Intersection of two left cosets is empty












2












$begingroup$


I have $theta,tau, sigmain S_7$, where $theta=(13)(14)(567), tau=(137)(2456),
sigma=(13456)(27)$
. I need to find $sigma langlethetaranglecaptaulanglethetarangle$.



I approached this by first computing $langlethetarangle$. I got $langlethetarangle={(13)(24)(567),(576),(13)(24),(675),(13)(24)(576),id}$.



I then worked out the left coset $sigmalanglethetarangle$ by multiplying $(13456)(27)$ by every element in $langlethetarangle$, one by one. That gave me ${(1574632),(134726),(274563),(1346)(257),(263)(457)}$.



Using the same technique, I found $taulanglethetarangle$ to be ${(357)(46),(136247),(37)(456),(1357)(246),(3647),id}$.



But then I get $sigmalanglethetaranglecaptaulanglethetarangle=phi$, since there are no elements occurring in both $sigmalanglethetarangle$ and $taulanglethetarangle$.



Why is the intersection empty? If I have done this right, is there an easier way to tell that the intersection of two cosets will be empty, without having to work out each individual result (since that is tedious)?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Do you recall the fact that two left cosets are either equal or disjoint? (True for any group and subgroup.)
    $endgroup$
    – darij grinberg
    Jan 15 at 22:56


















2












$begingroup$


I have $theta,tau, sigmain S_7$, where $theta=(13)(14)(567), tau=(137)(2456),
sigma=(13456)(27)$
. I need to find $sigma langlethetaranglecaptaulanglethetarangle$.



I approached this by first computing $langlethetarangle$. I got $langlethetarangle={(13)(24)(567),(576),(13)(24),(675),(13)(24)(576),id}$.



I then worked out the left coset $sigmalanglethetarangle$ by multiplying $(13456)(27)$ by every element in $langlethetarangle$, one by one. That gave me ${(1574632),(134726),(274563),(1346)(257),(263)(457)}$.



Using the same technique, I found $taulanglethetarangle$ to be ${(357)(46),(136247),(37)(456),(1357)(246),(3647),id}$.



But then I get $sigmalanglethetaranglecaptaulanglethetarangle=phi$, since there are no elements occurring in both $sigmalanglethetarangle$ and $taulanglethetarangle$.



Why is the intersection empty? If I have done this right, is there an easier way to tell that the intersection of two cosets will be empty, without having to work out each individual result (since that is tedious)?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Do you recall the fact that two left cosets are either equal or disjoint? (True for any group and subgroup.)
    $endgroup$
    – darij grinberg
    Jan 15 at 22:56
















2












2








2





$begingroup$


I have $theta,tau, sigmain S_7$, where $theta=(13)(14)(567), tau=(137)(2456),
sigma=(13456)(27)$
. I need to find $sigma langlethetaranglecaptaulanglethetarangle$.



I approached this by first computing $langlethetarangle$. I got $langlethetarangle={(13)(24)(567),(576),(13)(24),(675),(13)(24)(576),id}$.



I then worked out the left coset $sigmalanglethetarangle$ by multiplying $(13456)(27)$ by every element in $langlethetarangle$, one by one. That gave me ${(1574632),(134726),(274563),(1346)(257),(263)(457)}$.



Using the same technique, I found $taulanglethetarangle$ to be ${(357)(46),(136247),(37)(456),(1357)(246),(3647),id}$.



But then I get $sigmalanglethetaranglecaptaulanglethetarangle=phi$, since there are no elements occurring in both $sigmalanglethetarangle$ and $taulanglethetarangle$.



Why is the intersection empty? If I have done this right, is there an easier way to tell that the intersection of two cosets will be empty, without having to work out each individual result (since that is tedious)?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I have $theta,tau, sigmain S_7$, where $theta=(13)(14)(567), tau=(137)(2456),
sigma=(13456)(27)$
. I need to find $sigma langlethetaranglecaptaulanglethetarangle$.



I approached this by first computing $langlethetarangle$. I got $langlethetarangle={(13)(24)(567),(576),(13)(24),(675),(13)(24)(576),id}$.



I then worked out the left coset $sigmalanglethetarangle$ by multiplying $(13456)(27)$ by every element in $langlethetarangle$, one by one. That gave me ${(1574632),(134726),(274563),(1346)(257),(263)(457)}$.



Using the same technique, I found $taulanglethetarangle$ to be ${(357)(46),(136247),(37)(456),(1357)(246),(3647),id}$.



But then I get $sigmalanglethetaranglecaptaulanglethetarangle=phi$, since there are no elements occurring in both $sigmalanglethetarangle$ and $taulanglethetarangle$.



Why is the intersection empty? If I have done this right, is there an easier way to tell that the intersection of two cosets will be empty, without having to work out each individual result (since that is tedious)?







abstract-algebra group-theory






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 15 at 22:54









HarmanHarman

302




302








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Do you recall the fact that two left cosets are either equal or disjoint? (True for any group and subgroup.)
    $endgroup$
    – darij grinberg
    Jan 15 at 22:56
















  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Do you recall the fact that two left cosets are either equal or disjoint? (True for any group and subgroup.)
    $endgroup$
    – darij grinberg
    Jan 15 at 22:56










2




2




$begingroup$
Do you recall the fact that two left cosets are either equal or disjoint? (True for any group and subgroup.)
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
Jan 15 at 22:56






$begingroup$
Do you recall the fact that two left cosets are either equal or disjoint? (True for any group and subgroup.)
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
Jan 15 at 22:56












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

Left (or right) cosets of a subgroup $;H;$ in a group $;G;$ are in fact equivalence classes, the equivalence relation $;sim;$ on $;G;$ being:



$$text{For};x,yin G;,;; xsim yiff x^{-1}yin H$$



We usually write $;xH=yH;$ instead of $;xsim y;$ . Check this is in fact an equivalence relation, and then we know two equivalence classes are either identical or else they're disjoint, and this just means $;xH = yH;;text{or};;xHcap yH=emptyset;$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    3












    $begingroup$

    Yes, this is standard. Given two left cosets of the same subgroup, either they're the same as sets, or they don't intersect at all.



    As such, all we need to do to find that two cosets of a subgroup are disjoint is to find a single element of one coset that's not in the other coset. An example that comes up fairly often: if $a$ is not an element of the subgroup $H$, the coset $aH$ doesn't intersect $H$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3075083%2fintersection-of-two-left-cosets-is-empty%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      4












      $begingroup$

      Left (or right) cosets of a subgroup $;H;$ in a group $;G;$ are in fact equivalence classes, the equivalence relation $;sim;$ on $;G;$ being:



      $$text{For};x,yin G;,;; xsim yiff x^{-1}yin H$$



      We usually write $;xH=yH;$ instead of $;xsim y;$ . Check this is in fact an equivalence relation, and then we know two equivalence classes are either identical or else they're disjoint, and this just means $;xH = yH;;text{or};;xHcap yH=emptyset;$






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$


















        4












        $begingroup$

        Left (or right) cosets of a subgroup $;H;$ in a group $;G;$ are in fact equivalence classes, the equivalence relation $;sim;$ on $;G;$ being:



        $$text{For};x,yin G;,;; xsim yiff x^{-1}yin H$$



        We usually write $;xH=yH;$ instead of $;xsim y;$ . Check this is in fact an equivalence relation, and then we know two equivalence classes are either identical or else they're disjoint, and this just means $;xH = yH;;text{or};;xHcap yH=emptyset;$






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$
















          4












          4








          4





          $begingroup$

          Left (or right) cosets of a subgroup $;H;$ in a group $;G;$ are in fact equivalence classes, the equivalence relation $;sim;$ on $;G;$ being:



          $$text{For};x,yin G;,;; xsim yiff x^{-1}yin H$$



          We usually write $;xH=yH;$ instead of $;xsim y;$ . Check this is in fact an equivalence relation, and then we know two equivalence classes are either identical or else they're disjoint, and this just means $;xH = yH;;text{or};;xHcap yH=emptyset;$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Left (or right) cosets of a subgroup $;H;$ in a group $;G;$ are in fact equivalence classes, the equivalence relation $;sim;$ on $;G;$ being:



          $$text{For};x,yin G;,;; xsim yiff x^{-1}yin H$$



          We usually write $;xH=yH;$ instead of $;xsim y;$ . Check this is in fact an equivalence relation, and then we know two equivalence classes are either identical or else they're disjoint, and this just means $;xH = yH;;text{or};;xHcap yH=emptyset;$







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Jan 15 at 22:59









          DonAntonioDonAntonio

          179k1494230




          179k1494230























              3












              $begingroup$

              Yes, this is standard. Given two left cosets of the same subgroup, either they're the same as sets, or they don't intersect at all.



              As such, all we need to do to find that two cosets of a subgroup are disjoint is to find a single element of one coset that's not in the other coset. An example that comes up fairly often: if $a$ is not an element of the subgroup $H$, the coset $aH$ doesn't intersect $H$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                3












                $begingroup$

                Yes, this is standard. Given two left cosets of the same subgroup, either they're the same as sets, or they don't intersect at all.



                As such, all we need to do to find that two cosets of a subgroup are disjoint is to find a single element of one coset that's not in the other coset. An example that comes up fairly often: if $a$ is not an element of the subgroup $H$, the coset $aH$ doesn't intersect $H$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  3












                  3








                  3





                  $begingroup$

                  Yes, this is standard. Given two left cosets of the same subgroup, either they're the same as sets, or they don't intersect at all.



                  As such, all we need to do to find that two cosets of a subgroup are disjoint is to find a single element of one coset that's not in the other coset. An example that comes up fairly often: if $a$ is not an element of the subgroup $H$, the coset $aH$ doesn't intersect $H$.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  Yes, this is standard. Given two left cosets of the same subgroup, either they're the same as sets, or they don't intersect at all.



                  As such, all we need to do to find that two cosets of a subgroup are disjoint is to find a single element of one coset that's not in the other coset. An example that comes up fairly often: if $a$ is not an element of the subgroup $H$, the coset $aH$ doesn't intersect $H$.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Jan 15 at 22:57









                  jmerryjmerry

                  11.1k1225




                  11.1k1225






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3075083%2fintersection-of-two-left-cosets-is-empty%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Список кардиналов, возведённых папой римским Каликстом III

                      Deduzione

                      Mysql.sock missing - “Can't connect to local MySQL server through socket”