PF rule using return-rst on Mac OS X does not reply with TCP reset











up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1












I'm trying to add a simple PF rule:



block return-rst out proto tcp from any to any port 33128


to filter all outgoing traffic to TCP port 33128, and I'd like it to respond with a reset. However, when I test it with nc, it times out, instead of returning right away with a connection refused error, which suggests packets going to port 33128 are dropped without a TCP reset being sent:



$ nc -v 172.22.2.2 33128
nc: connectx to 172.22.2.2 port 33128 (tcp) failed: Operation timed out


The way I enable PF and add this rule:



$ echo "block return-rst out proto tcp from any to any port 33128" > pf.conf
$ sudo pfctl -f pf.conf
$ sudo pfctl -e


What's wrong with this rule?










share|improve this question
























  • having the same issue. I'm trying to use pfctl to simulate a completely dead connection to a specific domain for some tests, but all i get is a timeout
    – Fernando Mazzon
    Jul 30 '15 at 18:40










  • What version of MacOS are you running? This works perfectly for me on 10.10. I assume pfctl -e returns without error?
    – eradman
    Aug 5 '15 at 14:42












  • @eradman Running 10.10 too. $ sudo pfctl -e No ALTQ support in kernel ALTQ related functions disabled pfctl: pf already enabled. Other rules work just fine, it's just this rule having issues, getting timeouts instead of reset
    – Fernando Mazzon
    Aug 10 '15 at 12:42

















up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1












I'm trying to add a simple PF rule:



block return-rst out proto tcp from any to any port 33128


to filter all outgoing traffic to TCP port 33128, and I'd like it to respond with a reset. However, when I test it with nc, it times out, instead of returning right away with a connection refused error, which suggests packets going to port 33128 are dropped without a TCP reset being sent:



$ nc -v 172.22.2.2 33128
nc: connectx to 172.22.2.2 port 33128 (tcp) failed: Operation timed out


The way I enable PF and add this rule:



$ echo "block return-rst out proto tcp from any to any port 33128" > pf.conf
$ sudo pfctl -f pf.conf
$ sudo pfctl -e


What's wrong with this rule?










share|improve this question
























  • having the same issue. I'm trying to use pfctl to simulate a completely dead connection to a specific domain for some tests, but all i get is a timeout
    – Fernando Mazzon
    Jul 30 '15 at 18:40










  • What version of MacOS are you running? This works perfectly for me on 10.10. I assume pfctl -e returns without error?
    – eradman
    Aug 5 '15 at 14:42












  • @eradman Running 10.10 too. $ sudo pfctl -e No ALTQ support in kernel ALTQ related functions disabled pfctl: pf already enabled. Other rules work just fine, it's just this rule having issues, getting timeouts instead of reset
    – Fernando Mazzon
    Aug 10 '15 at 12:42















up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1






1





I'm trying to add a simple PF rule:



block return-rst out proto tcp from any to any port 33128


to filter all outgoing traffic to TCP port 33128, and I'd like it to respond with a reset. However, when I test it with nc, it times out, instead of returning right away with a connection refused error, which suggests packets going to port 33128 are dropped without a TCP reset being sent:



$ nc -v 172.22.2.2 33128
nc: connectx to 172.22.2.2 port 33128 (tcp) failed: Operation timed out


The way I enable PF and add this rule:



$ echo "block return-rst out proto tcp from any to any port 33128" > pf.conf
$ sudo pfctl -f pf.conf
$ sudo pfctl -e


What's wrong with this rule?










share|improve this question















I'm trying to add a simple PF rule:



block return-rst out proto tcp from any to any port 33128


to filter all outgoing traffic to TCP port 33128, and I'd like it to respond with a reset. However, when I test it with nc, it times out, instead of returning right away with a connection refused error, which suggests packets going to port 33128 are dropped without a TCP reset being sent:



$ nc -v 172.22.2.2 33128
nc: connectx to 172.22.2.2 port 33128 (tcp) failed: Operation timed out


The way I enable PF and add this rule:



$ echo "block return-rst out proto tcp from any to any port 33128" > pf.conf
$ sudo pfctl -f pf.conf
$ sudo pfctl -e


What's wrong with this rule?







macos networking firewall bsd pf






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Apr 9 '15 at 20:50

























asked Apr 9 '15 at 20:46









ldx

1115




1115












  • having the same issue. I'm trying to use pfctl to simulate a completely dead connection to a specific domain for some tests, but all i get is a timeout
    – Fernando Mazzon
    Jul 30 '15 at 18:40










  • What version of MacOS are you running? This works perfectly for me on 10.10. I assume pfctl -e returns without error?
    – eradman
    Aug 5 '15 at 14:42












  • @eradman Running 10.10 too. $ sudo pfctl -e No ALTQ support in kernel ALTQ related functions disabled pfctl: pf already enabled. Other rules work just fine, it's just this rule having issues, getting timeouts instead of reset
    – Fernando Mazzon
    Aug 10 '15 at 12:42




















  • having the same issue. I'm trying to use pfctl to simulate a completely dead connection to a specific domain for some tests, but all i get is a timeout
    – Fernando Mazzon
    Jul 30 '15 at 18:40










  • What version of MacOS are you running? This works perfectly for me on 10.10. I assume pfctl -e returns without error?
    – eradman
    Aug 5 '15 at 14:42












  • @eradman Running 10.10 too. $ sudo pfctl -e No ALTQ support in kernel ALTQ related functions disabled pfctl: pf already enabled. Other rules work just fine, it's just this rule having issues, getting timeouts instead of reset
    – Fernando Mazzon
    Aug 10 '15 at 12:42


















having the same issue. I'm trying to use pfctl to simulate a completely dead connection to a specific domain for some tests, but all i get is a timeout
– Fernando Mazzon
Jul 30 '15 at 18:40




having the same issue. I'm trying to use pfctl to simulate a completely dead connection to a specific domain for some tests, but all i get is a timeout
– Fernando Mazzon
Jul 30 '15 at 18:40












What version of MacOS are you running? This works perfectly for me on 10.10. I assume pfctl -e returns without error?
– eradman
Aug 5 '15 at 14:42






What version of MacOS are you running? This works perfectly for me on 10.10. I assume pfctl -e returns without error?
– eradman
Aug 5 '15 at 14:42














@eradman Running 10.10 too. $ sudo pfctl -e No ALTQ support in kernel ALTQ related functions disabled pfctl: pf already enabled. Other rules work just fine, it's just this rule having issues, getting timeouts instead of reset
– Fernando Mazzon
Aug 10 '15 at 12:42






@eradman Running 10.10 too. $ sudo pfctl -e No ALTQ support in kernel ALTQ related functions disabled pfctl: pf already enabled. Other rules work just fine, it's just this rule having issues, getting timeouts instead of reset
– Fernando Mazzon
Aug 10 '15 at 12:42












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote













I found that some of PF firewall rules work incorrectly after Thunderbolt Ethernet is connected, but work correctly when WiFi is the only network adapter. For example, action "return-rst" does not return TCP RST packets .



Update

I figured out that this bug affects any wired ethernet connection. Even built-in iMac ethernet adapter vs built-in WiFi adapter. Tested on old and newer iMac's.



Steps to Reproduce:
In the first step let's try correct behaviour. To do so, we need macbook/iMac with WiFi only connection, no Thunderbolt Ethernet connected.




  1. Flush all PF rules
    sudo pfctl -F all


  2. Create simple rule to block TCP connection to port 81, that should return TCP RST packet to abort connection instantly.
    echo "block return-rst out proto tcp from any to any port 81" | sudo pfctl -e -f -


  3. Check if the new rule was added correctly.

    Here we can see the counter of packets that match firewall rule.
    pfctl -vsr
    Packets: 0 Bytes: 0


  4. Now trying to test firewall rule using curl that connects to port 81
    curl http://example.com:81
    curl: (7) Failed to connect to example.com port 81: Connection refused



See that connection refused immediately by firewall rule as expected. It's a correct behaviour.



Now test the incorrect behaviour. To do so we need to connect genuine Apple Thunderbolt Ethernet with active wired connection. WiFi connection can be disabled or stay enabled, this does not matter, bug will appear in both cases.




  1. Leave firewall rules the same


  2. Trying to use curl again
    curl http://example.com:81
    .....waiting....
    curl: (28) Connection timed out


    Now connection is hanging and closes after a while by timeout. But the firewall rule is still active and working.


  3. We can look at the packet counters
    pfctl -vsr
    and see that rule is matching and still blocking the connection. But without TCP RST reply.



My setup:

macOS: 10.14.1 (18B75)

MacBook Pro (Retina, 15-inch, Mid 2015)

Apple Thunderbolt 2 Ethernet adapter (57762)






share|improve this answer























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "3"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f899780%2fpf-rule-using-return-rst-on-mac-os-x-does-not-reply-with-tcp-reset%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    0
    down vote













    I found that some of PF firewall rules work incorrectly after Thunderbolt Ethernet is connected, but work correctly when WiFi is the only network adapter. For example, action "return-rst" does not return TCP RST packets .



    Update

    I figured out that this bug affects any wired ethernet connection. Even built-in iMac ethernet adapter vs built-in WiFi adapter. Tested on old and newer iMac's.



    Steps to Reproduce:
    In the first step let's try correct behaviour. To do so, we need macbook/iMac with WiFi only connection, no Thunderbolt Ethernet connected.




    1. Flush all PF rules
      sudo pfctl -F all


    2. Create simple rule to block TCP connection to port 81, that should return TCP RST packet to abort connection instantly.
      echo "block return-rst out proto tcp from any to any port 81" | sudo pfctl -e -f -


    3. Check if the new rule was added correctly.

      Here we can see the counter of packets that match firewall rule.
      pfctl -vsr
      Packets: 0 Bytes: 0


    4. Now trying to test firewall rule using curl that connects to port 81
      curl http://example.com:81
      curl: (7) Failed to connect to example.com port 81: Connection refused



    See that connection refused immediately by firewall rule as expected. It's a correct behaviour.



    Now test the incorrect behaviour. To do so we need to connect genuine Apple Thunderbolt Ethernet with active wired connection. WiFi connection can be disabled or stay enabled, this does not matter, bug will appear in both cases.




    1. Leave firewall rules the same


    2. Trying to use curl again
      curl http://example.com:81
      .....waiting....
      curl: (28) Connection timed out


      Now connection is hanging and closes after a while by timeout. But the firewall rule is still active and working.


    3. We can look at the packet counters
      pfctl -vsr
      and see that rule is matching and still blocking the connection. But without TCP RST reply.



    My setup:

    macOS: 10.14.1 (18B75)

    MacBook Pro (Retina, 15-inch, Mid 2015)

    Apple Thunderbolt 2 Ethernet adapter (57762)






    share|improve this answer



























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      I found that some of PF firewall rules work incorrectly after Thunderbolt Ethernet is connected, but work correctly when WiFi is the only network adapter. For example, action "return-rst" does not return TCP RST packets .



      Update

      I figured out that this bug affects any wired ethernet connection. Even built-in iMac ethernet adapter vs built-in WiFi adapter. Tested on old and newer iMac's.



      Steps to Reproduce:
      In the first step let's try correct behaviour. To do so, we need macbook/iMac with WiFi only connection, no Thunderbolt Ethernet connected.




      1. Flush all PF rules
        sudo pfctl -F all


      2. Create simple rule to block TCP connection to port 81, that should return TCP RST packet to abort connection instantly.
        echo "block return-rst out proto tcp from any to any port 81" | sudo pfctl -e -f -


      3. Check if the new rule was added correctly.

        Here we can see the counter of packets that match firewall rule.
        pfctl -vsr
        Packets: 0 Bytes: 0


      4. Now trying to test firewall rule using curl that connects to port 81
        curl http://example.com:81
        curl: (7) Failed to connect to example.com port 81: Connection refused



      See that connection refused immediately by firewall rule as expected. It's a correct behaviour.



      Now test the incorrect behaviour. To do so we need to connect genuine Apple Thunderbolt Ethernet with active wired connection. WiFi connection can be disabled or stay enabled, this does not matter, bug will appear in both cases.




      1. Leave firewall rules the same


      2. Trying to use curl again
        curl http://example.com:81
        .....waiting....
        curl: (28) Connection timed out


        Now connection is hanging and closes after a while by timeout. But the firewall rule is still active and working.


      3. We can look at the packet counters
        pfctl -vsr
        and see that rule is matching and still blocking the connection. But without TCP RST reply.



      My setup:

      macOS: 10.14.1 (18B75)

      MacBook Pro (Retina, 15-inch, Mid 2015)

      Apple Thunderbolt 2 Ethernet adapter (57762)






      share|improve this answer

























        up vote
        0
        down vote










        up vote
        0
        down vote









        I found that some of PF firewall rules work incorrectly after Thunderbolt Ethernet is connected, but work correctly when WiFi is the only network adapter. For example, action "return-rst" does not return TCP RST packets .



        Update

        I figured out that this bug affects any wired ethernet connection. Even built-in iMac ethernet adapter vs built-in WiFi adapter. Tested on old and newer iMac's.



        Steps to Reproduce:
        In the first step let's try correct behaviour. To do so, we need macbook/iMac with WiFi only connection, no Thunderbolt Ethernet connected.




        1. Flush all PF rules
          sudo pfctl -F all


        2. Create simple rule to block TCP connection to port 81, that should return TCP RST packet to abort connection instantly.
          echo "block return-rst out proto tcp from any to any port 81" | sudo pfctl -e -f -


        3. Check if the new rule was added correctly.

          Here we can see the counter of packets that match firewall rule.
          pfctl -vsr
          Packets: 0 Bytes: 0


        4. Now trying to test firewall rule using curl that connects to port 81
          curl http://example.com:81
          curl: (7) Failed to connect to example.com port 81: Connection refused



        See that connection refused immediately by firewall rule as expected. It's a correct behaviour.



        Now test the incorrect behaviour. To do so we need to connect genuine Apple Thunderbolt Ethernet with active wired connection. WiFi connection can be disabled or stay enabled, this does not matter, bug will appear in both cases.




        1. Leave firewall rules the same


        2. Trying to use curl again
          curl http://example.com:81
          .....waiting....
          curl: (28) Connection timed out


          Now connection is hanging and closes after a while by timeout. But the firewall rule is still active and working.


        3. We can look at the packet counters
          pfctl -vsr
          and see that rule is matching and still blocking the connection. But without TCP RST reply.



        My setup:

        macOS: 10.14.1 (18B75)

        MacBook Pro (Retina, 15-inch, Mid 2015)

        Apple Thunderbolt 2 Ethernet adapter (57762)






        share|improve this answer














        I found that some of PF firewall rules work incorrectly after Thunderbolt Ethernet is connected, but work correctly when WiFi is the only network adapter. For example, action "return-rst" does not return TCP RST packets .



        Update

        I figured out that this bug affects any wired ethernet connection. Even built-in iMac ethernet adapter vs built-in WiFi adapter. Tested on old and newer iMac's.



        Steps to Reproduce:
        In the first step let's try correct behaviour. To do so, we need macbook/iMac with WiFi only connection, no Thunderbolt Ethernet connected.




        1. Flush all PF rules
          sudo pfctl -F all


        2. Create simple rule to block TCP connection to port 81, that should return TCP RST packet to abort connection instantly.
          echo "block return-rst out proto tcp from any to any port 81" | sudo pfctl -e -f -


        3. Check if the new rule was added correctly.

          Here we can see the counter of packets that match firewall rule.
          pfctl -vsr
          Packets: 0 Bytes: 0


        4. Now trying to test firewall rule using curl that connects to port 81
          curl http://example.com:81
          curl: (7) Failed to connect to example.com port 81: Connection refused



        See that connection refused immediately by firewall rule as expected. It's a correct behaviour.



        Now test the incorrect behaviour. To do so we need to connect genuine Apple Thunderbolt Ethernet with active wired connection. WiFi connection can be disabled or stay enabled, this does not matter, bug will appear in both cases.




        1. Leave firewall rules the same


        2. Trying to use curl again
          curl http://example.com:81
          .....waiting....
          curl: (28) Connection timed out


          Now connection is hanging and closes after a while by timeout. But the firewall rule is still active and working.


        3. We can look at the packet counters
          pfctl -vsr
          and see that rule is matching and still blocking the connection. But without TCP RST reply.



        My setup:

        macOS: 10.14.1 (18B75)

        MacBook Pro (Retina, 15-inch, Mid 2015)

        Apple Thunderbolt 2 Ethernet adapter (57762)







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Nov 28 at 13:59

























        answered Nov 28 at 11:52









        zhovner

        12




        12






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f899780%2fpf-rule-using-return-rst-on-mac-os-x-does-not-reply-with-tcp-reset%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Сан-Квентин

            8-я гвардейская общевойсковая армия

            Алькесар