Functors in arrow category
I am studying Awodey's Category theory book. I have trouble understanding the following line:
Observe that there are two functors in arrow category i.e.
$$
begin{align}
mathscr{C} xleftarrow{textbf{dom}} mathscr{C}^{rightarrow} xrightarrow{textbf{cod}} mathscr{C}
end{align}
$$
where $mathscr{C}^{rightarrow}$ is the arrow category corresponding to $mathscr{C}$.
They have not mentioned what these $textbf{dom}$ and $textbf{cod}$ are? How do we prove that these are functors?
My understanding:
Now, in the diagram given below:
$textbf{dom}:mathscr{C}^{rightarrow} xrightarrow{textbf{dom}} mathscr{C}$. So,
$[f:A to B] mapsto A $ (object mapping of functor $textbf{dom}$) and
if $g=(g_1,g_2):[f:A to B] to [f':A' to B'] $, then $(g_1,g_2) mapsto [f:A to B]$ (the morphism mapping of functor $textbf{dom}$ ).
Using this definition, If I proceed to prove the statement:
(a)
$$
textbf{dom} ( g:f to f' ) = textbf{dom}(g): textbf{dom}(f) to textbf{dom}(f')
$$
LHS = $f:A to B$ and RHS = $textbf{dom}(g): A to A'$ (which seems absurd)
I am not sure if this makes sense.
category-theory
add a comment |
I am studying Awodey's Category theory book. I have trouble understanding the following line:
Observe that there are two functors in arrow category i.e.
$$
begin{align}
mathscr{C} xleftarrow{textbf{dom}} mathscr{C}^{rightarrow} xrightarrow{textbf{cod}} mathscr{C}
end{align}
$$
where $mathscr{C}^{rightarrow}$ is the arrow category corresponding to $mathscr{C}$.
They have not mentioned what these $textbf{dom}$ and $textbf{cod}$ are? How do we prove that these are functors?
My understanding:
Now, in the diagram given below:
$textbf{dom}:mathscr{C}^{rightarrow} xrightarrow{textbf{dom}} mathscr{C}$. So,
$[f:A to B] mapsto A $ (object mapping of functor $textbf{dom}$) and
if $g=(g_1,g_2):[f:A to B] to [f':A' to B'] $, then $(g_1,g_2) mapsto [f:A to B]$ (the morphism mapping of functor $textbf{dom}$ ).
Using this definition, If I proceed to prove the statement:
(a)
$$
textbf{dom} ( g:f to f' ) = textbf{dom}(g): textbf{dom}(f) to textbf{dom}(f')
$$
LHS = $f:A to B$ and RHS = $textbf{dom}(g): A to A'$ (which seems absurd)
I am not sure if this makes sense.
category-theory
domain and codomain. Maps the arrow $f:Ato A'$ to $A$ and to $A'$ respectively.
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Dec 31 '18 at 8:26
@LordSharktheUnknown I am not able to prove even, first condition of functor i.e. $textbf{dom} ( g:f to f' ) = textbf{dom}(g): textbf{dom}(f) to textbf{dom}(f')$
– MUH
Dec 31 '18 at 8:39
add a comment |
I am studying Awodey's Category theory book. I have trouble understanding the following line:
Observe that there are two functors in arrow category i.e.
$$
begin{align}
mathscr{C} xleftarrow{textbf{dom}} mathscr{C}^{rightarrow} xrightarrow{textbf{cod}} mathscr{C}
end{align}
$$
where $mathscr{C}^{rightarrow}$ is the arrow category corresponding to $mathscr{C}$.
They have not mentioned what these $textbf{dom}$ and $textbf{cod}$ are? How do we prove that these are functors?
My understanding:
Now, in the diagram given below:
$textbf{dom}:mathscr{C}^{rightarrow} xrightarrow{textbf{dom}} mathscr{C}$. So,
$[f:A to B] mapsto A $ (object mapping of functor $textbf{dom}$) and
if $g=(g_1,g_2):[f:A to B] to [f':A' to B'] $, then $(g_1,g_2) mapsto [f:A to B]$ (the morphism mapping of functor $textbf{dom}$ ).
Using this definition, If I proceed to prove the statement:
(a)
$$
textbf{dom} ( g:f to f' ) = textbf{dom}(g): textbf{dom}(f) to textbf{dom}(f')
$$
LHS = $f:A to B$ and RHS = $textbf{dom}(g): A to A'$ (which seems absurd)
I am not sure if this makes sense.
category-theory
I am studying Awodey's Category theory book. I have trouble understanding the following line:
Observe that there are two functors in arrow category i.e.
$$
begin{align}
mathscr{C} xleftarrow{textbf{dom}} mathscr{C}^{rightarrow} xrightarrow{textbf{cod}} mathscr{C}
end{align}
$$
where $mathscr{C}^{rightarrow}$ is the arrow category corresponding to $mathscr{C}$.
They have not mentioned what these $textbf{dom}$ and $textbf{cod}$ are? How do we prove that these are functors?
My understanding:
Now, in the diagram given below:
$textbf{dom}:mathscr{C}^{rightarrow} xrightarrow{textbf{dom}} mathscr{C}$. So,
$[f:A to B] mapsto A $ (object mapping of functor $textbf{dom}$) and
if $g=(g_1,g_2):[f:A to B] to [f':A' to B'] $, then $(g_1,g_2) mapsto [f:A to B]$ (the morphism mapping of functor $textbf{dom}$ ).
Using this definition, If I proceed to prove the statement:
(a)
$$
textbf{dom} ( g:f to f' ) = textbf{dom}(g): textbf{dom}(f) to textbf{dom}(f')
$$
LHS = $f:A to B$ and RHS = $textbf{dom}(g): A to A'$ (which seems absurd)
I am not sure if this makes sense.
category-theory
category-theory
edited Dec 31 '18 at 8:34
asked Dec 31 '18 at 8:24
MUH
395216
395216
domain and codomain. Maps the arrow $f:Ato A'$ to $A$ and to $A'$ respectively.
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Dec 31 '18 at 8:26
@LordSharktheUnknown I am not able to prove even, first condition of functor i.e. $textbf{dom} ( g:f to f' ) = textbf{dom}(g): textbf{dom}(f) to textbf{dom}(f')$
– MUH
Dec 31 '18 at 8:39
add a comment |
domain and codomain. Maps the arrow $f:Ato A'$ to $A$ and to $A'$ respectively.
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Dec 31 '18 at 8:26
@LordSharktheUnknown I am not able to prove even, first condition of functor i.e. $textbf{dom} ( g:f to f' ) = textbf{dom}(g): textbf{dom}(f) to textbf{dom}(f')$
– MUH
Dec 31 '18 at 8:39
domain and codomain. Maps the arrow $f:Ato A'$ to $A$ and to $A'$ respectively.
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Dec 31 '18 at 8:26
domain and codomain. Maps the arrow $f:Ato A'$ to $A$ and to $A'$ respectively.
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Dec 31 '18 at 8:26
@LordSharktheUnknown I am not able to prove even, first condition of functor i.e. $textbf{dom} ( g:f to f' ) = textbf{dom}(g): textbf{dom}(f) to textbf{dom}(f')$
– MUH
Dec 31 '18 at 8:39
@LordSharktheUnknown I am not able to prove even, first condition of functor i.e. $textbf{dom} ( g:f to f' ) = textbf{dom}(g): textbf{dom}(f) to textbf{dom}(f')$
– MUH
Dec 31 '18 at 8:39
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Writing: $$fstackrel{(g_1,g_2)}{to}f'tag1$$ where $f,f'$ are objects of arrow category $mathcal C^{to}$ and pair $(g_1,g_2)$ is an element of homset $mathcal C^{to}(f,f')$ represents a commuting diagram pictured in your question.
We have the functor $mathbf{dom}:mathcal C^{to}tomathcal C$ prescribed by:$$[fstackrel{(g_1,g_2)}{to}f']mapsto[mathsf{dom}fstackrel{g_1}{to}mathsf{dom}f']$$
And we have the functor $mathbf{cod}:mathcal C^{to}tomathcal C$ prescribed by:$$[fstackrel{(g_1,g_2)}{to}f']mapsto[mathsf{cod}fstackrel{g_2}{to}mathsf{cod}f']$$
In order to prove that $mathbf{dom}$ and $mathbf{cod}$ are functors it must be shown both of them respect identities and composition.
If $(1)$ stands for an identity then $f=f'$ and $g_1,g_2$ are both identities in $mathcal C$. This guarantees that identities are respected.
By composition we must expand $(1)$ to: $$fstackrel{(g_1,g_2)}{to}f'text{ and }f'stackrel{(g'_1,g'_2)}{to}f''tag2$$with commuting squares.
Then we have: $$(g'_1,g'_2)circ(g_1,g_2)=(g'_1circ g_1,g'_2circ g_2)$$assuring that composition is respected.
add a comment |
The functor $mathbf{dom}$ takes the object $f$ to $A,$ the object $f'$ to $A';$ and takes the arrow $(g_1,g_2):fto f'$ to $g_1.$ Notice $g_1$ is an arrow $Ato A'$ as it should be.
The identity morphism $mathrm{id}_f$ is simply $(mathrm{id}_A, mathrm{id}_{A'}),$ so $mathbf{dom}(mathrm{id}_f) = mathrm{id}_A$ as required.
The composition of two morphisms $(g_1,g_2)circ (h_1,h_2)$ is $(g_1circ h_1, g_2circ h_2),$ as can be seen by drawing two commuting squares side by side. So $mathbf{dom}((g_1,g_2)circ (h_1,h_2)) = g_1circ h_1 = mathbf{dom}((g_1,g_2))circmathbf{dom}((h_1circ h_2))$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3057510%2ffunctors-in-arrow-category%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Writing: $$fstackrel{(g_1,g_2)}{to}f'tag1$$ where $f,f'$ are objects of arrow category $mathcal C^{to}$ and pair $(g_1,g_2)$ is an element of homset $mathcal C^{to}(f,f')$ represents a commuting diagram pictured in your question.
We have the functor $mathbf{dom}:mathcal C^{to}tomathcal C$ prescribed by:$$[fstackrel{(g_1,g_2)}{to}f']mapsto[mathsf{dom}fstackrel{g_1}{to}mathsf{dom}f']$$
And we have the functor $mathbf{cod}:mathcal C^{to}tomathcal C$ prescribed by:$$[fstackrel{(g_1,g_2)}{to}f']mapsto[mathsf{cod}fstackrel{g_2}{to}mathsf{cod}f']$$
In order to prove that $mathbf{dom}$ and $mathbf{cod}$ are functors it must be shown both of them respect identities and composition.
If $(1)$ stands for an identity then $f=f'$ and $g_1,g_2$ are both identities in $mathcal C$. This guarantees that identities are respected.
By composition we must expand $(1)$ to: $$fstackrel{(g_1,g_2)}{to}f'text{ and }f'stackrel{(g'_1,g'_2)}{to}f''tag2$$with commuting squares.
Then we have: $$(g'_1,g'_2)circ(g_1,g_2)=(g'_1circ g_1,g'_2circ g_2)$$assuring that composition is respected.
add a comment |
Writing: $$fstackrel{(g_1,g_2)}{to}f'tag1$$ where $f,f'$ are objects of arrow category $mathcal C^{to}$ and pair $(g_1,g_2)$ is an element of homset $mathcal C^{to}(f,f')$ represents a commuting diagram pictured in your question.
We have the functor $mathbf{dom}:mathcal C^{to}tomathcal C$ prescribed by:$$[fstackrel{(g_1,g_2)}{to}f']mapsto[mathsf{dom}fstackrel{g_1}{to}mathsf{dom}f']$$
And we have the functor $mathbf{cod}:mathcal C^{to}tomathcal C$ prescribed by:$$[fstackrel{(g_1,g_2)}{to}f']mapsto[mathsf{cod}fstackrel{g_2}{to}mathsf{cod}f']$$
In order to prove that $mathbf{dom}$ and $mathbf{cod}$ are functors it must be shown both of them respect identities and composition.
If $(1)$ stands for an identity then $f=f'$ and $g_1,g_2$ are both identities in $mathcal C$. This guarantees that identities are respected.
By composition we must expand $(1)$ to: $$fstackrel{(g_1,g_2)}{to}f'text{ and }f'stackrel{(g'_1,g'_2)}{to}f''tag2$$with commuting squares.
Then we have: $$(g'_1,g'_2)circ(g_1,g_2)=(g'_1circ g_1,g'_2circ g_2)$$assuring that composition is respected.
add a comment |
Writing: $$fstackrel{(g_1,g_2)}{to}f'tag1$$ where $f,f'$ are objects of arrow category $mathcal C^{to}$ and pair $(g_1,g_2)$ is an element of homset $mathcal C^{to}(f,f')$ represents a commuting diagram pictured in your question.
We have the functor $mathbf{dom}:mathcal C^{to}tomathcal C$ prescribed by:$$[fstackrel{(g_1,g_2)}{to}f']mapsto[mathsf{dom}fstackrel{g_1}{to}mathsf{dom}f']$$
And we have the functor $mathbf{cod}:mathcal C^{to}tomathcal C$ prescribed by:$$[fstackrel{(g_1,g_2)}{to}f']mapsto[mathsf{cod}fstackrel{g_2}{to}mathsf{cod}f']$$
In order to prove that $mathbf{dom}$ and $mathbf{cod}$ are functors it must be shown both of them respect identities and composition.
If $(1)$ stands for an identity then $f=f'$ and $g_1,g_2$ are both identities in $mathcal C$. This guarantees that identities are respected.
By composition we must expand $(1)$ to: $$fstackrel{(g_1,g_2)}{to}f'text{ and }f'stackrel{(g'_1,g'_2)}{to}f''tag2$$with commuting squares.
Then we have: $$(g'_1,g'_2)circ(g_1,g_2)=(g'_1circ g_1,g'_2circ g_2)$$assuring that composition is respected.
Writing: $$fstackrel{(g_1,g_2)}{to}f'tag1$$ where $f,f'$ are objects of arrow category $mathcal C^{to}$ and pair $(g_1,g_2)$ is an element of homset $mathcal C^{to}(f,f')$ represents a commuting diagram pictured in your question.
We have the functor $mathbf{dom}:mathcal C^{to}tomathcal C$ prescribed by:$$[fstackrel{(g_1,g_2)}{to}f']mapsto[mathsf{dom}fstackrel{g_1}{to}mathsf{dom}f']$$
And we have the functor $mathbf{cod}:mathcal C^{to}tomathcal C$ prescribed by:$$[fstackrel{(g_1,g_2)}{to}f']mapsto[mathsf{cod}fstackrel{g_2}{to}mathsf{cod}f']$$
In order to prove that $mathbf{dom}$ and $mathbf{cod}$ are functors it must be shown both of them respect identities and composition.
If $(1)$ stands for an identity then $f=f'$ and $g_1,g_2$ are both identities in $mathcal C$. This guarantees that identities are respected.
By composition we must expand $(1)$ to: $$fstackrel{(g_1,g_2)}{to}f'text{ and }f'stackrel{(g'_1,g'_2)}{to}f''tag2$$with commuting squares.
Then we have: $$(g'_1,g'_2)circ(g_1,g_2)=(g'_1circ g_1,g'_2circ g_2)$$assuring that composition is respected.
answered Dec 31 '18 at 8:53
drhab
98k544129
98k544129
add a comment |
add a comment |
The functor $mathbf{dom}$ takes the object $f$ to $A,$ the object $f'$ to $A';$ and takes the arrow $(g_1,g_2):fto f'$ to $g_1.$ Notice $g_1$ is an arrow $Ato A'$ as it should be.
The identity morphism $mathrm{id}_f$ is simply $(mathrm{id}_A, mathrm{id}_{A'}),$ so $mathbf{dom}(mathrm{id}_f) = mathrm{id}_A$ as required.
The composition of two morphisms $(g_1,g_2)circ (h_1,h_2)$ is $(g_1circ h_1, g_2circ h_2),$ as can be seen by drawing two commuting squares side by side. So $mathbf{dom}((g_1,g_2)circ (h_1,h_2)) = g_1circ h_1 = mathbf{dom}((g_1,g_2))circmathbf{dom}((h_1circ h_2))$
add a comment |
The functor $mathbf{dom}$ takes the object $f$ to $A,$ the object $f'$ to $A';$ and takes the arrow $(g_1,g_2):fto f'$ to $g_1.$ Notice $g_1$ is an arrow $Ato A'$ as it should be.
The identity morphism $mathrm{id}_f$ is simply $(mathrm{id}_A, mathrm{id}_{A'}),$ so $mathbf{dom}(mathrm{id}_f) = mathrm{id}_A$ as required.
The composition of two morphisms $(g_1,g_2)circ (h_1,h_2)$ is $(g_1circ h_1, g_2circ h_2),$ as can be seen by drawing two commuting squares side by side. So $mathbf{dom}((g_1,g_2)circ (h_1,h_2)) = g_1circ h_1 = mathbf{dom}((g_1,g_2))circmathbf{dom}((h_1circ h_2))$
add a comment |
The functor $mathbf{dom}$ takes the object $f$ to $A,$ the object $f'$ to $A';$ and takes the arrow $(g_1,g_2):fto f'$ to $g_1.$ Notice $g_1$ is an arrow $Ato A'$ as it should be.
The identity morphism $mathrm{id}_f$ is simply $(mathrm{id}_A, mathrm{id}_{A'}),$ so $mathbf{dom}(mathrm{id}_f) = mathrm{id}_A$ as required.
The composition of two morphisms $(g_1,g_2)circ (h_1,h_2)$ is $(g_1circ h_1, g_2circ h_2),$ as can be seen by drawing two commuting squares side by side. So $mathbf{dom}((g_1,g_2)circ (h_1,h_2)) = g_1circ h_1 = mathbf{dom}((g_1,g_2))circmathbf{dom}((h_1circ h_2))$
The functor $mathbf{dom}$ takes the object $f$ to $A,$ the object $f'$ to $A';$ and takes the arrow $(g_1,g_2):fto f'$ to $g_1.$ Notice $g_1$ is an arrow $Ato A'$ as it should be.
The identity morphism $mathrm{id}_f$ is simply $(mathrm{id}_A, mathrm{id}_{A'}),$ so $mathbf{dom}(mathrm{id}_f) = mathrm{id}_A$ as required.
The composition of two morphisms $(g_1,g_2)circ (h_1,h_2)$ is $(g_1circ h_1, g_2circ h_2),$ as can be seen by drawing two commuting squares side by side. So $mathbf{dom}((g_1,g_2)circ (h_1,h_2)) = g_1circ h_1 = mathbf{dom}((g_1,g_2))circmathbf{dom}((h_1circ h_2))$
answered Dec 31 '18 at 8:57
spaceisdarkgreen
32.4k21753
32.4k21753
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3057510%2ffunctors-in-arrow-category%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
domain and codomain. Maps the arrow $f:Ato A'$ to $A$ and to $A'$ respectively.
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Dec 31 '18 at 8:26
@LordSharktheUnknown I am not able to prove even, first condition of functor i.e. $textbf{dom} ( g:f to f' ) = textbf{dom}(g): textbf{dom}(f) to textbf{dom}(f')$
– MUH
Dec 31 '18 at 8:39