Private DNS - Global Resolution
up vote
-1
down vote
favorite
I understand that it's a reasonably simple matter to place Bind9 on one of my servers and use that to resolve requests for subdomains on my network.
However, is it possible to install Bind9 on one of my servers and then use it to resolve the greater internet at large? I do understand that it will have to query up the DNS chain to achieve this.
dns ubuntu-server
add a comment |
up vote
-1
down vote
favorite
I understand that it's a reasonably simple matter to place Bind9 on one of my servers and use that to resolve requests for subdomains on my network.
However, is it possible to install Bind9 on one of my servers and then use it to resolve the greater internet at large? I do understand that it will have to query up the DNS chain to achieve this.
dns ubuntu-server
add a comment |
up vote
-1
down vote
favorite
up vote
-1
down vote
favorite
I understand that it's a reasonably simple matter to place Bind9 on one of my servers and use that to resolve requests for subdomains on my network.
However, is it possible to install Bind9 on one of my servers and then use it to resolve the greater internet at large? I do understand that it will have to query up the DNS chain to achieve this.
dns ubuntu-server
I understand that it's a reasonably simple matter to place Bind9 on one of my servers and use that to resolve requests for subdomains on my network.
However, is it possible to install Bind9 on one of my servers and then use it to resolve the greater internet at large? I do understand that it will have to query up the DNS chain to achieve this.
dns ubuntu-server
dns ubuntu-server
asked Nov 27 at 11:45
Persistence
219414
219414
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Yes. That's how public and ISP-provided resolvers already work. (Although some are perhaps more likely to be running Unbound or PowerDNS instead of Bind9.)
There is no querying "up" the DNS chain in this situation. If you don't configure any upstreams (forwarders), Bind9 will start directly at the root zone (using its built-in list of root servers) and will itself do the chasing of referrals/delegations (NS records).
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "3"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1378735%2fprivate-dns-global-resolution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Yes. That's how public and ISP-provided resolvers already work. (Although some are perhaps more likely to be running Unbound or PowerDNS instead of Bind9.)
There is no querying "up" the DNS chain in this situation. If you don't configure any upstreams (forwarders), Bind9 will start directly at the root zone (using its built-in list of root servers) and will itself do the chasing of referrals/delegations (NS records).
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Yes. That's how public and ISP-provided resolvers already work. (Although some are perhaps more likely to be running Unbound or PowerDNS instead of Bind9.)
There is no querying "up" the DNS chain in this situation. If you don't configure any upstreams (forwarders), Bind9 will start directly at the root zone (using its built-in list of root servers) and will itself do the chasing of referrals/delegations (NS records).
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Yes. That's how public and ISP-provided resolvers already work. (Although some are perhaps more likely to be running Unbound or PowerDNS instead of Bind9.)
There is no querying "up" the DNS chain in this situation. If you don't configure any upstreams (forwarders), Bind9 will start directly at the root zone (using its built-in list of root servers) and will itself do the chasing of referrals/delegations (NS records).
Yes. That's how public and ISP-provided resolvers already work. (Although some are perhaps more likely to be running Unbound or PowerDNS instead of Bind9.)
There is no querying "up" the DNS chain in this situation. If you don't configure any upstreams (forwarders), Bind9 will start directly at the root zone (using its built-in list of root servers) and will itself do the chasing of referrals/delegations (NS records).
answered Nov 27 at 14:25
grawity
230k35486544
230k35486544
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1378735%2fprivate-dns-global-resolution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown