Finding decreasing sequences in an array of numbers
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
Ants
Requirement
Given a natural number $n$, representing the number of days the study is made, and then a number $x$ of $n$ natural numbers, representing the number of working ant flies after food, where the $x_i$ number of working ants is the day $i$. It is required to determine the number of maximum sequences, ordered strictly decreasing after the number of divisors, of minimum length $2$.
Input data
The input file furnici.in contains two lines. On the first line is the natural number $n$, with the meaning of the requirement and on the second line, the elements of the string $x$, with the meaning in the requirement.
Output data
The output file furnici.out will contain a natural number representing the number of maximum sequences, of minimum length $2$, ordered strictly downwards by the number of divisors.
Restrictions and clarifications
Time Limit - 0.5 seconds
Memory limit - 64 MB Total / 8 MB Stack
$2 leq n leq 100000 $
$10 leq x_i leq 1.000.000.000$
Example
furnici.in
10
719 169 4065 813 289 101 123 516 516 1017
furnici.out
2
Explanation
Row number of divisions is $2 3 8 4 3 2 4 12 12 6$.
It is noted that there are two maximum sequences, of at least two, strictly decreasing, $8 4 3 2$ and $12 6$.
My program is given an array of numbers that it has to find the divisors for and then replace the number in the array with its corresponding number of divisors. In the new created array, it will have to find and count all the descending subsequences that occur.
Here is my code:
#include <iostream>
#include <fstream>
#include <cmath>
using namespace std;
int n,i,v[100001],nr,j,s;
int main()
{
ifstream in("furnici.in");
ofstream out("furnici.out");
in>>n;
for(i=1; i<=n; i++)
{
in>>v[i];
nr=2;
for(j=2; j<=sqrt(v[i]); j++)
{
if(v[i]%j==0)
{
nr++;
if(j!=v[i]/j)
nr++;
}
}
v[i]=nr;
if(v[i]<v[i-1])
{
j=i;
while(v[j]<v[j-1] && j<n)
{
j++;
nr=2;
in>>v[j];
for(int k=2; k<=sqrt(v[j]); k++)
{
if(v[j]%k==0)
{
nr++;
if(k!=v[j]/k)
nr++;
}
}
v[j]=nr;
}
s++;
i=j;
}
}
out<<s;
return 0;
}
furnici.in
10
719 169 4065 813 289 101 123 516 516 1017
furnici.out
2
Explained:
- 10 represents how many numbers are going to be read from the file;
- number 719 has 2 divisors, so 719 gets replaced with 2;
- number 169 has 3 divisors, so 169 gets replaced with 3;
- number 4065 has 8 divisors, so 4065 gets replaced with 8;
- and so on, you kind of get the point. The resulting array will have
descending sequences: 2 3 8 4 3 2 4 12 12 6 and these need to be counted.
The issue with it is that it exceeds the time limit in the last test given to it, but otherwise the answer is correct.
c++ array time-limit-exceeded
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
Ants
Requirement
Given a natural number $n$, representing the number of days the study is made, and then a number $x$ of $n$ natural numbers, representing the number of working ant flies after food, where the $x_i$ number of working ants is the day $i$. It is required to determine the number of maximum sequences, ordered strictly decreasing after the number of divisors, of minimum length $2$.
Input data
The input file furnici.in contains two lines. On the first line is the natural number $n$, with the meaning of the requirement and on the second line, the elements of the string $x$, with the meaning in the requirement.
Output data
The output file furnici.out will contain a natural number representing the number of maximum sequences, of minimum length $2$, ordered strictly downwards by the number of divisors.
Restrictions and clarifications
Time Limit - 0.5 seconds
Memory limit - 64 MB Total / 8 MB Stack
$2 leq n leq 100000 $
$10 leq x_i leq 1.000.000.000$
Example
furnici.in
10
719 169 4065 813 289 101 123 516 516 1017
furnici.out
2
Explanation
Row number of divisions is $2 3 8 4 3 2 4 12 12 6$.
It is noted that there are two maximum sequences, of at least two, strictly decreasing, $8 4 3 2$ and $12 6$.
My program is given an array of numbers that it has to find the divisors for and then replace the number in the array with its corresponding number of divisors. In the new created array, it will have to find and count all the descending subsequences that occur.
Here is my code:
#include <iostream>
#include <fstream>
#include <cmath>
using namespace std;
int n,i,v[100001],nr,j,s;
int main()
{
ifstream in("furnici.in");
ofstream out("furnici.out");
in>>n;
for(i=1; i<=n; i++)
{
in>>v[i];
nr=2;
for(j=2; j<=sqrt(v[i]); j++)
{
if(v[i]%j==0)
{
nr++;
if(j!=v[i]/j)
nr++;
}
}
v[i]=nr;
if(v[i]<v[i-1])
{
j=i;
while(v[j]<v[j-1] && j<n)
{
j++;
nr=2;
in>>v[j];
for(int k=2; k<=sqrt(v[j]); k++)
{
if(v[j]%k==0)
{
nr++;
if(k!=v[j]/k)
nr++;
}
}
v[j]=nr;
}
s++;
i=j;
}
}
out<<s;
return 0;
}
furnici.in
10
719 169 4065 813 289 101 123 516 516 1017
furnici.out
2
Explained:
- 10 represents how many numbers are going to be read from the file;
- number 719 has 2 divisors, so 719 gets replaced with 2;
- number 169 has 3 divisors, so 169 gets replaced with 3;
- number 4065 has 8 divisors, so 4065 gets replaced with 8;
- and so on, you kind of get the point. The resulting array will have
descending sequences: 2 3 8 4 3 2 4 12 12 6 and these need to be counted.
The issue with it is that it exceeds the time limit in the last test given to it, but otherwise the answer is correct.
c++ array time-limit-exceeded
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
Ants
Requirement
Given a natural number $n$, representing the number of days the study is made, and then a number $x$ of $n$ natural numbers, representing the number of working ant flies after food, where the $x_i$ number of working ants is the day $i$. It is required to determine the number of maximum sequences, ordered strictly decreasing after the number of divisors, of minimum length $2$.
Input data
The input file furnici.in contains two lines. On the first line is the natural number $n$, with the meaning of the requirement and on the second line, the elements of the string $x$, with the meaning in the requirement.
Output data
The output file furnici.out will contain a natural number representing the number of maximum sequences, of minimum length $2$, ordered strictly downwards by the number of divisors.
Restrictions and clarifications
Time Limit - 0.5 seconds
Memory limit - 64 MB Total / 8 MB Stack
$2 leq n leq 100000 $
$10 leq x_i leq 1.000.000.000$
Example
furnici.in
10
719 169 4065 813 289 101 123 516 516 1017
furnici.out
2
Explanation
Row number of divisions is $2 3 8 4 3 2 4 12 12 6$.
It is noted that there are two maximum sequences, of at least two, strictly decreasing, $8 4 3 2$ and $12 6$.
My program is given an array of numbers that it has to find the divisors for and then replace the number in the array with its corresponding number of divisors. In the new created array, it will have to find and count all the descending subsequences that occur.
Here is my code:
#include <iostream>
#include <fstream>
#include <cmath>
using namespace std;
int n,i,v[100001],nr,j,s;
int main()
{
ifstream in("furnici.in");
ofstream out("furnici.out");
in>>n;
for(i=1; i<=n; i++)
{
in>>v[i];
nr=2;
for(j=2; j<=sqrt(v[i]); j++)
{
if(v[i]%j==0)
{
nr++;
if(j!=v[i]/j)
nr++;
}
}
v[i]=nr;
if(v[i]<v[i-1])
{
j=i;
while(v[j]<v[j-1] && j<n)
{
j++;
nr=2;
in>>v[j];
for(int k=2; k<=sqrt(v[j]); k++)
{
if(v[j]%k==0)
{
nr++;
if(k!=v[j]/k)
nr++;
}
}
v[j]=nr;
}
s++;
i=j;
}
}
out<<s;
return 0;
}
furnici.in
10
719 169 4065 813 289 101 123 516 516 1017
furnici.out
2
Explained:
- 10 represents how many numbers are going to be read from the file;
- number 719 has 2 divisors, so 719 gets replaced with 2;
- number 169 has 3 divisors, so 169 gets replaced with 3;
- number 4065 has 8 divisors, so 4065 gets replaced with 8;
- and so on, you kind of get the point. The resulting array will have
descending sequences: 2 3 8 4 3 2 4 12 12 6 and these need to be counted.
The issue with it is that it exceeds the time limit in the last test given to it, but otherwise the answer is correct.
c++ array time-limit-exceeded
Ants
Requirement
Given a natural number $n$, representing the number of days the study is made, and then a number $x$ of $n$ natural numbers, representing the number of working ant flies after food, where the $x_i$ number of working ants is the day $i$. It is required to determine the number of maximum sequences, ordered strictly decreasing after the number of divisors, of minimum length $2$.
Input data
The input file furnici.in contains two lines. On the first line is the natural number $n$, with the meaning of the requirement and on the second line, the elements of the string $x$, with the meaning in the requirement.
Output data
The output file furnici.out will contain a natural number representing the number of maximum sequences, of minimum length $2$, ordered strictly downwards by the number of divisors.
Restrictions and clarifications
Time Limit - 0.5 seconds
Memory limit - 64 MB Total / 8 MB Stack
$2 leq n leq 100000 $
$10 leq x_i leq 1.000.000.000$
Example
furnici.in
10
719 169 4065 813 289 101 123 516 516 1017
furnici.out
2
Explanation
Row number of divisions is $2 3 8 4 3 2 4 12 12 6$.
It is noted that there are two maximum sequences, of at least two, strictly decreasing, $8 4 3 2$ and $12 6$.
My program is given an array of numbers that it has to find the divisors for and then replace the number in the array with its corresponding number of divisors. In the new created array, it will have to find and count all the descending subsequences that occur.
Here is my code:
#include <iostream>
#include <fstream>
#include <cmath>
using namespace std;
int n,i,v[100001],nr,j,s;
int main()
{
ifstream in("furnici.in");
ofstream out("furnici.out");
in>>n;
for(i=1; i<=n; i++)
{
in>>v[i];
nr=2;
for(j=2; j<=sqrt(v[i]); j++)
{
if(v[i]%j==0)
{
nr++;
if(j!=v[i]/j)
nr++;
}
}
v[i]=nr;
if(v[i]<v[i-1])
{
j=i;
while(v[j]<v[j-1] && j<n)
{
j++;
nr=2;
in>>v[j];
for(int k=2; k<=sqrt(v[j]); k++)
{
if(v[j]%k==0)
{
nr++;
if(k!=v[j]/k)
nr++;
}
}
v[j]=nr;
}
s++;
i=j;
}
}
out<<s;
return 0;
}
furnici.in
10
719 169 4065 813 289 101 123 516 516 1017
furnici.out
2
Explained:
- 10 represents how many numbers are going to be read from the file;
- number 719 has 2 divisors, so 719 gets replaced with 2;
- number 169 has 3 divisors, so 169 gets replaced with 3;
- number 4065 has 8 divisors, so 4065 gets replaced with 8;
- and so on, you kind of get the point. The resulting array will have
descending sequences: 2 3 8 4 3 2 4 12 12 6 and these need to be counted.
The issue with it is that it exceeds the time limit in the last test given to it, but otherwise the answer is correct.
c++ array time-limit-exceeded
c++ array time-limit-exceeded
edited Nov 25 at 19:32
Snowhawk
5,15911028
5,15911028
asked Nov 25 at 11:14
antoniu200
234
234
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
Some general remarks:
Don't use
namespace std;
, see for example Why is “using namespace std;” considered bad practice?.Define variables at the narrowest possible scope. In particular, avoid
global variables.
Use better variable names. It is unclear what each variable in
int n,i,v[100001],nr,j,s;
stands for.
return 0;
at the end of the main program can be omitted.The range of integer types is implementation defined, the C++ standard only
guarantees that a (signed)int
can hold values from -32767 to 32767,
which is too small for your numbers. Many compilers defineint
as a 32-bit
integer, but you can uselong
to be on the safe side, or use fixed-size
types likeint32_t
.
With respect to readability, I recommend to leave more (horizontal) space,
e.g. around operators and parentheses.
There are two places with identical code to count the divisors
of a number. This should be done in a separate function.
Your code uses a nested loop where the inner loop updates the index of the
outer loop. That is difficult to understand and error-prone. And it is
not necessary: Instead of starting a nested loop when the start of a
decreasing subsequence is found, set a flag instead and continue with the
main loop.
You store all numbers from the input file in an array, which is not necessary:
each loop iteration only needs the previous number to decide if the subsequence
is (still) decreasing. It suffices to store the previously processed number
in a variable.
Summarizing the suggestions so far, the code could look like this:
#include <fstream>
#include <cmath>
long numberOfDivisors(long n) {
long count = 0;
for (long j = 2; j <= sqrt(n); j++) {
if (n % j == 0) {
count++;
if (j != n/j)
count++;
}
}
return count;
}
int main()
{
std::ifstream inFile("furnici.in");
std::ofstream outFile("furnici.out");
long decreasingSequences = 0;
bool isDescending = false;
long lastDivisorCount = 0;
long numDays;
inFile >> numDays;
for (long i = 1; i <= numDays; i++) {
long numAnts;
inFile >> numAnts;
long divisorCount = numberOfDivisors(numAnts);
if (divisorCount >= lastDivisorCount) {
// No longer decreasing.
isDescending = false;
} else if (!isDescending) {
// A decreasing subsequence started right here.
isDescending = true;
decreasingSequences += 1;
}
lastDivisorCount = divisorCount;
}
outFile << decreasingSequences;
}
Now you can start to improve the performance, and the prime candidate is
of course the numberOfDivisors()
function.
An efficient method (and I'm repeating arguments from Getting all divisors from an integer now) is to use the prime factorization: If
$$
n = p_1^{e_1} , p_2^{e_2} cdots p_k^{e_k}
$$
is the factorization of $ n $ into prime numbers $ p_i $
with exponents $ e_i $, then
$$
sigma_0(n) = (e_1+1)(e_2+1) cdots (e_k+1)
$$
is the number of divisors of $ n $, see for example
Wikipedia: Divisor function. Example:
$$
720 = 2^4 cdot 3^2 cdot 5^1 Longrightarrow
sigma_0(720) = (4+1)(2+1)(1+1) = 30 , .
$$
Here is a possible implementation in C:
long numberOfDivisors(long n){
long numDivisors = 1;
long factor = 2; // Candidate for prime factor of `n`
// If `n` is not a prime number then it must have one factor
// which is <= `sqrt(n)`, so we try these first:
while (factor * factor <= n) {
if (n % factor == 0) {
// `factor` is a prime factor of `n`, determine the exponent:
long exponent = 0;
do {
n /= factor;
exponent++;
} while (n % factor == 0);
// `factor^exponent` is one term in the prime factorization of n,
// this contributes as factor `exponent + 1`:
numDivisors *= exponent + 1;
}
// Next possible prime factor:
factor = factor == 2 ? 3 : factor + 2;
}
// Now `n` is either 1 or a prime number. In the latter case,
// it contributes a factor 2:
if (n > 1) {
numDivisors *= 2;
}
return numDivisors;
}
As a further improvement you can pre-compute the prime numbers with a
sieving method. Note that it sufficient to pre-compute the primes in the
range $ 2 ldots sqrt{N} $ where $ N = 10^9 $ is the upper bound for the given input. That should help to stay within the given memory
limit of 64 MB.
This does solve the time issue, but I have a question, as I haven't seen this before: what does this "factor = factor == 2 ? 3 : factor + 2;" line do? Most notably, the question mark.
– antoniu200
Nov 25 at 20:09
1
@antoniu200: That is the “conditional operator” (some people call it “ternary operator”).condition ? expr1 : expr2
evaluates toexpr1
if the condition is true, and toexpr2
otherwise. Here it is a shorthand forif (factor == 2) { factor = 3 } else { factor = factor + 2 }
– Martin R
Nov 25 at 20:14
Thank you very much! I also noticed you edited the SO completely. Thanks for that too, now I know exactly what to include from now on!
– antoniu200
Nov 25 at 20:20
@antoniu200: It was Snowhawk who did the work on your question, not me :)
– Martin R
Nov 25 at 20:22
Whoops! You're right.
– antoniu200
Nov 25 at 20:24
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
Some general remarks:
Don't use
namespace std;
, see for example Why is “using namespace std;” considered bad practice?.Define variables at the narrowest possible scope. In particular, avoid
global variables.
Use better variable names. It is unclear what each variable in
int n,i,v[100001],nr,j,s;
stands for.
return 0;
at the end of the main program can be omitted.The range of integer types is implementation defined, the C++ standard only
guarantees that a (signed)int
can hold values from -32767 to 32767,
which is too small for your numbers. Many compilers defineint
as a 32-bit
integer, but you can uselong
to be on the safe side, or use fixed-size
types likeint32_t
.
With respect to readability, I recommend to leave more (horizontal) space,
e.g. around operators and parentheses.
There are two places with identical code to count the divisors
of a number. This should be done in a separate function.
Your code uses a nested loop where the inner loop updates the index of the
outer loop. That is difficult to understand and error-prone. And it is
not necessary: Instead of starting a nested loop when the start of a
decreasing subsequence is found, set a flag instead and continue with the
main loop.
You store all numbers from the input file in an array, which is not necessary:
each loop iteration only needs the previous number to decide if the subsequence
is (still) decreasing. It suffices to store the previously processed number
in a variable.
Summarizing the suggestions so far, the code could look like this:
#include <fstream>
#include <cmath>
long numberOfDivisors(long n) {
long count = 0;
for (long j = 2; j <= sqrt(n); j++) {
if (n % j == 0) {
count++;
if (j != n/j)
count++;
}
}
return count;
}
int main()
{
std::ifstream inFile("furnici.in");
std::ofstream outFile("furnici.out");
long decreasingSequences = 0;
bool isDescending = false;
long lastDivisorCount = 0;
long numDays;
inFile >> numDays;
for (long i = 1; i <= numDays; i++) {
long numAnts;
inFile >> numAnts;
long divisorCount = numberOfDivisors(numAnts);
if (divisorCount >= lastDivisorCount) {
// No longer decreasing.
isDescending = false;
} else if (!isDescending) {
// A decreasing subsequence started right here.
isDescending = true;
decreasingSequences += 1;
}
lastDivisorCount = divisorCount;
}
outFile << decreasingSequences;
}
Now you can start to improve the performance, and the prime candidate is
of course the numberOfDivisors()
function.
An efficient method (and I'm repeating arguments from Getting all divisors from an integer now) is to use the prime factorization: If
$$
n = p_1^{e_1} , p_2^{e_2} cdots p_k^{e_k}
$$
is the factorization of $ n $ into prime numbers $ p_i $
with exponents $ e_i $, then
$$
sigma_0(n) = (e_1+1)(e_2+1) cdots (e_k+1)
$$
is the number of divisors of $ n $, see for example
Wikipedia: Divisor function. Example:
$$
720 = 2^4 cdot 3^2 cdot 5^1 Longrightarrow
sigma_0(720) = (4+1)(2+1)(1+1) = 30 , .
$$
Here is a possible implementation in C:
long numberOfDivisors(long n){
long numDivisors = 1;
long factor = 2; // Candidate for prime factor of `n`
// If `n` is not a prime number then it must have one factor
// which is <= `sqrt(n)`, so we try these first:
while (factor * factor <= n) {
if (n % factor == 0) {
// `factor` is a prime factor of `n`, determine the exponent:
long exponent = 0;
do {
n /= factor;
exponent++;
} while (n % factor == 0);
// `factor^exponent` is one term in the prime factorization of n,
// this contributes as factor `exponent + 1`:
numDivisors *= exponent + 1;
}
// Next possible prime factor:
factor = factor == 2 ? 3 : factor + 2;
}
// Now `n` is either 1 or a prime number. In the latter case,
// it contributes a factor 2:
if (n > 1) {
numDivisors *= 2;
}
return numDivisors;
}
As a further improvement you can pre-compute the prime numbers with a
sieving method. Note that it sufficient to pre-compute the primes in the
range $ 2 ldots sqrt{N} $ where $ N = 10^9 $ is the upper bound for the given input. That should help to stay within the given memory
limit of 64 MB.
This does solve the time issue, but I have a question, as I haven't seen this before: what does this "factor = factor == 2 ? 3 : factor + 2;" line do? Most notably, the question mark.
– antoniu200
Nov 25 at 20:09
1
@antoniu200: That is the “conditional operator” (some people call it “ternary operator”).condition ? expr1 : expr2
evaluates toexpr1
if the condition is true, and toexpr2
otherwise. Here it is a shorthand forif (factor == 2) { factor = 3 } else { factor = factor + 2 }
– Martin R
Nov 25 at 20:14
Thank you very much! I also noticed you edited the SO completely. Thanks for that too, now I know exactly what to include from now on!
– antoniu200
Nov 25 at 20:20
@antoniu200: It was Snowhawk who did the work on your question, not me :)
– Martin R
Nov 25 at 20:22
Whoops! You're right.
– antoniu200
Nov 25 at 20:24
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
Some general remarks:
Don't use
namespace std;
, see for example Why is “using namespace std;” considered bad practice?.Define variables at the narrowest possible scope. In particular, avoid
global variables.
Use better variable names. It is unclear what each variable in
int n,i,v[100001],nr,j,s;
stands for.
return 0;
at the end of the main program can be omitted.The range of integer types is implementation defined, the C++ standard only
guarantees that a (signed)int
can hold values from -32767 to 32767,
which is too small for your numbers. Many compilers defineint
as a 32-bit
integer, but you can uselong
to be on the safe side, or use fixed-size
types likeint32_t
.
With respect to readability, I recommend to leave more (horizontal) space,
e.g. around operators and parentheses.
There are two places with identical code to count the divisors
of a number. This should be done in a separate function.
Your code uses a nested loop where the inner loop updates the index of the
outer loop. That is difficult to understand and error-prone. And it is
not necessary: Instead of starting a nested loop when the start of a
decreasing subsequence is found, set a flag instead and continue with the
main loop.
You store all numbers from the input file in an array, which is not necessary:
each loop iteration only needs the previous number to decide if the subsequence
is (still) decreasing. It suffices to store the previously processed number
in a variable.
Summarizing the suggestions so far, the code could look like this:
#include <fstream>
#include <cmath>
long numberOfDivisors(long n) {
long count = 0;
for (long j = 2; j <= sqrt(n); j++) {
if (n % j == 0) {
count++;
if (j != n/j)
count++;
}
}
return count;
}
int main()
{
std::ifstream inFile("furnici.in");
std::ofstream outFile("furnici.out");
long decreasingSequences = 0;
bool isDescending = false;
long lastDivisorCount = 0;
long numDays;
inFile >> numDays;
for (long i = 1; i <= numDays; i++) {
long numAnts;
inFile >> numAnts;
long divisorCount = numberOfDivisors(numAnts);
if (divisorCount >= lastDivisorCount) {
// No longer decreasing.
isDescending = false;
} else if (!isDescending) {
// A decreasing subsequence started right here.
isDescending = true;
decreasingSequences += 1;
}
lastDivisorCount = divisorCount;
}
outFile << decreasingSequences;
}
Now you can start to improve the performance, and the prime candidate is
of course the numberOfDivisors()
function.
An efficient method (and I'm repeating arguments from Getting all divisors from an integer now) is to use the prime factorization: If
$$
n = p_1^{e_1} , p_2^{e_2} cdots p_k^{e_k}
$$
is the factorization of $ n $ into prime numbers $ p_i $
with exponents $ e_i $, then
$$
sigma_0(n) = (e_1+1)(e_2+1) cdots (e_k+1)
$$
is the number of divisors of $ n $, see for example
Wikipedia: Divisor function. Example:
$$
720 = 2^4 cdot 3^2 cdot 5^1 Longrightarrow
sigma_0(720) = (4+1)(2+1)(1+1) = 30 , .
$$
Here is a possible implementation in C:
long numberOfDivisors(long n){
long numDivisors = 1;
long factor = 2; // Candidate for prime factor of `n`
// If `n` is not a prime number then it must have one factor
// which is <= `sqrt(n)`, so we try these first:
while (factor * factor <= n) {
if (n % factor == 0) {
// `factor` is a prime factor of `n`, determine the exponent:
long exponent = 0;
do {
n /= factor;
exponent++;
} while (n % factor == 0);
// `factor^exponent` is one term in the prime factorization of n,
// this contributes as factor `exponent + 1`:
numDivisors *= exponent + 1;
}
// Next possible prime factor:
factor = factor == 2 ? 3 : factor + 2;
}
// Now `n` is either 1 or a prime number. In the latter case,
// it contributes a factor 2:
if (n > 1) {
numDivisors *= 2;
}
return numDivisors;
}
As a further improvement you can pre-compute the prime numbers with a
sieving method. Note that it sufficient to pre-compute the primes in the
range $ 2 ldots sqrt{N} $ where $ N = 10^9 $ is the upper bound for the given input. That should help to stay within the given memory
limit of 64 MB.
This does solve the time issue, but I have a question, as I haven't seen this before: what does this "factor = factor == 2 ? 3 : factor + 2;" line do? Most notably, the question mark.
– antoniu200
Nov 25 at 20:09
1
@antoniu200: That is the “conditional operator” (some people call it “ternary operator”).condition ? expr1 : expr2
evaluates toexpr1
if the condition is true, and toexpr2
otherwise. Here it is a shorthand forif (factor == 2) { factor = 3 } else { factor = factor + 2 }
– Martin R
Nov 25 at 20:14
Thank you very much! I also noticed you edited the SO completely. Thanks for that too, now I know exactly what to include from now on!
– antoniu200
Nov 25 at 20:20
@antoniu200: It was Snowhawk who did the work on your question, not me :)
– Martin R
Nov 25 at 20:22
Whoops! You're right.
– antoniu200
Nov 25 at 20:24
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
Some general remarks:
Don't use
namespace std;
, see for example Why is “using namespace std;” considered bad practice?.Define variables at the narrowest possible scope. In particular, avoid
global variables.
Use better variable names. It is unclear what each variable in
int n,i,v[100001],nr,j,s;
stands for.
return 0;
at the end of the main program can be omitted.The range of integer types is implementation defined, the C++ standard only
guarantees that a (signed)int
can hold values from -32767 to 32767,
which is too small for your numbers. Many compilers defineint
as a 32-bit
integer, but you can uselong
to be on the safe side, or use fixed-size
types likeint32_t
.
With respect to readability, I recommend to leave more (horizontal) space,
e.g. around operators and parentheses.
There are two places with identical code to count the divisors
of a number. This should be done in a separate function.
Your code uses a nested loop where the inner loop updates the index of the
outer loop. That is difficult to understand and error-prone. And it is
not necessary: Instead of starting a nested loop when the start of a
decreasing subsequence is found, set a flag instead and continue with the
main loop.
You store all numbers from the input file in an array, which is not necessary:
each loop iteration only needs the previous number to decide if the subsequence
is (still) decreasing. It suffices to store the previously processed number
in a variable.
Summarizing the suggestions so far, the code could look like this:
#include <fstream>
#include <cmath>
long numberOfDivisors(long n) {
long count = 0;
for (long j = 2; j <= sqrt(n); j++) {
if (n % j == 0) {
count++;
if (j != n/j)
count++;
}
}
return count;
}
int main()
{
std::ifstream inFile("furnici.in");
std::ofstream outFile("furnici.out");
long decreasingSequences = 0;
bool isDescending = false;
long lastDivisorCount = 0;
long numDays;
inFile >> numDays;
for (long i = 1; i <= numDays; i++) {
long numAnts;
inFile >> numAnts;
long divisorCount = numberOfDivisors(numAnts);
if (divisorCount >= lastDivisorCount) {
// No longer decreasing.
isDescending = false;
} else if (!isDescending) {
// A decreasing subsequence started right here.
isDescending = true;
decreasingSequences += 1;
}
lastDivisorCount = divisorCount;
}
outFile << decreasingSequences;
}
Now you can start to improve the performance, and the prime candidate is
of course the numberOfDivisors()
function.
An efficient method (and I'm repeating arguments from Getting all divisors from an integer now) is to use the prime factorization: If
$$
n = p_1^{e_1} , p_2^{e_2} cdots p_k^{e_k}
$$
is the factorization of $ n $ into prime numbers $ p_i $
with exponents $ e_i $, then
$$
sigma_0(n) = (e_1+1)(e_2+1) cdots (e_k+1)
$$
is the number of divisors of $ n $, see for example
Wikipedia: Divisor function. Example:
$$
720 = 2^4 cdot 3^2 cdot 5^1 Longrightarrow
sigma_0(720) = (4+1)(2+1)(1+1) = 30 , .
$$
Here is a possible implementation in C:
long numberOfDivisors(long n){
long numDivisors = 1;
long factor = 2; // Candidate for prime factor of `n`
// If `n` is not a prime number then it must have one factor
// which is <= `sqrt(n)`, so we try these first:
while (factor * factor <= n) {
if (n % factor == 0) {
// `factor` is a prime factor of `n`, determine the exponent:
long exponent = 0;
do {
n /= factor;
exponent++;
} while (n % factor == 0);
// `factor^exponent` is one term in the prime factorization of n,
// this contributes as factor `exponent + 1`:
numDivisors *= exponent + 1;
}
// Next possible prime factor:
factor = factor == 2 ? 3 : factor + 2;
}
// Now `n` is either 1 or a prime number. In the latter case,
// it contributes a factor 2:
if (n > 1) {
numDivisors *= 2;
}
return numDivisors;
}
As a further improvement you can pre-compute the prime numbers with a
sieving method. Note that it sufficient to pre-compute the primes in the
range $ 2 ldots sqrt{N} $ where $ N = 10^9 $ is the upper bound for the given input. That should help to stay within the given memory
limit of 64 MB.
Some general remarks:
Don't use
namespace std;
, see for example Why is “using namespace std;” considered bad practice?.Define variables at the narrowest possible scope. In particular, avoid
global variables.
Use better variable names. It is unclear what each variable in
int n,i,v[100001],nr,j,s;
stands for.
return 0;
at the end of the main program can be omitted.The range of integer types is implementation defined, the C++ standard only
guarantees that a (signed)int
can hold values from -32767 to 32767,
which is too small for your numbers. Many compilers defineint
as a 32-bit
integer, but you can uselong
to be on the safe side, or use fixed-size
types likeint32_t
.
With respect to readability, I recommend to leave more (horizontal) space,
e.g. around operators and parentheses.
There are two places with identical code to count the divisors
of a number. This should be done in a separate function.
Your code uses a nested loop where the inner loop updates the index of the
outer loop. That is difficult to understand and error-prone. And it is
not necessary: Instead of starting a nested loop when the start of a
decreasing subsequence is found, set a flag instead and continue with the
main loop.
You store all numbers from the input file in an array, which is not necessary:
each loop iteration only needs the previous number to decide if the subsequence
is (still) decreasing. It suffices to store the previously processed number
in a variable.
Summarizing the suggestions so far, the code could look like this:
#include <fstream>
#include <cmath>
long numberOfDivisors(long n) {
long count = 0;
for (long j = 2; j <= sqrt(n); j++) {
if (n % j == 0) {
count++;
if (j != n/j)
count++;
}
}
return count;
}
int main()
{
std::ifstream inFile("furnici.in");
std::ofstream outFile("furnici.out");
long decreasingSequences = 0;
bool isDescending = false;
long lastDivisorCount = 0;
long numDays;
inFile >> numDays;
for (long i = 1; i <= numDays; i++) {
long numAnts;
inFile >> numAnts;
long divisorCount = numberOfDivisors(numAnts);
if (divisorCount >= lastDivisorCount) {
// No longer decreasing.
isDescending = false;
} else if (!isDescending) {
// A decreasing subsequence started right here.
isDescending = true;
decreasingSequences += 1;
}
lastDivisorCount = divisorCount;
}
outFile << decreasingSequences;
}
Now you can start to improve the performance, and the prime candidate is
of course the numberOfDivisors()
function.
An efficient method (and I'm repeating arguments from Getting all divisors from an integer now) is to use the prime factorization: If
$$
n = p_1^{e_1} , p_2^{e_2} cdots p_k^{e_k}
$$
is the factorization of $ n $ into prime numbers $ p_i $
with exponents $ e_i $, then
$$
sigma_0(n) = (e_1+1)(e_2+1) cdots (e_k+1)
$$
is the number of divisors of $ n $, see for example
Wikipedia: Divisor function. Example:
$$
720 = 2^4 cdot 3^2 cdot 5^1 Longrightarrow
sigma_0(720) = (4+1)(2+1)(1+1) = 30 , .
$$
Here is a possible implementation in C:
long numberOfDivisors(long n){
long numDivisors = 1;
long factor = 2; // Candidate for prime factor of `n`
// If `n` is not a prime number then it must have one factor
// which is <= `sqrt(n)`, so we try these first:
while (factor * factor <= n) {
if (n % factor == 0) {
// `factor` is a prime factor of `n`, determine the exponent:
long exponent = 0;
do {
n /= factor;
exponent++;
} while (n % factor == 0);
// `factor^exponent` is one term in the prime factorization of n,
// this contributes as factor `exponent + 1`:
numDivisors *= exponent + 1;
}
// Next possible prime factor:
factor = factor == 2 ? 3 : factor + 2;
}
// Now `n` is either 1 or a prime number. In the latter case,
// it contributes a factor 2:
if (n > 1) {
numDivisors *= 2;
}
return numDivisors;
}
As a further improvement you can pre-compute the prime numbers with a
sieving method. Note that it sufficient to pre-compute the primes in the
range $ 2 ldots sqrt{N} $ where $ N = 10^9 $ is the upper bound for the given input. That should help to stay within the given memory
limit of 64 MB.
edited Nov 25 at 20:15
answered Nov 25 at 19:32
Martin R
15.4k12264
15.4k12264
This does solve the time issue, but I have a question, as I haven't seen this before: what does this "factor = factor == 2 ? 3 : factor + 2;" line do? Most notably, the question mark.
– antoniu200
Nov 25 at 20:09
1
@antoniu200: That is the “conditional operator” (some people call it “ternary operator”).condition ? expr1 : expr2
evaluates toexpr1
if the condition is true, and toexpr2
otherwise. Here it is a shorthand forif (factor == 2) { factor = 3 } else { factor = factor + 2 }
– Martin R
Nov 25 at 20:14
Thank you very much! I also noticed you edited the SO completely. Thanks for that too, now I know exactly what to include from now on!
– antoniu200
Nov 25 at 20:20
@antoniu200: It was Snowhawk who did the work on your question, not me :)
– Martin R
Nov 25 at 20:22
Whoops! You're right.
– antoniu200
Nov 25 at 20:24
add a comment |
This does solve the time issue, but I have a question, as I haven't seen this before: what does this "factor = factor == 2 ? 3 : factor + 2;" line do? Most notably, the question mark.
– antoniu200
Nov 25 at 20:09
1
@antoniu200: That is the “conditional operator” (some people call it “ternary operator”).condition ? expr1 : expr2
evaluates toexpr1
if the condition is true, and toexpr2
otherwise. Here it is a shorthand forif (factor == 2) { factor = 3 } else { factor = factor + 2 }
– Martin R
Nov 25 at 20:14
Thank you very much! I also noticed you edited the SO completely. Thanks for that too, now I know exactly what to include from now on!
– antoniu200
Nov 25 at 20:20
@antoniu200: It was Snowhawk who did the work on your question, not me :)
– Martin R
Nov 25 at 20:22
Whoops! You're right.
– antoniu200
Nov 25 at 20:24
This does solve the time issue, but I have a question, as I haven't seen this before: what does this "factor = factor == 2 ? 3 : factor + 2;" line do? Most notably, the question mark.
– antoniu200
Nov 25 at 20:09
This does solve the time issue, but I have a question, as I haven't seen this before: what does this "factor = factor == 2 ? 3 : factor + 2;" line do? Most notably, the question mark.
– antoniu200
Nov 25 at 20:09
1
1
@antoniu200: That is the “conditional operator” (some people call it “ternary operator”).
condition ? expr1 : expr2
evaluates to expr1
if the condition is true, and to expr2
otherwise. Here it is a shorthand for if (factor == 2) { factor = 3 } else { factor = factor + 2 }
– Martin R
Nov 25 at 20:14
@antoniu200: That is the “conditional operator” (some people call it “ternary operator”).
condition ? expr1 : expr2
evaluates to expr1
if the condition is true, and to expr2
otherwise. Here it is a shorthand for if (factor == 2) { factor = 3 } else { factor = factor + 2 }
– Martin R
Nov 25 at 20:14
Thank you very much! I also noticed you edited the SO completely. Thanks for that too, now I know exactly what to include from now on!
– antoniu200
Nov 25 at 20:20
Thank you very much! I also noticed you edited the SO completely. Thanks for that too, now I know exactly what to include from now on!
– antoniu200
Nov 25 at 20:20
@antoniu200: It was Snowhawk who did the work on your question, not me :)
– Martin R
Nov 25 at 20:22
@antoniu200: It was Snowhawk who did the work on your question, not me :)
– Martin R
Nov 25 at 20:22
Whoops! You're right.
– antoniu200
Nov 25 at 20:24
Whoops! You're right.
– antoniu200
Nov 25 at 20:24
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f208368%2ffinding-decreasing-sequences-in-an-array-of-numbers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown