Does the subsequent automatic damage from the Witch Bolt spell trigger the necrotic damage from Hex?












3














PC casts hex (PHB, p. 251) on an enemy. Then he casts witch bolt (PHB, p. 259) and succeeds. Next turn, he automatically deals 1d12 lightning damage from witch bolt. Does hex's 1d6 necrotic damage also apply? He didn't roll, but it's still an attack.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Alex Parvan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • Related: rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/71245/what-counts-as-an-attack
    – Carcer
    2 days ago










  • @PeterCordes The website you linked to is illegally reproducing content. Please do not link to these websites. See this meta.
    – doppelgreener
    2 days ago
















3














PC casts hex (PHB, p. 251) on an enemy. Then he casts witch bolt (PHB, p. 259) and succeeds. Next turn, he automatically deals 1d12 lightning damage from witch bolt. Does hex's 1d6 necrotic damage also apply? He didn't roll, but it's still an attack.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Alex Parvan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • Related: rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/71245/what-counts-as-an-attack
    – Carcer
    2 days ago










  • @PeterCordes The website you linked to is illegally reproducing content. Please do not link to these websites. See this meta.
    – doppelgreener
    2 days ago














3












3








3







PC casts hex (PHB, p. 251) on an enemy. Then he casts witch bolt (PHB, p. 259) and succeeds. Next turn, he automatically deals 1d12 lightning damage from witch bolt. Does hex's 1d6 necrotic damage also apply? He didn't roll, but it's still an attack.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Alex Parvan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











PC casts hex (PHB, p. 251) on an enemy. Then he casts witch bolt (PHB, p. 259) and succeeds. Next turn, he automatically deals 1d12 lightning damage from witch bolt. Does hex's 1d6 necrotic damage also apply? He didn't roll, but it's still an attack.







dnd-5e spells






share|improve this question









New contributor




Alex Parvan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Alex Parvan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 days ago









V2Blast

19.8k357123




19.8k357123






New contributor




Alex Parvan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 2 days ago









Alex ParvanAlex Parvan

46727




46727




New contributor




Alex Parvan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Alex Parvan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Alex Parvan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • Related: rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/71245/what-counts-as-an-attack
    – Carcer
    2 days ago










  • @PeterCordes The website you linked to is illegally reproducing content. Please do not link to these websites. See this meta.
    – doppelgreener
    2 days ago


















  • Related: rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/71245/what-counts-as-an-attack
    – Carcer
    2 days ago










  • @PeterCordes The website you linked to is illegally reproducing content. Please do not link to these websites. See this meta.
    – doppelgreener
    2 days ago
















Related: rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/71245/what-counts-as-an-attack
– Carcer
2 days ago




Related: rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/71245/what-counts-as-an-attack
– Carcer
2 days ago












@PeterCordes The website you linked to is illegally reproducing content. Please do not link to these websites. See this meta.
– doppelgreener
2 days ago




@PeterCordes The website you linked to is illegally reproducing content. Please do not link to these websites. See this meta.
– doppelgreener
2 days ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















14














No, Witch Bolt's ongoing damage is not an "attack"



As per the basic rules, there's a simple rule for determining whether or not something is an "attack":




If there's ever any question whether something you're doing counts as an attack, the rule is simple: if you're making an attack roll, you're making an attack.




And Hex is only invoked on attacks that hit:




Until the spell ends, you deal an extra 1d6 necrotic damage to the target whenever you hit it with an attack.




Witch Bolt causes an attack to take place when the spell is first cast - since affecting the creature requires a ranged spell attack roll - but the ongoing damage you can do on subsequent turns as a result is not an attack. It just happens, with no roll required, and the spell's description doesn't call it an attack. Hex would only grant bonus damage once to the initial attack that Witch Bolt makes...



... if it weren't for the fact that Hex and Witch Bolt are both concentration spells, so you can't actually have both active at the same time anyway - as soon as you cast Witch Bolt, Hex would end, unless you somehow have a way to concentrate on two spells at once!



Note that the thematically similar Hexblade's Curse ability, available to Hexblade warlocks, has a different wording:




You gain a bonus to damage rolls against the cursed target.




This ability doesn't require an attack (nor is it a spell which requires concentration) - it simply adds to any damage roll you make against the target. A Hexblade who cast Witch Bolt at such a cursed target would get to deal bonus damage due to the curse both on the initial hit and each subsequent damage roll they made.






share|improve this answer



















  • 1




    Good on you for calling out both issues with Hex and Witch Bolt, the Attack/attack difference, and the fact that both are concentration. It's also really useful that you mentioned how the Hexblade's Curse ability can work with Witch Bolt, since it's not a spell that requires concentration. One mention however: there is the Bestow Curse spell that, if cast with a 5th level spell slot or higher, doesn't require concentration, and so would work with Witch Bolt at the same time (and by extension, Hexblade's Curse).
    – Jay Kay
    2 days ago










  • Is there a corresponding rule that "if you don't make an attack roll, it's not an attack"?
    – Mark Wells
    2 days ago






  • 2




    @MarkWells: The rules describe what constitutes an attack. Certain things, such as grapples and shoves, create exceptions to this by describing themselves as "special melee attacks". But in general, things are not exceptions to the description of attacks Carcer pointed out unless they're explicitly described as such in the rules. There are no secret rules.
    – V2Blast
    2 days ago











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});






Alex Parvan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f138511%2fdoes-the-subsequent-automatic-damage-from-the-witch-bolt-spell-trigger-the-necro%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









14














No, Witch Bolt's ongoing damage is not an "attack"



As per the basic rules, there's a simple rule for determining whether or not something is an "attack":




If there's ever any question whether something you're doing counts as an attack, the rule is simple: if you're making an attack roll, you're making an attack.




And Hex is only invoked on attacks that hit:




Until the spell ends, you deal an extra 1d6 necrotic damage to the target whenever you hit it with an attack.




Witch Bolt causes an attack to take place when the spell is first cast - since affecting the creature requires a ranged spell attack roll - but the ongoing damage you can do on subsequent turns as a result is not an attack. It just happens, with no roll required, and the spell's description doesn't call it an attack. Hex would only grant bonus damage once to the initial attack that Witch Bolt makes...



... if it weren't for the fact that Hex and Witch Bolt are both concentration spells, so you can't actually have both active at the same time anyway - as soon as you cast Witch Bolt, Hex would end, unless you somehow have a way to concentrate on two spells at once!



Note that the thematically similar Hexblade's Curse ability, available to Hexblade warlocks, has a different wording:




You gain a bonus to damage rolls against the cursed target.




This ability doesn't require an attack (nor is it a spell which requires concentration) - it simply adds to any damage roll you make against the target. A Hexblade who cast Witch Bolt at such a cursed target would get to deal bonus damage due to the curse both on the initial hit and each subsequent damage roll they made.






share|improve this answer



















  • 1




    Good on you for calling out both issues with Hex and Witch Bolt, the Attack/attack difference, and the fact that both are concentration. It's also really useful that you mentioned how the Hexblade's Curse ability can work with Witch Bolt, since it's not a spell that requires concentration. One mention however: there is the Bestow Curse spell that, if cast with a 5th level spell slot or higher, doesn't require concentration, and so would work with Witch Bolt at the same time (and by extension, Hexblade's Curse).
    – Jay Kay
    2 days ago










  • Is there a corresponding rule that "if you don't make an attack roll, it's not an attack"?
    – Mark Wells
    2 days ago






  • 2




    @MarkWells: The rules describe what constitutes an attack. Certain things, such as grapples and shoves, create exceptions to this by describing themselves as "special melee attacks". But in general, things are not exceptions to the description of attacks Carcer pointed out unless they're explicitly described as such in the rules. There are no secret rules.
    – V2Blast
    2 days ago
















14














No, Witch Bolt's ongoing damage is not an "attack"



As per the basic rules, there's a simple rule for determining whether or not something is an "attack":




If there's ever any question whether something you're doing counts as an attack, the rule is simple: if you're making an attack roll, you're making an attack.




And Hex is only invoked on attacks that hit:




Until the spell ends, you deal an extra 1d6 necrotic damage to the target whenever you hit it with an attack.




Witch Bolt causes an attack to take place when the spell is first cast - since affecting the creature requires a ranged spell attack roll - but the ongoing damage you can do on subsequent turns as a result is not an attack. It just happens, with no roll required, and the spell's description doesn't call it an attack. Hex would only grant bonus damage once to the initial attack that Witch Bolt makes...



... if it weren't for the fact that Hex and Witch Bolt are both concentration spells, so you can't actually have both active at the same time anyway - as soon as you cast Witch Bolt, Hex would end, unless you somehow have a way to concentrate on two spells at once!



Note that the thematically similar Hexblade's Curse ability, available to Hexblade warlocks, has a different wording:




You gain a bonus to damage rolls against the cursed target.




This ability doesn't require an attack (nor is it a spell which requires concentration) - it simply adds to any damage roll you make against the target. A Hexblade who cast Witch Bolt at such a cursed target would get to deal bonus damage due to the curse both on the initial hit and each subsequent damage roll they made.






share|improve this answer



















  • 1




    Good on you for calling out both issues with Hex and Witch Bolt, the Attack/attack difference, and the fact that both are concentration. It's also really useful that you mentioned how the Hexblade's Curse ability can work with Witch Bolt, since it's not a spell that requires concentration. One mention however: there is the Bestow Curse spell that, if cast with a 5th level spell slot or higher, doesn't require concentration, and so would work with Witch Bolt at the same time (and by extension, Hexblade's Curse).
    – Jay Kay
    2 days ago










  • Is there a corresponding rule that "if you don't make an attack roll, it's not an attack"?
    – Mark Wells
    2 days ago






  • 2




    @MarkWells: The rules describe what constitutes an attack. Certain things, such as grapples and shoves, create exceptions to this by describing themselves as "special melee attacks". But in general, things are not exceptions to the description of attacks Carcer pointed out unless they're explicitly described as such in the rules. There are no secret rules.
    – V2Blast
    2 days ago














14












14








14






No, Witch Bolt's ongoing damage is not an "attack"



As per the basic rules, there's a simple rule for determining whether or not something is an "attack":




If there's ever any question whether something you're doing counts as an attack, the rule is simple: if you're making an attack roll, you're making an attack.




And Hex is only invoked on attacks that hit:




Until the spell ends, you deal an extra 1d6 necrotic damage to the target whenever you hit it with an attack.




Witch Bolt causes an attack to take place when the spell is first cast - since affecting the creature requires a ranged spell attack roll - but the ongoing damage you can do on subsequent turns as a result is not an attack. It just happens, with no roll required, and the spell's description doesn't call it an attack. Hex would only grant bonus damage once to the initial attack that Witch Bolt makes...



... if it weren't for the fact that Hex and Witch Bolt are both concentration spells, so you can't actually have both active at the same time anyway - as soon as you cast Witch Bolt, Hex would end, unless you somehow have a way to concentrate on two spells at once!



Note that the thematically similar Hexblade's Curse ability, available to Hexblade warlocks, has a different wording:




You gain a bonus to damage rolls against the cursed target.




This ability doesn't require an attack (nor is it a spell which requires concentration) - it simply adds to any damage roll you make against the target. A Hexblade who cast Witch Bolt at such a cursed target would get to deal bonus damage due to the curse both on the initial hit and each subsequent damage roll they made.






share|improve this answer














No, Witch Bolt's ongoing damage is not an "attack"



As per the basic rules, there's a simple rule for determining whether or not something is an "attack":




If there's ever any question whether something you're doing counts as an attack, the rule is simple: if you're making an attack roll, you're making an attack.




And Hex is only invoked on attacks that hit:




Until the spell ends, you deal an extra 1d6 necrotic damage to the target whenever you hit it with an attack.




Witch Bolt causes an attack to take place when the spell is first cast - since affecting the creature requires a ranged spell attack roll - but the ongoing damage you can do on subsequent turns as a result is not an attack. It just happens, with no roll required, and the spell's description doesn't call it an attack. Hex would only grant bonus damage once to the initial attack that Witch Bolt makes...



... if it weren't for the fact that Hex and Witch Bolt are both concentration spells, so you can't actually have both active at the same time anyway - as soon as you cast Witch Bolt, Hex would end, unless you somehow have a way to concentrate on two spells at once!



Note that the thematically similar Hexblade's Curse ability, available to Hexblade warlocks, has a different wording:




You gain a bonus to damage rolls against the cursed target.




This ability doesn't require an attack (nor is it a spell which requires concentration) - it simply adds to any damage roll you make against the target. A Hexblade who cast Witch Bolt at such a cursed target would get to deal bonus damage due to the curse both on the initial hit and each subsequent damage roll they made.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 2 days ago

























answered 2 days ago









CarcerCarcer

22.5k466123




22.5k466123








  • 1




    Good on you for calling out both issues with Hex and Witch Bolt, the Attack/attack difference, and the fact that both are concentration. It's also really useful that you mentioned how the Hexblade's Curse ability can work with Witch Bolt, since it's not a spell that requires concentration. One mention however: there is the Bestow Curse spell that, if cast with a 5th level spell slot or higher, doesn't require concentration, and so would work with Witch Bolt at the same time (and by extension, Hexblade's Curse).
    – Jay Kay
    2 days ago










  • Is there a corresponding rule that "if you don't make an attack roll, it's not an attack"?
    – Mark Wells
    2 days ago






  • 2




    @MarkWells: The rules describe what constitutes an attack. Certain things, such as grapples and shoves, create exceptions to this by describing themselves as "special melee attacks". But in general, things are not exceptions to the description of attacks Carcer pointed out unless they're explicitly described as such in the rules. There are no secret rules.
    – V2Blast
    2 days ago














  • 1




    Good on you for calling out both issues with Hex and Witch Bolt, the Attack/attack difference, and the fact that both are concentration. It's also really useful that you mentioned how the Hexblade's Curse ability can work with Witch Bolt, since it's not a spell that requires concentration. One mention however: there is the Bestow Curse spell that, if cast with a 5th level spell slot or higher, doesn't require concentration, and so would work with Witch Bolt at the same time (and by extension, Hexblade's Curse).
    – Jay Kay
    2 days ago










  • Is there a corresponding rule that "if you don't make an attack roll, it's not an attack"?
    – Mark Wells
    2 days ago






  • 2




    @MarkWells: The rules describe what constitutes an attack. Certain things, such as grapples and shoves, create exceptions to this by describing themselves as "special melee attacks". But in general, things are not exceptions to the description of attacks Carcer pointed out unless they're explicitly described as such in the rules. There are no secret rules.
    – V2Blast
    2 days ago








1




1




Good on you for calling out both issues with Hex and Witch Bolt, the Attack/attack difference, and the fact that both are concentration. It's also really useful that you mentioned how the Hexblade's Curse ability can work with Witch Bolt, since it's not a spell that requires concentration. One mention however: there is the Bestow Curse spell that, if cast with a 5th level spell slot or higher, doesn't require concentration, and so would work with Witch Bolt at the same time (and by extension, Hexblade's Curse).
– Jay Kay
2 days ago




Good on you for calling out both issues with Hex and Witch Bolt, the Attack/attack difference, and the fact that both are concentration. It's also really useful that you mentioned how the Hexblade's Curse ability can work with Witch Bolt, since it's not a spell that requires concentration. One mention however: there is the Bestow Curse spell that, if cast with a 5th level spell slot or higher, doesn't require concentration, and so would work with Witch Bolt at the same time (and by extension, Hexblade's Curse).
– Jay Kay
2 days ago












Is there a corresponding rule that "if you don't make an attack roll, it's not an attack"?
– Mark Wells
2 days ago




Is there a corresponding rule that "if you don't make an attack roll, it's not an attack"?
– Mark Wells
2 days ago




2




2




@MarkWells: The rules describe what constitutes an attack. Certain things, such as grapples and shoves, create exceptions to this by describing themselves as "special melee attacks". But in general, things are not exceptions to the description of attacks Carcer pointed out unless they're explicitly described as such in the rules. There are no secret rules.
– V2Blast
2 days ago




@MarkWells: The rules describe what constitutes an attack. Certain things, such as grapples and shoves, create exceptions to this by describing themselves as "special melee attacks". But in general, things are not exceptions to the description of attacks Carcer pointed out unless they're explicitly described as such in the rules. There are no secret rules.
– V2Blast
2 days ago










Alex Parvan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















Alex Parvan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













Alex Parvan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












Alex Parvan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f138511%2fdoes-the-subsequent-automatic-damage-from-the-witch-bolt-spell-trigger-the-necro%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Список кардиналов, возведённых папой римским Каликстом III

Deduzione

Mysql.sock missing - “Can't connect to local MySQL server through socket”