Get subsets of a set given as a list
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
This code is meant to create a list of subsets of a given set which is represented as a list.
I'm doing this to improve my style and to improve my knowledge of fundamental algorithms/data structures for an upcoming coding interview.
def subsets(s):
if s == :
return [s]
sets = [s]
for i in range(0, len(s)):
tmp_subsets = subsets(s[:i] + s[i+1:])
for subset in tmp_subsets:
if subset not in sets:
sets.append(subset)
return sets
I'm also not sure if using the set()
data structure would be considered cheating in an interview context.
If there are any ideas about how to improve its performance without significantly compromising on readability I would also be open to that.
python performance python-3.x recursion reinventing-the-wheel
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
This code is meant to create a list of subsets of a given set which is represented as a list.
I'm doing this to improve my style and to improve my knowledge of fundamental algorithms/data structures for an upcoming coding interview.
def subsets(s):
if s == :
return [s]
sets = [s]
for i in range(0, len(s)):
tmp_subsets = subsets(s[:i] + s[i+1:])
for subset in tmp_subsets:
if subset not in sets:
sets.append(subset)
return sets
I'm also not sure if using the set()
data structure would be considered cheating in an interview context.
If there are any ideas about how to improve its performance without significantly compromising on readability I would also be open to that.
python performance python-3.x recursion reinventing-the-wheel
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
This code is meant to create a list of subsets of a given set which is represented as a list.
I'm doing this to improve my style and to improve my knowledge of fundamental algorithms/data structures for an upcoming coding interview.
def subsets(s):
if s == :
return [s]
sets = [s]
for i in range(0, len(s)):
tmp_subsets = subsets(s[:i] + s[i+1:])
for subset in tmp_subsets:
if subset not in sets:
sets.append(subset)
return sets
I'm also not sure if using the set()
data structure would be considered cheating in an interview context.
If there are any ideas about how to improve its performance without significantly compromising on readability I would also be open to that.
python performance python-3.x recursion reinventing-the-wheel
This code is meant to create a list of subsets of a given set which is represented as a list.
I'm doing this to improve my style and to improve my knowledge of fundamental algorithms/data structures for an upcoming coding interview.
def subsets(s):
if s == :
return [s]
sets = [s]
for i in range(0, len(s)):
tmp_subsets = subsets(s[:i] + s[i+1:])
for subset in tmp_subsets:
if subset not in sets:
sets.append(subset)
return sets
I'm also not sure if using the set()
data structure would be considered cheating in an interview context.
If there are any ideas about how to improve its performance without significantly compromising on readability I would also be open to that.
python performance python-3.x recursion reinventing-the-wheel
python performance python-3.x recursion reinventing-the-wheel
asked Nov 20 '16 at 21:40
cycloidistic
1701211
1701211
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
up vote
6
down vote
This is unnecessary:
if s == :
return [s]
You can safely remove it, the program will still work.
This step is not so great:
if subset not in sets:
sets.append(subset)
For two reasons:
- Checking if a list contains some items is an $O(n)$ operation
- Comparing sets is not free either
A more efficient solution is to count from 0
until 1 << n
, and use the bitmap of the count to decide the elements that are part of a subset.
def subsets(s):
sets =
for i in range(1 << len(s)):
subset = [s[bit] for bit in range(len(s)) if is_bit_set(i, bit)]
sets.append(subset)
return sets
def is_bit_set(num, bit):
return num & (1 << bit) > 0
That is, in a subset, each element may be either present, or not. So each element has only 2 possible states: in or out. 1 or 0. If we look at the binary representation of numbers from 0 to 2^n -1
, where n
is the number of elements, for example when n=3
, we have:
cba
0 = 000
1 = 001
2 = 010
3 = 011
4 = 100
5 = 101
6 = 110
7 = 111
There are 8 possible subsets, and the bits represent whether an element is in the subset or not.
This is the idea used by the program:
- The outer loop goes from
0
until2^n - 1
. - The inner loop goes from
0
untiln - 1
.
1 << bit
is 1 shifted to the leftbit
times.
For example, when i = 3
, that corresponds to bits 011
.
We loop from 0
until 2
, comparing i
against 001
, 010
, and 100
.
For these values, the expression i & (1 << bit)
will be evaluated as
011 & 001 = 001
, 011 & 010 = 010
, and 011 & 100 = 000
, respectively.
The first two are greater than 0, the last one is not.
Please explain in more detail what you are doing instead of the "if subset not in sets: ..." part.
– Nikolas Rieble
Nov 20 '16 at 22:20
@NikolasRieble I added more explanation about the bit shifting algorithm.
– janos
Nov 20 '16 at 22:45
@janos Thanks for the answer. Removing the first return makes sense. Also, it's good that you mentioned thatnot in
isO(n)
. That will be useful for the future. The fact that you can represent a set as a bitmap and that all the subsets are just all the numbers from 0 to len(s) is quite elegant. I never thought about it that way. I'll be sure to use more bitmaps in the future :)
– cycloidistic
Nov 21 '16 at 6:10
@cycloidistic From what I can see it is more that representing all possible permutations of something being in or out is easily represented using binary.
– Graipher
Nov 21 '16 at 7:31
Representing the subsets as bits value is more efficient but much less readable, I'd put thei & (1 << bit) > 0
part in a function called something likeis_subset_present
or at least put a comment explaining what's happening. Using bit manipulation is fine, but with no explanation it would look bad to me in an interview, I think code should be as efficient as possible but also readable.
– ChatterOne
Nov 21 '16 at 8:20
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
4
down vote
No need to reinvent the wheel here.
You can get subsets with length r
as tuples
of a set s
by using itertools.combinations
.
Doing this for all possible subset lengths:
def subsets(s):
for cardinality in range(len(s) + 1):
yield from combinations(s, cardinality)
If you want the subsets as sets instead of tuples and within a list you can invoke the method above via:
sub_sets = [set(sub_set) for sub_set in subsets(s)]
Thanks for the answer. I like how succinct it is. I'll definitely look into itertools more in the future :)
– cycloidistic
Nov 22 '16 at 7:27
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
@janos Answer is great, but it was easier for me to think about it with one less bitwise operations.
def subsets(s):
"""
:type s: list
"""
sets =
for i in range(2**len(s)):
subset =
for j in range(len(s)):
if i & (1 << j) > 0:
subset.append(s[j])
sets.append(subset)
return sets
Explanation:
So we know there are $2^n$ subsets in a set where $n$ is the size of the set. So we loop through all those numbers: for i in range(2**len(s)):
.
This gives us a range $0 - 2^n$ which corresponds to these binary numbers (example of a set of size 3):
0 = 000
1 = 001
2 = 010
3 = 011
4 = 100
5 = 101
6 = 110
7 = 111
...
n - 1 = 0b(n-1)
As you can see, the binary representation is every subset possible where 1 means it is in the set and 0 means it is not.
Now we just need to use these indexes to find out what should be in each set.
(While under the hood the numbers are stored as binary, if you try printing them you'll see an int.)
So we'll do a nested for loop: for j in range(len(s)):
Here we do need to do a bitwise operation: i & (1 << j) > 0
where i
is the current index of the loop described earlier. j
is the index of which element in the second loop we're at.
1 << j
just converts the index to the binary representation. For example, the first element (at index 0): 1 << 0 = 001
, or the second 1 << 1 = 010
, etc.
The &
operator just makes sure the indexes match up. 000 & 101 = 0
but 100 & 101 = 100
. So anytime it is greater than 0, it means we've come across an element that belongs in our set.
Let's take the set {a, b, c}
and loop through our range. At 0, 0 & anything = 0
, so we have the empty set.
Let's skip to i = 6: 6 & (1 << 0) > 0
returns false because in binary: 110 & 001 = 0
. But the second iteration (j = 1) 6 & (1 << 1) > 0
returns true (110 & 010 = 1
). And it will for the 3rd element too. Thus giving you the subset {b, c}.
The runtime of this algorithm is $O(2^n)$ if that isn't clear! Hope this helps!
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
6
down vote
This is unnecessary:
if s == :
return [s]
You can safely remove it, the program will still work.
This step is not so great:
if subset not in sets:
sets.append(subset)
For two reasons:
- Checking if a list contains some items is an $O(n)$ operation
- Comparing sets is not free either
A more efficient solution is to count from 0
until 1 << n
, and use the bitmap of the count to decide the elements that are part of a subset.
def subsets(s):
sets =
for i in range(1 << len(s)):
subset = [s[bit] for bit in range(len(s)) if is_bit_set(i, bit)]
sets.append(subset)
return sets
def is_bit_set(num, bit):
return num & (1 << bit) > 0
That is, in a subset, each element may be either present, or not. So each element has only 2 possible states: in or out. 1 or 0. If we look at the binary representation of numbers from 0 to 2^n -1
, where n
is the number of elements, for example when n=3
, we have:
cba
0 = 000
1 = 001
2 = 010
3 = 011
4 = 100
5 = 101
6 = 110
7 = 111
There are 8 possible subsets, and the bits represent whether an element is in the subset or not.
This is the idea used by the program:
- The outer loop goes from
0
until2^n - 1
. - The inner loop goes from
0
untiln - 1
.
1 << bit
is 1 shifted to the leftbit
times.
For example, when i = 3
, that corresponds to bits 011
.
We loop from 0
until 2
, comparing i
against 001
, 010
, and 100
.
For these values, the expression i & (1 << bit)
will be evaluated as
011 & 001 = 001
, 011 & 010 = 010
, and 011 & 100 = 000
, respectively.
The first two are greater than 0, the last one is not.
Please explain in more detail what you are doing instead of the "if subset not in sets: ..." part.
– Nikolas Rieble
Nov 20 '16 at 22:20
@NikolasRieble I added more explanation about the bit shifting algorithm.
– janos
Nov 20 '16 at 22:45
@janos Thanks for the answer. Removing the first return makes sense. Also, it's good that you mentioned thatnot in
isO(n)
. That will be useful for the future. The fact that you can represent a set as a bitmap and that all the subsets are just all the numbers from 0 to len(s) is quite elegant. I never thought about it that way. I'll be sure to use more bitmaps in the future :)
– cycloidistic
Nov 21 '16 at 6:10
@cycloidistic From what I can see it is more that representing all possible permutations of something being in or out is easily represented using binary.
– Graipher
Nov 21 '16 at 7:31
Representing the subsets as bits value is more efficient but much less readable, I'd put thei & (1 << bit) > 0
part in a function called something likeis_subset_present
or at least put a comment explaining what's happening. Using bit manipulation is fine, but with no explanation it would look bad to me in an interview, I think code should be as efficient as possible but also readable.
– ChatterOne
Nov 21 '16 at 8:20
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
6
down vote
This is unnecessary:
if s == :
return [s]
You can safely remove it, the program will still work.
This step is not so great:
if subset not in sets:
sets.append(subset)
For two reasons:
- Checking if a list contains some items is an $O(n)$ operation
- Comparing sets is not free either
A more efficient solution is to count from 0
until 1 << n
, and use the bitmap of the count to decide the elements that are part of a subset.
def subsets(s):
sets =
for i in range(1 << len(s)):
subset = [s[bit] for bit in range(len(s)) if is_bit_set(i, bit)]
sets.append(subset)
return sets
def is_bit_set(num, bit):
return num & (1 << bit) > 0
That is, in a subset, each element may be either present, or not. So each element has only 2 possible states: in or out. 1 or 0. If we look at the binary representation of numbers from 0 to 2^n -1
, where n
is the number of elements, for example when n=3
, we have:
cba
0 = 000
1 = 001
2 = 010
3 = 011
4 = 100
5 = 101
6 = 110
7 = 111
There are 8 possible subsets, and the bits represent whether an element is in the subset or not.
This is the idea used by the program:
- The outer loop goes from
0
until2^n - 1
. - The inner loop goes from
0
untiln - 1
.
1 << bit
is 1 shifted to the leftbit
times.
For example, when i = 3
, that corresponds to bits 011
.
We loop from 0
until 2
, comparing i
against 001
, 010
, and 100
.
For these values, the expression i & (1 << bit)
will be evaluated as
011 & 001 = 001
, 011 & 010 = 010
, and 011 & 100 = 000
, respectively.
The first two are greater than 0, the last one is not.
Please explain in more detail what you are doing instead of the "if subset not in sets: ..." part.
– Nikolas Rieble
Nov 20 '16 at 22:20
@NikolasRieble I added more explanation about the bit shifting algorithm.
– janos
Nov 20 '16 at 22:45
@janos Thanks for the answer. Removing the first return makes sense. Also, it's good that you mentioned thatnot in
isO(n)
. That will be useful for the future. The fact that you can represent a set as a bitmap and that all the subsets are just all the numbers from 0 to len(s) is quite elegant. I never thought about it that way. I'll be sure to use more bitmaps in the future :)
– cycloidistic
Nov 21 '16 at 6:10
@cycloidistic From what I can see it is more that representing all possible permutations of something being in or out is easily represented using binary.
– Graipher
Nov 21 '16 at 7:31
Representing the subsets as bits value is more efficient but much less readable, I'd put thei & (1 << bit) > 0
part in a function called something likeis_subset_present
or at least put a comment explaining what's happening. Using bit manipulation is fine, but with no explanation it would look bad to me in an interview, I think code should be as efficient as possible but also readable.
– ChatterOne
Nov 21 '16 at 8:20
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
6
down vote
up vote
6
down vote
This is unnecessary:
if s == :
return [s]
You can safely remove it, the program will still work.
This step is not so great:
if subset not in sets:
sets.append(subset)
For two reasons:
- Checking if a list contains some items is an $O(n)$ operation
- Comparing sets is not free either
A more efficient solution is to count from 0
until 1 << n
, and use the bitmap of the count to decide the elements that are part of a subset.
def subsets(s):
sets =
for i in range(1 << len(s)):
subset = [s[bit] for bit in range(len(s)) if is_bit_set(i, bit)]
sets.append(subset)
return sets
def is_bit_set(num, bit):
return num & (1 << bit) > 0
That is, in a subset, each element may be either present, or not. So each element has only 2 possible states: in or out. 1 or 0. If we look at the binary representation of numbers from 0 to 2^n -1
, where n
is the number of elements, for example when n=3
, we have:
cba
0 = 000
1 = 001
2 = 010
3 = 011
4 = 100
5 = 101
6 = 110
7 = 111
There are 8 possible subsets, and the bits represent whether an element is in the subset or not.
This is the idea used by the program:
- The outer loop goes from
0
until2^n - 1
. - The inner loop goes from
0
untiln - 1
.
1 << bit
is 1 shifted to the leftbit
times.
For example, when i = 3
, that corresponds to bits 011
.
We loop from 0
until 2
, comparing i
against 001
, 010
, and 100
.
For these values, the expression i & (1 << bit)
will be evaluated as
011 & 001 = 001
, 011 & 010 = 010
, and 011 & 100 = 000
, respectively.
The first two are greater than 0, the last one is not.
This is unnecessary:
if s == :
return [s]
You can safely remove it, the program will still work.
This step is not so great:
if subset not in sets:
sets.append(subset)
For two reasons:
- Checking if a list contains some items is an $O(n)$ operation
- Comparing sets is not free either
A more efficient solution is to count from 0
until 1 << n
, and use the bitmap of the count to decide the elements that are part of a subset.
def subsets(s):
sets =
for i in range(1 << len(s)):
subset = [s[bit] for bit in range(len(s)) if is_bit_set(i, bit)]
sets.append(subset)
return sets
def is_bit_set(num, bit):
return num & (1 << bit) > 0
That is, in a subset, each element may be either present, or not. So each element has only 2 possible states: in or out. 1 or 0. If we look at the binary representation of numbers from 0 to 2^n -1
, where n
is the number of elements, for example when n=3
, we have:
cba
0 = 000
1 = 001
2 = 010
3 = 011
4 = 100
5 = 101
6 = 110
7 = 111
There are 8 possible subsets, and the bits represent whether an element is in the subset or not.
This is the idea used by the program:
- The outer loop goes from
0
until2^n - 1
. - The inner loop goes from
0
untiln - 1
.
1 << bit
is 1 shifted to the leftbit
times.
For example, when i = 3
, that corresponds to bits 011
.
We loop from 0
until 2
, comparing i
against 001
, 010
, and 100
.
For these values, the expression i & (1 << bit)
will be evaluated as
011 & 001 = 001
, 011 & 010 = 010
, and 011 & 100 = 000
, respectively.
The first two are greater than 0, the last one is not.
edited Nov 21 '16 at 8:46
answered Nov 20 '16 at 22:04
janos
96.6k12124350
96.6k12124350
Please explain in more detail what you are doing instead of the "if subset not in sets: ..." part.
– Nikolas Rieble
Nov 20 '16 at 22:20
@NikolasRieble I added more explanation about the bit shifting algorithm.
– janos
Nov 20 '16 at 22:45
@janos Thanks for the answer. Removing the first return makes sense. Also, it's good that you mentioned thatnot in
isO(n)
. That will be useful for the future. The fact that you can represent a set as a bitmap and that all the subsets are just all the numbers from 0 to len(s) is quite elegant. I never thought about it that way. I'll be sure to use more bitmaps in the future :)
– cycloidistic
Nov 21 '16 at 6:10
@cycloidistic From what I can see it is more that representing all possible permutations of something being in or out is easily represented using binary.
– Graipher
Nov 21 '16 at 7:31
Representing the subsets as bits value is more efficient but much less readable, I'd put thei & (1 << bit) > 0
part in a function called something likeis_subset_present
or at least put a comment explaining what's happening. Using bit manipulation is fine, but with no explanation it would look bad to me in an interview, I think code should be as efficient as possible but also readable.
– ChatterOne
Nov 21 '16 at 8:20
|
show 1 more comment
Please explain in more detail what you are doing instead of the "if subset not in sets: ..." part.
– Nikolas Rieble
Nov 20 '16 at 22:20
@NikolasRieble I added more explanation about the bit shifting algorithm.
– janos
Nov 20 '16 at 22:45
@janos Thanks for the answer. Removing the first return makes sense. Also, it's good that you mentioned thatnot in
isO(n)
. That will be useful for the future. The fact that you can represent a set as a bitmap and that all the subsets are just all the numbers from 0 to len(s) is quite elegant. I never thought about it that way. I'll be sure to use more bitmaps in the future :)
– cycloidistic
Nov 21 '16 at 6:10
@cycloidistic From what I can see it is more that representing all possible permutations of something being in or out is easily represented using binary.
– Graipher
Nov 21 '16 at 7:31
Representing the subsets as bits value is more efficient but much less readable, I'd put thei & (1 << bit) > 0
part in a function called something likeis_subset_present
or at least put a comment explaining what's happening. Using bit manipulation is fine, but with no explanation it would look bad to me in an interview, I think code should be as efficient as possible but also readable.
– ChatterOne
Nov 21 '16 at 8:20
Please explain in more detail what you are doing instead of the "if subset not in sets: ..." part.
– Nikolas Rieble
Nov 20 '16 at 22:20
Please explain in more detail what you are doing instead of the "if subset not in sets: ..." part.
– Nikolas Rieble
Nov 20 '16 at 22:20
@NikolasRieble I added more explanation about the bit shifting algorithm.
– janos
Nov 20 '16 at 22:45
@NikolasRieble I added more explanation about the bit shifting algorithm.
– janos
Nov 20 '16 at 22:45
@janos Thanks for the answer. Removing the first return makes sense. Also, it's good that you mentioned that
not in
is O(n)
. That will be useful for the future. The fact that you can represent a set as a bitmap and that all the subsets are just all the numbers from 0 to len(s) is quite elegant. I never thought about it that way. I'll be sure to use more bitmaps in the future :)– cycloidistic
Nov 21 '16 at 6:10
@janos Thanks for the answer. Removing the first return makes sense. Also, it's good that you mentioned that
not in
is O(n)
. That will be useful for the future. The fact that you can represent a set as a bitmap and that all the subsets are just all the numbers from 0 to len(s) is quite elegant. I never thought about it that way. I'll be sure to use more bitmaps in the future :)– cycloidistic
Nov 21 '16 at 6:10
@cycloidistic From what I can see it is more that representing all possible permutations of something being in or out is easily represented using binary.
– Graipher
Nov 21 '16 at 7:31
@cycloidistic From what I can see it is more that representing all possible permutations of something being in or out is easily represented using binary.
– Graipher
Nov 21 '16 at 7:31
Representing the subsets as bits value is more efficient but much less readable, I'd put the
i & (1 << bit) > 0
part in a function called something like is_subset_present
or at least put a comment explaining what's happening. Using bit manipulation is fine, but with no explanation it would look bad to me in an interview, I think code should be as efficient as possible but also readable.– ChatterOne
Nov 21 '16 at 8:20
Representing the subsets as bits value is more efficient but much less readable, I'd put the
i & (1 << bit) > 0
part in a function called something like is_subset_present
or at least put a comment explaining what's happening. Using bit manipulation is fine, but with no explanation it would look bad to me in an interview, I think code should be as efficient as possible but also readable.– ChatterOne
Nov 21 '16 at 8:20
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
4
down vote
No need to reinvent the wheel here.
You can get subsets with length r
as tuples
of a set s
by using itertools.combinations
.
Doing this for all possible subset lengths:
def subsets(s):
for cardinality in range(len(s) + 1):
yield from combinations(s, cardinality)
If you want the subsets as sets instead of tuples and within a list you can invoke the method above via:
sub_sets = [set(sub_set) for sub_set in subsets(s)]
Thanks for the answer. I like how succinct it is. I'll definitely look into itertools more in the future :)
– cycloidistic
Nov 22 '16 at 7:27
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
No need to reinvent the wheel here.
You can get subsets with length r
as tuples
of a set s
by using itertools.combinations
.
Doing this for all possible subset lengths:
def subsets(s):
for cardinality in range(len(s) + 1):
yield from combinations(s, cardinality)
If you want the subsets as sets instead of tuples and within a list you can invoke the method above via:
sub_sets = [set(sub_set) for sub_set in subsets(s)]
Thanks for the answer. I like how succinct it is. I'll definitely look into itertools more in the future :)
– cycloidistic
Nov 22 '16 at 7:27
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
up vote
4
down vote
No need to reinvent the wheel here.
You can get subsets with length r
as tuples
of a set s
by using itertools.combinations
.
Doing this for all possible subset lengths:
def subsets(s):
for cardinality in range(len(s) + 1):
yield from combinations(s, cardinality)
If you want the subsets as sets instead of tuples and within a list you can invoke the method above via:
sub_sets = [set(sub_set) for sub_set in subsets(s)]
No need to reinvent the wheel here.
You can get subsets with length r
as tuples
of a set s
by using itertools.combinations
.
Doing this for all possible subset lengths:
def subsets(s):
for cardinality in range(len(s) + 1):
yield from combinations(s, cardinality)
If you want the subsets as sets instead of tuples and within a list you can invoke the method above via:
sub_sets = [set(sub_set) for sub_set in subsets(s)]
answered Nov 21 '16 at 8:53
Richard Neumann
1,856722
1,856722
Thanks for the answer. I like how succinct it is. I'll definitely look into itertools more in the future :)
– cycloidistic
Nov 22 '16 at 7:27
add a comment |
Thanks for the answer. I like how succinct it is. I'll definitely look into itertools more in the future :)
– cycloidistic
Nov 22 '16 at 7:27
Thanks for the answer. I like how succinct it is. I'll definitely look into itertools more in the future :)
– cycloidistic
Nov 22 '16 at 7:27
Thanks for the answer. I like how succinct it is. I'll definitely look into itertools more in the future :)
– cycloidistic
Nov 22 '16 at 7:27
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
@janos Answer is great, but it was easier for me to think about it with one less bitwise operations.
def subsets(s):
"""
:type s: list
"""
sets =
for i in range(2**len(s)):
subset =
for j in range(len(s)):
if i & (1 << j) > 0:
subset.append(s[j])
sets.append(subset)
return sets
Explanation:
So we know there are $2^n$ subsets in a set where $n$ is the size of the set. So we loop through all those numbers: for i in range(2**len(s)):
.
This gives us a range $0 - 2^n$ which corresponds to these binary numbers (example of a set of size 3):
0 = 000
1 = 001
2 = 010
3 = 011
4 = 100
5 = 101
6 = 110
7 = 111
...
n - 1 = 0b(n-1)
As you can see, the binary representation is every subset possible where 1 means it is in the set and 0 means it is not.
Now we just need to use these indexes to find out what should be in each set.
(While under the hood the numbers are stored as binary, if you try printing them you'll see an int.)
So we'll do a nested for loop: for j in range(len(s)):
Here we do need to do a bitwise operation: i & (1 << j) > 0
where i
is the current index of the loop described earlier. j
is the index of which element in the second loop we're at.
1 << j
just converts the index to the binary representation. For example, the first element (at index 0): 1 << 0 = 001
, or the second 1 << 1 = 010
, etc.
The &
operator just makes sure the indexes match up. 000 & 101 = 0
but 100 & 101 = 100
. So anytime it is greater than 0, it means we've come across an element that belongs in our set.
Let's take the set {a, b, c}
and loop through our range. At 0, 0 & anything = 0
, so we have the empty set.
Let's skip to i = 6: 6 & (1 << 0) > 0
returns false because in binary: 110 & 001 = 0
. But the second iteration (j = 1) 6 & (1 << 1) > 0
returns true (110 & 010 = 1
). And it will for the 3rd element too. Thus giving you the subset {b, c}.
The runtime of this algorithm is $O(2^n)$ if that isn't clear! Hope this helps!
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
@janos Answer is great, but it was easier for me to think about it with one less bitwise operations.
def subsets(s):
"""
:type s: list
"""
sets =
for i in range(2**len(s)):
subset =
for j in range(len(s)):
if i & (1 << j) > 0:
subset.append(s[j])
sets.append(subset)
return sets
Explanation:
So we know there are $2^n$ subsets in a set where $n$ is the size of the set. So we loop through all those numbers: for i in range(2**len(s)):
.
This gives us a range $0 - 2^n$ which corresponds to these binary numbers (example of a set of size 3):
0 = 000
1 = 001
2 = 010
3 = 011
4 = 100
5 = 101
6 = 110
7 = 111
...
n - 1 = 0b(n-1)
As you can see, the binary representation is every subset possible where 1 means it is in the set and 0 means it is not.
Now we just need to use these indexes to find out what should be in each set.
(While under the hood the numbers are stored as binary, if you try printing them you'll see an int.)
So we'll do a nested for loop: for j in range(len(s)):
Here we do need to do a bitwise operation: i & (1 << j) > 0
where i
is the current index of the loop described earlier. j
is the index of which element in the second loop we're at.
1 << j
just converts the index to the binary representation. For example, the first element (at index 0): 1 << 0 = 001
, or the second 1 << 1 = 010
, etc.
The &
operator just makes sure the indexes match up. 000 & 101 = 0
but 100 & 101 = 100
. So anytime it is greater than 0, it means we've come across an element that belongs in our set.
Let's take the set {a, b, c}
and loop through our range. At 0, 0 & anything = 0
, so we have the empty set.
Let's skip to i = 6: 6 & (1 << 0) > 0
returns false because in binary: 110 & 001 = 0
. But the second iteration (j = 1) 6 & (1 << 1) > 0
returns true (110 & 010 = 1
). And it will for the 3rd element too. Thus giving you the subset {b, c}.
The runtime of this algorithm is $O(2^n)$ if that isn't clear! Hope this helps!
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
up vote
4
down vote
@janos Answer is great, but it was easier for me to think about it with one less bitwise operations.
def subsets(s):
"""
:type s: list
"""
sets =
for i in range(2**len(s)):
subset =
for j in range(len(s)):
if i & (1 << j) > 0:
subset.append(s[j])
sets.append(subset)
return sets
Explanation:
So we know there are $2^n$ subsets in a set where $n$ is the size of the set. So we loop through all those numbers: for i in range(2**len(s)):
.
This gives us a range $0 - 2^n$ which corresponds to these binary numbers (example of a set of size 3):
0 = 000
1 = 001
2 = 010
3 = 011
4 = 100
5 = 101
6 = 110
7 = 111
...
n - 1 = 0b(n-1)
As you can see, the binary representation is every subset possible where 1 means it is in the set and 0 means it is not.
Now we just need to use these indexes to find out what should be in each set.
(While under the hood the numbers are stored as binary, if you try printing them you'll see an int.)
So we'll do a nested for loop: for j in range(len(s)):
Here we do need to do a bitwise operation: i & (1 << j) > 0
where i
is the current index of the loop described earlier. j
is the index of which element in the second loop we're at.
1 << j
just converts the index to the binary representation. For example, the first element (at index 0): 1 << 0 = 001
, or the second 1 << 1 = 010
, etc.
The &
operator just makes sure the indexes match up. 000 & 101 = 0
but 100 & 101 = 100
. So anytime it is greater than 0, it means we've come across an element that belongs in our set.
Let's take the set {a, b, c}
and loop through our range. At 0, 0 & anything = 0
, so we have the empty set.
Let's skip to i = 6: 6 & (1 << 0) > 0
returns false because in binary: 110 & 001 = 0
. But the second iteration (j = 1) 6 & (1 << 1) > 0
returns true (110 & 010 = 1
). And it will for the 3rd element too. Thus giving you the subset {b, c}.
The runtime of this algorithm is $O(2^n)$ if that isn't clear! Hope this helps!
@janos Answer is great, but it was easier for me to think about it with one less bitwise operations.
def subsets(s):
"""
:type s: list
"""
sets =
for i in range(2**len(s)):
subset =
for j in range(len(s)):
if i & (1 << j) > 0:
subset.append(s[j])
sets.append(subset)
return sets
Explanation:
So we know there are $2^n$ subsets in a set where $n$ is the size of the set. So we loop through all those numbers: for i in range(2**len(s)):
.
This gives us a range $0 - 2^n$ which corresponds to these binary numbers (example of a set of size 3):
0 = 000
1 = 001
2 = 010
3 = 011
4 = 100
5 = 101
6 = 110
7 = 111
...
n - 1 = 0b(n-1)
As you can see, the binary representation is every subset possible where 1 means it is in the set and 0 means it is not.
Now we just need to use these indexes to find out what should be in each set.
(While under the hood the numbers are stored as binary, if you try printing them you'll see an int.)
So we'll do a nested for loop: for j in range(len(s)):
Here we do need to do a bitwise operation: i & (1 << j) > 0
where i
is the current index of the loop described earlier. j
is the index of which element in the second loop we're at.
1 << j
just converts the index to the binary representation. For example, the first element (at index 0): 1 << 0 = 001
, or the second 1 << 1 = 010
, etc.
The &
operator just makes sure the indexes match up. 000 & 101 = 0
but 100 & 101 = 100
. So anytime it is greater than 0, it means we've come across an element that belongs in our set.
Let's take the set {a, b, c}
and loop through our range. At 0, 0 & anything = 0
, so we have the empty set.
Let's skip to i = 6: 6 & (1 << 0) > 0
returns false because in binary: 110 & 001 = 0
. But the second iteration (j = 1) 6 & (1 << 1) > 0
returns true (110 & 010 = 1
). And it will for the 3rd element too. Thus giving you the subset {b, c}.
The runtime of this algorithm is $O(2^n)$ if that isn't clear! Hope this helps!
edited Nov 23 at 5:54
Sᴀᴍ Onᴇᴌᴀ
7,84561749
7,84561749
answered Nov 22 at 19:27
Shahaed
413
413
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f147633%2fget-subsets-of-a-set-given-as-a-list%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown