Proper tense in “I've tested the program with this input data and it works”
Let's consider the conversation:
- This program doesn't work with this input data.
- I've tested the program with this input data and it does work.
Is it right to use the present perfect here? Or does the simple past sound more natural?
- I tested the program with this input data and it does work.
I suppose both variants are correct, right? But which one is more natural?
present-perfect present-simple
edited Dec 24 at 13:16
Laurel
4,82811127
asked Dec 24 at 13:08
Alexey
304
New contributor
Alexey is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
Let's consider the conversation:
- This program doesn't work with this input data.
- I've tested the program with this input data and it does work.
Is it right to use the present perfect here? Or does the simple past sound more natural?
- I tested the program with this input data and it does work.
I suppose both variants are correct, right? But which one is more natural?
present-perfect present-simple
edited Dec 24 at 13:16
Laurel
4,82811127
asked Dec 24 at 13:08
Alexey
304
New contributor
Alexey is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Since nobody has mentioned it yet, you can shorten "and it does work" to "and it works". A speaker won't usually need to add the word does unless it's contrary to the context, like if your sentence came right after somebody said "it doesn't work, right?"
– person27
Dec 25 at 6:51
@person27 - We could also say, “I tested the program with this input data and it worked."
– J.R.♦
Dec 25 at 12:46
add a comment |
Let's consider the conversation:
- This program doesn't work with this input data.
- I've tested the program with this input data and it does work.
Is it right to use the present perfect here? Or does the simple past sound more natural?
- I tested the program with this input data and it does work.
I suppose both variants are correct, right? But which one is more natural?
present-perfect present-simple
edited Dec 24 at 13:16
Laurel
4,82811127
asked Dec 24 at 13:08
Alexey
304
New contributor
Alexey is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Let's consider the conversation:
- This program doesn't work with this input data.
- I've tested the program with this input data and it does work.
Is it right to use the present perfect here? Or does the simple past sound more natural?
- I tested the program with this input data and it does work.
I suppose both variants are correct, right? But which one is more natural?
present-perfect present-simple
present-perfect present-simple
edited Dec 24 at 13:16
Laurel
4,82811127
asked Dec 24 at 13:08
Alexey
304
New contributor
Alexey is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited Dec 24 at 13:16
Laurel
4,82811127
asked Dec 24 at 13:08
Alexey
304
New contributor
Alexey is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited Dec 24 at 13:16
Laurel
4,82811127
edited Dec 24 at 13:16
Laurel
4,82811127
edited Dec 24 at 13:16
Laurel
4,82811127
4,82811127
asked Dec 24 at 13:08
Alexey
304
New contributor
Alexey is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked Dec 24 at 13:08
Alexey
304
asked Dec 24 at 13:08
Alexey
304
304
New contributor
Alexey is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Alexey is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Alexey is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Since nobody has mentioned it yet, you can shorten "and it does work" to "and it works". A speaker won't usually need to add the word does unless it's contrary to the context, like if your sentence came right after somebody said "it doesn't work, right?"
– person27
Dec 25 at 6:51
@person27 - We could also say, “I tested the program with this input data and it worked."
– J.R.♦
Dec 25 at 12:46
add a comment |
Since nobody has mentioned it yet, you can shorten "and it does work" to "and it works". A speaker won't usually need to add the word does unless it's contrary to the context, like if your sentence came right after somebody said "it doesn't work, right?"
– person27
Dec 25 at 6:51
@person27 - We could also say, “I tested the program with this input data and it worked."
– J.R.♦
Dec 25 at 12:46
Since nobody has mentioned it yet, you can shorten "and it does work" to "and it works". A speaker won't usually need to add the word does unless it's contrary to the context, like if your sentence came right after somebody said "it doesn't work, right?"
– person27
Dec 25 at 6:51
Since nobody has mentioned it yet, you can shorten "and it does work" to "and it works". A speaker won't usually need to add the word does unless it's contrary to the context, like if your sentence came right after somebody said "it doesn't work, right?"
– person27
Dec 25 at 6:51
@person27 - We could also say, “I tested the program with this input data and it worked."
– J.R.♦
Dec 25 at 12:46
@person27 - We could also say, “I tested the program with this input data and it worked."
– J.R.♦
Dec 25 at 12:46
add a comment |
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
While both tenses are idiomatic and correct, the choice between present perfect and past generally depends on the context.
If you had recently tested the program, you would be more likely to say I have tested....
If your statement related back to a test that you had carried out in the past (whether last month, last year or whatever) you are more likely to say I tested.... With the use of the past tense, one frequently gives the approximate date.
I tested the programme last week/month/year and it does work.
answered Dec 24 at 14:31
Ronald Sole
9,36211019
I've upvoted your answer because it's somewhat accurate, and even though recency is a factor – and I'd definitely say I tested would be used when that's not the case, and that perhaps you're not confident in the results anymore – it's not a decisive one. I've tested them can be said about something you did 2 years ago, but because there've been no changes to what you tested, you're confident that you still "have" that thing tested. That, I think, is what matters in this case.
– userr2684291
Dec 24 at 15:21
add a comment |
I wouldn't find either statement obviously wrong, or expect a native speaker not to say one of them, but they seem subtly different.
To me, saying:
I've tested the program with this input data and it does work.
emphasises that the program is, right now, in a tested state. Whereas:
I tested the program with this input data and it does work.
emphasizes a past event - you testing it. For that reason I'd prefer the first if you wanted to keep the 'and it does work', and simply 'I tested the program with this input data' (or 'I tested the program with this input data and it worked', or 'I tested the program with this input data this morning and it worked') if you were not sure that it still worked now.
I speak British English - US English seems to use the present perfect tense less often, so you may get different judgements from Americans.
answered Dec 24 at 17:12
Alex Hayward
611
New contributor
Alex Hayward is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
This is perhaps the best answer. The only difference is the simple past is a done deal and the present perfect is past but when is irrelevant. If you want to say when it was tested, you have to use the simple past. (By the way, this BrE versus AmE thing is simply not true, except for unschooled speakers).Somehow this myth has continued to spread around here like wildfire and it simply is not true.
– Lambie
Dec 24 at 18:26
1
@Lambie Regarding this "myth", The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language by Huddleston, Pullum, et al. says the following: "There are some relatively small-scale differences between AmE and BrE with respect to the choice between the present perfect and the simple preterite – cases where AmE may prefer a simple preterite where BrE requires a present perfect. One case concerns situations in the recent past, where I just saw them, for example, might be preferred in AmE, I've just seen them in BrE. Another case concerns the aspectual adjuncts already and yet."
– userr2684291
Dec 24 at 19:56
1
Of course, it is these small-scale differences that're pronounced due to the fact the described situations arise often (in speech in particular). So yes, I'd say AmE definitely uses the present perfect less frequently (in absolute numbers), but not across the board as far as the number of distinct uses of the present perfect goes. What I've quoted obviously doesn't apply here, so I'd say the caveat in the answer is a distraction.
– userr2684291
Dec 24 at 20:03
@userr2684291Yes, they can say what they like. I disagree with them. There are tons more people in North America than Britain, therefore, things tend to stand out. For me, all other things being equal (education, mostly), there is no difference there. I am American and hear the PP all the time. The idea it is "less used" is laughable. The more educated, the more proper use of PP you get. The less formally educated,the less standard use you get on both sides of the Atlantic.
– Lambie
Dec 24 at 21:10
@Lambie What do you mean by the more educated, the more PP? Native speakers usually don't need any education to use their language correctly.
– Alexey
Dec 26 at 11:12
|
show 1 more comment
Both are right but to me, this is more natural:
I have tested the program with this input data and it works.
answered Dec 24 at 13:14
Daniil Manokhin
1,26117
1
It is not true that one is more natural than the other.
– Lambie
Dec 24 at 19:42
If I say I tested the program and it does work, then there was some expectation that it wouldn’t. Saying I tested it and it works doesn’t carry that expectation.
– James
Dec 25 at 17:25
add a comment |
The perfect aspect is used to indicate the state relative to some other time; in the case of present perfect, that time is now. So "I have tested" implies that while the testing was done in the past, it remains relevant, allowing one to follow with "it works" in the present tense: the act of testing was completed, and remains completed. Using the simple past put the action purely in the past, and doesn't imply anything about the current state; the simple past doesn't have the same connotation of it being completed as the present perfect does. So following it with the present tense is off; it should be "I tested it and it worked".
answered Dec 24 at 18:47
Acccumulation
1,06616
1
What about "Pat baked some cookies and they are delicious."?
– Scott
Dec 24 at 20:21
add a comment |
This is a computer-programmer's opinion, rather than a linguists answer, but I would only ever use
I tested the program with this input data and it worked.
(Emphasis added for clarity.)
answered Dec 24 at 19:12
ShapeOfMatter
112
New contributor
ShapeOfMatter is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
I have some sympathy for this point of view. But it raises the question: What's the purpose of testing if all it proves is that the product worked when you tested it? Testing is meant to ensure that the thing works now, and will continue to work. (Of course all bets are off if the program was modified after you tested it.)
– Scott
Dec 24 at 20:27
@Scott what you say is always true. Testing the program only means that it worked for the person who did the test, at that time. If there is a bug that causes random behaviour, it may work some times but not others, or it may only fail if you do a particular sequence of operations before the test. Personally, if I was talking to a user, I would probably say "...and it worked for me" to make it clear I wasn't challenging the fact that it didn't work for someone else, but implying that for some reason we must have done different things.
– alephzero
Dec 25 at 10:35
add a comment |
To answer your question simply, only the first variant of that sentence is correct. That being said, very many people will use the second, and since English is an ever-changing language there will probably come a point in the future, possibly a very close one where it will be considered correct. The reason only the first is correct is verb tense consistency. In other words, if a sentence starts in past simple, it stays in past simple; if it starts in present perfect, it stays in present perfect.
If you say, "I tested the program with this input data..." then your sentence is in past simple, and so the rest of the sentence should be as well. Therefore, "... and it does work." is the wrong tense. The correct ending to the sentence as started above would be, "... and it worked." The entire sentence is therefore in past simple.
Having said that, It's worth reiterating that it probably will be used like this about as much as it isn't. Naturalness does tend to win out over correctness, and then becomes correctness for as long as it takes for something else to feel natural.
answered Dec 24 at 17:49
Be Cn
71
New contributor
Be Cn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
@Lambie In your second sentence have read isn't a simple past tense.
– userr2684291
Dec 24 at 19:49
1
Either one is fine: I have read it and it is true. I read it and it is true. Different nuances, both grammatical.
– Lambie
Dec 24 at 21:12
Lambie was perfectly constructive and polite .. and correct. Your assertions in the answer are unfounded. There is nothing inherently wrong with using two tenses in a sentence when you're talking about two things. "I went to the doctor for a check-up, and I'm fine". There is an implied assumption that if you were fine when you went to the doctor then you're probably still fine now -- and we conventionally accept this as given. The same applies for the OP's phrase.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
Dec 25 at 0:33
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "481"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Alexey is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f190621%2fproper-tense-in-ive-tested-the-program-with-this-input-data-and-it-works%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
While both tenses are idiomatic and correct, the choice between present perfect and past generally depends on the context.
If you had recently tested the program, you would be more likely to say I have tested....
If your statement related back to a test that you had carried out in the past (whether last month, last year or whatever) you are more likely to say I tested.... With the use of the past tense, one frequently gives the approximate date.
I tested the programme last week/month/year and it does work.
answered Dec 24 at 14:31
Ronald Sole
9,36211019
I've upvoted your answer because it's somewhat accurate, and even though recency is a factor – and I'd definitely say I tested would be used when that's not the case, and that perhaps you're not confident in the results anymore – it's not a decisive one. I've tested them can be said about something you did 2 years ago, but because there've been no changes to what you tested, you're confident that you still "have" that thing tested. That, I think, is what matters in this case.
– userr2684291
Dec 24 at 15:21
add a comment |
While both tenses are idiomatic and correct, the choice between present perfect and past generally depends on the context.
If you had recently tested the program, you would be more likely to say I have tested....
If your statement related back to a test that you had carried out in the past (whether last month, last year or whatever) you are more likely to say I tested.... With the use of the past tense, one frequently gives the approximate date.
I tested the programme last week/month/year and it does work.
answered Dec 24 at 14:31
Ronald Sole
9,36211019
I've upvoted your answer because it's somewhat accurate, and even though recency is a factor – and I'd definitely say I tested would be used when that's not the case, and that perhaps you're not confident in the results anymore – it's not a decisive one. I've tested them can be said about something you did 2 years ago, but because there've been no changes to what you tested, you're confident that you still "have" that thing tested. That, I think, is what matters in this case.
– userr2684291
Dec 24 at 15:21
add a comment |
While both tenses are idiomatic and correct, the choice between present perfect and past generally depends on the context.
If you had recently tested the program, you would be more likely to say I have tested....
If your statement related back to a test that you had carried out in the past (whether last month, last year or whatever) you are more likely to say I tested.... With the use of the past tense, one frequently gives the approximate date.
I tested the programme last week/month/year and it does work.
answered Dec 24 at 14:31
Ronald Sole
9,36211019
While both tenses are idiomatic and correct, the choice between present perfect and past generally depends on the context.
If you had recently tested the program, you would be more likely to say I have tested....
If your statement related back to a test that you had carried out in the past (whether last month, last year or whatever) you are more likely to say I tested.... With the use of the past tense, one frequently gives the approximate date.
I tested the programme last week/month/year and it does work.
answered Dec 24 at 14:31
Ronald Sole
9,36211019
answered Dec 24 at 14:31
Ronald Sole
9,36211019
answered Dec 24 at 14:31
Ronald Sole
9,36211019
answered Dec 24 at 14:31
Ronald Sole
9,36211019
9,36211019
I've upvoted your answer because it's somewhat accurate, and even though recency is a factor – and I'd definitely say I tested would be used when that's not the case, and that perhaps you're not confident in the results anymore – it's not a decisive one. I've tested them can be said about something you did 2 years ago, but because there've been no changes to what you tested, you're confident that you still "have" that thing tested. That, I think, is what matters in this case.
– userr2684291
Dec 24 at 15:21
add a comment |
I've upvoted your answer because it's somewhat accurate, and even though recency is a factor – and I'd definitely say I tested would be used when that's not the case, and that perhaps you're not confident in the results anymore – it's not a decisive one. I've tested them can be said about something you did 2 years ago, but because there've been no changes to what you tested, you're confident that you still "have" that thing tested. That, I think, is what matters in this case.
– userr2684291
Dec 24 at 15:21
I've upvoted your answer because it's somewhat accurate, and even though recency is a factor – and I'd definitely say I tested would be used when that's not the case, and that perhaps you're not confident in the results anymore – it's not a decisive one. I've tested them can be said about something you did 2 years ago, but because there've been no changes to what you tested, you're confident that you still "have" that thing tested. That, I think, is what matters in this case.
– userr2684291
Dec 24 at 15:21
I've upvoted your answer because it's somewhat accurate, and even though recency is a factor – and I'd definitely say I tested would be used when that's not the case, and that perhaps you're not confident in the results anymore – it's not a decisive one. I've tested them can be said about something you did 2 years ago, but because there've been no changes to what you tested, you're confident that you still "have" that thing tested. That, I think, is what matters in this case.
– userr2684291
Dec 24 at 15:21
add a comment |
I wouldn't find either statement obviously wrong, or expect a native speaker not to say one of them, but they seem subtly different.
To me, saying:
I've tested the program with this input data and it does work.
emphasises that the program is, right now, in a tested state. Whereas:
I tested the program with this input data and it does work.
emphasizes a past event - you testing it. For that reason I'd prefer the first if you wanted to keep the 'and it does work', and simply 'I tested the program with this input data' (or 'I tested the program with this input data and it worked', or 'I tested the program with this input data this morning and it worked') if you were not sure that it still worked now.
I speak British English - US English seems to use the present perfect tense less often, so you may get different judgements from Americans.
answered Dec 24 at 17:12
Alex Hayward
611
New contributor
Alex Hayward is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
This is perhaps the best answer. The only difference is the simple past is a done deal and the present perfect is past but when is irrelevant. If you want to say when it was tested, you have to use the simple past. (By the way, this BrE versus AmE thing is simply not true, except for unschooled speakers).Somehow this myth has continued to spread around here like wildfire and it simply is not true.
– Lambie
Dec 24 at 18:26
1
@Lambie Regarding this "myth", The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language by Huddleston, Pullum, et al. says the following: "There are some relatively small-scale differences between AmE and BrE with respect to the choice between the present perfect and the simple preterite – cases where AmE may prefer a simple preterite where BrE requires a present perfect. One case concerns situations in the recent past, where I just saw them, for example, might be preferred in AmE, I've just seen them in BrE. Another case concerns the aspectual adjuncts already and yet."
– userr2684291
Dec 24 at 19:56
1
Of course, it is these small-scale differences that're pronounced due to the fact the described situations arise often (in speech in particular). So yes, I'd say AmE definitely uses the present perfect less frequently (in absolute numbers), but not across the board as far as the number of distinct uses of the present perfect goes. What I've quoted obviously doesn't apply here, so I'd say the caveat in the answer is a distraction.
– userr2684291
Dec 24 at 20:03
@userr2684291Yes, they can say what they like. I disagree with them. There are tons more people in North America than Britain, therefore, things tend to stand out. For me, all other things being equal (education, mostly), there is no difference there. I am American and hear the PP all the time. The idea it is "less used" is laughable. The more educated, the more proper use of PP you get. The less formally educated,the less standard use you get on both sides of the Atlantic.
– Lambie
Dec 24 at 21:10
@Lambie What do you mean by the more educated, the more PP? Native speakers usually don't need any education to use their language correctly.
– Alexey
Dec 26 at 11:12
|
show 1 more comment
I wouldn't find either statement obviously wrong, or expect a native speaker not to say one of them, but they seem subtly different.
To me, saying:
I've tested the program with this input data and it does work.
emphasises that the program is, right now, in a tested state. Whereas:
I tested the program with this input data and it does work.
emphasizes a past event - you testing it. For that reason I'd prefer the first if you wanted to keep the 'and it does work', and simply 'I tested the program with this input data' (or 'I tested the program with this input data and it worked', or 'I tested the program with this input data this morning and it worked') if you were not sure that it still worked now.
I speak British English - US English seems to use the present perfect tense less often, so you may get different judgements from Americans.
answered Dec 24 at 17:12
Alex Hayward
611
New contributor
Alex Hayward is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
This is perhaps the best answer. The only difference is the simple past is a done deal and the present perfect is past but when is irrelevant. If you want to say when it was tested, you have to use the simple past. (By the way, this BrE versus AmE thing is simply not true, except for unschooled speakers).Somehow this myth has continued to spread around here like wildfire and it simply is not true.
– Lambie
Dec 24 at 18:26
1
@Lambie Regarding this "myth", The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language by Huddleston, Pullum, et al. says the following: "There are some relatively small-scale differences between AmE and BrE with respect to the choice between the present perfect and the simple preterite – cases where AmE may prefer a simple preterite where BrE requires a present perfect. One case concerns situations in the recent past, where I just saw them, for example, might be preferred in AmE, I've just seen them in BrE. Another case concerns the aspectual adjuncts already and yet."
– userr2684291
Dec 24 at 19:56
1
Of course, it is these small-scale differences that're pronounced due to the fact the described situations arise often (in speech in particular). So yes, I'd say AmE definitely uses the present perfect less frequently (in absolute numbers), but not across the board as far as the number of distinct uses of the present perfect goes. What I've quoted obviously doesn't apply here, so I'd say the caveat in the answer is a distraction.
– userr2684291
Dec 24 at 20:03
@userr2684291Yes, they can say what they like. I disagree with them. There are tons more people in North America than Britain, therefore, things tend to stand out. For me, all other things being equal (education, mostly), there is no difference there. I am American and hear the PP all the time. The idea it is "less used" is laughable. The more educated, the more proper use of PP you get. The less formally educated,the less standard use you get on both sides of the Atlantic.
– Lambie
Dec 24 at 21:10
@Lambie What do you mean by the more educated, the more PP? Native speakers usually don't need any education to use their language correctly.
– Alexey
Dec 26 at 11:12
|
show 1 more comment
I wouldn't find either statement obviously wrong, or expect a native speaker not to say one of them, but they seem subtly different.
To me, saying:
I've tested the program with this input data and it does work.
emphasises that the program is, right now, in a tested state. Whereas:
I tested the program with this input data and it does work.
emphasizes a past event - you testing it. For that reason I'd prefer the first if you wanted to keep the 'and it does work', and simply 'I tested the program with this input data' (or 'I tested the program with this input data and it worked', or 'I tested the program with this input data this morning and it worked') if you were not sure that it still worked now.
I speak British English - US English seems to use the present perfect tense less often, so you may get different judgements from Americans.
answered Dec 24 at 17:12
Alex Hayward
611
New contributor
Alex Hayward is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I wouldn't find either statement obviously wrong, or expect a native speaker not to say one of them, but they seem subtly different.
To me, saying:
I've tested the program with this input data and it does work.
emphasises that the program is, right now, in a tested state. Whereas:
I tested the program with this input data and it does work.
emphasizes a past event - you testing it. For that reason I'd prefer the first if you wanted to keep the 'and it does work', and simply 'I tested the program with this input data' (or 'I tested the program with this input data and it worked', or 'I tested the program with this input data this morning and it worked') if you were not sure that it still worked now.
I speak British English - US English seems to use the present perfect tense less often, so you may get different judgements from Americans.
answered Dec 24 at 17:12
Alex Hayward
611
New contributor
Alex Hayward is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered Dec 24 at 17:12
Alex Hayward
611
New contributor
Alex Hayward is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered Dec 24 at 17:12
Alex Hayward
611
answered Dec 24 at 17:12
Alex Hayward
611
611
New contributor
Alex Hayward is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Alex Hayward is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Alex Hayward is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
This is perhaps the best answer. The only difference is the simple past is a done deal and the present perfect is past but when is irrelevant. If you want to say when it was tested, you have to use the simple past. (By the way, this BrE versus AmE thing is simply not true, except for unschooled speakers).Somehow this myth has continued to spread around here like wildfire and it simply is not true.
– Lambie
Dec 24 at 18:26
1
@Lambie Regarding this "myth", The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language by Huddleston, Pullum, et al. says the following: "There are some relatively small-scale differences between AmE and BrE with respect to the choice between the present perfect and the simple preterite – cases where AmE may prefer a simple preterite where BrE requires a present perfect. One case concerns situations in the recent past, where I just saw them, for example, might be preferred in AmE, I've just seen them in BrE. Another case concerns the aspectual adjuncts already and yet."
– userr2684291
Dec 24 at 19:56
1
Of course, it is these small-scale differences that're pronounced due to the fact the described situations arise often (in speech in particular). So yes, I'd say AmE definitely uses the present perfect less frequently (in absolute numbers), but not across the board as far as the number of distinct uses of the present perfect goes. What I've quoted obviously doesn't apply here, so I'd say the caveat in the answer is a distraction.
– userr2684291
Dec 24 at 20:03
@userr2684291Yes, they can say what they like. I disagree with them. There are tons more people in North America than Britain, therefore, things tend to stand out. For me, all other things being equal (education, mostly), there is no difference there. I am American and hear the PP all the time. The idea it is "less used" is laughable. The more educated, the more proper use of PP you get. The less formally educated,the less standard use you get on both sides of the Atlantic.
– Lambie
Dec 24 at 21:10
@Lambie What do you mean by the more educated, the more PP? Native speakers usually don't need any education to use their language correctly.
– Alexey
Dec 26 at 11:12
|
show 1 more comment
This is perhaps the best answer. The only difference is the simple past is a done deal and the present perfect is past but when is irrelevant. If you want to say when it was tested, you have to use the simple past. (By the way, this BrE versus AmE thing is simply not true, except for unschooled speakers).Somehow this myth has continued to spread around here like wildfire and it simply is not true.
– Lambie
Dec 24 at 18:26
1
@Lambie Regarding this "myth", The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language by Huddleston, Pullum, et al. says the following: "There are some relatively small-scale differences between AmE and BrE with respect to the choice between the present perfect and the simple preterite – cases where AmE may prefer a simple preterite where BrE requires a present perfect. One case concerns situations in the recent past, where I just saw them, for example, might be preferred in AmE, I've just seen them in BrE. Another case concerns the aspectual adjuncts already and yet."
– userr2684291
Dec 24 at 19:56
1
Of course, it is these small-scale differences that're pronounced due to the fact the described situations arise often (in speech in particular). So yes, I'd say AmE definitely uses the present perfect less frequently (in absolute numbers), but not across the board as far as the number of distinct uses of the present perfect goes. What I've quoted obviously doesn't apply here, so I'd say the caveat in the answer is a distraction.
– userr2684291
Dec 24 at 20:03
@userr2684291Yes, they can say what they like. I disagree with them. There are tons more people in North America than Britain, therefore, things tend to stand out. For me, all other things being equal (education, mostly), there is no difference there. I am American and hear the PP all the time. The idea it is "less used" is laughable. The more educated, the more proper use of PP you get. The less formally educated,the less standard use you get on both sides of the Atlantic.
– Lambie
Dec 24 at 21:10
@Lambie What do you mean by the more educated, the more PP? Native speakers usually don't need any education to use their language correctly.
– Alexey
Dec 26 at 11:12
This is perhaps the best answer. The only difference is the simple past is a done deal and the present perfect is past but when is irrelevant. If you want to say when it was tested, you have to use the simple past. (By the way, this BrE versus AmE thing is simply not true, except for unschooled speakers).Somehow this myth has continued to spread around here like wildfire and it simply is not true.
– Lambie
Dec 24 at 18:26
This is perhaps the best answer. The only difference is the simple past is a done deal and the present perfect is past but when is irrelevant. If you want to say when it was tested, you have to use the simple past. (By the way, this BrE versus AmE thing is simply not true, except for unschooled speakers).Somehow this myth has continued to spread around here like wildfire and it simply is not true.
– Lambie
Dec 24 at 18:26
1
1
@Lambie Regarding this "myth", The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language by Huddleston, Pullum, et al. says the following: "There are some relatively small-scale differences between AmE and BrE with respect to the choice between the present perfect and the simple preterite – cases where AmE may prefer a simple preterite where BrE requires a present perfect. One case concerns situations in the recent past, where I just saw them, for example, might be preferred in AmE, I've just seen them in BrE. Another case concerns the aspectual adjuncts already and yet."
– userr2684291
Dec 24 at 19:56
@Lambie Regarding this "myth", The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language by Huddleston, Pullum, et al. says the following: "There are some relatively small-scale differences between AmE and BrE with respect to the choice between the present perfect and the simple preterite – cases where AmE may prefer a simple preterite where BrE requires a present perfect. One case concerns situations in the recent past, where I just saw them, for example, might be preferred in AmE, I've just seen them in BrE. Another case concerns the aspectual adjuncts already and yet."
– userr2684291
Dec 24 at 19:56
1
1
Of course, it is these small-scale differences that're pronounced due to the fact the described situations arise often (in speech in particular). So yes, I'd say AmE definitely uses the present perfect less frequently (in absolute numbers), but not across the board as far as the number of distinct uses of the present perfect goes. What I've quoted obviously doesn't apply here, so I'd say the caveat in the answer is a distraction.
– userr2684291
Dec 24 at 20:03
Of course, it is these small-scale differences that're pronounced due to the fact the described situations arise often (in speech in particular). So yes, I'd say AmE definitely uses the present perfect less frequently (in absolute numbers), but not across the board as far as the number of distinct uses of the present perfect goes. What I've quoted obviously doesn't apply here, so I'd say the caveat in the answer is a distraction.
– userr2684291
Dec 24 at 20:03
@userr2684291Yes, they can say what they like. I disagree with them. There are tons more people in North America than Britain, therefore, things tend to stand out. For me, all other things being equal (education, mostly), there is no difference there. I am American and hear the PP all the time. The idea it is "less used" is laughable. The more educated, the more proper use of PP you get. The less formally educated,the less standard use you get on both sides of the Atlantic.
– Lambie
Dec 24 at 21:10
@userr2684291Yes, they can say what they like. I disagree with them. There are tons more people in North America than Britain, therefore, things tend to stand out. For me, all other things being equal (education, mostly), there is no difference there. I am American and hear the PP all the time. The idea it is "less used" is laughable. The more educated, the more proper use of PP you get. The less formally educated,the less standard use you get on both sides of the Atlantic.
– Lambie
Dec 24 at 21:10
@Lambie What do you mean by the more educated, the more PP? Native speakers usually don't need any education to use their language correctly.
– Alexey
Dec 26 at 11:12
@Lambie What do you mean by the more educated, the more PP? Native speakers usually don't need any education to use their language correctly.
– Alexey
Dec 26 at 11:12
|
show 1 more comment
Both are right but to me, this is more natural:
I have tested the program with this input data and it works.
answered Dec 24 at 13:14
Daniil Manokhin
1,26117
1
It is not true that one is more natural than the other.
– Lambie
Dec 24 at 19:42
If I say I tested the program and it does work, then there was some expectation that it wouldn’t. Saying I tested it and it works doesn’t carry that expectation.
– James
Dec 25 at 17:25
add a comment |
Both are right but to me, this is more natural:
I have tested the program with this input data and it works.
answered Dec 24 at 13:14
Daniil Manokhin
1,26117
1
It is not true that one is more natural than the other.
– Lambie
Dec 24 at 19:42
If I say I tested the program and it does work, then there was some expectation that it wouldn’t. Saying I tested it and it works doesn’t carry that expectation.
– James
Dec 25 at 17:25
add a comment |
Both are right but to me, this is more natural:
I have tested the program with this input data and it works.
answered Dec 24 at 13:14
Daniil Manokhin
1,26117
Both are right but to me, this is more natural:
I have tested the program with this input data and it works.
answered Dec 24 at 13:14
Daniil Manokhin
1,26117
answered Dec 24 at 13:14
Daniil Manokhin
1,26117
answered Dec 24 at 13:14
Daniil Manokhin
1,26117
answered Dec 24 at 13:14
Daniil Manokhin
1,26117
1,26117
1
It is not true that one is more natural than the other.
– Lambie
Dec 24 at 19:42
If I say I tested the program and it does work, then there was some expectation that it wouldn’t. Saying I tested it and it works doesn’t carry that expectation.
– James
Dec 25 at 17:25
add a comment |
1
It is not true that one is more natural than the other.
– Lambie
Dec 24 at 19:42
If I say I tested the program and it does work, then there was some expectation that it wouldn’t. Saying I tested it and it works doesn’t carry that expectation.
– James
Dec 25 at 17:25
1
1
It is not true that one is more natural than the other.
– Lambie
Dec 24 at 19:42
It is not true that one is more natural than the other.
– Lambie
Dec 24 at 19:42
If I say I tested the program and it does work, then there was some expectation that it wouldn’t. Saying I tested it and it works doesn’t carry that expectation.
– James
Dec 25 at 17:25
If I say I tested the program and it does work, then there was some expectation that it wouldn’t. Saying I tested it and it works doesn’t carry that expectation.
– James
Dec 25 at 17:25
add a comment |
The perfect aspect is used to indicate the state relative to some other time; in the case of present perfect, that time is now. So "I have tested" implies that while the testing was done in the past, it remains relevant, allowing one to follow with "it works" in the present tense: the act of testing was completed, and remains completed. Using the simple past put the action purely in the past, and doesn't imply anything about the current state; the simple past doesn't have the same connotation of it being completed as the present perfect does. So following it with the present tense is off; it should be "I tested it and it worked".
answered Dec 24 at 18:47
Acccumulation
1,06616
1
What about "Pat baked some cookies and they are delicious."?
– Scott
Dec 24 at 20:21
add a comment |
The perfect aspect is used to indicate the state relative to some other time; in the case of present perfect, that time is now. So "I have tested" implies that while the testing was done in the past, it remains relevant, allowing one to follow with "it works" in the present tense: the act of testing was completed, and remains completed. Using the simple past put the action purely in the past, and doesn't imply anything about the current state; the simple past doesn't have the same connotation of it being completed as the present perfect does. So following it with the present tense is off; it should be "I tested it and it worked".
answered Dec 24 at 18:47
Acccumulation
1,06616
1
What about "Pat baked some cookies and they are delicious."?
– Scott
Dec 24 at 20:21
add a comment |
The perfect aspect is used to indicate the state relative to some other time; in the case of present perfect, that time is now. So "I have tested" implies that while the testing was done in the past, it remains relevant, allowing one to follow with "it works" in the present tense: the act of testing was completed, and remains completed. Using the simple past put the action purely in the past, and doesn't imply anything about the current state; the simple past doesn't have the same connotation of it being completed as the present perfect does. So following it with the present tense is off; it should be "I tested it and it worked".
answered Dec 24 at 18:47
Acccumulation
1,06616
The perfect aspect is used to indicate the state relative to some other time; in the case of present perfect, that time is now. So "I have tested" implies that while the testing was done in the past, it remains relevant, allowing one to follow with "it works" in the present tense: the act of testing was completed, and remains completed. Using the simple past put the action purely in the past, and doesn't imply anything about the current state; the simple past doesn't have the same connotation of it being completed as the present perfect does. So following it with the present tense is off; it should be "I tested it and it worked".
answered Dec 24 at 18:47
Acccumulation
1,06616
answered Dec 24 at 18:47
Acccumulation
1,06616
answered Dec 24 at 18:47
Acccumulation
1,06616
answered Dec 24 at 18:47
Acccumulation
1,06616
1,06616
1
What about "Pat baked some cookies and they are delicious."?
– Scott
Dec 24 at 20:21
add a comment |
1
What about "Pat baked some cookies and they are delicious."?
– Scott
Dec 24 at 20:21
1
1
What about "Pat baked some cookies and they are delicious."?
– Scott
Dec 24 at 20:21
What about "Pat baked some cookies and they are delicious."?
– Scott
Dec 24 at 20:21
add a comment |
This is a computer-programmer's opinion, rather than a linguists answer, but I would only ever use
I tested the program with this input data and it worked.
(Emphasis added for clarity.)
answered Dec 24 at 19:12
ShapeOfMatter
112
New contributor
ShapeOfMatter is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
I have some sympathy for this point of view. But it raises the question: What's the purpose of testing if all it proves is that the product worked when you tested it? Testing is meant to ensure that the thing works now, and will continue to work. (Of course all bets are off if the program was modified after you tested it.)
– Scott
Dec 24 at 20:27
@Scott what you say is always true. Testing the program only means that it worked for the person who did the test, at that time. If there is a bug that causes random behaviour, it may work some times but not others, or it may only fail if you do a particular sequence of operations before the test. Personally, if I was talking to a user, I would probably say "...and it worked for me" to make it clear I wasn't challenging the fact that it didn't work for someone else, but implying that for some reason we must have done different things.
– alephzero
Dec 25 at 10:35
add a comment |
This is a computer-programmer's opinion, rather than a linguists answer, but I would only ever use
I tested the program with this input data and it worked.
(Emphasis added for clarity.)
answered Dec 24 at 19:12
ShapeOfMatter
112
New contributor
ShapeOfMatter is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
I have some sympathy for this point of view. But it raises the question: What's the purpose of testing if all it proves is that the product worked when you tested it? Testing is meant to ensure that the thing works now, and will continue to work. (Of course all bets are off if the program was modified after you tested it.)
– Scott
Dec 24 at 20:27
@Scott what you say is always true. Testing the program only means that it worked for the person who did the test, at that time. If there is a bug that causes random behaviour, it may work some times but not others, or it may only fail if you do a particular sequence of operations before the test. Personally, if I was talking to a user, I would probably say "...and it worked for me" to make it clear I wasn't challenging the fact that it didn't work for someone else, but implying that for some reason we must have done different things.
– alephzero
Dec 25 at 10:35
add a comment |
This is a computer-programmer's opinion, rather than a linguists answer, but I would only ever use
I tested the program with this input data and it worked.
(Emphasis added for clarity.)
answered Dec 24 at 19:12
ShapeOfMatter
112
New contributor
ShapeOfMatter is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
This is a computer-programmer's opinion, rather than a linguists answer, but I would only ever use
I tested the program with this input data and it worked.
(Emphasis added for clarity.)
answered Dec 24 at 19:12
ShapeOfMatter
112
New contributor
ShapeOfMatter is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered Dec 24 at 19:12
ShapeOfMatter
112
New contributor
ShapeOfMatter is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered Dec 24 at 19:12
ShapeOfMatter
112
answered Dec 24 at 19:12
ShapeOfMatter
112
112
New contributor
ShapeOfMatter is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
ShapeOfMatter is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
ShapeOfMatter is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
I have some sympathy for this point of view. But it raises the question: What's the purpose of testing if all it proves is that the product worked when you tested it? Testing is meant to ensure that the thing works now, and will continue to work. (Of course all bets are off if the program was modified after you tested it.)
– Scott
Dec 24 at 20:27
@Scott what you say is always true. Testing the program only means that it worked for the person who did the test, at that time. If there is a bug that causes random behaviour, it may work some times but not others, or it may only fail if you do a particular sequence of operations before the test. Personally, if I was talking to a user, I would probably say "...and it worked for me" to make it clear I wasn't challenging the fact that it didn't work for someone else, but implying that for some reason we must have done different things.
– alephzero
Dec 25 at 10:35
add a comment |
1
I have some sympathy for this point of view. But it raises the question: What's the purpose of testing if all it proves is that the product worked when you tested it? Testing is meant to ensure that the thing works now, and will continue to work. (Of course all bets are off if the program was modified after you tested it.)
– Scott
Dec 24 at 20:27
@Scott what you say is always true. Testing the program only means that it worked for the person who did the test, at that time. If there is a bug that causes random behaviour, it may work some times but not others, or it may only fail if you do a particular sequence of operations before the test. Personally, if I was talking to a user, I would probably say "...and it worked for me" to make it clear I wasn't challenging the fact that it didn't work for someone else, but implying that for some reason we must have done different things.
– alephzero
Dec 25 at 10:35
1
1
I have some sympathy for this point of view. But it raises the question: What's the purpose of testing if all it proves is that the product worked when you tested it? Testing is meant to ensure that the thing works now, and will continue to work. (Of course all bets are off if the program was modified after you tested it.)
– Scott
Dec 24 at 20:27
I have some sympathy for this point of view. But it raises the question: What's the purpose of testing if all it proves is that the product worked when you tested it? Testing is meant to ensure that the thing works now, and will continue to work. (Of course all bets are off if the program was modified after you tested it.)
– Scott
Dec 24 at 20:27
@Scott what you say is always true. Testing the program only means that it worked for the person who did the test, at that time. If there is a bug that causes random behaviour, it may work some times but not others, or it may only fail if you do a particular sequence of operations before the test. Personally, if I was talking to a user, I would probably say "...and it worked for me" to make it clear I wasn't challenging the fact that it didn't work for someone else, but implying that for some reason we must have done different things.
– alephzero
Dec 25 at 10:35
@Scott what you say is always true. Testing the program only means that it worked for the person who did the test, at that time. If there is a bug that causes random behaviour, it may work some times but not others, or it may only fail if you do a particular sequence of operations before the test. Personally, if I was talking to a user, I would probably say "...and it worked for me" to make it clear I wasn't challenging the fact that it didn't work for someone else, but implying that for some reason we must have done different things.
– alephzero
Dec 25 at 10:35
add a comment |
To answer your question simply, only the first variant of that sentence is correct. That being said, very many people will use the second, and since English is an ever-changing language there will probably come a point in the future, possibly a very close one where it will be considered correct. The reason only the first is correct is verb tense consistency. In other words, if a sentence starts in past simple, it stays in past simple; if it starts in present perfect, it stays in present perfect.
If you say, "I tested the program with this input data..." then your sentence is in past simple, and so the rest of the sentence should be as well. Therefore, "... and it does work." is the wrong tense. The correct ending to the sentence as started above would be, "... and it worked." The entire sentence is therefore in past simple.
Having said that, It's worth reiterating that it probably will be used like this about as much as it isn't. Naturalness does tend to win out over correctness, and then becomes correctness for as long as it takes for something else to feel natural.
answered Dec 24 at 17:49
Be Cn
71
New contributor
Be Cn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
@Lambie In your second sentence have read isn't a simple past tense.
– userr2684291
Dec 24 at 19:49
1
Either one is fine: I have read it and it is true. I read it and it is true. Different nuances, both grammatical.
– Lambie
Dec 24 at 21:12
Lambie was perfectly constructive and polite .. and correct. Your assertions in the answer are unfounded. There is nothing inherently wrong with using two tenses in a sentence when you're talking about two things. "I went to the doctor for a check-up, and I'm fine". There is an implied assumption that if you were fine when you went to the doctor then you're probably still fine now -- and we conventionally accept this as given. The same applies for the OP's phrase.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
Dec 25 at 0:33
add a comment |
To answer your question simply, only the first variant of that sentence is correct. That being said, very many people will use the second, and since English is an ever-changing language there will probably come a point in the future, possibly a very close one where it will be considered correct. The reason only the first is correct is verb tense consistency. In other words, if a sentence starts in past simple, it stays in past simple; if it starts in present perfect, it stays in present perfect.
If you say, "I tested the program with this input data..." then your sentence is in past simple, and so the rest of the sentence should be as well. Therefore, "... and it does work." is the wrong tense. The correct ending to the sentence as started above would be, "... and it worked." The entire sentence is therefore in past simple.
Having said that, It's worth reiterating that it probably will be used like this about as much as it isn't. Naturalness does tend to win out over correctness, and then becomes correctness for as long as it takes for something else to feel natural.
answered Dec 24 at 17:49
Be Cn
71
New contributor
Be Cn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
@Lambie In your second sentence have read isn't a simple past tense.
– userr2684291
Dec 24 at 19:49
1
Either one is fine: I have read it and it is true. I read it and it is true. Different nuances, both grammatical.
– Lambie
Dec 24 at 21:12
Lambie was perfectly constructive and polite .. and correct. Your assertions in the answer are unfounded. There is nothing inherently wrong with using two tenses in a sentence when you're talking about two things. "I went to the doctor for a check-up, and I'm fine". There is an implied assumption that if you were fine when you went to the doctor then you're probably still fine now -- and we conventionally accept this as given. The same applies for the OP's phrase.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
Dec 25 at 0:33
add a comment |
To answer your question simply, only the first variant of that sentence is correct. That being said, very many people will use the second, and since English is an ever-changing language there will probably come a point in the future, possibly a very close one where it will be considered correct. The reason only the first is correct is verb tense consistency. In other words, if a sentence starts in past simple, it stays in past simple; if it starts in present perfect, it stays in present perfect.
If you say, "I tested the program with this input data..." then your sentence is in past simple, and so the rest of the sentence should be as well. Therefore, "... and it does work." is the wrong tense. The correct ending to the sentence as started above would be, "... and it worked." The entire sentence is therefore in past simple.
Having said that, It's worth reiterating that it probably will be used like this about as much as it isn't. Naturalness does tend to win out over correctness, and then becomes correctness for as long as it takes for something else to feel natural.
answered Dec 24 at 17:49
Be Cn
71
New contributor
Be Cn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
To answer your question simply, only the first variant of that sentence is correct. That being said, very many people will use the second, and since English is an ever-changing language there will probably come a point in the future, possibly a very close one where it will be considered correct. The reason only the first is correct is verb tense consistency. In other words, if a sentence starts in past simple, it stays in past simple; if it starts in present perfect, it stays in present perfect.
If you say, "I tested the program with this input data..." then your sentence is in past simple, and so the rest of the sentence should be as well. Therefore, "... and it does work." is the wrong tense. The correct ending to the sentence as started above would be, "... and it worked." The entire sentence is therefore in past simple.
Having said that, It's worth reiterating that it probably will be used like this about as much as it isn't. Naturalness does tend to win out over correctness, and then becomes correctness for as long as it takes for something else to feel natural.
answered Dec 24 at 17:49
Be Cn
71
New contributor
Be Cn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered Dec 24 at 17:49
Be Cn
71
New contributor
Be Cn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered Dec 24 at 17:49
Be Cn
71
answered Dec 24 at 17:49
Be Cn
71
71
New contributor
Be Cn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Be Cn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Be Cn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
@Lambie In your second sentence have read isn't a simple past tense.
– userr2684291
Dec 24 at 19:49
1
Either one is fine: I have read it and it is true. I read it and it is true. Different nuances, both grammatical.
– Lambie
Dec 24 at 21:12
Lambie was perfectly constructive and polite .. and correct. Your assertions in the answer are unfounded. There is nothing inherently wrong with using two tenses in a sentence when you're talking about two things. "I went to the doctor for a check-up, and I'm fine". There is an implied assumption that if you were fine when you went to the doctor then you're probably still fine now -- and we conventionally accept this as given. The same applies for the OP's phrase.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
Dec 25 at 0:33
add a comment |
1
@Lambie In your second sentence have read isn't a simple past tense.
– userr2684291
Dec 24 at 19:49
1
Either one is fine: I have read it and it is true. I read it and it is true. Different nuances, both grammatical.
– Lambie
Dec 24 at 21:12
Lambie was perfectly constructive and polite .. and correct. Your assertions in the answer are unfounded. There is nothing inherently wrong with using two tenses in a sentence when you're talking about two things. "I went to the doctor for a check-up, and I'm fine". There is an implied assumption that if you were fine when you went to the doctor then you're probably still fine now -- and we conventionally accept this as given. The same applies for the OP's phrase.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
Dec 25 at 0:33
1
1
@Lambie In your second sentence have read isn't a simple past tense.
– userr2684291
Dec 24 at 19:49
@Lambie In your second sentence have read isn't a simple past tense.
– userr2684291
Dec 24 at 19:49
1
1
Either one is fine: I have read it and it is true. I read it and it is true. Different nuances, both grammatical.
– Lambie
Dec 24 at 21:12
Either one is fine: I have read it and it is true. I read it and it is true. Different nuances, both grammatical.
– Lambie
Dec 24 at 21:12
Lambie was perfectly constructive and polite .. and correct. Your assertions in the answer are unfounded. There is nothing inherently wrong with using two tenses in a sentence when you're talking about two things. "I went to the doctor for a check-up, and I'm fine". There is an implied assumption that if you were fine when you went to the doctor then you're probably still fine now -- and we conventionally accept this as given. The same applies for the OP's phrase.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
Dec 25 at 0:33
Lambie was perfectly constructive and polite .. and correct. Your assertions in the answer are unfounded. There is nothing inherently wrong with using two tenses in a sentence when you're talking about two things. "I went to the doctor for a check-up, and I'm fine". There is an implied assumption that if you were fine when you went to the doctor then you're probably still fine now -- and we conventionally accept this as given. The same applies for the OP's phrase.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
Dec 25 at 0:33
add a comment |
Alexey is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Alexey is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Alexey is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Alexey is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f190621%2fproper-tense-in-ive-tested-the-program-with-this-input-data-and-it-works%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Since nobody has mentioned it yet, you can shorten "and it does work" to "and it works". A speaker won't usually need to add the word does unless it's contrary to the context, like if your sentence came right after somebody said "it doesn't work, right?"
– person27
Dec 25 at 6:51
@person27 - We could also say, “I tested the program with this input data and it worked."
– J.R.♦
Dec 25 at 12:46