What is the Unit Digit of the Sum?
I am thinking of 2 integers $x$ and $y$ which follow the following;
$$2≤x≤y$$
$$x+y≤47$$
I then write the sum $S = x+y$ and the product $P=xy$ on two separate cards.
I pass the sum card to player A and the product card to player B. Neither player knows what is on the other person's card or what the numbers $x, y$ are.
Player A then says "I know that you cannot work out $S$".
Player B then says "I have learnt something but still don't know $x$ and $y$".
Player A then says "I have learnt something and I do know $x$ and $y$".
Player B then says "Finally I know $x$ and $y$ as well".
What must the unit digit of $S$ be?
mathematics logical-deduction meta-knowledge
add a comment |
I am thinking of 2 integers $x$ and $y$ which follow the following;
$$2≤x≤y$$
$$x+y≤47$$
I then write the sum $S = x+y$ and the product $P=xy$ on two separate cards.
I pass the sum card to player A and the product card to player B. Neither player knows what is on the other person's card or what the numbers $x, y$ are.
Player A then says "I know that you cannot work out $S$".
Player B then says "I have learnt something but still don't know $x$ and $y$".
Player A then says "I have learnt something and I do know $x$ and $y$".
Player B then says "Finally I know $x$ and $y$ as well".
What must the unit digit of $S$ be?
mathematics logical-deduction meta-knowledge
add a comment |
I am thinking of 2 integers $x$ and $y$ which follow the following;
$$2≤x≤y$$
$$x+y≤47$$
I then write the sum $S = x+y$ and the product $P=xy$ on two separate cards.
I pass the sum card to player A and the product card to player B. Neither player knows what is on the other person's card or what the numbers $x, y$ are.
Player A then says "I know that you cannot work out $S$".
Player B then says "I have learnt something but still don't know $x$ and $y$".
Player A then says "I have learnt something and I do know $x$ and $y$".
Player B then says "Finally I know $x$ and $y$ as well".
What must the unit digit of $S$ be?
mathematics logical-deduction meta-knowledge
I am thinking of 2 integers $x$ and $y$ which follow the following;
$$2≤x≤y$$
$$x+y≤47$$
I then write the sum $S = x+y$ and the product $P=xy$ on two separate cards.
I pass the sum card to player A and the product card to player B. Neither player knows what is on the other person's card or what the numbers $x, y$ are.
Player A then says "I know that you cannot work out $S$".
Player B then says "I have learnt something but still don't know $x$ and $y$".
Player A then says "I have learnt something and I do know $x$ and $y$".
Player B then says "Finally I know $x$ and $y$ as well".
What must the unit digit of $S$ be?
mathematics logical-deduction meta-knowledge
mathematics logical-deduction meta-knowledge
edited Dec 17 at 12:49
Rand al'Thor
68.9k14228461
68.9k14228461
asked Dec 17 at 12:45
Ben Franks
50214
50214
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
From Player A's first statement, we know that
S must be odd.
If S were even, then there's always the possibility that x and y could both be prime. In that case, P would a product of two primes, which would give away x and y for B, contradicting A's first statement that such a thing must be impossible.
By the exact same token,
Any odd S which is two larger than a prime is impossible.
In addition to that,
There are some number pairs (like x=10, y=25), where you have composite numbers on one or both sides, but given the restriction that x+y < 47, the factorisation of the product is unique.
These are the sums that I found that weren't excluded by the previous two steps. Each is listed with one possible pair of x and y for which the product would give away the factors: 27 (4, 23), 29 (6, 23), 35 (4, 31), 37 (6, 31), 41 (4, 37), 47 (4, 43).
Here are the disqualifying reasons for all the possible sums S, given as the number of the spoiler block that disqualifies them:
Ones:| 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
--------+-----------------------
Tens: 0 | - - - - 1 2 1 2 1 2
1 | 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 2
2 | 1 2 1 1 2 1 3 1 3
3 | 1 2 1 2 1 3 1 3 1 2
4 | 1 3 1 2 1 2 1 3 - -
So B knows that A's sum must be one of the remaining numbers:
11, 17, or 23.
From B's first statement, we know that
B's product must be expressible as a product of two numbers in (at least) two different ways, so that one way corresponds to one possible sum, and the other corresponds to another. If that weren't the case, then B would know x and y at this point already.
By listing all the possible number pairs (of which there are 21 at this point), and cross-referencing the products against the sums, we find that B's product must be one of the following:
30: (5,6, sum 11) or (2,15, sum 17)
42: (3,14, sum 17) or (2,21, sum 23)
60: (5,12, sum 17) or (3,20, sum 23)
Out of these possibilities, the only product, where knowing the sum would help A know x and y is
the first one, particularly the one with x=5, y=6, because if the sum were either 17 or 23, there would still be several choices, and A's second statement would be false.
Therefore, even before B's final statement (which naturally does fit, since even we now know the numbers), we have deduced that
x=5, y=6, S=11, P=30
Beat me to it. Way to go.
– Dylan
Dec 17 at 14:56
I'm not sure I follow your first assumption. ROT13: Ubj qbrf gur snpg gung F vf rira tvir njnl k naq l? Vs F jrer 14, sbe rknzcyr, k naq l jbhyqa'g unir gb or 7 naq 7 (gjb cevzrf); gurl pbhyq or 2 naq 12, 4 naq 10, rgp. Yrg nybar gung 14 pna or gur cebqhpg bs qvssrerag cnvef bs cevzrf (r.t., 3+11).
– Ahmed Abdelhameed
Dec 17 at 15:10
1
@AhmedAbdelhameed ROT13: Cynlre N xabjf O pnaabg xabj gur fhz. Urapr zhfg or bqq. Vs fhz jnf rira naq O unq n cebqhpg bs 2 cevzrf ur jbhyq npghnyyl xabj gur fhz jvgubhg N fnlvat nalguvat. Fb sbe svefg fgngrzrag gb or gehr gura fhz vf bqq.
– Ben Franks
Dec 17 at 15:20
@BenFranks Got it, thanks!
– Ahmed Abdelhameed
Dec 17 at 15:22
Just in case anyone wonders how to make sense of the requirement to only answer with the final digit, assuming that A and B don't know of the <47 limitation doesn't change the answer, it only creates an order of magnitude more cases to check. (Source: just spent more than an hour figuring that out.)
– Bass
Dec 17 at 22:43
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "559"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f77549%2fwhat-is-the-unit-digit-of-the-sum%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
From Player A's first statement, we know that
S must be odd.
If S were even, then there's always the possibility that x and y could both be prime. In that case, P would a product of two primes, which would give away x and y for B, contradicting A's first statement that such a thing must be impossible.
By the exact same token,
Any odd S which is two larger than a prime is impossible.
In addition to that,
There are some number pairs (like x=10, y=25), where you have composite numbers on one or both sides, but given the restriction that x+y < 47, the factorisation of the product is unique.
These are the sums that I found that weren't excluded by the previous two steps. Each is listed with one possible pair of x and y for which the product would give away the factors: 27 (4, 23), 29 (6, 23), 35 (4, 31), 37 (6, 31), 41 (4, 37), 47 (4, 43).
Here are the disqualifying reasons for all the possible sums S, given as the number of the spoiler block that disqualifies them:
Ones:| 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
--------+-----------------------
Tens: 0 | - - - - 1 2 1 2 1 2
1 | 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 2
2 | 1 2 1 1 2 1 3 1 3
3 | 1 2 1 2 1 3 1 3 1 2
4 | 1 3 1 2 1 2 1 3 - -
So B knows that A's sum must be one of the remaining numbers:
11, 17, or 23.
From B's first statement, we know that
B's product must be expressible as a product of two numbers in (at least) two different ways, so that one way corresponds to one possible sum, and the other corresponds to another. If that weren't the case, then B would know x and y at this point already.
By listing all the possible number pairs (of which there are 21 at this point), and cross-referencing the products against the sums, we find that B's product must be one of the following:
30: (5,6, sum 11) or (2,15, sum 17)
42: (3,14, sum 17) or (2,21, sum 23)
60: (5,12, sum 17) or (3,20, sum 23)
Out of these possibilities, the only product, where knowing the sum would help A know x and y is
the first one, particularly the one with x=5, y=6, because if the sum were either 17 or 23, there would still be several choices, and A's second statement would be false.
Therefore, even before B's final statement (which naturally does fit, since even we now know the numbers), we have deduced that
x=5, y=6, S=11, P=30
Beat me to it. Way to go.
– Dylan
Dec 17 at 14:56
I'm not sure I follow your first assumption. ROT13: Ubj qbrf gur snpg gung F vf rira tvir njnl k naq l? Vs F jrer 14, sbe rknzcyr, k naq l jbhyqa'g unir gb or 7 naq 7 (gjb cevzrf); gurl pbhyq or 2 naq 12, 4 naq 10, rgp. Yrg nybar gung 14 pna or gur cebqhpg bs qvssrerag cnvef bs cevzrf (r.t., 3+11).
– Ahmed Abdelhameed
Dec 17 at 15:10
1
@AhmedAbdelhameed ROT13: Cynlre N xabjf O pnaabg xabj gur fhz. Urapr zhfg or bqq. Vs fhz jnf rira naq O unq n cebqhpg bs 2 cevzrf ur jbhyq npghnyyl xabj gur fhz jvgubhg N fnlvat nalguvat. Fb sbe svefg fgngrzrag gb or gehr gura fhz vf bqq.
– Ben Franks
Dec 17 at 15:20
@BenFranks Got it, thanks!
– Ahmed Abdelhameed
Dec 17 at 15:22
Just in case anyone wonders how to make sense of the requirement to only answer with the final digit, assuming that A and B don't know of the <47 limitation doesn't change the answer, it only creates an order of magnitude more cases to check. (Source: just spent more than an hour figuring that out.)
– Bass
Dec 17 at 22:43
add a comment |
From Player A's first statement, we know that
S must be odd.
If S were even, then there's always the possibility that x and y could both be prime. In that case, P would a product of two primes, which would give away x and y for B, contradicting A's first statement that such a thing must be impossible.
By the exact same token,
Any odd S which is two larger than a prime is impossible.
In addition to that,
There are some number pairs (like x=10, y=25), where you have composite numbers on one or both sides, but given the restriction that x+y < 47, the factorisation of the product is unique.
These are the sums that I found that weren't excluded by the previous two steps. Each is listed with one possible pair of x and y for which the product would give away the factors: 27 (4, 23), 29 (6, 23), 35 (4, 31), 37 (6, 31), 41 (4, 37), 47 (4, 43).
Here are the disqualifying reasons for all the possible sums S, given as the number of the spoiler block that disqualifies them:
Ones:| 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
--------+-----------------------
Tens: 0 | - - - - 1 2 1 2 1 2
1 | 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 2
2 | 1 2 1 1 2 1 3 1 3
3 | 1 2 1 2 1 3 1 3 1 2
4 | 1 3 1 2 1 2 1 3 - -
So B knows that A's sum must be one of the remaining numbers:
11, 17, or 23.
From B's first statement, we know that
B's product must be expressible as a product of two numbers in (at least) two different ways, so that one way corresponds to one possible sum, and the other corresponds to another. If that weren't the case, then B would know x and y at this point already.
By listing all the possible number pairs (of which there are 21 at this point), and cross-referencing the products against the sums, we find that B's product must be one of the following:
30: (5,6, sum 11) or (2,15, sum 17)
42: (3,14, sum 17) or (2,21, sum 23)
60: (5,12, sum 17) or (3,20, sum 23)
Out of these possibilities, the only product, where knowing the sum would help A know x and y is
the first one, particularly the one with x=5, y=6, because if the sum were either 17 or 23, there would still be several choices, and A's second statement would be false.
Therefore, even before B's final statement (which naturally does fit, since even we now know the numbers), we have deduced that
x=5, y=6, S=11, P=30
Beat me to it. Way to go.
– Dylan
Dec 17 at 14:56
I'm not sure I follow your first assumption. ROT13: Ubj qbrf gur snpg gung F vf rira tvir njnl k naq l? Vs F jrer 14, sbe rknzcyr, k naq l jbhyqa'g unir gb or 7 naq 7 (gjb cevzrf); gurl pbhyq or 2 naq 12, 4 naq 10, rgp. Yrg nybar gung 14 pna or gur cebqhpg bs qvssrerag cnvef bs cevzrf (r.t., 3+11).
– Ahmed Abdelhameed
Dec 17 at 15:10
1
@AhmedAbdelhameed ROT13: Cynlre N xabjf O pnaabg xabj gur fhz. Urapr zhfg or bqq. Vs fhz jnf rira naq O unq n cebqhpg bs 2 cevzrf ur jbhyq npghnyyl xabj gur fhz jvgubhg N fnlvat nalguvat. Fb sbe svefg fgngrzrag gb or gehr gura fhz vf bqq.
– Ben Franks
Dec 17 at 15:20
@BenFranks Got it, thanks!
– Ahmed Abdelhameed
Dec 17 at 15:22
Just in case anyone wonders how to make sense of the requirement to only answer with the final digit, assuming that A and B don't know of the <47 limitation doesn't change the answer, it only creates an order of magnitude more cases to check. (Source: just spent more than an hour figuring that out.)
– Bass
Dec 17 at 22:43
add a comment |
From Player A's first statement, we know that
S must be odd.
If S were even, then there's always the possibility that x and y could both be prime. In that case, P would a product of two primes, which would give away x and y for B, contradicting A's first statement that such a thing must be impossible.
By the exact same token,
Any odd S which is two larger than a prime is impossible.
In addition to that,
There are some number pairs (like x=10, y=25), where you have composite numbers on one or both sides, but given the restriction that x+y < 47, the factorisation of the product is unique.
These are the sums that I found that weren't excluded by the previous two steps. Each is listed with one possible pair of x and y for which the product would give away the factors: 27 (4, 23), 29 (6, 23), 35 (4, 31), 37 (6, 31), 41 (4, 37), 47 (4, 43).
Here are the disqualifying reasons for all the possible sums S, given as the number of the spoiler block that disqualifies them:
Ones:| 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
--------+-----------------------
Tens: 0 | - - - - 1 2 1 2 1 2
1 | 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 2
2 | 1 2 1 1 2 1 3 1 3
3 | 1 2 1 2 1 3 1 3 1 2
4 | 1 3 1 2 1 2 1 3 - -
So B knows that A's sum must be one of the remaining numbers:
11, 17, or 23.
From B's first statement, we know that
B's product must be expressible as a product of two numbers in (at least) two different ways, so that one way corresponds to one possible sum, and the other corresponds to another. If that weren't the case, then B would know x and y at this point already.
By listing all the possible number pairs (of which there are 21 at this point), and cross-referencing the products against the sums, we find that B's product must be one of the following:
30: (5,6, sum 11) or (2,15, sum 17)
42: (3,14, sum 17) or (2,21, sum 23)
60: (5,12, sum 17) or (3,20, sum 23)
Out of these possibilities, the only product, where knowing the sum would help A know x and y is
the first one, particularly the one with x=5, y=6, because if the sum were either 17 or 23, there would still be several choices, and A's second statement would be false.
Therefore, even before B's final statement (which naturally does fit, since even we now know the numbers), we have deduced that
x=5, y=6, S=11, P=30
From Player A's first statement, we know that
S must be odd.
If S were even, then there's always the possibility that x and y could both be prime. In that case, P would a product of two primes, which would give away x and y for B, contradicting A's first statement that such a thing must be impossible.
By the exact same token,
Any odd S which is two larger than a prime is impossible.
In addition to that,
There are some number pairs (like x=10, y=25), where you have composite numbers on one or both sides, but given the restriction that x+y < 47, the factorisation of the product is unique.
These are the sums that I found that weren't excluded by the previous two steps. Each is listed with one possible pair of x and y for which the product would give away the factors: 27 (4, 23), 29 (6, 23), 35 (4, 31), 37 (6, 31), 41 (4, 37), 47 (4, 43).
Here are the disqualifying reasons for all the possible sums S, given as the number of the spoiler block that disqualifies them:
Ones:| 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
--------+-----------------------
Tens: 0 | - - - - 1 2 1 2 1 2
1 | 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 2
2 | 1 2 1 1 2 1 3 1 3
3 | 1 2 1 2 1 3 1 3 1 2
4 | 1 3 1 2 1 2 1 3 - -
So B knows that A's sum must be one of the remaining numbers:
11, 17, or 23.
From B's first statement, we know that
B's product must be expressible as a product of two numbers in (at least) two different ways, so that one way corresponds to one possible sum, and the other corresponds to another. If that weren't the case, then B would know x and y at this point already.
By listing all the possible number pairs (of which there are 21 at this point), and cross-referencing the products against the sums, we find that B's product must be one of the following:
30: (5,6, sum 11) or (2,15, sum 17)
42: (3,14, sum 17) or (2,21, sum 23)
60: (5,12, sum 17) or (3,20, sum 23)
Out of these possibilities, the only product, where knowing the sum would help A know x and y is
the first one, particularly the one with x=5, y=6, because if the sum were either 17 or 23, there would still be several choices, and A's second statement would be false.
Therefore, even before B's final statement (which naturally does fit, since even we now know the numbers), we have deduced that
x=5, y=6, S=11, P=30
edited Dec 17 at 21:15
answered Dec 17 at 14:56
Bass
27.1k465168
27.1k465168
Beat me to it. Way to go.
– Dylan
Dec 17 at 14:56
I'm not sure I follow your first assumption. ROT13: Ubj qbrf gur snpg gung F vf rira tvir njnl k naq l? Vs F jrer 14, sbe rknzcyr, k naq l jbhyqa'g unir gb or 7 naq 7 (gjb cevzrf); gurl pbhyq or 2 naq 12, 4 naq 10, rgp. Yrg nybar gung 14 pna or gur cebqhpg bs qvssrerag cnvef bs cevzrf (r.t., 3+11).
– Ahmed Abdelhameed
Dec 17 at 15:10
1
@AhmedAbdelhameed ROT13: Cynlre N xabjf O pnaabg xabj gur fhz. Urapr zhfg or bqq. Vs fhz jnf rira naq O unq n cebqhpg bs 2 cevzrf ur jbhyq npghnyyl xabj gur fhz jvgubhg N fnlvat nalguvat. Fb sbe svefg fgngrzrag gb or gehr gura fhz vf bqq.
– Ben Franks
Dec 17 at 15:20
@BenFranks Got it, thanks!
– Ahmed Abdelhameed
Dec 17 at 15:22
Just in case anyone wonders how to make sense of the requirement to only answer with the final digit, assuming that A and B don't know of the <47 limitation doesn't change the answer, it only creates an order of magnitude more cases to check. (Source: just spent more than an hour figuring that out.)
– Bass
Dec 17 at 22:43
add a comment |
Beat me to it. Way to go.
– Dylan
Dec 17 at 14:56
I'm not sure I follow your first assumption. ROT13: Ubj qbrf gur snpg gung F vf rira tvir njnl k naq l? Vs F jrer 14, sbe rknzcyr, k naq l jbhyqa'g unir gb or 7 naq 7 (gjb cevzrf); gurl pbhyq or 2 naq 12, 4 naq 10, rgp. Yrg nybar gung 14 pna or gur cebqhpg bs qvssrerag cnvef bs cevzrf (r.t., 3+11).
– Ahmed Abdelhameed
Dec 17 at 15:10
1
@AhmedAbdelhameed ROT13: Cynlre N xabjf O pnaabg xabj gur fhz. Urapr zhfg or bqq. Vs fhz jnf rira naq O unq n cebqhpg bs 2 cevzrf ur jbhyq npghnyyl xabj gur fhz jvgubhg N fnlvat nalguvat. Fb sbe svefg fgngrzrag gb or gehr gura fhz vf bqq.
– Ben Franks
Dec 17 at 15:20
@BenFranks Got it, thanks!
– Ahmed Abdelhameed
Dec 17 at 15:22
Just in case anyone wonders how to make sense of the requirement to only answer with the final digit, assuming that A and B don't know of the <47 limitation doesn't change the answer, it only creates an order of magnitude more cases to check. (Source: just spent more than an hour figuring that out.)
– Bass
Dec 17 at 22:43
Beat me to it. Way to go.
– Dylan
Dec 17 at 14:56
Beat me to it. Way to go.
– Dylan
Dec 17 at 14:56
I'm not sure I follow your first assumption. ROT13: Ubj qbrf gur snpg gung F vf rira tvir njnl k naq l? Vs F jrer 14, sbe rknzcyr, k naq l jbhyqa'g unir gb or 7 naq 7 (gjb cevzrf); gurl pbhyq or 2 naq 12, 4 naq 10, rgp. Yrg nybar gung 14 pna or gur cebqhpg bs qvssrerag cnvef bs cevzrf (r.t., 3+11).
– Ahmed Abdelhameed
Dec 17 at 15:10
I'm not sure I follow your first assumption. ROT13: Ubj qbrf gur snpg gung F vf rira tvir njnl k naq l? Vs F jrer 14, sbe rknzcyr, k naq l jbhyqa'g unir gb or 7 naq 7 (gjb cevzrf); gurl pbhyq or 2 naq 12, 4 naq 10, rgp. Yrg nybar gung 14 pna or gur cebqhpg bs qvssrerag cnvef bs cevzrf (r.t., 3+11).
– Ahmed Abdelhameed
Dec 17 at 15:10
1
1
@AhmedAbdelhameed ROT13: Cynlre N xabjf O pnaabg xabj gur fhz. Urapr zhfg or bqq. Vs fhz jnf rira naq O unq n cebqhpg bs 2 cevzrf ur jbhyq npghnyyl xabj gur fhz jvgubhg N fnlvat nalguvat. Fb sbe svefg fgngrzrag gb or gehr gura fhz vf bqq.
– Ben Franks
Dec 17 at 15:20
@AhmedAbdelhameed ROT13: Cynlre N xabjf O pnaabg xabj gur fhz. Urapr zhfg or bqq. Vs fhz jnf rira naq O unq n cebqhpg bs 2 cevzrf ur jbhyq npghnyyl xabj gur fhz jvgubhg N fnlvat nalguvat. Fb sbe svefg fgngrzrag gb or gehr gura fhz vf bqq.
– Ben Franks
Dec 17 at 15:20
@BenFranks Got it, thanks!
– Ahmed Abdelhameed
Dec 17 at 15:22
@BenFranks Got it, thanks!
– Ahmed Abdelhameed
Dec 17 at 15:22
Just in case anyone wonders how to make sense of the requirement to only answer with the final digit, assuming that A and B don't know of the <47 limitation doesn't change the answer, it only creates an order of magnitude more cases to check. (Source: just spent more than an hour figuring that out.)
– Bass
Dec 17 at 22:43
Just in case anyone wonders how to make sense of the requirement to only answer with the final digit, assuming that A and B don't know of the <47 limitation doesn't change the answer, it only creates an order of magnitude more cases to check. (Source: just spent more than an hour figuring that out.)
– Bass
Dec 17 at 22:43
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f77549%2fwhat-is-the-unit-digit-of-the-sum%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown