Has an encirclement ever succeeded with numerically inferior cavalry?












2















This is a follow up to my previous question. In all the examples given there was some other advantage that decided the battle and not encirclement. For example at Narva




They attacked inexperienced Russian regiments and crumbled them one by one.




Also Finnish Motti tactics in the winter war, Teutoburg etc are a type of divide and conquer ambush tactic and not simply an encirclement. At Alesia there are no historical details but I have not seen evidence Rome had less cavalry than the enemy.



I cant find any examples where the encircler didn't have have a superior local number of motivated cavalry.



Has an encirclement ever succeeded with numerically inferior cavalry?










share|improve this question





























    2















    This is a follow up to my previous question. In all the examples given there was some other advantage that decided the battle and not encirclement. For example at Narva




    They attacked inexperienced Russian regiments and crumbled them one by one.




    Also Finnish Motti tactics in the winter war, Teutoburg etc are a type of divide and conquer ambush tactic and not simply an encirclement. At Alesia there are no historical details but I have not seen evidence Rome had less cavalry than the enemy.



    I cant find any examples where the encircler didn't have have a superior local number of motivated cavalry.



    Has an encirclement ever succeeded with numerically inferior cavalry?










    share|improve this question



























      2












      2








      2








      This is a follow up to my previous question. In all the examples given there was some other advantage that decided the battle and not encirclement. For example at Narva




      They attacked inexperienced Russian regiments and crumbled them one by one.




      Also Finnish Motti tactics in the winter war, Teutoburg etc are a type of divide and conquer ambush tactic and not simply an encirclement. At Alesia there are no historical details but I have not seen evidence Rome had less cavalry than the enemy.



      I cant find any examples where the encircler didn't have have a superior local number of motivated cavalry.



      Has an encirclement ever succeeded with numerically inferior cavalry?










      share|improve this question
















      This is a follow up to my previous question. In all the examples given there was some other advantage that decided the battle and not encirclement. For example at Narva




      They attacked inexperienced Russian regiments and crumbled them one by one.




      Also Finnish Motti tactics in the winter war, Teutoburg etc are a type of divide and conquer ambush tactic and not simply an encirclement. At Alesia there are no historical details but I have not seen evidence Rome had less cavalry than the enemy.



      I cant find any examples where the encircler didn't have have a superior local number of motivated cavalry.



      Has an encirclement ever succeeded with numerically inferior cavalry?







      war






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Dec 16 '18 at 18:37









      Mark C. Wallace

      23.4k972111




      23.4k972111










      asked Dec 14 '18 at 20:44







      user34841





























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          8














          I'm not sure if this counts as a valid answer, but ships of the line are always superior to cavalry. Or, in this case: nearly always.



          In 1793 the Dutch fleet was frozen at anchor, moored close to Den Helder, near the island of Texel. That winter was quite severe. Even the Rhine river froze over, as were parts of the North Sea close to shore. The Dutch republic was at war with the French republic - and losing. A French cavalry unit captured the fleet intact.



          General Pichechru (in Dutch he's known as Pietje Cru) knew the ships were iced in. He ordered the very appropriate named general Jan Willem de Winter to capture the fleet intact. He used hussars and infantry, carried on the backs of the horses. The hooves were covered with fabric to muffle the sound. The hussars rode up to the ships, quietly, and the infantry boarded the ships. The fleet was captured intact, without casualties.



          That capture ended the war. It's one of the very few examples in history of cavalry capturing a fleet.






          share|improve this answer





















          • 1





            I learned that story at my father's knee - well done!

            – Pieter Geerkens
            Dec 15 '18 at 0:09






          • 1





            @PieterGeerkens I think this is the only example in history of general Winter actually being present in the flesh on a battlefield.

            – Jos
            Dec 15 '18 at 0:44








          • 2





            @PieterGeerkens Oh. Was there a general (de) Winter present? I meant literally, not figuratively. The chap capturing that fleet was named de Winter.

            – Jos
            Dec 15 '18 at 0:57













          • The general is named 'Pichegru' in French.

            – Evargalo
            Dec 15 '18 at 12:11



















          5














          The Battle of Cowpens where 300 British cavalry (250 of the British Legion plus 50 of the 17th Light Dragoons) outnumbered American Cavalry of only ~180 men and horses ("82 Continental light dragoons; 55 state dragoons; 45 militia dragoons") by almost 2:1.



          Total forces for both sides were about 1,150 British against about 1,900 (most poorly trained and disciplined militia) Americans.




          Caught in a clever double envelopment that has been compared with the Battle of Cannae in ancient times, many of the British surrendered.




          AN interesting note - in both this battle and Cannae, Morgan and Hannibal leverage the very weakness of their main battle line into a tactical advantage that sets up the double envelopment.



          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer





















          • 2





            Do Dragoons really count as cavalry??!!?!one. ducks and hides

            – Samuel Russell
            Dec 15 '18 at 1:09








          • 1





            @SamuelRussell: Emmanuel Grouchy's dragoons were always competent cavalry. Prior to the 1840's I doubt a British dragoon, light or heavy, could have distinguished a carbine from a pistol.

            – Pieter Geerkens
            Dec 15 '18 at 1:22













          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "324"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fhistory.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f50101%2fhas-an-encirclement-ever-succeeded-with-numerically-inferior-cavalry%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown
























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          8














          I'm not sure if this counts as a valid answer, but ships of the line are always superior to cavalry. Or, in this case: nearly always.



          In 1793 the Dutch fleet was frozen at anchor, moored close to Den Helder, near the island of Texel. That winter was quite severe. Even the Rhine river froze over, as were parts of the North Sea close to shore. The Dutch republic was at war with the French republic - and losing. A French cavalry unit captured the fleet intact.



          General Pichechru (in Dutch he's known as Pietje Cru) knew the ships were iced in. He ordered the very appropriate named general Jan Willem de Winter to capture the fleet intact. He used hussars and infantry, carried on the backs of the horses. The hooves were covered with fabric to muffle the sound. The hussars rode up to the ships, quietly, and the infantry boarded the ships. The fleet was captured intact, without casualties.



          That capture ended the war. It's one of the very few examples in history of cavalry capturing a fleet.






          share|improve this answer





















          • 1





            I learned that story at my father's knee - well done!

            – Pieter Geerkens
            Dec 15 '18 at 0:09






          • 1





            @PieterGeerkens I think this is the only example in history of general Winter actually being present in the flesh on a battlefield.

            – Jos
            Dec 15 '18 at 0:44








          • 2





            @PieterGeerkens Oh. Was there a general (de) Winter present? I meant literally, not figuratively. The chap capturing that fleet was named de Winter.

            – Jos
            Dec 15 '18 at 0:57













          • The general is named 'Pichegru' in French.

            – Evargalo
            Dec 15 '18 at 12:11
















          8














          I'm not sure if this counts as a valid answer, but ships of the line are always superior to cavalry. Or, in this case: nearly always.



          In 1793 the Dutch fleet was frozen at anchor, moored close to Den Helder, near the island of Texel. That winter was quite severe. Even the Rhine river froze over, as were parts of the North Sea close to shore. The Dutch republic was at war with the French republic - and losing. A French cavalry unit captured the fleet intact.



          General Pichechru (in Dutch he's known as Pietje Cru) knew the ships were iced in. He ordered the very appropriate named general Jan Willem de Winter to capture the fleet intact. He used hussars and infantry, carried on the backs of the horses. The hooves were covered with fabric to muffle the sound. The hussars rode up to the ships, quietly, and the infantry boarded the ships. The fleet was captured intact, without casualties.



          That capture ended the war. It's one of the very few examples in history of cavalry capturing a fleet.






          share|improve this answer





















          • 1





            I learned that story at my father's knee - well done!

            – Pieter Geerkens
            Dec 15 '18 at 0:09






          • 1





            @PieterGeerkens I think this is the only example in history of general Winter actually being present in the flesh on a battlefield.

            – Jos
            Dec 15 '18 at 0:44








          • 2





            @PieterGeerkens Oh. Was there a general (de) Winter present? I meant literally, not figuratively. The chap capturing that fleet was named de Winter.

            – Jos
            Dec 15 '18 at 0:57













          • The general is named 'Pichegru' in French.

            – Evargalo
            Dec 15 '18 at 12:11














          8












          8








          8







          I'm not sure if this counts as a valid answer, but ships of the line are always superior to cavalry. Or, in this case: nearly always.



          In 1793 the Dutch fleet was frozen at anchor, moored close to Den Helder, near the island of Texel. That winter was quite severe. Even the Rhine river froze over, as were parts of the North Sea close to shore. The Dutch republic was at war with the French republic - and losing. A French cavalry unit captured the fleet intact.



          General Pichechru (in Dutch he's known as Pietje Cru) knew the ships were iced in. He ordered the very appropriate named general Jan Willem de Winter to capture the fleet intact. He used hussars and infantry, carried on the backs of the horses. The hooves were covered with fabric to muffle the sound. The hussars rode up to the ships, quietly, and the infantry boarded the ships. The fleet was captured intact, without casualties.



          That capture ended the war. It's one of the very few examples in history of cavalry capturing a fleet.






          share|improve this answer















          I'm not sure if this counts as a valid answer, but ships of the line are always superior to cavalry. Or, in this case: nearly always.



          In 1793 the Dutch fleet was frozen at anchor, moored close to Den Helder, near the island of Texel. That winter was quite severe. Even the Rhine river froze over, as were parts of the North Sea close to shore. The Dutch republic was at war with the French republic - and losing. A French cavalry unit captured the fleet intact.



          General Pichechru (in Dutch he's known as Pietje Cru) knew the ships were iced in. He ordered the very appropriate named general Jan Willem de Winter to capture the fleet intact. He used hussars and infantry, carried on the backs of the horses. The hooves were covered with fabric to muffle the sound. The hussars rode up to the ships, quietly, and the infantry boarded the ships. The fleet was captured intact, without casualties.



          That capture ended the war. It's one of the very few examples in history of cavalry capturing a fleet.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Dec 16 '18 at 0:58

























          answered Dec 15 '18 at 0:03









          JosJos

          8,61412244




          8,61412244








          • 1





            I learned that story at my father's knee - well done!

            – Pieter Geerkens
            Dec 15 '18 at 0:09






          • 1





            @PieterGeerkens I think this is the only example in history of general Winter actually being present in the flesh on a battlefield.

            – Jos
            Dec 15 '18 at 0:44








          • 2





            @PieterGeerkens Oh. Was there a general (de) Winter present? I meant literally, not figuratively. The chap capturing that fleet was named de Winter.

            – Jos
            Dec 15 '18 at 0:57













          • The general is named 'Pichegru' in French.

            – Evargalo
            Dec 15 '18 at 12:11














          • 1





            I learned that story at my father's knee - well done!

            – Pieter Geerkens
            Dec 15 '18 at 0:09






          • 1





            @PieterGeerkens I think this is the only example in history of general Winter actually being present in the flesh on a battlefield.

            – Jos
            Dec 15 '18 at 0:44








          • 2





            @PieterGeerkens Oh. Was there a general (de) Winter present? I meant literally, not figuratively. The chap capturing that fleet was named de Winter.

            – Jos
            Dec 15 '18 at 0:57













          • The general is named 'Pichegru' in French.

            – Evargalo
            Dec 15 '18 at 12:11








          1




          1





          I learned that story at my father's knee - well done!

          – Pieter Geerkens
          Dec 15 '18 at 0:09





          I learned that story at my father's knee - well done!

          – Pieter Geerkens
          Dec 15 '18 at 0:09




          1




          1





          @PieterGeerkens I think this is the only example in history of general Winter actually being present in the flesh on a battlefield.

          – Jos
          Dec 15 '18 at 0:44







          @PieterGeerkens I think this is the only example in history of general Winter actually being present in the flesh on a battlefield.

          – Jos
          Dec 15 '18 at 0:44






          2




          2





          @PieterGeerkens Oh. Was there a general (de) Winter present? I meant literally, not figuratively. The chap capturing that fleet was named de Winter.

          – Jos
          Dec 15 '18 at 0:57







          @PieterGeerkens Oh. Was there a general (de) Winter present? I meant literally, not figuratively. The chap capturing that fleet was named de Winter.

          – Jos
          Dec 15 '18 at 0:57















          The general is named 'Pichegru' in French.

          – Evargalo
          Dec 15 '18 at 12:11





          The general is named 'Pichegru' in French.

          – Evargalo
          Dec 15 '18 at 12:11











          5














          The Battle of Cowpens where 300 British cavalry (250 of the British Legion plus 50 of the 17th Light Dragoons) outnumbered American Cavalry of only ~180 men and horses ("82 Continental light dragoons; 55 state dragoons; 45 militia dragoons") by almost 2:1.



          Total forces for both sides were about 1,150 British against about 1,900 (most poorly trained and disciplined militia) Americans.




          Caught in a clever double envelopment that has been compared with the Battle of Cannae in ancient times, many of the British surrendered.




          AN interesting note - in both this battle and Cannae, Morgan and Hannibal leverage the very weakness of their main battle line into a tactical advantage that sets up the double envelopment.



          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer





















          • 2





            Do Dragoons really count as cavalry??!!?!one. ducks and hides

            – Samuel Russell
            Dec 15 '18 at 1:09








          • 1





            @SamuelRussell: Emmanuel Grouchy's dragoons were always competent cavalry. Prior to the 1840's I doubt a British dragoon, light or heavy, could have distinguished a carbine from a pistol.

            – Pieter Geerkens
            Dec 15 '18 at 1:22


















          5














          The Battle of Cowpens where 300 British cavalry (250 of the British Legion plus 50 of the 17th Light Dragoons) outnumbered American Cavalry of only ~180 men and horses ("82 Continental light dragoons; 55 state dragoons; 45 militia dragoons") by almost 2:1.



          Total forces for both sides were about 1,150 British against about 1,900 (most poorly trained and disciplined militia) Americans.




          Caught in a clever double envelopment that has been compared with the Battle of Cannae in ancient times, many of the British surrendered.




          AN interesting note - in both this battle and Cannae, Morgan and Hannibal leverage the very weakness of their main battle line into a tactical advantage that sets up the double envelopment.



          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer





















          • 2





            Do Dragoons really count as cavalry??!!?!one. ducks and hides

            – Samuel Russell
            Dec 15 '18 at 1:09








          • 1





            @SamuelRussell: Emmanuel Grouchy's dragoons were always competent cavalry. Prior to the 1840's I doubt a British dragoon, light or heavy, could have distinguished a carbine from a pistol.

            – Pieter Geerkens
            Dec 15 '18 at 1:22
















          5












          5








          5







          The Battle of Cowpens where 300 British cavalry (250 of the British Legion plus 50 of the 17th Light Dragoons) outnumbered American Cavalry of only ~180 men and horses ("82 Continental light dragoons; 55 state dragoons; 45 militia dragoons") by almost 2:1.



          Total forces for both sides were about 1,150 British against about 1,900 (most poorly trained and disciplined militia) Americans.




          Caught in a clever double envelopment that has been compared with the Battle of Cannae in ancient times, many of the British surrendered.




          AN interesting note - in both this battle and Cannae, Morgan and Hannibal leverage the very weakness of their main battle line into a tactical advantage that sets up the double envelopment.



          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer















          The Battle of Cowpens where 300 British cavalry (250 of the British Legion plus 50 of the 17th Light Dragoons) outnumbered American Cavalry of only ~180 men and horses ("82 Continental light dragoons; 55 state dragoons; 45 militia dragoons") by almost 2:1.



          Total forces for both sides were about 1,150 British against about 1,900 (most poorly trained and disciplined militia) Americans.




          Caught in a clever double envelopment that has been compared with the Battle of Cannae in ancient times, many of the British surrendered.




          AN interesting note - in both this battle and Cannae, Morgan and Hannibal leverage the very weakness of their main battle line into a tactical advantage that sets up the double envelopment.



          enter image description here







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Dec 14 '18 at 22:43

























          answered Dec 14 '18 at 21:06









          Pieter GeerkensPieter Geerkens

          39.4k6116188




          39.4k6116188








          • 2





            Do Dragoons really count as cavalry??!!?!one. ducks and hides

            – Samuel Russell
            Dec 15 '18 at 1:09








          • 1





            @SamuelRussell: Emmanuel Grouchy's dragoons were always competent cavalry. Prior to the 1840's I doubt a British dragoon, light or heavy, could have distinguished a carbine from a pistol.

            – Pieter Geerkens
            Dec 15 '18 at 1:22
















          • 2





            Do Dragoons really count as cavalry??!!?!one. ducks and hides

            – Samuel Russell
            Dec 15 '18 at 1:09








          • 1





            @SamuelRussell: Emmanuel Grouchy's dragoons were always competent cavalry. Prior to the 1840's I doubt a British dragoon, light or heavy, could have distinguished a carbine from a pistol.

            – Pieter Geerkens
            Dec 15 '18 at 1:22










          2




          2





          Do Dragoons really count as cavalry??!!?!one. ducks and hides

          – Samuel Russell
          Dec 15 '18 at 1:09







          Do Dragoons really count as cavalry??!!?!one. ducks and hides

          – Samuel Russell
          Dec 15 '18 at 1:09






          1




          1





          @SamuelRussell: Emmanuel Grouchy's dragoons were always competent cavalry. Prior to the 1840's I doubt a British dragoon, light or heavy, could have distinguished a carbine from a pistol.

          – Pieter Geerkens
          Dec 15 '18 at 1:22







          @SamuelRussell: Emmanuel Grouchy's dragoons were always competent cavalry. Prior to the 1840's I doubt a British dragoon, light or heavy, could have distinguished a carbine from a pistol.

          – Pieter Geerkens
          Dec 15 '18 at 1:22




















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to History Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fhistory.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f50101%2fhas-an-encirclement-ever-succeeded-with-numerically-inferior-cavalry%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Список кардиналов, возведённых папой римским Каликстом III

          Deduzione

          Mysql.sock missing - “Can't connect to local MySQL server through socket”