Macro replacement list rescanning for replacement












8















I'm reading the Standard N1570 about macro replacement and misunderstand some wording from 6.10.3.4.




1 After all parameters in the replacement list have been substituted
and # and ## processing has taken place, all placemarker preprocessing
tokens are removed. The resulting preprocessing token sequence is then
rescanned, along with all subsequent preprocessing tokens of the
source file, for more macro names to replace




So after all # and ## are resolved we rescan the replacement list. But the section 2 specifies:




2 If the name of the macro being replaced is found during this scan of
the replacement list (not including the rest of the source file’s
preprocessing tokens), it is not replaced. Furthermore, if any nested
replacements encounter the name of the macro being replaced, it is not
replaced.




It looks contradictory to me. So what kind of replacement possible in that rescan? I tried the following example:



#define FOOBAR(a, b) printf(#a #b)

#define INVOKE(a, b) a##b(a, b)

int main() {
INVOKE(FOO, BAR); //expands to printf("FOO" "BAR")
}


So INVOKE(FOO, BAR) expands to FOOBAR(FOO, BAR) after substitution of ##. Then the replacement list FOOBAR(FOO, BAR) is rescanned. But the section 2. specifies that the name of the macro being replaced (FOOBAR) is found (yes, defined above) it is not replaced (but actually replaced as can be seen in th demo).



Can you please clarify that wording? What did I miss?



LIVE DEMO










share|improve this question



























    8















    I'm reading the Standard N1570 about macro replacement and misunderstand some wording from 6.10.3.4.




    1 After all parameters in the replacement list have been substituted
    and # and ## processing has taken place, all placemarker preprocessing
    tokens are removed. The resulting preprocessing token sequence is then
    rescanned, along with all subsequent preprocessing tokens of the
    source file, for more macro names to replace




    So after all # and ## are resolved we rescan the replacement list. But the section 2 specifies:




    2 If the name of the macro being replaced is found during this scan of
    the replacement list (not including the rest of the source file’s
    preprocessing tokens), it is not replaced. Furthermore, if any nested
    replacements encounter the name of the macro being replaced, it is not
    replaced.




    It looks contradictory to me. So what kind of replacement possible in that rescan? I tried the following example:



    #define FOOBAR(a, b) printf(#a #b)

    #define INVOKE(a, b) a##b(a, b)

    int main() {
    INVOKE(FOO, BAR); //expands to printf("FOO" "BAR")
    }


    So INVOKE(FOO, BAR) expands to FOOBAR(FOO, BAR) after substitution of ##. Then the replacement list FOOBAR(FOO, BAR) is rescanned. But the section 2. specifies that the name of the macro being replaced (FOOBAR) is found (yes, defined above) it is not replaced (but actually replaced as can be seen in th demo).



    Can you please clarify that wording? What did I miss?



    LIVE DEMO










    share|improve this question

























      8












      8








      8


      1






      I'm reading the Standard N1570 about macro replacement and misunderstand some wording from 6.10.3.4.




      1 After all parameters in the replacement list have been substituted
      and # and ## processing has taken place, all placemarker preprocessing
      tokens are removed. The resulting preprocessing token sequence is then
      rescanned, along with all subsequent preprocessing tokens of the
      source file, for more macro names to replace




      So after all # and ## are resolved we rescan the replacement list. But the section 2 specifies:




      2 If the name of the macro being replaced is found during this scan of
      the replacement list (not including the rest of the source file’s
      preprocessing tokens), it is not replaced. Furthermore, if any nested
      replacements encounter the name of the macro being replaced, it is not
      replaced.




      It looks contradictory to me. So what kind of replacement possible in that rescan? I tried the following example:



      #define FOOBAR(a, b) printf(#a #b)

      #define INVOKE(a, b) a##b(a, b)

      int main() {
      INVOKE(FOO, BAR); //expands to printf("FOO" "BAR")
      }


      So INVOKE(FOO, BAR) expands to FOOBAR(FOO, BAR) after substitution of ##. Then the replacement list FOOBAR(FOO, BAR) is rescanned. But the section 2. specifies that the name of the macro being replaced (FOOBAR) is found (yes, defined above) it is not replaced (but actually replaced as can be seen in th demo).



      Can you please clarify that wording? What did I miss?



      LIVE DEMO










      share|improve this question














      I'm reading the Standard N1570 about macro replacement and misunderstand some wording from 6.10.3.4.




      1 After all parameters in the replacement list have been substituted
      and # and ## processing has taken place, all placemarker preprocessing
      tokens are removed. The resulting preprocessing token sequence is then
      rescanned, along with all subsequent preprocessing tokens of the
      source file, for more macro names to replace




      So after all # and ## are resolved we rescan the replacement list. But the section 2 specifies:




      2 If the name of the macro being replaced is found during this scan of
      the replacement list (not including the rest of the source file’s
      preprocessing tokens), it is not replaced. Furthermore, if any nested
      replacements encounter the name of the macro being replaced, it is not
      replaced.




      It looks contradictory to me. So what kind of replacement possible in that rescan? I tried the following example:



      #define FOOBAR(a, b) printf(#a #b)

      #define INVOKE(a, b) a##b(a, b)

      int main() {
      INVOKE(FOO, BAR); //expands to printf("FOO" "BAR")
      }


      So INVOKE(FOO, BAR) expands to FOOBAR(FOO, BAR) after substitution of ##. Then the replacement list FOOBAR(FOO, BAR) is rescanned. But the section 2. specifies that the name of the macro being replaced (FOOBAR) is found (yes, defined above) it is not replaced (but actually replaced as can be seen in th demo).



      Can you please clarify that wording? What did I miss?



      LIVE DEMO







      c macros preprocessor






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 18 hours ago









      Some NameSome Name

      907214




      907214
























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          7














          The (original) macro being replaced is not FOOBAR, it's INVOKE. When you're expanding INVOKE and you find FOOBAR, you expand FOOBAR normally. However, if INVOKE had been found when expanding INVOKE, it would no longer be expanded.



          Let's take the following code:



          #define FOOBAR(a, b) printf(#a #b)

          #define INVOKE(a, b) e1 a##b(a, b)

          int main() {
          INVOKE(INV, OKE);
          }


          I added the e1 to the expansion of INVOKE to be able to visualise how many expansions happen. The result of preprocessing main is:



          e1 INVOKE(INV, OKE);


          This proves that INVOKE was expanded once and then, upon rescanning, not expanded again.



          [Live example]






          share|improve this answer































            4














            Consider the following simple example:



            #include<stdio.h>

            const int FOO = 42;

            #define FOO (42 + FOO)

            int main()
            {
            printf("%d", FOO);
            }


            Here the output will be 84.



            The printf will be expanded to:



            printf("%d", 42 + 42);


            This means that when the macro FOO is expanded, the expansion will stop when the second FOO is found. It will not be further expanded. Otherwise, you will end up with endless recursion resulting in: 42 + (42 + (42 + (42 + ....)



            Live demo here.






            share|improve this answer























              Your Answer






              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
              StackExchange.snippets.init();
              });
              });
              }, "code-snippets");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "1"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54194759%2fmacro-replacement-list-rescanning-for-replacement%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              7














              The (original) macro being replaced is not FOOBAR, it's INVOKE. When you're expanding INVOKE and you find FOOBAR, you expand FOOBAR normally. However, if INVOKE had been found when expanding INVOKE, it would no longer be expanded.



              Let's take the following code:



              #define FOOBAR(a, b) printf(#a #b)

              #define INVOKE(a, b) e1 a##b(a, b)

              int main() {
              INVOKE(INV, OKE);
              }


              I added the e1 to the expansion of INVOKE to be able to visualise how many expansions happen. The result of preprocessing main is:



              e1 INVOKE(INV, OKE);


              This proves that INVOKE was expanded once and then, upon rescanning, not expanded again.



              [Live example]






              share|improve this answer




























                7














                The (original) macro being replaced is not FOOBAR, it's INVOKE. When you're expanding INVOKE and you find FOOBAR, you expand FOOBAR normally. However, if INVOKE had been found when expanding INVOKE, it would no longer be expanded.



                Let's take the following code:



                #define FOOBAR(a, b) printf(#a #b)

                #define INVOKE(a, b) e1 a##b(a, b)

                int main() {
                INVOKE(INV, OKE);
                }


                I added the e1 to the expansion of INVOKE to be able to visualise how many expansions happen. The result of preprocessing main is:



                e1 INVOKE(INV, OKE);


                This proves that INVOKE was expanded once and then, upon rescanning, not expanded again.



                [Live example]






                share|improve this answer


























                  7












                  7








                  7







                  The (original) macro being replaced is not FOOBAR, it's INVOKE. When you're expanding INVOKE and you find FOOBAR, you expand FOOBAR normally. However, if INVOKE had been found when expanding INVOKE, it would no longer be expanded.



                  Let's take the following code:



                  #define FOOBAR(a, b) printf(#a #b)

                  #define INVOKE(a, b) e1 a##b(a, b)

                  int main() {
                  INVOKE(INV, OKE);
                  }


                  I added the e1 to the expansion of INVOKE to be able to visualise how many expansions happen. The result of preprocessing main is:



                  e1 INVOKE(INV, OKE);


                  This proves that INVOKE was expanded once and then, upon rescanning, not expanded again.



                  [Live example]






                  share|improve this answer













                  The (original) macro being replaced is not FOOBAR, it's INVOKE. When you're expanding INVOKE and you find FOOBAR, you expand FOOBAR normally. However, if INVOKE had been found when expanding INVOKE, it would no longer be expanded.



                  Let's take the following code:



                  #define FOOBAR(a, b) printf(#a #b)

                  #define INVOKE(a, b) e1 a##b(a, b)

                  int main() {
                  INVOKE(INV, OKE);
                  }


                  I added the e1 to the expansion of INVOKE to be able to visualise how many expansions happen. The result of preprocessing main is:



                  e1 INVOKE(INV, OKE);


                  This proves that INVOKE was expanded once and then, upon rescanning, not expanded again.



                  [Live example]







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 18 hours ago









                  AngewAngew

                  132k11249340




                  132k11249340

























                      4














                      Consider the following simple example:



                      #include<stdio.h>

                      const int FOO = 42;

                      #define FOO (42 + FOO)

                      int main()
                      {
                      printf("%d", FOO);
                      }


                      Here the output will be 84.



                      The printf will be expanded to:



                      printf("%d", 42 + 42);


                      This means that when the macro FOO is expanded, the expansion will stop when the second FOO is found. It will not be further expanded. Otherwise, you will end up with endless recursion resulting in: 42 + (42 + (42 + (42 + ....)



                      Live demo here.






                      share|improve this answer




























                        4














                        Consider the following simple example:



                        #include<stdio.h>

                        const int FOO = 42;

                        #define FOO (42 + FOO)

                        int main()
                        {
                        printf("%d", FOO);
                        }


                        Here the output will be 84.



                        The printf will be expanded to:



                        printf("%d", 42 + 42);


                        This means that when the macro FOO is expanded, the expansion will stop when the second FOO is found. It will not be further expanded. Otherwise, you will end up with endless recursion resulting in: 42 + (42 + (42 + (42 + ....)



                        Live demo here.






                        share|improve this answer


























                          4












                          4








                          4







                          Consider the following simple example:



                          #include<stdio.h>

                          const int FOO = 42;

                          #define FOO (42 + FOO)

                          int main()
                          {
                          printf("%d", FOO);
                          }


                          Here the output will be 84.



                          The printf will be expanded to:



                          printf("%d", 42 + 42);


                          This means that when the macro FOO is expanded, the expansion will stop when the second FOO is found. It will not be further expanded. Otherwise, you will end up with endless recursion resulting in: 42 + (42 + (42 + (42 + ....)



                          Live demo here.






                          share|improve this answer













                          Consider the following simple example:



                          #include<stdio.h>

                          const int FOO = 42;

                          #define FOO (42 + FOO)

                          int main()
                          {
                          printf("%d", FOO);
                          }


                          Here the output will be 84.



                          The printf will be expanded to:



                          printf("%d", 42 + 42);


                          This means that when the macro FOO is expanded, the expansion will stop when the second FOO is found. It will not be further expanded. Otherwise, you will end up with endless recursion resulting in: 42 + (42 + (42 + (42 + ....)



                          Live demo here.







                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered 18 hours ago









                          P.WP.W

                          12.2k3843




                          12.2k3843






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54194759%2fmacro-replacement-list-rescanning-for-replacement%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Список кардиналов, возведённых папой римским Каликстом III

                              Deduzione

                              Mysql.sock missing - “Can't connect to local MySQL server through socket”