Extracting all-caps variables from string expressions
$begingroup$
I'm extracting variables from user entered mathematical expressions, so that I can enter them into the expression evaluator exprtk. For now, the condition is given that variable names will be composed of consecutive capital letters. Any mathematical constants or function names will be lowercase. Some hypothetical inputs and expected outputs:
Input: "(A + B) - 2"
Expected Output: { A, B }
Input: "pow(AC,E) * ( E * F )"
Expected Output: { AC, E, F }
The code I have right now seems to work, but I would love a critique. I add a space to the end of the string to make my algorithm catch cases at the end of the string, which seems a bit hacky(?).
template<class T>
std::vector<std::string> MapEvaluator<T>::extractVariables(std::string expression) {
expression = expression + " ";
std::vector<std::string> variables = {};
std::string substring;
size_t consecutiveCharsCaps = 0;
bool previousCharCaps = false;
for (size_t i = 0; i < expression.length(); i++)
{
if (isCapital(expression[i]))
{
consecutiveCharsCaps++;
previousCharCaps = true;
}
else {
if(previousCharCaps) {
substring = expression.substr(i - consecutiveCharsCaps, consecutiveCharsCaps);
variables.push_back(substring);
consecutiveCharsCaps = 0;
previousCharCaps = false;
}
}
}
unique(variables);
return variables;
}
template <class T>
void MapEvaluator<T>::unique(std::vector<std::string> &vec)
{
auto end = vec.end();
for (auto it = vec.begin(); it != end; ++it) {
end = std::remove(it + 1, end, *it);
}
vec.erase(end, vec.end());
}
template<class T>
bool MapEvaluator<T>::isCapital(char c) {
return (c >='A' && c <= 'Z');
}
c++ algorithm strings
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm extracting variables from user entered mathematical expressions, so that I can enter them into the expression evaluator exprtk. For now, the condition is given that variable names will be composed of consecutive capital letters. Any mathematical constants or function names will be lowercase. Some hypothetical inputs and expected outputs:
Input: "(A + B) - 2"
Expected Output: { A, B }
Input: "pow(AC,E) * ( E * F )"
Expected Output: { AC, E, F }
The code I have right now seems to work, but I would love a critique. I add a space to the end of the string to make my algorithm catch cases at the end of the string, which seems a bit hacky(?).
template<class T>
std::vector<std::string> MapEvaluator<T>::extractVariables(std::string expression) {
expression = expression + " ";
std::vector<std::string> variables = {};
std::string substring;
size_t consecutiveCharsCaps = 0;
bool previousCharCaps = false;
for (size_t i = 0; i < expression.length(); i++)
{
if (isCapital(expression[i]))
{
consecutiveCharsCaps++;
previousCharCaps = true;
}
else {
if(previousCharCaps) {
substring = expression.substr(i - consecutiveCharsCaps, consecutiveCharsCaps);
variables.push_back(substring);
consecutiveCharsCaps = 0;
previousCharCaps = false;
}
}
}
unique(variables);
return variables;
}
template <class T>
void MapEvaluator<T>::unique(std::vector<std::string> &vec)
{
auto end = vec.end();
for (auto it = vec.begin(); it != end; ++it) {
end = std::remove(it + 1, end, *it);
}
vec.erase(end, vec.end());
}
template<class T>
bool MapEvaluator<T>::isCapital(char c) {
return (c >='A' && c <= 'Z');
}
c++ algorithm strings
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm extracting variables from user entered mathematical expressions, so that I can enter them into the expression evaluator exprtk. For now, the condition is given that variable names will be composed of consecutive capital letters. Any mathematical constants or function names will be lowercase. Some hypothetical inputs and expected outputs:
Input: "(A + B) - 2"
Expected Output: { A, B }
Input: "pow(AC,E) * ( E * F )"
Expected Output: { AC, E, F }
The code I have right now seems to work, but I would love a critique. I add a space to the end of the string to make my algorithm catch cases at the end of the string, which seems a bit hacky(?).
template<class T>
std::vector<std::string> MapEvaluator<T>::extractVariables(std::string expression) {
expression = expression + " ";
std::vector<std::string> variables = {};
std::string substring;
size_t consecutiveCharsCaps = 0;
bool previousCharCaps = false;
for (size_t i = 0; i < expression.length(); i++)
{
if (isCapital(expression[i]))
{
consecutiveCharsCaps++;
previousCharCaps = true;
}
else {
if(previousCharCaps) {
substring = expression.substr(i - consecutiveCharsCaps, consecutiveCharsCaps);
variables.push_back(substring);
consecutiveCharsCaps = 0;
previousCharCaps = false;
}
}
}
unique(variables);
return variables;
}
template <class T>
void MapEvaluator<T>::unique(std::vector<std::string> &vec)
{
auto end = vec.end();
for (auto it = vec.begin(); it != end; ++it) {
end = std::remove(it + 1, end, *it);
}
vec.erase(end, vec.end());
}
template<class T>
bool MapEvaluator<T>::isCapital(char c) {
return (c >='A' && c <= 'Z');
}
c++ algorithm strings
$endgroup$
I'm extracting variables from user entered mathematical expressions, so that I can enter them into the expression evaluator exprtk. For now, the condition is given that variable names will be composed of consecutive capital letters. Any mathematical constants or function names will be lowercase. Some hypothetical inputs and expected outputs:
Input: "(A + B) - 2"
Expected Output: { A, B }
Input: "pow(AC,E) * ( E * F )"
Expected Output: { AC, E, F }
The code I have right now seems to work, but I would love a critique. I add a space to the end of the string to make my algorithm catch cases at the end of the string, which seems a bit hacky(?).
template<class T>
std::vector<std::string> MapEvaluator<T>::extractVariables(std::string expression) {
expression = expression + " ";
std::vector<std::string> variables = {};
std::string substring;
size_t consecutiveCharsCaps = 0;
bool previousCharCaps = false;
for (size_t i = 0; i < expression.length(); i++)
{
if (isCapital(expression[i]))
{
consecutiveCharsCaps++;
previousCharCaps = true;
}
else {
if(previousCharCaps) {
substring = expression.substr(i - consecutiveCharsCaps, consecutiveCharsCaps);
variables.push_back(substring);
consecutiveCharsCaps = 0;
previousCharCaps = false;
}
}
}
unique(variables);
return variables;
}
template <class T>
void MapEvaluator<T>::unique(std::vector<std::string> &vec)
{
auto end = vec.end();
for (auto it = vec.begin(); it != end; ++it) {
end = std::remove(it + 1, end, *it);
}
vec.erase(end, vec.end());
}
template<class T>
bool MapEvaluator<T>::isCapital(char c) {
return (c >='A' && c <= 'Z');
}
c++ algorithm strings
c++ algorithm strings
edited 4 mins ago
Jamal♦
30.4k11121227
30.4k11121227
asked 7 hours ago
YosemiteYosemite
405
405
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Some observations:
It seems that
std::adjacent_find
essentially already does what you want, which is extracting all continuous sub-strings consisting of uppercase letters.Removing duplicates from a vector might be fine, but you can also avoid this completely by inserting the found elements into a
std::set
. I suspect that the number of unique variables is always small, so this is a cleaner approach.There is no reason for
isCapital
to be a member function. Instead, it should be a free function. Remember that interfaces should be complete but minimal. But in fact, there's no reason for the function in the first place: the standard already hasstd::isupper
that we should rather use.
So with these in mind, we can re-write your function to e.g.,:
std::vector<std::string> get_variables(const std::string& str)
{
std::set<std::string> vars;
for (auto first = str.cbegin(); first != str.cend(); )
{
auto var_end = std::adjacent_find(first, str.cend(),
(char a, char b) { return std::isupper(a) != std::isupper(b); });
if (var_end != str.cend())
{
++var_end;
}
if (is_capital(*first))
{
vars.insert(std::string(first, var_end));
}
first = var_end;
}
return std::vector<std::string>(vars.cbegin(), vars.cend());
}
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "196"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f215793%2fextracting-all-caps-variables-from-string-expressions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Some observations:
It seems that
std::adjacent_find
essentially already does what you want, which is extracting all continuous sub-strings consisting of uppercase letters.Removing duplicates from a vector might be fine, but you can also avoid this completely by inserting the found elements into a
std::set
. I suspect that the number of unique variables is always small, so this is a cleaner approach.There is no reason for
isCapital
to be a member function. Instead, it should be a free function. Remember that interfaces should be complete but minimal. But in fact, there's no reason for the function in the first place: the standard already hasstd::isupper
that we should rather use.
So with these in mind, we can re-write your function to e.g.,:
std::vector<std::string> get_variables(const std::string& str)
{
std::set<std::string> vars;
for (auto first = str.cbegin(); first != str.cend(); )
{
auto var_end = std::adjacent_find(first, str.cend(),
(char a, char b) { return std::isupper(a) != std::isupper(b); });
if (var_end != str.cend())
{
++var_end;
}
if (is_capital(*first))
{
vars.insert(std::string(first, var_end));
}
first = var_end;
}
return std::vector<std::string>(vars.cbegin(), vars.cend());
}
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Some observations:
It seems that
std::adjacent_find
essentially already does what you want, which is extracting all continuous sub-strings consisting of uppercase letters.Removing duplicates from a vector might be fine, but you can also avoid this completely by inserting the found elements into a
std::set
. I suspect that the number of unique variables is always small, so this is a cleaner approach.There is no reason for
isCapital
to be a member function. Instead, it should be a free function. Remember that interfaces should be complete but minimal. But in fact, there's no reason for the function in the first place: the standard already hasstd::isupper
that we should rather use.
So with these in mind, we can re-write your function to e.g.,:
std::vector<std::string> get_variables(const std::string& str)
{
std::set<std::string> vars;
for (auto first = str.cbegin(); first != str.cend(); )
{
auto var_end = std::adjacent_find(first, str.cend(),
(char a, char b) { return std::isupper(a) != std::isupper(b); });
if (var_end != str.cend())
{
++var_end;
}
if (is_capital(*first))
{
vars.insert(std::string(first, var_end));
}
first = var_end;
}
return std::vector<std::string>(vars.cbegin(), vars.cend());
}
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Some observations:
It seems that
std::adjacent_find
essentially already does what you want, which is extracting all continuous sub-strings consisting of uppercase letters.Removing duplicates from a vector might be fine, but you can also avoid this completely by inserting the found elements into a
std::set
. I suspect that the number of unique variables is always small, so this is a cleaner approach.There is no reason for
isCapital
to be a member function. Instead, it should be a free function. Remember that interfaces should be complete but minimal. But in fact, there's no reason for the function in the first place: the standard already hasstd::isupper
that we should rather use.
So with these in mind, we can re-write your function to e.g.,:
std::vector<std::string> get_variables(const std::string& str)
{
std::set<std::string> vars;
for (auto first = str.cbegin(); first != str.cend(); )
{
auto var_end = std::adjacent_find(first, str.cend(),
(char a, char b) { return std::isupper(a) != std::isupper(b); });
if (var_end != str.cend())
{
++var_end;
}
if (is_capital(*first))
{
vars.insert(std::string(first, var_end));
}
first = var_end;
}
return std::vector<std::string>(vars.cbegin(), vars.cend());
}
$endgroup$
Some observations:
It seems that
std::adjacent_find
essentially already does what you want, which is extracting all continuous sub-strings consisting of uppercase letters.Removing duplicates from a vector might be fine, but you can also avoid this completely by inserting the found elements into a
std::set
. I suspect that the number of unique variables is always small, so this is a cleaner approach.There is no reason for
isCapital
to be a member function. Instead, it should be a free function. Remember that interfaces should be complete but minimal. But in fact, there's no reason for the function in the first place: the standard already hasstd::isupper
that we should rather use.
So with these in mind, we can re-write your function to e.g.,:
std::vector<std::string> get_variables(const std::string& str)
{
std::set<std::string> vars;
for (auto first = str.cbegin(); first != str.cend(); )
{
auto var_end = std::adjacent_find(first, str.cend(),
(char a, char b) { return std::isupper(a) != std::isupper(b); });
if (var_end != str.cend())
{
++var_end;
}
if (is_capital(*first))
{
vars.insert(std::string(first, var_end));
}
first = var_end;
}
return std::vector<std::string>(vars.cbegin(), vars.cend());
}
answered 6 hours ago
JuhoJuho
1,266410
1,266410
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f215793%2fextracting-all-caps-variables-from-string-expressions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown