with no success.




You could try talking with him and seeing if you can determine why he changed. Perhaps you have something to apologize for here. If so, it would be a good time to do that now. But your relationship may already be beyond the point of repair.



It appears that instead of talking to him directly, you chose to create a 6 month log and then took it to HR as a formal complaint. And apparently, you also went over his head and tried to complain to his boss.



It's not clear why you chose that route first rather than trying to repair the relationship, but what's done is done.



You might need to watch your back now, and start thinking about finding a new job or at least a transfer to work with another manager.






share|improve this answer



















  • 47




    "It's unfortunate you didn't talk to Steve to find out why." This doesn't have enough stress. Going to HR should be a last ditch attempt; first port of call should always be talk to the person directly as they it could even just be venting other issues onto you.
    – UKMonkey
    Nov 22 at 15:01






  • 7




    @UKMonkey Going to HR for interpersonal advice can be sensible depending on where it is and how exactly HR operates. It's the logging of a formal complaint with evidence and witnesses that's always burning bridges.
    – Peter
    Nov 22 at 23:50






  • 5




    OP said in a comment that they did talk to Steve first.
    – Konrad Rudolph
    Nov 23 at 11:21










  • @JoeStrazzere Yes, apparently it was deleted. Annoying.
    – Konrad Rudolph
    Nov 23 at 14:21






  • 1




    @JoeStrazzere Yes, there was a comment to this effect, however it left unclear what exactly the OP tried to communicate. Meanwhile, the question has rather contradictory statement: "I didn't pick much up this way, but could tell he was trying to teach, so felt bad to say anything". And then the OP goes on to say that for several months he or she gathered evidence of Steve's harassment. How and when exactly the OP tried to resolve actual professional issues, if at all, remains mystery.
    – IMil
    Nov 26 at 3:05


















up vote
23
down vote













The other answers suggest you've made a mistake at some point. I tend to disagree: the situation was lost when Steve thought he could teach you to become a senior programmer and then couldn't keep his temper as he found out he couldn't do it.



Being a good programmer



...doesn't automatically mean you have good teaching skills.



I'm a programmer myself. I teach in a hackerspace in my spare time and on a few days a year in a school. Teaching requires time and patience. Also you need a whole different skill-set. Just being able to program won't cut it. If your student is to make big steps, you need to prepare your lessons.



Steve tried to recruit because he needs more people on his team to help do his job. So when he started to teach you instead, it meant he would have even less time to do his 'real' job.



He must have found out that teaching someone else isn't as easy as he hoped and, as his frustration grew, he began to lose his temper.



Don't take it too hard on yourself



It probably isn't even anyone's fault. Take a deep breath. Look around for a new job. Take care it is the kind job you always wanted to do. Take care that your future colleagues are the kind of people you want to work with.






share|improve this answer



















  • 5




    This is actually what I think happened too. Thanks.
    – Cloud
    Nov 23 at 9:50






  • 2




    In my experience, there is no amount of training that will convert a junior dev into a senior. Some people seem to be born as senior devs, and some people drag themselves there through hard experience. But "training" only results in someone knowing how to do more tasks, not having the ability to generalize to other tasks that they weren't trained in. (So I think the mistake was either/both parties thinking training => senior dev.)
    – user3067860
    Nov 23 at 15:39






  • 5




    @user3067860 I don't think anyone's born a senior dev, but seniors become seniors due to varying mixtures of aptitude and experience. Experience can help to improve aptitude, but some people have enough innate aptitude to develop their skills and knowledge more quickly than others, and as such the experience factor is left less important. Someone with less aptitude will require more experience. Someone with barely any aptitude at all is not likely to become a useful senior dev in this century, but given infinite time they could probably manage it.
    – Lightness Races in Orbit
    Nov 23 at 23:12








  • 2




    @Cloud A senior doesn't just know more languages and tools. A senior is more proficient at design, more adept at mentoring, better at communicating, more familiar with politics, more comfortable with customer interactions, more successful at choosing the right tool/architecture/solution for the job, ...... Add a formal project/people management responsibility to a senior and you get a manager, and a manager is far more than someone who knows a bit more C++ than you do.
    – Lightness Races in Orbit
    Nov 26 at 13:09






  • 2




    @Cloud These skills come from experience. That's not to say that you will automatically pick them up after X years of programming, or that there aren't things you can study/consider to aid in your personal development, but it's not something you can do by learning X/Y/Z then away you go. I recommend discussing this topic with your supervisor if it's something you wish to pick up over the course of your career.
    – Lightness Races in Orbit
    Nov 26 at 13:18


















up vote
17
down vote













OP I'm sorry but I think that the "investigation" was basically over in a week. You were given 9 weeks to begin searching for a new job, which you did not take the hint for. I say this because software developers are not a resource that is wasted lightly.



Update your resume and start looking immediately, additionally note how your other coworkers are treating you; you'll need to get references from someone at this company who is not Steve or in the HR hierarchy who have dismissed your claims of harassment.






share|improve this answer



















  • 2




    This might be a good time to switch to contracting, where references are not asked for (in my few decades of experience, but YMMV).
    – Mawg
    Nov 23 at 7:37










  • @Mawg Not a bad idea, but I'm not good enough for that. C# is the only language I could contract with it and I am still a very basic / console app C# dev. I don't know any frameworks even yet...
    – Cloud
    Nov 26 at 13:35










  • Not good enough yet? I felt that way few too – a few decades back :-) Just look around your office – are there any contractors? How do they rate alongside your permanent colleagues? Not much difference, I guess. I have known good and poor contractors, just as I have permanent staff. Don't decide for yourself whether you are good enough – let the interviewer decide (and contractor interviews are easier to get through than perm). If you are really unsure, visit a site like monster.com, find a contract job you think you can handle, call a recruitment agency and ask their opinion of your CV.
    – Mawg
    Nov 26 at 13:58






  • 1




    @Cloud I once saw a contractor hired for $1000 per day. He couldn't even write a Sql script that compiled in one shot. Before we could convince the boss to get rid of him he had made 2x my monthly salary!!! I think if you're competent, you'd go far...
    – C Bauer
    Nov 26 at 14:26


















up vote
9
down vote













Unfortunately you may need to find a new job now, but at least your job title has "senior" in it and you have plenty of time to search. Remember that you only need to put "Senior Software Developer at Company X 20XX-present" on your CV.



You mention that you are logging your boss' behaviour, so keep doing that. In particular your requests for meetings, so that if they try to claim your performance is poor later you can cite the lack of work and repeated requests for it as the reason. At least in Europe they can't fire you when the boss is doing that to you, it would be constructive dismissal.



As to salvaging your current situation, could you ask for an internal transfer? If not, your only real option is to go back to HR and complain about a hostile work environment where you are unable to get any work or progress your career, due to retaliation. That is a serious situation, you could escalate it to a tribunal, so they should deal with it in a way that doesn't disadvantage you.






share|improve this answer




























    up vote
    4
    down vote













    Check the work legislation of your country. In Spain, an employer must provide adequate tasks to their employees. If your employer is not providing you any task, this could be consider as mobbing -which is what they are actually doing, to force you to leave the company. An employee can claim to have work.
    Of course, you are in a bad position. If I were in your situation and this was a small company, I would be thinking about leaving. But if this is a big company, maybe my dream company, then being moved to another department would be ok for me. If you speak with HR and expose this as a case of mobbing, then they may take you more seriously. No company wants to be in the media because of mobbing. On the other hand, if you are thinking about quitting, this can give you a better position to negotiate an exit with a compensation.






    share|improve this answer




























      up vote
      3
      down vote













      Your manager acted petty (or maybe you did not understand the situation completely but let's assume you are right), but your question is unjustified now. If you wanted to salvage the relation, that should have been your first approach rather than going to HR. By going to HR you made an implicit judgment that the relationship was not salvageable in the first place.



      However, even though you could (and should) have picked a better response to your manager's behavior, I don't think it is all only your fault.





      It is unfortunate that your colleagues couched when asked formally by HR. Also, it is unfortunate that your manager's manager preferred taking his friend's side rather than taking the right side.





      Since the relation is not salvageable unless someone has a sudden change of heart and this guy in question is your manager, the best direction is to get a new job.



      It may be bitter tasting but it is the next best thing that can happen to you.






      share|improve this answer




























        up vote
        2
        down vote













        It depends if salvageable means get back to the way it was before you filed the complaint, improve things so they're better than when you filed the complaint, or just salvageable as in you can stick around and not get fired, I'd say they are all possible. Getting to do what it takes to salvage will determine how possible it really is, though.



        If you can find out what Steve's core needs are and find a way to tell him what is core needs are, you will disarm him. This is a core tenet of nonviolent communication. For example, if he has a need for competence and effectiveness more than anything, you could find a way to express you see this as a need of his and it will be very relieving for him to hear. It will create some connection between the two of you. That may be enough to salvage things.



        If you are on your way out, as a lot of other posts advise, I suggest at least trying this. You don't have much to lose and it will be good practice for the next time you are in a conflict. Building the case against him, while done out of the need for peace and equality, in his perspective is the opposite of seeing where he is coming from. If you can see where he is coming from, you have the best chance of salvaging the situation. He may feel threatened by you and not trust you after that happened. If he was merely frustrated he couldn't teach you, now he is probably scared of you. If you succeeded in getting him to change by forcing him to through HR, he still would not like you. You may even be asking the same question you are now, if things can be salvaged after filing complaints against coworkers.



        If you are going to use tactics of pursuing justice from authorities who have powers you don't, it won't truly get him to change. In the Art of War it talks about taking the enemy whole. Had you won with HR, Steve still would have greatly disliked you. This is the equivalent to defeating an enemy and taking their land, but burning all their fields of wheat in the process. Better to take the enemy and their fields of wheat than take the enemy and burn their fields of wheat.



        But for it being salvageable, I'll go with yes, it can be. Just see his needs as a person and empathize/express you see them. That connection is rare in the business world. It may be hard to have the chance at doing that now, though. If you can't get close to him and have the opportunity to do this, maybe it's not worth staying there. I live in a small market, so I can empathize with wanting to salvage things as opposed to just moving on.






        share|improve this answer










        New contributor




        nicklocicero is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.

























          up vote
          -4
          down vote













          You could just do one last thing. Go to a doctor, get a sick leave for a few month because of whatever reason and look for alternatives.






          share|improve this answer











          We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.










          • 3




            without an explanation, this answer may become useless in case if someone else posts an opposite opinion. For example, if someone posts a claim like "Don't go to a doctor, get a sick leave for a few month because of whatever reason and look for alternatives.", how would this answer help reader to pick of two opposing opinions? Consider editing it into a better shape, to meet How to Answer guidelines
            – gnat
            Nov 24 at 9:39










          • How you get sick certificate?
            – dgrat
            Nov 24 at 13:09






          • 1




            This would be good advice in some countries, generally useless in the US. You would put in a mental health claim, because obviously you aren't sick. But that's not great for finding a new job, especially if a prospective employer can call the current one to verify employment and be told that you're out for that reason. Face it, you had 10 weeks to job search normally and you've blown it. Now hurry to get something, anything, because you'll be out at the first pretext.
            – George M
            Nov 25 at 19:30










          protected by Jane S Nov 25 at 6:42



          Thank you for your interest in this question.
          Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



          Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?














          10 Answers
          10






          active

          oldest

          votes








          10 Answers
          10






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          64
          down vote



          accepted










          Given the limited information here, my conclusion is that you drew the short stick on an internal power play.



          Steve definitely set you up to fail as a senior dev. He promoted you to the position knowing you lack the hard skills necessary to do the job, he did not properly train you, and then he used your lack of skills to motivate his decision to not work with you. I don't know what his motives are, but the way you tell the story, it's pretty clear to me he was harassing you so he would get rid of you.



          Your failing lays in not realising you were being set up and not taking action in a timely manner. The second Steve started "training" you and you couldn't understand what he was doing is when you should have told (in writing) your manager or Steve's manager that you are not receiving proper training and you cannot be expected to complete your tasks.
          Furthermore, Steve's frustration with you grew as he probably saw you are thick skinned and his insults/harassment aren't working.



          Your next mistake is taking things up with HR. HR is not there to protect you from Steve's bullying, but to protect the company's interest. It was HR's conclusion that Steve's work is more important than yours, so their internal investigation came out blank. Not that it matters anyway, you are now flagged as a problem employee. Next time someone has to leave, guess whose turn it will be.



          A common way to convince an employee to leave is to take away all his usual tasks and replace them with what basically amounts to worthless junk. We had a case in my country where an employee got relegated to shredding paper so she would leave the company. To me it looks like your employer is trying to get rid of you by not giving you tasks and waiting for you to get bored and leave. Or fire you whenever it suits them because you're not being productive or some made-up reason so you won't sue them for unlawful termination.



          So in conclusion, Steve won his little game, you are working in a dysfunctional company which is an unfair employer that only cares about Steve and Steve's gang's happiness and is willing to sideline anyone Steve doesn't like. And Steve HATES you.



          Your choices are rather limited.



          1: You make it up to Steve. Apparently his happiness matters in the company more than facts. Make Steve happy and you'll be back to your old tasks in no time.



          2: Realise you are wasting your time in this company and start looking for a new job.



          3: Continue in the current situation and wait to become the equivalent of a human paper shredder. Until they find a good reason to fire you.






          share|improve this answer



















          • 64




            I think that the behaviour of manager Steve has definitely contributed to OP's problems. But a lot of the conclusions that assign motivations and beliefs here seem a little hasty without additional information e.g. "Steve definitely set you up to fail as a senior dev." Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity etc . . . perhaps Steve really fancied himself as a wise old teacher, and coped badly when he realised it wasn't working
            – Neil Slater
            Nov 22 at 16:03








          • 9




            "It was HR's conclusion that Steve's work is more important than yours, so their internal investigation came out blank." I think it may be a bit much to claim that without proof. It could be as simple as they did not have evidence to take action against him. Honestly, I can't see HR directly basing a decision off that, especially if OP had it documented well; because then they would be leaving a potentially huge liability. HR probably didn't want to take action against Steve; but I would say that would have been equally influenced by how much evidence OP had.
            – JMac
            Nov 22 at 19:18






          • 22




            Somehow I'm not surprised that OP accepted the answer that basically says OP's only fault was not seeing through evil Management's and hateful Steve's nefarious scheme.
            – kapex
            Nov 23 at 14:41






          • 19




            The whole "HR is not your friend" mantra is way too overused on this website. This answer says "You made the mistake of trying to solve workplace harassment, you should just suck it up or leave". Going to Steve's manager and HR was the right choice. In many companies, it's in their best interest to remove a harasser or at least separate two people who can't get along. This company obviously has problems in that area, and it's better to try and fail so you can make a more informed choice when it comes to "suck it up or leave".
            – Clay07g
            Nov 23 at 23:09








          • 10




            To put it bluntly, this answer encourages workplace harassment. If I was a bully, it would be in my best interest for my victims to suck up to me, leave, or put up with my abuse and make sure the company isn't aware of it.
            – Clay07g
            Nov 23 at 23:12

















          up vote
          64
          down vote



          accepted










          Given the limited information here, my conclusion is that you drew the short stick on an internal power play.



          Steve definitely set you up to fail as a senior dev. He promoted you to the position knowing you lack the hard skills necessary to do the job, he did not properly train you, and then he used your lack of skills to motivate his decision to not work with you. I don't know what his motives are, but the way you tell the story, it's pretty clear to me he was harassing you so he would get rid of you.



          Your failing lays in not realising you were being set up and not taking action in a timely manner. The second Steve started "training" you and you couldn't understand what he was doing is when you should have told (in writing) your manager or Steve's manager that you are not receiving proper training and you cannot be expected to complete your tasks.
          Furthermore, Steve's frustration with you grew as he probably saw you are thick skinned and his insults/harassment aren't working.



          Your next mistake is taking things up with HR. HR is not there to protect you from Steve's bullying, but to protect the company's interest. It was HR's conclusion that Steve's work is more important than yours, so their internal investigation came out blank. Not that it matters anyway, you are now flagged as a problem employee. Next time someone has to leave, guess whose turn it will be.



          A common way to convince an employee to leave is to take away all his usual tasks and replace them with what basically amounts to worthless junk. We had a case in my country where an employee got relegated to shredding paper so she would leave the company. To me it looks like your employer is trying to get rid of you by not giving you tasks and waiting for you to get bored and leave. Or fire you whenever it suits them because you're not being productive or some made-up reason so you won't sue them for unlawful termination.



          So in conclusion, Steve won his little game, you are working in a dysfunctional company which is an unfair employer that only cares about Steve and Steve's gang's happiness and is willing to sideline anyone Steve doesn't like. And Steve HATES you.



          Your choices are rather limited.



          1: You make it up to Steve. Apparently his happiness matters in the company more than facts. Make Steve happy and you'll be back to your old tasks in no time.



          2: Realise you are wasting your time in this company and start looking for a new job.



          3: Continue in the current situation and wait to become the equivalent of a human paper shredder. Until they find a good reason to fire you.






          share|improve this answer



















          • 64




            I think that the behaviour of manager Steve has definitely contributed to OP's problems. But a lot of the conclusions that assign motivations and beliefs here seem a little hasty without additional information e.g. "Steve definitely set you up to fail as a senior dev." Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity etc . . . perhaps Steve really fancied himself as a wise old teacher, and coped badly when he realised it wasn't working
            – Neil Slater
            Nov 22 at 16:03








          • 9




            "It was HR's conclusion that Steve's work is more important than yours, so their internal investigation came out blank." I think it may be a bit much to claim that without proof. It could be as simple as they did not have evidence to take action against him. Honestly, I can't see HR directly basing a decision off that, especially if OP had it documented well; because then they would be leaving a potentially huge liability. HR probably didn't want to take action against Steve; but I would say that would have been equally influenced by how much evidence OP had.
            – JMac
            Nov 22 at 19:18






          • 22




            Somehow I'm not surprised that OP accepted the answer that basically says OP's only fault was not seeing through evil Management's and hateful Steve's nefarious scheme.
            – kapex
            Nov 23 at 14:41






          • 19




            The whole "HR is not your friend" mantra is way too overused on this website. This answer says "You made the mistake of trying to solve workplace harassment, you should just suck it up or leave". Going to Steve's manager and HR was the right choice. In many companies, it's in their best interest to remove a harasser or at least separate two people who can't get along. This company obviously has problems in that area, and it's better to try and fail so you can make a more informed choice when it comes to "suck it up or leave".
            – Clay07g
            Nov 23 at 23:09








          • 10




            To put it bluntly, this answer encourages workplace harassment. If I was a bully, it would be in my best interest for my victims to suck up to me, leave, or put up with my abuse and make sure the company isn't aware of it.
            – Clay07g
            Nov 23 at 23:12















          up vote
          64
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          64
          down vote



          accepted






          Given the limited information here, my conclusion is that you drew the short stick on an internal power play.



          Steve definitely set you up to fail as a senior dev. He promoted you to the position knowing you lack the hard skills necessary to do the job, he did not properly train you, and then he used your lack of skills to motivate his decision to not work with you. I don't know what his motives are, but the way you tell the story, it's pretty clear to me he was harassing you so he would get rid of you.



          Your failing lays in not realising you were being set up and not taking action in a timely manner. The second Steve started "training" you and you couldn't understand what he was doing is when you should have told (in writing) your manager or Steve's manager that you are not receiving proper training and you cannot be expected to complete your tasks.
          Furthermore, Steve's frustration with you grew as he probably saw you are thick skinned and his insults/harassment aren't working.



          Your next mistake is taking things up with HR. HR is not there to protect you from Steve's bullying, but to protect the company's interest. It was HR's conclusion that Steve's work is more important than yours, so their internal investigation came out blank. Not that it matters anyway, you are now flagged as a problem employee. Next time someone has to leave, guess whose turn it will be.



          A common way to convince an employee to leave is to take away all his usual tasks and replace them with what basically amounts to worthless junk. We had a case in my country where an employee got relegated to shredding paper so she would leave the company. To me it looks like your employer is trying to get rid of you by not giving you tasks and waiting for you to get bored and leave. Or fire you whenever it suits them because you're not being productive or some made-up reason so you won't sue them for unlawful termination.



          So in conclusion, Steve won his little game, you are working in a dysfunctional company which is an unfair employer that only cares about Steve and Steve's gang's happiness and is willing to sideline anyone Steve doesn't like. And Steve HATES you.



          Your choices are rather limited.



          1: You make it up to Steve. Apparently his happiness matters in the company more than facts. Make Steve happy and you'll be back to your old tasks in no time.



          2: Realise you are wasting your time in this company and start looking for a new job.



          3: Continue in the current situation and wait to become the equivalent of a human paper shredder. Until they find a good reason to fire you.






          share|improve this answer














          Given the limited information here, my conclusion is that you drew the short stick on an internal power play.



          Steve definitely set you up to fail as a senior dev. He promoted you to the position knowing you lack the hard skills necessary to do the job, he did not properly train you, and then he used your lack of skills to motivate his decision to not work with you. I don't know what his motives are, but the way you tell the story, it's pretty clear to me he was harassing you so he would get rid of you.



          Your failing lays in not realising you were being set up and not taking action in a timely manner. The second Steve started "training" you and you couldn't understand what he was doing is when you should have told (in writing) your manager or Steve's manager that you are not receiving proper training and you cannot be expected to complete your tasks.
          Furthermore, Steve's frustration with you grew as he probably saw you are thick skinned and his insults/harassment aren't working.



          Your next mistake is taking things up with HR. HR is not there to protect you from Steve's bullying, but to protect the company's interest. It was HR's conclusion that Steve's work is more important than yours, so their internal investigation came out blank. Not that it matters anyway, you are now flagged as a problem employee. Next time someone has to leave, guess whose turn it will be.



          A common way to convince an employee to leave is to take away all his usual tasks and replace them with what basically amounts to worthless junk. We had a case in my country where an employee got relegated to shredding paper so she would leave the company. To me it looks like your employer is trying to get rid of you by not giving you tasks and waiting for you to get bored and leave. Or fire you whenever it suits them because you're not being productive or some made-up reason so you won't sue them for unlawful termination.



          So in conclusion, Steve won his little game, you are working in a dysfunctional company which is an unfair employer that only cares about Steve and Steve's gang's happiness and is willing to sideline anyone Steve doesn't like. And Steve HATES you.



          Your choices are rather limited.



          1: You make it up to Steve. Apparently his happiness matters in the company more than facts. Make Steve happy and you'll be back to your old tasks in no time.



          2: Realise you are wasting your time in this company and start looking for a new job.



          3: Continue in the current situation and wait to become the equivalent of a human paper shredder. Until they find a good reason to fire you.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Nov 22 at 23:06









          Kat

          2,72321118




          2,72321118










          answered Nov 22 at 13:00









          BoboDarph

          2,6591516




          2,6591516








          • 64




            I think that the behaviour of manager Steve has definitely contributed to OP's problems. But a lot of the conclusions that assign motivations and beliefs here seem a little hasty without additional information e.g. "Steve definitely set you up to fail as a senior dev." Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity etc . . . perhaps Steve really fancied himself as a wise old teacher, and coped badly when he realised it wasn't working
            – Neil Slater
            Nov 22 at 16:03








          • 9




            "It was HR's conclusion that Steve's work is more important than yours, so their internal investigation came out blank." I think it may be a bit much to claim that without proof. It could be as simple as they did not have evidence to take action against him. Honestly, I can't see HR directly basing a decision off that, especially if OP had it documented well; because then they would be leaving a potentially huge liability. HR probably didn't want to take action against Steve; but I would say that would have been equally influenced by how much evidence OP had.
            – JMac
            Nov 22 at 19:18






          • 22




            Somehow I'm not surprised that OP accepted the answer that basically says OP's only fault was not seeing through evil Management's and hateful Steve's nefarious scheme.
            – kapex
            Nov 23 at 14:41






          • 19




            The whole "HR is not your friend" mantra is way too overused on this website. This answer says "You made the mistake of trying to solve workplace harassment, you should just suck it up or leave". Going to Steve's manager and HR was the right choice. In many companies, it's in their best interest to remove a harasser or at least separate two people who can't get along. This company obviously has problems in that area, and it's better to try and fail so you can make a more informed choice when it comes to "suck it up or leave".
            – Clay07g
            Nov 23 at 23:09








          • 10




            To put it bluntly, this answer encourages workplace harassment. If I was a bully, it would be in my best interest for my victims to suck up to me, leave, or put up with my abuse and make sure the company isn't aware of it.
            – Clay07g
            Nov 23 at 23:12
















          • 64




            I think that the behaviour of manager Steve has definitely contributed to OP's problems. But a lot of the conclusions that assign motivations and beliefs here seem a little hasty without additional information e.g. "Steve definitely set you up to fail as a senior dev." Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity etc . . . perhaps Steve really fancied himself as a wise old teacher, and coped badly when he realised it wasn't working
            – Neil Slater
            Nov 22 at 16:03








          • 9




            "It was HR's conclusion that Steve's work is more important than yours, so their internal investigation came out blank." I think it may be a bit much to claim that without proof. It could be as simple as they did not have evidence to take action against him. Honestly, I can't see HR directly basing a decision off that, especially if OP had it documented well; because then they would be leaving a potentially huge liability. HR probably didn't want to take action against Steve; but I would say that would have been equally influenced by how much evidence OP had.
            – JMac
            Nov 22 at 19:18






          • 22




            Somehow I'm not surprised that OP accepted the answer that basically says OP's only fault was not seeing through evil Management's and hateful Steve's nefarious scheme.
            – kapex
            Nov 23 at 14:41






          • 19




            The whole "HR is not your friend" mantra is way too overused on this website. This answer says "You made the mistake of trying to solve workplace harassment, you should just suck it up or leave". Going to Steve's manager and HR was the right choice. In many companies, it's in their best interest to remove a harasser or at least separate two people who can't get along. This company obviously has problems in that area, and it's better to try and fail so you can make a more informed choice when it comes to "suck it up or leave".
            – Clay07g
            Nov 23 at 23:09








          • 10




            To put it bluntly, this answer encourages workplace harassment. If I was a bully, it would be in my best interest for my victims to suck up to me, leave, or put up with my abuse and make sure the company isn't aware of it.
            – Clay07g
            Nov 23 at 23:12










          64




          64




          I think that the behaviour of manager Steve has definitely contributed to OP's problems. But a lot of the conclusions that assign motivations and beliefs here seem a little hasty without additional information e.g. "Steve definitely set you up to fail as a senior dev." Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity etc . . . perhaps Steve really fancied himself as a wise old teacher, and coped badly when he realised it wasn't working
          – Neil Slater
          Nov 22 at 16:03






          I think that the behaviour of manager Steve has definitely contributed to OP's problems. But a lot of the conclusions that assign motivations and beliefs here seem a little hasty without additional information e.g. "Steve definitely set you up to fail as a senior dev." Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity etc . . . perhaps Steve really fancied himself as a wise old teacher, and coped badly when he realised it wasn't working
          – Neil Slater
          Nov 22 at 16:03






          9




          9




          "It was HR's conclusion that Steve's work is more important than yours, so their internal investigation came out blank." I think it may be a bit much to claim that without proof. It could be as simple as they did not have evidence to take action against him. Honestly, I can't see HR directly basing a decision off that, especially if OP had it documented well; because then they would be leaving a potentially huge liability. HR probably didn't want to take action against Steve; but I would say that would have been equally influenced by how much evidence OP had.
          – JMac
          Nov 22 at 19:18




          "It was HR's conclusion that Steve's work is more important than yours, so their internal investigation came out blank." I think it may be a bit much to claim that without proof. It could be as simple as they did not have evidence to take action against him. Honestly, I can't see HR directly basing a decision off that, especially if OP had it documented well; because then they would be leaving a potentially huge liability. HR probably didn't want to take action against Steve; but I would say that would have been equally influenced by how much evidence OP had.
          – JMac
          Nov 22 at 19:18




          22




          22




          Somehow I'm not surprised that OP accepted the answer that basically says OP's only fault was not seeing through evil Management's and hateful Steve's nefarious scheme.
          – kapex
          Nov 23 at 14:41




          Somehow I'm not surprised that OP accepted the answer that basically says OP's only fault was not seeing through evil Management's and hateful Steve's nefarious scheme.
          – kapex
          Nov 23 at 14:41




          19




          19




          The whole "HR is not your friend" mantra is way too overused on this website. This answer says "You made the mistake of trying to solve workplace harassment, you should just suck it up or leave". Going to Steve's manager and HR was the right choice. In many companies, it's in their best interest to remove a harasser or at least separate two people who can't get along. This company obviously has problems in that area, and it's better to try and fail so you can make a more informed choice when it comes to "suck it up or leave".
          – Clay07g
          Nov 23 at 23:09






          The whole "HR is not your friend" mantra is way too overused on this website. This answer says "You made the mistake of trying to solve workplace harassment, you should just suck it up or leave". Going to Steve's manager and HR was the right choice. In many companies, it's in their best interest to remove a harasser or at least separate two people who can't get along. This company obviously has problems in that area, and it's better to try and fail so you can make a more informed choice when it comes to "suck it up or leave".
          – Clay07g
          Nov 23 at 23:09






          10




          10




          To put it bluntly, this answer encourages workplace harassment. If I was a bully, it would be in my best interest for my victims to suck up to me, leave, or put up with my abuse and make sure the company isn't aware of it.
          – Clay07g
          Nov 23 at 23:12






          To put it bluntly, this answer encourages workplace harassment. If I was a bully, it would be in my best interest for my victims to suck up to me, leave, or put up with my abuse and make sure the company isn't aware of it.
          – Clay07g
          Nov 23 at 23:12














          up vote
          169
          down vote













          You launched a formal complaint complete with witnesses and documentation which was investigated for 10 weeks while you were paid for doing nothing, and then your complaints were found to be groundless, even your witnesses did not back you up.




          Is this co-worker relationship salvageable?




          No. You put multiple people into a difficult position. Things will never return to how they were. More constructive to worry about being forced out altogether. You should have spent the 10 weeks job searching, suggest you get onto that asap.






          share|improve this answer

















          • 44




            +1. The details of who did what are irrelevant at this point. Chances are Steve could now be refusing meeting invites to set you up for a PIP and then dismissal, and having already gone to HR with one complaint that didn't work out, you're unlikely to be able to fight that internally. Much better to leave on your own accord than be fired.
            – berry120
            Nov 22 at 15:35






          • 5




            Brief advice is the best kind. No point trying to do the impossible, well you can but you still need to search for a new job.
            – goamn
            Nov 22 at 22:25










          • You might try to have a chat with Steve, after you find a new job. make it very clear that you are not trying to blame him for anything, but asking him only about the time before you went to HR and how you could have acted differently, in order that you can do better in future. Put correctly, he might be helpful.
            – Mawg
            Nov 23 at 7:34






          • 4




            @Mawg I am not sure who are you addressing with the comment though "make it very clear that you are not trying to blame him [Steve] for anything" seems false. Submitting a documented case to HR dept is blaming someone for something... with proofs, I don't see how you can say otherwise.
            – luk32
            Nov 23 at 9:52








          • 2




            @Mawg Steve is an enemy now, best for the OP to realise that. Approaching Steve outside the safe work environment could result in a kicking.
            – Kilisi
            Nov 23 at 21:39















          up vote
          169
          down vote













          You launched a formal complaint complete with witnesses and documentation which was investigated for 10 weeks while you were paid for doing nothing, and then your complaints were found to be groundless, even your witnesses did not back you up.




          Is this co-worker relationship salvageable?




          No. You put multiple people into a difficult position. Things will never return to how they were. More constructive to worry about being forced out altogether. You should have spent the 10 weeks job searching, suggest you get onto that asap.






          share|improve this answer

















          • 44




            +1. The details of who did what are irrelevant at this point. Chances are Steve could now be refusing meeting invites to set you up for a PIP and then dismissal, and having already gone to HR with one complaint that didn't work out, you're unlikely to be able to fight that internally. Much better to leave on your own accord than be fired.
            – berry120
            Nov 22 at 15:35






          • 5




            Brief advice is the best kind. No point trying to do the impossible, well you can but you still need to search for a new job.
            – goamn
            Nov 22 at 22:25










          • You might try to have a chat with Steve, after you find a new job. make it very clear that you are not trying to blame him for anything, but asking him only about the time before you went to HR and how you could have acted differently, in order that you can do better in future. Put correctly, he might be helpful.
            – Mawg
            Nov 23 at 7:34






          • 4




            @Mawg I am not sure who are you addressing with the comment though "make it very clear that you are not trying to blame him [Steve] for anything" seems false. Submitting a documented case to HR dept is blaming someone for something... with proofs, I don't see how you can say otherwise.
            – luk32
            Nov 23 at 9:52








          • 2




            @Mawg Steve is an enemy now, best for the OP to realise that. Approaching Steve outside the safe work environment could result in a kicking.
            – Kilisi
            Nov 23 at 21:39













          up vote
          169
          down vote










          up vote
          169
          down vote









          You launched a formal complaint complete with witnesses and documentation which was investigated for 10 weeks while you were paid for doing nothing, and then your complaints were found to be groundless, even your witnesses did not back you up.




          Is this co-worker relationship salvageable?




          No. You put multiple people into a difficult position. Things will never return to how they were. More constructive to worry about being forced out altogether. You should have spent the 10 weeks job searching, suggest you get onto that asap.






          share|improve this answer












          You launched a formal complaint complete with witnesses and documentation which was investigated for 10 weeks while you were paid for doing nothing, and then your complaints were found to be groundless, even your witnesses did not back you up.




          Is this co-worker relationship salvageable?




          No. You put multiple people into a difficult position. Things will never return to how they were. More constructive to worry about being forced out altogether. You should have spent the 10 weeks job searching, suggest you get onto that asap.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Nov 22 at 11:31









          Kilisi

          109k61243422




          109k61243422








          • 44




            +1. The details of who did what are irrelevant at this point. Chances are Steve could now be refusing meeting invites to set you up for a PIP and then dismissal, and having already gone to HR with one complaint that didn't work out, you're unlikely to be able to fight that internally. Much better to leave on your own accord than be fired.
            – berry120
            Nov 22 at 15:35






          • 5




            Brief advice is the best kind. No point trying to do the impossible, well you can but you still need to search for a new job.
            – goamn
            Nov 22 at 22:25










          • You might try to have a chat with Steve, after you find a new job. make it very clear that you are not trying to blame him for anything, but asking him only about the time before you went to HR and how you could have acted differently, in order that you can do better in future. Put correctly, he might be helpful.
            – Mawg
            Nov 23 at 7:34






          • 4




            @Mawg I am not sure who are you addressing with the comment though "make it very clear that you are not trying to blame him [Steve] for anything" seems false. Submitting a documented case to HR dept is blaming someone for something... with proofs, I don't see how you can say otherwise.
            – luk32
            Nov 23 at 9:52








          • 2




            @Mawg Steve is an enemy now, best for the OP to realise that. Approaching Steve outside the safe work environment could result in a kicking.
            – Kilisi
            Nov 23 at 21:39














          • 44




            +1. The details of who did what are irrelevant at this point. Chances are Steve could now be refusing meeting invites to set you up for a PIP and then dismissal, and having already gone to HR with one complaint that didn't work out, you're unlikely to be able to fight that internally. Much better to leave on your own accord than be fired.
            – berry120
            Nov 22 at 15:35






          • 5




            Brief advice is the best kind. No point trying to do the impossible, well you can but you still need to search for a new job.
            – goamn
            Nov 22 at 22:25










          • You might try to have a chat with Steve, after you find a new job. make it very clear that you are not trying to blame him for anything, but asking him only about the time before you went to HR and how you could have acted differently, in order that you can do better in future. Put correctly, he might be helpful.
            – Mawg
            Nov 23 at 7:34






          • 4




            @Mawg I am not sure who are you addressing with the comment though "make it very clear that you are not trying to blame him [Steve] for anything" seems false. Submitting a documented case to HR dept is blaming someone for something... with proofs, I don't see how you can say otherwise.
            – luk32
            Nov 23 at 9:52








          • 2




            @Mawg Steve is an enemy now, best for the OP to realise that. Approaching Steve outside the safe work environment could result in a kicking.
            – Kilisi
            Nov 23 at 21:39








          44




          44




          +1. The details of who did what are irrelevant at this point. Chances are Steve could now be refusing meeting invites to set you up for a PIP and then dismissal, and having already gone to HR with one complaint that didn't work out, you're unlikely to be able to fight that internally. Much better to leave on your own accord than be fired.
          – berry120
          Nov 22 at 15:35




          +1. The details of who did what are irrelevant at this point. Chances are Steve could now be refusing meeting invites to set you up for a PIP and then dismissal, and having already gone to HR with one complaint that didn't work out, you're unlikely to be able to fight that internally. Much better to leave on your own accord than be fired.
          – berry120
          Nov 22 at 15:35




          5




          5




          Brief advice is the best kind. No point trying to do the impossible, well you can but you still need to search for a new job.
          – goamn
          Nov 22 at 22:25




          Brief advice is the best kind. No point trying to do the impossible, well you can but you still need to search for a new job.
          – goamn
          Nov 22 at 22:25












          You might try to have a chat with Steve, after you find a new job. make it very clear that you are not trying to blame him for anything, but asking him only about the time before you went to HR and how you could have acted differently, in order that you can do better in future. Put correctly, he might be helpful.
          – Mawg
          Nov 23 at 7:34




          You might try to have a chat with Steve, after you find a new job. make it very clear that you are not trying to blame him for anything, but asking him only about the time before you went to HR and how you could have acted differently, in order that you can do better in future. Put correctly, he might be helpful.
          – Mawg
          Nov 23 at 7:34




          4




          4




          @Mawg I am not sure who are you addressing with the comment though "make it very clear that you are not trying to blame him [Steve] for anything" seems false. Submitting a documented case to HR dept is blaming someone for something... with proofs, I don't see how you can say otherwise.
          – luk32
          Nov 23 at 9:52






          @Mawg I am not sure who are you addressing with the comment though "make it very clear that you are not trying to blame him [Steve] for anything" seems false. Submitting a documented case to HR dept is blaming someone for something... with proofs, I don't see how you can say otherwise.
          – luk32
          Nov 23 at 9:52






          2




          2




          @Mawg Steve is an enemy now, best for the OP to realise that. Approaching Steve outside the safe work environment could result in a kicking.
          – Kilisi
          Nov 23 at 21:39




          @Mawg Steve is an enemy now, best for the OP to realise that. Approaching Steve outside the safe work environment could result in a kicking.
          – Kilisi
          Nov 23 at 21:39










          up vote
          56
          down vote














          Then everything changed. I don't know why, but I think Steve regretted
          giving me the position.




          I'm guessing there's more to this than just a sudden change of attitude. It's unfortunate you didn't talk to Steve to find out why.




          How can I salvage/repair this situation and co-worker relationship?



          Before anyone suggests it, yes my line-manager has a manager of his
          own, unfortunately they are very good friends outside of work, so I've
          tried that route with no success.




          You could try talking with him and seeing if you can determine why he changed. Perhaps you have something to apologize for here. If so, it would be a good time to do that now. But your relationship may already be beyond the point of repair.



          It appears that instead of talking to him directly, you chose to create a 6 month log and then took it to HR as a formal complaint. And apparently, you also went over his head and tried to complain to his boss.



          It's not clear why you chose that route first rather than trying to repair the relationship, but what's done is done.



          You might need to watch your back now, and start thinking about finding a new job or at least a transfer to work with another manager.






          share|improve this answer



















          • 47




            "It's unfortunate you didn't talk to Steve to find out why." This doesn't have enough stress. Going to HR should be a last ditch attempt; first port of call should always be talk to the person directly as they it could even just be venting other issues onto you.
            – UKMonkey
            Nov 22 at 15:01






          • 7




            @UKMonkey Going to HR for interpersonal advice can be sensible depending on where it is and how exactly HR operates. It's the logging of a formal complaint with evidence and witnesses that's always burning bridges.
            – Peter
            Nov 22 at 23:50






          • 5




            OP said in a comment that they did talk to Steve first.
            – Konrad Rudolph
            Nov 23 at 11:21










          • @JoeStrazzere Yes, apparently it was deleted. Annoying.
            – Konrad Rudolph
            Nov 23 at 14:21






          • 1




            @JoeStrazzere Yes, there was a comment to this effect, however it left unclear what exactly the OP tried to communicate. Meanwhile, the question has rather contradictory statement: "I didn't pick much up this way, but could tell he was trying to teach, so felt bad to say anything". And then the OP goes on to say that for several months he or she gathered evidence of Steve's harassment. How and when exactly the OP tried to resolve actual professional issues, if at all, remains mystery.
            – IMil
            Nov 26 at 3:05















          up vote
          56
          down vote














          Then everything changed. I don't know why, but I think Steve regretted
          giving me the position.




          I'm guessing there's more to this than just a sudden change of attitude. It's unfortunate you didn't talk to Steve to find out why.




          How can I salvage/repair this situation and co-worker relationship?



          Before anyone suggests it, yes my line-manager has a manager of his
          own, unfortunately they are very good friends outside of work, so I've
          tried that route with no success.




          You could try talking with him and seeing if you can determine why he changed. Perhaps you have something to apologize for here. If so, it would be a good time to do that now. But your relationship may already be beyond the point of repair.



          It appears that instead of talking to him directly, you chose to create a 6 month log and then took it to HR as a formal complaint. And apparently, you also went over his head and tried to complain to his boss.



          It's not clear why you chose that route first rather than trying to repair the relationship, but what's done is done.



          You might need to watch your back now, and start thinking about finding a new job or at least a transfer to work with another manager.






          share|improve this answer



















          • 47




            "It's unfortunate you didn't talk to Steve to find out why." This doesn't have enough stress. Going to HR should be a last ditch attempt; first port of call should always be talk to the person directly as they it could even just be venting other issues onto you.
            – UKMonkey
            Nov 22 at 15:01






          • 7




            @UKMonkey Going to HR for interpersonal advice can be sensible depending on where it is and how exactly HR operates. It's the logging of a formal complaint with evidence and witnesses that's always burning bridges.
            – Peter
            Nov 22 at 23:50






          • 5




            OP said in a comment that they did talk to Steve first.
            – Konrad Rudolph
            Nov 23 at 11:21










          • @JoeStrazzere Yes, apparently it was deleted. Annoying.
            – Konrad Rudolph
            Nov 23 at 14:21






          • 1




            @JoeStrazzere Yes, there was a comment to this effect, however it left unclear what exactly the OP tried to communicate. Meanwhile, the question has rather contradictory statement: "I didn't pick much up this way, but could tell he was trying to teach, so felt bad to say anything". And then the OP goes on to say that for several months he or she gathered evidence of Steve's harassment. How and when exactly the OP tried to resolve actual professional issues, if at all, remains mystery.
            – IMil
            Nov 26 at 3:05













          up vote
          56
          down vote










          up vote
          56
          down vote










          Then everything changed. I don't know why, but I think Steve regretted
          giving me the position.




          I'm guessing there's more to this than just a sudden change of attitude. It's unfortunate you didn't talk to Steve to find out why.




          How can I salvage/repair this situation and co-worker relationship?



          Before anyone suggests it, yes my line-manager has a manager of his
          own, unfortunately they are very good friends outside of work, so I've
          tried that route with no success.




          You could try talking with him and seeing if you can determine why he changed. Perhaps you have something to apologize for here. If so, it would be a good time to do that now. But your relationship may already be beyond the point of repair.



          It appears that instead of talking to him directly, you chose to create a 6 month log and then took it to HR as a formal complaint. And apparently, you also went over his head and tried to complain to his boss.



          It's not clear why you chose that route first rather than trying to repair the relationship, but what's done is done.



          You might need to watch your back now, and start thinking about finding a new job or at least a transfer to work with another manager.






          share|improve this answer















          Then everything changed. I don't know why, but I think Steve regretted
          giving me the position.




          I'm guessing there's more to this than just a sudden change of attitude. It's unfortunate you didn't talk to Steve to find out why.




          How can I salvage/repair this situation and co-worker relationship?



          Before anyone suggests it, yes my line-manager has a manager of his
          own, unfortunately they are very good friends outside of work, so I've
          tried that route with no success.




          You could try talking with him and seeing if you can determine why he changed. Perhaps you have something to apologize for here. If so, it would be a good time to do that now. But your relationship may already be beyond the point of repair.



          It appears that instead of talking to him directly, you chose to create a 6 month log and then took it to HR as a formal complaint. And apparently, you also went over his head and tried to complain to his boss.



          It's not clear why you chose that route first rather than trying to repair the relationship, but what's done is done.



          You might need to watch your back now, and start thinking about finding a new job or at least a transfer to work with another manager.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Nov 22 at 12:20

























          answered Nov 22 at 12:15









          Joe Strazzere

          238k115695991




          238k115695991








          • 47




            "It's unfortunate you didn't talk to Steve to find out why." This doesn't have enough stress. Going to HR should be a last ditch attempt; first port of call should always be talk to the person directly as they it could even just be venting other issues onto you.
            – UKMonkey
            Nov 22 at 15:01






          • 7




            @UKMonkey Going to HR for interpersonal advice can be sensible depending on where it is and how exactly HR operates. It's the logging of a formal complaint with evidence and witnesses that's always burning bridges.
            – Peter
            Nov 22 at 23:50






          • 5




            OP said in a comment that they did talk to Steve first.
            – Konrad Rudolph
            Nov 23 at 11:21










          • @JoeStrazzere Yes, apparently it was deleted. Annoying.
            – Konrad Rudolph
            Nov 23 at 14:21






          • 1




            @JoeStrazzere Yes, there was a comment to this effect, however it left unclear what exactly the OP tried to communicate. Meanwhile, the question has rather contradictory statement: "I didn't pick much up this way, but could tell he was trying to teach, so felt bad to say anything". And then the OP goes on to say that for several months he or she gathered evidence of Steve's harassment. How and when exactly the OP tried to resolve actual professional issues, if at all, remains mystery.
            – IMil
            Nov 26 at 3:05














          • 47




            "It's unfortunate you didn't talk to Steve to find out why." This doesn't have enough stress. Going to HR should be a last ditch attempt; first port of call should always be talk to the person directly as they it could even just be venting other issues onto you.
            – UKMonkey
            Nov 22 at 15:01






          • 7




            @UKMonkey Going to HR for interpersonal advice can be sensible depending on where it is and how exactly HR operates. It's the logging of a formal complaint with evidence and witnesses that's always burning bridges.
            – Peter
            Nov 22 at 23:50






          • 5




            OP said in a comment that they did talk to Steve first.
            – Konrad Rudolph
            Nov 23 at 11:21










          • @JoeStrazzere Yes, apparently it was deleted. Annoying.
            – Konrad Rudolph
            Nov 23 at 14:21






          • 1




            @JoeStrazzere Yes, there was a comment to this effect, however it left unclear what exactly the OP tried to communicate. Meanwhile, the question has rather contradictory statement: "I didn't pick much up this way, but could tell he was trying to teach, so felt bad to say anything". And then the OP goes on to say that for several months he or she gathered evidence of Steve's harassment. How and when exactly the OP tried to resolve actual professional issues, if at all, remains mystery.
            – IMil
            Nov 26 at 3:05








          47




          47




          "It's unfortunate you didn't talk to Steve to find out why." This doesn't have enough stress. Going to HR should be a last ditch attempt; first port of call should always be talk to the person directly as they it could even just be venting other issues onto you.
          – UKMonkey
          Nov 22 at 15:01




          "It's unfortunate you didn't talk to Steve to find out why." This doesn't have enough stress. Going to HR should be a last ditch attempt; first port of call should always be talk to the person directly as they it could even just be venting other issues onto you.
          – UKMonkey
          Nov 22 at 15:01




          7




          7




          @UKMonkey Going to HR for interpersonal advice can be sensible depending on where it is and how exactly HR operates. It's the logging of a formal complaint with evidence and witnesses that's always burning bridges.
          – Peter
          Nov 22 at 23:50




          @UKMonkey Going to HR for interpersonal advice can be sensible depending on where it is and how exactly HR operates. It's the logging of a formal complaint with evidence and witnesses that's always burning bridges.
          – Peter
          Nov 22 at 23:50




          5




          5




          OP said in a comment that they did talk to Steve first.
          – Konrad Rudolph
          Nov 23 at 11:21




          OP said in a comment that they did talk to Steve first.
          – Konrad Rudolph
          Nov 23 at 11:21












          @JoeStrazzere Yes, apparently it was deleted. Annoying.
          – Konrad Rudolph
          Nov 23 at 14:21




          @JoeStrazzere Yes, apparently it was deleted. Annoying.
          – Konrad Rudolph
          Nov 23 at 14:21




          1




          1




          @JoeStrazzere Yes, there was a comment to this effect, however it left unclear what exactly the OP tried to communicate. Meanwhile, the question has rather contradictory statement: "I didn't pick much up this way, but could tell he was trying to teach, so felt bad to say anything". And then the OP goes on to say that for several months he or she gathered evidence of Steve's harassment. How and when exactly the OP tried to resolve actual professional issues, if at all, remains mystery.
          – IMil
          Nov 26 at 3:05




          @JoeStrazzere Yes, there was a comment to this effect, however it left unclear what exactly the OP tried to communicate. Meanwhile, the question has rather contradictory statement: "I didn't pick much up this way, but could tell he was trying to teach, so felt bad to say anything". And then the OP goes on to say that for several months he or she gathered evidence of Steve's harassment. How and when exactly the OP tried to resolve actual professional issues, if at all, remains mystery.
          – IMil
          Nov 26 at 3:05










          up vote
          23
          down vote













          The other answers suggest you've made a mistake at some point. I tend to disagree: the situation was lost when Steve thought he could teach you to become a senior programmer and then couldn't keep his temper as he found out he couldn't do it.



          Being a good programmer



          ...doesn't automatically mean you have good teaching skills.



          I'm a programmer myself. I teach in a hackerspace in my spare time and on a few days a year in a school. Teaching requires time and patience. Also you need a whole different skill-set. Just being able to program won't cut it. If your student is to make big steps, you need to prepare your lessons.



          Steve tried to recruit because he needs more people on his team to help do his job. So when he started to teach you instead, it meant he would have even less time to do his 'real' job.



          He must have found out that teaching someone else isn't as easy as he hoped and, as his frustration grew, he began to lose his temper.



          Don't take it too hard on yourself



          It probably isn't even anyone's fault. Take a deep breath. Look around for a new job. Take care it is the kind job you always wanted to do. Take care that your future colleagues are the kind of people you want to work with.






          share|improve this answer



















          • 5




            This is actually what I think happened too. Thanks.
            – Cloud
            Nov 23 at 9:50






          • 2




            In my experience, there is no amount of training that will convert a junior dev into a senior. Some people seem to be born as senior devs, and some people drag themselves there through hard experience. But "training" only results in someone knowing how to do more tasks, not having the ability to generalize to other tasks that they weren't trained in. (So I think the mistake was either/both parties thinking training => senior dev.)
            – user3067860
            Nov 23 at 15:39






          • 5




            @user3067860 I don't think anyone's born a senior dev, but seniors become seniors due to varying mixtures of aptitude and experience. Experience can help to improve aptitude, but some people have enough innate aptitude to develop their skills and knowledge more quickly than others, and as such the experience factor is left less important. Someone with less aptitude will require more experience. Someone with barely any aptitude at all is not likely to become a useful senior dev in this century, but given infinite time they could probably manage it.
            – Lightness Races in Orbit
            Nov 23 at 23:12








          • 2




            @Cloud A senior doesn't just know more languages and tools. A senior is more proficient at design, more adept at mentoring, better at communicating, more familiar with politics, more comfortable with customer interactions, more successful at choosing the right tool/architecture/solution for the job, ...... Add a formal project/people management responsibility to a senior and you get a manager, and a manager is far more than someone who knows a bit more C++ than you do.
            – Lightness Races in Orbit
            Nov 26 at 13:09






          • 2




            @Cloud These skills come from experience. That's not to say that you will automatically pick them up after X years of programming, or that there aren't things you can study/consider to aid in your personal development, but it's not something you can do by learning X/Y/Z then away you go. I recommend discussing this topic with your supervisor if it's something you wish to pick up over the course of your career.
            – Lightness Races in Orbit
            Nov 26 at 13:18















          up vote
          23
          down vote













          The other answers suggest you've made a mistake at some point. I tend to disagree: the situation was lost when Steve thought he could teach you to become a senior programmer and then couldn't keep his temper as he found out he couldn't do it.



          Being a good programmer



          ...doesn't automatically mean you have good teaching skills.



          I'm a programmer myself. I teach in a hackerspace in my spare time and on a few days a year in a school. Teaching requires time and patience. Also you need a whole different skill-set. Just being able to program won't cut it. If your student is to make big steps, you need to prepare your lessons.



          Steve tried to recruit because he needs more people on his team to help do his job. So when he started to teach you instead, it meant he would have even less time to do his 'real' job.



          He must have found out that teaching someone else isn't as easy as he hoped and, as his frustration grew, he began to lose his temper.



          Don't take it too hard on yourself



          It probably isn't even anyone's fault. Take a deep breath. Look around for a new job. Take care it is the kind job you always wanted to do. Take care that your future colleagues are the kind of people you want to work with.






          share|improve this answer



















          • 5




            This is actually what I think happened too. Thanks.
            – Cloud
            Nov 23 at 9:50






          • 2




            In my experience, there is no amount of training that will convert a junior dev into a senior. Some people seem to be born as senior devs, and some people drag themselves there through hard experience. But "training" only results in someone knowing how to do more tasks, not having the ability to generalize to other tasks that they weren't trained in. (So I think the mistake was either/both parties thinking training => senior dev.)
            – user3067860
            Nov 23 at 15:39






          • 5




            @user3067860 I don't think anyone's born a senior dev, but seniors become seniors due to varying mixtures of aptitude and experience. Experience can help to improve aptitude, but some people have enough innate aptitude to develop their skills and knowledge more quickly than others, and as such the experience factor is left less important. Someone with less aptitude will require more experience. Someone with barely any aptitude at all is not likely to become a useful senior dev in this century, but given infinite time they could probably manage it.
            – Lightness Races in Orbit
            Nov 23 at 23:12








          • 2




            @Cloud A senior doesn't just know more languages and tools. A senior is more proficient at design, more adept at mentoring, better at communicating, more familiar with politics, more comfortable with customer interactions, more successful at choosing the right tool/architecture/solution for the job, ...... Add a formal project/people management responsibility to a senior and you get a manager, and a manager is far more than someone who knows a bit more C++ than you do.
            – Lightness Races in Orbit
            Nov 26 at 13:09






          • 2




            @Cloud These skills come from experience. That's not to say that you will automatically pick them up after X years of programming, or that there aren't things you can study/consider to aid in your personal development, but it's not something you can do by learning X/Y/Z then away you go. I recommend discussing this topic with your supervisor if it's something you wish to pick up over the course of your career.
            – Lightness Races in Orbit
            Nov 26 at 13:18













          up vote
          23
          down vote










          up vote
          23
          down vote









          The other answers suggest you've made a mistake at some point. I tend to disagree: the situation was lost when Steve thought he could teach you to become a senior programmer and then couldn't keep his temper as he found out he couldn't do it.



          Being a good programmer



          ...doesn't automatically mean you have good teaching skills.



          I'm a programmer myself. I teach in a hackerspace in my spare time and on a few days a year in a school. Teaching requires time and patience. Also you need a whole different skill-set. Just being able to program won't cut it. If your student is to make big steps, you need to prepare your lessons.



          Steve tried to recruit because he needs more people on his team to help do his job. So when he started to teach you instead, it meant he would have even less time to do his 'real' job.



          He must have found out that teaching someone else isn't as easy as he hoped and, as his frustration grew, he began to lose his temper.



          Don't take it too hard on yourself



          It probably isn't even anyone's fault. Take a deep breath. Look around for a new job. Take care it is the kind job you always wanted to do. Take care that your future colleagues are the kind of people you want to work with.






          share|improve this answer














          The other answers suggest you've made a mistake at some point. I tend to disagree: the situation was lost when Steve thought he could teach you to become a senior programmer and then couldn't keep his temper as he found out he couldn't do it.



          Being a good programmer



          ...doesn't automatically mean you have good teaching skills.



          I'm a programmer myself. I teach in a hackerspace in my spare time and on a few days a year in a school. Teaching requires time and patience. Also you need a whole different skill-set. Just being able to program won't cut it. If your student is to make big steps, you need to prepare your lessons.



          Steve tried to recruit because he needs more people on his team to help do his job. So when he started to teach you instead, it meant he would have even less time to do his 'real' job.



          He must have found out that teaching someone else isn't as easy as he hoped and, as his frustration grew, he began to lose his temper.



          Don't take it too hard on yourself



          It probably isn't even anyone's fault. Take a deep breath. Look around for a new job. Take care it is the kind job you always wanted to do. Take care that your future colleagues are the kind of people you want to work with.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Nov 25 at 1:27









          V2Blast

          19218




          19218










          answered Nov 23 at 7:53









          MadMike

          33115




          33115








          • 5




            This is actually what I think happened too. Thanks.
            – Cloud
            Nov 23 at 9:50






          • 2




            In my experience, there is no amount of training that will convert a junior dev into a senior. Some people seem to be born as senior devs, and some people drag themselves there through hard experience. But "training" only results in someone knowing how to do more tasks, not having the ability to generalize to other tasks that they weren't trained in. (So I think the mistake was either/both parties thinking training => senior dev.)
            – user3067860
            Nov 23 at 15:39






          • 5




            @user3067860 I don't think anyone's born a senior dev, but seniors become seniors due to varying mixtures of aptitude and experience. Experience can help to improve aptitude, but some people have enough innate aptitude to develop their skills and knowledge more quickly than others, and as such the experience factor is left less important. Someone with less aptitude will require more experience. Someone with barely any aptitude at all is not likely to become a useful senior dev in this century, but given infinite time they could probably manage it.
            – Lightness Races in Orbit
            Nov 23 at 23:12








          • 2




            @Cloud A senior doesn't just know more languages and tools. A senior is more proficient at design, more adept at mentoring, better at communicating, more familiar with politics, more comfortable with customer interactions, more successful at choosing the right tool/architecture/solution for the job, ...... Add a formal project/people management responsibility to a senior and you get a manager, and a manager is far more than someone who knows a bit more C++ than you do.
            – Lightness Races in Orbit
            Nov 26 at 13:09






          • 2




            @Cloud These skills come from experience. That's not to say that you will automatically pick them up after X years of programming, or that there aren't things you can study/consider to aid in your personal development, but it's not something you can do by learning X/Y/Z then away you go. I recommend discussing this topic with your supervisor if it's something you wish to pick up over the course of your career.
            – Lightness Races in Orbit
            Nov 26 at 13:18














          • 5




            This is actually what I think happened too. Thanks.
            – Cloud
            Nov 23 at 9:50






          • 2




            In my experience, there is no amount of training that will convert a junior dev into a senior. Some people seem to be born as senior devs, and some people drag themselves there through hard experience. But "training" only results in someone knowing how to do more tasks, not having the ability to generalize to other tasks that they weren't trained in. (So I think the mistake was either/both parties thinking training => senior dev.)
            – user3067860
            Nov 23 at 15:39






          • 5




            @user3067860 I don't think anyone's born a senior dev, but seniors become seniors due to varying mixtures of aptitude and experience. Experience can help to improve aptitude, but some people have enough innate aptitude to develop their skills and knowledge more quickly than others, and as such the experience factor is left less important. Someone with less aptitude will require more experience. Someone with barely any aptitude at all is not likely to become a useful senior dev in this century, but given infinite time they could probably manage it.
            – Lightness Races in Orbit
            Nov 23 at 23:12








          • 2




            @Cloud A senior doesn't just know more languages and tools. A senior is more proficient at design, more adept at mentoring, better at communicating, more familiar with politics, more comfortable with customer interactions, more successful at choosing the right tool/architecture/solution for the job, ...... Add a formal project/people management responsibility to a senior and you get a manager, and a manager is far more than someone who knows a bit more C++ than you do.
            – Lightness Races in Orbit
            Nov 26 at 13:09






          • 2




            @Cloud These skills come from experience. That's not to say that you will automatically pick them up after X years of programming, or that there aren't things you can study/consider to aid in your personal development, but it's not something you can do by learning X/Y/Z then away you go. I recommend discussing this topic with your supervisor if it's something you wish to pick up over the course of your career.
            – Lightness Races in Orbit
            Nov 26 at 13:18








          5




          5




          This is actually what I think happened too. Thanks.
          – Cloud
          Nov 23 at 9:50




          This is actually what I think happened too. Thanks.
          – Cloud
          Nov 23 at 9:50




          2




          2




          In my experience, there is no amount of training that will convert a junior dev into a senior. Some people seem to be born as senior devs, and some people drag themselves there through hard experience. But "training" only results in someone knowing how to do more tasks, not having the ability to generalize to other tasks that they weren't trained in. (So I think the mistake was either/both parties thinking training => senior dev.)
          – user3067860
          Nov 23 at 15:39




          In my experience, there is no amount of training that will convert a junior dev into a senior. Some people seem to be born as senior devs, and some people drag themselves there through hard experience. But "training" only results in someone knowing how to do more tasks, not having the ability to generalize to other tasks that they weren't trained in. (So I think the mistake was either/both parties thinking training => senior dev.)
          – user3067860
          Nov 23 at 15:39




          5




          5




          @user3067860 I don't think anyone's born a senior dev, but seniors become seniors due to varying mixtures of aptitude and experience. Experience can help to improve aptitude, but some people have enough innate aptitude to develop their skills and knowledge more quickly than others, and as such the experience factor is left less important. Someone with less aptitude will require more experience. Someone with barely any aptitude at all is not likely to become a useful senior dev in this century, but given infinite time they could probably manage it.
          – Lightness Races in Orbit
          Nov 23 at 23:12






          @user3067860 I don't think anyone's born a senior dev, but seniors become seniors due to varying mixtures of aptitude and experience. Experience can help to improve aptitude, but some people have enough innate aptitude to develop their skills and knowledge more quickly than others, and as such the experience factor is left less important. Someone with less aptitude will require more experience. Someone with barely any aptitude at all is not likely to become a useful senior dev in this century, but given infinite time they could probably manage it.
          – Lightness Races in Orbit
          Nov 23 at 23:12






          2




          2




          @Cloud A senior doesn't just know more languages and tools. A senior is more proficient at design, more adept at mentoring, better at communicating, more familiar with politics, more comfortable with customer interactions, more successful at choosing the right tool/architecture/solution for the job, ...... Add a formal project/people management responsibility to a senior and you get a manager, and a manager is far more than someone who knows a bit more C++ than you do.
          – Lightness Races in Orbit
          Nov 26 at 13:09




          @Cloud A senior doesn't just know more languages and tools. A senior is more proficient at design, more adept at mentoring, better at communicating, more familiar with politics, more comfortable with customer interactions, more successful at choosing the right tool/architecture/solution for the job, ...... Add a formal project/people management responsibility to a senior and you get a manager, and a manager is far more than someone who knows a bit more C++ than you do.
          – Lightness Races in Orbit
          Nov 26 at 13:09




          2




          2




          @Cloud These skills come from experience. That's not to say that you will automatically pick them up after X years of programming, or that there aren't things you can study/consider to aid in your personal development, but it's not something you can do by learning X/Y/Z then away you go. I recommend discussing this topic with your supervisor if it's something you wish to pick up over the course of your career.
          – Lightness Races in Orbit
          Nov 26 at 13:18




          @Cloud These skills come from experience. That's not to say that you will automatically pick them up after X years of programming, or that there aren't things you can study/consider to aid in your personal development, but it's not something you can do by learning X/Y/Z then away you go. I recommend discussing this topic with your supervisor if it's something you wish to pick up over the course of your career.
          – Lightness Races in Orbit
          Nov 26 at 13:18










          up vote
          17
          down vote













          OP I'm sorry but I think that the "investigation" was basically over in a week. You were given 9 weeks to begin searching for a new job, which you did not take the hint for. I say this because software developers are not a resource that is wasted lightly.



          Update your resume and start looking immediately, additionally note how your other coworkers are treating you; you'll need to get references from someone at this company who is not Steve or in the HR hierarchy who have dismissed your claims of harassment.






          share|improve this answer



















          • 2




            This might be a good time to switch to contracting, where references are not asked for (in my few decades of experience, but YMMV).
            – Mawg
            Nov 23 at 7:37










          • @Mawg Not a bad idea, but I'm not good enough for that. C# is the only language I could contract with it and I am still a very basic / console app C# dev. I don't know any frameworks even yet...
            – Cloud
            Nov 26 at 13:35










          • Not good enough yet? I felt that way few too – a few decades back :-) Just look around your office – are there any contractors? How do they rate alongside your permanent colleagues? Not much difference, I guess. I have known good and poor contractors, just as I have permanent staff. Don't decide for yourself whether you are good enough – let the interviewer decide (and contractor interviews are easier to get through than perm). If you are really unsure, visit a site like monster.com, find a contract job you think you can handle, call a recruitment agency and ask their opinion of your CV.
            – Mawg
            Nov 26 at 13:58






          • 1




            @Cloud I once saw a contractor hired for $1000 per day. He couldn't even write a Sql script that compiled in one shot. Before we could convince the boss to get rid of him he had made 2x my monthly salary!!! I think if you're competent, you'd go far...
            – C Bauer
            Nov 26 at 14:26















          up vote
          17
          down vote













          OP I'm sorry but I think that the "investigation" was basically over in a week. You were given 9 weeks to begin searching for a new job, which you did not take the hint for. I say this because software developers are not a resource that is wasted lightly.



          Update your resume and start looking immediately, additionally note how your other coworkers are treating you; you'll need to get references from someone at this company who is not Steve or in the HR hierarchy who have dismissed your claims of harassment.






          share|improve this answer



















          • 2




            This might be a good time to switch to contracting, where references are not asked for (in my few decades of experience, but YMMV).
            – Mawg
            Nov 23 at 7:37










          • @Mawg Not a bad idea, but I'm not good enough for that. C# is the only language I could contract with it and I am still a very basic / console app C# dev. I don't know any frameworks even yet...
            – Cloud
            Nov 26 at 13:35










          • Not good enough yet? I felt that way few too – a few decades back :-) Just look around your office – are there any contractors? How do they rate alongside your permanent colleagues? Not much difference, I guess. I have known good and poor contractors, just as I have permanent staff. Don't decide for yourself whether you are good enough – let the interviewer decide (and contractor interviews are easier to get through than perm). If you are really unsure, visit a site like monster.com, find a contract job you think you can handle, call a recruitment agency and ask their opinion of your CV.
            – Mawg
            Nov 26 at 13:58






          • 1




            @Cloud I once saw a contractor hired for $1000 per day. He couldn't even write a Sql script that compiled in one shot. Before we could convince the boss to get rid of him he had made 2x my monthly salary!!! I think if you're competent, you'd go far...
            – C Bauer
            Nov 26 at 14:26













          up vote
          17
          down vote










          up vote
          17
          down vote









          OP I'm sorry but I think that the "investigation" was basically over in a week. You were given 9 weeks to begin searching for a new job, which you did not take the hint for. I say this because software developers are not a resource that is wasted lightly.



          Update your resume and start looking immediately, additionally note how your other coworkers are treating you; you'll need to get references from someone at this company who is not Steve or in the HR hierarchy who have dismissed your claims of harassment.






          share|improve this answer














          OP I'm sorry but I think that the "investigation" was basically over in a week. You were given 9 weeks to begin searching for a new job, which you did not take the hint for. I say this because software developers are not a resource that is wasted lightly.



          Update your resume and start looking immediately, additionally note how your other coworkers are treating you; you'll need to get references from someone at this company who is not Steve or in the HR hierarchy who have dismissed your claims of harassment.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Nov 23 at 2:20

























          answered Nov 23 at 2:14









          C Bauer

          653313




          653313








          • 2




            This might be a good time to switch to contracting, where references are not asked for (in my few decades of experience, but YMMV).
            – Mawg
            Nov 23 at 7:37










          • @Mawg Not a bad idea, but I'm not good enough for that. C# is the only language I could contract with it and I am still a very basic / console app C# dev. I don't know any frameworks even yet...
            – Cloud
            Nov 26 at 13:35










          • Not good enough yet? I felt that way few too – a few decades back :-) Just look around your office – are there any contractors? How do they rate alongside your permanent colleagues? Not much difference, I guess. I have known good and poor contractors, just as I have permanent staff. Don't decide for yourself whether you are good enough – let the interviewer decide (and contractor interviews are easier to get through than perm). If you are really unsure, visit a site like monster.com, find a contract job you think you can handle, call a recruitment agency and ask their opinion of your CV.
            – Mawg
            Nov 26 at 13:58






          • 1




            @Cloud I once saw a contractor hired for $1000 per day. He couldn't even write a Sql script that compiled in one shot. Before we could convince the boss to get rid of him he had made 2x my monthly salary!!! I think if you're competent, you'd go far...
            – C Bauer
            Nov 26 at 14:26














          • 2




            This might be a good time to switch to contracting, where references are not asked for (in my few decades of experience, but YMMV).
            – Mawg
            Nov 23 at 7:37










          • @Mawg Not a bad idea, but I'm not good enough for that. C# is the only language I could contract with it and I am still a very basic / console app C# dev. I don't know any frameworks even yet...
            – Cloud
            Nov 26 at 13:35










          • Not good enough yet? I felt that way few too – a few decades back :-) Just look around your office – are there any contractors? How do they rate alongside your permanent colleagues? Not much difference, I guess. I have known good and poor contractors, just as I have permanent staff. Don't decide for yourself whether you are good enough – let the interviewer decide (and contractor interviews are easier to get through than perm). If you are really unsure, visit a site like monster.com, find a contract job you think you can handle, call a recruitment agency and ask their opinion of your CV.
            – Mawg
            Nov 26 at 13:58






          • 1




            @Cloud I once saw a contractor hired for $1000 per day. He couldn't even write a Sql script that compiled in one shot. Before we could convince the boss to get rid of him he had made 2x my monthly salary!!! I think if you're competent, you'd go far...
            – C Bauer
            Nov 26 at 14:26








          2




          2




          This might be a good time to switch to contracting, where references are not asked for (in my few decades of experience, but YMMV).
          – Mawg
          Nov 23 at 7:37




          This might be a good time to switch to contracting, where references are not asked for (in my few decades of experience, but YMMV).
          – Mawg
          Nov 23 at 7:37












          @Mawg Not a bad idea, but I'm not good enough for that. C# is the only language I could contract with it and I am still a very basic / console app C# dev. I don't know any frameworks even yet...
          – Cloud
          Nov 26 at 13:35




          @Mawg Not a bad idea, but I'm not good enough for that. C# is the only language I could contract with it and I am still a very basic / console app C# dev. I don't know any frameworks even yet...
          – Cloud
          Nov 26 at 13:35












          Not good enough yet? I felt that way few too – a few decades back :-) Just look around your office – are there any contractors? How do they rate alongside your permanent colleagues? Not much difference, I guess. I have known good and poor contractors, just as I have permanent staff. Don't decide for yourself whether you are good enough – let the interviewer decide (and contractor interviews are easier to get through than perm). If you are really unsure, visit a site like monster.com, find a contract job you think you can handle, call a recruitment agency and ask their opinion of your CV.
          – Mawg
          Nov 26 at 13:58




          Not good enough yet? I felt that way few too – a few decades back :-) Just look around your office – are there any contractors? How do they rate alongside your permanent colleagues? Not much difference, I guess. I have known good and poor contractors, just as I have permanent staff. Don't decide for yourself whether you are good enough – let the interviewer decide (and contractor interviews are easier to get through than perm). If you are really unsure, visit a site like monster.com, find a contract job you think you can handle, call a recruitment agency and ask their opinion of your CV.
          – Mawg
          Nov 26 at 13:58




          1




          1




          @Cloud I once saw a contractor hired for $1000 per day. He couldn't even write a Sql script that compiled in one shot. Before we could convince the boss to get rid of him he had made 2x my monthly salary!!! I think if you're competent, you'd go far...
          – C Bauer
          Nov 26 at 14:26




          @Cloud I once saw a contractor hired for $1000 per day. He couldn't even write a Sql script that compiled in one shot. Before we could convince the boss to get rid of him he had made 2x my monthly salary!!! I think if you're competent, you'd go far...
          – C Bauer
          Nov 26 at 14:26










          up vote
          9
          down vote













          Unfortunately you may need to find a new job now, but at least your job title has "senior" in it and you have plenty of time to search. Remember that you only need to put "Senior Software Developer at Company X 20XX-present" on your CV.



          You mention that you are logging your boss' behaviour, so keep doing that. In particular your requests for meetings, so that if they try to claim your performance is poor later you can cite the lack of work and repeated requests for it as the reason. At least in Europe they can't fire you when the boss is doing that to you, it would be constructive dismissal.



          As to salvaging your current situation, could you ask for an internal transfer? If not, your only real option is to go back to HR and complain about a hostile work environment where you are unable to get any work or progress your career, due to retaliation. That is a serious situation, you could escalate it to a tribunal, so they should deal with it in a way that doesn't disadvantage you.






          share|improve this answer

























            up vote
            9
            down vote













            Unfortunately you may need to find a new job now, but at least your job title has "senior" in it and you have plenty of time to search. Remember that you only need to put "Senior Software Developer at Company X 20XX-present" on your CV.



            You mention that you are logging your boss' behaviour, so keep doing that. In particular your requests for meetings, so that if they try to claim your performance is poor later you can cite the lack of work and repeated requests for it as the reason. At least in Europe they can't fire you when the boss is doing that to you, it would be constructive dismissal.



            As to salvaging your current situation, could you ask for an internal transfer? If not, your only real option is to go back to HR and complain about a hostile work environment where you are unable to get any work or progress your career, due to retaliation. That is a serious situation, you could escalate it to a tribunal, so they should deal with it in a way that doesn't disadvantage you.






            share|improve this answer























              up vote
              9
              down vote










              up vote
              9
              down vote









              Unfortunately you may need to find a new job now, but at least your job title has "senior" in it and you have plenty of time to search. Remember that you only need to put "Senior Software Developer at Company X 20XX-present" on your CV.



              You mention that you are logging your boss' behaviour, so keep doing that. In particular your requests for meetings, so that if they try to claim your performance is poor later you can cite the lack of work and repeated requests for it as the reason. At least in Europe they can't fire you when the boss is doing that to you, it would be constructive dismissal.



              As to salvaging your current situation, could you ask for an internal transfer? If not, your only real option is to go back to HR and complain about a hostile work environment where you are unable to get any work or progress your career, due to retaliation. That is a serious situation, you could escalate it to a tribunal, so they should deal with it in a way that doesn't disadvantage you.






              share|improve this answer












              Unfortunately you may need to find a new job now, but at least your job title has "senior" in it and you have plenty of time to search. Remember that you only need to put "Senior Software Developer at Company X 20XX-present" on your CV.



              You mention that you are logging your boss' behaviour, so keep doing that. In particular your requests for meetings, so that if they try to claim your performance is poor later you can cite the lack of work and repeated requests for it as the reason. At least in Europe they can't fire you when the boss is doing that to you, it would be constructive dismissal.



              As to salvaging your current situation, could you ask for an internal transfer? If not, your only real option is to go back to HR and complain about a hostile work environment where you are unable to get any work or progress your career, due to retaliation. That is a serious situation, you could escalate it to a tribunal, so they should deal with it in a way that doesn't disadvantage you.







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered Nov 23 at 9:30









              user

              2,0761715




              2,0761715






















                  up vote
                  4
                  down vote













                  Check the work legislation of your country. In Spain, an employer must provide adequate tasks to their employees. If your employer is not providing you any task, this could be consider as mobbing -which is what they are actually doing, to force you to leave the company. An employee can claim to have work.
                  Of course, you are in a bad position. If I were in your situation and this was a small company, I would be thinking about leaving. But if this is a big company, maybe my dream company, then being moved to another department would be ok for me. If you speak with HR and expose this as a case of mobbing, then they may take you more seriously. No company wants to be in the media because of mobbing. On the other hand, if you are thinking about quitting, this can give you a better position to negotiate an exit with a compensation.






                  share|improve this answer

























                    up vote
                    4
                    down vote













                    Check the work legislation of your country. In Spain, an employer must provide adequate tasks to their employees. If your employer is not providing you any task, this could be consider as mobbing -which is what they are actually doing, to force you to leave the company. An employee can claim to have work.
                    Of course, you are in a bad position. If I were in your situation and this was a small company, I would be thinking about leaving. But if this is a big company, maybe my dream company, then being moved to another department would be ok for me. If you speak with HR and expose this as a case of mobbing, then they may take you more seriously. No company wants to be in the media because of mobbing. On the other hand, if you are thinking about quitting, this can give you a better position to negotiate an exit with a compensation.






                    share|improve this answer























                      up vote
                      4
                      down vote










                      up vote
                      4
                      down vote









                      Check the work legislation of your country. In Spain, an employer must provide adequate tasks to their employees. If your employer is not providing you any task, this could be consider as mobbing -which is what they are actually doing, to force you to leave the company. An employee can claim to have work.
                      Of course, you are in a bad position. If I were in your situation and this was a small company, I would be thinking about leaving. But if this is a big company, maybe my dream company, then being moved to another department would be ok for me. If you speak with HR and expose this as a case of mobbing, then they may take you more seriously. No company wants to be in the media because of mobbing. On the other hand, if you are thinking about quitting, this can give you a better position to negotiate an exit with a compensation.






                      share|improve this answer












                      Check the work legislation of your country. In Spain, an employer must provide adequate tasks to their employees. If your employer is not providing you any task, this could be consider as mobbing -which is what they are actually doing, to force you to leave the company. An employee can claim to have work.
                      Of course, you are in a bad position. If I were in your situation and this was a small company, I would be thinking about leaving. But if this is a big company, maybe my dream company, then being moved to another department would be ok for me. If you speak with HR and expose this as a case of mobbing, then they may take you more seriously. No company wants to be in the media because of mobbing. On the other hand, if you are thinking about quitting, this can give you a better position to negotiate an exit with a compensation.







                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered Nov 23 at 13:40









                      Josi

                      411




                      411






















                          up vote
                          3
                          down vote













                          Your manager acted petty (or maybe you did not understand the situation completely but let's assume you are right), but your question is unjustified now. If you wanted to salvage the relation, that should have been your first approach rather than going to HR. By going to HR you made an implicit judgment that the relationship was not salvageable in the first place.



                          However, even though you could (and should) have picked a better response to your manager's behavior, I don't think it is all only your fault.





                          It is unfortunate that your colleagues couched when asked formally by HR. Also, it is unfortunate that your manager's manager preferred taking his friend's side rather than taking the right side.





                          Since the relation is not salvageable unless someone has a sudden change of heart and this guy in question is your manager, the best direction is to get a new job.



                          It may be bitter tasting but it is the next best thing that can happen to you.






                          share|improve this answer

























                            up vote
                            3
                            down vote













                            Your manager acted petty (or maybe you did not understand the situation completely but let's assume you are right), but your question is unjustified now. If you wanted to salvage the relation, that should have been your first approach rather than going to HR. By going to HR you made an implicit judgment that the relationship was not salvageable in the first place.



                            However, even though you could (and should) have picked a better response to your manager's behavior, I don't think it is all only your fault.





                            It is unfortunate that your colleagues couched when asked formally by HR. Also, it is unfortunate that your manager's manager preferred taking his friend's side rather than taking the right side.





                            Since the relation is not salvageable unless someone has a sudden change of heart and this guy in question is your manager, the best direction is to get a new job.



                            It may be bitter tasting but it is the next best thing that can happen to you.






                            share|improve this answer























                              up vote
                              3
                              down vote










                              up vote
                              3
                              down vote









                              Your manager acted petty (or maybe you did not understand the situation completely but let's assume you are right), but your question is unjustified now. If you wanted to salvage the relation, that should have been your first approach rather than going to HR. By going to HR you made an implicit judgment that the relationship was not salvageable in the first place.



                              However, even though you could (and should) have picked a better response to your manager's behavior, I don't think it is all only your fault.





                              It is unfortunate that your colleagues couched when asked formally by HR. Also, it is unfortunate that your manager's manager preferred taking his friend's side rather than taking the right side.





                              Since the relation is not salvageable unless someone has a sudden change of heart and this guy in question is your manager, the best direction is to get a new job.



                              It may be bitter tasting but it is the next best thing that can happen to you.






                              share|improve this answer












                              Your manager acted petty (or maybe you did not understand the situation completely but let's assume you are right), but your question is unjustified now. If you wanted to salvage the relation, that should have been your first approach rather than going to HR. By going to HR you made an implicit judgment that the relationship was not salvageable in the first place.



                              However, even though you could (and should) have picked a better response to your manager's behavior, I don't think it is all only your fault.





                              It is unfortunate that your colleagues couched when asked formally by HR. Also, it is unfortunate that your manager's manager preferred taking his friend's side rather than taking the right side.





                              Since the relation is not salvageable unless someone has a sudden change of heart and this guy in question is your manager, the best direction is to get a new job.



                              It may be bitter tasting but it is the next best thing that can happen to you.







                              share|improve this answer












                              share|improve this answer



                              share|improve this answer










                              answered Nov 22 at 20:56









                              displayName

                              26216




                              26216






















                                  up vote
                                  2
                                  down vote













                                  It depends if salvageable means get back to the way it was before you filed the complaint, improve things so they're better than when you filed the complaint, or just salvageable as in you can stick around and not get fired, I'd say they are all possible. Getting to do what it takes to salvage will determine how possible it really is, though.



                                  If you can find out what Steve's core needs are and find a way to tell him what is core needs are, you will disarm him. This is a core tenet of nonviolent communication. For example, if he has a need for competence and effectiveness more than anything, you could find a way to express you see this as a need of his and it will be very relieving for him to hear. It will create some connection between the two of you. That may be enough to salvage things.



                                  If you are on your way out, as a lot of other posts advise, I suggest at least trying this. You don't have much to lose and it will be good practice for the next time you are in a conflict. Building the case against him, while done out of the need for peace and equality, in his perspective is the opposite of seeing where he is coming from. If you can see where he is coming from, you have the best chance of salvaging the situation. He may feel threatened by you and not trust you after that happened. If he was merely frustrated he couldn't teach you, now he is probably scared of you. If you succeeded in getting him to change by forcing him to through HR, he still would not like you. You may even be asking the same question you are now, if things can be salvaged after filing complaints against coworkers.



                                  If you are going to use tactics of pursuing justice from authorities who have powers you don't, it won't truly get him to change. In the Art of War it talks about taking the enemy whole. Had you won with HR, Steve still would have greatly disliked you. This is the equivalent to defeating an enemy and taking their land, but burning all their fields of wheat in the process. Better to take the enemy and their fields of wheat than take the enemy and burn their fields of wheat.



                                  But for it being salvageable, I'll go with yes, it can be. Just see his needs as a person and empathize/express you see them. That connection is rare in the business world. It may be hard to have the chance at doing that now, though. If you can't get close to him and have the opportunity to do this, maybe it's not worth staying there. I live in a small market, so I can empathize with wanting to salvage things as opposed to just moving on.






                                  share|improve this answer










                                  New contributor




                                  nicklocicero is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






















                                    up vote
                                    2
                                    down vote













                                    It depends if salvageable means get back to the way it was before you filed the complaint, improve things so they're better than when you filed the complaint, or just salvageable as in you can stick around and not get fired, I'd say they are all possible. Getting to do what it takes to salvage will determine how possible it really is, though.



                                    If you can find out what Steve's core needs are and find a way to tell him what is core needs are, you will disarm him. This is a core tenet of nonviolent communication. For example, if he has a need for competence and effectiveness more than anything, you could find a way to express you see this as a need of his and it will be very relieving for him to hear. It will create some connection between the two of you. That may be enough to salvage things.



                                    If you are on your way out, as a lot of other posts advise, I suggest at least trying this. You don't have much to lose and it will be good practice for the next time you are in a conflict. Building the case against him, while done out of the need for peace and equality, in his perspective is the opposite of seeing where he is coming from. If you can see where he is coming from, you have the best chance of salvaging the situation. He may feel threatened by you and not trust you after that happened. If he was merely frustrated he couldn't teach you, now he is probably scared of you. If you succeeded in getting him to change by forcing him to through HR, he still would not like you. You may even be asking the same question you are now, if things can be salvaged after filing complaints against coworkers.



                                    If you are going to use tactics of pursuing justice from authorities who have powers you don't, it won't truly get him to change. In the Art of War it talks about taking the enemy whole. Had you won with HR, Steve still would have greatly disliked you. This is the equivalent to defeating an enemy and taking their land, but burning all their fields of wheat in the process. Better to take the enemy and their fields of wheat than take the enemy and burn their fields of wheat.



                                    But for it being salvageable, I'll go with yes, it can be. Just see his needs as a person and empathize/express you see them. That connection is rare in the business world. It may be hard to have the chance at doing that now, though. If you can't get close to him and have the opportunity to do this, maybe it's not worth staying there. I live in a small market, so I can empathize with wanting to salvage things as opposed to just moving on.






                                    share|improve this answer










                                    New contributor




                                    nicklocicero is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                    Check out our Code of Conduct.




















                                      up vote
                                      2
                                      down vote










                                      up vote
                                      2
                                      down vote









                                      It depends if salvageable means get back to the way it was before you filed the complaint, improve things so they're better than when you filed the complaint, or just salvageable as in you can stick around and not get fired, I'd say they are all possible. Getting to do what it takes to salvage will determine how possible it really is, though.



                                      If you can find out what Steve's core needs are and find a way to tell him what is core needs are, you will disarm him. This is a core tenet of nonviolent communication. For example, if he has a need for competence and effectiveness more than anything, you could find a way to express you see this as a need of his and it will be very relieving for him to hear. It will create some connection between the two of you. That may be enough to salvage things.



                                      If you are on your way out, as a lot of other posts advise, I suggest at least trying this. You don't have much to lose and it will be good practice for the next time you are in a conflict. Building the case against him, while done out of the need for peace and equality, in his perspective is the opposite of seeing where he is coming from. If you can see where he is coming from, you have the best chance of salvaging the situation. He may feel threatened by you and not trust you after that happened. If he was merely frustrated he couldn't teach you, now he is probably scared of you. If you succeeded in getting him to change by forcing him to through HR, he still would not like you. You may even be asking the same question you are now, if things can be salvaged after filing complaints against coworkers.



                                      If you are going to use tactics of pursuing justice from authorities who have powers you don't, it won't truly get him to change. In the Art of War it talks about taking the enemy whole. Had you won with HR, Steve still would have greatly disliked you. This is the equivalent to defeating an enemy and taking their land, but burning all their fields of wheat in the process. Better to take the enemy and their fields of wheat than take the enemy and burn their fields of wheat.



                                      But for it being salvageable, I'll go with yes, it can be. Just see his needs as a person and empathize/express you see them. That connection is rare in the business world. It may be hard to have the chance at doing that now, though. If you can't get close to him and have the opportunity to do this, maybe it's not worth staying there. I live in a small market, so I can empathize with wanting to salvage things as opposed to just moving on.






                                      share|improve this answer










                                      New contributor




                                      nicklocicero is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                      It depends if salvageable means get back to the way it was before you filed the complaint, improve things so they're better than when you filed the complaint, or just salvageable as in you can stick around and not get fired, I'd say they are all possible. Getting to do what it takes to salvage will determine how possible it really is, though.



                                      If you can find out what Steve's core needs are and find a way to tell him what is core needs are, you will disarm him. This is a core tenet of nonviolent communication. For example, if he has a need for competence and effectiveness more than anything, you could find a way to express you see this as a need of his and it will be very relieving for him to hear. It will create some connection between the two of you. That may be enough to salvage things.



                                      If you are on your way out, as a lot of other posts advise, I suggest at least trying this. You don't have much to lose and it will be good practice for the next time you are in a conflict. Building the case against him, while done out of the need for peace and equality, in his perspective is the opposite of seeing where he is coming from. If you can see where he is coming from, you have the best chance of salvaging the situation. He may feel threatened by you and not trust you after that happened. If he was merely frustrated he couldn't teach you, now he is probably scared of you. If you succeeded in getting him to change by forcing him to through HR, he still would not like you. You may even be asking the same question you are now, if things can be salvaged after filing complaints against coworkers.



                                      If you are going to use tactics of pursuing justice from authorities who have powers you don't, it won't truly get him to change. In the Art of War it talks about taking the enemy whole. Had you won with HR, Steve still would have greatly disliked you. This is the equivalent to defeating an enemy and taking their land, but burning all their fields of wheat in the process. Better to take the enemy and their fields of wheat than take the enemy and burn their fields of wheat.



                                      But for it being salvageable, I'll go with yes, it can be. Just see his needs as a person and empathize/express you see them. That connection is rare in the business world. It may be hard to have the chance at doing that now, though. If you can't get close to him and have the opportunity to do this, maybe it's not worth staying there. I live in a small market, so I can empathize with wanting to salvage things as opposed to just moving on.







                                      share|improve this answer










                                      New contributor




                                      nicklocicero is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                      share|improve this answer



                                      share|improve this answer








                                      edited Nov 24 at 8:13





















                                      New contributor




                                      nicklocicero is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                      answered Nov 24 at 8:04









                                      nicklocicero

                                      212




                                      212




                                      New contributor




                                      nicklocicero is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.





                                      New contributor





                                      nicklocicero is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.






                                      nicklocicero is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















                                          up vote
                                          -4
                                          down vote













                                          You could just do one last thing. Go to a doctor, get a sick leave for a few month because of whatever reason and look for alternatives.






                                          share|improve this answer











                                          We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.










                                          • 3




                                            without an explanation, this answer may become useless in case if someone else posts an opposite opinion. For example, if someone posts a claim like "Don't go to a doctor, get a sick leave for a few month because of whatever reason and look for alternatives.", how would this answer help reader to pick of two opposing opinions? Consider editing it into a better shape, to meet How to Answer guidelines
                                            – gnat
                                            Nov 24 at 9:39










                                          • How you get sick certificate?
                                            – dgrat
                                            Nov 24 at 13:09






                                          • 1




                                            This would be good advice in some countries, generally useless in the US. You would put in a mental health claim, because obviously you aren't sick. But that's not great for finding a new job, especially if a prospective employer can call the current one to verify employment and be told that you're out for that reason. Face it, you had 10 weeks to job search normally and you've blown it. Now hurry to get something, anything, because you'll be out at the first pretext.
                                            – George M
                                            Nov 25 at 19:30















                                          up vote
                                          -4
                                          down vote













                                          You could just do one last thing. Go to a doctor, get a sick leave for a few month because of whatever reason and look for alternatives.






                                          share|improve this answer











                                          We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.










                                          • 3




                                            without an explanation, this answer may become useless in case if someone else posts an opposite opinion. For example, if someone posts a claim like "Don't go to a doctor, get a sick leave for a few month because of whatever reason and look for alternatives.", how would this answer help reader to pick of two opposing opinions? Consider editing it into a better shape, to meet How to Answer guidelines
                                            – gnat
                                            Nov 24 at 9:39










                                          • How you get sick certificate?
                                            – dgrat
                                            Nov 24 at 13:09






                                          • 1




                                            This would be good advice in some countries, generally useless in the US. You would put in a mental health claim, because obviously you aren't sick. But that's not great for finding a new job, especially if a prospective employer can call the current one to verify employment and be told that you're out for that reason. Face it, you had 10 weeks to job search normally and you've blown it. Now hurry to get something, anything, because you'll be out at the first pretext.
                                            – George M
                                            Nov 25 at 19:30













                                          up vote
                                          -4
                                          down vote










                                          up vote
                                          -4
                                          down vote









                                          You could just do one last thing. Go to a doctor, get a sick leave for a few month because of whatever reason and look for alternatives.






                                          share|improve this answer












                                          You could just do one last thing. Go to a doctor, get a sick leave for a few month because of whatever reason and look for alternatives.







                                          share|improve this answer












                                          share|improve this answer



                                          share|improve this answer










                                          answered Nov 23 at 13:32









                                          dgrat

                                          11716




                                          11716



                                          We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.




                                          We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.









                                          • 3




                                            without an explanation, this answer may become useless in case if someone else posts an opposite opinion. For example, if someone posts a claim like "Don't go to a doctor, get a sick leave for a few month because of whatever reason and look for alternatives.", how would this answer help reader to pick of two opposing opinions? Consider editing it into a better shape, to meet How to Answer guidelines
                                            – gnat
                                            Nov 24 at 9:39










                                          • How you get sick certificate?
                                            – dgrat
                                            Nov 24 at 13:09






                                          • 1




                                            This would be good advice in some countries, generally useless in the US. You would put in a mental health claim, because obviously you aren't sick. But that's not great for finding a new job, especially if a prospective employer can call the current one to verify employment and be told that you're out for that reason. Face it, you had 10 weeks to job search normally and you've blown it. Now hurry to get something, anything, because you'll be out at the first pretext.
                                            – George M
                                            Nov 25 at 19:30














                                          • 3




                                            without an explanation, this answer may become useless in case if someone else posts an opposite opinion. For example, if someone posts a claim like "Don't go to a doctor, get a sick leave for a few month because of whatever reason and look for alternatives.", how would this answer help reader to pick of two opposing opinions? Consider editing it into a better shape, to meet How to Answer guidelines
                                            – gnat
                                            Nov 24 at 9:39










                                          • How you get sick certificate?
                                            – dgrat
                                            Nov 24 at 13:09






                                          • 1




                                            This would be good advice in some countries, generally useless in the US. You would put in a mental health claim, because obviously you aren't sick. But that's not great for finding a new job, especially if a prospective employer can call the current one to verify employment and be told that you're out for that reason. Face it, you had 10 weeks to job search normally and you've blown it. Now hurry to get something, anything, because you'll be out at the first pretext.
                                            – George M
                                            Nov 25 at 19:30








                                          3




                                          3




                                          without an explanation, this answer may become useless in case if someone else posts an opposite opinion. For example, if someone posts a claim like "Don't go to a doctor, get a sick leave for a few month because of whatever reason and look for alternatives.", how would this answer help reader to pick of two opposing opinions? Consider editing it into a better shape, to meet How to Answer guidelines
                                          – gnat
                                          Nov 24 at 9:39




                                          without an explanation, this answer may become useless in case if someone else posts an opposite opinion. For example, if someone posts a claim like "Don't go to a doctor, get a sick leave for a few month because of whatever reason and look for alternatives.", how would this answer help reader to pick of two opposing opinions? Consider editing it into a better shape, to meet How to Answer guidelines
                                          – gnat
                                          Nov 24 at 9:39












                                          How you get sick certificate?
                                          – dgrat
                                          Nov 24 at 13:09




                                          How you get sick certificate?
                                          – dgrat
                                          Nov 24 at 13:09




                                          1




                                          1




                                          This would be good advice in some countries, generally useless in the US. You would put in a mental health claim, because obviously you aren't sick. But that's not great for finding a new job, especially if a prospective employer can call the current one to verify employment and be told that you're out for that reason. Face it, you had 10 weeks to job search normally and you've blown it. Now hurry to get something, anything, because you'll be out at the first pretext.
                                          – George M
                                          Nov 25 at 19:30




                                          This would be good advice in some countries, generally useless in the US. You would put in a mental health claim, because obviously you aren't sick. But that's not great for finding a new job, especially if a prospective employer can call the current one to verify employment and be told that you're out for that reason. Face it, you had 10 weeks to job search normally and you've blown it. Now hurry to get something, anything, because you'll be out at the first pretext.
                                          – George M
                                          Nov 25 at 19:30





                                          protected by Jane S Nov 25 at 6:42



                                          Thank you for your interest in this question.
                                          Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



                                          Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?



                                          Popular posts from this blog

                                          Сан-Квентин

                                          8-я гвардейская общевойсковая армия

                                          Алькесар