Why do LCR meter manufacturers give the details of measurement frequency to us?
$begingroup$
When you want to purchase a DMM, more probably you don't see at what frequency the DMM you considered would work, but in the situation you're considering to purchase an LCR meter, manufacturers give you big details on the frequency of the LCR meter.
- Why do they give us the details on the frequency of their LCR meter?
- It seems that they gives us the measurement frequency for all of three components. Resistors, inductors, and capacitors. Okay, but how the best frequency be chosen for each one of these components?
Here is several links to some LCR manufacturers:
IET/QuadTech 7600 Plus Precision LCR Meter
Lutron LCR-9184
HIOKI IM3536
CEM DT-9935
MS5308
measurement multimeter tools instrumentation lcr-meter
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
When you want to purchase a DMM, more probably you don't see at what frequency the DMM you considered would work, but in the situation you're considering to purchase an LCR meter, manufacturers give you big details on the frequency of the LCR meter.
- Why do they give us the details on the frequency of their LCR meter?
- It seems that they gives us the measurement frequency for all of three components. Resistors, inductors, and capacitors. Okay, but how the best frequency be chosen for each one of these components?
Here is several links to some LCR manufacturers:
IET/QuadTech 7600 Plus Precision LCR Meter
Lutron LCR-9184
HIOKI IM3536
CEM DT-9935
MS5308
measurement multimeter tools instrumentation lcr-meter
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
When you want to purchase a DMM, more probably you don't see at what frequency the DMM you considered would work, but in the situation you're considering to purchase an LCR meter, manufacturers give you big details on the frequency of the LCR meter.
- Why do they give us the details on the frequency of their LCR meter?
- It seems that they gives us the measurement frequency for all of three components. Resistors, inductors, and capacitors. Okay, but how the best frequency be chosen for each one of these components?
Here is several links to some LCR manufacturers:
IET/QuadTech 7600 Plus Precision LCR Meter
Lutron LCR-9184
HIOKI IM3536
CEM DT-9935
MS5308
measurement multimeter tools instrumentation lcr-meter
$endgroup$
When you want to purchase a DMM, more probably you don't see at what frequency the DMM you considered would work, but in the situation you're considering to purchase an LCR meter, manufacturers give you big details on the frequency of the LCR meter.
- Why do they give us the details on the frequency of their LCR meter?
- It seems that they gives us the measurement frequency for all of three components. Resistors, inductors, and capacitors. Okay, but how the best frequency be chosen for each one of these components?
Here is several links to some LCR manufacturers:
IET/QuadTech 7600 Plus Precision LCR Meter
Lutron LCR-9184
HIOKI IM3536
CEM DT-9935
MS5308
measurement multimeter tools instrumentation lcr-meter
measurement multimeter tools instrumentation lcr-meter
edited 8 hours ago
laptop2d
23.7k123276
23.7k123276
asked 20 hours ago
RohRoh
2,82752767
2,82752767
add a comment |
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
They give you the details, because for real-world components there isn't one concrete value; they are all dependent on the operating frequency to a greater or lesser extent.
The best frequency will depend on your application. Ideally it would be the same as your target operating frequency.
For example, if you are measuring an SMPS inductor then a high frequency will be more useful (as your circuit operating frequency is likely to be high), an electrolytic capacitor would be best measured at a lower frequency (as they don't have, and you wouldn't design expecting them to have, good high-frequency performance) and a line-frequency choke would be best measured even lower.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
And the good stuff (HP 4192A and the like) often have programmable frequency over a fairly large range, there is significant value in this capability given the (sometimes very) non ideal behaviour of real parts.
$endgroup$
– Dan Mills
13 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If we consider a real inductor there are several factors to take into consideration.
The windings have resistance
There is capacitance between turns
The permeability of the core is frequency dependent.
As such, trying to produce a single figure for inductance is difficult and the result will vary depending on the measurement frequency.
Similar arguments exist for why a capacitor or resistor is frequency dependent too.
Since the answer varies with frequency the manufacturer has to tell you the test frequency.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It is a matter of the expected user knowledge and the intended market.
Any good DMM will specify very clearly what is the operating frequency range, the measured signal characteristics, and the DMM parasitics. Some DMMs even have 'fast displays' that operate at a different bandwidth than the slower digits, these will be clearly specified in the marketing material itself. Some markings will only be understood by the experienced user, e.g.: "True RMS".
So it is not true that DMMs don't specify these characteristics, look at the low-end general purpose Fluke 114 marketing pamphlet. It is clearly seen that it is designed for signals below 1kHz. Although they do not specify loading impedance, you can go to the user's manual to find that. (BTW: the models just above this one, 115 & 117, measure capacitance by applying a known charge and measuring voltage, these do not use a frequency sweep).
But this is a general-purpose low-cost (for a Fluke) automotive and household multimeter, it is not really intended for the electronics professional. If you look further up their extensive and expensive DMM product line you will find more detailed and specialized specifications, geared towards one market or another.
When it comes to an inductor or capacitor these are far from ideal components, their actual value will depend on many factors. Temperature, DC bias, applied signal magnitude, and yes, test frequency. Depending on the application some of these factors will be important while others will not. Test instruments are designed with these factors in mind.
That is, the instrument specifications will strongly depend on the intended market. The market for most LCR meters is not your common household as it is the case for the cheaper DMMs. You cannot really compare a $10 disposable multimeter with a $6000 professional LCR meter.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
When you look at manufacturer's specifications for inductance you will sometimes see odd-ball test frequencies. e.g. 7.7 MHz, 25 MHz, 2.5 MHz. These are an artifact of the old Boonton/Hewlett Packard Q-meter. In the old Q-meter you measured inductance by determining the resonance point of the test inductance with a variable capacitor. The dial on the variable capacitor was calibrated in picofarads. But in addition, the dial was calibrated in inductance (mH, uH, nH). The calibration for inductance was only good at specific frequencies. So at 2.5 MHz the dial would show 100pF as well as 40.6uH. These would be another set of inductance numbers on the dial for 7.7 MHz (4.3uH).
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("schematics", function () {
StackExchange.schematics.init();
});
}, "cicuitlab");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "135"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f417067%2fwhy-do-lcr-meter-manufacturers-give-the-details-of-measurement-frequency-to-us%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
They give you the details, because for real-world components there isn't one concrete value; they are all dependent on the operating frequency to a greater or lesser extent.
The best frequency will depend on your application. Ideally it would be the same as your target operating frequency.
For example, if you are measuring an SMPS inductor then a high frequency will be more useful (as your circuit operating frequency is likely to be high), an electrolytic capacitor would be best measured at a lower frequency (as they don't have, and you wouldn't design expecting them to have, good high-frequency performance) and a line-frequency choke would be best measured even lower.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
And the good stuff (HP 4192A and the like) often have programmable frequency over a fairly large range, there is significant value in this capability given the (sometimes very) non ideal behaviour of real parts.
$endgroup$
– Dan Mills
13 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
They give you the details, because for real-world components there isn't one concrete value; they are all dependent on the operating frequency to a greater or lesser extent.
The best frequency will depend on your application. Ideally it would be the same as your target operating frequency.
For example, if you are measuring an SMPS inductor then a high frequency will be more useful (as your circuit operating frequency is likely to be high), an electrolytic capacitor would be best measured at a lower frequency (as they don't have, and you wouldn't design expecting them to have, good high-frequency performance) and a line-frequency choke would be best measured even lower.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
And the good stuff (HP 4192A and the like) often have programmable frequency over a fairly large range, there is significant value in this capability given the (sometimes very) non ideal behaviour of real parts.
$endgroup$
– Dan Mills
13 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
They give you the details, because for real-world components there isn't one concrete value; they are all dependent on the operating frequency to a greater or lesser extent.
The best frequency will depend on your application. Ideally it would be the same as your target operating frequency.
For example, if you are measuring an SMPS inductor then a high frequency will be more useful (as your circuit operating frequency is likely to be high), an electrolytic capacitor would be best measured at a lower frequency (as they don't have, and you wouldn't design expecting them to have, good high-frequency performance) and a line-frequency choke would be best measured even lower.
$endgroup$
They give you the details, because for real-world components there isn't one concrete value; they are all dependent on the operating frequency to a greater or lesser extent.
The best frequency will depend on your application. Ideally it would be the same as your target operating frequency.
For example, if you are measuring an SMPS inductor then a high frequency will be more useful (as your circuit operating frequency is likely to be high), an electrolytic capacitor would be best measured at a lower frequency (as they don't have, and you wouldn't design expecting them to have, good high-frequency performance) and a line-frequency choke would be best measured even lower.
edited 8 hours ago
Peter Mortensen
1,60031422
1,60031422
answered 19 hours ago
CursorkeysCursorkeys
26518
26518
2
$begingroup$
And the good stuff (HP 4192A and the like) often have programmable frequency over a fairly large range, there is significant value in this capability given the (sometimes very) non ideal behaviour of real parts.
$endgroup$
– Dan Mills
13 hours ago
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
And the good stuff (HP 4192A and the like) often have programmable frequency over a fairly large range, there is significant value in this capability given the (sometimes very) non ideal behaviour of real parts.
$endgroup$
– Dan Mills
13 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
And the good stuff (HP 4192A and the like) often have programmable frequency over a fairly large range, there is significant value in this capability given the (sometimes very) non ideal behaviour of real parts.
$endgroup$
– Dan Mills
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
And the good stuff (HP 4192A and the like) often have programmable frequency over a fairly large range, there is significant value in this capability given the (sometimes very) non ideal behaviour of real parts.
$endgroup$
– Dan Mills
13 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If we consider a real inductor there are several factors to take into consideration.
The windings have resistance
There is capacitance between turns
The permeability of the core is frequency dependent.
As such, trying to produce a single figure for inductance is difficult and the result will vary depending on the measurement frequency.
Similar arguments exist for why a capacitor or resistor is frequency dependent too.
Since the answer varies with frequency the manufacturer has to tell you the test frequency.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If we consider a real inductor there are several factors to take into consideration.
The windings have resistance
There is capacitance between turns
The permeability of the core is frequency dependent.
As such, trying to produce a single figure for inductance is difficult and the result will vary depending on the measurement frequency.
Similar arguments exist for why a capacitor or resistor is frequency dependent too.
Since the answer varies with frequency the manufacturer has to tell you the test frequency.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If we consider a real inductor there are several factors to take into consideration.
The windings have resistance
There is capacitance between turns
The permeability of the core is frequency dependent.
As such, trying to produce a single figure for inductance is difficult and the result will vary depending on the measurement frequency.
Similar arguments exist for why a capacitor or resistor is frequency dependent too.
Since the answer varies with frequency the manufacturer has to tell you the test frequency.
$endgroup$
If we consider a real inductor there are several factors to take into consideration.
The windings have resistance
There is capacitance between turns
The permeability of the core is frequency dependent.
As such, trying to produce a single figure for inductance is difficult and the result will vary depending on the measurement frequency.
Similar arguments exist for why a capacitor or resistor is frequency dependent too.
Since the answer varies with frequency the manufacturer has to tell you the test frequency.
edited 7 hours ago
Peter Mortensen
1,60031422
1,60031422
answered 19 hours ago
Warren HillWarren Hill
3,294926
3,294926
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It is a matter of the expected user knowledge and the intended market.
Any good DMM will specify very clearly what is the operating frequency range, the measured signal characteristics, and the DMM parasitics. Some DMMs even have 'fast displays' that operate at a different bandwidth than the slower digits, these will be clearly specified in the marketing material itself. Some markings will only be understood by the experienced user, e.g.: "True RMS".
So it is not true that DMMs don't specify these characteristics, look at the low-end general purpose Fluke 114 marketing pamphlet. It is clearly seen that it is designed for signals below 1kHz. Although they do not specify loading impedance, you can go to the user's manual to find that. (BTW: the models just above this one, 115 & 117, measure capacitance by applying a known charge and measuring voltage, these do not use a frequency sweep).
But this is a general-purpose low-cost (for a Fluke) automotive and household multimeter, it is not really intended for the electronics professional. If you look further up their extensive and expensive DMM product line you will find more detailed and specialized specifications, geared towards one market or another.
When it comes to an inductor or capacitor these are far from ideal components, their actual value will depend on many factors. Temperature, DC bias, applied signal magnitude, and yes, test frequency. Depending on the application some of these factors will be important while others will not. Test instruments are designed with these factors in mind.
That is, the instrument specifications will strongly depend on the intended market. The market for most LCR meters is not your common household as it is the case for the cheaper DMMs. You cannot really compare a $10 disposable multimeter with a $6000 professional LCR meter.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It is a matter of the expected user knowledge and the intended market.
Any good DMM will specify very clearly what is the operating frequency range, the measured signal characteristics, and the DMM parasitics. Some DMMs even have 'fast displays' that operate at a different bandwidth than the slower digits, these will be clearly specified in the marketing material itself. Some markings will only be understood by the experienced user, e.g.: "True RMS".
So it is not true that DMMs don't specify these characteristics, look at the low-end general purpose Fluke 114 marketing pamphlet. It is clearly seen that it is designed for signals below 1kHz. Although they do not specify loading impedance, you can go to the user's manual to find that. (BTW: the models just above this one, 115 & 117, measure capacitance by applying a known charge and measuring voltage, these do not use a frequency sweep).
But this is a general-purpose low-cost (for a Fluke) automotive and household multimeter, it is not really intended for the electronics professional. If you look further up their extensive and expensive DMM product line you will find more detailed and specialized specifications, geared towards one market or another.
When it comes to an inductor or capacitor these are far from ideal components, their actual value will depend on many factors. Temperature, DC bias, applied signal magnitude, and yes, test frequency. Depending on the application some of these factors will be important while others will not. Test instruments are designed with these factors in mind.
That is, the instrument specifications will strongly depend on the intended market. The market for most LCR meters is not your common household as it is the case for the cheaper DMMs. You cannot really compare a $10 disposable multimeter with a $6000 professional LCR meter.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It is a matter of the expected user knowledge and the intended market.
Any good DMM will specify very clearly what is the operating frequency range, the measured signal characteristics, and the DMM parasitics. Some DMMs even have 'fast displays' that operate at a different bandwidth than the slower digits, these will be clearly specified in the marketing material itself. Some markings will only be understood by the experienced user, e.g.: "True RMS".
So it is not true that DMMs don't specify these characteristics, look at the low-end general purpose Fluke 114 marketing pamphlet. It is clearly seen that it is designed for signals below 1kHz. Although they do not specify loading impedance, you can go to the user's manual to find that. (BTW: the models just above this one, 115 & 117, measure capacitance by applying a known charge and measuring voltage, these do not use a frequency sweep).
But this is a general-purpose low-cost (for a Fluke) automotive and household multimeter, it is not really intended for the electronics professional. If you look further up their extensive and expensive DMM product line you will find more detailed and specialized specifications, geared towards one market or another.
When it comes to an inductor or capacitor these are far from ideal components, their actual value will depend on many factors. Temperature, DC bias, applied signal magnitude, and yes, test frequency. Depending on the application some of these factors will be important while others will not. Test instruments are designed with these factors in mind.
That is, the instrument specifications will strongly depend on the intended market. The market for most LCR meters is not your common household as it is the case for the cheaper DMMs. You cannot really compare a $10 disposable multimeter with a $6000 professional LCR meter.
$endgroup$
It is a matter of the expected user knowledge and the intended market.
Any good DMM will specify very clearly what is the operating frequency range, the measured signal characteristics, and the DMM parasitics. Some DMMs even have 'fast displays' that operate at a different bandwidth than the slower digits, these will be clearly specified in the marketing material itself. Some markings will only be understood by the experienced user, e.g.: "True RMS".
So it is not true that DMMs don't specify these characteristics, look at the low-end general purpose Fluke 114 marketing pamphlet. It is clearly seen that it is designed for signals below 1kHz. Although they do not specify loading impedance, you can go to the user's manual to find that. (BTW: the models just above this one, 115 & 117, measure capacitance by applying a known charge and measuring voltage, these do not use a frequency sweep).
But this is a general-purpose low-cost (for a Fluke) automotive and household multimeter, it is not really intended for the electronics professional. If you look further up their extensive and expensive DMM product line you will find more detailed and specialized specifications, geared towards one market or another.
When it comes to an inductor or capacitor these are far from ideal components, their actual value will depend on many factors. Temperature, DC bias, applied signal magnitude, and yes, test frequency. Depending on the application some of these factors will be important while others will not. Test instruments are designed with these factors in mind.
That is, the instrument specifications will strongly depend on the intended market. The market for most LCR meters is not your common household as it is the case for the cheaper DMMs. You cannot really compare a $10 disposable multimeter with a $6000 professional LCR meter.
answered 7 hours ago
Edgar BrownEdgar Brown
3,613425
3,613425
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
When you look at manufacturer's specifications for inductance you will sometimes see odd-ball test frequencies. e.g. 7.7 MHz, 25 MHz, 2.5 MHz. These are an artifact of the old Boonton/Hewlett Packard Q-meter. In the old Q-meter you measured inductance by determining the resonance point of the test inductance with a variable capacitor. The dial on the variable capacitor was calibrated in picofarads. But in addition, the dial was calibrated in inductance (mH, uH, nH). The calibration for inductance was only good at specific frequencies. So at 2.5 MHz the dial would show 100pF as well as 40.6uH. These would be another set of inductance numbers on the dial for 7.7 MHz (4.3uH).
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
When you look at manufacturer's specifications for inductance you will sometimes see odd-ball test frequencies. e.g. 7.7 MHz, 25 MHz, 2.5 MHz. These are an artifact of the old Boonton/Hewlett Packard Q-meter. In the old Q-meter you measured inductance by determining the resonance point of the test inductance with a variable capacitor. The dial on the variable capacitor was calibrated in picofarads. But in addition, the dial was calibrated in inductance (mH, uH, nH). The calibration for inductance was only good at specific frequencies. So at 2.5 MHz the dial would show 100pF as well as 40.6uH. These would be another set of inductance numbers on the dial for 7.7 MHz (4.3uH).
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
When you look at manufacturer's specifications for inductance you will sometimes see odd-ball test frequencies. e.g. 7.7 MHz, 25 MHz, 2.5 MHz. These are an artifact of the old Boonton/Hewlett Packard Q-meter. In the old Q-meter you measured inductance by determining the resonance point of the test inductance with a variable capacitor. The dial on the variable capacitor was calibrated in picofarads. But in addition, the dial was calibrated in inductance (mH, uH, nH). The calibration for inductance was only good at specific frequencies. So at 2.5 MHz the dial would show 100pF as well as 40.6uH. These would be another set of inductance numbers on the dial for 7.7 MHz (4.3uH).
New contributor
$endgroup$
When you look at manufacturer's specifications for inductance you will sometimes see odd-ball test frequencies. e.g. 7.7 MHz, 25 MHz, 2.5 MHz. These are an artifact of the old Boonton/Hewlett Packard Q-meter. In the old Q-meter you measured inductance by determining the resonance point of the test inductance with a variable capacitor. The dial on the variable capacitor was calibrated in picofarads. But in addition, the dial was calibrated in inductance (mH, uH, nH). The calibration for inductance was only good at specific frequencies. So at 2.5 MHz the dial would show 100pF as well as 40.6uH. These would be another set of inductance numbers on the dial for 7.7 MHz (4.3uH).
New contributor
New contributor
answered 3 hours ago
Tom MillerTom Miller
1
1
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f417067%2fwhy-do-lcr-meter-manufacturers-give-the-details-of-measurement-frequency-to-us%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown