Local hostname not working without the trailing dot
I noticed all my local hostnames have a trailing dot at the end when I use some LAN scan tool on my Android phone. And without it, I can't get a ping to work from my Windows desktop (it works fine from my Linux VMs):
C:Usersdnll>ping router
Ping request could not find host router. Please check the name and try again.
C:Usersdnll>ping router.
Pinging router [192.168.1.1] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Ping statistics for 192.168.1.1:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms
This is more obvious when trying to reach my router web UI as I need to enter http://router./
since http://router/
won't work. I'm using DD-WRT with dnsmasq enabled, not sure if that could be the issue. I'd prefer the hostnames to be reachable without the dot from my Windows PC.
I tried disabling the local DNS without much success.
Here is ipconfig /all
from my desktop:
C:Usersdnll>ipconfig /all
Windows IP Configuration
Host Name . . . . . . . . . . . . : desktop
Primary Dns Suffix . . . . . . . :
Node Type . . . . . . . . . . . . : Hybrid
IP Routing Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
WINS Proxy Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
Ethernet adapter Ethernet:
Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Intel(R) Ethernet Connection (5) I219-V
Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 70-4D-7B-67-7C-FD
DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : Yes
Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
IPv4 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.205(Preferred)
Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
Lease Obtained. . . . . . . . . . : December 12, 2018 18:11:50
Lease Expires . . . . . . . . . . : December 17, 2018 00:21:37
Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.1
DHCP Server . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.1
DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.1
NetBIOS over Tcpip. . . . . . . . : Enabled
There is nothing really special about my Windows configuration that I know of. I'm not using a domain, at least not that I know of (and I tried a ping to router.local
or router.mydomain
without success, just to be sure).
What's wrong?
networking router dns dd-wrt dnsmasq
add a comment |
I noticed all my local hostnames have a trailing dot at the end when I use some LAN scan tool on my Android phone. And without it, I can't get a ping to work from my Windows desktop (it works fine from my Linux VMs):
C:Usersdnll>ping router
Ping request could not find host router. Please check the name and try again.
C:Usersdnll>ping router.
Pinging router [192.168.1.1] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Ping statistics for 192.168.1.1:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms
This is more obvious when trying to reach my router web UI as I need to enter http://router./
since http://router/
won't work. I'm using DD-WRT with dnsmasq enabled, not sure if that could be the issue. I'd prefer the hostnames to be reachable without the dot from my Windows PC.
I tried disabling the local DNS without much success.
Here is ipconfig /all
from my desktop:
C:Usersdnll>ipconfig /all
Windows IP Configuration
Host Name . . . . . . . . . . . . : desktop
Primary Dns Suffix . . . . . . . :
Node Type . . . . . . . . . . . . : Hybrid
IP Routing Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
WINS Proxy Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
Ethernet adapter Ethernet:
Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Intel(R) Ethernet Connection (5) I219-V
Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 70-4D-7B-67-7C-FD
DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : Yes
Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
IPv4 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.205(Preferred)
Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
Lease Obtained. . . . . . . . . . : December 12, 2018 18:11:50
Lease Expires . . . . . . . . . . : December 17, 2018 00:21:37
Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.1
DHCP Server . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.1
DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.1
NetBIOS over Tcpip. . . . . . . . : Enabled
There is nothing really special about my Windows configuration that I know of. I'm not using a domain, at least not that I know of (and I tried a ping to router.local
or router.mydomain
without success, just to be sure).
What's wrong?
networking router dns dd-wrt dnsmasq
What Windows version are you using?
– Binarus
Dec 23 '18 at 8:38
Tried on 3 different Windows desktops so far, all Windows 10.
– dnLL
Dec 23 '18 at 11:54
add a comment |
I noticed all my local hostnames have a trailing dot at the end when I use some LAN scan tool on my Android phone. And without it, I can't get a ping to work from my Windows desktop (it works fine from my Linux VMs):
C:Usersdnll>ping router
Ping request could not find host router. Please check the name and try again.
C:Usersdnll>ping router.
Pinging router [192.168.1.1] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Ping statistics for 192.168.1.1:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms
This is more obvious when trying to reach my router web UI as I need to enter http://router./
since http://router/
won't work. I'm using DD-WRT with dnsmasq enabled, not sure if that could be the issue. I'd prefer the hostnames to be reachable without the dot from my Windows PC.
I tried disabling the local DNS without much success.
Here is ipconfig /all
from my desktop:
C:Usersdnll>ipconfig /all
Windows IP Configuration
Host Name . . . . . . . . . . . . : desktop
Primary Dns Suffix . . . . . . . :
Node Type . . . . . . . . . . . . : Hybrid
IP Routing Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
WINS Proxy Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
Ethernet adapter Ethernet:
Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Intel(R) Ethernet Connection (5) I219-V
Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 70-4D-7B-67-7C-FD
DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : Yes
Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
IPv4 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.205(Preferred)
Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
Lease Obtained. . . . . . . . . . : December 12, 2018 18:11:50
Lease Expires . . . . . . . . . . : December 17, 2018 00:21:37
Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.1
DHCP Server . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.1
DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.1
NetBIOS over Tcpip. . . . . . . . : Enabled
There is nothing really special about my Windows configuration that I know of. I'm not using a domain, at least not that I know of (and I tried a ping to router.local
or router.mydomain
without success, just to be sure).
What's wrong?
networking router dns dd-wrt dnsmasq
I noticed all my local hostnames have a trailing dot at the end when I use some LAN scan tool on my Android phone. And without it, I can't get a ping to work from my Windows desktop (it works fine from my Linux VMs):
C:Usersdnll>ping router
Ping request could not find host router. Please check the name and try again.
C:Usersdnll>ping router.
Pinging router [192.168.1.1] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Ping statistics for 192.168.1.1:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms
This is more obvious when trying to reach my router web UI as I need to enter http://router./
since http://router/
won't work. I'm using DD-WRT with dnsmasq enabled, not sure if that could be the issue. I'd prefer the hostnames to be reachable without the dot from my Windows PC.
I tried disabling the local DNS without much success.
Here is ipconfig /all
from my desktop:
C:Usersdnll>ipconfig /all
Windows IP Configuration
Host Name . . . . . . . . . . . . : desktop
Primary Dns Suffix . . . . . . . :
Node Type . . . . . . . . . . . . : Hybrid
IP Routing Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
WINS Proxy Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
Ethernet adapter Ethernet:
Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Intel(R) Ethernet Connection (5) I219-V
Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 70-4D-7B-67-7C-FD
DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : Yes
Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
IPv4 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.205(Preferred)
Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
Lease Obtained. . . . . . . . . . : December 12, 2018 18:11:50
Lease Expires . . . . . . . . . . : December 17, 2018 00:21:37
Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.1
DHCP Server . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.1
DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.1
NetBIOS over Tcpip. . . . . . . . : Enabled
There is nothing really special about my Windows configuration that I know of. I'm not using a domain, at least not that I know of (and I tried a ping to router.local
or router.mydomain
without success, just to be sure).
What's wrong?
networking router dns dd-wrt dnsmasq
networking router dns dd-wrt dnsmasq
asked Dec 16 '18 at 14:42
dnLLdnLL
283415
283415
What Windows version are you using?
– Binarus
Dec 23 '18 at 8:38
Tried on 3 different Windows desktops so far, all Windows 10.
– dnLL
Dec 23 '18 at 11:54
add a comment |
What Windows version are you using?
– Binarus
Dec 23 '18 at 8:38
Tried on 3 different Windows desktops so far, all Windows 10.
– dnLL
Dec 23 '18 at 11:54
What Windows version are you using?
– Binarus
Dec 23 '18 at 8:38
What Windows version are you using?
– Binarus
Dec 23 '18 at 8:38
Tried on 3 different Windows desktops so far, all Windows 10.
– dnLL
Dec 23 '18 at 11:54
Tried on 3 different Windows desktops so far, all Windows 10.
– dnLL
Dec 23 '18 at 11:54
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
The dot at the end is required to force a DNS lookup. Without it, Windows may try
first other methods such as NETBIOS or the hosts
file,
which it will not try if the dot is present.
When you put a dot, you are saying the host-name is fully qualified,
otherwise it will add your DNS suffix.
The final "dot" is always implied in DNS even if it's not specified.
From the DD-WRT forum article
Can't resolve hostname but can resolve hostname. (with a . ):
This is typical DNS behavior.
The "trailing dot" signifies a fully qualified domain name (FQDN).
Without the dot, the name you are trying to ping is ambiguous (having
several possible meanings or interpretations).
You can help prevent the use of trailing dot by specifying a LAN
domain of (for example) "local" in the router. Then release/renew DHCP
on the client.
ping stan.local
ping stan
So if your router's host-name would be router.local.
, and your DNS resolver
would have a search path of local
, when doing a lookup for router
the DNS client will automatically append the .local.
and then
successfully resolve the address.
5
Except please don’t use.local
, it’s reserved for Multicast DNS. Ideally, you’d use a domain you actually own.
– Daniel B
Dec 16 '18 at 15:05
I tried local, rebooted my router, did aipconfig /release
and/renew
on my desktop andping router.local
still doesn't work (and the dot is still needed). So I changed it to my own domain name because I do happen to have one (which shouldn't be necessary to make my hostnames working, really) and that didn't change anything either.
– dnLL
Dec 16 '18 at 15:16
As the above didn't help, I don't think that this is a DD-WRT problem but a problem with dnsmasq. This post might help. But I can't help asking why do you need dnsmasq when not working with a large number of computers. For running on a local network, editing the hosts file is easier.
– harrymc
Dec 16 '18 at 16:53
@harrymc I don't "need" dnsmasq per se, just thought it might help improve performances. I'm not dealing with a large number of computers per se but I do have a server with a ton of VMs so generally I have over 15 different IPs connected to the LAN.
– dnLL
Dec 16 '18 at 16:58
I added a paragraph which might help in configuring router name and Windows domain in a way that works.
– harrymc
Dec 19 '18 at 9:43
|
show 6 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "3"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1385021%2flocal-hostname-not-working-without-the-trailing-dot%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The dot at the end is required to force a DNS lookup. Without it, Windows may try
first other methods such as NETBIOS or the hosts
file,
which it will not try if the dot is present.
When you put a dot, you are saying the host-name is fully qualified,
otherwise it will add your DNS suffix.
The final "dot" is always implied in DNS even if it's not specified.
From the DD-WRT forum article
Can't resolve hostname but can resolve hostname. (with a . ):
This is typical DNS behavior.
The "trailing dot" signifies a fully qualified domain name (FQDN).
Without the dot, the name you are trying to ping is ambiguous (having
several possible meanings or interpretations).
You can help prevent the use of trailing dot by specifying a LAN
domain of (for example) "local" in the router. Then release/renew DHCP
on the client.
ping stan.local
ping stan
So if your router's host-name would be router.local.
, and your DNS resolver
would have a search path of local
, when doing a lookup for router
the DNS client will automatically append the .local.
and then
successfully resolve the address.
5
Except please don’t use.local
, it’s reserved for Multicast DNS. Ideally, you’d use a domain you actually own.
– Daniel B
Dec 16 '18 at 15:05
I tried local, rebooted my router, did aipconfig /release
and/renew
on my desktop andping router.local
still doesn't work (and the dot is still needed). So I changed it to my own domain name because I do happen to have one (which shouldn't be necessary to make my hostnames working, really) and that didn't change anything either.
– dnLL
Dec 16 '18 at 15:16
As the above didn't help, I don't think that this is a DD-WRT problem but a problem with dnsmasq. This post might help. But I can't help asking why do you need dnsmasq when not working with a large number of computers. For running on a local network, editing the hosts file is easier.
– harrymc
Dec 16 '18 at 16:53
@harrymc I don't "need" dnsmasq per se, just thought it might help improve performances. I'm not dealing with a large number of computers per se but I do have a server with a ton of VMs so generally I have over 15 different IPs connected to the LAN.
– dnLL
Dec 16 '18 at 16:58
I added a paragraph which might help in configuring router name and Windows domain in a way that works.
– harrymc
Dec 19 '18 at 9:43
|
show 6 more comments
The dot at the end is required to force a DNS lookup. Without it, Windows may try
first other methods such as NETBIOS or the hosts
file,
which it will not try if the dot is present.
When you put a dot, you are saying the host-name is fully qualified,
otherwise it will add your DNS suffix.
The final "dot" is always implied in DNS even if it's not specified.
From the DD-WRT forum article
Can't resolve hostname but can resolve hostname. (with a . ):
This is typical DNS behavior.
The "trailing dot" signifies a fully qualified domain name (FQDN).
Without the dot, the name you are trying to ping is ambiguous (having
several possible meanings or interpretations).
You can help prevent the use of trailing dot by specifying a LAN
domain of (for example) "local" in the router. Then release/renew DHCP
on the client.
ping stan.local
ping stan
So if your router's host-name would be router.local.
, and your DNS resolver
would have a search path of local
, when doing a lookup for router
the DNS client will automatically append the .local.
and then
successfully resolve the address.
5
Except please don’t use.local
, it’s reserved for Multicast DNS. Ideally, you’d use a domain you actually own.
– Daniel B
Dec 16 '18 at 15:05
I tried local, rebooted my router, did aipconfig /release
and/renew
on my desktop andping router.local
still doesn't work (and the dot is still needed). So I changed it to my own domain name because I do happen to have one (which shouldn't be necessary to make my hostnames working, really) and that didn't change anything either.
– dnLL
Dec 16 '18 at 15:16
As the above didn't help, I don't think that this is a DD-WRT problem but a problem with dnsmasq. This post might help. But I can't help asking why do you need dnsmasq when not working with a large number of computers. For running on a local network, editing the hosts file is easier.
– harrymc
Dec 16 '18 at 16:53
@harrymc I don't "need" dnsmasq per se, just thought it might help improve performances. I'm not dealing with a large number of computers per se but I do have a server with a ton of VMs so generally I have over 15 different IPs connected to the LAN.
– dnLL
Dec 16 '18 at 16:58
I added a paragraph which might help in configuring router name and Windows domain in a way that works.
– harrymc
Dec 19 '18 at 9:43
|
show 6 more comments
The dot at the end is required to force a DNS lookup. Without it, Windows may try
first other methods such as NETBIOS or the hosts
file,
which it will not try if the dot is present.
When you put a dot, you are saying the host-name is fully qualified,
otherwise it will add your DNS suffix.
The final "dot" is always implied in DNS even if it's not specified.
From the DD-WRT forum article
Can't resolve hostname but can resolve hostname. (with a . ):
This is typical DNS behavior.
The "trailing dot" signifies a fully qualified domain name (FQDN).
Without the dot, the name you are trying to ping is ambiguous (having
several possible meanings or interpretations).
You can help prevent the use of trailing dot by specifying a LAN
domain of (for example) "local" in the router. Then release/renew DHCP
on the client.
ping stan.local
ping stan
So if your router's host-name would be router.local.
, and your DNS resolver
would have a search path of local
, when doing a lookup for router
the DNS client will automatically append the .local.
and then
successfully resolve the address.
The dot at the end is required to force a DNS lookup. Without it, Windows may try
first other methods such as NETBIOS or the hosts
file,
which it will not try if the dot is present.
When you put a dot, you are saying the host-name is fully qualified,
otherwise it will add your DNS suffix.
The final "dot" is always implied in DNS even if it's not specified.
From the DD-WRT forum article
Can't resolve hostname but can resolve hostname. (with a . ):
This is typical DNS behavior.
The "trailing dot" signifies a fully qualified domain name (FQDN).
Without the dot, the name you are trying to ping is ambiguous (having
several possible meanings or interpretations).
You can help prevent the use of trailing dot by specifying a LAN
domain of (for example) "local" in the router. Then release/renew DHCP
on the client.
ping stan.local
ping stan
So if your router's host-name would be router.local.
, and your DNS resolver
would have a search path of local
, when doing a lookup for router
the DNS client will automatically append the .local.
and then
successfully resolve the address.
edited Dec 19 '18 at 9:41
answered Dec 16 '18 at 15:03
harrymcharrymc
255k14266566
255k14266566
5
Except please don’t use.local
, it’s reserved for Multicast DNS. Ideally, you’d use a domain you actually own.
– Daniel B
Dec 16 '18 at 15:05
I tried local, rebooted my router, did aipconfig /release
and/renew
on my desktop andping router.local
still doesn't work (and the dot is still needed). So I changed it to my own domain name because I do happen to have one (which shouldn't be necessary to make my hostnames working, really) and that didn't change anything either.
– dnLL
Dec 16 '18 at 15:16
As the above didn't help, I don't think that this is a DD-WRT problem but a problem with dnsmasq. This post might help. But I can't help asking why do you need dnsmasq when not working with a large number of computers. For running on a local network, editing the hosts file is easier.
– harrymc
Dec 16 '18 at 16:53
@harrymc I don't "need" dnsmasq per se, just thought it might help improve performances. I'm not dealing with a large number of computers per se but I do have a server with a ton of VMs so generally I have over 15 different IPs connected to the LAN.
– dnLL
Dec 16 '18 at 16:58
I added a paragraph which might help in configuring router name and Windows domain in a way that works.
– harrymc
Dec 19 '18 at 9:43
|
show 6 more comments
5
Except please don’t use.local
, it’s reserved for Multicast DNS. Ideally, you’d use a domain you actually own.
– Daniel B
Dec 16 '18 at 15:05
I tried local, rebooted my router, did aipconfig /release
and/renew
on my desktop andping router.local
still doesn't work (and the dot is still needed). So I changed it to my own domain name because I do happen to have one (which shouldn't be necessary to make my hostnames working, really) and that didn't change anything either.
– dnLL
Dec 16 '18 at 15:16
As the above didn't help, I don't think that this is a DD-WRT problem but a problem with dnsmasq. This post might help. But I can't help asking why do you need dnsmasq when not working with a large number of computers. For running on a local network, editing the hosts file is easier.
– harrymc
Dec 16 '18 at 16:53
@harrymc I don't "need" dnsmasq per se, just thought it might help improve performances. I'm not dealing with a large number of computers per se but I do have a server with a ton of VMs so generally I have over 15 different IPs connected to the LAN.
– dnLL
Dec 16 '18 at 16:58
I added a paragraph which might help in configuring router name and Windows domain in a way that works.
– harrymc
Dec 19 '18 at 9:43
5
5
Except please don’t use
.local
, it’s reserved for Multicast DNS. Ideally, you’d use a domain you actually own.– Daniel B
Dec 16 '18 at 15:05
Except please don’t use
.local
, it’s reserved for Multicast DNS. Ideally, you’d use a domain you actually own.– Daniel B
Dec 16 '18 at 15:05
I tried local, rebooted my router, did a
ipconfig /release
and /renew
on my desktop and ping router.local
still doesn't work (and the dot is still needed). So I changed it to my own domain name because I do happen to have one (which shouldn't be necessary to make my hostnames working, really) and that didn't change anything either.– dnLL
Dec 16 '18 at 15:16
I tried local, rebooted my router, did a
ipconfig /release
and /renew
on my desktop and ping router.local
still doesn't work (and the dot is still needed). So I changed it to my own domain name because I do happen to have one (which shouldn't be necessary to make my hostnames working, really) and that didn't change anything either.– dnLL
Dec 16 '18 at 15:16
As the above didn't help, I don't think that this is a DD-WRT problem but a problem with dnsmasq. This post might help. But I can't help asking why do you need dnsmasq when not working with a large number of computers. For running on a local network, editing the hosts file is easier.
– harrymc
Dec 16 '18 at 16:53
As the above didn't help, I don't think that this is a DD-WRT problem but a problem with dnsmasq. This post might help. But I can't help asking why do you need dnsmasq when not working with a large number of computers. For running on a local network, editing the hosts file is easier.
– harrymc
Dec 16 '18 at 16:53
@harrymc I don't "need" dnsmasq per se, just thought it might help improve performances. I'm not dealing with a large number of computers per se but I do have a server with a ton of VMs so generally I have over 15 different IPs connected to the LAN.
– dnLL
Dec 16 '18 at 16:58
@harrymc I don't "need" dnsmasq per se, just thought it might help improve performances. I'm not dealing with a large number of computers per se but I do have a server with a ton of VMs so generally I have over 15 different IPs connected to the LAN.
– dnLL
Dec 16 '18 at 16:58
I added a paragraph which might help in configuring router name and Windows domain in a way that works.
– harrymc
Dec 19 '18 at 9:43
I added a paragraph which might help in configuring router name and Windows domain in a way that works.
– harrymc
Dec 19 '18 at 9:43
|
show 6 more comments
Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1385021%2flocal-hostname-not-working-without-the-trailing-dot%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
What Windows version are you using?
– Binarus
Dec 23 '18 at 8:38
Tried on 3 different Windows desktops so far, all Windows 10.
– dnLL
Dec 23 '18 at 11:54