Explicit computation of the Burnside ring











up vote
6
down vote

favorite












I would like to see explicit computations of the Burnside ring $A(G)$ when $G$ is a small Abelian group, such as $G=mathbb{Z}/2,mathbb{Z}/2^n,mathbb{Z}/p^n$ where $p$ is an odd prime and $ngeqslant 1$. Here, by explicit I mean in terms of generators and relations. I know that there there is a certain map with finite cokernel. But, I don't see any generators in these descriptions. Surely, for something like $mathbb{Z}/2$ it must be well known!



I would be very grateful for any reference. Here, $mathbb{Z}/k$ is the cyclic group of order $k$.



I particular, I wonder if there is a ``canonical'' presentation of this ring?!?



I would be very grateful for any references.










share|cite|improve this question


















  • 3




    The table of marks is a useful way to do this: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burnside_ring#Marks
    – Drew Heard
    Nov 20 at 7:55






  • 1




    GAP knows tables of marks for quite a few groups, see gap-system.org/Manuals/doc/ref/chap70.html
    – Dima Pasechnik
    Nov 24 at 16:10















up vote
6
down vote

favorite












I would like to see explicit computations of the Burnside ring $A(G)$ when $G$ is a small Abelian group, such as $G=mathbb{Z}/2,mathbb{Z}/2^n,mathbb{Z}/p^n$ where $p$ is an odd prime and $ngeqslant 1$. Here, by explicit I mean in terms of generators and relations. I know that there there is a certain map with finite cokernel. But, I don't see any generators in these descriptions. Surely, for something like $mathbb{Z}/2$ it must be well known!



I would be very grateful for any reference. Here, $mathbb{Z}/k$ is the cyclic group of order $k$.



I particular, I wonder if there is a ``canonical'' presentation of this ring?!?



I would be very grateful for any references.










share|cite|improve this question


















  • 3




    The table of marks is a useful way to do this: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burnside_ring#Marks
    – Drew Heard
    Nov 20 at 7:55






  • 1




    GAP knows tables of marks for quite a few groups, see gap-system.org/Manuals/doc/ref/chap70.html
    – Dima Pasechnik
    Nov 24 at 16:10













up vote
6
down vote

favorite









up vote
6
down vote

favorite











I would like to see explicit computations of the Burnside ring $A(G)$ when $G$ is a small Abelian group, such as $G=mathbb{Z}/2,mathbb{Z}/2^n,mathbb{Z}/p^n$ where $p$ is an odd prime and $ngeqslant 1$. Here, by explicit I mean in terms of generators and relations. I know that there there is a certain map with finite cokernel. But, I don't see any generators in these descriptions. Surely, for something like $mathbb{Z}/2$ it must be well known!



I would be very grateful for any reference. Here, $mathbb{Z}/k$ is the cyclic group of order $k$.



I particular, I wonder if there is a ``canonical'' presentation of this ring?!?



I would be very grateful for any references.










share|cite|improve this question













I would like to see explicit computations of the Burnside ring $A(G)$ when $G$ is a small Abelian group, such as $G=mathbb{Z}/2,mathbb{Z}/2^n,mathbb{Z}/p^n$ where $p$ is an odd prime and $ngeqslant 1$. Here, by explicit I mean in terms of generators and relations. I know that there there is a certain map with finite cokernel. But, I don't see any generators in these descriptions. Surely, for something like $mathbb{Z}/2$ it must be well known!



I would be very grateful for any reference. Here, $mathbb{Z}/k$ is the cyclic group of order $k$.



I particular, I wonder if there is a ``canonical'' presentation of this ring?!?



I would be very grateful for any references.







reference-request at.algebraic-topology gr.group-theory finite-groups






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Nov 20 at 7:13









user51223

1,331617




1,331617








  • 3




    The table of marks is a useful way to do this: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burnside_ring#Marks
    – Drew Heard
    Nov 20 at 7:55






  • 1




    GAP knows tables of marks for quite a few groups, see gap-system.org/Manuals/doc/ref/chap70.html
    – Dima Pasechnik
    Nov 24 at 16:10














  • 3




    The table of marks is a useful way to do this: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burnside_ring#Marks
    – Drew Heard
    Nov 20 at 7:55






  • 1




    GAP knows tables of marks for quite a few groups, see gap-system.org/Manuals/doc/ref/chap70.html
    – Dima Pasechnik
    Nov 24 at 16:10








3




3




The table of marks is a useful way to do this: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burnside_ring#Marks
– Drew Heard
Nov 20 at 7:55




The table of marks is a useful way to do this: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burnside_ring#Marks
– Drew Heard
Nov 20 at 7:55




1




1




GAP knows tables of marks for quite a few groups, see gap-system.org/Manuals/doc/ref/chap70.html
– Dima Pasechnik
Nov 24 at 16:10




GAP knows tables of marks for quite a few groups, see gap-system.org/Manuals/doc/ref/chap70.html
– Dima Pasechnik
Nov 24 at 16:10










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
7
down vote













The Bernside ring is generated by the classes of transitive $G$-sets.
The multiplication table is then given by a Mackey-like formula:
$$[G/H]times [G/K]=sum_{Hbackslash G/K} [G/H cap gKg^{-1}]$$.
This follows from the classical fact that $Hbackslash G/Kcong G backslash (G/Htimes G/K)$
For example, in the case $G=mathbb{Z}/p^n
$
the generators are $a_k = [G/(mathbb{Z}/p^k)]$ for $kle n$. The relations are then
$$a_i a_j = a_i p ^{n-j}$$ is $jge i$. This follows directly from the formula for the product and the fact that all the subgroups of an abelian group are normal, so double cosets are just cosets for the sum.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Does this work when $p=2$? And is this an integral description so that $$A(G)simeqmathbb{Z}[a_itextrm{ with }ileqslant n:a_ia_j=a_ip^{n-j}textrm{ whenever }jgeqslant i]$$. And I presume there is no grading associated to the generators, right? And would this be a ``canonical presentations''?
    – user51223
    Nov 20 at 7:51




















up vote
1
down vote













Although the answer by S. camell is perfect, personally I find the use of Mackey-like formula here is an over-kill.



Let's use the same notation. As a set $a_ia_j$ is just $Z/p^{n-i}times Z/p^{n-j}$,
and $Z/p^n$ is acting diagonally on this. Clearly $p^i$ acts trivially on this and $p^{i-1}$ don't fix any element, so all orbits are isomorphic to $a_i$. By counting elements of the set we see that $a_ia_j=p^{n-j}a_i$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "504"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f315758%2fexplicit-computation-of-the-burnside-ring%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    7
    down vote













    The Bernside ring is generated by the classes of transitive $G$-sets.
    The multiplication table is then given by a Mackey-like formula:
    $$[G/H]times [G/K]=sum_{Hbackslash G/K} [G/H cap gKg^{-1}]$$.
    This follows from the classical fact that $Hbackslash G/Kcong G backslash (G/Htimes G/K)$
    For example, in the case $G=mathbb{Z}/p^n
    $
    the generators are $a_k = [G/(mathbb{Z}/p^k)]$ for $kle n$. The relations are then
    $$a_i a_j = a_i p ^{n-j}$$ is $jge i$. This follows directly from the formula for the product and the fact that all the subgroups of an abelian group are normal, so double cosets are just cosets for the sum.






    share|cite|improve this answer





















    • Does this work when $p=2$? And is this an integral description so that $$A(G)simeqmathbb{Z}[a_itextrm{ with }ileqslant n:a_ia_j=a_ip^{n-j}textrm{ whenever }jgeqslant i]$$. And I presume there is no grading associated to the generators, right? And would this be a ``canonical presentations''?
      – user51223
      Nov 20 at 7:51

















    up vote
    7
    down vote













    The Bernside ring is generated by the classes of transitive $G$-sets.
    The multiplication table is then given by a Mackey-like formula:
    $$[G/H]times [G/K]=sum_{Hbackslash G/K} [G/H cap gKg^{-1}]$$.
    This follows from the classical fact that $Hbackslash G/Kcong G backslash (G/Htimes G/K)$
    For example, in the case $G=mathbb{Z}/p^n
    $
    the generators are $a_k = [G/(mathbb{Z}/p^k)]$ for $kle n$. The relations are then
    $$a_i a_j = a_i p ^{n-j}$$ is $jge i$. This follows directly from the formula for the product and the fact that all the subgroups of an abelian group are normal, so double cosets are just cosets for the sum.






    share|cite|improve this answer





















    • Does this work when $p=2$? And is this an integral description so that $$A(G)simeqmathbb{Z}[a_itextrm{ with }ileqslant n:a_ia_j=a_ip^{n-j}textrm{ whenever }jgeqslant i]$$. And I presume there is no grading associated to the generators, right? And would this be a ``canonical presentations''?
      – user51223
      Nov 20 at 7:51















    up vote
    7
    down vote










    up vote
    7
    down vote









    The Bernside ring is generated by the classes of transitive $G$-sets.
    The multiplication table is then given by a Mackey-like formula:
    $$[G/H]times [G/K]=sum_{Hbackslash G/K} [G/H cap gKg^{-1}]$$.
    This follows from the classical fact that $Hbackslash G/Kcong G backslash (G/Htimes G/K)$
    For example, in the case $G=mathbb{Z}/p^n
    $
    the generators are $a_k = [G/(mathbb{Z}/p^k)]$ for $kle n$. The relations are then
    $$a_i a_j = a_i p ^{n-j}$$ is $jge i$. This follows directly from the formula for the product and the fact that all the subgroups of an abelian group are normal, so double cosets are just cosets for the sum.






    share|cite|improve this answer












    The Bernside ring is generated by the classes of transitive $G$-sets.
    The multiplication table is then given by a Mackey-like formula:
    $$[G/H]times [G/K]=sum_{Hbackslash G/K} [G/H cap gKg^{-1}]$$.
    This follows from the classical fact that $Hbackslash G/Kcong G backslash (G/Htimes G/K)$
    For example, in the case $G=mathbb{Z}/p^n
    $
    the generators are $a_k = [G/(mathbb{Z}/p^k)]$ for $kle n$. The relations are then
    $$a_i a_j = a_i p ^{n-j}$$ is $jge i$. This follows directly from the formula for the product and the fact that all the subgroups of an abelian group are normal, so double cosets are just cosets for the sum.







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered Nov 20 at 7:41









    S. carmeli

    2,260519




    2,260519












    • Does this work when $p=2$? And is this an integral description so that $$A(G)simeqmathbb{Z}[a_itextrm{ with }ileqslant n:a_ia_j=a_ip^{n-j}textrm{ whenever }jgeqslant i]$$. And I presume there is no grading associated to the generators, right? And would this be a ``canonical presentations''?
      – user51223
      Nov 20 at 7:51




















    • Does this work when $p=2$? And is this an integral description so that $$A(G)simeqmathbb{Z}[a_itextrm{ with }ileqslant n:a_ia_j=a_ip^{n-j}textrm{ whenever }jgeqslant i]$$. And I presume there is no grading associated to the generators, right? And would this be a ``canonical presentations''?
      – user51223
      Nov 20 at 7:51


















    Does this work when $p=2$? And is this an integral description so that $$A(G)simeqmathbb{Z}[a_itextrm{ with }ileqslant n:a_ia_j=a_ip^{n-j}textrm{ whenever }jgeqslant i]$$. And I presume there is no grading associated to the generators, right? And would this be a ``canonical presentations''?
    – user51223
    Nov 20 at 7:51






    Does this work when $p=2$? And is this an integral description so that $$A(G)simeqmathbb{Z}[a_itextrm{ with }ileqslant n:a_ia_j=a_ip^{n-j}textrm{ whenever }jgeqslant i]$$. And I presume there is no grading associated to the generators, right? And would this be a ``canonical presentations''?
    – user51223
    Nov 20 at 7:51












    up vote
    1
    down vote













    Although the answer by S. camell is perfect, personally I find the use of Mackey-like formula here is an over-kill.



    Let's use the same notation. As a set $a_ia_j$ is just $Z/p^{n-i}times Z/p^{n-j}$,
    and $Z/p^n$ is acting diagonally on this. Clearly $p^i$ acts trivially on this and $p^{i-1}$ don't fix any element, so all orbits are isomorphic to $a_i$. By counting elements of the set we see that $a_ia_j=p^{n-j}a_i$.






    share|cite|improve this answer

























      up vote
      1
      down vote













      Although the answer by S. camell is perfect, personally I find the use of Mackey-like formula here is an over-kill.



      Let's use the same notation. As a set $a_ia_j$ is just $Z/p^{n-i}times Z/p^{n-j}$,
      and $Z/p^n$ is acting diagonally on this. Clearly $p^i$ acts trivially on this and $p^{i-1}$ don't fix any element, so all orbits are isomorphic to $a_i$. By counting elements of the set we see that $a_ia_j=p^{n-j}a_i$.






      share|cite|improve this answer























        up vote
        1
        down vote










        up vote
        1
        down vote









        Although the answer by S. camell is perfect, personally I find the use of Mackey-like formula here is an over-kill.



        Let's use the same notation. As a set $a_ia_j$ is just $Z/p^{n-i}times Z/p^{n-j}$,
        and $Z/p^n$ is acting diagonally on this. Clearly $p^i$ acts trivially on this and $p^{i-1}$ don't fix any element, so all orbits are isomorphic to $a_i$. By counting elements of the set we see that $a_ia_j=p^{n-j}a_i$.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        Although the answer by S. camell is perfect, personally I find the use of Mackey-like formula here is an over-kill.



        Let's use the same notation. As a set $a_ia_j$ is just $Z/p^{n-i}times Z/p^{n-j}$,
        and $Z/p^n$ is acting diagonally on this. Clearly $p^i$ acts trivially on this and $p^{i-1}$ don't fix any element, so all orbits are isomorphic to $a_i$. By counting elements of the set we see that $a_ia_j=p^{n-j}a_i$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Nov 24 at 8:57









        user43326

        1,850818




        1,850818






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f315758%2fexplicit-computation-of-the-burnside-ring%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Сан-Квентин

            Алькесар

            Josef Freinademetz