How to create a video from images using FFmpeg?
Is it possible to use ffmpeg
create a video from a set of sequences, where the number does not start from zero?
For example, I have some images [test_100.jpg, test_101.jpg, test_102.jpg, ..., test_200.jpg], and I want to convert them to a video. I tried the following command, but it didn't work (it seems the number should start from zero):
ffmpeg -i test_%d.jpg -vcodec mpeg4 test.avi
Any advise?
linux ffmpeg
migrated from stackoverflow.com Jul 26 '13 at 13:48
This question came from our site for professional and enthusiast programmers.
add a comment |
Is it possible to use ffmpeg
create a video from a set of sequences, where the number does not start from zero?
For example, I have some images [test_100.jpg, test_101.jpg, test_102.jpg, ..., test_200.jpg], and I want to convert them to a video. I tried the following command, but it didn't work (it seems the number should start from zero):
ffmpeg -i test_%d.jpg -vcodec mpeg4 test.avi
Any advise?
linux ffmpeg
migrated from stackoverflow.com Jul 26 '13 at 13:48
This question came from our site for professional and enthusiast programmers.
It's been a while since you asked this, but if you're still interested in the question, the answer is YES -- I've posted the details and an example below: stackoverflow.com/a/12160155/181638
– Assad Ebrahim
Aug 28 '12 at 13:20
@casperOne would be useful to have an idea why this is off topic. It seems like a specific programming problem. The FFmpeg tag has 3.7k followers, and with 27k views clearly people find it useful..
– geotheory
May 20 '13 at 10:36
2
@geotheory The tag stats are irrelevant. ffmpeg is a program much in the way of say, WinRar. While you can program against the libraries in ffmpeg, this question is not about that. Using ffmpeg from the command line is to be asked on Super User, where it's on topic.
– casperOne
May 20 '13 at 11:45
add a comment |
Is it possible to use ffmpeg
create a video from a set of sequences, where the number does not start from zero?
For example, I have some images [test_100.jpg, test_101.jpg, test_102.jpg, ..., test_200.jpg], and I want to convert them to a video. I tried the following command, but it didn't work (it seems the number should start from zero):
ffmpeg -i test_%d.jpg -vcodec mpeg4 test.avi
Any advise?
linux ffmpeg
Is it possible to use ffmpeg
create a video from a set of sequences, where the number does not start from zero?
For example, I have some images [test_100.jpg, test_101.jpg, test_102.jpg, ..., test_200.jpg], and I want to convert them to a video. I tried the following command, but it didn't work (it seems the number should start from zero):
ffmpeg -i test_%d.jpg -vcodec mpeg4 test.avi
Any advise?
linux ffmpeg
linux ffmpeg
edited Jul 5 '17 at 13:35
JakeGould
32k1098140
32k1098140
asked May 13 '10 at 17:58
vailen
migrated from stackoverflow.com Jul 26 '13 at 13:48
This question came from our site for professional and enthusiast programmers.
migrated from stackoverflow.com Jul 26 '13 at 13:48
This question came from our site for professional and enthusiast programmers.
It's been a while since you asked this, but if you're still interested in the question, the answer is YES -- I've posted the details and an example below: stackoverflow.com/a/12160155/181638
– Assad Ebrahim
Aug 28 '12 at 13:20
@casperOne would be useful to have an idea why this is off topic. It seems like a specific programming problem. The FFmpeg tag has 3.7k followers, and with 27k views clearly people find it useful..
– geotheory
May 20 '13 at 10:36
2
@geotheory The tag stats are irrelevant. ffmpeg is a program much in the way of say, WinRar. While you can program against the libraries in ffmpeg, this question is not about that. Using ffmpeg from the command line is to be asked on Super User, where it's on topic.
– casperOne
May 20 '13 at 11:45
add a comment |
It's been a while since you asked this, but if you're still interested in the question, the answer is YES -- I've posted the details and an example below: stackoverflow.com/a/12160155/181638
– Assad Ebrahim
Aug 28 '12 at 13:20
@casperOne would be useful to have an idea why this is off topic. It seems like a specific programming problem. The FFmpeg tag has 3.7k followers, and with 27k views clearly people find it useful..
– geotheory
May 20 '13 at 10:36
2
@geotheory The tag stats are irrelevant. ffmpeg is a program much in the way of say, WinRar. While you can program against the libraries in ffmpeg, this question is not about that. Using ffmpeg from the command line is to be asked on Super User, where it's on topic.
– casperOne
May 20 '13 at 11:45
It's been a while since you asked this, but if you're still interested in the question, the answer is YES -- I've posted the details and an example below: stackoverflow.com/a/12160155/181638
– Assad Ebrahim
Aug 28 '12 at 13:20
It's been a while since you asked this, but if you're still interested in the question, the answer is YES -- I've posted the details and an example below: stackoverflow.com/a/12160155/181638
– Assad Ebrahim
Aug 28 '12 at 13:20
@casperOne would be useful to have an idea why this is off topic. It seems like a specific programming problem. The FFmpeg tag has 3.7k followers, and with 27k views clearly people find it useful..
– geotheory
May 20 '13 at 10:36
@casperOne would be useful to have an idea why this is off topic. It seems like a specific programming problem. The FFmpeg tag has 3.7k followers, and with 27k views clearly people find it useful..
– geotheory
May 20 '13 at 10:36
2
2
@geotheory The tag stats are irrelevant. ffmpeg is a program much in the way of say, WinRar. While you can program against the libraries in ffmpeg, this question is not about that. Using ffmpeg from the command line is to be asked on Super User, where it's on topic.
– casperOne
May 20 '13 at 11:45
@geotheory The tag stats are irrelevant. ffmpeg is a program much in the way of say, WinRar. While you can program against the libraries in ffmpeg, this question is not about that. Using ffmpeg from the command line is to be asked on Super User, where it's on topic.
– casperOne
May 20 '13 at 11:45
add a comment |
12 Answers
12
active
oldest
votes
There is no need to rename files if using the -start_number
switch like so:
ffmpeg -start_number n -i test_%d.jpg -vcodec mpeg4 test.avi
where n
is the start of the sequence of stills.
Note, this will work as long as the sequence is unbroken once it starts. If there are gaps and you want all of the stills included, then renumbering may be necessary to fill the gaps.
There are some other switches you might find useful.
I use the following one liner to get a slower frame rate and to compress the images and have a smaller resulting video:
ffmpeg.exe -f image2 -framerate 25 -pattern_type sequence -start_number 1234
-r 3 -i Imgp%04d.jpg -s 720x480 test.avi
The -r 3
option sets the framerate of the resulting video to 3 frames per second so that I can see each still for a short period of time. The -s
option rescales the pictures to the desired resolution to manage the size of the resulting video.
(In the Windows shell, replace -i Imgp%04d.jpg
with -i "Imgp%%04d.jpg"
. Credit for this to Mike Fitzpatrick https://superuser.com/a/344178/153054)
4
what's the difference between -r and -framerate?
– nuno_cruz
Oct 24 '12 at 20:21
1
they're the same IIRC
– rogerdpack
Feb 18 '13 at 16:34
21
No need for numbering nonsense, as long as you're happy to accept the order they appear in (say) 'ls'... just use: ffmpeg -pattern_type glob -i '*.jpg' movie.mp4
– Orwellophile
Nov 3 '13 at 5:32
2
Is there any switch to control the time gap between images,say, I'd like to show the first image 13s,the second 15s,24s for the third,time gap is user defined,is that possible?
– zionpi
Feb 26 '16 at 8:00
2
see also trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/…
– d3vid
Apr 20 '16 at 8:43
add a comment |
you can use this below code snippet:
cat *.jpg | ffmpeg -f image2pipe -r 1 -vcodec mjpeg -i - -vcodec libx264 out.mp4
This does not rotate JPGs to the rotation stated in metadata.
– Erik Johansson
Oct 13 '15 at 8:16
add a comment |
You can find an example script in the ffmpeg documentation:
3.2 How do I encode single pictures into movies?
If you have large number of pictures to rename, you can use the following command to ease the burden. The command, using the bourne shell syntax, symbolically links all files in the current directory that match *jpg to the
/tmp' directory in the sequence of
img001.jpg', `img002.jpg' and so on.
x=1; for i in *jpg; do counter=$(printf %03d $x); ln "$i" /tmp/img"$counter".jpg; x=$(($x+1)); done
Then run:
ffmpeg -f image2 -i /tmp/img%03d.jpg /tmp/a.mpg
2
You'd be better making x=0 to start so the image name's start img000.jpg as this is what ffmpeg expects. Also symlinking didn't work for me as ffmpeg couldn't find the files so I had to use cp instead (obvious speed and space draw backs but I rm them after anyway). mv would also work if you don't mind losing the originals.
– RyanfaeScotland
Mar 28 '13 at 14:21
Note that in this answer, the command provided creates hardlinks, not symlinks. Regarding the use ofcp
if linking doesn't work, if your filesystem supports itcp --reflink=auto
will achieve much better speed/space usage.
– Félix Saparelli
Jun 5 '15 at 1:00
add a comment |
From ffmpeg's docs:
Using a glob pattern
ffmpeg also supports bash-style globbing (* represents any number of any characters).
This is useful if your images are sequential but not necessarily in a numerically sequential order as in the previous examples.
ffmpeg -r 1 -pattern_type glob -i 'test_*.jpg' -c:v libx264 out.mp4
So, as long as your files are sorted, using the -pattern_type glob
switch should work for you.
Note that this glob is more limited than regular shell globs: trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/3620 apparently because image type is deduced from the extension.
– Ciro Santilli 新疆改造中心 六四事件 法轮功
Dec 17 '16 at 17:02
add a comment |
As far as I know, you cannot start the sequence in random numbers (I don't remember if you should start it at 0 or 1), plus, it cannot have gaps, if it does, ffmpeg will assume the sequence is over and stop adding more images.
Also, as stated in the comments to my answer, remember you need to specify the width of your index. Like:
image%03d.jpg
And if you use a %03d index type, you need to pad your filenames with 0, like :
image001.jpg
image002.jpg
image003.jpg
etc.
1
If the image file names have leading zeros then the format string must also specify the width like "%03d".
– Hudson
May 13 '10 at 18:17
1
If that's the only obstacle, you could just write a script to either rename or symlink your images to a properly reindexed set.
– Cascabel
May 13 '10 at 18:18
1
Yes, I've worked with this before, I wrote a wrapper in Ruby a while ago where you called instance.addImage(), then instance.processVideo() and it would create a temporal directory, copy/rename the images with proper indices and create the video. It is quite easy.
– Francisco Soto
May 13 '10 at 18:25
@Jefromi I have created a symlink but how do I give the path of the symlink file to ffmpeg? It just assumes the symlink file is the image I am trying to convert? I'm on win7 btw
– Jared Glass
Apr 12 '12 at 16:13
The sequence can start anywhere from 0 to 4 inclusive.
– Assad Ebrahim
Aug 28 '12 at 12:11
add a comment |
I agree with Francisco, but as a workaround you could just write a quick script to move or create symbolic links to the files with the sequence numbers that ffmpeg needs. The script could then call ffmpeg and then remove the links or move the files back to their original locations.
add a comment |
look up
x=1; for i in *jpg; do counter=$(printf %03d $x); ln "$i"
/tmp/img"$counter".jpg; x=$(($x+1)); done
add a comment |
I used the flv encoder since my video was going in a flash player (Jwplayer)
ffmpeg -i %d.jpg -vcodec flv test.flv
add a comment |
From the documentation, it seems you can simply use *
For example, for creating a video from filenames matching the glob pattern foo-*.jpeg:
ffmpeg -f image2 -pattern_type glob -framerate 12 -i 'foo-*.jpeg' -s WxH foo.avi
As a note, to improve affect the quality, the rate/fps might be important (eg, first specifying very low/high frame rate and then pass from a second filter that will make the slow motion video to normal?)
add a comment |
I know this is an old question but I came across it in Google while looking for the same answer. None of the answers here satisfied me completely so I did more searching and reading and this is a command that I came up with for my own problem.
cat {0032..1501}*.png | ffmpeg -f image2pipe -framerate 5 -i - -s 720x480 test2.avi
The reason why i'd use a command like this is...
- Cat and -f image2pipe give you finer control over what images you
use. For example it allows you to use bash features like bracket
expansion and other commands like grep to fine-tune your results
should you choose. - Fewer switches to remember.
- I recommend NOT using -r, and just use -framerate instead. In my
experience -r tends to drop frames more often. - Less complex, no unnecessary switches in use and it will work as-is.
You may add more complexity (for example, specifying encoder) and
fine tune to suit your needs.
For the OP's question,-start_number
is all that's needed.
– Gyan
Aug 4 '16 at 5:29
add a comment |
In my case, it was a little trickier because of the numbers in the files. Here's how my images look like:
$ ls | head -5
2014_aq_unprocessed 001.jpg
2014_aq_unprocessed 002.jpg
2014_aq_unprocessed 003.jpg
2014_aq_unprocessed 004.jpg
2014_aq_unprocessed 005.jpg
and here's the command I used:
ffmpeg -i 2014_aq_unprocessed %3d.jpg -vcodec mpeg4 test.avi
add a comment |
You can do this with convert -morph
:
convert *.jpg -delay 10 -morph 10 %05d.jpg
If you want to use ffmpeg
, I used
ffmpeg -pattern_type glob -i '*.jpg' -vf "setpts=10*PTS" movie.mp4
where the 10*PTS
tells ffmpeg to slow it down 10 times. You can also have fractions there to speed it up.
This is just interpolating your original image sequence to a new space, it doesn't create a video file like the OP asked.
– f0ster
Mar 18 '16 at 17:13
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "3"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f624567%2fhow-to-create-a-video-from-images-using-ffmpeg%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
12 Answers
12
active
oldest
votes
12 Answers
12
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
There is no need to rename files if using the -start_number
switch like so:
ffmpeg -start_number n -i test_%d.jpg -vcodec mpeg4 test.avi
where n
is the start of the sequence of stills.
Note, this will work as long as the sequence is unbroken once it starts. If there are gaps and you want all of the stills included, then renumbering may be necessary to fill the gaps.
There are some other switches you might find useful.
I use the following one liner to get a slower frame rate and to compress the images and have a smaller resulting video:
ffmpeg.exe -f image2 -framerate 25 -pattern_type sequence -start_number 1234
-r 3 -i Imgp%04d.jpg -s 720x480 test.avi
The -r 3
option sets the framerate of the resulting video to 3 frames per second so that I can see each still for a short period of time. The -s
option rescales the pictures to the desired resolution to manage the size of the resulting video.
(In the Windows shell, replace -i Imgp%04d.jpg
with -i "Imgp%%04d.jpg"
. Credit for this to Mike Fitzpatrick https://superuser.com/a/344178/153054)
4
what's the difference between -r and -framerate?
– nuno_cruz
Oct 24 '12 at 20:21
1
they're the same IIRC
– rogerdpack
Feb 18 '13 at 16:34
21
No need for numbering nonsense, as long as you're happy to accept the order they appear in (say) 'ls'... just use: ffmpeg -pattern_type glob -i '*.jpg' movie.mp4
– Orwellophile
Nov 3 '13 at 5:32
2
Is there any switch to control the time gap between images,say, I'd like to show the first image 13s,the second 15s,24s for the third,time gap is user defined,is that possible?
– zionpi
Feb 26 '16 at 8:00
2
see also trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/…
– d3vid
Apr 20 '16 at 8:43
add a comment |
There is no need to rename files if using the -start_number
switch like so:
ffmpeg -start_number n -i test_%d.jpg -vcodec mpeg4 test.avi
where n
is the start of the sequence of stills.
Note, this will work as long as the sequence is unbroken once it starts. If there are gaps and you want all of the stills included, then renumbering may be necessary to fill the gaps.
There are some other switches you might find useful.
I use the following one liner to get a slower frame rate and to compress the images and have a smaller resulting video:
ffmpeg.exe -f image2 -framerate 25 -pattern_type sequence -start_number 1234
-r 3 -i Imgp%04d.jpg -s 720x480 test.avi
The -r 3
option sets the framerate of the resulting video to 3 frames per second so that I can see each still for a short period of time. The -s
option rescales the pictures to the desired resolution to manage the size of the resulting video.
(In the Windows shell, replace -i Imgp%04d.jpg
with -i "Imgp%%04d.jpg"
. Credit for this to Mike Fitzpatrick https://superuser.com/a/344178/153054)
4
what's the difference between -r and -framerate?
– nuno_cruz
Oct 24 '12 at 20:21
1
they're the same IIRC
– rogerdpack
Feb 18 '13 at 16:34
21
No need for numbering nonsense, as long as you're happy to accept the order they appear in (say) 'ls'... just use: ffmpeg -pattern_type glob -i '*.jpg' movie.mp4
– Orwellophile
Nov 3 '13 at 5:32
2
Is there any switch to control the time gap between images,say, I'd like to show the first image 13s,the second 15s,24s for the third,time gap is user defined,is that possible?
– zionpi
Feb 26 '16 at 8:00
2
see also trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/…
– d3vid
Apr 20 '16 at 8:43
add a comment |
There is no need to rename files if using the -start_number
switch like so:
ffmpeg -start_number n -i test_%d.jpg -vcodec mpeg4 test.avi
where n
is the start of the sequence of stills.
Note, this will work as long as the sequence is unbroken once it starts. If there are gaps and you want all of the stills included, then renumbering may be necessary to fill the gaps.
There are some other switches you might find useful.
I use the following one liner to get a slower frame rate and to compress the images and have a smaller resulting video:
ffmpeg.exe -f image2 -framerate 25 -pattern_type sequence -start_number 1234
-r 3 -i Imgp%04d.jpg -s 720x480 test.avi
The -r 3
option sets the framerate of the resulting video to 3 frames per second so that I can see each still for a short period of time. The -s
option rescales the pictures to the desired resolution to manage the size of the resulting video.
(In the Windows shell, replace -i Imgp%04d.jpg
with -i "Imgp%%04d.jpg"
. Credit for this to Mike Fitzpatrick https://superuser.com/a/344178/153054)
There is no need to rename files if using the -start_number
switch like so:
ffmpeg -start_number n -i test_%d.jpg -vcodec mpeg4 test.avi
where n
is the start of the sequence of stills.
Note, this will work as long as the sequence is unbroken once it starts. If there are gaps and you want all of the stills included, then renumbering may be necessary to fill the gaps.
There are some other switches you might find useful.
I use the following one liner to get a slower frame rate and to compress the images and have a smaller resulting video:
ffmpeg.exe -f image2 -framerate 25 -pattern_type sequence -start_number 1234
-r 3 -i Imgp%04d.jpg -s 720x480 test.avi
The -r 3
option sets the framerate of the resulting video to 3 frames per second so that I can see each still for a short period of time. The -s
option rescales the pictures to the desired resolution to manage the size of the resulting video.
(In the Windows shell, replace -i Imgp%04d.jpg
with -i "Imgp%%04d.jpg"
. Credit for this to Mike Fitzpatrick https://superuser.com/a/344178/153054)
edited Mar 20 '17 at 10:04
Community♦
1
1
answered Aug 28 '12 at 13:19
Assad EbrahimAssad Ebrahim
1,44111523
1,44111523
4
what's the difference between -r and -framerate?
– nuno_cruz
Oct 24 '12 at 20:21
1
they're the same IIRC
– rogerdpack
Feb 18 '13 at 16:34
21
No need for numbering nonsense, as long as you're happy to accept the order they appear in (say) 'ls'... just use: ffmpeg -pattern_type glob -i '*.jpg' movie.mp4
– Orwellophile
Nov 3 '13 at 5:32
2
Is there any switch to control the time gap between images,say, I'd like to show the first image 13s,the second 15s,24s for the third,time gap is user defined,is that possible?
– zionpi
Feb 26 '16 at 8:00
2
see also trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/…
– d3vid
Apr 20 '16 at 8:43
add a comment |
4
what's the difference between -r and -framerate?
– nuno_cruz
Oct 24 '12 at 20:21
1
they're the same IIRC
– rogerdpack
Feb 18 '13 at 16:34
21
No need for numbering nonsense, as long as you're happy to accept the order they appear in (say) 'ls'... just use: ffmpeg -pattern_type glob -i '*.jpg' movie.mp4
– Orwellophile
Nov 3 '13 at 5:32
2
Is there any switch to control the time gap between images,say, I'd like to show the first image 13s,the second 15s,24s for the third,time gap is user defined,is that possible?
– zionpi
Feb 26 '16 at 8:00
2
see also trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/…
– d3vid
Apr 20 '16 at 8:43
4
4
what's the difference between -r and -framerate?
– nuno_cruz
Oct 24 '12 at 20:21
what's the difference between -r and -framerate?
– nuno_cruz
Oct 24 '12 at 20:21
1
1
they're the same IIRC
– rogerdpack
Feb 18 '13 at 16:34
they're the same IIRC
– rogerdpack
Feb 18 '13 at 16:34
21
21
No need for numbering nonsense, as long as you're happy to accept the order they appear in (say) 'ls'... just use: ffmpeg -pattern_type glob -i '*.jpg' movie.mp4
– Orwellophile
Nov 3 '13 at 5:32
No need for numbering nonsense, as long as you're happy to accept the order they appear in (say) 'ls'... just use: ffmpeg -pattern_type glob -i '*.jpg' movie.mp4
– Orwellophile
Nov 3 '13 at 5:32
2
2
Is there any switch to control the time gap between images,say, I'd like to show the first image 13s,the second 15s,24s for the third,time gap is user defined,is that possible?
– zionpi
Feb 26 '16 at 8:00
Is there any switch to control the time gap between images,say, I'd like to show the first image 13s,the second 15s,24s for the third,time gap is user defined,is that possible?
– zionpi
Feb 26 '16 at 8:00
2
2
see also trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/…
– d3vid
Apr 20 '16 at 8:43
see also trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/…
– d3vid
Apr 20 '16 at 8:43
add a comment |
you can use this below code snippet:
cat *.jpg | ffmpeg -f image2pipe -r 1 -vcodec mjpeg -i - -vcodec libx264 out.mp4
This does not rotate JPGs to the rotation stated in metadata.
– Erik Johansson
Oct 13 '15 at 8:16
add a comment |
you can use this below code snippet:
cat *.jpg | ffmpeg -f image2pipe -r 1 -vcodec mjpeg -i - -vcodec libx264 out.mp4
This does not rotate JPGs to the rotation stated in metadata.
– Erik Johansson
Oct 13 '15 at 8:16
add a comment |
you can use this below code snippet:
cat *.jpg | ffmpeg -f image2pipe -r 1 -vcodec mjpeg -i - -vcodec libx264 out.mp4
you can use this below code snippet:
cat *.jpg | ffmpeg -f image2pipe -r 1 -vcodec mjpeg -i - -vcodec libx264 out.mp4
answered Nov 8 '12 at 14:33
kuanghaibin
This does not rotate JPGs to the rotation stated in metadata.
– Erik Johansson
Oct 13 '15 at 8:16
add a comment |
This does not rotate JPGs to the rotation stated in metadata.
– Erik Johansson
Oct 13 '15 at 8:16
This does not rotate JPGs to the rotation stated in metadata.
– Erik Johansson
Oct 13 '15 at 8:16
This does not rotate JPGs to the rotation stated in metadata.
– Erik Johansson
Oct 13 '15 at 8:16
add a comment |
You can find an example script in the ffmpeg documentation:
3.2 How do I encode single pictures into movies?
If you have large number of pictures to rename, you can use the following command to ease the burden. The command, using the bourne shell syntax, symbolically links all files in the current directory that match *jpg to the
/tmp' directory in the sequence of
img001.jpg', `img002.jpg' and so on.
x=1; for i in *jpg; do counter=$(printf %03d $x); ln "$i" /tmp/img"$counter".jpg; x=$(($x+1)); done
Then run:
ffmpeg -f image2 -i /tmp/img%03d.jpg /tmp/a.mpg
2
You'd be better making x=0 to start so the image name's start img000.jpg as this is what ffmpeg expects. Also symlinking didn't work for me as ffmpeg couldn't find the files so I had to use cp instead (obvious speed and space draw backs but I rm them after anyway). mv would also work if you don't mind losing the originals.
– RyanfaeScotland
Mar 28 '13 at 14:21
Note that in this answer, the command provided creates hardlinks, not symlinks. Regarding the use ofcp
if linking doesn't work, if your filesystem supports itcp --reflink=auto
will achieve much better speed/space usage.
– Félix Saparelli
Jun 5 '15 at 1:00
add a comment |
You can find an example script in the ffmpeg documentation:
3.2 How do I encode single pictures into movies?
If you have large number of pictures to rename, you can use the following command to ease the burden. The command, using the bourne shell syntax, symbolically links all files in the current directory that match *jpg to the
/tmp' directory in the sequence of
img001.jpg', `img002.jpg' and so on.
x=1; for i in *jpg; do counter=$(printf %03d $x); ln "$i" /tmp/img"$counter".jpg; x=$(($x+1)); done
Then run:
ffmpeg -f image2 -i /tmp/img%03d.jpg /tmp/a.mpg
2
You'd be better making x=0 to start so the image name's start img000.jpg as this is what ffmpeg expects. Also symlinking didn't work for me as ffmpeg couldn't find the files so I had to use cp instead (obvious speed and space draw backs but I rm them after anyway). mv would also work if you don't mind losing the originals.
– RyanfaeScotland
Mar 28 '13 at 14:21
Note that in this answer, the command provided creates hardlinks, not symlinks. Regarding the use ofcp
if linking doesn't work, if your filesystem supports itcp --reflink=auto
will achieve much better speed/space usage.
– Félix Saparelli
Jun 5 '15 at 1:00
add a comment |
You can find an example script in the ffmpeg documentation:
3.2 How do I encode single pictures into movies?
If you have large number of pictures to rename, you can use the following command to ease the burden. The command, using the bourne shell syntax, symbolically links all files in the current directory that match *jpg to the
/tmp' directory in the sequence of
img001.jpg', `img002.jpg' and so on.
x=1; for i in *jpg; do counter=$(printf %03d $x); ln "$i" /tmp/img"$counter".jpg; x=$(($x+1)); done
Then run:
ffmpeg -f image2 -i /tmp/img%03d.jpg /tmp/a.mpg
You can find an example script in the ffmpeg documentation:
3.2 How do I encode single pictures into movies?
If you have large number of pictures to rename, you can use the following command to ease the burden. The command, using the bourne shell syntax, symbolically links all files in the current directory that match *jpg to the
/tmp' directory in the sequence of
img001.jpg', `img002.jpg' and so on.
x=1; for i in *jpg; do counter=$(printf %03d $x); ln "$i" /tmp/img"$counter".jpg; x=$(($x+1)); done
Then run:
ffmpeg -f image2 -i /tmp/img%03d.jpg /tmp/a.mpg
answered Jul 18 '10 at 17:02
gaizkagaizka
27122
27122
2
You'd be better making x=0 to start so the image name's start img000.jpg as this is what ffmpeg expects. Also symlinking didn't work for me as ffmpeg couldn't find the files so I had to use cp instead (obvious speed and space draw backs but I rm them after anyway). mv would also work if you don't mind losing the originals.
– RyanfaeScotland
Mar 28 '13 at 14:21
Note that in this answer, the command provided creates hardlinks, not symlinks. Regarding the use ofcp
if linking doesn't work, if your filesystem supports itcp --reflink=auto
will achieve much better speed/space usage.
– Félix Saparelli
Jun 5 '15 at 1:00
add a comment |
2
You'd be better making x=0 to start so the image name's start img000.jpg as this is what ffmpeg expects. Also symlinking didn't work for me as ffmpeg couldn't find the files so I had to use cp instead (obvious speed and space draw backs but I rm them after anyway). mv would also work if you don't mind losing the originals.
– RyanfaeScotland
Mar 28 '13 at 14:21
Note that in this answer, the command provided creates hardlinks, not symlinks. Regarding the use ofcp
if linking doesn't work, if your filesystem supports itcp --reflink=auto
will achieve much better speed/space usage.
– Félix Saparelli
Jun 5 '15 at 1:00
2
2
You'd be better making x=0 to start so the image name's start img000.jpg as this is what ffmpeg expects. Also symlinking didn't work for me as ffmpeg couldn't find the files so I had to use cp instead (obvious speed and space draw backs but I rm them after anyway). mv would also work if you don't mind losing the originals.
– RyanfaeScotland
Mar 28 '13 at 14:21
You'd be better making x=0 to start so the image name's start img000.jpg as this is what ffmpeg expects. Also symlinking didn't work for me as ffmpeg couldn't find the files so I had to use cp instead (obvious speed and space draw backs but I rm them after anyway). mv would also work if you don't mind losing the originals.
– RyanfaeScotland
Mar 28 '13 at 14:21
Note that in this answer, the command provided creates hardlinks, not symlinks. Regarding the use of
cp
if linking doesn't work, if your filesystem supports it cp --reflink=auto
will achieve much better speed/space usage.– Félix Saparelli
Jun 5 '15 at 1:00
Note that in this answer, the command provided creates hardlinks, not symlinks. Regarding the use of
cp
if linking doesn't work, if your filesystem supports it cp --reflink=auto
will achieve much better speed/space usage.– Félix Saparelli
Jun 5 '15 at 1:00
add a comment |
From ffmpeg's docs:
Using a glob pattern
ffmpeg also supports bash-style globbing (* represents any number of any characters).
This is useful if your images are sequential but not necessarily in a numerically sequential order as in the previous examples.
ffmpeg -r 1 -pattern_type glob -i 'test_*.jpg' -c:v libx264 out.mp4
So, as long as your files are sorted, using the -pattern_type glob
switch should work for you.
Note that this glob is more limited than regular shell globs: trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/3620 apparently because image type is deduced from the extension.
– Ciro Santilli 新疆改造中心 六四事件 法轮功
Dec 17 '16 at 17:02
add a comment |
From ffmpeg's docs:
Using a glob pattern
ffmpeg also supports bash-style globbing (* represents any number of any characters).
This is useful if your images are sequential but not necessarily in a numerically sequential order as in the previous examples.
ffmpeg -r 1 -pattern_type glob -i 'test_*.jpg' -c:v libx264 out.mp4
So, as long as your files are sorted, using the -pattern_type glob
switch should work for you.
Note that this glob is more limited than regular shell globs: trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/3620 apparently because image type is deduced from the extension.
– Ciro Santilli 新疆改造中心 六四事件 法轮功
Dec 17 '16 at 17:02
add a comment |
From ffmpeg's docs:
Using a glob pattern
ffmpeg also supports bash-style globbing (* represents any number of any characters).
This is useful if your images are sequential but not necessarily in a numerically sequential order as in the previous examples.
ffmpeg -r 1 -pattern_type glob -i 'test_*.jpg' -c:v libx264 out.mp4
So, as long as your files are sorted, using the -pattern_type glob
switch should work for you.
From ffmpeg's docs:
Using a glob pattern
ffmpeg also supports bash-style globbing (* represents any number of any characters).
This is useful if your images are sequential but not necessarily in a numerically sequential order as in the previous examples.
ffmpeg -r 1 -pattern_type glob -i 'test_*.jpg' -c:v libx264 out.mp4
So, as long as your files are sorted, using the -pattern_type glob
switch should work for you.
answered Jul 13 '14 at 7:11
Nevin WilliamsNevin Williams
3,3951229
3,3951229
Note that this glob is more limited than regular shell globs: trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/3620 apparently because image type is deduced from the extension.
– Ciro Santilli 新疆改造中心 六四事件 法轮功
Dec 17 '16 at 17:02
add a comment |
Note that this glob is more limited than regular shell globs: trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/3620 apparently because image type is deduced from the extension.
– Ciro Santilli 新疆改造中心 六四事件 法轮功
Dec 17 '16 at 17:02
Note that this glob is more limited than regular shell globs: trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/3620 apparently because image type is deduced from the extension.
– Ciro Santilli 新疆改造中心 六四事件 法轮功
Dec 17 '16 at 17:02
Note that this glob is more limited than regular shell globs: trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/3620 apparently because image type is deduced from the extension.
– Ciro Santilli 新疆改造中心 六四事件 法轮功
Dec 17 '16 at 17:02
add a comment |
As far as I know, you cannot start the sequence in random numbers (I don't remember if you should start it at 0 or 1), plus, it cannot have gaps, if it does, ffmpeg will assume the sequence is over and stop adding more images.
Also, as stated in the comments to my answer, remember you need to specify the width of your index. Like:
image%03d.jpg
And if you use a %03d index type, you need to pad your filenames with 0, like :
image001.jpg
image002.jpg
image003.jpg
etc.
1
If the image file names have leading zeros then the format string must also specify the width like "%03d".
– Hudson
May 13 '10 at 18:17
1
If that's the only obstacle, you could just write a script to either rename or symlink your images to a properly reindexed set.
– Cascabel
May 13 '10 at 18:18
1
Yes, I've worked with this before, I wrote a wrapper in Ruby a while ago where you called instance.addImage(), then instance.processVideo() and it would create a temporal directory, copy/rename the images with proper indices and create the video. It is quite easy.
– Francisco Soto
May 13 '10 at 18:25
@Jefromi I have created a symlink but how do I give the path of the symlink file to ffmpeg? It just assumes the symlink file is the image I am trying to convert? I'm on win7 btw
– Jared Glass
Apr 12 '12 at 16:13
The sequence can start anywhere from 0 to 4 inclusive.
– Assad Ebrahim
Aug 28 '12 at 12:11
add a comment |
As far as I know, you cannot start the sequence in random numbers (I don't remember if you should start it at 0 or 1), plus, it cannot have gaps, if it does, ffmpeg will assume the sequence is over and stop adding more images.
Also, as stated in the comments to my answer, remember you need to specify the width of your index. Like:
image%03d.jpg
And if you use a %03d index type, you need to pad your filenames with 0, like :
image001.jpg
image002.jpg
image003.jpg
etc.
1
If the image file names have leading zeros then the format string must also specify the width like "%03d".
– Hudson
May 13 '10 at 18:17
1
If that's the only obstacle, you could just write a script to either rename or symlink your images to a properly reindexed set.
– Cascabel
May 13 '10 at 18:18
1
Yes, I've worked with this before, I wrote a wrapper in Ruby a while ago where you called instance.addImage(), then instance.processVideo() and it would create a temporal directory, copy/rename the images with proper indices and create the video. It is quite easy.
– Francisco Soto
May 13 '10 at 18:25
@Jefromi I have created a symlink but how do I give the path of the symlink file to ffmpeg? It just assumes the symlink file is the image I am trying to convert? I'm on win7 btw
– Jared Glass
Apr 12 '12 at 16:13
The sequence can start anywhere from 0 to 4 inclusive.
– Assad Ebrahim
Aug 28 '12 at 12:11
add a comment |
As far as I know, you cannot start the sequence in random numbers (I don't remember if you should start it at 0 or 1), plus, it cannot have gaps, if it does, ffmpeg will assume the sequence is over and stop adding more images.
Also, as stated in the comments to my answer, remember you need to specify the width of your index. Like:
image%03d.jpg
And if you use a %03d index type, you need to pad your filenames with 0, like :
image001.jpg
image002.jpg
image003.jpg
etc.
As far as I know, you cannot start the sequence in random numbers (I don't remember if you should start it at 0 or 1), plus, it cannot have gaps, if it does, ffmpeg will assume the sequence is over and stop adding more images.
Also, as stated in the comments to my answer, remember you need to specify the width of your index. Like:
image%03d.jpg
And if you use a %03d index type, you need to pad your filenames with 0, like :
image001.jpg
image002.jpg
image003.jpg
etc.
answered May 13 '10 at 18:15
Francisco SotoFrancisco Soto
22713
22713
1
If the image file names have leading zeros then the format string must also specify the width like "%03d".
– Hudson
May 13 '10 at 18:17
1
If that's the only obstacle, you could just write a script to either rename or symlink your images to a properly reindexed set.
– Cascabel
May 13 '10 at 18:18
1
Yes, I've worked with this before, I wrote a wrapper in Ruby a while ago where you called instance.addImage(), then instance.processVideo() and it would create a temporal directory, copy/rename the images with proper indices and create the video. It is quite easy.
– Francisco Soto
May 13 '10 at 18:25
@Jefromi I have created a symlink but how do I give the path of the symlink file to ffmpeg? It just assumes the symlink file is the image I am trying to convert? I'm on win7 btw
– Jared Glass
Apr 12 '12 at 16:13
The sequence can start anywhere from 0 to 4 inclusive.
– Assad Ebrahim
Aug 28 '12 at 12:11
add a comment |
1
If the image file names have leading zeros then the format string must also specify the width like "%03d".
– Hudson
May 13 '10 at 18:17
1
If that's the only obstacle, you could just write a script to either rename or symlink your images to a properly reindexed set.
– Cascabel
May 13 '10 at 18:18
1
Yes, I've worked with this before, I wrote a wrapper in Ruby a while ago where you called instance.addImage(), then instance.processVideo() and it would create a temporal directory, copy/rename the images with proper indices and create the video. It is quite easy.
– Francisco Soto
May 13 '10 at 18:25
@Jefromi I have created a symlink but how do I give the path of the symlink file to ffmpeg? It just assumes the symlink file is the image I am trying to convert? I'm on win7 btw
– Jared Glass
Apr 12 '12 at 16:13
The sequence can start anywhere from 0 to 4 inclusive.
– Assad Ebrahim
Aug 28 '12 at 12:11
1
1
If the image file names have leading zeros then the format string must also specify the width like "%03d".
– Hudson
May 13 '10 at 18:17
If the image file names have leading zeros then the format string must also specify the width like "%03d".
– Hudson
May 13 '10 at 18:17
1
1
If that's the only obstacle, you could just write a script to either rename or symlink your images to a properly reindexed set.
– Cascabel
May 13 '10 at 18:18
If that's the only obstacle, you could just write a script to either rename or symlink your images to a properly reindexed set.
– Cascabel
May 13 '10 at 18:18
1
1
Yes, I've worked with this before, I wrote a wrapper in Ruby a while ago where you called instance.addImage(), then instance.processVideo() and it would create a temporal directory, copy/rename the images with proper indices and create the video. It is quite easy.
– Francisco Soto
May 13 '10 at 18:25
Yes, I've worked with this before, I wrote a wrapper in Ruby a while ago where you called instance.addImage(), then instance.processVideo() and it would create a temporal directory, copy/rename the images with proper indices and create the video. It is quite easy.
– Francisco Soto
May 13 '10 at 18:25
@Jefromi I have created a symlink but how do I give the path of the symlink file to ffmpeg? It just assumes the symlink file is the image I am trying to convert? I'm on win7 btw
– Jared Glass
Apr 12 '12 at 16:13
@Jefromi I have created a symlink but how do I give the path of the symlink file to ffmpeg? It just assumes the symlink file is the image I am trying to convert? I'm on win7 btw
– Jared Glass
Apr 12 '12 at 16:13
The sequence can start anywhere from 0 to 4 inclusive.
– Assad Ebrahim
Aug 28 '12 at 12:11
The sequence can start anywhere from 0 to 4 inclusive.
– Assad Ebrahim
Aug 28 '12 at 12:11
add a comment |
I agree with Francisco, but as a workaround you could just write a quick script to move or create symbolic links to the files with the sequence numbers that ffmpeg needs. The script could then call ffmpeg and then remove the links or move the files back to their original locations.
add a comment |
I agree with Francisco, but as a workaround you could just write a quick script to move or create symbolic links to the files with the sequence numbers that ffmpeg needs. The script could then call ffmpeg and then remove the links or move the files back to their original locations.
add a comment |
I agree with Francisco, but as a workaround you could just write a quick script to move or create symbolic links to the files with the sequence numbers that ffmpeg needs. The script could then call ffmpeg and then remove the links or move the files back to their original locations.
I agree with Francisco, but as a workaround you could just write a quick script to move or create symbolic links to the files with the sequence numbers that ffmpeg needs. The script could then call ffmpeg and then remove the links or move the files back to their original locations.
answered May 13 '10 at 18:23
Jason BJason B
1513
1513
add a comment |
add a comment |
look up
x=1; for i in *jpg; do counter=$(printf %03d $x); ln "$i"
/tmp/img"$counter".jpg; x=$(($x+1)); done
add a comment |
look up
x=1; for i in *jpg; do counter=$(printf %03d $x); ln "$i"
/tmp/img"$counter".jpg; x=$(($x+1)); done
add a comment |
look up
x=1; for i in *jpg; do counter=$(printf %03d $x); ln "$i"
/tmp/img"$counter".jpg; x=$(($x+1)); done
look up
x=1; for i in *jpg; do counter=$(printf %03d $x); ln "$i"
/tmp/img"$counter".jpg; x=$(($x+1)); done
answered Aug 14 '11 at 21:09
owcc
add a comment |
add a comment |
I used the flv encoder since my video was going in a flash player (Jwplayer)
ffmpeg -i %d.jpg -vcodec flv test.flv
add a comment |
I used the flv encoder since my video was going in a flash player (Jwplayer)
ffmpeg -i %d.jpg -vcodec flv test.flv
add a comment |
I used the flv encoder since my video was going in a flash player (Jwplayer)
ffmpeg -i %d.jpg -vcodec flv test.flv
I used the flv encoder since my video was going in a flash player (Jwplayer)
ffmpeg -i %d.jpg -vcodec flv test.flv
answered Nov 11 '11 at 18:04
nick phillips
add a comment |
add a comment |
From the documentation, it seems you can simply use *
For example, for creating a video from filenames matching the glob pattern foo-*.jpeg:
ffmpeg -f image2 -pattern_type glob -framerate 12 -i 'foo-*.jpeg' -s WxH foo.avi
As a note, to improve affect the quality, the rate/fps might be important (eg, first specifying very low/high frame rate and then pass from a second filter that will make the slow motion video to normal?)
add a comment |
From the documentation, it seems you can simply use *
For example, for creating a video from filenames matching the glob pattern foo-*.jpeg:
ffmpeg -f image2 -pattern_type glob -framerate 12 -i 'foo-*.jpeg' -s WxH foo.avi
As a note, to improve affect the quality, the rate/fps might be important (eg, first specifying very low/high frame rate and then pass from a second filter that will make the slow motion video to normal?)
add a comment |
From the documentation, it seems you can simply use *
For example, for creating a video from filenames matching the glob pattern foo-*.jpeg:
ffmpeg -f image2 -pattern_type glob -framerate 12 -i 'foo-*.jpeg' -s WxH foo.avi
As a note, to improve affect the quality, the rate/fps might be important (eg, first specifying very low/high frame rate and then pass from a second filter that will make the slow motion video to normal?)
From the documentation, it seems you can simply use *
For example, for creating a video from filenames matching the glob pattern foo-*.jpeg:
ffmpeg -f image2 -pattern_type glob -framerate 12 -i 'foo-*.jpeg' -s WxH foo.avi
As a note, to improve affect the quality, the rate/fps might be important (eg, first specifying very low/high frame rate and then pass from a second filter that will make the slow motion video to normal?)
answered Jan 29 '16 at 12:05
ntgntg
1928
1928
add a comment |
add a comment |
I know this is an old question but I came across it in Google while looking for the same answer. None of the answers here satisfied me completely so I did more searching and reading and this is a command that I came up with for my own problem.
cat {0032..1501}*.png | ffmpeg -f image2pipe -framerate 5 -i - -s 720x480 test2.avi
The reason why i'd use a command like this is...
- Cat and -f image2pipe give you finer control over what images you
use. For example it allows you to use bash features like bracket
expansion and other commands like grep to fine-tune your results
should you choose. - Fewer switches to remember.
- I recommend NOT using -r, and just use -framerate instead. In my
experience -r tends to drop frames more often. - Less complex, no unnecessary switches in use and it will work as-is.
You may add more complexity (for example, specifying encoder) and
fine tune to suit your needs.
For the OP's question,-start_number
is all that's needed.
– Gyan
Aug 4 '16 at 5:29
add a comment |
I know this is an old question but I came across it in Google while looking for the same answer. None of the answers here satisfied me completely so I did more searching and reading and this is a command that I came up with for my own problem.
cat {0032..1501}*.png | ffmpeg -f image2pipe -framerate 5 -i - -s 720x480 test2.avi
The reason why i'd use a command like this is...
- Cat and -f image2pipe give you finer control over what images you
use. For example it allows you to use bash features like bracket
expansion and other commands like grep to fine-tune your results
should you choose. - Fewer switches to remember.
- I recommend NOT using -r, and just use -framerate instead. In my
experience -r tends to drop frames more often. - Less complex, no unnecessary switches in use and it will work as-is.
You may add more complexity (for example, specifying encoder) and
fine tune to suit your needs.
For the OP's question,-start_number
is all that's needed.
– Gyan
Aug 4 '16 at 5:29
add a comment |
I know this is an old question but I came across it in Google while looking for the same answer. None of the answers here satisfied me completely so I did more searching and reading and this is a command that I came up with for my own problem.
cat {0032..1501}*.png | ffmpeg -f image2pipe -framerate 5 -i - -s 720x480 test2.avi
The reason why i'd use a command like this is...
- Cat and -f image2pipe give you finer control over what images you
use. For example it allows you to use bash features like bracket
expansion and other commands like grep to fine-tune your results
should you choose. - Fewer switches to remember.
- I recommend NOT using -r, and just use -framerate instead. In my
experience -r tends to drop frames more often. - Less complex, no unnecessary switches in use and it will work as-is.
You may add more complexity (for example, specifying encoder) and
fine tune to suit your needs.
I know this is an old question but I came across it in Google while looking for the same answer. None of the answers here satisfied me completely so I did more searching and reading and this is a command that I came up with for my own problem.
cat {0032..1501}*.png | ffmpeg -f image2pipe -framerate 5 -i - -s 720x480 test2.avi
The reason why i'd use a command like this is...
- Cat and -f image2pipe give you finer control over what images you
use. For example it allows you to use bash features like bracket
expansion and other commands like grep to fine-tune your results
should you choose. - Fewer switches to remember.
- I recommend NOT using -r, and just use -framerate instead. In my
experience -r tends to drop frames more often. - Less complex, no unnecessary switches in use and it will work as-is.
You may add more complexity (for example, specifying encoder) and
fine tune to suit your needs.
answered Aug 3 '16 at 23:44
David BobbDavid Bobb
11
11
For the OP's question,-start_number
is all that's needed.
– Gyan
Aug 4 '16 at 5:29
add a comment |
For the OP's question,-start_number
is all that's needed.
– Gyan
Aug 4 '16 at 5:29
For the OP's question,
-start_number
is all that's needed.– Gyan
Aug 4 '16 at 5:29
For the OP's question,
-start_number
is all that's needed.– Gyan
Aug 4 '16 at 5:29
add a comment |
In my case, it was a little trickier because of the numbers in the files. Here's how my images look like:
$ ls | head -5
2014_aq_unprocessed 001.jpg
2014_aq_unprocessed 002.jpg
2014_aq_unprocessed 003.jpg
2014_aq_unprocessed 004.jpg
2014_aq_unprocessed 005.jpg
and here's the command I used:
ffmpeg -i 2014_aq_unprocessed %3d.jpg -vcodec mpeg4 test.avi
add a comment |
In my case, it was a little trickier because of the numbers in the files. Here's how my images look like:
$ ls | head -5
2014_aq_unprocessed 001.jpg
2014_aq_unprocessed 002.jpg
2014_aq_unprocessed 003.jpg
2014_aq_unprocessed 004.jpg
2014_aq_unprocessed 005.jpg
and here's the command I used:
ffmpeg -i 2014_aq_unprocessed %3d.jpg -vcodec mpeg4 test.avi
add a comment |
In my case, it was a little trickier because of the numbers in the files. Here's how my images look like:
$ ls | head -5
2014_aq_unprocessed 001.jpg
2014_aq_unprocessed 002.jpg
2014_aq_unprocessed 003.jpg
2014_aq_unprocessed 004.jpg
2014_aq_unprocessed 005.jpg
and here's the command I used:
ffmpeg -i 2014_aq_unprocessed %3d.jpg -vcodec mpeg4 test.avi
In my case, it was a little trickier because of the numbers in the files. Here's how my images look like:
$ ls | head -5
2014_aq_unprocessed 001.jpg
2014_aq_unprocessed 002.jpg
2014_aq_unprocessed 003.jpg
2014_aq_unprocessed 004.jpg
2014_aq_unprocessed 005.jpg
and here's the command I used:
ffmpeg -i 2014_aq_unprocessed %3d.jpg -vcodec mpeg4 test.avi
answered Oct 30 '17 at 18:28
Mona JalalMona Jalal
169514
169514
add a comment |
add a comment |
You can do this with convert -morph
:
convert *.jpg -delay 10 -morph 10 %05d.jpg
If you want to use ffmpeg
, I used
ffmpeg -pattern_type glob -i '*.jpg' -vf "setpts=10*PTS" movie.mp4
where the 10*PTS
tells ffmpeg to slow it down 10 times. You can also have fractions there to speed it up.
This is just interpolating your original image sequence to a new space, it doesn't create a video file like the OP asked.
– f0ster
Mar 18 '16 at 17:13
add a comment |
You can do this with convert -morph
:
convert *.jpg -delay 10 -morph 10 %05d.jpg
If you want to use ffmpeg
, I used
ffmpeg -pattern_type glob -i '*.jpg' -vf "setpts=10*PTS" movie.mp4
where the 10*PTS
tells ffmpeg to slow it down 10 times. You can also have fractions there to speed it up.
This is just interpolating your original image sequence to a new space, it doesn't create a video file like the OP asked.
– f0ster
Mar 18 '16 at 17:13
add a comment |
You can do this with convert -morph
:
convert *.jpg -delay 10 -morph 10 %05d.jpg
If you want to use ffmpeg
, I used
ffmpeg -pattern_type glob -i '*.jpg' -vf "setpts=10*PTS" movie.mp4
where the 10*PTS
tells ffmpeg to slow it down 10 times. You can also have fractions there to speed it up.
You can do this with convert -morph
:
convert *.jpg -delay 10 -morph 10 %05d.jpg
If you want to use ffmpeg
, I used
ffmpeg -pattern_type glob -i '*.jpg' -vf "setpts=10*PTS" movie.mp4
where the 10*PTS
tells ffmpeg to slow it down 10 times. You can also have fractions there to speed it up.
edited Jan 22 at 15:27
answered Jan 14 '16 at 23:22
Martin ThomaMartin Thoma
1,50182348
1,50182348
This is just interpolating your original image sequence to a new space, it doesn't create a video file like the OP asked.
– f0ster
Mar 18 '16 at 17:13
add a comment |
This is just interpolating your original image sequence to a new space, it doesn't create a video file like the OP asked.
– f0ster
Mar 18 '16 at 17:13
This is just interpolating your original image sequence to a new space, it doesn't create a video file like the OP asked.
– f0ster
Mar 18 '16 at 17:13
This is just interpolating your original image sequence to a new space, it doesn't create a video file like the OP asked.
– f0ster
Mar 18 '16 at 17:13
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f624567%2fhow-to-create-a-video-from-images-using-ffmpeg%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
It's been a while since you asked this, but if you're still interested in the question, the answer is YES -- I've posted the details and an example below: stackoverflow.com/a/12160155/181638
– Assad Ebrahim
Aug 28 '12 at 13:20
@casperOne would be useful to have an idea why this is off topic. It seems like a specific programming problem. The FFmpeg tag has 3.7k followers, and with 27k views clearly people find it useful..
– geotheory
May 20 '13 at 10:36
2
@geotheory The tag stats are irrelevant. ffmpeg is a program much in the way of say, WinRar. While you can program against the libraries in ffmpeg, this question is not about that. Using ffmpeg from the command line is to be asked on Super User, where it's on topic.
– casperOne
May 20 '13 at 11:45