Expressions for the inverse function of f(x) = ln(x)e^x











up vote
8
down vote

favorite












Can the inverse of $ ln(x)e^x $ be finitely expressed in terms of the Lambert-W function or any other well-known transcendental functions? It is clear that a closed-form elementary function expression is unreachable.



The reason I ask is in pondering on the links between the inverse Lambert-W and some naturally arising functions of similar forms. Recall that the Lambert-W, a transcendental function, is defined as $ W(xe^x) = x. $



It is natural then to consider the inverse of functions such as $ g(x) = xe^{e^x} $ and those with further exponentiation. With a simple transformation $ z= e^x $ we can reduce $ g(x) $ to the form $ ln(z)e^z $ as originally posed. So the broader question arises: are there tangible algebraic links between the inverses of the set
$$ {xe^x, xe^{e^x},xe^{e^{e^x}}}... $$










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Hiraxin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
























    up vote
    8
    down vote

    favorite












    Can the inverse of $ ln(x)e^x $ be finitely expressed in terms of the Lambert-W function or any other well-known transcendental functions? It is clear that a closed-form elementary function expression is unreachable.



    The reason I ask is in pondering on the links between the inverse Lambert-W and some naturally arising functions of similar forms. Recall that the Lambert-W, a transcendental function, is defined as $ W(xe^x) = x. $



    It is natural then to consider the inverse of functions such as $ g(x) = xe^{e^x} $ and those with further exponentiation. With a simple transformation $ z= e^x $ we can reduce $ g(x) $ to the form $ ln(z)e^z $ as originally posed. So the broader question arises: are there tangible algebraic links between the inverses of the set
    $$ {xe^x, xe^{e^x},xe^{e^{e^x}}}... $$










    share|cite|improve this question







    New contributor




    Hiraxin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






















      up vote
      8
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      8
      down vote

      favorite











      Can the inverse of $ ln(x)e^x $ be finitely expressed in terms of the Lambert-W function or any other well-known transcendental functions? It is clear that a closed-form elementary function expression is unreachable.



      The reason I ask is in pondering on the links between the inverse Lambert-W and some naturally arising functions of similar forms. Recall that the Lambert-W, a transcendental function, is defined as $ W(xe^x) = x. $



      It is natural then to consider the inverse of functions such as $ g(x) = xe^{e^x} $ and those with further exponentiation. With a simple transformation $ z= e^x $ we can reduce $ g(x) $ to the form $ ln(z)e^z $ as originally posed. So the broader question arises: are there tangible algebraic links between the inverses of the set
      $$ {xe^x, xe^{e^x},xe^{e^{e^x}}}... $$










      share|cite|improve this question







      New contributor




      Hiraxin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      Can the inverse of $ ln(x)e^x $ be finitely expressed in terms of the Lambert-W function or any other well-known transcendental functions? It is clear that a closed-form elementary function expression is unreachable.



      The reason I ask is in pondering on the links between the inverse Lambert-W and some naturally arising functions of similar forms. Recall that the Lambert-W, a transcendental function, is defined as $ W(xe^x) = x. $



      It is natural then to consider the inverse of functions such as $ g(x) = xe^{e^x} $ and those with further exponentiation. With a simple transformation $ z= e^x $ we can reduce $ g(x) $ to the form $ ln(z)e^z $ as originally posed. So the broader question arises: are there tangible algebraic links between the inverses of the set
      $$ {xe^x, xe^{e^x},xe^{e^{e^x}}}... $$







      real-analysis






      share|cite|improve this question







      New contributor




      Hiraxin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|cite|improve this question







      New contributor




      Hiraxin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question






      New contributor




      Hiraxin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked Nov 13 at 6:33









      Hiraxin

      412




      412




      New contributor




      Hiraxin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Hiraxin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Hiraxin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          7
          down vote













          These are so-called hyper-Lambert functions, see
          On some applications of the generalized hyper-Lambert functions.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Thank you much. :)
            – Hiraxin
            Nov 13 at 14:07











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "504"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });






          Hiraxin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f315204%2fexpressions-for-the-inverse-function-of-fx-lnxex%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          7
          down vote













          These are so-called hyper-Lambert functions, see
          On some applications of the generalized hyper-Lambert functions.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Thank you much. :)
            – Hiraxin
            Nov 13 at 14:07















          up vote
          7
          down vote













          These are so-called hyper-Lambert functions, see
          On some applications of the generalized hyper-Lambert functions.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Thank you much. :)
            – Hiraxin
            Nov 13 at 14:07













          up vote
          7
          down vote










          up vote
          7
          down vote









          These are so-called hyper-Lambert functions, see
          On some applications of the generalized hyper-Lambert functions.






          share|cite|improve this answer














          These are so-called hyper-Lambert functions, see
          On some applications of the generalized hyper-Lambert functions.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Nov 13 at 9:54

























          answered Nov 13 at 9:47









          Carlo Beenakker

          71.3k9160267




          71.3k9160267












          • Thank you much. :)
            – Hiraxin
            Nov 13 at 14:07


















          • Thank you much. :)
            – Hiraxin
            Nov 13 at 14:07
















          Thank you much. :)
          – Hiraxin
          Nov 13 at 14:07




          Thank you much. :)
          – Hiraxin
          Nov 13 at 14:07










          Hiraxin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          Hiraxin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













          Hiraxin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












          Hiraxin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.















           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f315204%2fexpressions-for-the-inverse-function-of-fx-lnxex%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Список кардиналов, возведённых папой римским Каликстом III

          Deduzione

          Mysql.sock missing - “Can't connect to local MySQL server through socket”