Modelling snowfall as a random walk with a drift
I am trying to simulate a (very) simple model of snow fall/accumulation using random walks in the following way:
sf =
Accumulate[RandomVariate[BernoulliDistribution[0.2], 100] *
RandomVariate[GammaDistribution[1, 2], 100] /. {0. -> -0.4}]
ListLinePlot[sf]
I generate Bernoulli trials with a success of probability of 0.2 to simulate days that it snows. On a day that it doesn't snow instead of a simple 0 entry I am introducing a negative drift term of -0.4 to emulate the melting of the snow.
Where I am having trouble is that you can't ever have negative snowfall. I want the walker to always remain bigger than or equal to 0. However, I can't just send all negative entries to 0 as that would eliminate the data of days where it snows but the drift term is larger than the snowfall.
Thanks.
probability-or-statistics random-process
add a comment |
I am trying to simulate a (very) simple model of snow fall/accumulation using random walks in the following way:
sf =
Accumulate[RandomVariate[BernoulliDistribution[0.2], 100] *
RandomVariate[GammaDistribution[1, 2], 100] /. {0. -> -0.4}]
ListLinePlot[sf]
I generate Bernoulli trials with a success of probability of 0.2 to simulate days that it snows. On a day that it doesn't snow instead of a simple 0 entry I am introducing a negative drift term of -0.4 to emulate the melting of the snow.
Where I am having trouble is that you can't ever have negative snowfall. I want the walker to always remain bigger than or equal to 0. However, I can't just send all negative entries to 0 as that would eliminate the data of days where it snows but the drift term is larger than the snowfall.
Thanks.
probability-or-statistics random-process
add a comment |
I am trying to simulate a (very) simple model of snow fall/accumulation using random walks in the following way:
sf =
Accumulate[RandomVariate[BernoulliDistribution[0.2], 100] *
RandomVariate[GammaDistribution[1, 2], 100] /. {0. -> -0.4}]
ListLinePlot[sf]
I generate Bernoulli trials with a success of probability of 0.2 to simulate days that it snows. On a day that it doesn't snow instead of a simple 0 entry I am introducing a negative drift term of -0.4 to emulate the melting of the snow.
Where I am having trouble is that you can't ever have negative snowfall. I want the walker to always remain bigger than or equal to 0. However, I can't just send all negative entries to 0 as that would eliminate the data of days where it snows but the drift term is larger than the snowfall.
Thanks.
probability-or-statistics random-process
I am trying to simulate a (very) simple model of snow fall/accumulation using random walks in the following way:
sf =
Accumulate[RandomVariate[BernoulliDistribution[0.2], 100] *
RandomVariate[GammaDistribution[1, 2], 100] /. {0. -> -0.4}]
ListLinePlot[sf]
I generate Bernoulli trials with a success of probability of 0.2 to simulate days that it snows. On a day that it doesn't snow instead of a simple 0 entry I am introducing a negative drift term of -0.4 to emulate the melting of the snow.
Where I am having trouble is that you can't ever have negative snowfall. I want the walker to always remain bigger than or equal to 0. However, I can't just send all negative entries to 0 as that would eliminate the data of days where it snows but the drift term is larger than the snowfall.
Thanks.
probability-or-statistics random-process
probability-or-statistics random-process
edited Dec 31 '18 at 4:56
m_goldberg
84.3k872195
84.3k872195
asked Dec 31 '18 at 2:21
Will
734
734
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
I don't think Accumulate
is powerful enough. Rather, you should use FoldList
.
SeedRandom[2];
sf =
FoldList[If[#2 == 0, Max[#1 - .4, 0], #1 + #2] &,
RandomVariate[BernoulliDistribution[0.2], 100] *
RandomVariate[GammaDistribution[1, 2], 100]];
ListLinePlot[sf]
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "387"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f188629%2fmodelling-snowfall-as-a-random-walk-with-a-drift%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I don't think Accumulate
is powerful enough. Rather, you should use FoldList
.
SeedRandom[2];
sf =
FoldList[If[#2 == 0, Max[#1 - .4, 0], #1 + #2] &,
RandomVariate[BernoulliDistribution[0.2], 100] *
RandomVariate[GammaDistribution[1, 2], 100]];
ListLinePlot[sf]
add a comment |
I don't think Accumulate
is powerful enough. Rather, you should use FoldList
.
SeedRandom[2];
sf =
FoldList[If[#2 == 0, Max[#1 - .4, 0], #1 + #2] &,
RandomVariate[BernoulliDistribution[0.2], 100] *
RandomVariate[GammaDistribution[1, 2], 100]];
ListLinePlot[sf]
add a comment |
I don't think Accumulate
is powerful enough. Rather, you should use FoldList
.
SeedRandom[2];
sf =
FoldList[If[#2 == 0, Max[#1 - .4, 0], #1 + #2] &,
RandomVariate[BernoulliDistribution[0.2], 100] *
RandomVariate[GammaDistribution[1, 2], 100]];
ListLinePlot[sf]
I don't think Accumulate
is powerful enough. Rather, you should use FoldList
.
SeedRandom[2];
sf =
FoldList[If[#2 == 0, Max[#1 - .4, 0], #1 + #2] &,
RandomVariate[BernoulliDistribution[0.2], 100] *
RandomVariate[GammaDistribution[1, 2], 100]];
ListLinePlot[sf]
answered Dec 31 '18 at 5:18
m_goldberg
84.3k872195
84.3k872195
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f188629%2fmodelling-snowfall-as-a-random-walk-with-a-drift%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown