WinXP dir command: 3 and 4 char extensions are the same?
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
I'm trying to recursively search a directory tree to find all of the .asp
files using the following command:
dir *.asp /s
For some reason, this returns not only the asp files, but also the aspx files.
How can I force it to ignore the aspx files?
windows-xp command-line dir
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
I'm trying to recursively search a directory tree to find all of the .asp
files using the following command:
dir *.asp /s
For some reason, this returns not only the asp files, but also the aspx files.
How can I force it to ignore the aspx files?
windows-xp command-line dir
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
I'm trying to recursively search a directory tree to find all of the .asp
files using the following command:
dir *.asp /s
For some reason, this returns not only the asp files, but also the aspx files.
How can I force it to ignore the aspx files?
windows-xp command-line dir
I'm trying to recursively search a directory tree to find all of the .asp
files using the following command:
dir *.asp /s
For some reason, this returns not only the asp files, but also the aspx files.
How can I force it to ignore the aspx files?
windows-xp command-line dir
windows-xp command-line dir
edited Mar 29 '17 at 1:48
phuclv
8,88063788
8,88063788
asked Jan 28 '11 at 12:58
chris
4,932176079
4,932176079
add a comment |
add a comment |
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
up vote
5
down vote
accepted
dir /x
For compatibility reasons, Windows generates a 8.3 name for every long file name created, and wildcard matching code (FindFirstFile()
) checks both the original and shortened names. Use dir /x
to see what short names are assigned to each file.
The "extension" part of a 8.3 name is always created by simply truncating the last extension to at most 3 characters: .aspx
to .ASP
When using the NTFS filesystem, 8.3 name creation can be disabled system-wide using:
fsutil behavior set disable8dot3
However, this won't affect existing names. You will have to rename each file and then rename it back to its original name.
See also: Directory search in Windows Command Prompt shows incorrect output!
Well, that's a pretty good explanation of why - but it seems like there isn't a way to then force the dir command to ignore the aspx files?
– chris
Jan 28 '11 at 14:17
1
@chris: No. But you can either remove the 8.3 names from your system (will likely save you a lot of trouble later), or filter thedir
output withdir /b/s *.asp | findstr /ile .asp
-- this discards lines that do not end with.asp
.
– grawity
Jan 28 '11 at 14:19
according to this answer you can usefsutil 8dot3name strip directory
to remove the existing names, no need to rename them
– phuclv
Apr 22 '17 at 16:18
Why does FindFirstFile find short names?
– phuclv
Jun 12 '17 at 2:34
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Of course this varies according to what command interpreter's DIR
command one uses. The DIR
command in Take Command, for example, only matches long names by default and so doesn't exhibit this behaviour. (Matching of short as well as long names can be turned on for compatibility with CMD's DIR
command.) So there are ways to address this that don't require FSUTIL
and administrator privileges.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Interesting - seems to be a bug...
Considering, I would pipe it through find like so:
dir /s *.asp | find /i /v ".aspx "
it's not a bug, as per grawity's answer. But why do you leave a space at the end of aspx?
– phuclv
Mar 29 '17 at 1:49
1
@phuclv, the trailing space must be removed, because it becaome part of the search string otherwise; anyway, this approach would also exclude files that have.aspx
somewhere in the middle of their names, likefile.aspx.name.asp
, which should actually be included...
– aschipfl
Nov 28 at 13:07
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
If you have PowerShell, you can use:
dir *.asp -r | remove-item
If you don't have PowerShell, why not?
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
As user grawity anready said in their answer, it is because the wildcards used by cmd
's internal commands and several external ones also match against 8.3 file names, which are enabled by default.
To work around that, there are several ways, some of which I want to show you:
You can use findstr
to filter the file names returned by dir
:
dir /S /B /A:-D "*.asp" | findstr /IEC:".asp"
This does not even match files that have .asp
somewhere in their names (like file.asp.aspx
), nor does it exclude files that have .aspx
in their names (like file.aspx.asp
).
The switch /B
lets dir
return a pure list of file names/paths, which can be filtered properly. The option /A:-D
excludes any matching directories.
Alternatively, the where
command could be used, which handles wildcards differently than dir
:
where /R "." "*.asp"
The disadvantage is that this command also regards the content of the PATHEXT
variable, so this would also match a file that end in .asp.exe
, given that .EXE
is contained in PATHEXT
; to avoid that, you could temporarily clear the PATHEXT
variable (by set "PATHEXT_BACKUP=%PATHEXT%" & set "PATHEXT="
) and restore it later (by set "PATHEXT=%PATHEXT_BACKUP%" & set "PATHEXT_BACKUP="
).
This answer by user Konrad shows a way to change the default behaviour of creating 8.3 file names of items with an extension with more than 3 characters, which in turn prevents most of such unintended matches. But unfortunately this does not change any current 8.3 file names. And of course there could theoretically be situations where the 8.3 file names are still matching although quite unlikely.
I have to admit that I did not yet test this...
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "3"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f238900%2fwinxp-dir-command-3-and-4-char-extensions-are-the-same%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
5
down vote
accepted
dir /x
For compatibility reasons, Windows generates a 8.3 name for every long file name created, and wildcard matching code (FindFirstFile()
) checks both the original and shortened names. Use dir /x
to see what short names are assigned to each file.
The "extension" part of a 8.3 name is always created by simply truncating the last extension to at most 3 characters: .aspx
to .ASP
When using the NTFS filesystem, 8.3 name creation can be disabled system-wide using:
fsutil behavior set disable8dot3
However, this won't affect existing names. You will have to rename each file and then rename it back to its original name.
See also: Directory search in Windows Command Prompt shows incorrect output!
Well, that's a pretty good explanation of why - but it seems like there isn't a way to then force the dir command to ignore the aspx files?
– chris
Jan 28 '11 at 14:17
1
@chris: No. But you can either remove the 8.3 names from your system (will likely save you a lot of trouble later), or filter thedir
output withdir /b/s *.asp | findstr /ile .asp
-- this discards lines that do not end with.asp
.
– grawity
Jan 28 '11 at 14:19
according to this answer you can usefsutil 8dot3name strip directory
to remove the existing names, no need to rename them
– phuclv
Apr 22 '17 at 16:18
Why does FindFirstFile find short names?
– phuclv
Jun 12 '17 at 2:34
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
accepted
dir /x
For compatibility reasons, Windows generates a 8.3 name for every long file name created, and wildcard matching code (FindFirstFile()
) checks both the original and shortened names. Use dir /x
to see what short names are assigned to each file.
The "extension" part of a 8.3 name is always created by simply truncating the last extension to at most 3 characters: .aspx
to .ASP
When using the NTFS filesystem, 8.3 name creation can be disabled system-wide using:
fsutil behavior set disable8dot3
However, this won't affect existing names. You will have to rename each file and then rename it back to its original name.
See also: Directory search in Windows Command Prompt shows incorrect output!
Well, that's a pretty good explanation of why - but it seems like there isn't a way to then force the dir command to ignore the aspx files?
– chris
Jan 28 '11 at 14:17
1
@chris: No. But you can either remove the 8.3 names from your system (will likely save you a lot of trouble later), or filter thedir
output withdir /b/s *.asp | findstr /ile .asp
-- this discards lines that do not end with.asp
.
– grawity
Jan 28 '11 at 14:19
according to this answer you can usefsutil 8dot3name strip directory
to remove the existing names, no need to rename them
– phuclv
Apr 22 '17 at 16:18
Why does FindFirstFile find short names?
– phuclv
Jun 12 '17 at 2:34
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
accepted
up vote
5
down vote
accepted
dir /x
For compatibility reasons, Windows generates a 8.3 name for every long file name created, and wildcard matching code (FindFirstFile()
) checks both the original and shortened names. Use dir /x
to see what short names are assigned to each file.
The "extension" part of a 8.3 name is always created by simply truncating the last extension to at most 3 characters: .aspx
to .ASP
When using the NTFS filesystem, 8.3 name creation can be disabled system-wide using:
fsutil behavior set disable8dot3
However, this won't affect existing names. You will have to rename each file and then rename it back to its original name.
See also: Directory search in Windows Command Prompt shows incorrect output!
dir /x
For compatibility reasons, Windows generates a 8.3 name for every long file name created, and wildcard matching code (FindFirstFile()
) checks both the original and shortened names. Use dir /x
to see what short names are assigned to each file.
The "extension" part of a 8.3 name is always created by simply truncating the last extension to at most 3 characters: .aspx
to .ASP
When using the NTFS filesystem, 8.3 name creation can be disabled system-wide using:
fsutil behavior set disable8dot3
However, this won't affect existing names. You will have to rename each file and then rename it back to its original name.
See also: Directory search in Windows Command Prompt shows incorrect output!
edited Mar 20 '17 at 10:16
Community♦
1
1
answered Jan 28 '11 at 13:52
grawity
231k35486544
231k35486544
Well, that's a pretty good explanation of why - but it seems like there isn't a way to then force the dir command to ignore the aspx files?
– chris
Jan 28 '11 at 14:17
1
@chris: No. But you can either remove the 8.3 names from your system (will likely save you a lot of trouble later), or filter thedir
output withdir /b/s *.asp | findstr /ile .asp
-- this discards lines that do not end with.asp
.
– grawity
Jan 28 '11 at 14:19
according to this answer you can usefsutil 8dot3name strip directory
to remove the existing names, no need to rename them
– phuclv
Apr 22 '17 at 16:18
Why does FindFirstFile find short names?
– phuclv
Jun 12 '17 at 2:34
add a comment |
Well, that's a pretty good explanation of why - but it seems like there isn't a way to then force the dir command to ignore the aspx files?
– chris
Jan 28 '11 at 14:17
1
@chris: No. But you can either remove the 8.3 names from your system (will likely save you a lot of trouble later), or filter thedir
output withdir /b/s *.asp | findstr /ile .asp
-- this discards lines that do not end with.asp
.
– grawity
Jan 28 '11 at 14:19
according to this answer you can usefsutil 8dot3name strip directory
to remove the existing names, no need to rename them
– phuclv
Apr 22 '17 at 16:18
Why does FindFirstFile find short names?
– phuclv
Jun 12 '17 at 2:34
Well, that's a pretty good explanation of why - but it seems like there isn't a way to then force the dir command to ignore the aspx files?
– chris
Jan 28 '11 at 14:17
Well, that's a pretty good explanation of why - but it seems like there isn't a way to then force the dir command to ignore the aspx files?
– chris
Jan 28 '11 at 14:17
1
1
@chris: No. But you can either remove the 8.3 names from your system (will likely save you a lot of trouble later), or filter the
dir
output with dir /b/s *.asp | findstr /ile .asp
-- this discards lines that do not end with .asp
.– grawity
Jan 28 '11 at 14:19
@chris: No. But you can either remove the 8.3 names from your system (will likely save you a lot of trouble later), or filter the
dir
output with dir /b/s *.asp | findstr /ile .asp
-- this discards lines that do not end with .asp
.– grawity
Jan 28 '11 at 14:19
according to this answer you can use
fsutil 8dot3name strip directory
to remove the existing names, no need to rename them– phuclv
Apr 22 '17 at 16:18
according to this answer you can use
fsutil 8dot3name strip directory
to remove the existing names, no need to rename them– phuclv
Apr 22 '17 at 16:18
Why does FindFirstFile find short names?
– phuclv
Jun 12 '17 at 2:34
Why does FindFirstFile find short names?
– phuclv
Jun 12 '17 at 2:34
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Of course this varies according to what command interpreter's DIR
command one uses. The DIR
command in Take Command, for example, only matches long names by default and so doesn't exhibit this behaviour. (Matching of short as well as long names can be turned on for compatibility with CMD's DIR
command.) So there are ways to address this that don't require FSUTIL
and administrator privileges.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Of course this varies according to what command interpreter's DIR
command one uses. The DIR
command in Take Command, for example, only matches long names by default and so doesn't exhibit this behaviour. (Matching of short as well as long names can be turned on for compatibility with CMD's DIR
command.) So there are ways to address this that don't require FSUTIL
and administrator privileges.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Of course this varies according to what command interpreter's DIR
command one uses. The DIR
command in Take Command, for example, only matches long names by default and so doesn't exhibit this behaviour. (Matching of short as well as long names can be turned on for compatibility with CMD's DIR
command.) So there are ways to address this that don't require FSUTIL
and administrator privileges.
Of course this varies according to what command interpreter's DIR
command one uses. The DIR
command in Take Command, for example, only matches long names by default and so doesn't exhibit this behaviour. (Matching of short as well as long names can be turned on for compatibility with CMD's DIR
command.) So there are ways to address this that don't require FSUTIL
and administrator privileges.
answered Feb 22 '11 at 17:27
JdeBP
22.4k14890
22.4k14890
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Interesting - seems to be a bug...
Considering, I would pipe it through find like so:
dir /s *.asp | find /i /v ".aspx "
it's not a bug, as per grawity's answer. But why do you leave a space at the end of aspx?
– phuclv
Mar 29 '17 at 1:49
1
@phuclv, the trailing space must be removed, because it becaome part of the search string otherwise; anyway, this approach would also exclude files that have.aspx
somewhere in the middle of their names, likefile.aspx.name.asp
, which should actually be included...
– aschipfl
Nov 28 at 13:07
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Interesting - seems to be a bug...
Considering, I would pipe it through find like so:
dir /s *.asp | find /i /v ".aspx "
it's not a bug, as per grawity's answer. But why do you leave a space at the end of aspx?
– phuclv
Mar 29 '17 at 1:49
1
@phuclv, the trailing space must be removed, because it becaome part of the search string otherwise; anyway, this approach would also exclude files that have.aspx
somewhere in the middle of their names, likefile.aspx.name.asp
, which should actually be included...
– aschipfl
Nov 28 at 13:07
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Interesting - seems to be a bug...
Considering, I would pipe it through find like so:
dir /s *.asp | find /i /v ".aspx "
Interesting - seems to be a bug...
Considering, I would pipe it through find like so:
dir /s *.asp | find /i /v ".aspx "
edited Jul 18 '12 at 22:25
Tom Wijsman
50k23164244
50k23164244
answered Jan 28 '11 at 13:29
Multiverse IT
4,0881219
4,0881219
it's not a bug, as per grawity's answer. But why do you leave a space at the end of aspx?
– phuclv
Mar 29 '17 at 1:49
1
@phuclv, the trailing space must be removed, because it becaome part of the search string otherwise; anyway, this approach would also exclude files that have.aspx
somewhere in the middle of their names, likefile.aspx.name.asp
, which should actually be included...
– aschipfl
Nov 28 at 13:07
add a comment |
it's not a bug, as per grawity's answer. But why do you leave a space at the end of aspx?
– phuclv
Mar 29 '17 at 1:49
1
@phuclv, the trailing space must be removed, because it becaome part of the search string otherwise; anyway, this approach would also exclude files that have.aspx
somewhere in the middle of their names, likefile.aspx.name.asp
, which should actually be included...
– aschipfl
Nov 28 at 13:07
it's not a bug, as per grawity's answer. But why do you leave a space at the end of aspx?
– phuclv
Mar 29 '17 at 1:49
it's not a bug, as per grawity's answer. But why do you leave a space at the end of aspx?
– phuclv
Mar 29 '17 at 1:49
1
1
@phuclv, the trailing space must be removed, because it becaome part of the search string otherwise; anyway, this approach would also exclude files that have
.aspx
somewhere in the middle of their names, like file.aspx.name.asp
, which should actually be included...– aschipfl
Nov 28 at 13:07
@phuclv, the trailing space must be removed, because it becaome part of the search string otherwise; anyway, this approach would also exclude files that have
.aspx
somewhere in the middle of their names, like file.aspx.name.asp
, which should actually be included...– aschipfl
Nov 28 at 13:07
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
If you have PowerShell, you can use:
dir *.asp -r | remove-item
If you don't have PowerShell, why not?
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
If you have PowerShell, you can use:
dir *.asp -r | remove-item
If you don't have PowerShell, why not?
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
If you have PowerShell, you can use:
dir *.asp -r | remove-item
If you don't have PowerShell, why not?
If you have PowerShell, you can use:
dir *.asp -r | remove-item
If you don't have PowerShell, why not?
answered Aug 25 '13 at 16:00
Peter Hahndorf
8,55953658
8,55953658
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
As user grawity anready said in their answer, it is because the wildcards used by cmd
's internal commands and several external ones also match against 8.3 file names, which are enabled by default.
To work around that, there are several ways, some of which I want to show you:
You can use findstr
to filter the file names returned by dir
:
dir /S /B /A:-D "*.asp" | findstr /IEC:".asp"
This does not even match files that have .asp
somewhere in their names (like file.asp.aspx
), nor does it exclude files that have .aspx
in their names (like file.aspx.asp
).
The switch /B
lets dir
return a pure list of file names/paths, which can be filtered properly. The option /A:-D
excludes any matching directories.
Alternatively, the where
command could be used, which handles wildcards differently than dir
:
where /R "." "*.asp"
The disadvantage is that this command also regards the content of the PATHEXT
variable, so this would also match a file that end in .asp.exe
, given that .EXE
is contained in PATHEXT
; to avoid that, you could temporarily clear the PATHEXT
variable (by set "PATHEXT_BACKUP=%PATHEXT%" & set "PATHEXT="
) and restore it later (by set "PATHEXT=%PATHEXT_BACKUP%" & set "PATHEXT_BACKUP="
).
This answer by user Konrad shows a way to change the default behaviour of creating 8.3 file names of items with an extension with more than 3 characters, which in turn prevents most of such unintended matches. But unfortunately this does not change any current 8.3 file names. And of course there could theoretically be situations where the 8.3 file names are still matching although quite unlikely.
I have to admit that I did not yet test this...
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
As user grawity anready said in their answer, it is because the wildcards used by cmd
's internal commands and several external ones also match against 8.3 file names, which are enabled by default.
To work around that, there are several ways, some of which I want to show you:
You can use findstr
to filter the file names returned by dir
:
dir /S /B /A:-D "*.asp" | findstr /IEC:".asp"
This does not even match files that have .asp
somewhere in their names (like file.asp.aspx
), nor does it exclude files that have .aspx
in their names (like file.aspx.asp
).
The switch /B
lets dir
return a pure list of file names/paths, which can be filtered properly. The option /A:-D
excludes any matching directories.
Alternatively, the where
command could be used, which handles wildcards differently than dir
:
where /R "." "*.asp"
The disadvantage is that this command also regards the content of the PATHEXT
variable, so this would also match a file that end in .asp.exe
, given that .EXE
is contained in PATHEXT
; to avoid that, you could temporarily clear the PATHEXT
variable (by set "PATHEXT_BACKUP=%PATHEXT%" & set "PATHEXT="
) and restore it later (by set "PATHEXT=%PATHEXT_BACKUP%" & set "PATHEXT_BACKUP="
).
This answer by user Konrad shows a way to change the default behaviour of creating 8.3 file names of items with an extension with more than 3 characters, which in turn prevents most of such unintended matches. But unfortunately this does not change any current 8.3 file names. And of course there could theoretically be situations where the 8.3 file names are still matching although quite unlikely.
I have to admit that I did not yet test this...
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
As user grawity anready said in their answer, it is because the wildcards used by cmd
's internal commands and several external ones also match against 8.3 file names, which are enabled by default.
To work around that, there are several ways, some of which I want to show you:
You can use findstr
to filter the file names returned by dir
:
dir /S /B /A:-D "*.asp" | findstr /IEC:".asp"
This does not even match files that have .asp
somewhere in their names (like file.asp.aspx
), nor does it exclude files that have .aspx
in their names (like file.aspx.asp
).
The switch /B
lets dir
return a pure list of file names/paths, which can be filtered properly. The option /A:-D
excludes any matching directories.
Alternatively, the where
command could be used, which handles wildcards differently than dir
:
where /R "." "*.asp"
The disadvantage is that this command also regards the content of the PATHEXT
variable, so this would also match a file that end in .asp.exe
, given that .EXE
is contained in PATHEXT
; to avoid that, you could temporarily clear the PATHEXT
variable (by set "PATHEXT_BACKUP=%PATHEXT%" & set "PATHEXT="
) and restore it later (by set "PATHEXT=%PATHEXT_BACKUP%" & set "PATHEXT_BACKUP="
).
This answer by user Konrad shows a way to change the default behaviour of creating 8.3 file names of items with an extension with more than 3 characters, which in turn prevents most of such unintended matches. But unfortunately this does not change any current 8.3 file names. And of course there could theoretically be situations where the 8.3 file names are still matching although quite unlikely.
I have to admit that I did not yet test this...
As user grawity anready said in their answer, it is because the wildcards used by cmd
's internal commands and several external ones also match against 8.3 file names, which are enabled by default.
To work around that, there are several ways, some of which I want to show you:
You can use findstr
to filter the file names returned by dir
:
dir /S /B /A:-D "*.asp" | findstr /IEC:".asp"
This does not even match files that have .asp
somewhere in their names (like file.asp.aspx
), nor does it exclude files that have .aspx
in their names (like file.aspx.asp
).
The switch /B
lets dir
return a pure list of file names/paths, which can be filtered properly. The option /A:-D
excludes any matching directories.
Alternatively, the where
command could be used, which handles wildcards differently than dir
:
where /R "." "*.asp"
The disadvantage is that this command also regards the content of the PATHEXT
variable, so this would also match a file that end in .asp.exe
, given that .EXE
is contained in PATHEXT
; to avoid that, you could temporarily clear the PATHEXT
variable (by set "PATHEXT_BACKUP=%PATHEXT%" & set "PATHEXT="
) and restore it later (by set "PATHEXT=%PATHEXT_BACKUP%" & set "PATHEXT_BACKUP="
).
This answer by user Konrad shows a way to change the default behaviour of creating 8.3 file names of items with an extension with more than 3 characters, which in turn prevents most of such unintended matches. But unfortunately this does not change any current 8.3 file names. And of course there could theoretically be situations where the 8.3 file names are still matching although quite unlikely.
I have to admit that I did not yet test this...
answered Nov 28 at 13:04
aschipfl
216113
216113
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f238900%2fwinxp-dir-command-3-and-4-char-extensions-are-the-same%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown