Why is it safer to isolate the crew on every other deck?





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}






up vote
19
down vote

favorite
1












I know nothing about the military, so I apologize if this is obvious. Why is this practical?




CRUSHER: I recommend we evacuate and seal off all non-operational areas, and group the families and crew on the odd-numbered decks.




Booby Trap










share|improve this question




























    up vote
    19
    down vote

    favorite
    1












    I know nothing about the military, so I apologize if this is obvious. Why is this practical?




    CRUSHER: I recommend we evacuate and seal off all non-operational areas, and group the families and crew on the odd-numbered decks.




    Booby Trap










    share|improve this question
























      up vote
      19
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      19
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1





      I know nothing about the military, so I apologize if this is obvious. Why is this practical?




      CRUSHER: I recommend we evacuate and seal off all non-operational areas, and group the families and crew on the odd-numbered decks.




      Booby Trap










      share|improve this question













      I know nothing about the military, so I apologize if this is obvious. Why is this practical?




      CRUSHER: I recommend we evacuate and seal off all non-operational areas, and group the families and crew on the odd-numbered decks.




      Booby Trap







      star-trek star-trek-tng






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked yesterday









      1252748

      1,18411429




      1,18411429






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          47
          down vote













          The ship is experiencing a rapid energy drain and is operating on reserve power. Since we know that a very sizeable chunk of the ship's energy output is channelled into keeping the crew alive (59.2%?), taking out half of the ship's decks would result in a dramatic lowering of their energy needs and usage for heating, gravity control, lighting, life-support, etc and hence increase the length of time that the shields can remain up.




          GEORDI: With the engines idling, the energy loss has been limited. But our reserves will be depleted in less than three hours. We won't be able to hold our shields in place.




          As to why they have them move to the odd-numbered decks (rather than having them all cluster in the centre of the ship, for example) one assumes this is because a) Now only half the ship's crew have to move at all b) The half that have to move only have to move up or down one deck, minimising turbolift use.



          (h/t to ApproachingDarknessFish)






          share|improve this answer



















          • 12




            @EikePierstorff By using odd-numbered decks, half the crew doesn't need to move, and the other half only needs to move one level. In order to use, for example, the upper half of the ship, half the crew doesn't move, and the other half has to move on average about 10 levels.
            – ApproachingDarknessFish
            yesterday






          • 2




            the life-support requirements should more depend on the number of lifes, not on living space. everything exept gravity at least.
            – ths
            yesterday






          • 22




            @ths - Actually it's not entirely clear why a) Why life-support takes such a colossal amount of power and b) Why when life support shuts down every starts choking instantly instead of just breathing the available hour for several hours. Chalk it down to the need to inject urgency into a scene.
            – Valorum
            yesterday






          • 3




            @user20310 dissipating body heat depends obviously on #bodies. (in space, you don't need heating)
            – ths
            yesterday






          • 2




            @Valorum That number may also include gravity plating and heating
            – Izkata
            yesterday


















          up vote
          16
          down vote













          Using odd numbered decks is simple, convenient, and easy to communicate.



          The key point here is to reduce the number of occupied decks. By specifying odd-numbered decks, people only have to move one deck up or down. Only the people on even-numbered decks have to move at all and it is easy for people to verify for themselves that they have moved to a safe deck. This simplicity should make the evacuation process easier and reduce the risk of anybody being on an unsafe deck by mistake. If you add the additional instruction that people on even-numbered decks move one deck up, then everybody is moving in the same direction.



          It is a bit like the problem of separating a group of people into two equal sized sub-groups. If you just say get into pairs, they will take forever. If you line them up and give them each a number, it is much easier to divide them up as you wish.






          share|improve this answer






























            up vote
            3
            down vote













            One good reason would be to minimise risk if the situation escalates further.



            Escape pods are evenly distributed across the ship.



            Getting people onto even-numbered decks means that if they need to evacuate, then people can get to the escape pods quickly and efficiently, and with minimal overcrowding.



            On the other hand, if everyone is moved to the upper decks and you need to evacuate, the escape pods on the lower decks would go unused and the ones on the upper deck would be overcrowded.






            share|improve this answer








            New contributor




            Spudley is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.


















            • Putting everyone on the upper half of the ship doesn't overcrowd the decks any more than putting everyone on odd numbered decks. In the the first case, the lower deck escape pods go unused; in the latter, the even deck escape pods go unused. Either way, the escape pod capacity needs to be double the ship population.
              – Nuclear Wang
              yesterday






            • 2




              @NuclearWang but if you assume escape pods on every deck with some surplus capacity but not huge amounts, people are 0-1 decks from a pod in one situation, while in the other some of them may be half a ship away
              – Chris H
              yesterday






            • 3




              @NuclearWang - if everyone is on even decks, they can get to the pod on the adjacent decks reasonably quickly; even in the worst case, if the turbolifts are inactive, the next deck is only a short jeffries tube away so if the pods on the deck you're on are full, then you still have options. If everyone if on upper decks, the pods on the lowest decks can't be accessed in a timely manner at all by anyone; you don't have another in an emergency option if the pod is full.
              – Spudley
              yesterday










            • My understanding is that they basically shut down the decks not in use. Once you've sealed off the unused decks, you can't access the escape pods from there anyway. Not much of a "seal" otherwise.
              – Nuclear Wang
              yesterday






            • 1




              @einpoklum - The ship also has emergency transporters situated all over the ship including in the centre of the saucer section
              – Valorum
              yesterday











            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "186"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f198476%2fwhy-is-it-safer-to-isolate-the-crew-on-every-other-deck%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest
































            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes








            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            47
            down vote













            The ship is experiencing a rapid energy drain and is operating on reserve power. Since we know that a very sizeable chunk of the ship's energy output is channelled into keeping the crew alive (59.2%?), taking out half of the ship's decks would result in a dramatic lowering of their energy needs and usage for heating, gravity control, lighting, life-support, etc and hence increase the length of time that the shields can remain up.




            GEORDI: With the engines idling, the energy loss has been limited. But our reserves will be depleted in less than three hours. We won't be able to hold our shields in place.




            As to why they have them move to the odd-numbered decks (rather than having them all cluster in the centre of the ship, for example) one assumes this is because a) Now only half the ship's crew have to move at all b) The half that have to move only have to move up or down one deck, minimising turbolift use.



            (h/t to ApproachingDarknessFish)






            share|improve this answer



















            • 12




              @EikePierstorff By using odd-numbered decks, half the crew doesn't need to move, and the other half only needs to move one level. In order to use, for example, the upper half of the ship, half the crew doesn't move, and the other half has to move on average about 10 levels.
              – ApproachingDarknessFish
              yesterday






            • 2




              the life-support requirements should more depend on the number of lifes, not on living space. everything exept gravity at least.
              – ths
              yesterday






            • 22




              @ths - Actually it's not entirely clear why a) Why life-support takes such a colossal amount of power and b) Why when life support shuts down every starts choking instantly instead of just breathing the available hour for several hours. Chalk it down to the need to inject urgency into a scene.
              – Valorum
              yesterday






            • 3




              @user20310 dissipating body heat depends obviously on #bodies. (in space, you don't need heating)
              – ths
              yesterday






            • 2




              @Valorum That number may also include gravity plating and heating
              – Izkata
              yesterday















            up vote
            47
            down vote













            The ship is experiencing a rapid energy drain and is operating on reserve power. Since we know that a very sizeable chunk of the ship's energy output is channelled into keeping the crew alive (59.2%?), taking out half of the ship's decks would result in a dramatic lowering of their energy needs and usage for heating, gravity control, lighting, life-support, etc and hence increase the length of time that the shields can remain up.




            GEORDI: With the engines idling, the energy loss has been limited. But our reserves will be depleted in less than three hours. We won't be able to hold our shields in place.




            As to why they have them move to the odd-numbered decks (rather than having them all cluster in the centre of the ship, for example) one assumes this is because a) Now only half the ship's crew have to move at all b) The half that have to move only have to move up or down one deck, minimising turbolift use.



            (h/t to ApproachingDarknessFish)






            share|improve this answer



















            • 12




              @EikePierstorff By using odd-numbered decks, half the crew doesn't need to move, and the other half only needs to move one level. In order to use, for example, the upper half of the ship, half the crew doesn't move, and the other half has to move on average about 10 levels.
              – ApproachingDarknessFish
              yesterday






            • 2




              the life-support requirements should more depend on the number of lifes, not on living space. everything exept gravity at least.
              – ths
              yesterday






            • 22




              @ths - Actually it's not entirely clear why a) Why life-support takes such a colossal amount of power and b) Why when life support shuts down every starts choking instantly instead of just breathing the available hour for several hours. Chalk it down to the need to inject urgency into a scene.
              – Valorum
              yesterday






            • 3




              @user20310 dissipating body heat depends obviously on #bodies. (in space, you don't need heating)
              – ths
              yesterday






            • 2




              @Valorum That number may also include gravity plating and heating
              – Izkata
              yesterday













            up vote
            47
            down vote










            up vote
            47
            down vote









            The ship is experiencing a rapid energy drain and is operating on reserve power. Since we know that a very sizeable chunk of the ship's energy output is channelled into keeping the crew alive (59.2%?), taking out half of the ship's decks would result in a dramatic lowering of their energy needs and usage for heating, gravity control, lighting, life-support, etc and hence increase the length of time that the shields can remain up.




            GEORDI: With the engines idling, the energy loss has been limited. But our reserves will be depleted in less than three hours. We won't be able to hold our shields in place.




            As to why they have them move to the odd-numbered decks (rather than having them all cluster in the centre of the ship, for example) one assumes this is because a) Now only half the ship's crew have to move at all b) The half that have to move only have to move up or down one deck, minimising turbolift use.



            (h/t to ApproachingDarknessFish)






            share|improve this answer














            The ship is experiencing a rapid energy drain and is operating on reserve power. Since we know that a very sizeable chunk of the ship's energy output is channelled into keeping the crew alive (59.2%?), taking out half of the ship's decks would result in a dramatic lowering of their energy needs and usage for heating, gravity control, lighting, life-support, etc and hence increase the length of time that the shields can remain up.




            GEORDI: With the engines idling, the energy loss has been limited. But our reserves will be depleted in less than three hours. We won't be able to hold our shields in place.




            As to why they have them move to the odd-numbered decks (rather than having them all cluster in the centre of the ship, for example) one assumes this is because a) Now only half the ship's crew have to move at all b) The half that have to move only have to move up or down one deck, minimising turbolift use.



            (h/t to ApproachingDarknessFish)







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited yesterday

























            answered yesterday









            Valorum

            386k10028073040




            386k10028073040








            • 12




              @EikePierstorff By using odd-numbered decks, half the crew doesn't need to move, and the other half only needs to move one level. In order to use, for example, the upper half of the ship, half the crew doesn't move, and the other half has to move on average about 10 levels.
              – ApproachingDarknessFish
              yesterday






            • 2




              the life-support requirements should more depend on the number of lifes, not on living space. everything exept gravity at least.
              – ths
              yesterday






            • 22




              @ths - Actually it's not entirely clear why a) Why life-support takes such a colossal amount of power and b) Why when life support shuts down every starts choking instantly instead of just breathing the available hour for several hours. Chalk it down to the need to inject urgency into a scene.
              – Valorum
              yesterday






            • 3




              @user20310 dissipating body heat depends obviously on #bodies. (in space, you don't need heating)
              – ths
              yesterday






            • 2




              @Valorum That number may also include gravity plating and heating
              – Izkata
              yesterday














            • 12




              @EikePierstorff By using odd-numbered decks, half the crew doesn't need to move, and the other half only needs to move one level. In order to use, for example, the upper half of the ship, half the crew doesn't move, and the other half has to move on average about 10 levels.
              – ApproachingDarknessFish
              yesterday






            • 2




              the life-support requirements should more depend on the number of lifes, not on living space. everything exept gravity at least.
              – ths
              yesterday






            • 22




              @ths - Actually it's not entirely clear why a) Why life-support takes such a colossal amount of power and b) Why when life support shuts down every starts choking instantly instead of just breathing the available hour for several hours. Chalk it down to the need to inject urgency into a scene.
              – Valorum
              yesterday






            • 3




              @user20310 dissipating body heat depends obviously on #bodies. (in space, you don't need heating)
              – ths
              yesterday






            • 2




              @Valorum That number may also include gravity plating and heating
              – Izkata
              yesterday








            12




            12




            @EikePierstorff By using odd-numbered decks, half the crew doesn't need to move, and the other half only needs to move one level. In order to use, for example, the upper half of the ship, half the crew doesn't move, and the other half has to move on average about 10 levels.
            – ApproachingDarknessFish
            yesterday




            @EikePierstorff By using odd-numbered decks, half the crew doesn't need to move, and the other half only needs to move one level. In order to use, for example, the upper half of the ship, half the crew doesn't move, and the other half has to move on average about 10 levels.
            – ApproachingDarknessFish
            yesterday




            2




            2




            the life-support requirements should more depend on the number of lifes, not on living space. everything exept gravity at least.
            – ths
            yesterday




            the life-support requirements should more depend on the number of lifes, not on living space. everything exept gravity at least.
            – ths
            yesterday




            22




            22




            @ths - Actually it's not entirely clear why a) Why life-support takes such a colossal amount of power and b) Why when life support shuts down every starts choking instantly instead of just breathing the available hour for several hours. Chalk it down to the need to inject urgency into a scene.
            – Valorum
            yesterday




            @ths - Actually it's not entirely clear why a) Why life-support takes such a colossal amount of power and b) Why when life support shuts down every starts choking instantly instead of just breathing the available hour for several hours. Chalk it down to the need to inject urgency into a scene.
            – Valorum
            yesterday




            3




            3




            @user20310 dissipating body heat depends obviously on #bodies. (in space, you don't need heating)
            – ths
            yesterday




            @user20310 dissipating body heat depends obviously on #bodies. (in space, you don't need heating)
            – ths
            yesterday




            2




            2




            @Valorum That number may also include gravity plating and heating
            – Izkata
            yesterday




            @Valorum That number may also include gravity plating and heating
            – Izkata
            yesterday












            up vote
            16
            down vote













            Using odd numbered decks is simple, convenient, and easy to communicate.



            The key point here is to reduce the number of occupied decks. By specifying odd-numbered decks, people only have to move one deck up or down. Only the people on even-numbered decks have to move at all and it is easy for people to verify for themselves that they have moved to a safe deck. This simplicity should make the evacuation process easier and reduce the risk of anybody being on an unsafe deck by mistake. If you add the additional instruction that people on even-numbered decks move one deck up, then everybody is moving in the same direction.



            It is a bit like the problem of separating a group of people into two equal sized sub-groups. If you just say get into pairs, they will take forever. If you line them up and give them each a number, it is much easier to divide them up as you wish.






            share|improve this answer



























              up vote
              16
              down vote













              Using odd numbered decks is simple, convenient, and easy to communicate.



              The key point here is to reduce the number of occupied decks. By specifying odd-numbered decks, people only have to move one deck up or down. Only the people on even-numbered decks have to move at all and it is easy for people to verify for themselves that they have moved to a safe deck. This simplicity should make the evacuation process easier and reduce the risk of anybody being on an unsafe deck by mistake. If you add the additional instruction that people on even-numbered decks move one deck up, then everybody is moving in the same direction.



              It is a bit like the problem of separating a group of people into two equal sized sub-groups. If you just say get into pairs, they will take forever. If you line them up and give them each a number, it is much easier to divide them up as you wish.






              share|improve this answer

























                up vote
                16
                down vote










                up vote
                16
                down vote









                Using odd numbered decks is simple, convenient, and easy to communicate.



                The key point here is to reduce the number of occupied decks. By specifying odd-numbered decks, people only have to move one deck up or down. Only the people on even-numbered decks have to move at all and it is easy for people to verify for themselves that they have moved to a safe deck. This simplicity should make the evacuation process easier and reduce the risk of anybody being on an unsafe deck by mistake. If you add the additional instruction that people on even-numbered decks move one deck up, then everybody is moving in the same direction.



                It is a bit like the problem of separating a group of people into two equal sized sub-groups. If you just say get into pairs, they will take forever. If you line them up and give them each a number, it is much easier to divide them up as you wish.






                share|improve this answer














                Using odd numbered decks is simple, convenient, and easy to communicate.



                The key point here is to reduce the number of occupied decks. By specifying odd-numbered decks, people only have to move one deck up or down. Only the people on even-numbered decks have to move at all and it is easy for people to verify for themselves that they have moved to a safe deck. This simplicity should make the evacuation process easier and reduce the risk of anybody being on an unsafe deck by mistake. If you add the additional instruction that people on even-numbered decks move one deck up, then everybody is moving in the same direction.



                It is a bit like the problem of separating a group of people into two equal sized sub-groups. If you just say get into pairs, they will take forever. If you line them up and give them each a number, it is much easier to divide them up as you wish.







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited yesterday









                DonBoitnott

                1033




                1033










                answered yesterday









                Chris Johns

                2,7411112




                2,7411112






















                    up vote
                    3
                    down vote













                    One good reason would be to minimise risk if the situation escalates further.



                    Escape pods are evenly distributed across the ship.



                    Getting people onto even-numbered decks means that if they need to evacuate, then people can get to the escape pods quickly and efficiently, and with minimal overcrowding.



                    On the other hand, if everyone is moved to the upper decks and you need to evacuate, the escape pods on the lower decks would go unused and the ones on the upper deck would be overcrowded.






                    share|improve this answer








                    New contributor




                    Spudley is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.


















                    • Putting everyone on the upper half of the ship doesn't overcrowd the decks any more than putting everyone on odd numbered decks. In the the first case, the lower deck escape pods go unused; in the latter, the even deck escape pods go unused. Either way, the escape pod capacity needs to be double the ship population.
                      – Nuclear Wang
                      yesterday






                    • 2




                      @NuclearWang but if you assume escape pods on every deck with some surplus capacity but not huge amounts, people are 0-1 decks from a pod in one situation, while in the other some of them may be half a ship away
                      – Chris H
                      yesterday






                    • 3




                      @NuclearWang - if everyone is on even decks, they can get to the pod on the adjacent decks reasonably quickly; even in the worst case, if the turbolifts are inactive, the next deck is only a short jeffries tube away so if the pods on the deck you're on are full, then you still have options. If everyone if on upper decks, the pods on the lowest decks can't be accessed in a timely manner at all by anyone; you don't have another in an emergency option if the pod is full.
                      – Spudley
                      yesterday










                    • My understanding is that they basically shut down the decks not in use. Once you've sealed off the unused decks, you can't access the escape pods from there anyway. Not much of a "seal" otherwise.
                      – Nuclear Wang
                      yesterday






                    • 1




                      @einpoklum - The ship also has emergency transporters situated all over the ship including in the centre of the saucer section
                      – Valorum
                      yesterday















                    up vote
                    3
                    down vote













                    One good reason would be to minimise risk if the situation escalates further.



                    Escape pods are evenly distributed across the ship.



                    Getting people onto even-numbered decks means that if they need to evacuate, then people can get to the escape pods quickly and efficiently, and with minimal overcrowding.



                    On the other hand, if everyone is moved to the upper decks and you need to evacuate, the escape pods on the lower decks would go unused and the ones on the upper deck would be overcrowded.






                    share|improve this answer








                    New contributor




                    Spudley is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.


















                    • Putting everyone on the upper half of the ship doesn't overcrowd the decks any more than putting everyone on odd numbered decks. In the the first case, the lower deck escape pods go unused; in the latter, the even deck escape pods go unused. Either way, the escape pod capacity needs to be double the ship population.
                      – Nuclear Wang
                      yesterday






                    • 2




                      @NuclearWang but if you assume escape pods on every deck with some surplus capacity but not huge amounts, people are 0-1 decks from a pod in one situation, while in the other some of them may be half a ship away
                      – Chris H
                      yesterday






                    • 3




                      @NuclearWang - if everyone is on even decks, they can get to the pod on the adjacent decks reasonably quickly; even in the worst case, if the turbolifts are inactive, the next deck is only a short jeffries tube away so if the pods on the deck you're on are full, then you still have options. If everyone if on upper decks, the pods on the lowest decks can't be accessed in a timely manner at all by anyone; you don't have another in an emergency option if the pod is full.
                      – Spudley
                      yesterday










                    • My understanding is that they basically shut down the decks not in use. Once you've sealed off the unused decks, you can't access the escape pods from there anyway. Not much of a "seal" otherwise.
                      – Nuclear Wang
                      yesterday






                    • 1




                      @einpoklum - The ship also has emergency transporters situated all over the ship including in the centre of the saucer section
                      – Valorum
                      yesterday













                    up vote
                    3
                    down vote










                    up vote
                    3
                    down vote









                    One good reason would be to minimise risk if the situation escalates further.



                    Escape pods are evenly distributed across the ship.



                    Getting people onto even-numbered decks means that if they need to evacuate, then people can get to the escape pods quickly and efficiently, and with minimal overcrowding.



                    On the other hand, if everyone is moved to the upper decks and you need to evacuate, the escape pods on the lower decks would go unused and the ones on the upper deck would be overcrowded.






                    share|improve this answer








                    New contributor




                    Spudley is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.









                    One good reason would be to minimise risk if the situation escalates further.



                    Escape pods are evenly distributed across the ship.



                    Getting people onto even-numbered decks means that if they need to evacuate, then people can get to the escape pods quickly and efficiently, and with minimal overcrowding.



                    On the other hand, if everyone is moved to the upper decks and you need to evacuate, the escape pods on the lower decks would go unused and the ones on the upper deck would be overcrowded.







                    share|improve this answer








                    New contributor




                    Spudley is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.









                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer






                    New contributor




                    Spudley is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.









                    answered yesterday









                    Spudley

                    1551




                    1551




                    New contributor




                    Spudley is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.





                    New contributor





                    Spudley is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.






                    Spudley is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.












                    • Putting everyone on the upper half of the ship doesn't overcrowd the decks any more than putting everyone on odd numbered decks. In the the first case, the lower deck escape pods go unused; in the latter, the even deck escape pods go unused. Either way, the escape pod capacity needs to be double the ship population.
                      – Nuclear Wang
                      yesterday






                    • 2




                      @NuclearWang but if you assume escape pods on every deck with some surplus capacity but not huge amounts, people are 0-1 decks from a pod in one situation, while in the other some of them may be half a ship away
                      – Chris H
                      yesterday






                    • 3




                      @NuclearWang - if everyone is on even decks, they can get to the pod on the adjacent decks reasonably quickly; even in the worst case, if the turbolifts are inactive, the next deck is only a short jeffries tube away so if the pods on the deck you're on are full, then you still have options. If everyone if on upper decks, the pods on the lowest decks can't be accessed in a timely manner at all by anyone; you don't have another in an emergency option if the pod is full.
                      – Spudley
                      yesterday










                    • My understanding is that they basically shut down the decks not in use. Once you've sealed off the unused decks, you can't access the escape pods from there anyway. Not much of a "seal" otherwise.
                      – Nuclear Wang
                      yesterday






                    • 1




                      @einpoklum - The ship also has emergency transporters situated all over the ship including in the centre of the saucer section
                      – Valorum
                      yesterday


















                    • Putting everyone on the upper half of the ship doesn't overcrowd the decks any more than putting everyone on odd numbered decks. In the the first case, the lower deck escape pods go unused; in the latter, the even deck escape pods go unused. Either way, the escape pod capacity needs to be double the ship population.
                      – Nuclear Wang
                      yesterday






                    • 2




                      @NuclearWang but if you assume escape pods on every deck with some surplus capacity but not huge amounts, people are 0-1 decks from a pod in one situation, while in the other some of them may be half a ship away
                      – Chris H
                      yesterday






                    • 3




                      @NuclearWang - if everyone is on even decks, they can get to the pod on the adjacent decks reasonably quickly; even in the worst case, if the turbolifts are inactive, the next deck is only a short jeffries tube away so if the pods on the deck you're on are full, then you still have options. If everyone if on upper decks, the pods on the lowest decks can't be accessed in a timely manner at all by anyone; you don't have another in an emergency option if the pod is full.
                      – Spudley
                      yesterday










                    • My understanding is that they basically shut down the decks not in use. Once you've sealed off the unused decks, you can't access the escape pods from there anyway. Not much of a "seal" otherwise.
                      – Nuclear Wang
                      yesterday






                    • 1




                      @einpoklum - The ship also has emergency transporters situated all over the ship including in the centre of the saucer section
                      – Valorum
                      yesterday
















                    Putting everyone on the upper half of the ship doesn't overcrowd the decks any more than putting everyone on odd numbered decks. In the the first case, the lower deck escape pods go unused; in the latter, the even deck escape pods go unused. Either way, the escape pod capacity needs to be double the ship population.
                    – Nuclear Wang
                    yesterday




                    Putting everyone on the upper half of the ship doesn't overcrowd the decks any more than putting everyone on odd numbered decks. In the the first case, the lower deck escape pods go unused; in the latter, the even deck escape pods go unused. Either way, the escape pod capacity needs to be double the ship population.
                    – Nuclear Wang
                    yesterday




                    2




                    2




                    @NuclearWang but if you assume escape pods on every deck with some surplus capacity but not huge amounts, people are 0-1 decks from a pod in one situation, while in the other some of them may be half a ship away
                    – Chris H
                    yesterday




                    @NuclearWang but if you assume escape pods on every deck with some surplus capacity but not huge amounts, people are 0-1 decks from a pod in one situation, while in the other some of them may be half a ship away
                    – Chris H
                    yesterday




                    3




                    3




                    @NuclearWang - if everyone is on even decks, they can get to the pod on the adjacent decks reasonably quickly; even in the worst case, if the turbolifts are inactive, the next deck is only a short jeffries tube away so if the pods on the deck you're on are full, then you still have options. If everyone if on upper decks, the pods on the lowest decks can't be accessed in a timely manner at all by anyone; you don't have another in an emergency option if the pod is full.
                    – Spudley
                    yesterday




                    @NuclearWang - if everyone is on even decks, they can get to the pod on the adjacent decks reasonably quickly; even in the worst case, if the turbolifts are inactive, the next deck is only a short jeffries tube away so if the pods on the deck you're on are full, then you still have options. If everyone if on upper decks, the pods on the lowest decks can't be accessed in a timely manner at all by anyone; you don't have another in an emergency option if the pod is full.
                    – Spudley
                    yesterday












                    My understanding is that they basically shut down the decks not in use. Once you've sealed off the unused decks, you can't access the escape pods from there anyway. Not much of a "seal" otherwise.
                    – Nuclear Wang
                    yesterday




                    My understanding is that they basically shut down the decks not in use. Once you've sealed off the unused decks, you can't access the escape pods from there anyway. Not much of a "seal" otherwise.
                    – Nuclear Wang
                    yesterday




                    1




                    1




                    @einpoklum - The ship also has emergency transporters situated all over the ship including in the centre of the saucer section
                    – Valorum
                    yesterday




                    @einpoklum - The ship also has emergency transporters situated all over the ship including in the centre of the saucer section
                    – Valorum
                    yesterday


















                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded



















































                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f198476%2fwhy-is-it-safer-to-isolate-the-crew-on-every-other-deck%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest




















































































                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Сан-Квентин

                    8-я гвардейская общевойсковая армия

                    Алькесар