Can any creature other than PCs use Two-Weapon Fighting?












22














The rule on Two-Weapon Fighting (PHB, page 195) states:




When you take the Attack action and attack with a light melee weapon that you're holding in one hand, you can use a bonus action to attack with a different light melee weapon that you're holding in the other hand. You don't add your ability modifier to the damage of the bonus attack, unless that modifier is negative.



If either weapon has the thrown property, you can throw the weapon, instead of making a melee attack with it.




Now, let's take for example a drow (MM, page 128).



Under its Actions, it can use a shortsword, which is a light melee weapon. Should said drow find itself wielding a second shortsword, would it be able to use Two-Weapon Fighting within the normal limitations of the feature?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Emmanuel Acosta is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

























    22














    The rule on Two-Weapon Fighting (PHB, page 195) states:




    When you take the Attack action and attack with a light melee weapon that you're holding in one hand, you can use a bonus action to attack with a different light melee weapon that you're holding in the other hand. You don't add your ability modifier to the damage of the bonus attack, unless that modifier is negative.



    If either weapon has the thrown property, you can throw the weapon, instead of making a melee attack with it.




    Now, let's take for example a drow (MM, page 128).



    Under its Actions, it can use a shortsword, which is a light melee weapon. Should said drow find itself wielding a second shortsword, would it be able to use Two-Weapon Fighting within the normal limitations of the feature?










    share|improve this question









    New contributor




    Emmanuel Acosta is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.























      22












      22








      22







      The rule on Two-Weapon Fighting (PHB, page 195) states:




      When you take the Attack action and attack with a light melee weapon that you're holding in one hand, you can use a bonus action to attack with a different light melee weapon that you're holding in the other hand. You don't add your ability modifier to the damage of the bonus attack, unless that modifier is negative.



      If either weapon has the thrown property, you can throw the weapon, instead of making a melee attack with it.




      Now, let's take for example a drow (MM, page 128).



      Under its Actions, it can use a shortsword, which is a light melee weapon. Should said drow find itself wielding a second shortsword, would it be able to use Two-Weapon Fighting within the normal limitations of the feature?










      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      Emmanuel Acosta is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      The rule on Two-Weapon Fighting (PHB, page 195) states:




      When you take the Attack action and attack with a light melee weapon that you're holding in one hand, you can use a bonus action to attack with a different light melee weapon that you're holding in the other hand. You don't add your ability modifier to the damage of the bonus attack, unless that modifier is negative.



      If either weapon has the thrown property, you can throw the weapon, instead of making a melee attack with it.




      Now, let's take for example a drow (MM, page 128).



      Under its Actions, it can use a shortsword, which is a light melee weapon. Should said drow find itself wielding a second shortsword, would it be able to use Two-Weapon Fighting within the normal limitations of the feature?







      dnd-5e monsters npc






      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      Emmanuel Acosta is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      Emmanuel Acosta is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 2 days ago









      V2Blast

      19.7k356121




      19.7k356121






      New contributor




      Emmanuel Acosta is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked Jan 2 at 16:16









      Emmanuel Acosta

      1114




      1114




      New contributor




      Emmanuel Acosta is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Emmanuel Acosta is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Emmanuel Acosta is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          32














          Yes, if you want it to be able to



          NPCs in D&D 5e are designed differently from, and often do not follow the same rules as, the player characters - but in this case the same rules should apply. The guidance for reading monster stat blocks states:




          When a monster takes its action, it can choose from the options in the Actions section of its stat block or use one of the actions available to all creatures, such as the Dash or Hide action.




          By a strict reading, the weapon attack options described in the monster's stat block are not uses of the Attack action - they're special actions that the monster can use, so if it uses one of those actions it's not taking the Attack action and so can't qualify for two-weapon fighting. (Functionally, these options are usually equivalent to taking the Attack action and making an attack with that weapon, and in most cases I'd personally rule as if they were the Attack action for situations where that's relevant, but that's not the rules as written.)



          However, the monster explicitly retains the ability to use actions which are available to all creatures - including the Attack action - so it can take that action and make an attack with a weapon it's holding and then invoke two-weapon fighting just like a PC can.



          Where things get a bit funky is when the Multiattack action is in play. A monster with Multiattack can make several attacks with a single action - which is much the same as a player character using the Attack action with the Extra Attack feature - but it is not the Attack action, so a monster that uses Multiattack cannot use those attacks to qualify for a two-weapon-fighting bonus action attack. A monster with Multiattack is probably better off using that than trying to use the two-weapon fighting rules though, since its Multiattack almost certainly has better stats and doesn't use up a bonus action.






          share|improve this answer



















          • 5




            MM p. 10 specifically calls out named monster actions as Actions, so the natural reading of the rules is that they are attacking using custom-named Actions, not the Attack action. This answer’s logic still works regardless of that , and I’d like to upvote it, but the bit about reading monster Actions as being already secretly the Attack action means I can’t bring myself to.
            – SevenSidedDie
            Jan 2 at 17:12












          • @SevenSidedDie fair enough - I've edited to clarify that my interpretation isn't strictly RAW on that particular issue.
            – Carcer
            Jan 2 at 17:34






          • 4




            That works for me! I like how what is and what’s sensible to rule are distinguished. (And the reason for personally ruling that way is clear and makes good sense, now that I consider it separately.)
            – SevenSidedDie
            Jan 2 at 17:38



















          10














          Yes.



          Two-weapon fighting rules apply to monsters per the MM's guidance on monsters and what actions they can take.




          When a monster takes its action, it can choose from...one of the actions available to all creatures...as described in the Player's Handbook. (MM page 10.)




          Further guidance on the next page of the MM specifically references the attack section of the PHB which contains the rules for Two Weapon Fighting.






          share|improve this answer



















          • 5




            Being able to use TWF isn't strictly the same as Mulitattack - Multiattack is a single action whereas TWF requires expending a bonus action to get the extra attack, which has implications for their action economy. (Possibly functionally irrelevant implications in many cases, I do concede.)
            – Carcer
            Jan 2 at 16:34










          • So it seems that Multiattack, though similar to TWF, is distinct from TWF and that TWF is usable by any creature that fulfils the pre-reqs, (bonus action, both weapons light, etc.) Any edit to make?
            – Token
            Jan 2 at 16:40












          • Changed supporting information from the previously mentioned and unrelated Multiattack to the answers current state.
            – Token
            Jan 2 at 17:49










          • I think it was a worthwhile note in the original version that allowing a monster to TWF does make it more dangerous and could potentially justify increasing its CR (though a TWF attack with a mundane light weapon would only be a few points of damage, with is within the margin of tolerance for offensive CR calculation in most cases).
            – Carcer
            Jan 2 at 17:52








          • 2




            I also originally thought it was worthwhile, but considered that: If TWF was already available to every creature as indicated, then it should probably have been taken into account when calculating CR. It doesn't make creatures more dangerous, because they already were that dangerous.
            – Token
            Jan 2 at 18:00



















          4














          Yes, in the example given



          The Drow you mention can take advantage of the two-weapon fighting rule if it has two short swords.




          When a monster takes its action, it can choose from the options in the
          Actions section of its stat block or use one of the actions available
          to all creatures, such as the Dash or Hide action, as described in the
          Player's Handbook (MM p.10).




          You quoted the two-weapon fighting text; let's check its requirements:




          1. Yes, the Drow takes the Attack action

          2. Yes, the Drow's attack uses a Light Melee Weapon

          3. Yes, if you modified the Drow by giving it a second short sword, then it has an another Light Melee Weapon in its other hand


          There you have it; the Drow can get a second attack if he has a second shortsword.



          NOTE: The attack action lets you draw one weapon as part of the action. If your Drow starts his turn empty-handed, he'll still get only one attack on that turn. He can draw (and use) the second short sword as part of his attack on his next turn.



          ALSO NOTE: If you want to be cheesy, a Drow would be complying with the rules if he grabbed a short sword off the ground (as an "Interact with an object"), then drew a second short sword as part of an attack action. For a CR 1/4 mook, this Drow is getting really industrious.



          This might affect the Drow's CR



          The CR 1/4 Drow stat block (Monster Manual p.128) lists actions for a typical Drow-on-the-street. This stat block implies that, given the nature of Drow society, an average non-soldier Drow will have chain mail, one shortsword, and one hand crossbow.



          That being said, as GM, you can modify a Drow by giving it an extra short sword. For that matter, you can also change its armor or change any of its equipment. You can even declare that an enclave of Drow are all infused with demon blood that lets them shoot lasers from their eyes. The stat block is just a time-saving summary; it shows a typical specimen so you don't have to calculate combat stats for every monster the party encounters.




          Feel free to tweak an existing creature to make it into something more
          useful for you... Keep in mind that modifying a monster, including
          when you apply a template to it, might change its challenge rating (MM
          p.6).




          Consult the Dungeon Master's Guide to figure out whether a change affects a monster's CR.



          This is mostly limited to Low-CR Humanoids



          Non-humanoids tend to use natural attacks, while high-CR creatures tend to use Multiattack, neither of which works with Two-Weapon Fighting.



          Two weapon fighting does NOT work with natural attacks (claws, fangs, etc.)



          The two-weapon fighting rule requires the creature to attack with a light weapon and to be holding a light weapon in its other hand. Most natural attacks are listed as a "melee weapon attack", but that's just to distinguish them from "melee spell attacks". Claws, fangs, tentacles, etc. are NOT an attack with a weapon, let alone a light weapon.



          Two weapon fighting does NOT work with Multiattack



          The two-weapon fighting rule lets you make an extra attack as a bonus action when you take the attack action.



          Multiattack is its own action. A creature using Multiattack is NOT taking the attack action; rather, it's choosing the "Multiattack" action listed in its stat block.



          Monsters that swing multiple weapons or that swing a weapon multiple times do so by listing "Multiattack" in their stat block. Again, a stat block is a summary of how a monster operates in combat.



          For example, a Marilith has six arms (and a tail). On her turn, she can draw and attack with six swords (and her tail). Why? Because she has a Multiattack action that says so. She isn't using the fighter's Extra Attack ability or Two-Weapon Fighting or the Dual Wielding feet. The stat block summarizes her training and her demonic nature into the fact we actually care about: She attacks with all six swords (and her tail).



          The Bottom Line



          Stat blocks are a summary of what a typical specimen of a monster can do. They're a convenience; planning an adventure is hard enough without the GM having to figure out every equipment permutation on every villainous minion a party might encounter.



          Any creature capable of holding two light weapons is capable of swinging both light weapons. This fact is accounted for on stat blocks by two things:



          Low-CR mooks are limited to possessing the weapons on their stat block because weapons cost money. Joe McPeasant doesn't get two short swords for the same reason that he doesn't get a suit of plate mail.



          Creatures that are actually GOOD at swinging multiple weapons and that tend to POSSESS multiple weapons generally say "Multiattack: [attacks with both of its weapons]" in their stat block.






          share|improve this answer























            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "122"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });






            Emmanuel Acosta is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f138309%2fcan-any-creature-other-than-pcs-use-two-weapon-fighting%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes








            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            32














            Yes, if you want it to be able to



            NPCs in D&D 5e are designed differently from, and often do not follow the same rules as, the player characters - but in this case the same rules should apply. The guidance for reading monster stat blocks states:




            When a monster takes its action, it can choose from the options in the Actions section of its stat block or use one of the actions available to all creatures, such as the Dash or Hide action.




            By a strict reading, the weapon attack options described in the monster's stat block are not uses of the Attack action - they're special actions that the monster can use, so if it uses one of those actions it's not taking the Attack action and so can't qualify for two-weapon fighting. (Functionally, these options are usually equivalent to taking the Attack action and making an attack with that weapon, and in most cases I'd personally rule as if they were the Attack action for situations where that's relevant, but that's not the rules as written.)



            However, the monster explicitly retains the ability to use actions which are available to all creatures - including the Attack action - so it can take that action and make an attack with a weapon it's holding and then invoke two-weapon fighting just like a PC can.



            Where things get a bit funky is when the Multiattack action is in play. A monster with Multiattack can make several attacks with a single action - which is much the same as a player character using the Attack action with the Extra Attack feature - but it is not the Attack action, so a monster that uses Multiattack cannot use those attacks to qualify for a two-weapon-fighting bonus action attack. A monster with Multiattack is probably better off using that than trying to use the two-weapon fighting rules though, since its Multiattack almost certainly has better stats and doesn't use up a bonus action.






            share|improve this answer



















            • 5




              MM p. 10 specifically calls out named monster actions as Actions, so the natural reading of the rules is that they are attacking using custom-named Actions, not the Attack action. This answer’s logic still works regardless of that , and I’d like to upvote it, but the bit about reading monster Actions as being already secretly the Attack action means I can’t bring myself to.
              – SevenSidedDie
              Jan 2 at 17:12












            • @SevenSidedDie fair enough - I've edited to clarify that my interpretation isn't strictly RAW on that particular issue.
              – Carcer
              Jan 2 at 17:34






            • 4




              That works for me! I like how what is and what’s sensible to rule are distinguished. (And the reason for personally ruling that way is clear and makes good sense, now that I consider it separately.)
              – SevenSidedDie
              Jan 2 at 17:38
















            32














            Yes, if you want it to be able to



            NPCs in D&D 5e are designed differently from, and often do not follow the same rules as, the player characters - but in this case the same rules should apply. The guidance for reading monster stat blocks states:




            When a monster takes its action, it can choose from the options in the Actions section of its stat block or use one of the actions available to all creatures, such as the Dash or Hide action.




            By a strict reading, the weapon attack options described in the monster's stat block are not uses of the Attack action - they're special actions that the monster can use, so if it uses one of those actions it's not taking the Attack action and so can't qualify for two-weapon fighting. (Functionally, these options are usually equivalent to taking the Attack action and making an attack with that weapon, and in most cases I'd personally rule as if they were the Attack action for situations where that's relevant, but that's not the rules as written.)



            However, the monster explicitly retains the ability to use actions which are available to all creatures - including the Attack action - so it can take that action and make an attack with a weapon it's holding and then invoke two-weapon fighting just like a PC can.



            Where things get a bit funky is when the Multiattack action is in play. A monster with Multiattack can make several attacks with a single action - which is much the same as a player character using the Attack action with the Extra Attack feature - but it is not the Attack action, so a monster that uses Multiattack cannot use those attacks to qualify for a two-weapon-fighting bonus action attack. A monster with Multiattack is probably better off using that than trying to use the two-weapon fighting rules though, since its Multiattack almost certainly has better stats and doesn't use up a bonus action.






            share|improve this answer



















            • 5




              MM p. 10 specifically calls out named monster actions as Actions, so the natural reading of the rules is that they are attacking using custom-named Actions, not the Attack action. This answer’s logic still works regardless of that , and I’d like to upvote it, but the bit about reading monster Actions as being already secretly the Attack action means I can’t bring myself to.
              – SevenSidedDie
              Jan 2 at 17:12












            • @SevenSidedDie fair enough - I've edited to clarify that my interpretation isn't strictly RAW on that particular issue.
              – Carcer
              Jan 2 at 17:34






            • 4




              That works for me! I like how what is and what’s sensible to rule are distinguished. (And the reason for personally ruling that way is clear and makes good sense, now that I consider it separately.)
              – SevenSidedDie
              Jan 2 at 17:38














            32












            32








            32






            Yes, if you want it to be able to



            NPCs in D&D 5e are designed differently from, and often do not follow the same rules as, the player characters - but in this case the same rules should apply. The guidance for reading monster stat blocks states:




            When a monster takes its action, it can choose from the options in the Actions section of its stat block or use one of the actions available to all creatures, such as the Dash or Hide action.




            By a strict reading, the weapon attack options described in the monster's stat block are not uses of the Attack action - they're special actions that the monster can use, so if it uses one of those actions it's not taking the Attack action and so can't qualify for two-weapon fighting. (Functionally, these options are usually equivalent to taking the Attack action and making an attack with that weapon, and in most cases I'd personally rule as if they were the Attack action for situations where that's relevant, but that's not the rules as written.)



            However, the monster explicitly retains the ability to use actions which are available to all creatures - including the Attack action - so it can take that action and make an attack with a weapon it's holding and then invoke two-weapon fighting just like a PC can.



            Where things get a bit funky is when the Multiattack action is in play. A monster with Multiattack can make several attacks with a single action - which is much the same as a player character using the Attack action with the Extra Attack feature - but it is not the Attack action, so a monster that uses Multiattack cannot use those attacks to qualify for a two-weapon-fighting bonus action attack. A monster with Multiattack is probably better off using that than trying to use the two-weapon fighting rules though, since its Multiattack almost certainly has better stats and doesn't use up a bonus action.






            share|improve this answer














            Yes, if you want it to be able to



            NPCs in D&D 5e are designed differently from, and often do not follow the same rules as, the player characters - but in this case the same rules should apply. The guidance for reading monster stat blocks states:




            When a monster takes its action, it can choose from the options in the Actions section of its stat block or use one of the actions available to all creatures, such as the Dash or Hide action.




            By a strict reading, the weapon attack options described in the monster's stat block are not uses of the Attack action - they're special actions that the monster can use, so if it uses one of those actions it's not taking the Attack action and so can't qualify for two-weapon fighting. (Functionally, these options are usually equivalent to taking the Attack action and making an attack with that weapon, and in most cases I'd personally rule as if they were the Attack action for situations where that's relevant, but that's not the rules as written.)



            However, the monster explicitly retains the ability to use actions which are available to all creatures - including the Attack action - so it can take that action and make an attack with a weapon it's holding and then invoke two-weapon fighting just like a PC can.



            Where things get a bit funky is when the Multiattack action is in play. A monster with Multiattack can make several attacks with a single action - which is much the same as a player character using the Attack action with the Extra Attack feature - but it is not the Attack action, so a monster that uses Multiattack cannot use those attacks to qualify for a two-weapon-fighting bonus action attack. A monster with Multiattack is probably better off using that than trying to use the two-weapon fighting rules though, since its Multiattack almost certainly has better stats and doesn't use up a bonus action.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Jan 2 at 18:09









            GreySage

            13.9k44992




            13.9k44992










            answered Jan 2 at 16:51









            Carcer

            22.4k466123




            22.4k466123








            • 5




              MM p. 10 specifically calls out named monster actions as Actions, so the natural reading of the rules is that they are attacking using custom-named Actions, not the Attack action. This answer’s logic still works regardless of that , and I’d like to upvote it, but the bit about reading monster Actions as being already secretly the Attack action means I can’t bring myself to.
              – SevenSidedDie
              Jan 2 at 17:12












            • @SevenSidedDie fair enough - I've edited to clarify that my interpretation isn't strictly RAW on that particular issue.
              – Carcer
              Jan 2 at 17:34






            • 4




              That works for me! I like how what is and what’s sensible to rule are distinguished. (And the reason for personally ruling that way is clear and makes good sense, now that I consider it separately.)
              – SevenSidedDie
              Jan 2 at 17:38














            • 5




              MM p. 10 specifically calls out named monster actions as Actions, so the natural reading of the rules is that they are attacking using custom-named Actions, not the Attack action. This answer’s logic still works regardless of that , and I’d like to upvote it, but the bit about reading monster Actions as being already secretly the Attack action means I can’t bring myself to.
              – SevenSidedDie
              Jan 2 at 17:12












            • @SevenSidedDie fair enough - I've edited to clarify that my interpretation isn't strictly RAW on that particular issue.
              – Carcer
              Jan 2 at 17:34






            • 4




              That works for me! I like how what is and what’s sensible to rule are distinguished. (And the reason for personally ruling that way is clear and makes good sense, now that I consider it separately.)
              – SevenSidedDie
              Jan 2 at 17:38








            5




            5




            MM p. 10 specifically calls out named monster actions as Actions, so the natural reading of the rules is that they are attacking using custom-named Actions, not the Attack action. This answer’s logic still works regardless of that , and I’d like to upvote it, but the bit about reading monster Actions as being already secretly the Attack action means I can’t bring myself to.
            – SevenSidedDie
            Jan 2 at 17:12






            MM p. 10 specifically calls out named monster actions as Actions, so the natural reading of the rules is that they are attacking using custom-named Actions, not the Attack action. This answer’s logic still works regardless of that , and I’d like to upvote it, but the bit about reading monster Actions as being already secretly the Attack action means I can’t bring myself to.
            – SevenSidedDie
            Jan 2 at 17:12














            @SevenSidedDie fair enough - I've edited to clarify that my interpretation isn't strictly RAW on that particular issue.
            – Carcer
            Jan 2 at 17:34




            @SevenSidedDie fair enough - I've edited to clarify that my interpretation isn't strictly RAW on that particular issue.
            – Carcer
            Jan 2 at 17:34




            4




            4




            That works for me! I like how what is and what’s sensible to rule are distinguished. (And the reason for personally ruling that way is clear and makes good sense, now that I consider it separately.)
            – SevenSidedDie
            Jan 2 at 17:38




            That works for me! I like how what is and what’s sensible to rule are distinguished. (And the reason for personally ruling that way is clear and makes good sense, now that I consider it separately.)
            – SevenSidedDie
            Jan 2 at 17:38













            10














            Yes.



            Two-weapon fighting rules apply to monsters per the MM's guidance on monsters and what actions they can take.




            When a monster takes its action, it can choose from...one of the actions available to all creatures...as described in the Player's Handbook. (MM page 10.)




            Further guidance on the next page of the MM specifically references the attack section of the PHB which contains the rules for Two Weapon Fighting.






            share|improve this answer



















            • 5




              Being able to use TWF isn't strictly the same as Mulitattack - Multiattack is a single action whereas TWF requires expending a bonus action to get the extra attack, which has implications for their action economy. (Possibly functionally irrelevant implications in many cases, I do concede.)
              – Carcer
              Jan 2 at 16:34










            • So it seems that Multiattack, though similar to TWF, is distinct from TWF and that TWF is usable by any creature that fulfils the pre-reqs, (bonus action, both weapons light, etc.) Any edit to make?
              – Token
              Jan 2 at 16:40












            • Changed supporting information from the previously mentioned and unrelated Multiattack to the answers current state.
              – Token
              Jan 2 at 17:49










            • I think it was a worthwhile note in the original version that allowing a monster to TWF does make it more dangerous and could potentially justify increasing its CR (though a TWF attack with a mundane light weapon would only be a few points of damage, with is within the margin of tolerance for offensive CR calculation in most cases).
              – Carcer
              Jan 2 at 17:52








            • 2




              I also originally thought it was worthwhile, but considered that: If TWF was already available to every creature as indicated, then it should probably have been taken into account when calculating CR. It doesn't make creatures more dangerous, because they already were that dangerous.
              – Token
              Jan 2 at 18:00
















            10














            Yes.



            Two-weapon fighting rules apply to monsters per the MM's guidance on monsters and what actions they can take.




            When a monster takes its action, it can choose from...one of the actions available to all creatures...as described in the Player's Handbook. (MM page 10.)




            Further guidance on the next page of the MM specifically references the attack section of the PHB which contains the rules for Two Weapon Fighting.






            share|improve this answer



















            • 5




              Being able to use TWF isn't strictly the same as Mulitattack - Multiattack is a single action whereas TWF requires expending a bonus action to get the extra attack, which has implications for their action economy. (Possibly functionally irrelevant implications in many cases, I do concede.)
              – Carcer
              Jan 2 at 16:34










            • So it seems that Multiattack, though similar to TWF, is distinct from TWF and that TWF is usable by any creature that fulfils the pre-reqs, (bonus action, both weapons light, etc.) Any edit to make?
              – Token
              Jan 2 at 16:40












            • Changed supporting information from the previously mentioned and unrelated Multiattack to the answers current state.
              – Token
              Jan 2 at 17:49










            • I think it was a worthwhile note in the original version that allowing a monster to TWF does make it more dangerous and could potentially justify increasing its CR (though a TWF attack with a mundane light weapon would only be a few points of damage, with is within the margin of tolerance for offensive CR calculation in most cases).
              – Carcer
              Jan 2 at 17:52








            • 2




              I also originally thought it was worthwhile, but considered that: If TWF was already available to every creature as indicated, then it should probably have been taken into account when calculating CR. It doesn't make creatures more dangerous, because they already were that dangerous.
              – Token
              Jan 2 at 18:00














            10












            10








            10






            Yes.



            Two-weapon fighting rules apply to monsters per the MM's guidance on monsters and what actions they can take.




            When a monster takes its action, it can choose from...one of the actions available to all creatures...as described in the Player's Handbook. (MM page 10.)




            Further guidance on the next page of the MM specifically references the attack section of the PHB which contains the rules for Two Weapon Fighting.






            share|improve this answer














            Yes.



            Two-weapon fighting rules apply to monsters per the MM's guidance on monsters and what actions they can take.




            When a monster takes its action, it can choose from...one of the actions available to all creatures...as described in the Player's Handbook. (MM page 10.)




            Further guidance on the next page of the MM specifically references the attack section of the PHB which contains the rules for Two Weapon Fighting.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Jan 2 at 19:07









            Rubiksmoose

            48.6k6241368




            48.6k6241368










            answered Jan 2 at 16:29









            Token

            4567




            4567








            • 5




              Being able to use TWF isn't strictly the same as Mulitattack - Multiattack is a single action whereas TWF requires expending a bonus action to get the extra attack, which has implications for their action economy. (Possibly functionally irrelevant implications in many cases, I do concede.)
              – Carcer
              Jan 2 at 16:34










            • So it seems that Multiattack, though similar to TWF, is distinct from TWF and that TWF is usable by any creature that fulfils the pre-reqs, (bonus action, both weapons light, etc.) Any edit to make?
              – Token
              Jan 2 at 16:40












            • Changed supporting information from the previously mentioned and unrelated Multiattack to the answers current state.
              – Token
              Jan 2 at 17:49










            • I think it was a worthwhile note in the original version that allowing a monster to TWF does make it more dangerous and could potentially justify increasing its CR (though a TWF attack with a mundane light weapon would only be a few points of damage, with is within the margin of tolerance for offensive CR calculation in most cases).
              – Carcer
              Jan 2 at 17:52








            • 2




              I also originally thought it was worthwhile, but considered that: If TWF was already available to every creature as indicated, then it should probably have been taken into account when calculating CR. It doesn't make creatures more dangerous, because they already were that dangerous.
              – Token
              Jan 2 at 18:00














            • 5




              Being able to use TWF isn't strictly the same as Mulitattack - Multiattack is a single action whereas TWF requires expending a bonus action to get the extra attack, which has implications for their action economy. (Possibly functionally irrelevant implications in many cases, I do concede.)
              – Carcer
              Jan 2 at 16:34










            • So it seems that Multiattack, though similar to TWF, is distinct from TWF and that TWF is usable by any creature that fulfils the pre-reqs, (bonus action, both weapons light, etc.) Any edit to make?
              – Token
              Jan 2 at 16:40












            • Changed supporting information from the previously mentioned and unrelated Multiattack to the answers current state.
              – Token
              Jan 2 at 17:49










            • I think it was a worthwhile note in the original version that allowing a monster to TWF does make it more dangerous and could potentially justify increasing its CR (though a TWF attack with a mundane light weapon would only be a few points of damage, with is within the margin of tolerance for offensive CR calculation in most cases).
              – Carcer
              Jan 2 at 17:52








            • 2




              I also originally thought it was worthwhile, but considered that: If TWF was already available to every creature as indicated, then it should probably have been taken into account when calculating CR. It doesn't make creatures more dangerous, because they already were that dangerous.
              – Token
              Jan 2 at 18:00








            5




            5




            Being able to use TWF isn't strictly the same as Mulitattack - Multiattack is a single action whereas TWF requires expending a bonus action to get the extra attack, which has implications for their action economy. (Possibly functionally irrelevant implications in many cases, I do concede.)
            – Carcer
            Jan 2 at 16:34




            Being able to use TWF isn't strictly the same as Mulitattack - Multiattack is a single action whereas TWF requires expending a bonus action to get the extra attack, which has implications for their action economy. (Possibly functionally irrelevant implications in many cases, I do concede.)
            – Carcer
            Jan 2 at 16:34












            So it seems that Multiattack, though similar to TWF, is distinct from TWF and that TWF is usable by any creature that fulfils the pre-reqs, (bonus action, both weapons light, etc.) Any edit to make?
            – Token
            Jan 2 at 16:40






            So it seems that Multiattack, though similar to TWF, is distinct from TWF and that TWF is usable by any creature that fulfils the pre-reqs, (bonus action, both weapons light, etc.) Any edit to make?
            – Token
            Jan 2 at 16:40














            Changed supporting information from the previously mentioned and unrelated Multiattack to the answers current state.
            – Token
            Jan 2 at 17:49




            Changed supporting information from the previously mentioned and unrelated Multiattack to the answers current state.
            – Token
            Jan 2 at 17:49












            I think it was a worthwhile note in the original version that allowing a monster to TWF does make it more dangerous and could potentially justify increasing its CR (though a TWF attack with a mundane light weapon would only be a few points of damage, with is within the margin of tolerance for offensive CR calculation in most cases).
            – Carcer
            Jan 2 at 17:52






            I think it was a worthwhile note in the original version that allowing a monster to TWF does make it more dangerous and could potentially justify increasing its CR (though a TWF attack with a mundane light weapon would only be a few points of damage, with is within the margin of tolerance for offensive CR calculation in most cases).
            – Carcer
            Jan 2 at 17:52






            2




            2




            I also originally thought it was worthwhile, but considered that: If TWF was already available to every creature as indicated, then it should probably have been taken into account when calculating CR. It doesn't make creatures more dangerous, because they already were that dangerous.
            – Token
            Jan 2 at 18:00




            I also originally thought it was worthwhile, but considered that: If TWF was already available to every creature as indicated, then it should probably have been taken into account when calculating CR. It doesn't make creatures more dangerous, because they already were that dangerous.
            – Token
            Jan 2 at 18:00











            4














            Yes, in the example given



            The Drow you mention can take advantage of the two-weapon fighting rule if it has two short swords.




            When a monster takes its action, it can choose from the options in the
            Actions section of its stat block or use one of the actions available
            to all creatures, such as the Dash or Hide action, as described in the
            Player's Handbook (MM p.10).




            You quoted the two-weapon fighting text; let's check its requirements:




            1. Yes, the Drow takes the Attack action

            2. Yes, the Drow's attack uses a Light Melee Weapon

            3. Yes, if you modified the Drow by giving it a second short sword, then it has an another Light Melee Weapon in its other hand


            There you have it; the Drow can get a second attack if he has a second shortsword.



            NOTE: The attack action lets you draw one weapon as part of the action. If your Drow starts his turn empty-handed, he'll still get only one attack on that turn. He can draw (and use) the second short sword as part of his attack on his next turn.



            ALSO NOTE: If you want to be cheesy, a Drow would be complying with the rules if he grabbed a short sword off the ground (as an "Interact with an object"), then drew a second short sword as part of an attack action. For a CR 1/4 mook, this Drow is getting really industrious.



            This might affect the Drow's CR



            The CR 1/4 Drow stat block (Monster Manual p.128) lists actions for a typical Drow-on-the-street. This stat block implies that, given the nature of Drow society, an average non-soldier Drow will have chain mail, one shortsword, and one hand crossbow.



            That being said, as GM, you can modify a Drow by giving it an extra short sword. For that matter, you can also change its armor or change any of its equipment. You can even declare that an enclave of Drow are all infused with demon blood that lets them shoot lasers from their eyes. The stat block is just a time-saving summary; it shows a typical specimen so you don't have to calculate combat stats for every monster the party encounters.




            Feel free to tweak an existing creature to make it into something more
            useful for you... Keep in mind that modifying a monster, including
            when you apply a template to it, might change its challenge rating (MM
            p.6).




            Consult the Dungeon Master's Guide to figure out whether a change affects a monster's CR.



            This is mostly limited to Low-CR Humanoids



            Non-humanoids tend to use natural attacks, while high-CR creatures tend to use Multiattack, neither of which works with Two-Weapon Fighting.



            Two weapon fighting does NOT work with natural attacks (claws, fangs, etc.)



            The two-weapon fighting rule requires the creature to attack with a light weapon and to be holding a light weapon in its other hand. Most natural attacks are listed as a "melee weapon attack", but that's just to distinguish them from "melee spell attacks". Claws, fangs, tentacles, etc. are NOT an attack with a weapon, let alone a light weapon.



            Two weapon fighting does NOT work with Multiattack



            The two-weapon fighting rule lets you make an extra attack as a bonus action when you take the attack action.



            Multiattack is its own action. A creature using Multiattack is NOT taking the attack action; rather, it's choosing the "Multiattack" action listed in its stat block.



            Monsters that swing multiple weapons or that swing a weapon multiple times do so by listing "Multiattack" in their stat block. Again, a stat block is a summary of how a monster operates in combat.



            For example, a Marilith has six arms (and a tail). On her turn, she can draw and attack with six swords (and her tail). Why? Because she has a Multiattack action that says so. She isn't using the fighter's Extra Attack ability or Two-Weapon Fighting or the Dual Wielding feet. The stat block summarizes her training and her demonic nature into the fact we actually care about: She attacks with all six swords (and her tail).



            The Bottom Line



            Stat blocks are a summary of what a typical specimen of a monster can do. They're a convenience; planning an adventure is hard enough without the GM having to figure out every equipment permutation on every villainous minion a party might encounter.



            Any creature capable of holding two light weapons is capable of swinging both light weapons. This fact is accounted for on stat blocks by two things:



            Low-CR mooks are limited to possessing the weapons on their stat block because weapons cost money. Joe McPeasant doesn't get two short swords for the same reason that he doesn't get a suit of plate mail.



            Creatures that are actually GOOD at swinging multiple weapons and that tend to POSSESS multiple weapons generally say "Multiattack: [attacks with both of its weapons]" in their stat block.






            share|improve this answer




























              4














              Yes, in the example given



              The Drow you mention can take advantage of the two-weapon fighting rule if it has two short swords.




              When a monster takes its action, it can choose from the options in the
              Actions section of its stat block or use one of the actions available
              to all creatures, such as the Dash or Hide action, as described in the
              Player's Handbook (MM p.10).




              You quoted the two-weapon fighting text; let's check its requirements:




              1. Yes, the Drow takes the Attack action

              2. Yes, the Drow's attack uses a Light Melee Weapon

              3. Yes, if you modified the Drow by giving it a second short sword, then it has an another Light Melee Weapon in its other hand


              There you have it; the Drow can get a second attack if he has a second shortsword.



              NOTE: The attack action lets you draw one weapon as part of the action. If your Drow starts his turn empty-handed, he'll still get only one attack on that turn. He can draw (and use) the second short sword as part of his attack on his next turn.



              ALSO NOTE: If you want to be cheesy, a Drow would be complying with the rules if he grabbed a short sword off the ground (as an "Interact with an object"), then drew a second short sword as part of an attack action. For a CR 1/4 mook, this Drow is getting really industrious.



              This might affect the Drow's CR



              The CR 1/4 Drow stat block (Monster Manual p.128) lists actions for a typical Drow-on-the-street. This stat block implies that, given the nature of Drow society, an average non-soldier Drow will have chain mail, one shortsword, and one hand crossbow.



              That being said, as GM, you can modify a Drow by giving it an extra short sword. For that matter, you can also change its armor or change any of its equipment. You can even declare that an enclave of Drow are all infused with demon blood that lets them shoot lasers from their eyes. The stat block is just a time-saving summary; it shows a typical specimen so you don't have to calculate combat stats for every monster the party encounters.




              Feel free to tweak an existing creature to make it into something more
              useful for you... Keep in mind that modifying a monster, including
              when you apply a template to it, might change its challenge rating (MM
              p.6).




              Consult the Dungeon Master's Guide to figure out whether a change affects a monster's CR.



              This is mostly limited to Low-CR Humanoids



              Non-humanoids tend to use natural attacks, while high-CR creatures tend to use Multiattack, neither of which works with Two-Weapon Fighting.



              Two weapon fighting does NOT work with natural attacks (claws, fangs, etc.)



              The two-weapon fighting rule requires the creature to attack with a light weapon and to be holding a light weapon in its other hand. Most natural attacks are listed as a "melee weapon attack", but that's just to distinguish them from "melee spell attacks". Claws, fangs, tentacles, etc. are NOT an attack with a weapon, let alone a light weapon.



              Two weapon fighting does NOT work with Multiattack



              The two-weapon fighting rule lets you make an extra attack as a bonus action when you take the attack action.



              Multiattack is its own action. A creature using Multiattack is NOT taking the attack action; rather, it's choosing the "Multiattack" action listed in its stat block.



              Monsters that swing multiple weapons or that swing a weapon multiple times do so by listing "Multiattack" in their stat block. Again, a stat block is a summary of how a monster operates in combat.



              For example, a Marilith has six arms (and a tail). On her turn, she can draw and attack with six swords (and her tail). Why? Because she has a Multiattack action that says so. She isn't using the fighter's Extra Attack ability or Two-Weapon Fighting or the Dual Wielding feet. The stat block summarizes her training and her demonic nature into the fact we actually care about: She attacks with all six swords (and her tail).



              The Bottom Line



              Stat blocks are a summary of what a typical specimen of a monster can do. They're a convenience; planning an adventure is hard enough without the GM having to figure out every equipment permutation on every villainous minion a party might encounter.



              Any creature capable of holding two light weapons is capable of swinging both light weapons. This fact is accounted for on stat blocks by two things:



              Low-CR mooks are limited to possessing the weapons on their stat block because weapons cost money. Joe McPeasant doesn't get two short swords for the same reason that he doesn't get a suit of plate mail.



              Creatures that are actually GOOD at swinging multiple weapons and that tend to POSSESS multiple weapons generally say "Multiattack: [attacks with both of its weapons]" in their stat block.






              share|improve this answer


























                4












                4








                4






                Yes, in the example given



                The Drow you mention can take advantage of the two-weapon fighting rule if it has two short swords.




                When a monster takes its action, it can choose from the options in the
                Actions section of its stat block or use one of the actions available
                to all creatures, such as the Dash or Hide action, as described in the
                Player's Handbook (MM p.10).




                You quoted the two-weapon fighting text; let's check its requirements:




                1. Yes, the Drow takes the Attack action

                2. Yes, the Drow's attack uses a Light Melee Weapon

                3. Yes, if you modified the Drow by giving it a second short sword, then it has an another Light Melee Weapon in its other hand


                There you have it; the Drow can get a second attack if he has a second shortsword.



                NOTE: The attack action lets you draw one weapon as part of the action. If your Drow starts his turn empty-handed, he'll still get only one attack on that turn. He can draw (and use) the second short sword as part of his attack on his next turn.



                ALSO NOTE: If you want to be cheesy, a Drow would be complying with the rules if he grabbed a short sword off the ground (as an "Interact with an object"), then drew a second short sword as part of an attack action. For a CR 1/4 mook, this Drow is getting really industrious.



                This might affect the Drow's CR



                The CR 1/4 Drow stat block (Monster Manual p.128) lists actions for a typical Drow-on-the-street. This stat block implies that, given the nature of Drow society, an average non-soldier Drow will have chain mail, one shortsword, and one hand crossbow.



                That being said, as GM, you can modify a Drow by giving it an extra short sword. For that matter, you can also change its armor or change any of its equipment. You can even declare that an enclave of Drow are all infused with demon blood that lets them shoot lasers from their eyes. The stat block is just a time-saving summary; it shows a typical specimen so you don't have to calculate combat stats for every monster the party encounters.




                Feel free to tweak an existing creature to make it into something more
                useful for you... Keep in mind that modifying a monster, including
                when you apply a template to it, might change its challenge rating (MM
                p.6).




                Consult the Dungeon Master's Guide to figure out whether a change affects a monster's CR.



                This is mostly limited to Low-CR Humanoids



                Non-humanoids tend to use natural attacks, while high-CR creatures tend to use Multiattack, neither of which works with Two-Weapon Fighting.



                Two weapon fighting does NOT work with natural attacks (claws, fangs, etc.)



                The two-weapon fighting rule requires the creature to attack with a light weapon and to be holding a light weapon in its other hand. Most natural attacks are listed as a "melee weapon attack", but that's just to distinguish them from "melee spell attacks". Claws, fangs, tentacles, etc. are NOT an attack with a weapon, let alone a light weapon.



                Two weapon fighting does NOT work with Multiattack



                The two-weapon fighting rule lets you make an extra attack as a bonus action when you take the attack action.



                Multiattack is its own action. A creature using Multiattack is NOT taking the attack action; rather, it's choosing the "Multiattack" action listed in its stat block.



                Monsters that swing multiple weapons or that swing a weapon multiple times do so by listing "Multiattack" in their stat block. Again, a stat block is a summary of how a monster operates in combat.



                For example, a Marilith has six arms (and a tail). On her turn, she can draw and attack with six swords (and her tail). Why? Because she has a Multiattack action that says so. She isn't using the fighter's Extra Attack ability or Two-Weapon Fighting or the Dual Wielding feet. The stat block summarizes her training and her demonic nature into the fact we actually care about: She attacks with all six swords (and her tail).



                The Bottom Line



                Stat blocks are a summary of what a typical specimen of a monster can do. They're a convenience; planning an adventure is hard enough without the GM having to figure out every equipment permutation on every villainous minion a party might encounter.



                Any creature capable of holding two light weapons is capable of swinging both light weapons. This fact is accounted for on stat blocks by two things:



                Low-CR mooks are limited to possessing the weapons on their stat block because weapons cost money. Joe McPeasant doesn't get two short swords for the same reason that he doesn't get a suit of plate mail.



                Creatures that are actually GOOD at swinging multiple weapons and that tend to POSSESS multiple weapons generally say "Multiattack: [attacks with both of its weapons]" in their stat block.






                share|improve this answer














                Yes, in the example given



                The Drow you mention can take advantage of the two-weapon fighting rule if it has two short swords.




                When a monster takes its action, it can choose from the options in the
                Actions section of its stat block or use one of the actions available
                to all creatures, such as the Dash or Hide action, as described in the
                Player's Handbook (MM p.10).




                You quoted the two-weapon fighting text; let's check its requirements:




                1. Yes, the Drow takes the Attack action

                2. Yes, the Drow's attack uses a Light Melee Weapon

                3. Yes, if you modified the Drow by giving it a second short sword, then it has an another Light Melee Weapon in its other hand


                There you have it; the Drow can get a second attack if he has a second shortsword.



                NOTE: The attack action lets you draw one weapon as part of the action. If your Drow starts his turn empty-handed, he'll still get only one attack on that turn. He can draw (and use) the second short sword as part of his attack on his next turn.



                ALSO NOTE: If you want to be cheesy, a Drow would be complying with the rules if he grabbed a short sword off the ground (as an "Interact with an object"), then drew a second short sword as part of an attack action. For a CR 1/4 mook, this Drow is getting really industrious.



                This might affect the Drow's CR



                The CR 1/4 Drow stat block (Monster Manual p.128) lists actions for a typical Drow-on-the-street. This stat block implies that, given the nature of Drow society, an average non-soldier Drow will have chain mail, one shortsword, and one hand crossbow.



                That being said, as GM, you can modify a Drow by giving it an extra short sword. For that matter, you can also change its armor or change any of its equipment. You can even declare that an enclave of Drow are all infused with demon blood that lets them shoot lasers from their eyes. The stat block is just a time-saving summary; it shows a typical specimen so you don't have to calculate combat stats for every monster the party encounters.




                Feel free to tweak an existing creature to make it into something more
                useful for you... Keep in mind that modifying a monster, including
                when you apply a template to it, might change its challenge rating (MM
                p.6).




                Consult the Dungeon Master's Guide to figure out whether a change affects a monster's CR.



                This is mostly limited to Low-CR Humanoids



                Non-humanoids tend to use natural attacks, while high-CR creatures tend to use Multiattack, neither of which works with Two-Weapon Fighting.



                Two weapon fighting does NOT work with natural attacks (claws, fangs, etc.)



                The two-weapon fighting rule requires the creature to attack with a light weapon and to be holding a light weapon in its other hand. Most natural attacks are listed as a "melee weapon attack", but that's just to distinguish them from "melee spell attacks". Claws, fangs, tentacles, etc. are NOT an attack with a weapon, let alone a light weapon.



                Two weapon fighting does NOT work with Multiattack



                The two-weapon fighting rule lets you make an extra attack as a bonus action when you take the attack action.



                Multiattack is its own action. A creature using Multiattack is NOT taking the attack action; rather, it's choosing the "Multiattack" action listed in its stat block.



                Monsters that swing multiple weapons or that swing a weapon multiple times do so by listing "Multiattack" in their stat block. Again, a stat block is a summary of how a monster operates in combat.



                For example, a Marilith has six arms (and a tail). On her turn, she can draw and attack with six swords (and her tail). Why? Because she has a Multiattack action that says so. She isn't using the fighter's Extra Attack ability or Two-Weapon Fighting or the Dual Wielding feet. The stat block summarizes her training and her demonic nature into the fact we actually care about: She attacks with all six swords (and her tail).



                The Bottom Line



                Stat blocks are a summary of what a typical specimen of a monster can do. They're a convenience; planning an adventure is hard enough without the GM having to figure out every equipment permutation on every villainous minion a party might encounter.



                Any creature capable of holding two light weapons is capable of swinging both light weapons. This fact is accounted for on stat blocks by two things:



                Low-CR mooks are limited to possessing the weapons on their stat block because weapons cost money. Joe McPeasant doesn't get two short swords for the same reason that he doesn't get a suit of plate mail.



                Creatures that are actually GOOD at swinging multiple weapons and that tend to POSSESS multiple weapons generally say "Multiattack: [attacks with both of its weapons]" in their stat block.







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited 2 days ago

























                answered 2 days ago









                Greg Faust

                1,990320




                1,990320






















                    Emmanuel Acosta is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                    draft saved

                    draft discarded


















                    Emmanuel Acosta is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                    Emmanuel Acosta is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                    Emmanuel Acosta is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f138309%2fcan-any-creature-other-than-pcs-use-two-weapon-fighting%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Список кардиналов, возведённых папой римским Каликстом III

                    Deduzione

                    Mysql.sock missing - “Can't connect to local MySQL server through socket”