Clarification on running multiple async tasks in parallel with throttling and polly policies





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







1












$begingroup$


I'm trying to run multiple async Tasks in parallel with throttling using polly AsyncBulkheadPolicy + WaitAndRetryPolicy. My understanding so far is that the policy method ExecuteAsync does not itself make a call onto a thread, but is leaving that to the default Task Scheduler or someone before it. Thus, if my tasks are CPU bound in some way then I need to use Parallel.ForEach when executing tasks or Task.Run() with the ExecuteAsync method in order to schedule the tasks to background threads.



Can someone look at the examples below and clarify how they would work in terms of parallism and threadpooling? What they would suggest?



https://github.com/App-vNext/Polly/wiki/Bulkhead - Operation: The policy itself does not place calls onto threads; it assumes upstream systems have already placed calls into threads, but limits their parallelization of execution.



async Task DoSomething(IEnumerable<object> objects);

//Example 1:
//Simple use, but then I don't have access to retry policies from polly
Parallel.ForEach(groupedObjects, (set) =>
{
var task = DoSomething(set);
task.Wait();
});

//Example 2:
//Uses default TaskScheduler which may or may not run the tasks in parallel
var parallelTasks = new List<Task>();
foreach (var set in groupedObjects)
{
var task = bulkheadPolicy.ExecuteAsync(async () => DoSomething(set));
parallelTasks.Add(task);
};

await Task.WhenAll(parallelTasks);

//Example 3:
//seems to defeat the purpose of the bulkhead since Parallel.ForEach and
//PolicyBulkheadAsync can both do throttling...just use basic RetryPolicy
//here?
Parallel.ForEach(groupedObjects, (set) =>
{
var task = policy.ExecuteAsync(async () => DoSomething(set));
task.Wait();
});


//Example 4:
//Task.Run still uses the default Task Scheduler and isn't any different than
//Example 2; just makes more tasks (wrapping the async tasks)
var parallelTasks = new List<Task>();
foreach (var set in groupedObjects)
{
var task = Task.Run(async () => await bulkheadPolicy.ExecuteAsync(async () => DoSomething(set)));
parallelTasks.Add(task);
};

await Task.WhenAll(parallelTasks);


DoSomething is an async method doing operations on a set of objects, it's both I/O and CPU bound. I'd like this to happen in parallel threads while respecting retry policies from polly and allowing for throttling.



I seem to have confused myself along the way in what exactly the functional behavior of Parallel.ForEach and using Bulkhead.ExecuteAsync does, however, when it comes to how tasks/threads are handled.



I'm leaning towards example 3 or a tweaked 4 (Task.Run + ConfigureAwait(false) should net me different threadpool threads, yes?)










share|improve this question







New contributor




Jonathan Allbritten is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$



















    1












    $begingroup$


    I'm trying to run multiple async Tasks in parallel with throttling using polly AsyncBulkheadPolicy + WaitAndRetryPolicy. My understanding so far is that the policy method ExecuteAsync does not itself make a call onto a thread, but is leaving that to the default Task Scheduler or someone before it. Thus, if my tasks are CPU bound in some way then I need to use Parallel.ForEach when executing tasks or Task.Run() with the ExecuteAsync method in order to schedule the tasks to background threads.



    Can someone look at the examples below and clarify how they would work in terms of parallism and threadpooling? What they would suggest?



    https://github.com/App-vNext/Polly/wiki/Bulkhead - Operation: The policy itself does not place calls onto threads; it assumes upstream systems have already placed calls into threads, but limits their parallelization of execution.



    async Task DoSomething(IEnumerable<object> objects);

    //Example 1:
    //Simple use, but then I don't have access to retry policies from polly
    Parallel.ForEach(groupedObjects, (set) =>
    {
    var task = DoSomething(set);
    task.Wait();
    });

    //Example 2:
    //Uses default TaskScheduler which may or may not run the tasks in parallel
    var parallelTasks = new List<Task>();
    foreach (var set in groupedObjects)
    {
    var task = bulkheadPolicy.ExecuteAsync(async () => DoSomething(set));
    parallelTasks.Add(task);
    };

    await Task.WhenAll(parallelTasks);

    //Example 3:
    //seems to defeat the purpose of the bulkhead since Parallel.ForEach and
    //PolicyBulkheadAsync can both do throttling...just use basic RetryPolicy
    //here?
    Parallel.ForEach(groupedObjects, (set) =>
    {
    var task = policy.ExecuteAsync(async () => DoSomething(set));
    task.Wait();
    });


    //Example 4:
    //Task.Run still uses the default Task Scheduler and isn't any different than
    //Example 2; just makes more tasks (wrapping the async tasks)
    var parallelTasks = new List<Task>();
    foreach (var set in groupedObjects)
    {
    var task = Task.Run(async () => await bulkheadPolicy.ExecuteAsync(async () => DoSomething(set)));
    parallelTasks.Add(task);
    };

    await Task.WhenAll(parallelTasks);


    DoSomething is an async method doing operations on a set of objects, it's both I/O and CPU bound. I'd like this to happen in parallel threads while respecting retry policies from polly and allowing for throttling.



    I seem to have confused myself along the way in what exactly the functional behavior of Parallel.ForEach and using Bulkhead.ExecuteAsync does, however, when it comes to how tasks/threads are handled.



    I'm leaning towards example 3 or a tweaked 4 (Task.Run + ConfigureAwait(false) should net me different threadpool threads, yes?)










    share|improve this question







    New contributor




    Jonathan Allbritten is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.







    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      I'm trying to run multiple async Tasks in parallel with throttling using polly AsyncBulkheadPolicy + WaitAndRetryPolicy. My understanding so far is that the policy method ExecuteAsync does not itself make a call onto a thread, but is leaving that to the default Task Scheduler or someone before it. Thus, if my tasks are CPU bound in some way then I need to use Parallel.ForEach when executing tasks or Task.Run() with the ExecuteAsync method in order to schedule the tasks to background threads.



      Can someone look at the examples below and clarify how they would work in terms of parallism and threadpooling? What they would suggest?



      https://github.com/App-vNext/Polly/wiki/Bulkhead - Operation: The policy itself does not place calls onto threads; it assumes upstream systems have already placed calls into threads, but limits their parallelization of execution.



      async Task DoSomething(IEnumerable<object> objects);

      //Example 1:
      //Simple use, but then I don't have access to retry policies from polly
      Parallel.ForEach(groupedObjects, (set) =>
      {
      var task = DoSomething(set);
      task.Wait();
      });

      //Example 2:
      //Uses default TaskScheduler which may or may not run the tasks in parallel
      var parallelTasks = new List<Task>();
      foreach (var set in groupedObjects)
      {
      var task = bulkheadPolicy.ExecuteAsync(async () => DoSomething(set));
      parallelTasks.Add(task);
      };

      await Task.WhenAll(parallelTasks);

      //Example 3:
      //seems to defeat the purpose of the bulkhead since Parallel.ForEach and
      //PolicyBulkheadAsync can both do throttling...just use basic RetryPolicy
      //here?
      Parallel.ForEach(groupedObjects, (set) =>
      {
      var task = policy.ExecuteAsync(async () => DoSomething(set));
      task.Wait();
      });


      //Example 4:
      //Task.Run still uses the default Task Scheduler and isn't any different than
      //Example 2; just makes more tasks (wrapping the async tasks)
      var parallelTasks = new List<Task>();
      foreach (var set in groupedObjects)
      {
      var task = Task.Run(async () => await bulkheadPolicy.ExecuteAsync(async () => DoSomething(set)));
      parallelTasks.Add(task);
      };

      await Task.WhenAll(parallelTasks);


      DoSomething is an async method doing operations on a set of objects, it's both I/O and CPU bound. I'd like this to happen in parallel threads while respecting retry policies from polly and allowing for throttling.



      I seem to have confused myself along the way in what exactly the functional behavior of Parallel.ForEach and using Bulkhead.ExecuteAsync does, however, when it comes to how tasks/threads are handled.



      I'm leaning towards example 3 or a tweaked 4 (Task.Run + ConfigureAwait(false) should net me different threadpool threads, yes?)










      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      Jonathan Allbritten is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.







      $endgroup$




      I'm trying to run multiple async Tasks in parallel with throttling using polly AsyncBulkheadPolicy + WaitAndRetryPolicy. My understanding so far is that the policy method ExecuteAsync does not itself make a call onto a thread, but is leaving that to the default Task Scheduler or someone before it. Thus, if my tasks are CPU bound in some way then I need to use Parallel.ForEach when executing tasks or Task.Run() with the ExecuteAsync method in order to schedule the tasks to background threads.



      Can someone look at the examples below and clarify how they would work in terms of parallism and threadpooling? What they would suggest?



      https://github.com/App-vNext/Polly/wiki/Bulkhead - Operation: The policy itself does not place calls onto threads; it assumes upstream systems have already placed calls into threads, but limits their parallelization of execution.



      async Task DoSomething(IEnumerable<object> objects);

      //Example 1:
      //Simple use, but then I don't have access to retry policies from polly
      Parallel.ForEach(groupedObjects, (set) =>
      {
      var task = DoSomething(set);
      task.Wait();
      });

      //Example 2:
      //Uses default TaskScheduler which may or may not run the tasks in parallel
      var parallelTasks = new List<Task>();
      foreach (var set in groupedObjects)
      {
      var task = bulkheadPolicy.ExecuteAsync(async () => DoSomething(set));
      parallelTasks.Add(task);
      };

      await Task.WhenAll(parallelTasks);

      //Example 3:
      //seems to defeat the purpose of the bulkhead since Parallel.ForEach and
      //PolicyBulkheadAsync can both do throttling...just use basic RetryPolicy
      //here?
      Parallel.ForEach(groupedObjects, (set) =>
      {
      var task = policy.ExecuteAsync(async () => DoSomething(set));
      task.Wait();
      });


      //Example 4:
      //Task.Run still uses the default Task Scheduler and isn't any different than
      //Example 2; just makes more tasks (wrapping the async tasks)
      var parallelTasks = new List<Task>();
      foreach (var set in groupedObjects)
      {
      var task = Task.Run(async () => await bulkheadPolicy.ExecuteAsync(async () => DoSomething(set)));
      parallelTasks.Add(task);
      };

      await Task.WhenAll(parallelTasks);


      DoSomething is an async method doing operations on a set of objects, it's both I/O and CPU bound. I'd like this to happen in parallel threads while respecting retry policies from polly and allowing for throttling.



      I seem to have confused myself along the way in what exactly the functional behavior of Parallel.ForEach and using Bulkhead.ExecuteAsync does, however, when it comes to how tasks/threads are handled.



      I'm leaning towards example 3 or a tweaked 4 (Task.Run + ConfigureAwait(false) should net me different threadpool threads, yes?)







      c# performance multithreading asynchronous task-parallel-library






      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      Jonathan Allbritten is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      Jonathan Allbritten is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question






      New contributor




      Jonathan Allbritten is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 1 hour ago









      Jonathan AllbrittenJonathan Allbritten

      61




      61




      New contributor




      Jonathan Allbritten is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Jonathan Allbritten is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Jonathan Allbritten is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes












          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "196"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });






          Jonathan Allbritten is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f217241%2fclarification-on-running-multiple-async-tasks-in-parallel-with-throttling-and-po%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          Jonathan Allbritten is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          Jonathan Allbritten is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













          Jonathan Allbritten is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












          Jonathan Allbritten is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















          Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f217241%2fclarification-on-running-multiple-async-tasks-in-parallel-with-throttling-and-po%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Список кардиналов, возведённых папой римским Каликстом III

          Deduzione

          Mysql.sock missing - “Can't connect to local MySQL server through socket”