Why doesn't the Earth accelerate towards us?












10












$begingroup$


According to Newton's third law of motion that states that every action has an equal and opposite reaction.



So, if the Earth exerts a gravitational pull on us (people) then even we should exert a force equal and opposite (in terms of direction) on the Earth.



It is intuitive to think that this force is really small to get the Earth to move. But, if we take a look at the second law of motion that states that F = ma we see that however small the force, there will be some amount of acceleration. Therefore, even though we exert a very small gravitational force on the Earth it should be enough to get the Earth to move even though the acceleration is a very small amount.



But what I said clearly does not happen. So there must be some flaw with my reasoning. What is that flaw?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Aditya Bharadwaj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$








  • 44




    $begingroup$
    What do you mean that it clearly does not happen? If the acceleration is exceptionally tiny (because the mass is exceptionally large), then maybe you just don't notice?
    $endgroup$
    – Steeven
    18 hours ago






  • 18




    $begingroup$
    You say "this thing should happen, but it clearly does not". You should get out of that habit as a scientist. Better: "this thing should happen, I will compute the expected effect and either design an experiment that confirms or denies the expectation, or explain why such an experiment is infeasible given my budget".
    $endgroup$
    – Eric Lippert
    11 hours ago






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    @EricLippert From now I will try to be a better scientists by not making assumptions that are not supported by hard evidence
    $endgroup$
    – Aditya Bharadwaj
    11 hours ago








  • 4




    $begingroup$
    "or explain why such an experiment is infeasible given my budget" I've heard funding of science is being cut all the time, but I hope we can still afford to jump!
    $endgroup$
    – JiK
    11 hours ago






  • 8




    $begingroup$
    That's great. While you are thinking about this problem: unlike you, the moon is hanging over the earth, and unlike you, the moon does have enough mass to seriously pull on something the mass of the earth. Is the earth observed to accelerate towards the moon?
    $endgroup$
    – Eric Lippert
    11 hours ago
















10












$begingroup$


According to Newton's third law of motion that states that every action has an equal and opposite reaction.



So, if the Earth exerts a gravitational pull on us (people) then even we should exert a force equal and opposite (in terms of direction) on the Earth.



It is intuitive to think that this force is really small to get the Earth to move. But, if we take a look at the second law of motion that states that F = ma we see that however small the force, there will be some amount of acceleration. Therefore, even though we exert a very small gravitational force on the Earth it should be enough to get the Earth to move even though the acceleration is a very small amount.



But what I said clearly does not happen. So there must be some flaw with my reasoning. What is that flaw?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Aditya Bharadwaj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$








  • 44




    $begingroup$
    What do you mean that it clearly does not happen? If the acceleration is exceptionally tiny (because the mass is exceptionally large), then maybe you just don't notice?
    $endgroup$
    – Steeven
    18 hours ago






  • 18




    $begingroup$
    You say "this thing should happen, but it clearly does not". You should get out of that habit as a scientist. Better: "this thing should happen, I will compute the expected effect and either design an experiment that confirms or denies the expectation, or explain why such an experiment is infeasible given my budget".
    $endgroup$
    – Eric Lippert
    11 hours ago






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    @EricLippert From now I will try to be a better scientists by not making assumptions that are not supported by hard evidence
    $endgroup$
    – Aditya Bharadwaj
    11 hours ago








  • 4




    $begingroup$
    "or explain why such an experiment is infeasible given my budget" I've heard funding of science is being cut all the time, but I hope we can still afford to jump!
    $endgroup$
    – JiK
    11 hours ago






  • 8




    $begingroup$
    That's great. While you are thinking about this problem: unlike you, the moon is hanging over the earth, and unlike you, the moon does have enough mass to seriously pull on something the mass of the earth. Is the earth observed to accelerate towards the moon?
    $endgroup$
    – Eric Lippert
    11 hours ago














10












10








10


4



$begingroup$


According to Newton's third law of motion that states that every action has an equal and opposite reaction.



So, if the Earth exerts a gravitational pull on us (people) then even we should exert a force equal and opposite (in terms of direction) on the Earth.



It is intuitive to think that this force is really small to get the Earth to move. But, if we take a look at the second law of motion that states that F = ma we see that however small the force, there will be some amount of acceleration. Therefore, even though we exert a very small gravitational force on the Earth it should be enough to get the Earth to move even though the acceleration is a very small amount.



But what I said clearly does not happen. So there must be some flaw with my reasoning. What is that flaw?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Aditya Bharadwaj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




According to Newton's third law of motion that states that every action has an equal and opposite reaction.



So, if the Earth exerts a gravitational pull on us (people) then even we should exert a force equal and opposite (in terms of direction) on the Earth.



It is intuitive to think that this force is really small to get the Earth to move. But, if we take a look at the second law of motion that states that F = ma we see that however small the force, there will be some amount of acceleration. Therefore, even though we exert a very small gravitational force on the Earth it should be enough to get the Earth to move even though the acceleration is a very small amount.



But what I said clearly does not happen. So there must be some flaw with my reasoning. What is that flaw?







newtonian-mechanics forces newtonian-gravity reference-frames acceleration






share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Aditya Bharadwaj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Aditya Bharadwaj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 6 hours ago









Peter Mortensen

1,93211323




1,93211323






New contributor




Aditya Bharadwaj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 18 hours ago









Aditya BharadwajAditya Bharadwaj

7515




7515




New contributor




Aditya Bharadwaj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Aditya Bharadwaj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Aditya Bharadwaj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 44




    $begingroup$
    What do you mean that it clearly does not happen? If the acceleration is exceptionally tiny (because the mass is exceptionally large), then maybe you just don't notice?
    $endgroup$
    – Steeven
    18 hours ago






  • 18




    $begingroup$
    You say "this thing should happen, but it clearly does not". You should get out of that habit as a scientist. Better: "this thing should happen, I will compute the expected effect and either design an experiment that confirms or denies the expectation, or explain why such an experiment is infeasible given my budget".
    $endgroup$
    – Eric Lippert
    11 hours ago






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    @EricLippert From now I will try to be a better scientists by not making assumptions that are not supported by hard evidence
    $endgroup$
    – Aditya Bharadwaj
    11 hours ago








  • 4




    $begingroup$
    "or explain why such an experiment is infeasible given my budget" I've heard funding of science is being cut all the time, but I hope we can still afford to jump!
    $endgroup$
    – JiK
    11 hours ago






  • 8




    $begingroup$
    That's great. While you are thinking about this problem: unlike you, the moon is hanging over the earth, and unlike you, the moon does have enough mass to seriously pull on something the mass of the earth. Is the earth observed to accelerate towards the moon?
    $endgroup$
    – Eric Lippert
    11 hours ago














  • 44




    $begingroup$
    What do you mean that it clearly does not happen? If the acceleration is exceptionally tiny (because the mass is exceptionally large), then maybe you just don't notice?
    $endgroup$
    – Steeven
    18 hours ago






  • 18




    $begingroup$
    You say "this thing should happen, but it clearly does not". You should get out of that habit as a scientist. Better: "this thing should happen, I will compute the expected effect and either design an experiment that confirms or denies the expectation, or explain why such an experiment is infeasible given my budget".
    $endgroup$
    – Eric Lippert
    11 hours ago






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    @EricLippert From now I will try to be a better scientists by not making assumptions that are not supported by hard evidence
    $endgroup$
    – Aditya Bharadwaj
    11 hours ago








  • 4




    $begingroup$
    "or explain why such an experiment is infeasible given my budget" I've heard funding of science is being cut all the time, but I hope we can still afford to jump!
    $endgroup$
    – JiK
    11 hours ago






  • 8




    $begingroup$
    That's great. While you are thinking about this problem: unlike you, the moon is hanging over the earth, and unlike you, the moon does have enough mass to seriously pull on something the mass of the earth. Is the earth observed to accelerate towards the moon?
    $endgroup$
    – Eric Lippert
    11 hours ago








44




44




$begingroup$
What do you mean that it clearly does not happen? If the acceleration is exceptionally tiny (because the mass is exceptionally large), then maybe you just don't notice?
$endgroup$
– Steeven
18 hours ago




$begingroup$
What do you mean that it clearly does not happen? If the acceleration is exceptionally tiny (because the mass is exceptionally large), then maybe you just don't notice?
$endgroup$
– Steeven
18 hours ago




18




18




$begingroup$
You say "this thing should happen, but it clearly does not". You should get out of that habit as a scientist. Better: "this thing should happen, I will compute the expected effect and either design an experiment that confirms or denies the expectation, or explain why such an experiment is infeasible given my budget".
$endgroup$
– Eric Lippert
11 hours ago




$begingroup$
You say "this thing should happen, but it clearly does not". You should get out of that habit as a scientist. Better: "this thing should happen, I will compute the expected effect and either design an experiment that confirms or denies the expectation, or explain why such an experiment is infeasible given my budget".
$endgroup$
– Eric Lippert
11 hours ago




5




5




$begingroup$
@EricLippert From now I will try to be a better scientists by not making assumptions that are not supported by hard evidence
$endgroup$
– Aditya Bharadwaj
11 hours ago






$begingroup$
@EricLippert From now I will try to be a better scientists by not making assumptions that are not supported by hard evidence
$endgroup$
– Aditya Bharadwaj
11 hours ago






4




4




$begingroup$
"or explain why such an experiment is infeasible given my budget" I've heard funding of science is being cut all the time, but I hope we can still afford to jump!
$endgroup$
– JiK
11 hours ago




$begingroup$
"or explain why such an experiment is infeasible given my budget" I've heard funding of science is being cut all the time, but I hope we can still afford to jump!
$endgroup$
– JiK
11 hours ago




8




8




$begingroup$
That's great. While you are thinking about this problem: unlike you, the moon is hanging over the earth, and unlike you, the moon does have enough mass to seriously pull on something the mass of the earth. Is the earth observed to accelerate towards the moon?
$endgroup$
– Eric Lippert
11 hours ago




$begingroup$
That's great. While you are thinking about this problem: unlike you, the moon is hanging over the earth, and unlike you, the moon does have enough mass to seriously pull on something the mass of the earth. Is the earth observed to accelerate towards the moon?
$endgroup$
– Eric Lippert
11 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















60












$begingroup$

The acceleration that your gravitational pull causes in the Earth is tiny, tiny, tiny because the Earth's mass is enormous. If your mass is, say, $70;mathrm{kg}$, then you cause an acceleration of $aapprox 1.1times 10^{-22};mathrm{m/s^2}$.



A tiny, tiny, tiny acceleration does not necessarily mean a tiny, tiny, tiny speed, since, as you mention in comments, the velocity accumulates. True. It doesn't necessarily mean that - but in this case it does. The speed gained after 1 year at this acceleration is only $vapprox 3.6×10^{-15};mathrm{m/s}$. And after a lifetime of 100 years it is still only around $vapprox 3.6×10^{-13};mathrm{m/s}$.



If all 7.6 billion people on the planet suddenly lifted off of Earth and stayed hanging in the air on the same side of the planet for 100 years, the planet would reach no more than $vapprox 2.8times 10^{-3};mathrm{m/s}$; that is around 3 millimeters-per-second in this obscure scenario of 100 years and billions of people's masses.





Now, with all that being said, note that I have to assumed that all those people are not just standing on the ground - they must be levitating above the ground.



Because, while levitating (i.e. during free-fall), they only exert the gravitational force $F_g$:



$$sum F=maquadLeftrightarrowquad F_g=ma$$



and there is a net acceleration. But when standing on the ground, they also exert a downwards pushing force which is their weight $w$:



$$sum F=maquadLeftrightarrowquad F_g-w=ma$$



Now there are two forces on the Earth, pushing in opposite directions. And in fact, that force called weight exactly equals the gravitational force (because those two are the action-reaction pair from Newton's 3rd law). So the above formula gives zero acceleration. The forces cancel out and nothing accelerates any further.



In general, any system can never accelerate purely by it's own internal forces. If we consider the Earth-and-people as one system, then their gravitational forces on each other are internal. Each part of the system may move individually - the Earth can move towards the people and the free-falling people can move towards the Earth. But the system as a whole - defined by the centre-of-mass of the system - will not move anywhere.



So, the Earth can move a tiny, tiny, tiny bit towards you while you move a much larger distance towards the Earth during your free-fall so the combined centre-of-mass is still stationary. But when standing on the ground, nothing can move because that would require you to break through the ground and move inwards into the Earth. If the Earth was moving but you weren't, then the centre of mass would be moving (accelerating) and that is simply impossible. The system would be gaining kinetic energy without any external energy input; creating free energy out of thin air is just not possible. So this never happens.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 6




    $begingroup$
    Alright so if I am standing on the Earth's surface then I get squeezed to the Earth's surface and exert a pushing force on the Earth's surface that cancels out the pulling gravitational force that I exert on the Earth. If I somehow manage to levitate then the velocity will take a really really really long time to build up for us to notice.
    $endgroup$
    – Aditya Bharadwaj
    17 hours ago








  • 4




    $begingroup$
    @AdityaBharadwaj Exactly.
    $endgroup$
    – Steeven
    17 hours ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @Aditya note also that, unless you're at the North or South poles, if you were levitating over a constant spot of the ground, then the acceleration you'd cause on the Earth would be rotating once a day, and the bulk of the contributions would cancel, as the velocity accumulated during the day would point opposite to that accumulated at night. Only the North-South component, proportional to the sine of your latitude, would survive.
    $endgroup$
    – Emilio Pisanty
    16 hours ago






  • 9




    $begingroup$
    Reminds me on what-if.xkcd.com/8
    $endgroup$
    – Holger
    16 hours ago






  • 9




    $begingroup$
    @AdityaBharadwaj Also consider that if you jump up from the surface of the planet you are first pushing Earth away from you. As you fall back to earth you return to each other and end up right back where you started. To effect any real delta-V you have to have some mass (or at least momentum) leaving the system. So long as we remain at the surface we can't leave the system and if we can't leave the system then we can't effect an outside acceleration on it. A spaceship to the moon, though, would effect a net acceleration as it leaves the earth completely and less of it returns than what left.
    $endgroup$
    – J...
    15 hours ago





















4












$begingroup$

Short answer, it does. It's just too small for you to notice. So, why isn't it noticeable?



The earth doesn't noticeably move towards you despite your gravitational pull because you're resting on it, the same way you don't move towards the center of the earth if you have stable footing on its surface.



If you're not standing on it (e.g. skydiving, or in orbit) then the earth does start to move towards you (or, if you jump up, move in the opposite direction of your body). But since the earth's acceleration imparted by you is so very small, although it's calculable, it's basically immeasurable. As @Steeven calculated, a 70Kg person would impart an acceleration of $aapprox 1.1times 10^{-22};mathrm{m/s^2}$ which isn't noticeable with our human perception.



Adding to the very small levels of acceleration, one more reason you don't notice earth's movement is that many, many things happen on earth. It's optimistic/unrealistic to model the earth as a perfectly rigid body, but let's do it for the sake of this example: there's so much stuff happening all around earth, each imparting a small acceleration on the whole body (cranes lifting things, mines being excavated with explosives, landslides and avalanches, earthquakes etc.) that even if we were able to measure the tiny acceleration that you exert on earth it would be near impossible to isolate the impact that you have from all the noise created by everything else.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    what if everyone on earth somehow accumulate on one region on the Earth's surface and jump together.During their jump , would the net force of all the people be enough to cause a noticeable acceleration of the Earth?
    $endgroup$
    – Aditya Bharadwaj
    12 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    @AdityaBharadwaj there's a Vsauce video on youtube answering the very question! youtube.com/watch?v=jHbyQ_AQP8c if you don't know the chanel I encourage you to check it out.
    $endgroup$
    – Alexandre Aubrey
    12 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @AdityaBharadwaj there's 7.53B people on earth, with average mass of ~65.5Kg, meaning the total mass of all humans is 4.93x10^11Kg. Earth's mass is 5.97x10^24, several orders of magnitude mroe than us. If we assume everyone jumps 40cm up at the same time, the earth would move down 3.3x10^-14m. As we fall down, the earth would also move towards us and the total displacement (after all that) will be 0. But yes, the earth would move a tiny bit, but not a significant amount due to just how much heavier earth is than humans.
    $endgroup$
    – Alexandre Aubrey
    12 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @AdityaBharadwaj There's also an XKCD on it: what-if.xkcd.com/8 Short answer: almost everyone dies of starvation.
    $endgroup$
    – Acccumulation
    8 hours ago



















2












$begingroup$

From newtons third law we know one thing.
Every action has an equal and opposite reaction.
This means that the force we act on earth is equal to the force that the earth acts on us.



This means



f = ma ( by person )



The average mass of a person is 70 kg and acceleration due to gravity is nearly 10 m/s^2.



So the force we apply on earth is nearly 700 N.



Now



F = MA ( by earth)



The aproximate mass of earth is 6 × 10^24 kg.
But the force remains 700 N



Now A = F/M



A = 700 / 6* 10^24.



=> ~ 116 * 10^-24 m/s^2.


That acceleration applied by one person is so miniscule that it does not need to be considered.



The acceleration of earth is in negative powers of 24 . So we need more that just billions of people to accelerate the earth upwards.






share|cite|improve this answer








New contributor




Xosmos is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "151"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });






    Aditya Bharadwaj is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f454332%2fwhy-doesnt-the-earth-accelerate-towards-us%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    60












    $begingroup$

    The acceleration that your gravitational pull causes in the Earth is tiny, tiny, tiny because the Earth's mass is enormous. If your mass is, say, $70;mathrm{kg}$, then you cause an acceleration of $aapprox 1.1times 10^{-22};mathrm{m/s^2}$.



    A tiny, tiny, tiny acceleration does not necessarily mean a tiny, tiny, tiny speed, since, as you mention in comments, the velocity accumulates. True. It doesn't necessarily mean that - but in this case it does. The speed gained after 1 year at this acceleration is only $vapprox 3.6×10^{-15};mathrm{m/s}$. And after a lifetime of 100 years it is still only around $vapprox 3.6×10^{-13};mathrm{m/s}$.



    If all 7.6 billion people on the planet suddenly lifted off of Earth and stayed hanging in the air on the same side of the planet for 100 years, the planet would reach no more than $vapprox 2.8times 10^{-3};mathrm{m/s}$; that is around 3 millimeters-per-second in this obscure scenario of 100 years and billions of people's masses.





    Now, with all that being said, note that I have to assumed that all those people are not just standing on the ground - they must be levitating above the ground.



    Because, while levitating (i.e. during free-fall), they only exert the gravitational force $F_g$:



    $$sum F=maquadLeftrightarrowquad F_g=ma$$



    and there is a net acceleration. But when standing on the ground, they also exert a downwards pushing force which is their weight $w$:



    $$sum F=maquadLeftrightarrowquad F_g-w=ma$$



    Now there are two forces on the Earth, pushing in opposite directions. And in fact, that force called weight exactly equals the gravitational force (because those two are the action-reaction pair from Newton's 3rd law). So the above formula gives zero acceleration. The forces cancel out and nothing accelerates any further.



    In general, any system can never accelerate purely by it's own internal forces. If we consider the Earth-and-people as one system, then their gravitational forces on each other are internal. Each part of the system may move individually - the Earth can move towards the people and the free-falling people can move towards the Earth. But the system as a whole - defined by the centre-of-mass of the system - will not move anywhere.



    So, the Earth can move a tiny, tiny, tiny bit towards you while you move a much larger distance towards the Earth during your free-fall so the combined centre-of-mass is still stationary. But when standing on the ground, nothing can move because that would require you to break through the ground and move inwards into the Earth. If the Earth was moving but you weren't, then the centre of mass would be moving (accelerating) and that is simply impossible. The system would be gaining kinetic energy without any external energy input; creating free energy out of thin air is just not possible. So this never happens.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 6




      $begingroup$
      Alright so if I am standing on the Earth's surface then I get squeezed to the Earth's surface and exert a pushing force on the Earth's surface that cancels out the pulling gravitational force that I exert on the Earth. If I somehow manage to levitate then the velocity will take a really really really long time to build up for us to notice.
      $endgroup$
      – Aditya Bharadwaj
      17 hours ago








    • 4




      $begingroup$
      @AdityaBharadwaj Exactly.
      $endgroup$
      – Steeven
      17 hours ago






    • 3




      $begingroup$
      @Aditya note also that, unless you're at the North or South poles, if you were levitating over a constant spot of the ground, then the acceleration you'd cause on the Earth would be rotating once a day, and the bulk of the contributions would cancel, as the velocity accumulated during the day would point opposite to that accumulated at night. Only the North-South component, proportional to the sine of your latitude, would survive.
      $endgroup$
      – Emilio Pisanty
      16 hours ago






    • 9




      $begingroup$
      Reminds me on what-if.xkcd.com/8
      $endgroup$
      – Holger
      16 hours ago






    • 9




      $begingroup$
      @AdityaBharadwaj Also consider that if you jump up from the surface of the planet you are first pushing Earth away from you. As you fall back to earth you return to each other and end up right back where you started. To effect any real delta-V you have to have some mass (or at least momentum) leaving the system. So long as we remain at the surface we can't leave the system and if we can't leave the system then we can't effect an outside acceleration on it. A spaceship to the moon, though, would effect a net acceleration as it leaves the earth completely and less of it returns than what left.
      $endgroup$
      – J...
      15 hours ago


















    60












    $begingroup$

    The acceleration that your gravitational pull causes in the Earth is tiny, tiny, tiny because the Earth's mass is enormous. If your mass is, say, $70;mathrm{kg}$, then you cause an acceleration of $aapprox 1.1times 10^{-22};mathrm{m/s^2}$.



    A tiny, tiny, tiny acceleration does not necessarily mean a tiny, tiny, tiny speed, since, as you mention in comments, the velocity accumulates. True. It doesn't necessarily mean that - but in this case it does. The speed gained after 1 year at this acceleration is only $vapprox 3.6×10^{-15};mathrm{m/s}$. And after a lifetime of 100 years it is still only around $vapprox 3.6×10^{-13};mathrm{m/s}$.



    If all 7.6 billion people on the planet suddenly lifted off of Earth and stayed hanging in the air on the same side of the planet for 100 years, the planet would reach no more than $vapprox 2.8times 10^{-3};mathrm{m/s}$; that is around 3 millimeters-per-second in this obscure scenario of 100 years and billions of people's masses.





    Now, with all that being said, note that I have to assumed that all those people are not just standing on the ground - they must be levitating above the ground.



    Because, while levitating (i.e. during free-fall), they only exert the gravitational force $F_g$:



    $$sum F=maquadLeftrightarrowquad F_g=ma$$



    and there is a net acceleration. But when standing on the ground, they also exert a downwards pushing force which is their weight $w$:



    $$sum F=maquadLeftrightarrowquad F_g-w=ma$$



    Now there are two forces on the Earth, pushing in opposite directions. And in fact, that force called weight exactly equals the gravitational force (because those two are the action-reaction pair from Newton's 3rd law). So the above formula gives zero acceleration. The forces cancel out and nothing accelerates any further.



    In general, any system can never accelerate purely by it's own internal forces. If we consider the Earth-and-people as one system, then their gravitational forces on each other are internal. Each part of the system may move individually - the Earth can move towards the people and the free-falling people can move towards the Earth. But the system as a whole - defined by the centre-of-mass of the system - will not move anywhere.



    So, the Earth can move a tiny, tiny, tiny bit towards you while you move a much larger distance towards the Earth during your free-fall so the combined centre-of-mass is still stationary. But when standing on the ground, nothing can move because that would require you to break through the ground and move inwards into the Earth. If the Earth was moving but you weren't, then the centre of mass would be moving (accelerating) and that is simply impossible. The system would be gaining kinetic energy without any external energy input; creating free energy out of thin air is just not possible. So this never happens.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 6




      $begingroup$
      Alright so if I am standing on the Earth's surface then I get squeezed to the Earth's surface and exert a pushing force on the Earth's surface that cancels out the pulling gravitational force that I exert on the Earth. If I somehow manage to levitate then the velocity will take a really really really long time to build up for us to notice.
      $endgroup$
      – Aditya Bharadwaj
      17 hours ago








    • 4




      $begingroup$
      @AdityaBharadwaj Exactly.
      $endgroup$
      – Steeven
      17 hours ago






    • 3




      $begingroup$
      @Aditya note also that, unless you're at the North or South poles, if you were levitating over a constant spot of the ground, then the acceleration you'd cause on the Earth would be rotating once a day, and the bulk of the contributions would cancel, as the velocity accumulated during the day would point opposite to that accumulated at night. Only the North-South component, proportional to the sine of your latitude, would survive.
      $endgroup$
      – Emilio Pisanty
      16 hours ago






    • 9




      $begingroup$
      Reminds me on what-if.xkcd.com/8
      $endgroup$
      – Holger
      16 hours ago






    • 9




      $begingroup$
      @AdityaBharadwaj Also consider that if you jump up from the surface of the planet you are first pushing Earth away from you. As you fall back to earth you return to each other and end up right back where you started. To effect any real delta-V you have to have some mass (or at least momentum) leaving the system. So long as we remain at the surface we can't leave the system and if we can't leave the system then we can't effect an outside acceleration on it. A spaceship to the moon, though, would effect a net acceleration as it leaves the earth completely and less of it returns than what left.
      $endgroup$
      – J...
      15 hours ago
















    60












    60








    60





    $begingroup$

    The acceleration that your gravitational pull causes in the Earth is tiny, tiny, tiny because the Earth's mass is enormous. If your mass is, say, $70;mathrm{kg}$, then you cause an acceleration of $aapprox 1.1times 10^{-22};mathrm{m/s^2}$.



    A tiny, tiny, tiny acceleration does not necessarily mean a tiny, tiny, tiny speed, since, as you mention in comments, the velocity accumulates. True. It doesn't necessarily mean that - but in this case it does. The speed gained after 1 year at this acceleration is only $vapprox 3.6×10^{-15};mathrm{m/s}$. And after a lifetime of 100 years it is still only around $vapprox 3.6×10^{-13};mathrm{m/s}$.



    If all 7.6 billion people on the planet suddenly lifted off of Earth and stayed hanging in the air on the same side of the planet for 100 years, the planet would reach no more than $vapprox 2.8times 10^{-3};mathrm{m/s}$; that is around 3 millimeters-per-second in this obscure scenario of 100 years and billions of people's masses.





    Now, with all that being said, note that I have to assumed that all those people are not just standing on the ground - they must be levitating above the ground.



    Because, while levitating (i.e. during free-fall), they only exert the gravitational force $F_g$:



    $$sum F=maquadLeftrightarrowquad F_g=ma$$



    and there is a net acceleration. But when standing on the ground, they also exert a downwards pushing force which is their weight $w$:



    $$sum F=maquadLeftrightarrowquad F_g-w=ma$$



    Now there are two forces on the Earth, pushing in opposite directions. And in fact, that force called weight exactly equals the gravitational force (because those two are the action-reaction pair from Newton's 3rd law). So the above formula gives zero acceleration. The forces cancel out and nothing accelerates any further.



    In general, any system can never accelerate purely by it's own internal forces. If we consider the Earth-and-people as one system, then their gravitational forces on each other are internal. Each part of the system may move individually - the Earth can move towards the people and the free-falling people can move towards the Earth. But the system as a whole - defined by the centre-of-mass of the system - will not move anywhere.



    So, the Earth can move a tiny, tiny, tiny bit towards you while you move a much larger distance towards the Earth during your free-fall so the combined centre-of-mass is still stationary. But when standing on the ground, nothing can move because that would require you to break through the ground and move inwards into the Earth. If the Earth was moving but you weren't, then the centre of mass would be moving (accelerating) and that is simply impossible. The system would be gaining kinetic energy without any external energy input; creating free energy out of thin air is just not possible. So this never happens.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    The acceleration that your gravitational pull causes in the Earth is tiny, tiny, tiny because the Earth's mass is enormous. If your mass is, say, $70;mathrm{kg}$, then you cause an acceleration of $aapprox 1.1times 10^{-22};mathrm{m/s^2}$.



    A tiny, tiny, tiny acceleration does not necessarily mean a tiny, tiny, tiny speed, since, as you mention in comments, the velocity accumulates. True. It doesn't necessarily mean that - but in this case it does. The speed gained after 1 year at this acceleration is only $vapprox 3.6×10^{-15};mathrm{m/s}$. And after a lifetime of 100 years it is still only around $vapprox 3.6×10^{-13};mathrm{m/s}$.



    If all 7.6 billion people on the planet suddenly lifted off of Earth and stayed hanging in the air on the same side of the planet for 100 years, the planet would reach no more than $vapprox 2.8times 10^{-3};mathrm{m/s}$; that is around 3 millimeters-per-second in this obscure scenario of 100 years and billions of people's masses.





    Now, with all that being said, note that I have to assumed that all those people are not just standing on the ground - they must be levitating above the ground.



    Because, while levitating (i.e. during free-fall), they only exert the gravitational force $F_g$:



    $$sum F=maquadLeftrightarrowquad F_g=ma$$



    and there is a net acceleration. But when standing on the ground, they also exert a downwards pushing force which is their weight $w$:



    $$sum F=maquadLeftrightarrowquad F_g-w=ma$$



    Now there are two forces on the Earth, pushing in opposite directions. And in fact, that force called weight exactly equals the gravitational force (because those two are the action-reaction pair from Newton's 3rd law). So the above formula gives zero acceleration. The forces cancel out and nothing accelerates any further.



    In general, any system can never accelerate purely by it's own internal forces. If we consider the Earth-and-people as one system, then their gravitational forces on each other are internal. Each part of the system may move individually - the Earth can move towards the people and the free-falling people can move towards the Earth. But the system as a whole - defined by the centre-of-mass of the system - will not move anywhere.



    So, the Earth can move a tiny, tiny, tiny bit towards you while you move a much larger distance towards the Earth during your free-fall so the combined centre-of-mass is still stationary. But when standing on the ground, nothing can move because that would require you to break through the ground and move inwards into the Earth. If the Earth was moving but you weren't, then the centre of mass would be moving (accelerating) and that is simply impossible. The system would be gaining kinetic energy without any external energy input; creating free energy out of thin air is just not possible. So this never happens.







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited 15 hours ago

























    answered 18 hours ago









    SteevenSteeven

    26.4k563108




    26.4k563108








    • 6




      $begingroup$
      Alright so if I am standing on the Earth's surface then I get squeezed to the Earth's surface and exert a pushing force on the Earth's surface that cancels out the pulling gravitational force that I exert on the Earth. If I somehow manage to levitate then the velocity will take a really really really long time to build up for us to notice.
      $endgroup$
      – Aditya Bharadwaj
      17 hours ago








    • 4




      $begingroup$
      @AdityaBharadwaj Exactly.
      $endgroup$
      – Steeven
      17 hours ago






    • 3




      $begingroup$
      @Aditya note also that, unless you're at the North or South poles, if you were levitating over a constant spot of the ground, then the acceleration you'd cause on the Earth would be rotating once a day, and the bulk of the contributions would cancel, as the velocity accumulated during the day would point opposite to that accumulated at night. Only the North-South component, proportional to the sine of your latitude, would survive.
      $endgroup$
      – Emilio Pisanty
      16 hours ago






    • 9




      $begingroup$
      Reminds me on what-if.xkcd.com/8
      $endgroup$
      – Holger
      16 hours ago






    • 9




      $begingroup$
      @AdityaBharadwaj Also consider that if you jump up from the surface of the planet you are first pushing Earth away from you. As you fall back to earth you return to each other and end up right back where you started. To effect any real delta-V you have to have some mass (or at least momentum) leaving the system. So long as we remain at the surface we can't leave the system and if we can't leave the system then we can't effect an outside acceleration on it. A spaceship to the moon, though, would effect a net acceleration as it leaves the earth completely and less of it returns than what left.
      $endgroup$
      – J...
      15 hours ago
















    • 6




      $begingroup$
      Alright so if I am standing on the Earth's surface then I get squeezed to the Earth's surface and exert a pushing force on the Earth's surface that cancels out the pulling gravitational force that I exert on the Earth. If I somehow manage to levitate then the velocity will take a really really really long time to build up for us to notice.
      $endgroup$
      – Aditya Bharadwaj
      17 hours ago








    • 4




      $begingroup$
      @AdityaBharadwaj Exactly.
      $endgroup$
      – Steeven
      17 hours ago






    • 3




      $begingroup$
      @Aditya note also that, unless you're at the North or South poles, if you were levitating over a constant spot of the ground, then the acceleration you'd cause on the Earth would be rotating once a day, and the bulk of the contributions would cancel, as the velocity accumulated during the day would point opposite to that accumulated at night. Only the North-South component, proportional to the sine of your latitude, would survive.
      $endgroup$
      – Emilio Pisanty
      16 hours ago






    • 9




      $begingroup$
      Reminds me on what-if.xkcd.com/8
      $endgroup$
      – Holger
      16 hours ago






    • 9




      $begingroup$
      @AdityaBharadwaj Also consider that if you jump up from the surface of the planet you are first pushing Earth away from you. As you fall back to earth you return to each other and end up right back where you started. To effect any real delta-V you have to have some mass (or at least momentum) leaving the system. So long as we remain at the surface we can't leave the system and if we can't leave the system then we can't effect an outside acceleration on it. A spaceship to the moon, though, would effect a net acceleration as it leaves the earth completely and less of it returns than what left.
      $endgroup$
      – J...
      15 hours ago










    6




    6




    $begingroup$
    Alright so if I am standing on the Earth's surface then I get squeezed to the Earth's surface and exert a pushing force on the Earth's surface that cancels out the pulling gravitational force that I exert on the Earth. If I somehow manage to levitate then the velocity will take a really really really long time to build up for us to notice.
    $endgroup$
    – Aditya Bharadwaj
    17 hours ago






    $begingroup$
    Alright so if I am standing on the Earth's surface then I get squeezed to the Earth's surface and exert a pushing force on the Earth's surface that cancels out the pulling gravitational force that I exert on the Earth. If I somehow manage to levitate then the velocity will take a really really really long time to build up for us to notice.
    $endgroup$
    – Aditya Bharadwaj
    17 hours ago






    4




    4




    $begingroup$
    @AdityaBharadwaj Exactly.
    $endgroup$
    – Steeven
    17 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    @AdityaBharadwaj Exactly.
    $endgroup$
    – Steeven
    17 hours ago




    3




    3




    $begingroup$
    @Aditya note also that, unless you're at the North or South poles, if you were levitating over a constant spot of the ground, then the acceleration you'd cause on the Earth would be rotating once a day, and the bulk of the contributions would cancel, as the velocity accumulated during the day would point opposite to that accumulated at night. Only the North-South component, proportional to the sine of your latitude, would survive.
    $endgroup$
    – Emilio Pisanty
    16 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    @Aditya note also that, unless you're at the North or South poles, if you were levitating over a constant spot of the ground, then the acceleration you'd cause on the Earth would be rotating once a day, and the bulk of the contributions would cancel, as the velocity accumulated during the day would point opposite to that accumulated at night. Only the North-South component, proportional to the sine of your latitude, would survive.
    $endgroup$
    – Emilio Pisanty
    16 hours ago




    9




    9




    $begingroup$
    Reminds me on what-if.xkcd.com/8
    $endgroup$
    – Holger
    16 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    Reminds me on what-if.xkcd.com/8
    $endgroup$
    – Holger
    16 hours ago




    9




    9




    $begingroup$
    @AdityaBharadwaj Also consider that if you jump up from the surface of the planet you are first pushing Earth away from you. As you fall back to earth you return to each other and end up right back where you started. To effect any real delta-V you have to have some mass (or at least momentum) leaving the system. So long as we remain at the surface we can't leave the system and if we can't leave the system then we can't effect an outside acceleration on it. A spaceship to the moon, though, would effect a net acceleration as it leaves the earth completely and less of it returns than what left.
    $endgroup$
    – J...
    15 hours ago






    $begingroup$
    @AdityaBharadwaj Also consider that if you jump up from the surface of the planet you are first pushing Earth away from you. As you fall back to earth you return to each other and end up right back where you started. To effect any real delta-V you have to have some mass (or at least momentum) leaving the system. So long as we remain at the surface we can't leave the system and if we can't leave the system then we can't effect an outside acceleration on it. A spaceship to the moon, though, would effect a net acceleration as it leaves the earth completely and less of it returns than what left.
    $endgroup$
    – J...
    15 hours ago













    4












    $begingroup$

    Short answer, it does. It's just too small for you to notice. So, why isn't it noticeable?



    The earth doesn't noticeably move towards you despite your gravitational pull because you're resting on it, the same way you don't move towards the center of the earth if you have stable footing on its surface.



    If you're not standing on it (e.g. skydiving, or in orbit) then the earth does start to move towards you (or, if you jump up, move in the opposite direction of your body). But since the earth's acceleration imparted by you is so very small, although it's calculable, it's basically immeasurable. As @Steeven calculated, a 70Kg person would impart an acceleration of $aapprox 1.1times 10^{-22};mathrm{m/s^2}$ which isn't noticeable with our human perception.



    Adding to the very small levels of acceleration, one more reason you don't notice earth's movement is that many, many things happen on earth. It's optimistic/unrealistic to model the earth as a perfectly rigid body, but let's do it for the sake of this example: there's so much stuff happening all around earth, each imparting a small acceleration on the whole body (cranes lifting things, mines being excavated with explosives, landslides and avalanches, earthquakes etc.) that even if we were able to measure the tiny acceleration that you exert on earth it would be near impossible to isolate the impact that you have from all the noise created by everything else.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      what if everyone on earth somehow accumulate on one region on the Earth's surface and jump together.During their jump , would the net force of all the people be enough to cause a noticeable acceleration of the Earth?
      $endgroup$
      – Aditya Bharadwaj
      12 hours ago












    • $begingroup$
      @AdityaBharadwaj there's a Vsauce video on youtube answering the very question! youtube.com/watch?v=jHbyQ_AQP8c if you don't know the chanel I encourage you to check it out.
      $endgroup$
      – Alexandre Aubrey
      12 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @AdityaBharadwaj there's 7.53B people on earth, with average mass of ~65.5Kg, meaning the total mass of all humans is 4.93x10^11Kg. Earth's mass is 5.97x10^24, several orders of magnitude mroe than us. If we assume everyone jumps 40cm up at the same time, the earth would move down 3.3x10^-14m. As we fall down, the earth would also move towards us and the total displacement (after all that) will be 0. But yes, the earth would move a tiny bit, but not a significant amount due to just how much heavier earth is than humans.
      $endgroup$
      – Alexandre Aubrey
      12 hours ago






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @AdityaBharadwaj There's also an XKCD on it: what-if.xkcd.com/8 Short answer: almost everyone dies of starvation.
      $endgroup$
      – Acccumulation
      8 hours ago
















    4












    $begingroup$

    Short answer, it does. It's just too small for you to notice. So, why isn't it noticeable?



    The earth doesn't noticeably move towards you despite your gravitational pull because you're resting on it, the same way you don't move towards the center of the earth if you have stable footing on its surface.



    If you're not standing on it (e.g. skydiving, or in orbit) then the earth does start to move towards you (or, if you jump up, move in the opposite direction of your body). But since the earth's acceleration imparted by you is so very small, although it's calculable, it's basically immeasurable. As @Steeven calculated, a 70Kg person would impart an acceleration of $aapprox 1.1times 10^{-22};mathrm{m/s^2}$ which isn't noticeable with our human perception.



    Adding to the very small levels of acceleration, one more reason you don't notice earth's movement is that many, many things happen on earth. It's optimistic/unrealistic to model the earth as a perfectly rigid body, but let's do it for the sake of this example: there's so much stuff happening all around earth, each imparting a small acceleration on the whole body (cranes lifting things, mines being excavated with explosives, landslides and avalanches, earthquakes etc.) that even if we were able to measure the tiny acceleration that you exert on earth it would be near impossible to isolate the impact that you have from all the noise created by everything else.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      what if everyone on earth somehow accumulate on one region on the Earth's surface and jump together.During their jump , would the net force of all the people be enough to cause a noticeable acceleration of the Earth?
      $endgroup$
      – Aditya Bharadwaj
      12 hours ago












    • $begingroup$
      @AdityaBharadwaj there's a Vsauce video on youtube answering the very question! youtube.com/watch?v=jHbyQ_AQP8c if you don't know the chanel I encourage you to check it out.
      $endgroup$
      – Alexandre Aubrey
      12 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @AdityaBharadwaj there's 7.53B people on earth, with average mass of ~65.5Kg, meaning the total mass of all humans is 4.93x10^11Kg. Earth's mass is 5.97x10^24, several orders of magnitude mroe than us. If we assume everyone jumps 40cm up at the same time, the earth would move down 3.3x10^-14m. As we fall down, the earth would also move towards us and the total displacement (after all that) will be 0. But yes, the earth would move a tiny bit, but not a significant amount due to just how much heavier earth is than humans.
      $endgroup$
      – Alexandre Aubrey
      12 hours ago






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @AdityaBharadwaj There's also an XKCD on it: what-if.xkcd.com/8 Short answer: almost everyone dies of starvation.
      $endgroup$
      – Acccumulation
      8 hours ago














    4












    4








    4





    $begingroup$

    Short answer, it does. It's just too small for you to notice. So, why isn't it noticeable?



    The earth doesn't noticeably move towards you despite your gravitational pull because you're resting on it, the same way you don't move towards the center of the earth if you have stable footing on its surface.



    If you're not standing on it (e.g. skydiving, or in orbit) then the earth does start to move towards you (or, if you jump up, move in the opposite direction of your body). But since the earth's acceleration imparted by you is so very small, although it's calculable, it's basically immeasurable. As @Steeven calculated, a 70Kg person would impart an acceleration of $aapprox 1.1times 10^{-22};mathrm{m/s^2}$ which isn't noticeable with our human perception.



    Adding to the very small levels of acceleration, one more reason you don't notice earth's movement is that many, many things happen on earth. It's optimistic/unrealistic to model the earth as a perfectly rigid body, but let's do it for the sake of this example: there's so much stuff happening all around earth, each imparting a small acceleration on the whole body (cranes lifting things, mines being excavated with explosives, landslides and avalanches, earthquakes etc.) that even if we were able to measure the tiny acceleration that you exert on earth it would be near impossible to isolate the impact that you have from all the noise created by everything else.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    Short answer, it does. It's just too small for you to notice. So, why isn't it noticeable?



    The earth doesn't noticeably move towards you despite your gravitational pull because you're resting on it, the same way you don't move towards the center of the earth if you have stable footing on its surface.



    If you're not standing on it (e.g. skydiving, or in orbit) then the earth does start to move towards you (or, if you jump up, move in the opposite direction of your body). But since the earth's acceleration imparted by you is so very small, although it's calculable, it's basically immeasurable. As @Steeven calculated, a 70Kg person would impart an acceleration of $aapprox 1.1times 10^{-22};mathrm{m/s^2}$ which isn't noticeable with our human perception.



    Adding to the very small levels of acceleration, one more reason you don't notice earth's movement is that many, many things happen on earth. It's optimistic/unrealistic to model the earth as a perfectly rigid body, but let's do it for the sake of this example: there's so much stuff happening all around earth, each imparting a small acceleration on the whole body (cranes lifting things, mines being excavated with explosives, landslides and avalanches, earthquakes etc.) that even if we were able to measure the tiny acceleration that you exert on earth it would be near impossible to isolate the impact that you have from all the noise created by everything else.







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered 12 hours ago









    Alexandre AubreyAlexandre Aubrey

    1785




    1785












    • $begingroup$
      what if everyone on earth somehow accumulate on one region on the Earth's surface and jump together.During their jump , would the net force of all the people be enough to cause a noticeable acceleration of the Earth?
      $endgroup$
      – Aditya Bharadwaj
      12 hours ago












    • $begingroup$
      @AdityaBharadwaj there's a Vsauce video on youtube answering the very question! youtube.com/watch?v=jHbyQ_AQP8c if you don't know the chanel I encourage you to check it out.
      $endgroup$
      – Alexandre Aubrey
      12 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @AdityaBharadwaj there's 7.53B people on earth, with average mass of ~65.5Kg, meaning the total mass of all humans is 4.93x10^11Kg. Earth's mass is 5.97x10^24, several orders of magnitude mroe than us. If we assume everyone jumps 40cm up at the same time, the earth would move down 3.3x10^-14m. As we fall down, the earth would also move towards us and the total displacement (after all that) will be 0. But yes, the earth would move a tiny bit, but not a significant amount due to just how much heavier earth is than humans.
      $endgroup$
      – Alexandre Aubrey
      12 hours ago






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @AdityaBharadwaj There's also an XKCD on it: what-if.xkcd.com/8 Short answer: almost everyone dies of starvation.
      $endgroup$
      – Acccumulation
      8 hours ago


















    • $begingroup$
      what if everyone on earth somehow accumulate on one region on the Earth's surface and jump together.During their jump , would the net force of all the people be enough to cause a noticeable acceleration of the Earth?
      $endgroup$
      – Aditya Bharadwaj
      12 hours ago












    • $begingroup$
      @AdityaBharadwaj there's a Vsauce video on youtube answering the very question! youtube.com/watch?v=jHbyQ_AQP8c if you don't know the chanel I encourage you to check it out.
      $endgroup$
      – Alexandre Aubrey
      12 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @AdityaBharadwaj there's 7.53B people on earth, with average mass of ~65.5Kg, meaning the total mass of all humans is 4.93x10^11Kg. Earth's mass is 5.97x10^24, several orders of magnitude mroe than us. If we assume everyone jumps 40cm up at the same time, the earth would move down 3.3x10^-14m. As we fall down, the earth would also move towards us and the total displacement (after all that) will be 0. But yes, the earth would move a tiny bit, but not a significant amount due to just how much heavier earth is than humans.
      $endgroup$
      – Alexandre Aubrey
      12 hours ago






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @AdityaBharadwaj There's also an XKCD on it: what-if.xkcd.com/8 Short answer: almost everyone dies of starvation.
      $endgroup$
      – Acccumulation
      8 hours ago
















    $begingroup$
    what if everyone on earth somehow accumulate on one region on the Earth's surface and jump together.During their jump , would the net force of all the people be enough to cause a noticeable acceleration of the Earth?
    $endgroup$
    – Aditya Bharadwaj
    12 hours ago






    $begingroup$
    what if everyone on earth somehow accumulate on one region on the Earth's surface and jump together.During their jump , would the net force of all the people be enough to cause a noticeable acceleration of the Earth?
    $endgroup$
    – Aditya Bharadwaj
    12 hours ago














    $begingroup$
    @AdityaBharadwaj there's a Vsauce video on youtube answering the very question! youtube.com/watch?v=jHbyQ_AQP8c if you don't know the chanel I encourage you to check it out.
    $endgroup$
    – Alexandre Aubrey
    12 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    @AdityaBharadwaj there's a Vsauce video on youtube answering the very question! youtube.com/watch?v=jHbyQ_AQP8c if you don't know the chanel I encourage you to check it out.
    $endgroup$
    – Alexandre Aubrey
    12 hours ago




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    @AdityaBharadwaj there's 7.53B people on earth, with average mass of ~65.5Kg, meaning the total mass of all humans is 4.93x10^11Kg. Earth's mass is 5.97x10^24, several orders of magnitude mroe than us. If we assume everyone jumps 40cm up at the same time, the earth would move down 3.3x10^-14m. As we fall down, the earth would also move towards us and the total displacement (after all that) will be 0. But yes, the earth would move a tiny bit, but not a significant amount due to just how much heavier earth is than humans.
    $endgroup$
    – Alexandre Aubrey
    12 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    @AdityaBharadwaj there's 7.53B people on earth, with average mass of ~65.5Kg, meaning the total mass of all humans is 4.93x10^11Kg. Earth's mass is 5.97x10^24, several orders of magnitude mroe than us. If we assume everyone jumps 40cm up at the same time, the earth would move down 3.3x10^-14m. As we fall down, the earth would also move towards us and the total displacement (after all that) will be 0. But yes, the earth would move a tiny bit, but not a significant amount due to just how much heavier earth is than humans.
    $endgroup$
    – Alexandre Aubrey
    12 hours ago




    2




    2




    $begingroup$
    @AdityaBharadwaj There's also an XKCD on it: what-if.xkcd.com/8 Short answer: almost everyone dies of starvation.
    $endgroup$
    – Acccumulation
    8 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    @AdityaBharadwaj There's also an XKCD on it: what-if.xkcd.com/8 Short answer: almost everyone dies of starvation.
    $endgroup$
    – Acccumulation
    8 hours ago











    2












    $begingroup$

    From newtons third law we know one thing.
    Every action has an equal and opposite reaction.
    This means that the force we act on earth is equal to the force that the earth acts on us.



    This means



    f = ma ( by person )



    The average mass of a person is 70 kg and acceleration due to gravity is nearly 10 m/s^2.



    So the force we apply on earth is nearly 700 N.



    Now



    F = MA ( by earth)



    The aproximate mass of earth is 6 × 10^24 kg.
    But the force remains 700 N



    Now A = F/M



    A = 700 / 6* 10^24.



    => ~ 116 * 10^-24 m/s^2.


    That acceleration applied by one person is so miniscule that it does not need to be considered.



    The acceleration of earth is in negative powers of 24 . So we need more that just billions of people to accelerate the earth upwards.






    share|cite|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Xosmos is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$


















      2












      $begingroup$

      From newtons third law we know one thing.
      Every action has an equal and opposite reaction.
      This means that the force we act on earth is equal to the force that the earth acts on us.



      This means



      f = ma ( by person )



      The average mass of a person is 70 kg and acceleration due to gravity is nearly 10 m/s^2.



      So the force we apply on earth is nearly 700 N.



      Now



      F = MA ( by earth)



      The aproximate mass of earth is 6 × 10^24 kg.
      But the force remains 700 N



      Now A = F/M



      A = 700 / 6* 10^24.



      => ~ 116 * 10^-24 m/s^2.


      That acceleration applied by one person is so miniscule that it does not need to be considered.



      The acceleration of earth is in negative powers of 24 . So we need more that just billions of people to accelerate the earth upwards.






      share|cite|improve this answer








      New contributor




      Xosmos is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      $endgroup$
















        2












        2








        2





        $begingroup$

        From newtons third law we know one thing.
        Every action has an equal and opposite reaction.
        This means that the force we act on earth is equal to the force that the earth acts on us.



        This means



        f = ma ( by person )



        The average mass of a person is 70 kg and acceleration due to gravity is nearly 10 m/s^2.



        So the force we apply on earth is nearly 700 N.



        Now



        F = MA ( by earth)



        The aproximate mass of earth is 6 × 10^24 kg.
        But the force remains 700 N



        Now A = F/M



        A = 700 / 6* 10^24.



        => ~ 116 * 10^-24 m/s^2.


        That acceleration applied by one person is so miniscule that it does not need to be considered.



        The acceleration of earth is in negative powers of 24 . So we need more that just billions of people to accelerate the earth upwards.






        share|cite|improve this answer








        New contributor




        Xosmos is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        $endgroup$



        From newtons third law we know one thing.
        Every action has an equal and opposite reaction.
        This means that the force we act on earth is equal to the force that the earth acts on us.



        This means



        f = ma ( by person )



        The average mass of a person is 70 kg and acceleration due to gravity is nearly 10 m/s^2.



        So the force we apply on earth is nearly 700 N.



        Now



        F = MA ( by earth)



        The aproximate mass of earth is 6 × 10^24 kg.
        But the force remains 700 N



        Now A = F/M



        A = 700 / 6* 10^24.



        => ~ 116 * 10^-24 m/s^2.


        That acceleration applied by one person is so miniscule that it does not need to be considered.



        The acceleration of earth is in negative powers of 24 . So we need more that just billions of people to accelerate the earth upwards.







        share|cite|improve this answer








        New contributor




        Xosmos is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer






        New contributor




        Xosmos is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        answered 10 hours ago









        XosmosXosmos

        211




        211




        New contributor




        Xosmos is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.





        New contributor





        Xosmos is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        Xosmos is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






















            Aditya Bharadwaj is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            Aditya Bharadwaj is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













            Aditya Bharadwaj is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Aditya Bharadwaj is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















            Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f454332%2fwhy-doesnt-the-earth-accelerate-towards-us%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Сан-Квентин

            Алькесар

            Josef Freinademetz