Python set variables to shorter list and list length












0












$begingroup$


I have a simple task that I can't find an elegant solution to. Say I have two arrays and I want to find which one is shorter and create variables for both their lengths (specifying them as long and short). Here's an inelegant way to do it:



l1 = len(arr1)
l2 = len(arr2)

if l1 < l2:
short_arr = arr1
long_arr = arr2
lshort = l1
llong = l2
else:
short_arr = arr2
long_arr = arr1
lshort = l2
llong = l1


What's a better way to do it?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    I have a simple task that I can't find an elegant solution to. Say I have two arrays and I want to find which one is shorter and create variables for both their lengths (specifying them as long and short). Here's an inelegant way to do it:



    l1 = len(arr1)
    l2 = len(arr2)

    if l1 < l2:
    short_arr = arr1
    long_arr = arr2
    lshort = l1
    llong = l2
    else:
    short_arr = arr2
    long_arr = arr1
    lshort = l2
    llong = l1


    What's a better way to do it?










    share|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      I have a simple task that I can't find an elegant solution to. Say I have two arrays and I want to find which one is shorter and create variables for both their lengths (specifying them as long and short). Here's an inelegant way to do it:



      l1 = len(arr1)
      l2 = len(arr2)

      if l1 < l2:
      short_arr = arr1
      long_arr = arr2
      lshort = l1
      llong = l2
      else:
      short_arr = arr2
      long_arr = arr1
      lshort = l2
      llong = l1


      What's a better way to do it?










      share|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I have a simple task that I can't find an elegant solution to. Say I have two arrays and I want to find which one is shorter and create variables for both their lengths (specifying them as long and short). Here's an inelegant way to do it:



      l1 = len(arr1)
      l2 = len(arr2)

      if l1 < l2:
      short_arr = arr1
      long_arr = arr2
      lshort = l1
      llong = l2
      else:
      short_arr = arr2
      long_arr = arr1
      lshort = l2
      llong = l1


      What's a better way to do it?







      python






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 34 mins ago









      jss367jss367

      18629




      18629






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          I can’t claim this is more elegant, but it is shorter:



          short_arr, long_arr = (arr1, arr2) if len(arr1) < len(arr2) else (arr2, arr1)
          lshort, llong = len(short_arr), len(long_arr)


          And the absolutely wrong way to do it would be:



          ((lshort, short_arr), (llong, long_arr)) = sorted([(len(arr1), arr1), (len(arr2), arr2)])





          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
            StackExchange.snippets.init();
            });
            });
            }, "code-snippets");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "196"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f212501%2fpython-set-variables-to-shorter-list-and-list-length%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0












            $begingroup$

            I can’t claim this is more elegant, but it is shorter:



            short_arr, long_arr = (arr1, arr2) if len(arr1) < len(arr2) else (arr2, arr1)
            lshort, llong = len(short_arr), len(long_arr)


            And the absolutely wrong way to do it would be:



            ((lshort, short_arr), (llong, long_arr)) = sorted([(len(arr1), arr1), (len(arr2), arr2)])





            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$


















              0












              $begingroup$

              I can’t claim this is more elegant, but it is shorter:



              short_arr, long_arr = (arr1, arr2) if len(arr1) < len(arr2) else (arr2, arr1)
              lshort, llong = len(short_arr), len(long_arr)


              And the absolutely wrong way to do it would be:



              ((lshort, short_arr), (llong, long_arr)) = sorted([(len(arr1), arr1), (len(arr2), arr2)])





              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$
















                0












                0








                0





                $begingroup$

                I can’t claim this is more elegant, but it is shorter:



                short_arr, long_arr = (arr1, arr2) if len(arr1) < len(arr2) else (arr2, arr1)
                lshort, llong = len(short_arr), len(long_arr)


                And the absolutely wrong way to do it would be:



                ((lshort, short_arr), (llong, long_arr)) = sorted([(len(arr1), arr1), (len(arr2), arr2)])





                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                I can’t claim this is more elegant, but it is shorter:



                short_arr, long_arr = (arr1, arr2) if len(arr1) < len(arr2) else (arr2, arr1)
                lshort, llong = len(short_arr), len(long_arr)


                And the absolutely wrong way to do it would be:



                ((lshort, short_arr), (llong, long_arr)) = sorted([(len(arr1), arr1), (len(arr2), arr2)])






                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited 11 mins ago

























                answered 21 mins ago









                AJNeufeldAJNeufeld

                4,727318




                4,727318






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f212501%2fpython-set-variables-to-shorter-list-and-list-length%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Сан-Квентин

                    Алькесар

                    Josef Freinademetz