How to install local .deb packages with apt-get

130

Is there a way to install packages store on your HD with apt-get, like apt-get install ./package.deb?

If not, how to handle the dependencies in a very very easy way?

edited May 16 '18 at 8:53

Melebius

6231824

asked Oct 7 '10 at 8:02

Louis

1,1642914

add a comment |

130

Is there a way to install packages store on your HD with apt-get, like apt-get install ./package.deb?

If not, how to handle the dependencies in a very very easy way?

edited May 16 '18 at 8:53

Melebius

6231824

asked Oct 7 '10 at 8:02

Louis

1,1642914

add a comment |

130

Is there a way to install packages store on your HD with apt-get, like apt-get install ./package.deb?

If not, how to handle the dependencies in a very very easy way?

edited May 16 '18 at 8:53

Melebius

6231824

asked Oct 7 '10 at 8:02

Louis

1,1642914

Is there a way to install packages store on your HD with apt-get, like apt-get install ./package.deb?

If not, how to handle the dependencies in a very very easy way?

linux debian packages apt aptitude

edited May 16 '18 at 8:53

Melebius

6231824

asked Oct 7 '10 at 8:02

Louis

1,1642914

edited May 16 '18 at 8:53

Melebius

6231824

asked Oct 7 '10 at 8:02

Louis

1,1642914

edited May 16 '18 at 8:53

Melebius

6231824

edited May 16 '18 at 8:53

Melebius

6231824

edited May 16 '18 at 8:53

Melebius

6231824

asked Oct 7 '10 at 8:02

Louis

1,1642914

asked Oct 7 '10 at 8:02

Louis

1,1642914

asked Oct 7 '10 at 8:02

Louis

1,1642914

add a comment |

4 Answers
4

active

oldest

votes

112

usually I do dpkg -i <deb file>, it'll fail saying it needs dependencies. After that when you do an apt-get update it'll say at the end something like "dependencies are ready to install" I think it then advises to use apt-get install -f.

Once that's done, I use dpkg -i again.

Worked fine for me last few years.

edit: looking a bit further, apparently a tool called gdebi can do this as gdebi [deb file].

edited Jul 17 '14 at 1:45

answered Oct 7 '10 at 8:19

Sirex

9,69343252

1

Thanks i did the same by "error" dpkg then apt-get install -f and it worked.
– Louis
Oct 7 '10 at 8:22

2

gdebi is worked for me, and simplest I have seen so far.
– ctrl-alt-delor
Aug 18 '16 at 15:00

add a comment |

Sirex has it more or less correct, but his answer isn't clear. I just solved this, so here's what I did:

sudo dpkg -i /path/to/filename.deb

If this fails with a message about the package depending on something that isn't installed, you can probably fix it if you run

sudo apt-get -f install

This will install the dependencies (assuming they're available in the repos your system knows about) AND the package you were originally requesting to install ('f' is the 'fix' option and 'y' is the 'assume yes to prompts' or 'don't ask me if it's ok, just install it already' option -- very useful for scripted silent installs). On the system I was on, there was no need to run dpkg again (Ubuntu lucid 10.04).

I found it interesting that if you leave off the -f when you run sudo apt-get install, it will list your package as not being configured due to an unresolved dependency as well as helpfully suggesting: Unmet dependencies. Try 'apt-get -f install' with no packages (or specify a solution).

Edit:

If you want install without having to answer 'y' to all of the questions, you can add the y modifier as I originally included: sudo apt-get -fy install. However, a commenter pointed out that apt will sometimes suggest that you uninstall your entire desktop environment. I was doing this work in a VM and didn't have that concern, but this post has been updated to reflect being a bit more careful.

edited Sep 8 '14 at 18:18

answered Jan 16 '13 at 20:21

Akrikos

65155

If I have all the package files already in a directory, is there a way to tell apt that this is a new repository, so i won't have to force it installing anything without dependencies?
– Berry Tsakala
Mar 4 '13 at 13:33

2

I'm sorry, but I don't know. I'd suggest asking that as another top level question.
– Akrikos
Mar 12 '13 at 18:56

Crazy strange that this is required. On raspian, this will require sudo (for both dpkg and apt-get): sudo dpkg -i mypackages.deb, etc.
– Brent Faust
Aug 16 '13 at 0:53

@Rubistro root access it required on all systems. I guess the answers assumed that that commands are executed by root (e.g. from an interactive root shell, or a script which executes as root).
– Amos Shapira
Jan 5 '14 at 19:34

2

For you own good, do not add the -y option. It is quite common for apt to suggest, for example, uninstalling your whole desktop environment if you try this with the wrong package at the wrong time (at least on Debian).
– oseiskar
Sep 5 '14 at 14:39

add a comment |

You can also install .deb file using gdebi.Run the below commands to install gdebi,

sudo apt-get install gdebi-core

Install .deb packages with gdebi,

sudo gdebi /path/to/filename.deb

It also fix dependencies.

answered Jan 7 '14 at 17:58

Avinash Raj

6771714

4

Note that gdebi only takes a single argument and silently drops the rest on the floor. This means if you're installing multiple debs at the same time (perhaps because they depend on each other) you'll need to carefully craft gdebi commands which allow them to install. imo this half defeats the purpose of gdebi, but you may still find it useful for a single file
– Anthony Sottile
Jul 15 '15 at 2:58

@Anthony then find -name *.deb -exec gdebi {} ;
– jjmontes
Jul 25 '15 at 16:40

3

@jjmontes that'll only work if the interdependencies are in alphabetical order which I'd wager is pretty rare
– Anthony Sottile
Jul 26 '15 at 15:34

I followed this freesoftwaremagazine.com/articles/… (bug the local repo had to be at /var/www/html/debs) and synaptic kept trying to download from remote even w/o internet, so gdebi worked great with the local repo! also, the .deb files had to be chmod +r *.deb
– Aquarius Power
Jul 13 '18 at 23:36

add a comment |

Yes, the command you proposed is correct.

sudo apt-get install ./package.deb

will install the package you got from another source than APT and same time use APT capabilities to resolve its dependencies automatically. Unfortunately, this apt-get feature is not documented in the man page.

See https://askubuntu.com/a/769542/250300 for details.

edited Oct 26 '17 at 4:38

answered Aug 26 '17 at 7:13

Melebius

6231824

2

This should have been the accepted answer.
– Peter
May 16 '18 at 6:57

Which version of apt-get added this capability?
– Kurt Fitzner
Dec 24 '18 at 4:28

add a comment |

Your Answer

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "3"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});

}
});

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f196864%2fhow-to-install-local-deb-packages-with-apt-get%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

4 Answers
4

active

oldest

votes

4 Answers
4

active

oldest

votes

112

Once that's done, I use dpkg -i again.

Worked fine for me last few years.

edit: looking a bit further, apparently a tool called gdebi can do this as gdebi [deb file].

edited Jul 17 '14 at 1:45

answered Oct 7 '10 at 8:19

Sirex

9,69343252

1

Thanks i did the same by "error" dpkg then apt-get install -f and it worked.
– Louis
Oct 7 '10 at 8:22

2

gdebi is worked for me, and simplest I have seen so far.
– ctrl-alt-delor
Aug 18 '16 at 15:00

add a comment |

112

Once that's done, I use dpkg -i again.

Worked fine for me last few years.

edit: looking a bit further, apparently a tool called gdebi can do this as gdebi [deb file].

edited Jul 17 '14 at 1:45

answered Oct 7 '10 at 8:19

Sirex

9,69343252

1

Thanks i did the same by "error" dpkg then apt-get install -f and it worked.
– Louis
Oct 7 '10 at 8:22

2

gdebi is worked for me, and simplest I have seen so far.
– ctrl-alt-delor
Aug 18 '16 at 15:00

add a comment |

112

Once that's done, I use dpkg -i again.

Worked fine for me last few years.

edit: looking a bit further, apparently a tool called gdebi can do this as gdebi [deb file].

edited Jul 17 '14 at 1:45

answered Oct 7 '10 at 8:19

Sirex

9,69343252

Once that's done, I use dpkg -i again.

Worked fine for me last few years.

edit: looking a bit further, apparently a tool called gdebi can do this as gdebi [deb file].

edited Jul 17 '14 at 1:45

answered Oct 7 '10 at 8:19

Sirex

9,69343252

edited Jul 17 '14 at 1:45

answered Oct 7 '10 at 8:19

Sirex

9,69343252

answered Oct 7 '10 at 8:19

Sirex

9,69343252

answered Oct 7 '10 at 8:19

Sirex

9,69343252

1

Thanks i did the same by "error" dpkg then apt-get install -f and it worked.
– Louis
Oct 7 '10 at 8:22

2

gdebi is worked for me, and simplest I have seen so far.
– ctrl-alt-delor
Aug 18 '16 at 15:00

add a comment |

1

Thanks i did the same by "error" dpkg then apt-get install -f and it worked.
– Louis
Oct 7 '10 at 8:22

2

gdebi is worked for me, and simplest I have seen so far.
– ctrl-alt-delor
Aug 18 '16 at 15:00

Thanks i did the same by "error" dpkg then apt-get install -f and it worked.
– Louis
Oct 7 '10 at 8:22

gdebi is worked for me, and simplest I have seen so far.
– ctrl-alt-delor
Aug 18 '16 at 15:00

add a comment |

Sirex has it more or less correct, but his answer isn't clear. I just solved this, so here's what I did:

sudo dpkg -i /path/to/filename.deb

If this fails with a message about the package depending on something that isn't installed, you can probably fix it if you run

sudo apt-get -f install

Edit:

edited Sep 8 '14 at 18:18

answered Jan 16 '13 at 20:21

Akrikos

65155

If I have all the package files already in a directory, is there a way to tell apt that this is a new repository, so i won't have to force it installing anything without dependencies?
– Berry Tsakala
Mar 4 '13 at 13:33

2

I'm sorry, but I don't know. I'd suggest asking that as another top level question.
– Akrikos
Mar 12 '13 at 18:56

Crazy strange that this is required. On raspian, this will require sudo (for both dpkg and apt-get): sudo dpkg -i mypackages.deb, etc.
– Brent Faust
Aug 16 '13 at 0:53

@Rubistro root access it required on all systems. I guess the answers assumed that that commands are executed by root (e.g. from an interactive root shell, or a script which executes as root).
– Amos Shapira
Jan 5 '14 at 19:34

2

For you own good, do not add the -y option. It is quite common for apt to suggest, for example, uninstalling your whole desktop environment if you try this with the wrong package at the wrong time (at least on Debian).
– oseiskar
Sep 5 '14 at 14:39

add a comment |

Sirex has it more or less correct, but his answer isn't clear. I just solved this, so here's what I did:

sudo dpkg -i /path/to/filename.deb

If this fails with a message about the package depending on something that isn't installed, you can probably fix it if you run

sudo apt-get -f install

Edit:

edited Sep 8 '14 at 18:18

answered Jan 16 '13 at 20:21

Akrikos

65155

If I have all the package files already in a directory, is there a way to tell apt that this is a new repository, so i won't have to force it installing anything without dependencies?
– Berry Tsakala
Mar 4 '13 at 13:33

2

I'm sorry, but I don't know. I'd suggest asking that as another top level question.
– Akrikos
Mar 12 '13 at 18:56

Crazy strange that this is required. On raspian, this will require sudo (for both dpkg and apt-get): sudo dpkg -i mypackages.deb, etc.
– Brent Faust
Aug 16 '13 at 0:53

@Rubistro root access it required on all systems. I guess the answers assumed that that commands are executed by root (e.g. from an interactive root shell, or a script which executes as root).
– Amos Shapira
Jan 5 '14 at 19:34

2

For you own good, do not add the -y option. It is quite common for apt to suggest, for example, uninstalling your whole desktop environment if you try this with the wrong package at the wrong time (at least on Debian).
– oseiskar
Sep 5 '14 at 14:39

add a comment |

Sirex has it more or less correct, but his answer isn't clear. I just solved this, so here's what I did:

sudo dpkg -i /path/to/filename.deb

If this fails with a message about the package depending on something that isn't installed, you can probably fix it if you run

sudo apt-get -f install

Edit:

edited Sep 8 '14 at 18:18

answered Jan 16 '13 at 20:21

Akrikos

65155

Sirex has it more or less correct, but his answer isn't clear. I just solved this, so here's what I did:

sudo dpkg -i /path/to/filename.deb

If this fails with a message about the package depending on something that isn't installed, you can probably fix it if you run

sudo apt-get -f install

Edit:

edited Sep 8 '14 at 18:18

answered Jan 16 '13 at 20:21

Akrikos

65155

edited Sep 8 '14 at 18:18

answered Jan 16 '13 at 20:21

Akrikos

65155

answered Jan 16 '13 at 20:21

Akrikos

65155

answered Jan 16 '13 at 20:21

Akrikos

65155

If I have all the package files already in a directory, is there a way to tell apt that this is a new repository, so i won't have to force it installing anything without dependencies?
– Berry Tsakala
Mar 4 '13 at 13:33

2

I'm sorry, but I don't know. I'd suggest asking that as another top level question.
– Akrikos
Mar 12 '13 at 18:56

Crazy strange that this is required. On raspian, this will require sudo (for both dpkg and apt-get): sudo dpkg -i mypackages.deb, etc.
– Brent Faust
Aug 16 '13 at 0:53

@Rubistro root access it required on all systems. I guess the answers assumed that that commands are executed by root (e.g. from an interactive root shell, or a script which executes as root).
– Amos Shapira
Jan 5 '14 at 19:34

2

For you own good, do not add the -y option. It is quite common for apt to suggest, for example, uninstalling your whole desktop environment if you try this with the wrong package at the wrong time (at least on Debian).
– oseiskar
Sep 5 '14 at 14:39

add a comment |

If I have all the package files already in a directory, is there a way to tell apt that this is a new repository, so i won't have to force it installing anything without dependencies?
– Berry Tsakala
Mar 4 '13 at 13:33

2

I'm sorry, but I don't know. I'd suggest asking that as another top level question.
– Akrikos
Mar 12 '13 at 18:56

Crazy strange that this is required. On raspian, this will require sudo (for both dpkg and apt-get): sudo dpkg -i mypackages.deb, etc.
– Brent Faust
Aug 16 '13 at 0:53

@Rubistro root access it required on all systems. I guess the answers assumed that that commands are executed by root (e.g. from an interactive root shell, or a script which executes as root).
– Amos Shapira
Jan 5 '14 at 19:34

2

For you own good, do not add the -y option. It is quite common for apt to suggest, for example, uninstalling your whole desktop environment if you try this with the wrong package at the wrong time (at least on Debian).
– oseiskar
Sep 5 '14 at 14:39

If I have all the package files already in a directory, is there a way to tell apt that this is a new repository, so i won't have to force it installing anything without dependencies?
– Berry Tsakala
Mar 4 '13 at 13:33

I'm sorry, but I don't know. I'd suggest asking that as another top level question.
– Akrikos
Mar 12 '13 at 18:56

Crazy strange that this is required. On raspian, this will require sudo (for both dpkg and apt-get): sudo dpkg -i mypackages.deb, etc.
– Brent Faust
Aug 16 '13 at 0:53

@Rubistro root access it required on all systems. I guess the answers assumed that that commands are executed by root (e.g. from an interactive root shell, or a script which executes as root).
– Amos Shapira
Jan 5 '14 at 19:34

For you own good, do not add the -y option. It is quite common for apt to suggest, for example, uninstalling your whole desktop environment if you try this with the wrong package at the wrong time (at least on Debian).
– oseiskar
Sep 5 '14 at 14:39

add a comment |

You can also install .deb file using gdebi.Run the below commands to install gdebi,

sudo apt-get install gdebi-core

Install .deb packages with gdebi,

sudo gdebi /path/to/filename.deb

It also fix dependencies.

answered Jan 7 '14 at 17:58

Avinash Raj

6771714

4

Note that gdebi only takes a single argument and silently drops the rest on the floor. This means if you're installing multiple debs at the same time (perhaps because they depend on each other) you'll need to carefully craft gdebi commands which allow them to install. imo this half defeats the purpose of gdebi, but you may still find it useful for a single file
– Anthony Sottile
Jul 15 '15 at 2:58

@Anthony then find -name *.deb -exec gdebi {} ;
– jjmontes
Jul 25 '15 at 16:40

3

@jjmontes that'll only work if the interdependencies are in alphabetical order which I'd wager is pretty rare
– Anthony Sottile
Jul 26 '15 at 15:34

I followed this freesoftwaremagazine.com/articles/… (bug the local repo had to be at /var/www/html/debs) and synaptic kept trying to download from remote even w/o internet, so gdebi worked great with the local repo! also, the .deb files had to be chmod +r *.deb
– Aquarius Power
Jul 13 '18 at 23:36

add a comment |

You can also install .deb file using gdebi.Run the below commands to install gdebi,

sudo apt-get install gdebi-core

Install .deb packages with gdebi,

sudo gdebi /path/to/filename.deb

It also fix dependencies.

answered Jan 7 '14 at 17:58

Avinash Raj

6771714

4

Note that gdebi only takes a single argument and silently drops the rest on the floor. This means if you're installing multiple debs at the same time (perhaps because they depend on each other) you'll need to carefully craft gdebi commands which allow them to install. imo this half defeats the purpose of gdebi, but you may still find it useful for a single file
– Anthony Sottile
Jul 15 '15 at 2:58

@Anthony then find -name *.deb -exec gdebi {} ;
– jjmontes
Jul 25 '15 at 16:40

3

@jjmontes that'll only work if the interdependencies are in alphabetical order which I'd wager is pretty rare
– Anthony Sottile
Jul 26 '15 at 15:34

I followed this freesoftwaremagazine.com/articles/… (bug the local repo had to be at /var/www/html/debs) and synaptic kept trying to download from remote even w/o internet, so gdebi worked great with the local repo! also, the .deb files had to be chmod +r *.deb
– Aquarius Power
Jul 13 '18 at 23:36

add a comment |

You can also install .deb file using gdebi.Run the below commands to install gdebi,

sudo apt-get install gdebi-core

Install .deb packages with gdebi,

sudo gdebi /path/to/filename.deb

It also fix dependencies.

answered Jan 7 '14 at 17:58

Avinash Raj

6771714

You can also install .deb file using gdebi.Run the below commands to install gdebi,

sudo apt-get install gdebi-core

Install .deb packages with gdebi,

sudo gdebi /path/to/filename.deb

It also fix dependencies.

answered Jan 7 '14 at 17:58

Avinash Raj

6771714

answered Jan 7 '14 at 17:58

Avinash Raj

6771714

answered Jan 7 '14 at 17:58

Avinash Raj

6771714

answered Jan 7 '14 at 17:58

Avinash Raj

6771714

4

Note that gdebi only takes a single argument and silently drops the rest on the floor. This means if you're installing multiple debs at the same time (perhaps because they depend on each other) you'll need to carefully craft gdebi commands which allow them to install. imo this half defeats the purpose of gdebi, but you may still find it useful for a single file
– Anthony Sottile
Jul 15 '15 at 2:58

@Anthony then find -name *.deb -exec gdebi {} ;
– jjmontes
Jul 25 '15 at 16:40

3

@jjmontes that'll only work if the interdependencies are in alphabetical order which I'd wager is pretty rare
– Anthony Sottile
Jul 26 '15 at 15:34

I followed this freesoftwaremagazine.com/articles/… (bug the local repo had to be at /var/www/html/debs) and synaptic kept trying to download from remote even w/o internet, so gdebi worked great with the local repo! also, the .deb files had to be chmod +r *.deb
– Aquarius Power
Jul 13 '18 at 23:36

add a comment |

4

Note that gdebi only takes a single argument and silently drops the rest on the floor. This means if you're installing multiple debs at the same time (perhaps because they depend on each other) you'll need to carefully craft gdebi commands which allow them to install. imo this half defeats the purpose of gdebi, but you may still find it useful for a single file
– Anthony Sottile
Jul 15 '15 at 2:58

@Anthony then find -name *.deb -exec gdebi {} ;
– jjmontes
Jul 25 '15 at 16:40

3

@jjmontes that'll only work if the interdependencies are in alphabetical order which I'd wager is pretty rare
– Anthony Sottile
Jul 26 '15 at 15:34

I followed this freesoftwaremagazine.com/articles/… (bug the local repo had to be at /var/www/html/debs) and synaptic kept trying to download from remote even w/o internet, so gdebi worked great with the local repo! also, the .deb files had to be chmod +r *.deb
– Aquarius Power
Jul 13 '18 at 23:36

Note that gdebi only takes a single argument and silently drops the rest on the floor. This means if you're installing multiple debs at the same time (perhaps because they depend on each other) you'll need to carefully craft gdebi commands which allow them to install. imo this half defeats the purpose of gdebi, but you may still find it useful for a single file
– Anthony Sottile
Jul 15 '15 at 2:58

@Anthony then find -name *.deb -exec gdebi {} ;
– jjmontes
Jul 25 '15 at 16:40

@jjmontes that'll only work if the interdependencies are in alphabetical order which I'd wager is pretty rare
– Anthony Sottile
Jul 26 '15 at 15:34

I followed this freesoftwaremagazine.com/articles/… (bug the local repo had to be at /var/www/html/debs) and synaptic kept trying to download from remote even w/o internet, so gdebi worked great with the local repo! also, the .deb files had to be chmod +r *.deb
– Aquarius Power
Jul 13 '18 at 23:36

add a comment |

Yes, the command you proposed is correct.

sudo apt-get install ./package.deb

See https://askubuntu.com/a/769542/250300 for details.

edited Oct 26 '17 at 4:38

answered Aug 26 '17 at 7:13

Melebius

6231824

2

This should have been the accepted answer.
– Peter
May 16 '18 at 6:57

Which version of apt-get added this capability?
– Kurt Fitzner
Dec 24 '18 at 4:28

add a comment |

Yes, the command you proposed is correct.

sudo apt-get install ./package.deb

See https://askubuntu.com/a/769542/250300 for details.

edited Oct 26 '17 at 4:38

answered Aug 26 '17 at 7:13

Melebius

6231824

2

This should have been the accepted answer.
– Peter
May 16 '18 at 6:57

Which version of apt-get added this capability?
– Kurt Fitzner
Dec 24 '18 at 4:28

add a comment |

Yes, the command you proposed is correct.

sudo apt-get install ./package.deb

See https://askubuntu.com/a/769542/250300 for details.

edited Oct 26 '17 at 4:38

answered Aug 26 '17 at 7:13

Melebius

6231824

Yes, the command you proposed is correct.

sudo apt-get install ./package.deb

See https://askubuntu.com/a/769542/250300 for details.

edited Oct 26 '17 at 4:38

answered Aug 26 '17 at 7:13

Melebius

6231824

edited Oct 26 '17 at 4:38

answered Aug 26 '17 at 7:13

Melebius

6231824

answered Aug 26 '17 at 7:13

Melebius

6231824

answered Aug 26 '17 at 7:13

Melebius

6231824

2

This should have been the accepted answer.
– Peter
May 16 '18 at 6:57

Which version of apt-get added this capability?
– Kurt Fitzner
Dec 24 '18 at 4:28

add a comment |

2

This should have been the accepted answer.
– Peter
May 16 '18 at 6:57

Which version of apt-get added this capability?
– Kurt Fitzner
Dec 24 '18 at 4:28

This should have been the accepted answer.
– Peter
May 16 '18 at 6:57

Which version of apt-get added this capability?
– Kurt Fitzner
Dec 24 '18 at 4:28

add a comment |

draft saved

draft discarded

Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!

Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …

Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.

Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.

Please pay close attention to the following guidance:

Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …

Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

Name

Required, but never shown

Name

Required, but never shown

This page is only for reference, If you need detailed information, please check here

搜尋此網誌

Gfrktyl